HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET AUG 30 2005 I . I
City of Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 30,2005 1:30 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
* Invocation Pledge Roll Call
* Presentations and Recognition
* Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items 1-6/Consent
Agenda
* Consent Agenda
GENERAL BUSINESS
i1. Consider adoption of an Interim Order Ordinance seeking to have CenterPoint
Energy comply with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate
notice of its proposed increase and to base its request upon the proper test year as
defined by the Gas Utility Regulatory Act
2. Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the
Water Treatment Plant 14 Million Gallons Per Day(MGD) Expansion and
Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount for"extra work"
3. Consider approving a one year agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
for employee medical and dental insurance
4. Consider approving a two-year contract with Aetna, Inc. for Basic Life and
Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D), Supplemental Life and
Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance
5. Consider granting the City Manager authority to implement the contribution rate
changes for retirees in the medical plans
6. Schedule a second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget and schedule
the date of the meeting at which the City Council will vote on the 2005 (FY 2006)
• Proposed Tax Rate
WORK SESSION
* Review and discuss the proposed FY 2006 Budget and the proposed 2006 Capital
Program
GENERAL BUSINESS
7. PUBLIC HEARING: Receive comments on proposed FY 2006 Budget, proposed
2006 Capital Program and 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate
8. PUBLIC HEARING: Dilapidated Structures
Consider approval of an ordinance declaring certain structures to be dangerous
structures and ordering their removal within so many days
COMMENTS
Councilmembers/City Manager comment on various matters
Public Comment (Persons are limited to 3 minutes)
EXECUTIVE SESSION
* Consider matters related to contemplated or pending litigation in
accordance with Section 551.071 of the Government Code:
40 Brandon Steward v. City of Beaumont
Curtis Breaux et al v. City of Beaumont et al
Shane Landry v. City of Beaumont
Michael Charles, et al v. City of Beaumont
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids
or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 880-3725 a day prior to the meeting.
r
0 L
I
City of Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 30, 2005 1:30 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA
* Approval of minutes
* Confirmation of committee appointments
A) Approve a bid for the purchase and installation of a fire alarm system for the Police
Department
B) Approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Master Advance Funding
Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)
C) Approve a one (1) year contract for wastewater laboratory services
D) Approve a five (5) year renewal of a lease agreement with the Texas Military Facilities
Commission
E) Approve a three (3) renewal of an office space lease agreement for the Southeast Texas
Auto Theft Task Force
F) Approve a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a ten foot (10') wide water line
easement providing access for fire prevention services
A
A.. City of Beaumont
Council A enda Item
'M c g
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval to award a bid for the purchase and installation of
a fire alarm system for the Police Department.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends award of a bid for the purchase and installation of a fire alarm system
in the amount of$57,310 to Simplex Grinnell L.P. of Beaumont.
BACKGROUND
The Police Department building is currently protected by a series of smoke detectors primarily
located in the elevator shafts and at air-handling ducts. The fire alarm system specified in this bid
will allow for complete fire and smoke detection coverage throughout the entire building, and will
meet National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for detection devices. The system
will consist of a central processing unit, remote smoke and thermal heat detectors, and associate
electrical panels and wiring. The unit will communicate with the alarm monitoring company
currently under contract with the City via dedicated phone line. The system will utilize a battery
backup in the event of a power disruption. The system carries a warranty of two (2) years on
parts and one (1) year on labor.
Bid notices were provided to thirteen (13) vendors, with two (2) responding with bids. The bids
received are as follow:
Vendor Model Bid Completion Time Total Amount Bid
Simplex Grinnell L.P. Simplex Model 4100U 90 calendar days $57,310.00
Beaumont,TX '
Advanced Systems Notifier NFS-3030 90 calendar days $124,871.25
Beaumont,TX
Purchase and Installation of Fire Alarm System-Police Department
August 23, 2005
Page 2
Due to the variance in the bid amounts received, Building Services personnel has reviewed the
proposed system for compliance with specifications and NFPA requirements, and has determined
that it meets all aspects of the code. Conversations by Purchasing staff with the low bidder has
shown them to be confident in the bid amount submitted, and it is consistent with the original
budget estimate for the project.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Funds are available for this expenditure in the Capital Reserve Fund.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Internal Services Director and Police Chief.
B
LI ... Cat y of Beaumont Council A enda Item
�Z OL g
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 22, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
execute a Master Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT).
RECONEUENDATION
Administration recommends approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a
Master Advance Funding Agreement with TxDOT.
BACKGROUND
The Intermodal Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)and the Transportation
Equity Act for the 215` Century (TEA-21) authorized transportation programs to meet the
challenges of protecting and enhancing communities and the natural environment and advancing
the nations economic growth and competitiveness. These transportation programs provide federal
funds for the development and construction of local transportation improvements.
The Master Advance Funding Agreement provides the general contract language for any project
between the City and TxDOT that involves federal funding. Specific language dealing with each
individual project will be included in Local Project Advanced Funding Agreements (LPAFA).
The LPAFA will be prepared for the proposed Old Dowlen Road, Dowlen Road Extension,
Washington Boulevard and Downtown Streetscape Improvements Projects.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
An Advanced Funding Agreement for the Concord Road Project was approved by City Council
on September 30, 2003.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECONEWENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
MAFTxDOT.wpd
August 22,2005
STATE OF TEXAS §
SUNTY OF TRAVIS §
MASTER AGREEMENT
GOVERNING
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENTS
THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (MAFA) is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and
through the Texas Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "State", and the City of
Beaumont, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized officials, hereinafter called the "Local
Government."
