HomeMy WebLinkAbout1-25-16 PC Minutes*MINUTES*
REGULAR MEETING
JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Chambers
January 25, 2016
A Regular Meeting and Joint Public Hearings of the Planning Commission and City Council was
held on January 25, 2016 and called to order at 3:19 p.m. with the following members present:
Commission Members present:
Commission Members absent:
Councilmembers present
Councilmembers absent:
Chairman Sina Nejad
Vice -Chairman Marty Craig
Commissioner Lynda Kay Makin
Commissioner Ava Graves
Commissioner Lauren Williams -Mason
Commissioner Eddie Senigaur
Commissioner J.P. Colbert
Commissioner Clint Walters
Commissioner Frank Messina
Commissioner Bill Little
Mayor Becky Ames
Councilman W.L. Pate
Councilman Claude F. Guidroz
Councilwoman Gethrel Williams -Wright
Councilman Mike Getz
Councilwoman Robin Mouton
Councilman Audwin Samuel
None
Also present: Chris Boone, Director of Planning and Community
Development; Adina Ward, Planner II; Raymond Rowzee,
Planner I, Fran Malvo, Recording Secretary; Tyrone
Cooper, City Attorney
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chairman Nejad addressed the Board regarding the minutes. Commissioner Makin made a
motion to approve the minutes from September 21, 2015, October 19, 2015 and November 16,
2015. Commissioner Mason seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7:0.
REGULAR MEETING
1) Replat of Lot 10 and West'/2 of Lot 11, Block 6, Oak Cliff Second Addition, into Lots 10
A and 11 A BIock 6 Oak Cliff Second Addition: Consider a request for a Replat of Lot
10 and West '/z of Lot 11, Block 6, Oak Cliff Second Addition, into Lots 10 A and 11 A,
Block 6, Oak Cliff Second Addition Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas
Applicant: Faust Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
Location: 6540, 6550, 6560 and 6570 Pointe' Park Drive
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. Richard Faust, representing Faust Engineering and
Surveying, Inc., has requested a Replat of Lot 10 and West 1/2 of Lot 11, Block 6, Oak
Cliff Second Addition into Lots 10A and 11 A, Block 6, Oak Cliff Second Addition,
Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas.
The purpose of the plat is to relocate a lot line and create 2 (two) 45 (forty-five) ft. wide
lots.
The lots do not meet the minimum lot width requirement for residential property.
The applicant also requests a variance to the minimum lot width requirements.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
Twenty-seven (27) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property. No responses were received in favor and seven were received in opposition.
The Planning staff recommended denial.
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
Richard Faust representing Faust Engineering & Surveying, Inc. at 2525 Calder
addressed the Commissioners.
Chairman Nejad asked for any public comments in favor of or against the case. Elizabeth
Pittman, 3850 Empire Road addressed the Commissioners and spoke against the case.
Adrian Stewart, 2170 23`d addressed the Commissioners and expressed concerns about
the integrity of the neighborhood. Clayton Livingston, 3780 Buckingham Row addressed
the Commissioners and spoke against the case. Kelli Manness, 25 Bellechase Garden Dr.
addressed the Commissioners and spoke against the case. Jennifer Tate 3850 Austin St.
addressed the Commissioners and spoke against the case. Benny Mendoza, 5655 S.
Kenneth addressed the Commissioners and spoke against the case. The public hearing
was closed. Vice Chairman Craig made a motion to deny a request for a Replat of Lot 10
and West'/2 Lot 11, Block 6, Oak Cliff Second Addition into Lots 10A and I IA, Block 6,
Oak Cliff Second Addition as requested. Commissioner Makin seconded the motion.
Motion to deny carried 7:0.
2) Replat of Lot 15 and 16, Washington Manor Unit 6 into Lot 15A: Consider a request for
approval of the Replat of Lot 15 and 16, Washington Manor, Unit 6, Beaumont, Jefferson
County, Texas.
Applicant: Faust Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
Location: 4430 Roberts Avenue
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. Richard Faust, representing Faust Engineering and
Surveying, Inc., has requested a Replat of Lot 15 & Lot 16 out of Washington Manor,
Unit 6 into Lot 15A, Washington Manor Unit 6. The property is located at 4430 Roberts
Avenue.
