HomeMy WebLinkAboutHLC May 2023 Packet* A C3 E N D /\ *
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall, 80.1 Main St. - 3:30 p. m.
* A <3 E N D /t *
APPROVALOF MINUTES
Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting held April 10, 2023.
REGULAR MEETING
l\ Arequest for a Certificate ofAppropriateness tokeep aporch.
Applicant: Pat Jones
Location: 2286 Rusk Street
2) PZ2023-142:A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to keep pillars and gable
detail.
Applicant: ]enniferRocha
Location: 2598Hazel Avenue
3) Arequest for oCertificate ofAppropriateness to[eszewindows.
Applicant: Daniel Garcia
Location: 555 9t" Street
4\ /\ request for aCertificate ofAppropriateness tosupport anapplication for
a State Historical Designation and National Register ofHistoric Maces and placement of
markers.
/\pp|icant. Chad MyzeU
Location: 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue
5) Arequest for aCertificate ofAppropriateness toreduce windows and
construct a new driveway.
Applicant: Pat Jones
Location: 25G5Rusk Street
6) Historic District Code Enforcement Report
OTHER BUSINESS
ADIOIJRN
"To protect, enhance and perpetuate historic landmarks which represent or reflect distinctive
and important elements of the City"s and State"s architecturol, archaeological, cultural, social,
economic, ethnic and political history and to develop oppropriate settings for such places.
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or
services are requested to contact Kaltrina Minick at 409-880-3777.
HI TO I-4ANDMARKL COMMISSION
April 10, 2023
Is' Floor- Confcrence Room, Ste. 130, City Hall, 801 Main Street, Beaumont, Texas
A Regular Meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission was held on April 10, 2023 and called
to order at 3 -.3 5 p. m. with the following memb ers present:
Acting Clurairman Lyiida Kay Makin
Con-unissioner Yolanda Nan Avery
Commissioner Hester Bell
Coinmissioner Christina Crawford
Commissioner Theresa Goodness
Commissioner Hajrah Javed *,arrivedat 3:40
Commissioner Thomas Sigee
Commissioner Janelle Templeton
Commission Members absent: Chairman Dolio LaBiche
Commissioner John Berube
Commissioner Marva Provo
Also present: Chris Boone, Assistant City Manager, Community Services
Demi Engman, Planning Manager
Elayna Luckey, Planner I
Susan Smith, Recording Secretary
APPROVAI-i OF MINUTES
Commissioner Goodness moved to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting held on March 13,
2023. Commissioner Sigee seconded the motion. The motion to approve The motion to approve
carried 7:0. Commissioner Javed not yet present.
REGFULAR MEETING
1) PZ2023-107: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a hog wire fence.
Applicant: David Bradley
Location: 694 Forrest Street
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff report. Applicant, David Bradley, requests permission to keep a
hog wire fence to the property located at 694 Forrest. The hog wire fence has been constructed to
1e four (4) and a half (1/2) feet in height with 2x4 triiii cattle fencing and is situated along the
Hi istoric Landmark Commission
April 10, 2023
northern and western sides of the Property. The placen-ient of the fence appears to not restrict the
visibility of the structure or the surrounding StRIctures.
The property is in the 1977and 1989 SPARE Beauniont Survey. SPARE. states the house was built
in 1899. The buildings sigiiificance is listed as, Beaumont' s best example of a small Queen Am -le
house and one of the few surviving from the pre - Spin dletop cra. The finely detailed Structure
includes original woodwork as well as stained and beveled glass windows. The house was built
for the Holmes Duke, a prominent local businessman and city official. A recorded Texas Landmark
listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Staffrecommended approval.
Slides of the subject property sere shown.
The applicant was present. David Bradley, 2165 North Street, Beaumont, Texas addressed the
Commission. Mr. Bradley stated that he purchased the home approximately 11 years ago. The
property wras in a state of condemnation due to termites and he has been restoring the home for
approximately the past year. He further stated that the current fencing was installed approximately
I V2month ago and was not aware that the home sits within the City's Historic Landmark District.
The property has been cleared of brush and debris and the alleyways are now private roadways.
Mr. Bradley also stated that fencing leas been constructed on the McFaddin end of the property to
isolate the property from the homeless persons problem he was having with the Salvation Arty.-ty
and Some Other Place. He further stated that his original plan was to move the house to the Historic
District, Mr. Bradley indicated that lie chose hog wire fencing because he did not care for the
existing aluminum fencing and a privacy fence would block the view of the home. He also gave
examples of this type of fcneing used at other homes within the Historic District and would like to
keep the original appearance of the property. Mr. Bradley ffirther stated that property will be used
as commercial office space.
Commissioner Crawford moved to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
install a hog wire fence, as requested in file PZ2023-107.
Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. The motion to approve the request carried 8:0.
2) PZ2023-116: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace metal posts.
Applicant: George Leonard
Location: 2575 Hazel Street
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff rcport. Applicant, George Lconard, on behalf of property owner
Paula Rodriguez, rcquests permission to replace the metal posts at the property located at 2575
Hazel Street with wooden six inch (6") by six inch (6") posts. The metal posts at the entry are
deteriorating and the homeowner is remodeling and wishes to havc such replaced while the work
is in progress.
2
Historic Landniai* Commission
April 10, 2023
The submitted wooded posts for the porch appear to be appropriate for a Dutch colonial home with
new traditional influence, in accordance to photos demonstrated in A Field Guicle to Ainerican
Houses (McAlester et al., pgs. 118-119).
The property is in the 1991 SPARE Beaumont Survcy. SPARE states the house was built c.. 1930.
The buildings significance is listed as, a coinnion house form built in the 1930's in Beaun-iont.
Mrs. Luckey noted that the metal posts lArefe removed some time after the packets werc mailed to
the Commissioners and is uncertain if the current posts are permanent or temporary.
Staff recommended approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. The posts be painted to match the structure.
2. All applicable building permits and inspections are to be obtained through the
Building Codes Department.
Slides of the subJect property were shown.
The property owner was present. Paola Rodriguez, 2575 Hazel Street, Beaumont, Texas addressed
the Commission. Ms. Rodriguez stated that the current wooden tei-nporary posts are in place
because once the metal posts were removed, the City instructed them to not move forward with
the project. She further stated that the old metal posts were rusted and is unaware if similar metal
posts are available. The property owner was advised of local historic salvage vendors that supply
metal posts similar to the posts previously in place. Ms. Rodriguez also stated that wooden posts
are preferred and no wooden caps or moulding will be placed on the posts.
Commissioner Sigee moved to deny the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace
metal posts, as requested in file PZ2023-116, with the following conditions -
I . The posts be painted to match the structure.
2. All applicable building permits and inspections are to be obtained through the
Building Codes Department.
Commissioner Crawford seconded the motion. The motion to deny the request carried 7:1
("I"empleton).
3) PZ2023-118-0 A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a hog wire fence.
Applicant: J.W. Turner Construction, LTD for Mary Zavala
Location: 2075 Liberty Avenue
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff report. Applicant, Joseph Reho, on behalf of property owner
Karen Corwin, requests permission to install a hog wire fence to the property located at 2540
Hazel. The hog wire fence will be constrLICted to be four (4) feet in height with, 2x4 trim cattle
3
Historic Landiiiai-k Commission
Apt it 10, 2023
fencing, to include a portion of the vacant property to the west that is also owned by Ms. Corwin.
The placement of the fence appears to not hinder the visibility of the structure or surrounding
structures.
The property is in the 1991 SPARE Beauniont Survey. SPARE states the house was built c.
1939. The buildings significance is listed as, an example of a common house built in the 1930's.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
Slides of the subject property werc shown.
The applicant was not present.
