HomeMy WebLinkAbout338-BASTAFF, REPORT CASE lOr 338-1
DATE: July 20, 1989
• BOARD • ADIUSTMENT
• Planning Divisil
REQUESTED ACTION: Variance to decrease the front and side yard
requirements of Section 30-25 B.1., as provided for under
Section 30-27 E.3. Property is zoned RCR (Residential
Conservation and Revitalization) and located in Block 70, Van
Wormer Addition.
The Planning Division staff recommends that the Board
deny the request for a variance for the following
reasons:
o Granting the variance would be contrary to
the public interest;
o No undue hardship has been demonstrated that
relates to the physical condition of the
building site nor any reasons presented to
show why minimum yard requirements cannot be
complied with; and
o The spirit of the Zoning Ordinance will be
observed by denying the variance.
■
The Don Lightfoot Construction Company has been hired to build a
new 6,600 square foot, one story parish hall for the Cristo Rey
Catholic Church. The proposed building will have a length of 125
feet and a width of approximately 50 feet.
The church owns one-half block (1401 x 3001) which extends from
Avenue "All to Orange. Forsythe forms the northerly boundary. The
church and rectory front upon Avenue "A". The existing 3,734
square foot parish hall lies behind the rectory and extends back
about 96 feet. The proposed parish hall would be connected to the
existing hall at a 90 degree angle and lie adjacent to orange
Street. The new building will be constructed upon Lot #1 and a
portion of Lot #2. The individual lots front Forsythe and the
alley is the rear property line. The new hall would have a rear
yard of 14 feet. This is permitted in the RCR district as an
exception under the regulations of Section 30-25 C.14.
The building as proposed, however, will not be able to meet the
front yard building setback requirement of 25 feet on Forsythe or
the 10-foot exterior side yard on Orange. The contractor's site
plan shows a proposed front yard of about one (1) foot and an
exterior side yard along orange of approximately three (3) feet.
The contractor does not choose to reduce the size of the building
nor move it to another location on the church owned property.
Exhibits are enclosed within this report.
Note: The church property is located in the area that
was a part of the Wall Street/Avenue IICII rezoning
study conducted in the fall of 1987. Several
blocks within the study area were changed from
commrcial and industrial classifications to the
RCR district. Most of this area is developed as a
residential neighborhood.
Don Lightfoot Construction
365 West Railroad
Vidor, Texas 77662
409 - 769 - 5484
July 11, 1989
Planning Division, Room 240
City Hall, 801 Main Street
Beaumont, Texas 77704
Subj: Proposed Cristo Rey Church Hall
767 Avenue A
Beaumont a s
mm
Dear Sirs:
This letter is to respectfully request a
variance change for the subject property proposed to be
located on Lot I thru 6, Block 70, Van Wormer Addition.
In order to construct a building large- enough
to justify the cost and serve the needs of the Church,
we request that the 251 set back on Forsythe Street and
the 101 set back on Orange Street be waived,
It is our opinion that a new building of this
type in this section of Beaumont would be an asset to
all concerned.
Thank you for your favorable consideration
of this request.
Yours very truly,
Don Light t
DL: rm
t 1 1989
,
A UCUSTINIAN FA THERS
767 Ave. A Pilo, 835-7788
Beaumoiit, Texas 77701
Planning Division
P. 0. Box 3827
Room 220
Beaumont, Texas 77704
Dear Sir:
June 30, 1989
This letter is regarding the proposed Cristo Rey hall to
be located on the corner of Orange and Forsythe.
We the parishioners have been long awaiting our new
parish hall. Our hall will be more spacious, attractive and
will be attached to our C.C.D. Center or Religious Education
Center,
We have been advised by our contractor, Don Lightfoot,
that the setback property lines are the reason for the delay
in starting the construction of our hall.
Our hall is for parish activities, which means dinners,
meetings, celebrations, English classes, educational fairs,
etc. Even though the location is in a residential area, it
will be for commercial use. Our new parish hall will enhance
the appearance of the neighborhood and will in no way decrease
the quality of the neighborhood.
We are, therefore, asking you to please reconsider the
setback property lines, so we can begin our really needed new
parish hall.
We thank you for your patience, understanding and
reconsideration in this matter.
Sincerely yours,
President,
Cristo
Rey Parish Council
Pastor, Cristo Rey Church
CASE #7 3 3 8 -BA
APPLICANT: Don Lightfoot PROPERTY OWNER: Cristo Rey Catholic Church
STATUS OF APPLICANT: OWNER PROSPECTIVE BUYER
TENANT X OTHER -- Contractor
Corner of Forsythe and Orange.
LOCATION: Church is 767 Avenue "A".
Lots 1-6, Block 70, Van Wormer Addition.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Erpposed structure will lie on Lot 1 and Part of Lot 2)
EXISTING ZONING: RCR (Residential Conservation and Revitalization)
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: X C (MpM4AL)
* (MODERATE)
* (100 YEAR)
FLOODWAY
SIZE OF PROPERTY: 0.96 ACRES (Entire Church ProPerty)
EXISTING LAND USES: Church, Parish Hall, Parking Lot and Rectory.