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the lntermodat Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21-t Century(TEA 21)codified under Title 23 U.S.C. Section 101 et
seq., authorize transportation programs to meet the challenges of protecting and enhancing
communities and the natural environment and advancing the nation's economic growth and
Competitiveness; and
WHEREAS, ISTEA and TEA-21 establish federally funded programs for transportation improvements
to implement its public purposes; and
WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134 requires that Metropolitan Planning Organizations and the
46 tes' Transportation Agencies to develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of
State; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Code, Sections 201.103 and 222.052 establish that the State
shall design, construct and operate a system of highways in cooperation with local governments; and
WHEREAS, federal and state laws require local governments to meet certain contract standards
relating to the management and administration of State and federal funds; and
WHEREAS, the governing terms of this Master Agreement will provide for efficient and effective
contract administration of the types of Local Project Advance Funding Agreements (LPAFA) listed in
Attachment A;and,
WHEREAS, the Texas Government Code, Section 441.189 allows any state record to be created or
stored electronically in accordance with standards and procedures adopted as administrative rules of
the Texas State Library and Archives Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Government has approved entering into this Master
Agreement by resolution or ordinance, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Master
Agreement as Attachment B.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements
of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is
agreed as follows:
AGREEMENT
eriod of the Agreements
his Master Agreement and the Local Project Advance Funding Agreements (LPAFAs) subject to
this Master Agreement become effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the
Page 1 of 12
respective agreements fully executed. This Master Agreement shall remain in effect until
terminated as provided in Article 2.
2. Termination of this Master Agreement
This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions:.
a. by mutual written consent and agreement of a#parties.
b. by any party with 90 days written notice. if this Master Agreement is terminated under this
clause, all existing, fully executed LPAFAs made under this Master Agreement shall
automatically incorporate all the provisions of the Master Agreement.
c. by either party, upon: the failure of the other party to fulfill the obligations as set forth in this
Master agreement.
3. Termination of the Local Project Advance Funding Agreement(LPAFA)
An LPAFA shall remain in effect until the project is completed and accepted by all parties, unless:
a. the agreement is terminated in writing with the mutual consent of the parties, or;
b. because of a breach of this Master Agreement or a breach of the Local Project Advance
Funding Agreement. Any cost incurred due to a breach of contract shall be paid by the
breaching party.
c. After the PS&E the local government may elect not to provide the funding and the project does
not proceed because of insufficient funds; the local government agrees to reimburse the State
for its reasonable actual costs incurred during the project.
d. Conditions for termination as specified in the LPAFA are fulfilled.
4. Amendments
a. Amendment of this Master Agreement by Notice with Mutual Consent: The State may
notify the Local Government of changes in this Master Agreement resulting from changes
in federal or state laws or rules or regulations and these changes in the Master Agreement
shall be incorporated into this agreement unless the State is notified by the Local
Government within 60 days. From time to time, the State may issue numbered
restatements of this MAFA to wholly reflect its amendments.
b. This Master Agreement may be amended due to changes in the agreement or the
responsibilities of the parties. Such amendment must be made through a mutually agreed
upon, written amendment that is executed by the parties.
C. The notice of amendment and the amendment to this Master Agreement may be in an
electronic form to the extent permitted by law and after a prior written consent of the parties
to this agreement is made.
d. Amendments to the LPAFAs due to changes in the character of the work or terms of the
agreement, or responsibilities of the parties relating to a specific project governed under
this Master Agreement may be enacted through a mutually agreed upon, written
amendment to the LPAFA.
3. Remedies
This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any agreement
default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party to this
agreement and shall be cumulative.
6. Utilities
If the required right of way encroaches upon existing utilities and the proposed project requires
their adjustment, removal or relocation, the Local Government will be responsible for determining
Wthe scope of utility work and notify the appropriate utility company to schedule adjustments,
lest specified otherwise in a specific LPAFA under other provisions of this MAFA.
The Local Government shall be responsible for the adjustment, removal or relocation of utility
facilities in accordance with applicable State laws, regulations, rules, policies and procedures.
Page 2 of 12
,This includes, but is not limited to: 43 TAC §15.55 relating to Construction Cost Participation; 43
TAC §21.21 relating to State Participation: in Relocation, Adjustment, and/or Removal of Utilities;
and, 43 TAC§ 21.31 at seq. relating to Utility Accommodation. The Local Government will be
responsible for all costs associated with additional adjustment, removal, or relocation during the
construction of the project: unless this work is provided by the owners of the utility facilities:
a. per agreement;
b. per all applicable statutes or rules, or;
c. as specified otherwise in a LPAFA.
Prior to letting a construction contract for a local project, a utility certification must be made
available to the State upon request stating that all utilities needing to be adjusted for completion
of the construction activity have been adjusted.
7. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation
Development of a local transportation project must comply with the National Environmental Policy
Act and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which require environmental clearance of
federal-aid projects.
a. The Local Government is responsible for the identification and assessment of any
environmental problems associated with the development of a local project governed by this
agreement, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement.
b. The Local Government is responsible for the cost of any environmental problem's mitigation
and remediation, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement.
c. The Local Government is responsible for providing any public meetings or public hearings
required for development of the environmental assessment, unless provided for otherwise in
the specific project agreement.
The Local Government shall provide the State with written certification from appropriate
regulatory agency(ies) that identified environmental problems have been remediated, unless
provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement.
8. Compliance with Texas Accessibility Standards and ADA
All parties to this agreement shall ensure that the plans for and the construction of all projects
subject to this Master Agreement are in compliance with the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS)
issued by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, under the Architectural Barriers
Act, Article 9102, Texas Civil Statutes. The TAS establishes minimum accessibility requirements
to be consistent with minimum accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(P.L. 101-336) (ADA).
9. Architectural and Engineering Services
Any party to this contract may have responsibility for effecting the performance of architectural
and engineering services. Or, the parties may agree to be individually responsible for portions of
this work. The LPAFA shall define the party responsible for performance of this work.
The engineering plans shall be developed in accordance with the applicable State's Standard
Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges, and the
special specifications and special provisions related thereto, unless specifically stated otherwise
in the LPAFA and approved by the State.
