HomeMy WebLinkAbout347-BA44W
Date: May 23, 1991
TO: Board of Adjustment
FROM. Planning Division
JI REQUESTED Consider an application for a special exception fft6in
ACTION: the building (yard) setback regulations of Sec. 30-25 B.3 for
industrial districts, as allowed under Sec. 30-37 E.2.(b)(3),
Applicant: Raymond Audilet. (Lots 9-11, Block "C", Mayfair
IP 2nd Addition),
*STAFF REPORT*
\STAFF RECOMMENDATION
0 i a 'ITV i
FILE #347-BA
w"Q)
J
11 )A'
J \) -1 9
I -RE #347-BA Page 2
.. r �. • my
Y-ILE 47-RA Page 3
FUE #347-BA
COMMONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SPECIAL EXCEMONS
Special Exceptions may be granted in the following situations -
Page 4
To reconstruct, extend or cniarge a building occupied by a nonconforming
use on the lot or tract occupied by such building, provided that the
reconstruction, extension, or enlargement does not prevent the return of
the property to a conforming use.
0
1) An exception from the front yard requirements where the actual
front yard setback of an abutting lot does not meet the front
yard requirement or a rear yard exception where the actual rear
yard setback of any four (4) or more lots in the same block do
not meet the rear yard requirements of these regulations.
4) An exception from the minimum front yard requirements tor
owner identification signs where a structure existing at the
effective date of this Chapter precludes locating a sign in
compliance with the setback regulation.
5) An exception from a minimum interior side yard setback
requirement for owner identification signs for existing businesses
which were developed prior to April 1, 1981, where there is no
safe place to erect a sign in compliance with the minimum
setback requirements. A condition for granting of the exception
is that the applicant must demonstrate that the sign shall not
screen or obstruct the view of an existing sign, building, or
outdoor display area.
6) An exception from the minimum side yard setback requirement
where a nonconforming building was in existence at the time
of the passage of this ordinance.
C) To waive or reduce off-street parking and loading requirements when
the Board finds the same are unnecessary for the proposed use of the
building or structure for which the special exception request applies.
SOURCE: City of Beaumont Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 30-37E.2.
F" #347-BA
ANALYSIS
Page S
Page 6
ME #347-BA
PUBLItvNOTMCATION
Page 7
Fur-- 3 4-1- SA
May 2, 1991
Board of Adjustment
City of Beaumont
RE: Application For Special Exceptions
Lots 9, 10 & 11, in Block "C", Mayfair 2nd Addition,
Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, 1075 Amelia and
two adjacent lots
Dear Sirs:
The subject property is zoned "Industrial", and it is directly
across the street from residential zoned properties. The required
city set back is 40, on the properties.
All lots, 9, 10 and 11, are currently being considered for
development as boat storage facilities, with access being from the
interior lot. For proper development, it is necessary that the set
back be changed to 51 for delivery purposes.
The change will not enhance traffic on Amelia Avenue.
All properties located in residential areas adjacent and
across from the subject property are 201 feet set back. All owners
will sign a consent for waiver.
The schedule for development will be as follows:
Lot 9 - immediately - for boat storage facility
Lot 10 - scheduled for prior to the end of
1991, to include storage facility and an
office.
Lot 11 - last to be developed - no definite
time scheduled, but as building program
completes.
The next lot used as industrial lot, Mallard & Mallard, has
a pipe rack built immediately on the lot line.
The use, of the property by your applicant will be uniform with
other industrial usages in the area and will not be a detriment to
public good and will not impair the general purpose and intent of
the comprehensive plan as established.
Yo rs truly, ry
-ru'LY
R oQ, d Audilet
1
AMAL IA A v i �jUE..
�.
I
04
-- - --d --
_ - - - __
T5e
rA) -_----------
l
SO 75�
225'
PLANNING FILE 2f47-BA