Con-u-nissioner Goodness moved to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
install a hog wire fence, as requested in file PZ2023-118.
Commissioner Avery sceonded the motion. The motion to approve the request carried 8:0.
4) PZ2023-132: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a hog wire fence.
Applicant: Marco Lopez
Location: 2171 Liberty Avenue
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff report. Applicant, Marco Lopez, requests permission to keep a
hog wire fence to the vacant property located at 2171 Liberty. The hog wire fence has been
constructed to be five (5) feet in height with, 2x4 trini cattle fencing. Mr. Lopez was granted a
Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 5' wooden fence to surround the property oil March 22,
2023. On the same day Inspector Randle noticed the hog wire fencing during routine inspections.
The request was amended to match what had been installed and Mr. Lopez was notified his request
would appear before the Historic, Landmark Cominission. The installation of fence, does not
appear to restrict visibility of surrounding structures.
The property is not listed in the SPARE Beaumont survey.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
The applicant was present. Marco Lopez, 2165 Liberty Avenue, Beaumont, Texas addressed the
Conunission. Mr. Lopez stated that he did not realize the original Certificate of Appropriateness
specified that it was for the installation of 5' solid wooden fence. He farther stated that he is happy
that lie resides in the Historic District and wishes to maintain its appearance.
Commissioner Goodness n-ioved to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
install a hog wire fence, as requested in file PZ2023-132.
4
Historic LaWmark Commissioll
April 10, 2023
Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken. The motion to approve the
request carried 8-0.
5) PZ2023-137- A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to relocate a World War I
monuinent.
Applicant: City of Beaumont
Location: Main Street to 2290 Pine Street
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff report. The City of Beaumont, requests permission to relocate the
World War I inonument currently located in downtown Beaumont within the right-of-way of Main
,Street. The proposed location for the monument is within the front entry of the historically
accredited Magnolia cemetery located at 2290 Pine Street.
Magnolia Cemetery has served S011theaSt the as for over one hundred twenty years (120) provided
its founder William McFaddin, a pioneer and Texas War for Independence Veteran, who deeded
approximately two acres of his land to the Town of Beaumont in 1876. The prominent display of
the monument will be within the entrance of Magnolia Cemetery and will provide the visual
presence and accessibility that its current location of a City right-of-way lacks. With understanding
that over two hundred thousand (200,000) Texans served in the military during World War 1,
housing the monument where many veterans of that war are laid to rest seems appropriate.
Neither property is listed in the SPARE Beaumont survey.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
Slides of the current monument location were shown, along with the proposed location.
Mrs. Luckey stated that included in the packets were copies of the 2017 Special Edition of the
�
6
Texas Historic Commission medallion related to WWI memorabilia and monument placement
throughout Texas cemeteries.
Brief discussion followed concerning the William McFaddin historical dedication monument
currently located at the proposed site and other possible locations for the World War I monument.
Mrs. Luckey explained that the idea of moving the montiment was proposed to the City by the
Jefferson County Historical Commission and Magnolia Cemetery. Commissioner Goodness stated
that the Jefferson County Historical Commission established a committee to review the proposal
and to research the deceased World War I soldiers that were from Beaumont. She ffirther stated
that the Commission would like to call attention to the service of the men and women that died in
the war and to place the n-ionumcrit where it can be better seen by the public.
Donald Smart, P.O. Box 591.1, Hardin., Tex -cis addressed the Commission. Mr. Smart stated that
thirty-nine Beaumont men died in WWI of which twenty-two are buried at Magnolia Cemetery,
one at Hebrew Rest Cemetery, and two at Evergreen Cemetery. He ffirther stated that the Jefferson
County Historical Commission is creating a booklet containing a biography of each of the thirty-
nine soldiers and their burial site location. Mr. Smart also stated that the Commission would like
to have a monun-tent made listing the names of the thirty-nine Beaumont soldiers in their honor.
5
I listoric Lajidmark Commissioll
April 10, 2023
Councilineiiiber Mike Getz., 7950 Phelan Boulevard, Beatimont , Texas addressed the Commission.
Councilman Getz thanked the Jefferson County Historical Commission for bringing awareness to
the need of moving the monument to a more visible location. He further stated the he supports
moving the nionument to the Temple to the Brave located at Pipkin Park, which was built and
dedicated by the Daughters of the American Revolution in memorial of those who lost their lives
in World War 1. He a] so stated that World War I artifacts are located at the site and is open to the
public a few days throughout each year and by appointment. Councilman Getz stated that the
pedestal to the statue of George O'Brien Mallard currently located at Pipkin Park will be relocated
making its site a good location for the World War I monument. He further stated the Pipkin Park
location is ideal being that it is City -owned property, rather than private property. He also stated it
could become problematic if a City -owned monument is placed on private property.
Bruce Hamilton, 7730 Chelsea Place, Beaumont, Texas addressed the Commission. Mr. Hamilton
stated that the Jefferson County Historical Commission considered relocating the monument to
Pipkin Park, howevcr, the World War I monument will be less impressive due to the Temple to
the Brave already being located at Pipkin Park. He further stated that most. of the Veterans are
buried at Magnolia Cemetery and nearby cemeteries, therefore, Magnolia Cemetery is an
appropriate location for the monument.
Kelli Maness,, President of Magnolia Cemetery, 25 Bellchase Gardens Drive, Beaumont, Texas
addressed the Commission. Ms. Maness stated that most are unaware of the World War I
nionument as it is not visible at the present location and should be relocated to Magnolia Cemetery
where it will be cared for. She further addressed the location of the proposed ledger that will
contain the names of the thirty-nine Beaumont men that died in WWI.
Con-irnissioner Goodness moved to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
relocate a World War I monument, as requested in file PZ2023-137.
Commissioner Crawford seconded the motion. The motion to approve the rcquest carried 8:0.
6) PZ2023-138-0 A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove window grids or
match lower level grids.
Applicant: Jennifer Stinuiiel for Shirley Boone
Location-. 615 N Fifth Street
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff report. Jemilfer Stimmel, on behalf of Shirley Boone, seeks
permission to replace twenty (20) windows on the Mess house located at 615 North Fifth
Street. The request is to remove the grids from the windows oil the second story, or to match
the grids to the first floor of the structure.
This home is categorized as a Prairie house. Examples for this style of home are located in
A Fi ield Guicle to Atnerican Houses (McAlester ct al., pgs. 444-45 1). The request to remove
the grids seems inappropriate with the examples given. rl"he request to match the first floor
grids appears appropriate as a number of examples provide matching windows throughout
the structure.
on
Historic Landmark Commission
April 10, 2023
'his house is in In the 1990 SPARE Beaumont Survey. SPARE states the house was built c.
1912. The buildings significance is listed as, the house is the only example of Prairie style
architecture in Bcaumont. The house was originally owned by Harry Wiess founder of
Humble Oil and Refining Company (now Exxon Corporation). The house has HC
designation. The house was built by a prote"ge" of Frank Lloyd Wright at I-I.C. Banker and
company, Architects.
Staff recommended approval of the request to match the first. floor grids with the following
conditions:
1. Shall obtain all necessary building permits from the Building Codes.
2. Any replacement of trim shall inatch existing color scheme of the structure.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
Brief discussion followed conceming, the location of the windows to be replaced. Mrs. Luckey
stated that new windows are available for purchase and the property owner is awaiting the
Commission's decision prior to placing the order.
The applicants were not present.
Commissioner Templeton moved to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
match the first floor grids, as requested in file PZ2023-138, with the following conditions:
1. Shall obtain all necessary building permits from the Building Codes.
2. Any replacement of trim shall match existing color sCher of the structure.
Commissioner Sigee seconded the motion. The motion to approve the request carried 8:0.