In procuring professional services, the parties to this agreement must comply with federal
requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 172 if the project is federally funded and with Texas
Government Code 2254, Subchapter A, in all cases.
Nrofessional services contracts for federally funded projects must conform to federal
equirements, specifically including the provision for participation by Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises (DBEs), ADA, and environmental matters.
Page 3 of 12
Construction Responsthilitles
a. Unless specifically provided for otherwise in the LPAFA, the State shall advertise for
construction bids, issue bid proposals, receives and tabulate the bids and award and
administer the contract for construction of the Project. Administration of the contract includes
the responsibility for construction engineering and for issuance of any change orders,
supplemental agreements, amendments, or additional work orders, which may become
necessary subsequent to the award of the construction contract. In order to ensure federal
funding ellglbifity, projects must be authorized by the State prior to advertising for construction.
b. All .contract fatting and award procedures must be approved by the State prior to letting and
award of the construction contract, whether the construction contract is awarded by the State
or by the Local Government.
c. All contract change order review and approval procedures must be approved by the State prior
to start of construction.
d. Upon completion of the Project, the party constructing the project will issue and sign a
Notification of Completion"acknowledging the Projects.construction completion.
e. For federally funded contracts, the patties to this agreement will comply with federal
construction requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 635 and with requirements cited in 23 CFR
Part 633, and shall include the latest version of Form "FHWA-1273° in the contract bidding
documents. If force account work will be performed, a finding of cost effectiveness shall be
made in compliance with 23 CFR 635, Part B.
11. Project Maintenance
The Local Government shall be responsible for maintenance of locally owned roads after
completion of the work and the State shall be responsible for maintenance of state highway
&ystam after completion of the work if the work was on the state highway system, unless
therwise provided for in the LPAFA or other prior existing maintenance agreement with the Local
Government.
12. Local Project Sources and Uses of Funds
a. The total estimated cost of the Project will be clearly stated in the local project agreement.
The expected cash contributions from the federal, state, Local Governments or other parties
will be clearly stated. The State will pay for only those project costs that have been approved
by the Texas Transportation Commission.
b. A project cost estimate showing the estimated contributions in kind or in cash for each major
area of the local project will be provided in the LPAFA. This project cost estimate will show
how necessary resources for completing the project will be provided by major cost categories.
These Categories include but are not limited to: (1) costs of real property; (2) costs of utility
work; (3) costs of environmental assessment and remediation; (4) cost of preliminary
engineering and design; (5) cost of construction and construction management; and (6) any
other local project costs.
c. The State will be responsible for securing the Federal and State share of the funding required
for the development and construction of the local project. Federal share of the project will be
reimbursed to the local government on a cost basis.
d. The Local Government will be responsible for all non-federal or non-State participation costs
associated with the Project, including any overruns in excess of the approved local project
budget, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA.
e. Following execution of the LPAFA, but prior to the performance of any review work by the
State, the Local Government will remit a check or warrant made payable to the "Texas
Department of Transportation " in the amount specified in the LPAFA. The Local Government
will pay at a minimum its funding share for the estimated cost of preliminary engineering for
the project, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA.
Page 4 of 12
f. Sixty(60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids, the Local Government
shall remit its remaining financial share for the State's estimated construction oversight and
construction costs,unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA.
g. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the Local Government
at any time during the Project, the State will notify the Local Government in writing. The Local
Government will make payment to the State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's
written notification, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA.
h. Upon completion of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the local project costs. Any
funds due to the Local Government, the State, or the Federal government will be promptly
paid by the owing party.
i. The State will not pay interest on any funds provided by the Local Government.
j. If a waiver has been granted, the State will not charge the Local Government for the indirect
costs the State incurs on the focal project, unless this agreement is terminated at the request
of the Local Government prior to completion of the project.
k. If the local project has been approved for a "fixed price" or an "incremental payment' non-
standard funding or payment arrangement under 43 TAC §15.52, the LPAFA will clearly state
the amount of the fixed price or the incremental payment schedule.
I. The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts has determined that certain counties qualify as
Economically Disadvantaged Counties in comparison to other counties in the state as below
average per capita property value, and below average per capita income, and above average
unemployment, for certain years. The LPAFA will reflect adjustments to the standard
financing arrangement based on this designation.
m. The State will not execute the contract for the construction of a local project until the required
funding has been made available by the Local Government in accordance with the LPAFA.
Right of Way and Real Property
The Local Government is responsible for the provision and acquisition of any needed right of
way or real property, unless the State agrees to participate in the provision of right of way under
the procedures described herein as parts A and B of this provision.
Title to right of way and other related real property must be acceptable to the State before funds
may be expended for the improvement of the right of way or real property.
If the Local Government is the owner of any part of a project site under an LPAFA, the Local
Government shall permit the State or its authorized representative access to occupy the site to
perform all activities required to execute the work under the LPAFA.
All parties to this agreement will comply with and assume the costs for compliance with all the
requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title 42 U.S.C.A. Section 4601 et seq., including those
provisions relating to incidental expenses incurred by the property owners in conveying the real
property to the Local Government, and benefits applicable to the relocation of any displaced
person as defined in 49 CFR Section 24.2(g). Documentation to support such compliance must
be maintained and made available to the State and its representatives for review and
inspection.
If the local government purchases right of way for a local government street, title will be acquired
in the name of the local government in accordance with applicable laws unless specifically
stated otherwise in the LPAFA and approved by the State.
If the State participates in the purchase of right of way for the state, it will be under the
processes established in the following paragraphs A or B, and the selected option shall be
specified in the LPAFA.
