HomeMy WebLinkAbout1731-P
DATE: August 16,
2004
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Consider a request for a specific use permit to allow a residential
care facility in an RCR (Residential Conservation and
Revitalization) District.
FILE: 1731-P
STAFF REPORT
The Planning Manager recommends denial of this request. If this
request is approved, approval should be subject to redesigning the
off-street parking to comply with city codes.
Patty Lee is requesting a specific use permit to allow the continued
operation of a residential care facility at 685 Irma.
In May, 2004, the City Council denied an expansion of the Watts
Home into 1901 Park Street. During the public hearing on that
case, Ms. Lee stated that the Watts Home was occupying a structure
at 685 Irma, next to the original location at 695 Irma. Ms. Lee was
informed that 695 Irma was the only legally permitted site and that
a specific use permit would be required to operate at any other
location. Therefore, Ms. Lee is now requesting that a specific use
permit be granted at 685 Irma.
Ms. Lee states that the purpose of the house at 685 Irma is to offer
the women more privacy, comfort and space in the four bedroom
house. The house has three full bathrooms, a kitchen, a living room
and laundry room. Ms. Lee states that up until 2002, the women of
Watts Home shared their living room with business activities, visiting
social workers, nursing visits and incoming supplies and other traffic
because their living room was located downstairs at 695 Irma.
Ms. Lee says that at 685 Irma, Watts Home is housing 12 women
who cannot live by themselves and are not able to live at home with
family and friends. The staff provides life skills training such as good
hygiene and self help outreach.
In 2002, a fire alarm system was installed, inspected and approved.
Exhibits are attached.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Notices mailed to property owners 24 .
Responses in Favor . Responses in Opposition
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ORDINANCE PURPOSES
Being Lot 5, Block 2, Jersey Farm Addition, City of Beaumont,
Jefferson County, Texas, containing 0.165 acres.
ANALYSIS
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT
(SECTION 30-26.E, ZONING ORDINANCE)
Application
Application
is in is not in
Comments
Compliance
Compliance Attached
CONDITIONS:
1. That the specific use will be
compatible with and not injurious
to the use and enjoyment of other
property, nor significantly diminish
or impair property values within
the immediate vicinity;
X X
2. That the establishment of the
specific use will not impede the
normal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding vacant
property;
X
3. That adequate utilities, access
roads, drainage and other necessary
supporting facilities have been or
will be provided; X
4. The design, location and arrangement
of all driveways and parking spaces
provides for the safe and convenient
movement of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic without adversely affecting
the general public or adjacent
developments;
X X
5. That adequate nuisance prevention
measures have been or will be taken
to prevent or control offensive odor,
fumes, dust, noise and vibration; X
6. That directional lighting will be
provided so as not to disturb or
adversely affect neighboring properties; X
7. That there are sufficient landscaping
and screening to insure harmony and
compatibility with adjacent property; and X
8. That the proposed use is in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan.
X X
ANALYSIS continued
This application is in conformance with four of the eight conditions
necessary for approval. Comments on Conditions 1, 4 and 8 follow:
1. A specific use permit was originally granted for 695 Irma
with the thought of preserving and rehabilitating an old
property with a A compatible @ use. However, since the
granting of that original specific use permit, questions
have arisen as to the compatibility of this particular
residential care facility with the surrounding
neighborhood. Any previous expansion of this facility
has met opposition from persons in the neighborhood.
While there is a need for such housing, the Planning
Commission and City Council must weigh the effect of an
expansion on the surrounding community.
4. The Traffic Manager has denied the proposed parking layout.
He states that the layout does not meet city code. The
Planning Manager states that if the specific use permit
is approved, it should be subject to the parking area
meeting city code.
8. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as
Conservation and Revitalization. In such areas,
incompatible land uses are a big problem. To allow the
expansion of an incompatible use is questionable because
of the alleged negative influences it has on the
surrounding neighborhood.
GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES
APPLICANT: Patty Lee
PROPERTY OWNER: Same
LOCATION: 685 Irma
EXISTING ZONING: RCR (Residential
Conservation and
Revitalization)
PROPERTY SIZE: 0.165 acres, more or less
EXISTING LAND USES: Residential care facility
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: A X @ - Areas determined to be
outside 500-year floodplain
SURROUNDING LAND USES: SURROUNDING ZONING:
NORTH: Church RCR (Residential Conservation
Revitalization) District
EAST: Residential RCR
SOUTH: Residential RCR
WEST: Residential Care Facility RCR
GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES continued
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Conservation and
Revitalization
OTHER PHYSICAL
FEATURES: None
STREETS: Irma Street - local street with a
60' wide right-of-way and a 27'
pavement width.
DRAINAGE: Curb and gutter
WATER: 8" water line
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE: 6" sanitary sewer line
FIRE PROTECTION: Fire protection is provided by
Station #11, 2185 Sabine Pass.
ADEQUACY
OF SERVICE: Services are adequate.