7) PZ2023-158: A rcquest for a Certificate of Appropriateness to support a designation for a
State Historical Marker.
Applicant: City of Beauniont
Location: 500 Main Street
Mrs. Luckey presented the staff report. The City of Beauniont, with the Jefferson County Historical
Commission and the family of George O'Brien Millard, are seeking support. in a designation
request for a State Historical Markcr. 'I"he designation request is for the statue of (ireorge O'Brien
Millard, located at the comer of Bowie Street and Pearl Street.., also known as 500 Main Street.
George O'Brien Millard was once listed in the Beautnont Enferl)rise, as "perhaps the most beloved
man in Beaumont". He was a dedicated member of the First Methodist Church and served two
terms as an Alderman for the City of Beaumont. He spent his retirement advocating for
improvements to the public school system, and was benefited the credit of "Beaumont's splendid
school systems."
Historic Landmark Cojimiissioii
April 10, 2023
The Statue cast in Bronze, was crafted by Pompeo Coppini in 1912, just two years after Millard's
unthnely death. The seven foot (7') tall statue was -unveiled in front of the "Millard Elementary"
school, named in honor of Millard. The statue was moved to pippin Park sometime after the closing
of the school. In 1999 The Texas Historical Commission armounced that the bronze statue was in
desperate need of restoration.., an art conservation group evaluated the statue,, cleaned and made
small repairs to the statue. In 2010 artist, Ron Petitt suggested moving the sculpture to its new
location at the Art Museum of Southeast Texas. `Fhc statue was ren-toved from its original granite
base and fully restored.
Staff recommended approval of the reqUeSt.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
Brief discussion followed concerning the statue marker dedication application deadline, the
families desire to relocate the base from Pipkin Park to the grounds of the Art Museum of Southeast
T exas, and the Sculptor of the statue.
Jennifer Trenbeath, Jefferson County Historical Commission Coordinator and descendant of
George O'Brien Millard, 2020 Chevy Chase Lane, Beaumont, "Pe as addressed the Commission.
Ms. Trenbeath stated that the State Historical Marker is in-iportant in explaining Mr. Millard's
in-ipact on the community.
Commissioner Templeton moved to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
support a designation for a State Historical Marker, as requested in file PZ2023-138.
Commissioner Goodness seconded the motion. The motion to approve the request carried 8:0.
HISTORIC DISTIdCT CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT
Mrs. Luckey presented the Historic District Code Enforcement Report, including information
about current violations and inspections.
OTHER BUSINESS
I ) Discuss administrative reviews for hog wire fellces within The Oaks Historic District.
Mrs. Luckey stated that the number of requests for he wire fences is increasing. Discussion
follo-wed concerning the Commission reviewing each request individually or allowing Planning
Staff to review each request administratively with any extenuating circumstances being presented
to the Commission. The recommendation before the Commission was for minimum requirements
of an unobstructed view four foot treated wood fence with any paint color requests in keeping with
current Historic Landmark District color requirements be reviewed by Staff administratively. 'Fhe
F*101
Historic Landniark Conimissioll
April 10, 2023
recommendation for minimum requirements of an unobstructed view four foot treated wood fence
to be reviewed by Staff with any variations to be presented to the Commission for consideraboll
carried 8: 0.
2) Commissioner Crawford discussed the need for notifying The Oaks Historic District
liomeowners. of Historic Landmark District rule and regulations. Staff advised the Commissioii of
steps in taken to better inform residents of the rules and regulations.
THERE BEINC'F NO OTHER BUSINESS, THE MEE TING WAS ADJOURNED A"I" 4:34
P.M.
WO
DATE: May QL2O23
TO: Historic Landmark Commission
FROM. E|aynaLuckey, Planner |
SUBJECT: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to keep a porch.
FILE: PZ2023-101
STAFF REPORT
Property owner, Pat Jones, requests permission tokeep aside entry porch tothe structure
located at2]8GRusk Street. |nNovember 2O22aCertificate ofAppropriateness was issued for
the leveling of the structure. Once the structure was leveled, the existing steps tothe side entry
were no longer usable as they did not reach the door for safe entry. On February 23 rd Inspector
Randle noticed asmall porch with alanding and steps was constructed without the benefit of
an approved Certificate of Appropriateness or Building Permits.
The structure is categorized as a Colonial Revival, with the asymmetrical fagade of the porch..
The economic depression ofthe 193[ysand changing postwar fashions led tosimplifications of
the design leaving out traditional grandeur details. Side entries appear to be common for most
Colonial Revival styles. Information and examples can be seen in A Field Guide to American
Houses (McAlester et al., pgs. 321-330).
Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. All applicable permits and inspections be obtained through the Building Codes
Department.
2. Porch shall be painted to match the house.
The property isinthe l989and l89OSPARE Beaumont Survey. SPARE states the house was
built circa 1930. The buildings significance listed as, the house is an example of middle class
housing built )nthe I93O�.
Exhibits are attached.
McAlester, VIrgin! a& Lee. A Field Gulde to A n7ericon Houses. Alfred A, Knopf, Inc., 1984. Print.
6EAVMONT
Planning & Community Development
Case Type:Planning and Zoning Case Status: REVIEW
Case Sub Type: Certificate of Appropriateness Tag Name: added porches
Case #: PZ2023-101 Initiated On: 3/1/2023 2:48:04PM
Location: 2286 RUSK ST, BEAUMONT, 77701
Individuals listed on the record:
Applicant
ashley hernandez
1180 campus street
beaurnont, TX 77705
Home Phone -
Work Phone,
Cell Phone: 4094994625
E-Mail- ashleyherna504@gmail.com
Property Owner
Patrick jones Home Phone: 409 728 9735
2286 rusk Work Phone:
beaumont, tx 77701 Cell Phone:
E-Mail: pjones92004gyahoo.corn
Reason for Request of a Certificate of Constructed a side entry porch without permits. repaint structure to
Appropriateness match existing yellow and green.
Paint Y
New Construction Y
Demo N
FenGing N
Miscellaneous N
Has request been made before? N
If yes, d ate:
Notes: -
Date: 04/1412023, Written By: Elayna Luckey
The request to keep the constructed side entry, will go before the Historic Landmark Commission for approval.
The request to repaint the structure to match the existing yellow and green is approved.
40
This is not a building permit, additional permits may be required
for the proposed scope of work,
Case Type. Planning and Zoning Page I of 1
Case #: PZ2 023-101 Printed On: 4M412023
i r�� v�o�2
4� Pel a Ile w et 5
ve WA/ ( 't le-e
ivGhy �'(11 � �t
f a��o rm 1 n fa f�te- eY-l-% ef
ef 0 6 el )
eo e- -/' z4� j � ,�v
t /I
%k
tt-e 4,.--ety VV
�I' l V-N Wtc GUl C �l � �l �rU tv � r�- %� cc �� r��,l�. u 7` D(!� 1
p0 �C.yi S (�s' / I�� � �� C.t W �� � . 7 rU�'► i I �'(r ,�/1 !'%� ��%l I'�' (i �' '
G�IIUfS �1a f1C �/1�'I f r � y
4v, or
4 e6j �awef
�(U 1�75-�'. 9'J3S
00
2
ra
IF
If
qp
VIV
10
Ff
ropc
ri
PIT
IV
op
Mir
if r
lie
BEAUMONT, TEXAS HISTORIC SAES INVENTORY FORM - BEAUMONT HISTORICAL LANDkWK GOMMISSION
JEF
1. County JEFFERSON
City/Rural, BEAUMONT BHT
2. Name
Address 2286 Rusk
5. USGS Quad No. 3094- 1 Ll� Site No. 910
6. Date: Factual. Est. c. 1930
7. Architect/Builder
Contractor
3. owner Danna, Pauline 8. Styte/Type Colonial Revival
Address 21122 Park Villa Katy, TX, 77450
9. Original Use DOME STIC /Sin gte DwetHng.____
4. Block/Lot Parkdate Lot 9 Mock 19 SE 3-3 Present Use DOMESTIC/Sirs gte Owe( king
10. Description:
One story frame structure. Goble end and wing roof with asphalt shingles. Semi -circular Louvered vent in gable.