Page 5 of 12
A. Purchase By the State for the State
The State will assume :responsibility for acquisition of all necessary right of way for the
highway project. The Local Government will voluntarily contribute to the State funds equal to
ten (10): percent of the cost of the right of way for the proper development and construction
of the state highway system and shall transmit to the State a warrant or check payable to the
Texas Department of Transportation when notified by the State of the estimated cost of the
right of way. If the amount Is found insufficient to pay the Local Governments obligation,
then the Local Government, upon request of the State, will supplement this amount in such
amount as requested by the State. Upon completion of the highway project and in the event
the total amount paid by the Local Government is more than ten (10) percent of the actual
cost of the right of way, any excess amount will be returned to the Local Government. Cost
of the right of way by the State shall mean the total value of compensation paid to owners,
including but not limited to utility owners, for their property interests either through
negotiations or eminent domain proceedings.
B. Purchase by the Local Government for the State
Purchase: Right of way purchases shall be a joint effort of the State and the Local
Government. Acquisition of right of way shall be in accordance with the terms of this
agreement and in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws governing the
acquisition policies for acquiring real property. The State agrees to reimburse the Local
Government for its share of the cost of such right of way providing acquisition when it has
been authorized to proceed by the State.
Location Surveys and Preparation of Right of Way Data: The State, without cost to the
Local Government, will do the necessary preliminary engineering and title investigation in
order to supply to the Local Government the data and instruments necessary to obtain
acceptable title to the desired right of way.
Determination of Right of Way Values: The Local Government agrees to make a
determination of property values for each right of way parcel by methods acceptable to the
Local Government and to submit to the State's District Office a tabulation of the values so
determined, signed by the appropriate Local Government representative. Such tabulations
shall list the parcel numbers, ownership, acreage and recommended compensation.
Compensation shall be shown in the component parts of land acquired, itemization of
improvements acquired, damages (if any), and the amounts by which the total
compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements. This tabulation shall be
accompanied by an explanation to support the determined values, together with a copy of
information or reports used in arriving at all determined values. Such work will be
performed by the Local Government at its expense without cost participation by the State.
The State will review the data submitted and may base its reimbursement on the values
which are determined by this review. The State, however, reserves the right to perform at
its own expense any additional investigation deemed necessary, including supplemental
appraisal work by State employees or by employment of fee appraisers, all as may be
necessary for determination of values to constitute the basis for State reimbursement. If at
any stage of the project development it is determined by mutual-agreement between the
State and Local Government that the requirement for the Local Government to submit to
the State property value determinations for any part of the required right of way should be
waived, the Local Government will make appropriate written notice to the State of such
waiver, such notice to be acknowledged in writing by the State. In instances of such waiver,
the State by its due processes and at its own expense will make a determination of values
to constitute the basis for State reimbursement.
Page 6 of 12
Negotiations: The State will notify the Local Government as soon as possible as to the
State's determination of value. Negotiation and settlement with the property owner will be
the responsibility of the Local Government without participation by the State; however, the
Local Government will notify the State immediately prior to closing the transaction so that a
current title investigation may be made to determine if there has been any change in the
title. The Local Government will deliver properly executed instruments of conveyance which
together with any curative instruments found to be necessary as a result of the State's title
investigation will be properly vest title in the State for each right of way parcel involved. The
costs incidental to negotiation and the costs of recording the right of way instruments will
be the responsibility of the Local Government, The cost of title investigation will be the
responsibility of the State.
Condemnation: Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the
Local Government and will be the Local Government's responsibility at its own expense
except as hereinafter indicated. The Local Government will obtain from the State without
cost current title information and engineering data at the time condemnation are to be
indicated. Except as hereinafter set forth the Local Government will concurrently file
condemnation proceedings and a notice of lis pendens for each case in the name of the
State, and in each'case so filed the judgment of the court wily decree title to the property
condemned to the State. The Local Government may, as set forth herein under "Excess
Takings" and where it is determined to be necessary, enter condemnation proceedings in
its own name. Property acquired in the Local Government's name for the State must
comply with requirements set forth in the engineering data and title investigation previously
furnished to the Local Government by the State at such time as the Local Government
conveys said property to the State.
Court Costs, Costs of Special Commissioners' Hearings and Appraisal ppraisal Expense: Court
costs and costs of Special Commissioners' hearings assessed against the State or Local
Government in condemnation proceedings conducted on behalf of the State and flees
incident thereto will be paid by the Local Government. Such costs and fees, with the
exception of recording fees, will be eligible for ninety (9o) percent State reimbursement
under the established reimbursement procedure provided such costs and fees are eligible
for payment by the State under existing law. Where the Local Government uses the State's
appraisers employed on a fee basis in Special Commissioners' hearings or subsequent
appeals, the cost of the appraiser for updating the report, for preparing new reports,
preparing for court testimony and appearing in court to testify in support of the appraisal
will be paid direct by the Local Government, but will be eligible for ninety (9o) percent State
reimbursement under established procedure provided prior approval for such appraiser has
been obtained from the State. The fee paid the appraiser by the Local Government shall
be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in the appraiser's contract for appraisal
services with the State.
Excess Takings: in the event the Local Government desires to acquire.land in excess of
that requested by the State for right of way purposes, the State's cost participation will be
limited to the property needed for its purposes. If the Local Government elects to acquire
the entire property, including the excess taking, by a single instrument of conveyance or in
one eminent domain proceeding, the property involved will be acquired in the name of the
Local Government and that portion requested by the State for right of way will be
separately conveyed to the State by the Local Government. When acquired by negotiation,
the State's participation will be based on the State's approved value of that part of the
Property requested for right of way purposes, provided that such approved value does not
exceed actual payment made by the Local Government. When acquired by condemnation,
the State's participation will be in the proportionate part of the final judgment amount
Page 7 of 12
I
computed on the basis of the relationship of the State's approved value to the State's
predetermined value for the whole property.