The purpose of the plat is to remove a lot line to allow for future additions.
The lot exceeds the minimum lot area, width and depth requirements for residential
property.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
Fourteen (14) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property. No responses were received in favor or in opposition.
The Planning staff recommended approval of the request.
The applicant was present. Richard Faust representing Faust Engineers & Surveyors, Inc.
at 2525 Calder addressed the Commissioners. Chairman Nejad asked if there were any
questions for Mr. Boone. Chairman Nejad asked if anyone had questions, comments,
discussions or a motion. The public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Craig made a
motion to approve a Replat of Lot 15 and 16, Washington Manor, Unit 6, Beaumont,
Jefferson County, Texas as requested. Commissioner Mason seconded the motion.
Motion to approve carried 7:0.
3) Partial Replat of Block 1, T.H. Langham Subdivision into Lot 1 A, Block 1, T.H.
Langham Subdivision: Consider a request for a Partial Replat of Block 1, T.H.
Langham Subdvision into Lot 1A, T.H. Langham Subdivision, Beaumont, Jefferson
County, Texas
Applicant: AGC Consultants, LLC
Location: North side of the intersection of Interstate 10 and Walden Road, in the
Holiday Inn Tract, at 3950 Interstate 10 South
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. AGC Consultants, LLC, has requested approval for
a 0.6841 acre, Partial Replat of Block 1, T. H. Langham Subdivision into Lot 1A, Block
1, T. H. Langham Subdivision. The property is located on the north side of the
intersection of Interstate 10 and Walden Road, in the Holiday Inn Tract, at 3950 Interstate
10 South.
The recorded easement described in documents 8407359 and 86228294 is an access
easement for the service station on the east side of the proposed plat. The easement states
that this area cannot be blocked by the new development and should not be abandoned by
the plat.
The propose of the plat is to create a subdivided tract.
The lot exceeds the minimum lot area, width and depth requirements for commercial
property.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
The Planning staff recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Show and label all easements across proposed Lot lA along with those described in
Jefferson County Clerk document numbers 8407359 and 8628294,
2. Any extended or current sanitary sewer line crossing the proposed Lot IA, is required
to have a 10 (ten) ft. wide exclusive sanitary sewer easement.
Three (3) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property.
No notices were received in favor and one was received in opposition.
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
Laurie Riojas, representative for AGS Consultants, 16800 Park Dr. Suite 180 A, Houston,
Texas addressed the Commissioners and stated that they were willing to comply with all
requirements in order to get the plats processed and recorded.
Chairman Nejad asked for any public comments in favor of or against the case. Craig
Hill, President and C.F.O. of Steinghagen Oil Co., Inc., 1225 Sheridan Lane addressed
the Commissioners. Mr. Hill spoke against the case. LaRay Tucker, 1211 S. White
Chapel Boulevard, South Lake, Texas addressed the Commissioners. Ms. Tucker stated
she was the purchaser and owner of the property for the Taco Bell and that she was aware
of all the easements. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Nejad addressed Mr.
Cooper regarding a plat that did not show the easements and if the applicant is intending
to revise the plat will there be any issues. Mr. Cooper stated that before the easements are
assigned all of the requirements and conditions must be placed on the plat.
Commissioner Makin questioned if the Commissioners could vote on the case as is. Mr.
Cooper stated they are to vote on the plat that is presented before them. Mr. Hill
interjected. Discussion followed. Commissioner Makin made a motion to approve a
request for a Partial Replat of Block 1, T.H. Langham Subdvision into Lot 1A, T.H.
Langham Subdivision, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas with the following conditions:
1. Show and label all easements across proposed Lot IA along with those described in
Jefferson County Clerk document numbers 8407359 and 8628294.
2, Any extended or current sanitary sewer line crossing the proposed Lot IA, is required
to have a 10 (ten) ft. wide exclusive sanitary sewer easement.
Commissioner Senigaur seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 5:1:1
(Commissioner Mason opposed and Commissioner Graves abstained).