One one -over -one sash. Wood panel door with semi -circular transom and semi -circular pedimented portico supported
by two elbow brackets. One pair one -over -one sash. Aluminum siding. Ceinent pad and brick steps.
11. Present Condition Poor. Portico roof rotted. The use of modern mater j a I s sac r 1* f i ces t he arch i tec tura I i ntegr i ty of
the structure.
12. Significance:
The house is an example of middle class housing built in the 1930's.
13. Relationship to Site: Original
14. B i b L i og raphy
Moved Date (Describe Originak Site) A
15. Informant
16. Recorder S. Skarbowski Date 06-20-90
P140TO DATA
Black and White 35 mm negative
YEAR DRWR ROLL FRS ROLL FRW
90 1 1 12 30 to I I
I
I VIEW:
RECORDED BYO S. Skarbowsk!
0
DATE:
,windows rTtqurndy
- in adjacent p.,jis
facade normally with
syrnmttrically balanced
w;ndows and center
door (IM Commonly w4h
door off -center)
I I I PPFO ROOFIVITI 10 UT
F U U a- IV I DT I I 12ORC I I
0
)ages 3 3
%'Agcs 340-3
11 1 'T4 1
%J TI F Y I N (11 FEATU It I'S
A
ccentuated front door, normally with decorative crown (pediment) supported by pi-
lasters,
or extended forward and supported by slender columns to form entry porch;
doors commonly have overhead fanlights or sidelights; facade normally shows synir-netri-
cally balanced windows and center door (less commonly with door off -center); windows
with double -hung sashes, usually with multi -pane glazing in one or both sashes; win-
dows frequently in adjacent pairs.
plZINCPA I., SUBTYPES
Nine principal subtypes can be distinguished. Some examples may be almost identical to
their colonial (particularly Georgian and Adam) prototypes. Clues for distinguishing
Revival copies from. early originals are given below under Variants and Details.
ASYMMETRICAL -About io percent of Colonial Revival houses have asymmetrical facades, a
feature rarely seen on their colonial prototypes. These asymmetrical examples range
from rambling, free -form houses resembling the free classic Queen Anne style (see pages
276-9) to simple boxes with asymmetrical window or porch arrangements. Prior to i goo
this subtype accounted for about one-third of all Colonial Revival houses. After igio few
examples were constructed until the 1930s, when irregular facades reappeared with less
elaborate detailing. These were, in part, inspired by the desire for attached garages,
which were difficult to incorporate within a balanced facade.
HIPPED ROOFWITH FULL-W[DTH PORCH —About one-third of Colonial Revival houses built
before about 19 15 are of this subtype, which is sometimes called the Classic Box. These
have a one m
-story, full -width porch with classical columns, which is added to a symetri-
cal, two-story house of square or rectangular plan. Two-story pilasters are common at the
corners; dormers, hipped or gabled, are usually present. Doors may be centered or placed
to the side. These houses have both Neoclassical and Colonial Revival influences, but
lack the full -height porches of typical Neoclassical houses.
HIS ROOF WITHOUT FULL -WIDTH PORCH—AbOUt 2 5 percent of Colonial Revival houses
are simple two-story rectangular blocks with hipped roofs; porches are usually absent or,
if present, are merely small entry porches covering less than the full facade width. This
subtype, built throughout the Colonial Revival era, predominates before about 191o. On
early examples, the colonial detailing tended to be highly exaggerated and of awkward
321
Eclectic Houses: Colonial Revival
In the years beLNVeCn 188o and i goo the Colonial Revival movernent also influenced
two other architectural styles: Queen Anne and Shingle. In the Queen Anne this pro-
duced the free classic subtype, which grades into the closely related asymmetrical Colo-
nial Revival house. In the Shingle style, the shingled walls and rambling forms were
thought to evoke early shingled houses with shed and lean-to additions. Moreover, colo-
nial details such as Palladian windows were used in many examples.
The Philadelphia Centennial of 1876 is credited with first awakening an interest in
our colonial architectural heritage. In 1877 the fashionable architects McKim, Mead,
White, and Bigelow took a widely publicized tour through New England to study origi-
nal Georgian and Adam buildings at first hand. By 1886 they had executed two landmark
houses in the style —the Appleton House (1883-84) in Lennox, Massachusetts, and the
Taylor House (1885-86) in Newport, Rhode Island. These important examples typify
the two subtypes that were most common before 191o: the asymmetrical form with su-
perimposed colonial details and the inure authentic symmetrical hipped roof shape; de-
tails in both tended to have exaggerated proportions.
These early examples of Colonial Revival were rarely historically correct copies but
were instead free interpretations with details inspired by colonial precedents. During the
first decade of this century, Colonial Revival fashion shifted toward carefully researched
copies with more correct proportions and details. This was encouraged by new methods
of printing that perirnitted wide dissemination of photographs in book s and periodicals.
In 1898 The me?- can' A2-chitect and Building News began an extensive series called
i'Thc Georgian Period: Being photographs and measured drawings of Colonial Work
with text." This was joined in x91S by the White Pine Series of A-rchit eclural Mono-
g?-aphs, which was dominated by photographs of colonial buildings. These and similar
ventures led to a wide understanding of the prototypes on which the Revival was based.
Colonial Revival houses built in the years between 1915 and 1935 reflect these influences
by more closely resembling early prototypes than did those built earlier or later, The
economic depression of the 1930s, World War 11, and changing postwar fashions led to a
simplification of the style in the 1940s and 'Sos, These later examples are most often of
the side -gabled type, with simple stylized door surrounds, cornices, or other details that
merely suggest their colonial precedents rather than closely mirroring them.
326 Colonial Revival
DATE: May8, 2023
TO: Historic Landmark Commission
FROKU. ElaynaLuckpu Planner
SUBJECT: Arequest for aCertificate ofAppropriateness tokeep pillars and gable detail.
FILE: PZ2023-142
STAFF REPORT
Applicant, Jennifer Rocha, requests permission to keep newly installed square pillars and an
added gable detail tothe structure located atZS9BHazel Avenue. OnJanuary 3O~'Inspector
Randle noticed the completed alterations without the benefit of an approved Certificate of
Appropriateness or Building Permits. A notice of violation was issued, and the applicant came in
to submit the request to keep the eighty seven inch (87") square pillars and the newly added
gable detail. Please see a visual reference of the aforementioned located in your packets.
The structure [scategorized asaColonial Revival. Structures featuring side gabled roofs
typically had prominently displayed entries with pillars and gables. Examples can be seen in ,4
Field Guide to American Houses (M cAl este r et a I., p gs. 3 21-33 9).
Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. 1. All applicable permits and inspections be obtained throuSh the Building Codes
Department.
2. The pillars and gable detail be painted to match the house.
The property )sinthe 1B9Oand 1D89 SPARE Beaumont Survey. SPARE states the house was
built circa 1930. The buildings significance listed as, the house is an example of middle class
housing built inthe 193O's.
Exhibits are attached.
McAlester, Virginia & Lee. A Field Guide to Arnefican House.5. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1984. Print.