(Subject building site is vacant.)
SURROUNDING LAND USES: SURROUNDING ZONING:
NORTH: Residences RCR
EAST: Vacant and Railroad Tracks LI
SOUTH: Residences RCR
WEST: Church Parking Lot and Residences RCR
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Conservation and Revitalization
A M
70N 1 �W, IN I
STREET R.O.W.*Z DESIqMOON/R.O.W.
Forsythe 601 / 201 Residential / 601
Orange 601 / 161 Residential / 601
Avenue "All 601 / 16 Residential / 601
WATER LINES (SIZE AND LOCATION) : Forsythe 611; orange 20"; Avenue "All 611.
SANITARY SEWER (SIZE AND LOCATION): Orange 27"; Avenue "A" 12";
Also a 611 line in the alley.
DRAINAGE: Forsythe open ditch; Orange 2711 storm sewer;
Avenue "All 1811 storm sewer.
FIRE PROTECTION: FIRE STATION NO. 1, 875 College Street.
ADEQUACY OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The services and facilities
as they exist are adequate for the proposed church hall.
NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS: 25
RESPONSES IN FAVOR
R. 0. W.= RIGHT OF WAY
CASE# 338-BA
The Board of Adjustment is empowered to authorize a variance from a require-
ment of the Zoning Ordinance when the Board finds that all of the following
conditions have been met:
CONDITION A: That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
public interest.
CONDITION B: That literal enforcement of the ordinance will result in un-
necessary hardship because of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape,
topography or other extraordinary or exceptional physical situation or
physical condition unique to the specific piece of property in question.
"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property
itself as distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial
considerations or caprice, and the hardship must not result from the appli-
cant or property owner's own actions.
CONDITION C: That by granting the variance, the spirit of the ordinance will
be observed and substantial justice will be done.
ANALYSIS,,
Condition A: The contractor has proposed a new parish hall for the church
containing 6,600 square feet. The existing parish hall has approximately
3,734 square feet. The new building (501 x 1251+) would lie along Orange
Street and extend 14 feet north of the rear property line to within one (1)
foot of the Forsythe Street right-of-way.
Building setbacks or yards are essential to provide an adequate amount of
light, air and privacy for occupants of adjacent structures and residences.
Separation of buildings prevents the spread of fire and facilitates
firefighting capabilities. Yards provide areas for greenery, landscaping,
parking and recreation. Proper building separation through open space and
yards helps in the reduction of noise and aids in the general and public
service access to buildings and structures.
Required open space and yards are in the public"s interest regarding the
health and safety of our citizens. Granting the variance as requested would
be contrary to the public interest.
Condition B: The applicant has not demonstrated that unnecessary hardship
to the property owner would result if the variance is refused. The lots in
Block 70 of the Van Wormer Addition are 501 x 1401 and are similar to other
lots in the immediate neighborhood in shape, topography and lot dimensions.
The applicant has not provided information as to why the proposed hall
cannot be reduced in size or constructed on other available vacant parts of
the church property. No special physical condition unique to this property
has been shown to exist. Compliance with the yard requirements of the
CASE+338-1-
Zoning ordinance may present an inconvenience to the Church or perhaps
increase building construction costs, but a variance in this case is
not warranted. Item relating to financial considerations and
convenience are not grounds for approval.
Condition c: This is an area of conservation and revitalization
according to the land use diagram of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Reinvestmentand revitalization is encouraged in these neighborhoods
and the church has made a comitment to do that. However, building
setbacks and yards provide additional protection to the very residents
of these neighborhoods. Growth should not be accomplished to the
detriment of the nearby neighbors. Setbacks are a major tool in
controlling land use density. They can help protect the quality of
life in an older, established neighborhood. Adequate light, air, privacy and
noise abatement are very important aspects to consider in light of the
existing residential development in the imTediate vicinity of this
proposal. The applicant has not demonstrated any conditions or
justifications that would permit a variance.
FILE 338-BA. Request for a Variance to decrease the front NORTH
and side yard requirements, Don Lightfoot Construction
for Cristo Rey Catholic Church. SCALE
1 /200
i
�6 y0
to
y
j Ulf
�Dvh
y
/ to
- 6 ,
to
r0 ♦ ``ti
p ,rs 0
pIp
y ► h
` aiG
r by ryp
V►4 o t0 r�66
t „
0
�d t1y
to
hq �� r IS 0 vQ �, Vob ri
a° oa tot
t / V� ra / 0 �' V
1,, • «�! r'
p ter '/"° �' / r• r �a
e\ rti o
rb r��,� Nat
tbt v6 C ` p+ t a
�F � -
�) � tbs Z' 6 VVr
43 �h� V
p� �r �•y yp + y �� tr�ha \61
c t '06,,. 4. • Vr� V* 6 `i7 Its 60
tf2 G t �'' trr ,r / to
tba'
G0to
. 'ra trr `rt
p�, trr
�66
f) `tp
r /
�10 0 „blr0 � � ra
f f' S' iy r is ,j 16 / to
54 r0!\