4) Pine Glenn, Fifth Addition, Phase 2, Section 1: Consider a request for a preliminary
plat approval of Pine Glenn, Fifth Addition, Phase 2, Section 1, Beaumont, Jefferson
County, Texas
Applicant: Faust Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
Location: Tolivar Road
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. Faust Engineering and Surveying, Inc. have
requested preliminary plat approval of Pine Glenn, Fifth Addition, Phase 2, Section 1,
The property is located west of the intersection of Tolivar Road and Nicole Lane. The
development is a 3.60 acre, single family residential subdivision, and the proposed layout
shows 18 single family lots. All lots will access Tolivar Road via the proposed Essie
Lane. Sanitary sewer and water will be provided by extension of the City of Beaumont
utilities.
This item was sent to all interested parties.
The Planning staff recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide recorded easements for the proposed temporary cul-de-sac and drainage
ditch.
2. Modify Note 7 to read, "Lots shall not drain on adjacent properties before and
after structures are built."
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
The public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Craig made a motion to approve a request
for a preliminary plat approval of Pine Glenn, Fifth Addition, Phase 2, Section 1,
Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas with the following conditions:
1. Show and label all easements across proposed Lot lA along with those described
in Jefferson County Clerk document numbers 8407359 and 8628294.
2. Any extended or current sanitary sewer line crossing the proposed Lot 1A, is required
to have a 10 (ten) ft. wide exclusive sanitary sewer easement.
Commissioners then asked to hear from the applicant. Richard Faust, 2525 Calder
addressed the Commissioners. Commissioner Makin seconded the motion. Motion to
approve carried 7:0.
5) Minor Plat of Eastham Subdivision: Consider a request for Minor plat approval Eastham
Subdivision, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas
Applicant: Andrew Allemand
Location; Northeast of North I lth Street and Spindletop Square Drive
Andrew Allemand, representing Windrose Land Services, Inc. has requested approval of
the single lot, 16.4142 acre, Minor Plat of Eastham Subdivision. The property is located
on the west side of North I 11h Street and north of Spindletop Square Drive. Water and
Sanitary Sewer are both available along North 11`' Street.
This item was sent to all interested parties.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
The Planning staff recommended approval subject to:
1. Rezone property in order to avoid a "Split -Zoned" lot.
Mr. Boone stated that there were issues regarding the zoning and prior to recording the
final plat it will need to be resolved.
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
Commissioner Mason made a motion to approve a request for Minor plat approval
Eastham Subdivision, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas as requested with the
following condition:
1. Rezone property in order to avoid a "Split -Zoned" lot.
Vice -Chairman Craig seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7:0.
JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS
1) File 2242-P: Consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for a retail T-shirt and
merchandise print shop in an RCR (Residential Conservation Revitalization) District.
Applicant; Toni J. Prados
Location: 4570 Highland Avenue
On October 19, 2015, the Planning Commission chose to table this item until a proper
site plan was submitted.
Toni J. Prados, owner of Area Impressions, is asking to open a retail T-shirt business at
4705 Highland Avenue. The property is zoned RCR (Residential Conservation
Revitalization). Ms. Prados has operated a beauty salon at this location for at least two
years, and currently owns a T-shirt shop at another location. The beauty shop at this
location is currently being expanded for storage. She would like to convert this storage
space, and move the retail T-shirt shop into the expanded space.
The shop will not involve screen -printing, but rather new technology which allows
designs to be printed directly to clothing items and accessories, much as a picture may be
printed from an office printer. Designs would be created and printed in the shop.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
Staff recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Parking and driveways must meet city standards.
2. Parallel space at front of building must be next to the building, allowing traffic to
flow around it and curb cut on Highland must remain to allow exit of traffic.
3. Paving must extend past the handicapped access isle and handicapped space must
have proper signage.
4. An 8 foot privacy fence and 10 foot landscape buffer must be installed and
maintained along the east and south property lines.
5. A 6 foot wide landscape strip must be installed and maintained along the entire
length of parking areas at Highland Avenue.
6. An automatic irrigation system must be installed, sufficient to provide complete
coverage of all required landscaping.
Twelve (12) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property. No responses were received in favor of or in opposition.