B EAV MO NT
Planning & Community Development
Case Type:Planning and Zoning Case Status: REVIEW
Case Sub Type: Certificate of Appropriateness Tag Name: added gable
Case #: PZ2023-142 Initiated On: 3/24/2023 1:45,59PM
Location: 2598 HAZELAVE, BEAUT, TX
Individuals listed on the record:
Applicant
Jennifer Rocha Home Phone:
2 59 8 Hazel Avenue Work Phone:
Beaumont, TX 77702 Cell Phone- 4092256936
E-mail: rochajenn26@yahoo.com
Reason for Request of a Certificate of Replacing porch posts to replace rotted wood, height of 87 inches
Appropriateness each from round pillars to square pillars, added gable detail.
Paint N
New Construction N
Demo N
Fencing N
MiscelllaneOLIS Y
Has request been made before? N
If yes, date:
Notes:
This is not a building permit, additional permits maybe required
for the proposed scope of work.
Case Type: Planning and Zoning Page 1 of I
Case #: PZ2023-142 Printed Cn* 4/1412023
:�4 T
0 WRIM,671 e
N 149
-e Pf-
M,
IiJIMYO 2
e. a
" w1m.;
PIP
N
UMd-fttes
Ad,
ar r
If L If I
'410
MEN
4A
s FIX L z_4
LA
k Low,
—BIWA
j
L
%
p
L
MIdR
4 ' 3
L
owl
4
-A
le
j 46
ow
L Q t
J-1
%
ri V
91 4 —
%
IF k
ck.
it r
47
t
:rp 7.
.7
dd: 'g.
;A- L
or
jd�
1 7ti A, b19 r 1k
It
Olt
A
_21k. J,
4
vv
C,
P A III 1 42 7r, ,1, 0 -P
31 N
M_7�,
- WIA,
2-1
NEW
AEF%M �
in
16
4
d "jr L v,
0I RL 1
VF
L 4F
4P
oll
;F, OF Ik
k
jp I
10-
1/ 7:clj - III
4L.
III Lan
55r, q
"A
j
41!�
d
If
L
13
It, 6
- A
Vi,
jr 4
. V
j L
Z
�kL
41`
Ar
4r P
A
IL
L
r",e
it
S
16
7
r
�j
7
L A:.J
—7
s21JLIIIi 4*1
BEAUMONT, TEXAS HISTORIG STTES INVENTORY FORM - BEAUNT HISTORICAL LANDMARK COMMISSION
1 County JEFFERSON JEF 5. USGS Quad No. 3094-112 Site No. 1777
City/RuraL BEAUMONT BMT
6. Date. Factual Est. 1930
2. Name
Address 2598 hazel Avenue 7. Architect/BuiLder
Contractor
3. Owner ELizabeth Haynie 8. Sty Le/Type Colonial Revivai
Address 2598 Hazel Avenue, Beaumont 77702-1608 9. Original Use DOMESTIC-Singte Dwelting
4. BLock/Lot Averitt, Add. Lots 14-15 Vock 41 SE 1-2 Present Use DOMESTIC -Single DweUing
10. Description:
Two story, side gable, asphalt shingles, ceramic brick chimney, vinyl siding, 5 second story 6/6 sash shuttered
windows, off -center rectangutar pediment with round Rasters, soLid wood door, 5-tight transom, two 6/6 shuttered
sash windows and two 15-Light shuttered windows to the side of door, 1 story wing with paired 10-Light French
windows and 16/6 shuttered sash window, brick foundation,
11. Present Condition
12. Significance:
An example of a CoLoniat, Revival. house buRt in the 1930's.
13. Relationship to Site: Original. Moved Date (Describe Original, Site)
14. Bibtiography 15. Informant
16. Recorder Le tie Sharp Date 07-11-91
PHOTO DATA
Mack aW White 35 mm negative
YEAR DRWR ROLL FRXE ROLL FRKE
91 19, 16 to
VIEW: S. Facade
RECORDED BY: Leslie Sharp
DATE: 07-11-91
si='M' fax wm=
Eclectic Houses: Colonial Revival
SIDE -GABLED ROOF
1. Baltimore, Maryland; ca. 19 to. A very simple, twee -ranked example.
2. Louisville, Kentucky; 2920S. Side porches are common an Colonial
Revival houses (see fig"Fes 3, 4, and 7)-
3. Louisville, Kentucky; ig3os. Another Regency house (see also page
331, Figure 6). This type of inctal entry porclt,with a canopy roof is a char-
actcristic. Regency feature.
4. Kansas City, MiSSOUTi; igios. Although at first glance this looks like
an accurate copy, the roof overhang is too wide and the windows too broad
for an original colonial house.
S. Clevc] and, Ohio; i 9;ias. The entry porch with a curved underside is a
favored Revival detail.
6. Dallas, Texas; 1941. Young House. Small round windows (above the
entry here and in the gable end of Figurc 3) were widely used in the late
1930s, 3 40s,and early 'Sos on Colonial Revival houses and on other SLYiCS.
'7. Dallas, Texas; iqiq.'f hornson House.'Thisexample was inspired by
the Middle Colonies Georgian house. Note the gent roof and the hood over
the entry. The side porch to the left has a summer sleeping porch above
with windows on three sides. These were especially favored in the South
where they appear in many early loth -century styles.
8. Cambridge, Massachusetts; 1903, John W. Ames, architect. This
house demonstrates that reasonably accurate Colonial copies were being
designed in the early years of the Revival; those with exaggerated detailing
were, however, far more common.
9. L,ouisville, Kentucky; tqzos. The garden facade of a very large exam-
ple. Note the door surround with the pediment extending over the side-
lights but lacking a fanlight. Although this combination was never used in
colonial houses, the example here faithfully captures the spirit of a Geor-
gian or Adam doorway.
V-1
332 Colonial Revival
w�
DATE May 8L2O23
TO: Historic Landmark Commission
FROM: E|ayna Luckey, Planner
SUBJECT: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to resize windows.
FILE: PZ2023-147
STAFF REPORT
Property owner, Daniel Garcia,, requests permission to resize four (4) windows on the structure
located at5559thstreet. Mr. Garcia ls\nthe process ofrenovating the vacant structure and
would like resize one of the six by six windows on the south side to a three by six window. On
the front of the structure, there are two large six by six windows on either side of the front
door. Mr. Garcia would like to install two three by six windows within each of the six by six
openings. Finally, on the north side of the structure, there is a four by six window he would like
to rep/ace with a three bysix window. The proposed windows will be white, and six over six in
The structure could be categorizedaseNational horne,with the gabled pyramidal roof and
nearly square plan, The style was popular in the south during the 1900's to 30"S with Colonial
Revival, Tudor, and craftsman styles, however many remained simple folk forms lacking
fashionable details. Examples of such can be seen in A Field Guide to American Houses
(McAlester et al., pgs. lOO lOI\.
Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. All applicable permits and inspections be obtained through the Building Codes
Department.
2. Any siding installed will be painted to match the existing structure.
The property is not listed in the SPARE Beaumont survey.
Exhibits are attached.
McAlester, Virginia & Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, Iric., 1984. Print.
BEAUMONT
Planning Community Development
Case Type:Planning and Zoning Case Status: REViEW
Case Sub Type: Certificate of Appropriateness Tag Name: leveling painting
Case #: PZ2023-147 Initiated On: 3129/2023 3:12:54PM
Location: 555 9TH ST, BEAUMONT, 77702
Individuals listed on the record:
Applicant
daniel garcia Home Phone*
2335 North st Work Phone:
Beaumont, TX 77702 Cell Phone: 409 4349953
E-Mail: dgalexdg93@gmaii.com
Agent
daniel garcia
2335 North st
Beaumont, TX 77702
Home Phone:
Work Phone,
Cell Phone, 409 4349953
E-Mail: dgalexdg93@gmail.corn
Property Owner
daniel garcia Horne Phone,
2335 North st Work Phone:
Beaurnont, TX 77702 Cell Phone: 409 4349953
E-Mail: dgalexdg93@gmail.com
Reason for Request of a Certificate of leve I structure, repair siding to match, re roof to black shingles, paint
Appropriateness structure to match, replacelresize 4 windows to smaller.
