Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1924-P DATE:December 15, 2008 TO: Planning Commission and City Council FROM: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Consider a request for a revocation of a specific use permit to allow a beauty shop in an RCR (Residential Conservation and Revitalization) District FILE: 1924-P STAFF REPORT The Planning Manager recommends approval. On February 13, 2008, City Council approved a specific use permit to allow a beauty shop in an RCR (Residential Conservation and Revitalization) District. The property is located at 2190 Broadway. Carleatha Wells received a specific use permit to allow her to operate a four seat beauty shop on the first floor of the two story structure on her property. Ms. Wells lives on the second floor of the building. The specific use permit was approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Remove the gravel parking area along the west side of the property. 2. Install a 6' wide landscape strip along the west side of all parking areas. 3. Provide a minimum of 10 on-premise parking spaces. The parking layout shall be approved by the Traffic Manager. In a letter dated July 3, 2008, the City of Beaumont=s Code Enforcement Officer for the Oaks Historic District notified Ms. Wells that the three conditions had not been met and was given until July 25, 2008 to comply. As of the date of this staff report, the conditions have not been met. Exhibits are attached. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Notices mailed to property owners 22 . Responses in Favor . Responses in Opposition . LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ORDINANCE PURPOSES Being the west 2 of Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 15, McFaddin Addition, City of Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, containing 0.24 acres, more or less. ANALYSIS CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (SECTION 30-26.E, ZONING ORDINANCE) Application Application is in is not in Comments Compliance Compliance Attached CONDITIONS: 1. That the specific use will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, nor significantly diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity; X X 2. That the establishment of the specific use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property; X 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary supporting facilities have been or will be provided; X 4. The design, location and arrangement of all driveways and parking spaces provides for the safe and convenient movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic without adversely affecting the general public or adjacent developments; X X 5. That adequate nuisance prevention measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration; X 6. That directional lighting will be provided so as not to disturb or adversely affect neighboring properties; X 7. That there are sufficient landscaping and screening to insure harmony and compatibility with adjacent property; and X X 8. That the proposed use is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. X ANALYSIS continued This application is in conformance with six of the eight conditions necessary for approval. Comments on Conditions 1, 4 and 7 follow: 1. In 2000, City Council approved a specific use permit for a two chair beauty shop. The proposed four chair beauty shop will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. Commercial uses exist to the north and east of the subject property. 4. An existing driveway along the west side of the property has been covered up to the street with gravel. Ms. Wells states that she was given this gravel and placing it where she did was cheaper than repairing the sidewalk. This property is located in the Oaks Historic District. Therefore, a certificate of appropriateness would be required to install any parking. No certificate of appropriateness was granted. The historic district regulations prohibit gravel parking lots. All parking must be paved with concrete, masonry pavers or asphalt and must be, at a minimum, located at the building setback. In addition, a minimum of ten on-premise parking spaces had to be provided and approved by the Traffic Manager. As of the date of this staff report, the gravel has not been removed nor have the ten on-premise parking spaces been constructed. 7. The street frontages of all required parking areas must be screened with a six foot wide landscape strip. As of the date of this staff report, the landscape strip has not been installed. GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES APPLICANT: Carleatha Wells PROPERTY OWNER: Same LOCATION: 2190 Broadway EXISTING ZONING: RCR (Residential Conservation and Revitalization) District PROPERTY SIZE: 0.24 acres, more or less EXISTING LAND USES: Residence FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: A X @ - Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain SURROUNDING LAND USES: SURROUNDING ZONING: NORTH: Commercial GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District EAST: Commercial RCR (Residential Conservation and Revitalization) District GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES continued SOUTH: Residential RCR WEST: Residential, commercial RCR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Conservation and Revitalization STREETS: Broadway Avenue - Local street with a 60' wide right-of-way and a 27' pavement width; Sixth Street - Local street with a 60' wide right-of-way and a 20' pavement width DRAINAGE: Curb and gutter WATER: 6" water lines SANITARY SEWER SERVICE: 12" - 24" sanitary sewer lines PROPERTY OWNERS ARDMORE ADDITION % R T FERTITTA ATWOOD DEBORAH BALDERAS PEDRO (CD) AZIZ NADEEM (LH) BOUDREAU ELSA M BURNS ANTIK HAUS LLC CASTELAN JORGE CREEKMORE FRIEDA FRACHT STUART HOLMES SHANNON A KELLY CHARLES E KELLY CHARLES EDWARD LESLIE PRESTON & VERONICA MARTIN MARK E NICHOLAS LAUREL M ROONEY MICHAEL & SHAWN ROY LEVORIS & HELEN SCHULDT GEORGE ET UX STANLEY CLAUD G WEINGARTEN REALTY INC #03 % EQUITAX PROP CONSULTANTS INC WELLS CAREATHA E WENDT ESTELLA M WILLIAMS LOUIS M JR