Toni I Prados, 1090 Avenue H addressed the Commissioners regarding flooding and
draining issues. Ms. Prados also expressed concerns regarding omitting condition number
5 which addresses the landscaping. Discussion followed. Councilwoman Wright
addressed the Commissioners regarding the flooding on Alabama. Chairman Nejad
opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments. Chairman Nejad
questioned Mr. Boone if Traffic had reviewed the case and Mr. Boone stated that Traffic
approved the case with the conditions. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner
Mason made a motion to approve a request for a Specific Use Permit for a retail T-shirt
and merchandise print shop in an RCR (Residential Conservation Revitalization) District
as requested in File 2242-P with the following conditions:
1. Parking and driveways must meet city standards.
2. Parallel space at front of building must be next to the building, allowing traffic to
flow around it and curb cut on Highland must remain to allow exit of traffic.
3. Paving must extend past the handicapped access isle and handicapped space must
have proper signage.
4. An 8 foot privacy fence and 10 foot landscape buffer must be installed and
maintained along the east and south property lines.
5. A 6 foot wide landscape strip must be installed and maintained along the entire
length of parking areas at Highland Avenue.
6. An automatic irrigation system must be installed, sufficient to provide complete
coverage of all required landscaping.
Condition number 5 was omitted per the Commissioners. Commissioner Senigaur
seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7:0.
2) File 2249-P: Consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow an assisted living
facility in RM-H (Residential Multiple Family Dwelling -Highest Density).
Location: 2990 S. Major Drive
Applicant: Vera Bagneris
Mr. Boone presented the staff report.
Vera Bagneris contacted staff regarding a privately funded assisted living facility at 2990
S. Major Drive, in September of 2015. During the conversation, Ms. Bagneris mentioned
she wanted to keep twelve (12) individuals. A predevelopment meeting was scheduled to
help her understand all that would be required to keep twelve (12) individuals. During the
predevelopment meeting, Ms. Bagneris mentioned that she already keeps two (2)
individuals at the property. In order to keep these two (2) individuals, she applied for a
CO (Certificate of Occupancy). Several inspections for the CO failed. Ms. Bagneris is
now formally requesting permission to keep twelve (12) individuals. The conditions
listed reflect the findings during inspections made for the CO. Ms. Bagneris proposes to
provide 24 hour care for twelve (12) elderly residents. Caretakers would be present 24
hours per day, but not living at the property. Some of the clients residing in this facility
will require nursing and ambulatory care. Some residents may have limited mobility.
The applicant is asking for a waiver to any additional landscaping. A four (4) foot chain
link fence is located along the north and west property lines, with no existing landscaped
buffers. There is no fence along the south property line.
Slides of the subject property were shown.
Nine (9) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property.
One response was received in favor and one response was received in opposition.
Staff recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Pending approval of food preparation and storage areas by health inspectors.
2. Any improvements made within the state right-of-way shall be permitted by
TXDOT.
3. A six (6) foot wide landscaped strip, as prescribed by ordinance, must be located
between the front parking spaces and the right -of way.
4. The ADA space shall be signed according to ADA requirements.
5. An eight (8) foot wood or masonry privacy screening fence must be constructed
and maintained along the south property line.
6. Building must be brought up to all current applicable fire & building codes, per
international fire & building codes - 2009 edition, Including, but not limited to,
fire extinguishers, sprinkler system, fire alarm, exit lights, emergency lights, knox
box, fixed hood system, and additional hydrant(s) as needed. All electrical
systems must meet commercial codes.
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
Vera Bagneris, 2990 S. Major Drive addressed the Commissioners. Ms. Bagneris stated
that was currently working with the Fire Marshall to have sprinkler systems and fire
alarms installed in her facility. Mayor Ames questioned Ms. Bagneris about a nearby
assisted living facility, Summer Place.
Chairman Nejad asked if there was any one that would like to speak for or against the
case. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Senigaur made a motion to approve a
request for a Specific Use Permit to allow an assisted living facility in RM-H (Residential
Multiple Family Dwelling -Highest Density) as requested in File 2249-P with the
following conditions:
1. Pending approval of food preparation and storage areas by health inspectors.
2. Any improvements made within the state right-of-way shall be permitted by
TXDOT.