Improvements: Property owners will be afforded an opportunity in the negotiations to
retain any or all of their improvements in the right of way taking. In anticipation of the owner
desiring to retain improvements, the State's approved value will include the amounts by
which the upper limit of State participation will be reduced for the retention. It is further
agreed that the upper limit for the State`s participation in the Local Government's cost for
an improved parcel will be reduced as shown in the State's approved value where the
owner retains an improvement which is to be moved by either the Local Government or the
owner. In the event improvements, which are, in whole or part, a part of the right of way
taking are not retained by the owner;title is to be secured in the name of the State.
The State will participate in the acquisition of a structure severed by the right of way line if
the part of the house, building or similar structure which lies outside the,right of way cannot
be reconstructed adequately or there is nothing but salvage left, provided that the State's
value is established on this basis and provided that title to the entire structure is taken in
the name of the State. The State shall dispose of all improvements acquired. The net
revenue derived by the State from the disposition of any improvements sold through the
General Services Commission will be credited to the cost of the right of way procured and
shared with the Local Government.
Relocation of Utilities on Acquired State Right of Way: If the required right of way
encroaches upon an existing utility located on its own right of way and the proposed
highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of the utility facility, the
State will establish the necessity for the utility work. State participation in the cost of
making the necessary change, less any resulting increase in the value to the utility and less
any salvage value obtainable, may be obtained by either the "actual cost" or "lump sum"
procedures. Reimbursement under "actual cost" will be made subsequent to the Local
Government's certification that the work has been completed and will be made in an
amount equal to ninety (90) percent of the eligible items of cost as paid to the utility owner.
The "lump sum" procedure requires that the State establishes the eligibility of the utility
work and enters into a three-party agreement, with the owners of the utility facilities and the
Local Government, which sets forth the exact lump sum amount of reimbursement, based
on a prior appraisal. The utility will be reimbursed by the Local Government after proper
certification by the utility that the work has been done, said reimbursement to be the basis
of the prior lump sum agreement. The State will reimburse the Local Government in an
amount equal to ninety (90) percent of the firm commitment as paid to the utility owner.
The foregoing is subject to the provision that the individual lump sum approved value shall
not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In those cases where a
single operation is estimated to exceed $20,000 the transaction will be brought to the
attention of the State for determination of proper handling based upon the circumstances
involved. Such utility firm commitment will be an appropriate item of right of way. The
adjustment, removal or relocation of any utility line on publicly owned right of way by
sufferance or permit will not be eligible for State reimbursement, The term "utility" under
this agreement shall include publicly, privately and cooperatively owned utilities.
Fencing Requirements: The Local Government may either pay the property owner for
existing right of way fences based on the value such fences contribute to the part taken
and damages for an unfenced condition resulting from the right of way taking, in which
case the estimated value of such right of way fences and such damages will be included in
the recommended value and the approved value, or the Local Government may do the
fencing on the property owner`s remaining property.
Page 8 of 12
Where the Local Government performs right of way fencing as a part of the total right of
way consideration, neither the value of existing right of way fences nor damages for an
unfenced condition will be included in the recommended value or the approved value.
State participation in the Local Government's cost of constructing right of way fencing on
the property owner's remainder may be based on either the actual cost of the fencing or on
a predetermined lump sum amount. The State will be given credit for any salvaged fencing
material and will not participate in any overhead costs of the Local Government.
If State participation is to be requested on the lump sum basis, the State and the Local
Government will reach an agreement prior to the actual accomplishment of the work as to
the necessity, eligibility and a firm commitment as to the cost of the entire fencing work to
be performed. The foregoing is subject to the provision that the lump sum approved cost
shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In the event the
cost of the fencing is estimated to exceed $20,000, the transaction will be brought to the
attention of the State for determination of proper handling based upon the circumstances
involved.
Reimbursement. The State will reimburse the Local Government for right of way acquired
after the date of this agreement in amount not to exceed ninety(90) percent of the cost of
the right of way acgtdred in accordance with the terms and provisions of this agreement.
The State's reimbursement will be in the amount of ninety {90} percent of the State's
predetermined value of each parcel, or the net cost thereof, whichever is the lesser
amount.
If condemnation is necessary and title is taken as set forth herein under the section entitled
"Condemnation," the participation by the State shall be based on the final judgment,
conditioned upon the State having been notified in writing prior to the filing of such suit and
upon prompt notice being given as to all action taken therein. The State shall have the right
to become a party to the suit at any time for all purposes, including the right of appeal at
any stage of the proceedings. All other items of cost shall be borne by the State and the
Local Government as provided in other sections of this agreement. if a lump sum fencing
or utility adjustment agreement has been executed, the State will reimburse the Local
Government in the amount of nine 90
ninety f ) percent of the predetermined lump sum cost of
the right of way fencing or utility adjustment.
If the Local Government prefers not to execute a lump sum agreement for either fencing or
utility adjustments, the State will reimburse on the actual cost of such fencing or
adjustments. The Local Government`s. request for reimbursement will be supported by a
breakdown of the labor, materials and equipment used.
General: it is understood that the terms of this agreement shall apply to new right of way
authorized and requested by the State which is needed and not yet dedicated, in use or
previously acquired in the name of the State or Local Government for highway, street or
road purposes. This agreement shalt also apply,with regard to any existing right of way, to
outstanding property interests not previously acquired and to eligible utility adjustments not
previously made,as authorized and requested by the State.
It is further understood that if unusual circumstances develop in the right of way acquisition
which are not clearly covered by the terms of this agreement, such unusual circumstances
or problems will be resolved by mutual agreement between the State and the Local
Government.
Page 9 of 12
Notices
All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be delivered
personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid or sent by electronic mail,
(electronic notice being permitted to the extent permitted by law but only after a separate written
consent of the parties), addressed to such party at the following addresses:
Local Government: State:
City of Beaumont Texas Department of Transportation
Attn:City Manager Attn:District Engineer
P.O.Box 3827 8354 Eastex Freeway
Beaumont,Texas 77704-3827 Beaumont,Texas 77748
All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the mail, unless
otherwise provided herein. Either party may change the above address by sending written notice
of the change to the other party. Either party may request in writing that such notices shall be
delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail and such request shall be honored and carried out
by the other party.