Paint Y
New Construction N
Demo N
Fencing N
Miscellaneous Y
Has request been made before? N
If yes, date:
Notes:
This is not a building permit, additional permits may be required
for the proposed scope of work.
t
Case Type- Planning and Zoning Page I of 1
Case #. PZ2023-147 Printed On: 4/11/2023
**EXTERNAL** Re: PZ2023-147 - request to resize windows
Daniel Garcia <dgaIexdg93@gnnaiI.com>
Wed 4/19/2023 10:03 AM
To: Elwyn a Luckey < Elaynaluckey@ Beau rnontTexas-gov>
0 4 attachments (6 MB)
IMG-9819.jpeg; IMC;-4513jpeg; IMG-9813.jpeg; ReSi7ed20230419094735-jpeg;
Good morning Elayna,
We have a total of five windows that are going to be replaced. The measurements for those are, 4-
6'x6'and 1-4'x6'.
On the left side there are two large 6 x 6 windows but we would like to cancel one of them and put
one 3 x 6 window. The front side of the house. There are two large windows one on each side of the
front door we would like to put two 3 x 6 windows on each side of the door and on the right side of
the hoy we have one 4 x 6 window that would be replaced by a 3 x 6 window. I will attach some
pictures below to help. Also, I will put a picture of what it would look like with the double w'ndows
when completed.
4
! 9
`f
9
IN
IL 4r
16
y }
_
'
d
km
-Dr-
kZ
_
a
. � '`ram . �e � � • •
ram.
ex MAL"
tL
I YAP; 29
VINILO
Vanf.mna do
fibartur-1 SIMP 10
Fj 79fe
Ily erfeir i 1. 0 Mrslo
kill
to 0
T-- IMF
li
oil
Wo!
k7�
WM=MWqlENR"R
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 8:25 AM Elayna Luckey < Elawalucke Pbeaumonttexas,ggv> wrote:
C
Good morning,
Foolk Howes: National
PYRAMIDAL FAMILY
Massed -plan folk houses of rectangular shape are normally covered by side -gabled roofs.
Those with more nearly square plans, in contrast, are commonly built with pyramidal
(equilateral hipped) roofs, which require more complex roof framing but need fewer
long -spanning rafters, and thus are less expensive to build. Such roofs appeared on 11-1od-
est folk houses earlier in the post -railroad era than did the side -gabled. form. In the south,
one-story, pyramidal houses became a popular replacement for the less spacious hall -
and -parlor house during the early decades of the 20tilcentury. Or pyramidals are
less common in the northern and midwestern states but are joined there by two-story
examples, which similarly began to replace the traditional but less spacious rural 1-houses
of the region in the years from about 1905 to 193o. During the same period these two-
story, pyramidal houses also became a popular urban house form throughout the coun-
try. Most urban examples were built with Colonial Revival, Neoclassical, Prairie, Tudor,
or Craftsman stylistic detailing, but many also remained simple folk forms which lacked
such fashionable details.
Like their side -gabled relatives, pyramidal folk houses differ principally in roof pitch
and in the size and placement of porches.
too National
by side -gabled roofs,
built with pyramidal
ming but need fewer
ofs appeared on mod-
ed form. In the south,
he less spacious hall-
: -story pyramidats are
!d there by two-story
pacious rural I -houses
me period these two -
throughout the coun-
_Ssical, Prairie, Tudor,
.k forms which lacked
incipally in roof pitch
F-
pyRAN11DAL FAMILY
i. stiffivater, Oklahoma; ca. 1935-
Coffcc_ County, Alabama; ca. 1905.
Greene County, Georgia; ca. igoo. Note the very steeply pitched
Such roofs are common on early southern examples; they may have
been i n avenced by earlier roofs of similar shape built by French descend -
the Gulf Coast region.
4. Gwinnett County, Georgia; ca. ig2o. Men y one-story pyramidals
full or partial integral porches included under the principal roof.
Li'mporia, Kansas; ca. i9iS. Such two-story pyramidals were a domi-
nont urban form in the early decades of the century. Most urbart examples
h2d stylistic detailing but some, like this one, were unadorned folk houses.
,-he metal storm windows are a later addition.
6. Cabarrus COMILY, Norrh Carolina; C2. igoo. An unusually large two-
story example.
2
r
N"
U
IL
:
Yr
4k 0
J W
11
National 101
DATE: May Ei2OZ3
TO: Historic Landmark Commission
FROM: BaynaLuckey, Planner (
SUBJECT: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to support an application for a
State Historical Designation and National Register of Historic Places and
placement of markers.
STAFF REPORT
Applicant, Chad Myzell with The Plpkin Park Honor Guard along with the Jefferson County
Historical Commission, are seeking support for a State Historical Designation, placing The
Temple tothe Brave onthe National Register ofH|siodcP|acesandinstallinQthernarkersatthe
Temple inPmkinPark, located atl35OPennsylvania.
|n19Blthe Colonel George Moffet Chapter ofthe National Society of the Daughters of
American Revolution ("DAR") had the temple constructed with funds raised to celebrate the
ending of World War 1. The temple was dedicated in 1932 to celebrate the date of the British
surrender to George Washington. The temple is currently used as a museum and is open by
appointment, or on patriotic holidays. The site houses the Texas Historical Marker honoring
"Jean Baptiste (Jonas) ChaIson" marker, placed at the park in 1976. The temple was recognized
in 2003 as a DAR Historical monument. In 2007, the DAR coordinated a campaign where the
windows, and vva1|s were repaired, and an UVACoyatern was installed, the temple was also
to
rededicated that year on its 75 anniversary.
The property is not listed in the SPARE Beaumont Surverys.
Staff recornmends approval of the request.
Exhibits are attached.
SEAUMONT
Planning & Community Development
Case Type:Planning and Zoning Case StatLIS: REVIEW
Case Sub Type: Certificate of Appropriateness Tag Name: TX and US Historic Register (Temple To
Case ff: PZ2023-148 The Brave)
Location: 340 EMMETT AVE, BEAUMONT, TX Initiated On: 3/29/2023 8,06,14PN4
Itidividuals listed oti the record:
Applicant
Chad Myzell Home Phone:
735 Shakespeare Drive Work Phone:
Beaumont, TX 77701 Cell Phone- 4092671821
E-Mail: ckmyz06@grnail.com
Agent
Chad Myzell
735 Shakespeare Drive
Beaumont, TX 77701
Home Phone,
Work Phone:
Cell Phone: 4092671821
E-Mail: ckmyz06@gm.aTcom
Property Owner
The City Of Beaumont Home Phone: 4098803708
801 Main, Suite 320 Work Phone:
Beaumont, TX 77701 Cell Phone,
E-Mail:
Kenneth.Williams@beaui,nonttexas.gov
Reason for Request of a Certificate of Approval to nominate the Temple To The Brave for the State and
Appropriateness National Historic Register.
Paint N
New Construction N
Demo N
Fencing N
Miscellaneous Y
alas -request been made before? N
If yes, date:
Notes:
This is not a building Permit, additional permits may be required
for the proposed scope of work.
Case Type: Planning and Zoning Page i of I
Case #: PZ2023-148 Printed On: 4/11/2023
Pip1jin Paj4k Honor Guard
1320 Pemisylvania Ave
Beaumont, TX 77701
ckm y zO 6na. am al 1. co Ili
Texas Historical Commission
National Register Coordinator
P.O. Box 12276
Austin, TX 78711-2276
January 24, 2023
Dear National Register Coordinator:
The Pi kin Park Honor Guard writes to you today to request consideration of the Temple to the Brave for
the National Register of Historic Places.