3. A six (6) foot wide landscaped strip, as prescribed by ordinance, must be located
between the front parking spaces and the right -of way.
4. The ADA space shall be signed according to ADA requirements.
5. An eight (8) foot wood or masonry privacy screening fence must be constructed
and maintained along the south property line.
6. Building must be brought up to all current applicable fire & building codes, per
international fire & building codes - 2009 edition, Including, but not limited to,
fire extinguishers, sprinkler system, fire alarm, exit lights, emergency lights, knox
box, fixed hood system, and additional hydrant(s) as needed. All electrical
systems must meet commercial codes.
Vice Chairman Craig seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6:1 (Commissioner
Mason).
3) File 2250-Z: Consider a request for a rezoning from RS (Residential Single Family
Dwelling to GC -MD (General Commercial -Multiple Family Dwelling) or a more
restrictive district.
Applicant: City of Beaumont Planning Division
Location: 800-1000 Blocks of the North Side of West Cardinal Drive
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. In August 2015, Patrick Gibbs applied for a zone
change from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District to GC -MD (General
Commercial Multiple Family Dwelling) District. Ivlr. Gibbs stated that it was not
financially feasible to develop his property as residential lots. He also stated that the
properties location was not suited for single family residential lots as the access would be
from West Cardinal Drive.
At the August meeting, Staff recommended denial based upon that fact that the zone
change constituted spot zoning. After discussion with the Planning Commission, staff
suggested that a zoning study of the area be done.
A zoning study was done for the area surrounded by Bingman Drive to the northwest,
South Kenneth Avenue to the northeast and West Cardinal Drive to the south. Based
upon that study, staff recommends that Mr. Gibbs property, and all or the lots to the
southeast of his property, be rezoned to RM-H (Residential Multiple Family Dwelling -
Highest Density).
The rezoning of these properties to RM-H.would not have an adverse effect on the
church, and would allow for multi -family developments along with a few commercial
uses. Commercial uses would be limited, and would require a Specific Use Permit,
triggering notification of property owners within 200 feet.
Slides were shown of the subject property.
Fifty-five (55) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property. No responses were received in favor and one response was received in
opposition.
Planning staff recommended approval of this request.
Chairman Nejad asked if there was any one that would like to speak for or against the
case. Mayor Ames questioned for clarification of the zoning which stated RS to GC -MD
or a more restrictive district, which should be RM-H. Mr. Boone stated that it had to be
done that way in order to consider different zone types.
Patrick Gibbs, 4835 Corley addressed the Commissioners. Commissioner Makin asked
Mr. Gibbs if he was in agreement with the Commissioners approving his case as RM-H.
Mr. Gibbs said that he agreed but he would prefer GC -MD. Commissioner Mason
addressed Mr. Boone. Discussion followed.
John Tallarita, 5610 Winfrey addressed the Commissioners and expressed concerns about
the area being targeted to Section 8 housing or assisted living and spoke against the case.
Mr. Boone stated that there are no current plans for Section 8 housing or assisted living.
Joseph Serio, 135 Richmond addressed the Commissioners. Mr. Serio stated that he owns
property at 5580 S. Kenneth and he stated that it would negatively impact all
homeowners from Highland Avenue to Avenue A. He spoke against the case. The public
hearing was closed. Commissioner Senigaur made a motion to approve a request for a
rezoning from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) to RM-H (Residential Multiple
Family Dwelling -Highest Density) as requested in File 2250-Z. Commissioner Mason
seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7:0. Commissioner Mason questioned
what the motion was for. Mr. Boone stated that it was for RM-H.
4) File 2251-P: Consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for a cellular tower an LI
(Light Industrial) District.
Applicant: David Petrakovitz representing Ecosite
Location: 1490 7"' Street
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. David Petrakovitz of Pyramid Network Services,
LLC representing Ecosite proposes to construct a cellular tower on 3150 sq. ft. of leased
property, in the rear yard of the Salvation Army facility located at 1490 7th Street. No
City Utilities will be required at the unmanned site. Access to the site will be via an
access easement from Louisiana Street.
The tower would be 150 feet in height and over 275 feet fiom the nearest residentially
zoned district.
