HomeMy WebLinkAbout537-BADATE: May 5,2005
TO: Board of Adjustment
FROM: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Request for a special exception to the minimum setback requirement for two signs from
20' to 0' and from 10' to 0' and variances to the maximum sign area requirement from
40 sq. ft. to 47 sq. ft. and from 40 sq. ft. to 48.88 sq. ft.
FILE: 537-BA
STAFF REPORT
R. J. Broussard, DDS, the applicant, is requesting special exceptions to the minimum setback
requirement and variances to the maximum sign area for two owner identification signs that he
would like to install at 1120 Longfellow. The property is zoned NC (Neighborhood
Commercial) District.
Dr. Broussard wishes to construct one sign along the Longfellow frontage and one sign along
the IH-10 frontage, Dr. Broussard states that due to constraints on the property, he feels that
these signs must be located at their proposed locations to be seen by the public.
On the Longfellow side, the applicant states that both directions are blocked by hedges, shrubs
and trees. The building is 22.75' from the property line. On the IH-10 side, the building is 6"
from the property line.
The NC District prohibits the placing of a detached owner identification sign within any
required yard. The required building setback along Longfellow is 20' and 10' along IH-10.
There is no room to place a sign perpendicular to either street and meet the setback
requirement.
The proposed signs also exceed the maximum allowable area requirement. The NC District
restricts a sign to 40 sq. ft. in area. The signs, as designed, are considered monument signs so
the base and sign face are used in the calculation of the total square footage. The sign on
Longfellow would be 47 sq. ft. and the sign on IH-10 would be 48.88 sq. ft.
Exhibits are attached.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Notices mailed to property owners 10 -
Responses in Favor _. Responses in Opposition
Board of adjustments, City of Beaumont Texas:
The purpose for this variance is to request placement of a monument
identification sign less than the required setback.
When I originally contacted the city about this project back on September
29, 2004 that there were no problems with the locations for the proposued on
ed
sign installation. it was also my understanding that the permit was iss
this job and then denied when it went to zoning (This may or may not be
accurate) This sign meets all other requirement with the exception of set
back.
This business's in this complex are different from others in the same area for
a couple of reasons. First and foremost is that we have landscape
obstructions on both sides. On the Longfellow side we are blocked from
both directions by hedges, shrubs, and trees. These are pre-existing
obstructions that we have no control over. We have a little bit more room to
work with on this side than we do on the frontage road side.
On the frontage road side, the entire entrance to the parking lot is bl
ind ind until
you are on top of it. if you have driven by the location you will see that the
building comes right up against the road with no room to spare. We have had
many "near misses" from client hitting the breaks trying to make the turn
into the parking lot. The sign would be a great way to give them plenty of
notice to slow down for the turn. The grass area is the only place on this side
of the building a sign could go the rest is a concrete parking lot.
One of the main hardships we have unlike other businesses is the fact that
MANY of the patients that come to these various offices are in a great dse eal
of pain. These drivers are not nearly as attentive as they would otherwibe.
if you have ever had a bad toothache you will understand. These people
need all the notice they can get in advance to let them know they are
approaching the location.
Also, between the three separate practices the doctors are called into the
office numerous times late at night for emergency cases. This area is very
dark at night so a lighted sign is critical for these cases. Not only are they in
extreme pain but also it's very dark.
As you can see from the pictures we have chosen very subdued colors and
designs for this office. We are Not after a commercial look at all. We would
like a very professional sign that project the quality work done at these
practices. By allowing this variance you would in no way be hindering any
of the other businesses in this area, in fact it would only be improving the
look of the neighborhood and setting a professional example of property
designed signage.
&WOO,
File _537-BA: A request for a special exception to the minimum setback requirement NORTH
for two signs from 20' to 01 and from 101 to 01 and variances to the maximum sign area �&
requirement from 40 sq. ft. to 47 sq. ft. and from 40 sq. ft. to 48.88 sq. ft. SCALE
Location: 1120 Longfellow P=100,
Applicant: R. J. Broussard, DDS
GLADYS AVE.
.EVALON AVE.
0 u no F-Ae I
234
ti
2250
d
'2250
-j
-j
w
LL
0
2.25E
z
0
1
1:34.77
•
f RUl .
Frl; p<f1. :,.. g w; qpr. 14 ZO,?'5 0;:0: ,Fri P-'
' ` --'20"1
Jim
<<
W
i
I
t
I
1
SCALE gf4n=��
PROPOSED HEIGHT
Eu,cK!��ou�1a _,Ch�mptan �.lue
TEXT i iNh110
rcrri Bide . _.
9
DULAS, 49.
y"0112MAL,11 90IsKa DRAW DESIGNIV Off GUSCI iSKO
TO it USED, COPIED, REPRODUCER, OR EX11MITIO IN ANY RAMON
WRNOUT WTOTTEM MOO M1 AND WE A MV( ME AIONT iD 8E
CWERtA1XG pm my WORN DONE FAIDA TO MANUFACINPIMO
rRQM :J041 DM FAX Nfl. :409 892-33e2 17 2005 03: 44PH P7
FMOI N.vw: ----
AI.LiAN06 $199L, NQ,
MIS S. Obunel ROO
vmj;4onmw dky,U 1'6170 -44W C'n E CD G.
j406)701-7500 0 (800) 624,41619 job Na
CTU4L OlYi nihin MYRTPMA Own
040 No-- d
7-T-"
a
it
WID?IJ
■
FHX HO, :9727139599
SCALEV2
I
I PROPOSED fiElGHT__
MCKGROM C h AMPIrl jlPt'-
T I IMT WHITE
Apt-, 14 -20.25 03: FY_'P"I F7
7 -0'
IMMMAL MaM MH
Pp go,%
bAlAs' 78. MTV
?A8 fla-M-WH
rds Ma"ll. UNPIMSHED ORAWING WOO NY (Marl Is 801
To K uim com, mmoucf o, no fXHIlfrfD IN ANY FASHIDN
WTHCUY VUrFEN ONSEAT AND WF MEW THE RIGHT70 Ilf
"MrtWjAjj0 Mh ANY W" mj4t rpnop"M KARUFACTUAIKO
GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTHATIES
APPLICANT: R.J. Broussard, DDS
PROPERTY OWNER: Joint Venture
LOCATION: 1120 Longfellow
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Plat D-16, Tract 233 out of Tract 225, A.
Williams Survey
EXISTING ZONING:
NC (Neighborhood Commercial) District
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.302 acres, more or less
EXISTING LAND USES:
Dentist office
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:
"X" - Areas determined to be outside 500-year
floodplain
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
NORTH: Commercial
NC (Neighborhood Commercial) District
EAST: 1-10
NC
SOUTH: Commercial
NC
WEST: Residential
Its (Residential single Family Dwelling) District
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Activity Corridor/Stable Area
OTHER PHYSICAL
FEATURES:
None
STREETS:
Longfellow Drive -Local street with a 60'wide
right-of-way and a 35' pavementwidth; 111- t 0 -
Freeway - 2 lane access road
DRAINAGE: Curb and gutter
WA 6" water line
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE: 8" and 36" sanitary sewer lines
GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES continued
FIRE PROTECTION: Fire protection is provided by Station #4,
Gladys at W. Lucas.
ADEQUACY
OF SERVICE: Services are adequate,