15. Legal Construction
In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held
invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall
not affect any other provisions and this agreement shall be construed as if it did not contain the
invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision.
0 Responsibilities of the Parties
The State and the Local Government agree that neither party is an agent, servant, or employee
of the other party and each party agrees it is responsible for its individual acts and deeds as well
as the acts and deeds of its contractors, employees, representatives, and agents.
17. Ownership of Documents
Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the State shall
remain the property of the State. All data prepared under this agreement shall be made available
to the State without restriction or limitation on their further use. All documents produced or
approved or otherwise created by the Local Government shall be transmitter( to the State in the
form of photocopy reproduction on a monthly basis as required by the State. The originals shall
remain the property of the Local Government.
18. Compliance with Laws
The parties shall comply with all Federal, State, and Local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and
regulations, and the orders and decrees of any,courts or administrative bodies or tribunals in any
manner affecting the performance of this agreement. When required, the Local Government
shall furnish the State with satisfactory,proof of this compliance.
19. Sole Agreement
This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties and supersedes
any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the agreement's subject
matter.
Page 10 of 12
Cost Principles
In order to be reimbursed with federal funds, the parties shall comply with the Cost Principles
established in OMB Circular A-87 that specify that all reimbursed costs are allowable, reasonable
and allocable to the Project.
21. Procurement and Property Management Standards
The parties shall adhere to the procurement standards established in Title 49 CFR §18.36 and
with the property management standard established in Title 49 CFR§18.32.
22. Inspection of Books and Records
The parties to the agreement shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records
and other documentation relating to costs incurred under this agreement and shall make such
materials available to the State, the Local Government, and, if federally funded, the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), and the U.S. Office of the Inspector General, or their duly
authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office during the contract period and
for four (4) years from the date of completion of work defined under this contract or until any
impending litigation, or claims are resolved. Additionally, the State, the Local Government, and
the FHWA and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to all the governmental
records that are directly applicable to this agreement for the purpose of making audits,
examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions.
23. Office of Management and Budget(OMB)Audit Requirements
The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502,
ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in OMB Circular No. A-128
through August 31, 2000 and stipulated in OMB Circular A-133 after August 31, 2000.
Civil Rights Compliance
The Local Government shall comply with the regulations of the Department of Transportation as
they relate to nondiscrimination (49 CFR Chapter 21 and 23 CFR §710.405(B)), and Executive
Order 11246 titled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 and
supplemented in the Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60).
25. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Requirements
The parties shall comply with the Disadvantaged/Minority Business Enterprise Program
requirements established in 49 CFR Part 26.
26. Debarment Certifications
The parties are prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party that is debarred or
suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance
Programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension." The parties to this
contract shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order awarded under this contract to
certify its eligibility to receive Federal funds and, when requested by the State, to furnish a
of the certification in accordance with Title 49 CFR Part 29(Debarment and Suspension). copy
27. Lobbying Certification
In executing this Master Agreement, the signatories certify to the best of his or her knowledge and
belief, that:
a. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the parties to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of
any federal grants the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative
Page 11 of 12
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modificgtion of any
federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
b. if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with federal contracts; grants, loans, or cooperative agreements, the signatory for
the Local Government shall complete and submit the federal Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure
Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
c. The parties shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts
under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly.
By executing an LPAFA Linder this Master Agreement, the parties reaffirm this lobbying
certification with respect to the individual projects and reaffirm this certification of the material
representation of facts upon which reliance will be made. Submission of this certification is a
prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Title 31 U.S.C. §1352. Any
person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than
$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
28. Signatory Warranty
The signatories to this agreement warrant that each has the authority to enter into this agreement
on behalf of the party represented.
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in
Iicate counterparts.
E LOCAL GOVERNMENT
By:
Name
Title:
Date:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executed for the Executive Director and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission for the
Purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs
heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission.
By:
Janice Mullenix
Director of Contract Services Section
Office of General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Date:
Page 12 of 12
ATTACHMENT A
TYPES OF LPAFA FUNDING CATEGORIES UNDER THE MAFA
Federal Categories Prefix Federal Categories Prefix
Interstate Demnstraiton Projects
interstate 1 Hi Prr-tority Corridor on NHS DPR
Interstate Maintenance IM Rural Access Projects DPR
Interstate 414 Discretionary IDR Innovative Projects DPI
Interstate Constr-Discretionary ID Priority Intermodai Projects DPM
Congestion Corridor IVH/ITS
Bl id es High Priority Projects HP
Bridge Repair/Rehab On- tear BR/BH
Offter
National Highway System NH
Surface Transportation Program Forest Highways FH
Urban Mobili /Rehab STP-I
Areas<200,000 STATE CATEGORIES
Enhancement STP-TE
Metro Mobili /Rehab STP-MM Preventive Maintenance CPM
Urban Mobir 1Rehab Farmta-Market/Farm-to-Market Rehab A/AR
Urban&Rural Rehabilitation STP-R District Discretionary CD
WMobili Rehab STP-RM State Funded Rehab C
,- Crossin Protective Devices STP-RXP Park Road C
-H Crossing Hazard Elimination STP-RXH State Funded Mobility C
Railroad gradeSeparations STP-RGS PASS/PASS Metro Match C
Safety-Hazard Elimination STP-HES Traffic Signals,Signing&Pavement C
Markin s
Miscellaneous C
Con estlon 6fli ation&Air Quality, CM Railroad Replanking CRX
Donor State Banos* State,Funded Landscape C/CL
CLM
Any Area DB State Urban Street CUM
Areas>200,000 DBM
Areas<200,000 DBU fathers 1_PAFA exception
Minimum Guarantee MG Off-System Bridges Program BROX
'ISTEA Funding Categories-Not Re-
establishes!in TEA 21
Page 1 of 1 Attachment A
ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE
Page 1 of 1 Attachment B
c
it... Cit of Beaumont
y� Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a one(1)year contract for wastewater laboratory
services.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends award of a one (1) year contract to Anacon, Inc. of Houston for
sampling, testing and analysis of wastewater at the unit costs indicated on the attached tabulation,
with an estimated total annual expenditure of$43,743.00.