Three (3) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property.
No responses were received in favor or in opposition.
Slides were shown of the subject property.
Staff recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide a copy of the recorded access easement and lease agreement.
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
David Petrakovitz, 3603 Sunlight Hill Lane, Spring, Texas addressed the Commissioners.
Discussion followed. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Makin made a
motion to approve a request for a Specific Use Permit for a cellular tower an LI (Light
Industrial) District as requested in File 2251-P with the following condition:
1. Provide a copy of the recorded access easement and lease agreement.
Commissioner Mason seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7:0.
5) File 2252-Z: Consider a request to rezone from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling
to GC -MD (General Commercial -Multiple Family Dwelling) or a more restrictive
district.
Applicant: Hani Tohme of Golden Triangle Consulting Engineers
Location: The south side of Washington Boulevard approximately 200' east of
Blossom Drive.
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. Hani Tohme of Golden Triangle Consulting
Engineers plans to submit a plat to divide the property across from 4050 & 4060
Washington Boulevard into seven (7) residential lots fronted by a commercial tract. The
portion to be rezoned to GC -MD (General Commercial Multiple Family Dwelling) is
approximately 142 feet deep and 307 feet wide. This would leave room for a 50 foot
wide residential street to be developed between the proposed conunercial lot and the
residential lots to the west.
Slides were shown of the subject property.
Eight (8) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property.
No responses were received in favor and one response received in opposition.
Planning staff recommended approval of the request.
Chairman Nejad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
Hani Tohme, Golden Triangle Consulting Engineers, 2566 IH10 E, Suite 7 addressed the
Commissioners. Commissioner Senigaur asked if a privacy fence would be installed. Mr.
Tohme responded an 8 to 10 foot privacy fence. Commissioner Graves questioned what
type of business would be placed on the property. Mr. Tohme responded he was not sure
at the time and that things were still in the planning stages.
Glen Darden, 4180 Simpson Drive addressed the Commissioners and spoke against the
case.
Councilwoman Robin Mouton, 3390 Del Place addressed the Commissioners and spoke
against the case. Commissioner Senigaur addressed Councilwoman Mouton. Discussion
followed. Councilwoman Mouton stated that she did not receive a properly owner notice
of the case. Mr. Boone stated that the notices are only mailed to property owners within
200 feet of the subject property. Mr. Tobme addressed the Commissioners. Discussion
followed.
Kent Johns, 3225 Blossom addressed the Commissioners. Discussion followed. The
public hearing was closed. Commissioner Senigaur made a motion to approve a request
to rezone from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling to GC -MD (General
Commercial -Multiple Family Dwelling) or a more restrictive district as requested in File
2252-Z. Vice Chairman Craig seconded the motion. Motion to deny carried 3:4
(Chairman Nejad, Commissioner Graves, Commissioner Makin and Commissioner
Mason)
6) File 864-OB: Consider a request for an amendment to the Subdivision and Site
Development Regulations, Sections 26.01.006, 26.03.002, 26.03.004, and 26.03.008.
Applicant: City of Beaumont Planning & Community Development Department
Mr. Boone presented the staff report. Staff was recently approached about amending the
Subdivision and Site Development Regulations to allow rural -type subdivisions in an
area two miles beyond the city limits to the five (5) mile extraterritorial jurisdiction. This
three (3) mile Planning Area has experienced a limited amount of development in the
past and it is not expected that this area will be annexed any time in the near future.
Allowing this reduced standard within the Planning Area would encourage more
affordable development in the rural area, yet still be close to Beaumont. This would
ideally encourage the construction of more homes, with residents still being able to take
advantage of the goods and services offered by the region's largest city.
The recommended amendments are as follows:
Sec.26.01.006, Definitions
Amendment:
Planning Area. The Planning Area shall constitute an area beginning two (2) miles from
the corporate limits of the city and extending out an additional three (3) miles to the
boundary of the five (S) mile exti,aterritoi•ial jurisdiction.
Sec. 26.03.002, Streets
Amendment:
(12) For subdivisions located within the Planning Area, as defined herein, street
design, construction and acceptance shall be in accordance with the standards set forth
in the Jefferson County Subdivision and Development Regulations and approved by the
county engineer. Curbs are not required and open roadside ditches may be used for
drainage.
