Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report DATE: October 18, 2021 TO: Planning Commission and City Council FROM: Chris Boone, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECT: To consider a request for a Revised Specific Use Permit to allow a new driveway in a GC-MD-2 (General Commercial—Multiple-Family Dwelling-2) District. FILE: PZ2021-304 STAFF REPORT Brian Dunigan is requesting a Specific Use Permit to allow a new driveway at 622 W. Lucas Drive. Given the multiple iterations of the proposed layout of this site, it is important to provide a chronology of the history to the project. In February of 2011, Darlene Hanna was approved for a revised Specific Use Permit at this location(see "Exhibit A"). The approved site plan did not have any driveways accessing the residential cul-de-sac to the east. In 2016 a driveway was poured for Quinchies without approval from planning. In December 2020 plans were submitted for preliminary review for the interior build-out of the cookie shop in question but did not reflect any additional driveways or curb cuts to the street to the east. The plans for the cookie shop were approved but conditioned as "Interior Only-SUP 2011". In February 2021 plans for a new driveway were submitted to Engineering staff for design review. The plans received a favorable review from Engineering but were never reviewed by Planning or Building Codes and no permit was ever issued for its construction. Later in February 2021, the plans for the cookie shop were formally submitted with a permit application for construction, with no indication of a new drive, curb cut or drive-through included in the request. The plans submitted with the permit application were reviewed and approved by all departments, but with the condition that the work would be "interior only" due to the SUP being site-plan specific. This information was also verbally conveyed to the applicant. The"interior-only"permit was issued on March 9, 2021. In July of this year, Mr. Dunigan was completing the buildout of a new cookie company, when he submitted plans for a permit for an additional driveway onto the north cul-de-sac behind the building for a new drive-through window. This permit for the new curb cut was denied as it was not shown on the approved 2011 SUP site plan. The applicant then applied for an amendment to the 2011 SUP to request approval of the new, second driveway way along with the Quinchies driveway(see "Exhibit B"). In August, City Council approved the amended SUP with the existing Quinchies driveway to the north but denied the new driveway. Mr. Dunigan is now requesting an amendment to the August 2021 SUP to reconfigure the interior parking and access drives and to build a driveway that will circle around the rear of the existing building,providing access to a new drive-through window on the rear of the building (see"Exhibit C"). No new curb cut to the residential street to the east is proposed but will utilize the existing curb cut. Engineering has reviewed the proposed layout and has no objections,provided the layout is designed to minimize traffic conflicts within the site. Staff recommends approval of the request with the following condition: 1. Drive way for drive-through must be one way only and parking lot should be marking with on-way arrows. 2. Pavement at the intersection of the two drives should be marked and signed to discourage the blocking of traffic coming from the new driveway 3. Driveway shall be a minimum of ten(10) feet in width Please note that final occupancy approval is subject to review and acceptance of submitted plans and field inspections to verify compliance with applicable codes. Exhibits are attached. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Notices mailed to property owners 16 Responses in Favor Responses in Opposition LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ORDINANCE PURPOSES Being Lots 9-13, Tract 1 and Lot 8, Tract 2, Block 1, Calder Highlands Addition, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, containing 1.06 acres, more or less. Exh t A Site plan approved in 2011 . 6 % ) ' 0 \ \- \ " \ 1(1 . • cOoll . ,,J , , * , • , , .7_, ___, , 0 0 4 00- ) r,, %, \ E iibit B - Site plan from August 2021 I • t' -. - E !,Y,y . ` . . 2016 "Quenchies" I • • \1 • ' driveway approved by i • City Council 8/2021. I r p r C it 1/4‘1 • r ,ti i I : It ' II. 1 . ' • .� \ Cookie company I I j '. driveway denied I N 8/2021. ♦' I i-- . • itl ; . .1. ;. .li .;.IN i . . ii ��,'i cam, \ I ; �} • . I � 1 ��' I • i r, , 7 �i i r ,a ; I ► A. �� . ! 1 `. I �} 1 ,. ., , , • „ ,, , , . .., . • . . k 1 4 " 4-11 1 ' ,it \-- ;\'' 11.--- EXHIBIT"B" Exhibit - Current request POW OF 001.1101. L._ poen or _I Prom,1/7 EAST 166.55 WON•00 EAST nose iZ.54' 6651' . ♦59'06'43"6 69"' LOT 13 LO- 13 lG 9 S O,P +� `cam Cee 4.1Ilk i r i, LOT 12 LOT 12 V"-\ le (31 uw[a t __iiiiiiiallits,-(4 .,.1: .tea_... LOT 11 4. CT 1 i tL�` AC. �.0 7ouo A' \ I. i • 1.1157 ACRES s'/\ LOT 10 / 0 10 \ S , z- y1y-/ r-14 5 1 as. ... _ ret a 600 LOT 9 i '_CT 9 , gt re..yr i I--.LOT 6 \ o 1 I N 77,214r .7T ' /W 1�3e I / i S 66'46'36"W 67.32' U J Lora 2.;,0,:9;,'>o F / ea., o NUMBER DELTA RADIUS' ARC. CHOW BEARMO f / LOT 2 U C 7N Cl 0311'il. 1071.14 59.37 SCSI S 3117'06"E / j 62 4294'32" �45.00 33.16 32.43 S 10'42'533 W 1 J 53 '35.51'51' 45.00 20.17 Z7.71 S 31 0440"E / LO r U (per? IA)•La c t j Dr;\e my Pict n5 ,",. ..,10..z.IPA:000.