BACKGROUND
Bids were requested for an annual contract for wastewater laboratory services to identify pollutant
levels at various stages of the wastewater treatment cycle within the Water Reclamation Plant.
The number of samples and the variety of pollutants for which the city is required to test has been
increased substantially in recent years. The analytical testing is mandated and monitored by both
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
Bid notices were provided to eleven (11) vendors with four (4) responding with bids as reflected
in the attached bid tabulation. Water personnel have reviewed the low bidder's qualifications, and
recommend Anacon, Inc. for the award.
Water samples are drawn by City personnel, packed appropriately, and will be delivered to the
awarded vendor's lab via commercial shipper (at vendor's expense), or will be picked up by
vendor personnel at the wastewater plant. The company is currently making twice weekly sample
pickups in Port Arthur, and will incorporate the City wastewater plant into that schedule. City
personnel will coordinate sampling and pickups with the awarded vendor to ensure compliance
with state regulations regarding time-sensitive analytical testing.
Annual Contract for Water Treatment Chemicals
August 23, 2005
Page 2
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Funds are available for this expenditure in the Water Utilities Department's operating budget.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Internal Services Director and Water Utilities Director.
BID TABULATION FOR WASTEWATER LABORATORY SERVICES
BID NUMBER: rf0605-37
BID OPENING DATE:JULY 14,2005
Chemtex Anacon, Inc. Severn Trent Ana-Lab Corporation
Port Arthur,TX Houston,TX Houston,TX (i<ilgore;TX
Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
MAJOR INDUSTRIAL USER MONITORING SURVEY
38 Biochemical Oxygen Demand-Sday $17.10 $649.80 w ;" F$�1500 �'=�' � "^OQ,y $20.00 $760.00 $15.00 $570.00
38 Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.60 $478.80 ,' 'S` 0 " $17.00 $646.00 $21.00 $798.00
38 Total Suspended Solids $8.55 $324.90 y Q" 1' 0'`' $10.00 $380.00 $15.00 $570.00
•,� $42.00 $1,$25.20 $957.60 596.00 $35.00 $1,330.00
38 Oil&Grease
38 Total Cyanide $22.73 $863.74 "` '" $30.00 $1,140.00 $30.00 $1,140.00
38 Total Phenol $23.63 $897.94 fW I„ , ,1 00 ^ „a: O $35.00 $1,330.00 $30.00 $1,140.00
Ttal 38 Nickel,4SeleniumS Silver,Zinc,)nc,)'Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury, $75.60 $2,872.80 n`y SQ ,b' $80,00 $3,040.00 $130.00 $4,940.00
20 Hexavalent Chromium $17.10 $342.00 ,, , , 0 l!> )w $15.00 $300.00 $25.00 $500.00
s SGT-HEM $26.55 $132.75 + '„ t7 $45.00 $225.00 $35.00 $175.00
20 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment 1 $360.00 $7,200.00 $U 00 ,. '' " $575.00 $11,500.00 $1,100.00 $22,000.00
20 Additional Analysis,Attachment 1 $135.00 $2,700.00 4, ,, _ -.`a�004 0`r ' +; $145.00 $2,900.00 $220.00 $4,400.00
Total-Major Industrial User Survey $17,420.33 +..„u, ; . ' a` $23,817.00 $37,563.00
Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
ORGANICS
GC or GC/MS scan for all 46 base/neutral,all 31 volatile organic,an
12 11 acid priority pollutant compounds $288.00 $3,456.00 1;t, ,! 270 Ok ., I pp;` $400.00 $4,800.00 $378.00 $4,536.00
GC/MS scan for the following pollutants listed in 40 CFR,PT.122,
Appendix D,Table V: Dimethyl Amine,Epichlorohydrin,
7 Formaldehyde,Ethylene Diamine,Triethylamine and Xylene. $180.00 $1,260.00 "" $7000 ,, $160.00 $1,120.00 $278.00 $1,946.00
GC analysis for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TPH)and Total
5 BTEX(Benzene,Toluene,Ethylbenzene,and Xylene) $90.00 $450.00 r0, , $90.00 $450.00 $105.40 $527.00
5 GC/MS scan for X lene,Acetone,and Dioxane $67.501 $337.50 SOQQ ,' ,fi' 4pQQ''i^ $75.001 $375.001 $54.401 $272.00
Total-Organics $5,503.50 ai ;'ti �zs a. a' Q:0 $6,745.001 $7,281.00
Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
MINOR COMMERCLUJINDUSTRIAL USER
40 Biochemical Oxygen Demand-5 day $17.10 $684.00 ,' „ sa1�':UQ= :'$ QOh` 0: $20.00 $800.00 $15.00 $600.00
40 Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.60 $504.00 ' , 15 $17.00 $680.00 $21.00 $840.00
40 Total Suspended Solids $8.55 $342.00 a µ', ", �' 0� w„ ," 0 .D$ $10.00 $400.00 $15.00 $600.00
$22.50 $15 $42.00 $2,100.00 $35.00 50 $1,750.00
Metals 20 Nickel,8eleniumCSidlveir,and Zinc)Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury, $75.60 $1,512.00 %*s„* ,„�$O;OUz ` 11a p00'` $80.00 $1,600.00 $130.00
$2,600.00
2 140 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table rl $288.00 $576.00 1 ;, ',' ,¢,7Q QQ Xq x'00:: $400.001 $800.00 $745.00 $1,490.00
