HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-ZP
DATE: December 21,
2009
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Consider a request for a zone change from RS (Residential Single
Family Dwelling) District to GC-MD-2 (General
Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling-2) District or more
restrictive district and a specific use permit to allow a storage
facility in a GC-MD-2 (General Commercial-Multiple Family
Dwelling-2) District
FILE: 2014-Z/P
STAFF REPORT
The Planning Manager recommends denial.
Troy Booker has applied for a zone change from RS (Residential Single
Family Dwelling) District to GC-MD-2 (General Commercial-Multiple
Family Dwelling-2) District and a specific use permit to allow a
storage facility in a GC-MD-2 District. The property is located at
3699 Kenneth.
Mr. Booker states that he has owned the property for the last fifteen
years. The building, itself, appears to have been there for many
years. He states that the building is used as storage for his personal
and business use. He would store such items as lawn mowers, a
trailer, garage doors, tools and a work truck. According to the site
plan, the north end of the building is to be removed by Mr. Booker.
In February, 2009, the City of Beaumont tagged this building as a
dangerous structure. Pam Loiacano, City of Building Demolition
Coordinator, determined that the building is not suitable for
rehabilitation. The building has not yet gone to City Council for
demolition. In addition, a judgement has been filed against the
property by Jefferson County for back taxes in the amount of
$10,820.19.
This rezoning could be considered spot zoning. Spot zoning connotes
an unacceptable zone change that singles out a single tract for
treatment that differs from that accorded similar surrounding land
without proof of changes and conditions. The following issues should
be considered when determining whether a spot zoning situation
exists:
The law demands that the approved zoning plan should be
respected and not altered for the special benefit of the
landowner when the change will cause substantial detriment
to the surrounding land or serve no substantial public purpose.
Would the zone change be in compliance with the adopted
comprehensive plan?
RESPONSE: All of the surrounding property is zoned RS. The
South Park
STAFF REPORT continued
Neighborhood Plan designates the subject property and the
surrounding area as single family residential. The proposed
zone change would be for the special benefit of the
landowner. The zone change would not be in compliance with
the South Park
Neighborhood Plan.
Will this change adversely impact the surrounding properties?
Lots that are rezoned in a way that is substantially inconsistent
with the zoning of the surrounding area, whether more or less
restrictive, are likely to be invalid.
RESPONSE: Rezoning the subject property to GC-MD-2 would
allow for a large number of commercial uses with a specific use
permit. Rezoning the subject property would be inconsistent
with the zoning of the surrounding area.
Is the tract of land suitable or unsuitable for use as presently
zoned? The size, shape and location of a tract of land or lot
may render it unusable or even confiscatory as zoned.
RESPONSE: If the building is demolished, the property itself is
suitable for single family residential. The commercial building
that is located on the property is a non-conforming structure
and any commercial use would be non-conforming. As is
typical of a non-conforming structure and/or use, once it no
longer exists, the non-conformity disappears and the property
reverts to a conforming use.
The building has been tagged by the City as a dangerous
structure and has been determined to be unsuitable for
rehabilitation. In addition, demolishing the dilapidated structure
would enhance what is otherwise a single family residential
neighborhood.
Does the proposed zone change bear a substantial relationship to
the public health, safety, morals or general welfare or protect
and preserve historical and cultural places and areas?
RESPONSE: The proposed zone change does not bear a
substantial relationship to the public health, morals or general
welfare. A zone change that would allow a commercial use
could be detrimental to the general welfare of the single family
residential neighborhood.
Exhibits are attached.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Notices mailed to property owners 29 .
Responses in Favor . Responses in Opposition
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ORDINANCE PURPOSES
Being Lot 12 and the West 2 of Lot 11, Block 16, Jeff Chaison
Addition, City of Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, containing
0.209 acres, more or less.
ANALYSIS
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT
(SECTION 30-26.E, ZONING ORDINANCE)
Application
Application
is in is not in
Comments
Compliance
Compliance Attached
CONDITIONS:
1. That the specific use will be
compatible with and not injurious
to the use and enjoyment of other
property, nor significantly diminish
or impair property values within
the immediate vicinity;
X X
2. That the establishment of the
specific use will not impede the
normal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding vacant
property;
X
3. That adequate utilities, access
roads, drainage and other necessary
supporting facilities have been or
will be provided; X
4. The design, location and arrangement
of all driveways and parking spaces
provides for the safe and convenient
movement of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic without adversely affecting
the general public or adjacent
developments;
X X
5. That adequate nuisance prevention
measures have been or will be taken
to prevent or control offensive odor,
fumes, dust, noise and vibration; X
6. That directional lighting will be
provided so as not to disturb or
adversely affect neighboring properties; X
7. That there are sufficient landscaping
and screening to insure harmony and
compatibility with adjacent property; and
X X
8. That the proposed use is in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan.
X X
ANALYSIS continued
This application is in conformance with three of the eight conditions
necessary for approval. Comments on Conditions 1, 4, 7 and 8
follow:
5. The commercial building that is located on the subject
property is non-conforming. The redevelopment of this
property as a commercial use would be incompatible with
surrounding land uses and zoning. The Planning Manager
considers the request spot zoning.
4. The proposed parking spaces along the south side of the
building would back directly onto Pipkin St. This parking
layout is not allowed.
7. The applicant proposes building a 10' tall privacy fence
along the east property line. Due to the layout of the
proposed parking, the required 6' wide landscape strip
would be impossible to install.
8. The South Park Neighborhood Plan designates this area for
single family residential. The proposed use is not in
conformance with the Neighborhood Plan.
GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES
APPLICANT: Troy Booker
PROPERTY OWNER: Same
LOCATION: 3966 Kenneth
EXISTING ZONING: RS (Residential Single
Family Dwelling) District
PROPERTY SIZE: 0.209 acres, more or less
EXISTING LAND USES: Vacant commercial building
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: A X @ - Areas determined to be
outside 500-year floodplain
SURROUNDING LAND USES: SURROUNDING ZONING:
NORTH: Residential RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District
EAST: Residential RS
SOUTH: Residential RS
WEST: Vacant RS
GENERAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC UTILITIES continued
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Single Family Residential
STREETS: Kenneth Street - Local street with
a 60' wide right-of-way and a 20'
pavement width; Pipkin Street -
Local street with a 60' wide
right-of-way and an 18'
pavement width
DRAINAGE: Kenneth - Curb and gutter
Pipkin - Open ditch
WATER: 2" and 12" water lines
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE: 15" sanitary sewer line
PROPERTY OWNERS
ADAMS CARL
ANTOINE RENITA MICHELLE
BATISTE CAROL LYNN
BLAIZE LAWRENCE
BOOKER TROY LEE SR
CELESTINE SHARON ANN
CNA RENTAL MANAGEMENT LLC
CREEL DARREN
DEEN ENAMUDEEN UNUS & SHAHIR
DELARA ESONIA
HANSEN RON WILLIAM
HARBIN GREGORY E
JAMES ALLEN JR
JONES SQUIRE J SR
JOSEPH ALBERT JR & EMILY
JOUBERT WILLIE ROY SR & JESSIE
KING TREVENCE & MARGARET
LEDESMA DANIEL
LORENZ BOBBIE
MARTINEZ RAUL & TERESA
NGUYEN PETER & NAM XUAN
NIETO CARLOS & ADELAIDA BOHENA
OZCO FERNANDO & AMADA MONTALVO
REAL LEE LP
PROPERTY OWNERS continued
REYNA DAVID & RAQUEL
RICHARD JOYCE
SPAULDING TONI
TORRES LEONARD
WILLIAMS MIKE