World War I was thought to be the war to end all wars by many residents of Beauniont, Texas and the
country. To celebrate the ending of World War I, the, Colonel George Moffett Chaj)ter of the National
S o ciety of the Daughters of the A nierican Revolution "DAR" ral I i ed the com mun ity to donate towards the
creation of a temple. Despite it being the time of "The Great Depression,"' there was a fervor of Patriotisni
among the citizens and they donated enough funds to construct the Teipple in 193 1. Since its opening and
to this day, the Temple serves as a War Museum which is open to the public on Patriotic Holidays or by
appointment and includes war niemorabilia.
Please find included:
Current Photographs (pages 1-4)
Significant Dates (page 5)
Historical Overview (page 6)
o Current and Historical Maps and Plans (page 7)
•Historic Photographs (page 8)
We appreciate your consideration and look forward to working with you to pursue this listing for our site.
Sincerely,
Chad Myzell
Coordinator, Pipkin Park Honor Guard
409.267,1821
ckniyzWd�aniafl.coni
Current Photographs
Above: Southeast side of the Temple To The Brave with DAR Stone
Below: Jean Baptiste Chaison Texas Historic plaque, 1976
Above: Northeast side of the Temple To The Brave
Below Southwest side of the Temple To The Brave
Left: Northwest side of the Temple To The Brave
I r"
Right: Memos* on Northwest side of the Tempte i.,o The Brave
Middle: Southwest Interior of the Temple To The Brave
-Right.- Northeast Interior of the Temple To The Brave
Left: Southeast Stained Glass Window of the Temple To The Brave
Right: Northwest Stained Glass Window of the Temple To The Brave
Significant Dates
The property where the Temple To The Brave is located was purchased in 1919 by the City of Beaumont
to be used as a city park. The park was named "Steve Pipkin ParW' in honor of prominent Citizen
"Stephen Walker Pipkin" in 1920 who had been instrumental in the purchase of the land for the park. In
2003,, city management suggested that Pipkin Park be sold along with other small parks with low usage
but the idea was rejected by City Council. Try 2007 the park was renamed to "Pipkin Patriots Park"' at the
request of the DAR. In 2019, a District Boy Scout Honor Guard was formed and was named "The Pipkiii
Park Honor Gijard" using the park's namesake as a tribute to the location that is the home of the Temple
To The Brave.
A Revolutionary Soldier Jean Baptist ha son was buried in the Jirou Cemetery where the DAR placed a
memorial stone in 1944. In 1969, the stone was relocated to the Southeast side of the temple by the DAR
after it was removed from the cemetery due to construction of a church. In 1976, aTexas Historical
Marker honoritig Cliaison was placed near the stone of the temple.
Eagle Scout Ezeuiel Uribe who is the grandson of the Premple's curator Dennis White, constructed a stone
Veterans Memorial in 2020 to memorialize all wars which is placed on the Northwest side of the Temple.
The Daughters of the American Revolution Colonel George Moffett Chapter desired to build a temple to
memorialize World War I and obtained a city permit to construct the Temple in 193 1. Construction began
in the same year and the Temple was dedicated in 1932 on the date of British General Cornwallis
surrender to George Washington. In 1974, plexiglass was placed over broken windows. In 2003, the DAR
placed a marker on the Temple identifying it as a DAR Historical Monument. In 2007, the DAR
coordinated a repair campaign in which windows were repaired, walls replastered and HVAC added. In
that same year, the Temple was rededicated on its 75th aimiversary.
Historical Overview
The Temple To The Brave was and is still today a tribute to the military service members who are fighting
or who have fought for our freedom and to the desire for peace in the world. As wars become forgotten
and time marches forward, the Temple sex es as a reminder to us all to remember the past. "Those who
cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."' The significance of the Temple To The Brave is
demonstrated both by the physical building itself and the contents within it.
The historic Temple To The Brave with its stained glass windows, vaulted ceiling and stone exterior
showcases exceptional craftsmanship and design.
The Temple To "I"he Brave is a rare tangible reminder of wars that came before us and demonstrates what
can be done. when we work together. Businesses donated a majority of the materials for the cause and
organizations such as the DAR itself, Women's Clubs, American Legion and Boy Scouts of America
along with private citizens came together to make the initiative a reality.
The long-term goal of the Pipkin Park Honor Guard is to ensure the Temple remains relevant, adequately
supported and visible by the public. As a Property on the National Historic Registry, the Temple can be
eligible for meeting a requirement of the Anicrican Heritage Merit Badge and subsequently causing more
Youth to visit the Temple and learn about out war history.
Current and Historic Maps and Plans
AM V44 16 C
JO,5"4 CVJ A: L i CL 4% %LAI ht A
9
L'. "N AA E)
YLW UEX1?.4
0214jr
E)
TtXA5
kb -fte A--y'rza-1
I,,., aI Le's
It
UY.T171! -erg
96-.ct::� Temple To ThG Brave
C4A141JILA 0 Pwar,,Mr-&-M
1 W41P El
E)
14ug.vo k I IDM
Left: Mcip showing the location of the -'ieniple To _73-he Brave in the State of Texas
rni
Right- Map showin 4 Pr the location of the Temple To -i ne Brave in Beaumont
WL -Alpaj��
4V e. 14
at
.1 .-w
L
P
Above: Map showing the Temple To The Brave in the 1930s
Historic Photographs
OF t o fL
LeftL' Temple To The Brave, 1939
Right: Tern To The Biwve, 19 70s
F--1
T VIP
Left: Teinl-)Ie To The Bi-4ave, 1982
Right: Temple To The Brave, 2003
DATE: May 8., 2023
TO: Historic Landmark Commission
FROM. E|aynaLuckey, Planner l
SUBJECT: A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to reduce windows and construct a
new driveway.
z|LE: PZ2023-155
STAFF REPORT
Property owner, Pat Jones, requests permission toreduce the windows onthe east side ofthe
structure, and to remove the existing pavers to install a concrete driveway at 2565 Rusk Street.
Mr. Jones is in the process of renovating the vacant structure and would like to reduce the
current eight (8) windows located within the one room on the east side of the home to four (4).
The structure could be categorized as a Tudor home, with the steeply pitched gross gabled roof
and brick tabbed detailing along the door and attached side entry. The style was largely
constructed during the 1920Ys and 30ysvuith Colonial Revival homes. Examples of such can be
s ee n i n A Field Guide to American Houses (M cAl este r et a I., p.gs. 355--3 63).
Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. All applicable pernnits and inspections be obtained through the Building Codes
Department.
2. The new pavement of the drive shall not extend in front of the structure.
The property is not listed in the SPARE Beaumont survey.
Exhibits are attached.
BEAlJMC3NT
Planning & Community Development
Case Type:Planning and Zoning Case Status: PAY FEES
Case Sub Type: Certificate of Appropriateness Tag Marne: modify windows
Case #: PZ2023-155 Initiated On: 4/5/2023 11:28,31AM
Location. 2565 RUSK ST, BEAUMONT, 77702
Individuals listed on the record:
Applicant
patrick jones Home Phone:
900 Northwind Work Phone:
port arthur, TX 77640 Cell Phone, 4097289735
E-Mail: pjones92004@yahoo.com
Reason for ReqUeSt of a Certificate of
Appropriateness
Paint
New Construction
Demo
Fencing
Miscellaneous
Has request been made before?
If yes, date:
Notes:
replace in total 23 windows- request to remove a double window on
the east side and replace with singular window. Remove existing
pavers in driveway and replace with a concrete driveway from
approach to rear of structure in same path as pavers.