Sec. 26.03.004, Sidewalks
Amendment:
(4) For subdivisions located within the Planning Area, as defined herein, sidewalks
shall not be required
Sec. 26.03.008, Streetlights
Amendment:
(d) For subdivisions located within the Planning Area, as defined herein, streetlights
shall not be required.
Slides were shown of the subject property.
The Planning staff recommended approval of the request.
Chairman Ncjad opened the public hearing and asked for the applicant's comments.
Commissioner Mason questioned Mr. Boone about the road surface in the ETJ (Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction). Mr. Boone replied. Discussion followed.
Jefferson County Commissioner Eddie Arnold, 4655 Ashdown addressed the Commissioners.
Commissioner Arnold suggested that the Planning Commission and City Council consider a two
year warranty on the roads that they install and also consider annexing the property after the two
year warranty expires. Commissioner Makin asked who monitors the property during the
warranty period. Commissioner Arnold stated the developer would and then Jefferson County.
The case did not require a public hearing.
Vice Chairman Craig made a motion to approve a request for an amendment to the Subdivision
and Site Development Regulations, Sections 26.01.006, 26.03.002, 26.03.004, and 26.03.008
with the following amendments:
See.26.01.006, Definitions
Amendment:
Plannin Area. The Planning Area shall constitute an area beginning two (2) miles from
the corporate limits of the city and extending out an additional three (3) miles to the
boundary of the five (S) mile extr•aterr•itorial jurisdiction.
Sec. 26.03.002, Streets
Amendment:
(12) For subdivisions located n,ithin the Planning Area, as defined herein, street
design, construction and acceptance shall be in accordance moth the standards set forth
in the Jefferson County Subdivision and Development Regulations and approved by the
county engineer. Curbs are not required and open roadside ditches may be used for
drainage.
Sec. 26.03.004, Sidewalks
Amendment:
(4) For subdivisions located u4thin the Planning Area, as defined herein, sideivalks
shall not be required.
Sec. 26.03.008, Streetlights
Amendment:
(d) For subdivisions located within the Planning Area, as defined herein, streetlights
shall not be required.
Commissioner Senigaur seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7:0.
OTHER BUSINESS
THERE BEING_ NO OTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:10
P.M.
ABSTENTION AFFIDAV171
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON §
I, AV v , as a member of the Tkh;Yg o i (City Council, Commission, or
Board) make this affidavit and hereby on oath state the follo g: I, and/ a person or persons related to
me, have a substantial interest in a business entity that would be pecul arly affected by a vote or decision
of the (City Council, Commission, or Board) as those terms are defined in V.T_C.A.,
Local Government Code, § 171.002, L
The business entity is: Lay) ay) �}at, Stt6 1)
(Nam
(Address)
("I," or name of relative and relationship) have/has a substantial interest in this
business entity for the following reasons: (check all of which are applicable.)
Ownership of 10 percent or more of the voting -stock or shares of the business entity.
Ownership of either 10 percent or more or $15,000 or more of the fair market value of the
business entity.
Funds received from the -business entity exceed 10 percent of (my, her, his) gross
income for the previous year.
Real property is involved, and (I,.he, she) have an interest which is an equitable
or legal ownership with a fair market value of at least $2,500.
A relative of mine, within the first or second degree by blood or marriage, has a substantial
interest in the business entity or property that would be affected by a decision of the public
body of which I am a member.
Upon filing of this affidavit with the City Clerk, I affirm that I will abstain from voting on any decision involving
this business entity and from any further participation on this matter whatsoever.
Signed this the day of Te-, b v- k owi 20_�.
Signa ur of bYicial
C Orr' m+SSlb n e-V
Title
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared kl;,(0)-�-a'ves _
and on oath stated that the facts hereinabove stated are true to thp. best of his/her knowledge or belief.
SWORN to and subscribed before me
of.
FRAN M MALVO 'Notgrry Public in and for ffie SatU of Texas
My Commission Expires
December'12' 2016
201.
I���-r�L �,; ..
,I 1