[,7. .r F.K..1r•nil:OwNONT ...i.01•f 00 MC,.0.xa.11 /�n\ . 20 0 20 40 60 *Ail—•,11•11•11111 •-Ill.Ill"..44.4 .—«+.r0r.1.0 Scale 1" = 20' .Current site plan with Engineering DE Irtment mark-ups t^to r P.PPE "Maltat 11Z_____ +�M' a„ raw 1.(+WYb 645 a IEoewall NMNt Y 11011 N ) /'MJV iz 1401.MI _�, EAST 166.55' _ ill EAST ..38' 66 0" S H9'OB' E 6/•'' 12 54 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE PAINTED IN A MANNER TO DISCOURAGE OUENCHIES'CUSTOMERS FROM BLOCKING `0T 1 3 LOT 13' THE EXIT OF THE PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU $L / C`C). EXISTING'ENTRANCE ONLY"DRIVEWAY `Y APPROACH TO REMAIN AS-IS - • 21, 4 I i I I sr • • `� wa.� V APPROX.LOCATION OF 1 �70 LOT 12 'QUENCHIES'EXISTING LOT I? ` '� 1 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW TO REMAIN � PA V • X PROPOSED STOP SIGN FACING SOUTH WITH I'p ' `� ADDITIONAL SIGN PROHIBITING RIGHT TURNS } 1 • LOT 11 1 W \ wtu6R�K L, • � 4-- CTti 11 t. PROPOSED ASPHALT _ ,_ •• DRIVE-THRU LANE(10'x 100') I 7 vs RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 .457 ACRES ./ \., . a4 , , — �, . . LOT 1 O DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW 10 FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU.NOT S _ t--' 11111P REPRESENTATIVE OF PROPOSED I4' ' PAVEMENT MARKINGS. Ong • / LOT 9 ALL EXISTING PARKING i I LOT 9 \ SPACES TO REMAIN b _ 'tea 2 POR -� k)T/ =77"=71 x lssE�wt�1 �, Z.�.o- • 1 , O l�) 6. U "roe OT�@ C. per' N \` S 66'46'36"W 67.32' LOT q l KE.0::riiw U I / 1 Ca NUMBER DELTA RADIUS' ARC' CHORD'CHORD BEARING / • LOT 2 U Cl 0311.11" 1071.14 56.57 59.56 5 3(17'08"E C2 4214'52" 45.00 33.16 3243 S 10'42'53"6' J C3 35'31'S1" 45.00 26.17 27.71 5 31.04'40"E / Lor (p 2 LA)•1i.�c .— / V` 1\l' \/ 'Ph r IS .px r.41 t7 rf roV.ERS volt IIIE F-X01 O 4 1�15:GwnRMI • /4\ . 20 0 20 40_60 I.-w a �M Scale 1" = 20' ANALYSIS CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (SECTION 28-26.E,ZONING ORDINANCE) Application Application is in is not in Comments compliance compliance Attached Conditions: 1. That the specific use will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, or significantly diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity; X 2. That the establishment of the specific use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property; X 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary supporting facilities have been or will be provided; X 4. The design, location and arrangement of all driveways and parking spaces provides for the safe and convenient movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic without adversely affecting the general public or adjacent developments; X 5. That adequate nuisance prevention measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust,noise and vibration; X 6. That directional lighting will be provided so as not to disturb or adversely affect neighboring properties; X 7. That there are sufficient landscaping and screening to insure harmony and compatibility with adjacent property; and, X 8. That the proposed use is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. X GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES PROPERTY OWNER: Darlene Hanna LOCATION: 622 W. Lucas EXISTING ZONING: GC-MD-2 (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling-2) District PROPERTY SIZE: 1.057 ac. more or less EXISTING LAND USES: Commercial FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: X — Area determined to be outside the 500 year flood plain. SURROUNDING LAND USES: SURROUNDING ZONING: NORTH: Residential RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District EAST: Commercial RS SOUTH: Commercial GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District WEST: Museum GC-MD-2 (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling-2) District COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Stable Area STREETS: W. Lucas Drive - Secondary arterial with a 60' wide right-of-way and a 40'pavement width. DRAINAGE: Curb and gutter WATER: 2" & 8" water lines SANITARY SEWER SERVICE: 15" sanitary sewer line PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED WITHIN 200' DAHN KATHY P DELACROIX DIEGO EUGENIA LLC HANNA DARLENE HIGH SENDERO PORT ARTHUR INC KOCH CRAIG &TESSA KOCH J D III MAIDA PROPERTIES LTD NEJAD FAMILY LP LTD PARIGI FAMILY LIMITED RAMIREZ MANUEL& DEJUANA REESE SHIRLEY SAFIEH MARY SMLM VENTURES LLC THOMPSON DAN & LAUREE WALKER VIRTIS DARLENE I'Z2021-304: Request for a Revised Specific Use Permit to allow a new driveway in a GC- N 1 D-2 (General Commercial—Multiple-Family—2) District. • pplicant: Brian Dunigan I ocation: 622 W. Lucas Drive 0 100 200 1 1 I I Feet i U W � a . -- 441.011- Legend R S. 304 I:$ 4;k ,/ ff DR EA S AN R-S 4' ` ilk cn G ,--- g / '9t .' R-S \ t G2 1 ii \toe\ Y G2 a���� .x __f !il m GC-MDR, ! I l }- W GC-MD f GC-MD * 1 c GC-MD Z - CALDER AV a r� - ` j E cfl R-S .F cn R-S -� R-S GC—MD GC-MD