N
N
N
N
Y
N
This is not a building permit, additional permits may be required
for the proposed scope of work,
Case Type: Planning and Zoning Page I of I
Case #: PZ2023-155 Printed On: 4/11/2023
tA 6
n �r cam.
� TAC9
"'A
c R e m^ d ,
w�r
tA k
a,, cl
�j -� ��� o�-a � �-- •h �� do
OJL
�� ���G►t 7 �'rc C C/�? l� f 1
frv� f � law, W I ��
py
r all evy) e, f r-
Y/O t 'R Clio
7 a
0 V,..eA tp t
a1► �� d � o�r� �
A9 Ale r d
/
p�o�
�(� elf If em C)ff �f l U'GLt!u-j�i
r-e AA
r,t To,
qO
q(@ f'a12471Gem
9�,,� ��s�,�rsr�
2eun o� �fa�
i
e
f+
�.
EC LI'CTIC HOUSES
steeply pitched
root, usually
side -gabled (less
commonly hipped
or front -gabled)
tall, narrow
windows, commonly
in muliiple groups
and with mufti -
pane glazing
WOODEN WALL CLADDING
page j68
Tudor
1890-1940
IDENTIFYING FEATURES
Steeply pitched roof, usually side -gabled (less commonly lipped or front -gabled); fa-
cade dominated by one or more prominent cross gables, usually steeply pitched; decora-
tive (i.e., not structural) half-timbering present on about half of examples; tall, narrow
windows, usually in multiple groups and with multi -pane glazing; massive chimneys,
commonly crowned by decorative chimney pots.
PRINCIPAL SUBTYPES
Six principal subtypes can be distinguished:
STUCCO WALL CLADDING --A relatively small percentage of Tudor houses have stucco walls.
These are most common on modest examples built before the widespread adoption of
brick and stone veneering techniques in the 1920S. In the early decades of the century
wood -frame, houses could be most easily disguised as masonry by applying stucco clad-
ding over the wooden studs; many early Tudor houses used this technique, both with
and without false half-timbering.
BRICK WALL CLADDING —This is the most common Tudor subtype. Walls of solid brick rna-
sonry were son-ictimes used on landmark examples early in this century, but brick be-
canic the preferred wall finish for even the most modest Tudor cottages after masonry
veneering became widespread in the ig2os. Brick first -story walls are commonly con-
trasted with stone, stucco, or wooden claddings on principal gables or upper stories. False
half-timbering occurs on about half the houses in this style, with infilling of stucco or
brick between the timbers and, quite often, elaborate decorative patterns in the arrange-
nient of timbers or brick,
S*rONE WALL CLA DD ING--S tone trim is common on Tudor houses of all subtypes but only a
relatively sinall proportion have stone as the principal wall material. Like the ones Just
described, these were principally large landmark houses before 192o. During the 19208
and '30s, modest, stone -veneered cottages appeared. In this subtype, brick, stucco, or
wooden trim is frequent on gables or second stories, as is false half-timbering.
WOODEN WALL CLADDING Earlier American styles based on English Medieval Precedents
(Gothic Revival, Stick, Queen Anne) were executed predominantly in wood, whereas
principal walls with wooden cladding are uncommon on Tudor houses. Modest examples
are occasionally seen with weatherboard or shingled walls; stuccoed gables with half-tim-
bering may be added above.
355
:Ecleciic Houses: Tudor
on oneor two-story bays; si n -ail transoms are sometimes present above the main win -
down. Stone mullions may divide casements and transoms in high -style examples.
OTHER DETAILS —Use of a variety of wall materials is common, both for different vertical
ilj units and for different stories; patterned brickwork and stonework is common. Upper
j -9 C es -
stories and gable, may overhang lower stories. Castellated parapets are som time pr
ent. Front -facade porches are generally either small entry porches or are absent entirely.
i
Side porches are frequent.
1j11
OCCURRENCE
This dominant Style of domestic building was used for a large proportion of early 2oth
century suburban houses throughout the country. It was particularly fashionable during
the 192os and early '30s when only the Colonial Revival rivaled it in popularity as a ver-
nacular style.
II
COMMENTS
The popular nme for the style is historically imprecise, since relatively few examples
closely mimic the architectural characteristics of Tudor (early 16th-century) England.
Instead, the style is loosely based on a variety of late Medieval English prototypes, rang
ing ftiom. thatch -roofed folk cottages to grand manor houses. "nose traditions are freely
.nixed in their American Eclectic expressions but are united by an emphasis on steeply
pitched, front -facing gables which, although absent on many English prototypes, are al-
most universally present as a dominant facade element in Tudor houses. About half have
ornamental false half-timbering, a characteristic they share with some examples of the
earlier Stick and Queen Anne styles, which also drew heavily on Medieval English prece-
dent. Unlike these styles, which were usually executed with wooden (board or shingle)
wall cladding, most Tudor houses .Dave stucco, masonry, or masonry -veneered walls.
The earliest American houses in the style date from the late 19th century. These
tended to be architect --designed landmarks whi6, like the first American Queen Anne
nodcl-s,Ilan were pat-
y
houses built twenty years earlier, rather closely copied English i
terned after late Medieval buildings with Renaissance detailing that were popular during
—2za
the reigns of Elizabeth I (1558- 1603) and jarnes I ( 1603 S), the Elibethan and jaco.-
bean eras of English history. Architectural historians have proposed the contracted term
"Jacobethan" style for these early Tudor land 'Marks, Most fall into the parapeted gable
subtype described above.
The uncommon Tudor landmarks of the jacobethan type were joined in the decades
from 1900 to I by less pretentious Tudor houses which superimposed steep gables,
half-timbering, or other typical detailing upon otherwise symmetrical facades (most
commonly with full front gables). These modest early examples, unlike most Tudor.
houses, tend to have walls clad with weatherboard, shingles, or stucco (applied over
wooden lath), thus avoiding the expense of solid masonry construction. Still relatively
uncommon before World War 1, the style expanded explosively in popularity during the
ry
ig2os and '30s as masonry veneering techniques allowed even the most modest examples
to mitnic closely the brick and stone exteriors seen on English prototypes. They show
endless variations in overall shape and roof form and are most conveniently subdivided
on the basis of their dominant facade-naterials (brick, stone stucco, or wood). The style
eii
quickly faded from fashion in the late 193os but has become popular in scam what modi
fied form during the Neoectectie movement of the 1970s and '8os.
358
I
Lr,cleclic Houses: Tudor
S,I,ucco WALL CLADDING
i. Lexington, Kentucky; iq2os,
2. Ashtabula, Ohio, igios, Note the wall dormers, an unusual Tudor
feature, the brick tabbed door surround, the quoins and the chimney de-
tailing.
3. Louisville, Kentucky; igios. Such examples, with the dominant front
gable capped by a hip, suggest Continental, rather than British, precedents.
They were sometimes referrcd to as Germanic Cottages by eclectic build-
ers.
4. Cleveland, Ohio; 192os, This example retains the original roof of
rough -cut slate, Note the unusually low cave line and the massive front
chimneys.
S. Montgomery, Alabama; igios, Many early Tudor houses were sym-
marical- or nearly so, .as in this example.
6. Americus, Gcorgia;,jg2os.
7. Louisville, Kentucky; igios. Wymond House. This landmark exam-
ple has wood -shingle walls above the rough -finished stucco of the first
story. Note the multiple groups of casement windows and the shed dormer
to the left, contrasting with the hipped dort-ners on the right.
8. Pittsford, New York; 192os. Note the decorated vergeboards in the
gables and the second -story overhang above the entry. 2
360
4
7
I