2 140 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $189.00 & " ( 0` Q, ;�: 20 ' + $175.00 $350.00 $225.00 $450.00
2 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $720.00 ` '`' $Q bQ <`i'M ; Q 0,; $575.00 j $1,150.00 $1,100.00 $2,200.00
2 Additional Analysis,per Attachment I $135.00 $270.00 70,. Op ' :" 4 0` $145.001 $290.001 $220.00 $440.00
Total-Minor Commercial/Industrial User $5,922.00 .,r.. 5 ,90 0` $8,170.00 $10,970.00
BID TABULATION FOR WASTEWATER LABORATORY SERVICES
BID NUMBER: rf06O5-37
BID OPENING DATE:JULY 14,2005
IChemtex Anacon, Inc. I Severn Trent Ana-Lab Corporation
Port Arthur,TX Houston,TX Houston,TX Kilgore,TX
Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
MINOR COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL USER
4 Biochemical Oxygen Demand-5 day $17.10 $68.40 x ; .-; 15?00 ,`i,„ Q,; $20.00 $80.00 $15.00 $60.00
4 Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.60 $50.40 �,`,, ` >#15"QUOf'0', $17.00 $68.00 $21.00 $84.00
4 Total Suspended Solids $8.55 $34.20 .t; ti55'0,0 2Q= 0 $10.00 $40.00 $15.00 $60.00
4 Oil&Grease $22.50 $90.00 '.#k1 5 005, (!0% $42.00 $168.00 $35.00 $140.00
2 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $576.00 _s ".$, 7 0 0 00 $400.00 $800.00 $745.00 $1,490.00
4 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table]II $94.50 $378.00 00 0 +tr ,"., ' ' ,:' r $175.00 $700.00 $225.00 $900.00
2 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $720.00 $,¢t)D' ^'QO; $575.00 $1,150.00 $1,100.00 $2,200.00
2 Additional Analysis,per Attachment I $135.00 $270.00 S7s,Q9;' 0 r r'', ',' $145.00 $290.00 $220.00
$440.00
Total-Minor Commercial/Residential User $2,187.00 ,,,, „', ', 'F2 D 0. $3,296.00 $5 374.00
Description Unit I Total Unit Total Unit I Total Unit Total
RAW WASTEWATER INFLUENT
6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.001 $1,728.00 i „ 527,0: 0 `< 1r2Q Qp,, $400.00 $2,400.00 $745.00 $4,470.00
6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.501 $567.00 aOQ00, ,t 6. °`0't $175.00 $1,050.00 $225.00 $1,350.00
6 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.001 $2,160.00 .4 00 , 8 :Q, $575.001 $3,450.001 $1,100,001 $6,600.00
6 Additional Analysis,AttachmentI $135.00 $810.00 w{,`"'. 5,7,,0:00 ,,_,„;.:. 4p,Q0'. $145.00 $870.00 $220.00 $1,320.00
Total-RawWastewaterInfluent $5,265.00 .tit;;, w., k' 54 20,;. Q;, $7,770.00 $13,740.00
Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND INFLUENT
,.
6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $1,728.00 ��'�� �5270;00 �.� ��6 Ox QF. $400.001 $2,400.00 $745.00 $4,470.00
6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $567.00 +� t1�Q0410 w p, ,; $175.00 $1,050.00 $225.00 $1,350.00
6 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $2,160.00 ` *N ," , , OOµO #,° 2r�8D0 , $575.00 $3,450.00 $1,100.00 $6,600.00
6 Additional Analysis,Attachment I $135.00 $810.00 ,,' ,,.' 7D;'DO r t„! 42U .d- $145.00 $870.00 $220.00 $1,320.00
Total-Constructed Wetland Influent $5,265.00tT A RJ2Q 0;0 $7,770.00 1 $13,740.00
Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND EFFLUENT
1 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $288.00 s�I:a 270s00 _,,„ �7,0 OQs+ $400.00 $400.00 $745.00 $745.00
4 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $378.00 1"+ ;?^ 1A0 00 ,k "a4Q04 0' $175.00 $700.00 $225.00 $900.00
1 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $360.00 ,� ,, 00� >r $ OQ $575.001 $575.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00
4 Additional Analysis,Attachment 1 $135.00 $540.00 ? _, Of �,,,, OQ�� $145,001 $580.00 $220.00 $880.00
2 Gl hosate $180.00 $360.00 „ „r< SSQ:0,0 , a;'S16 '001 $150.001 $300.00 $215.00 $430.00
Total-Constructed Wetland Effluent $1,926.00 ,1`;=""."„ „'r`x :514' OS` D $2,555.001 $4,055.00
BID TABULATION FOR WASTEWATER LABORATORY SERVICES
BID NUMBER: rf0605-37
BID OPENING DATE:JULY 14,2005
Chemtex Anacon, Inc. Severn Trent. Ana-Lab Corporation
Port Arthur;TX Houston,TX Houston,TX Kilgore,TX
Descri tion Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
Qty DEWATERED BIOSOLIDS
6 40 CFR Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $1,728.00 a27„0,0 ., 11,41462 0 00,: $400.00 $2,400.00 $745.00 $4,470.00
6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $567.00 „ 1,QU 00; � 600: w $175.00 $1,050.00 $225.00 $1,350.00
6 Molybdenum $16.20 $97.20 i' � '„'", 8 0� ',; 4$-O: $10.00 $60.00 $24.75 $148.50
i Complete TCLP(Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure) $450.00 $450.00 :`, .$' S.O Q4 J"0;0 $675.00 $675.00 $710.00 $710.00
6 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $2,160.00 =' h S3 4 0 :"" 2 0,09 $575.00 $3,450.00 $1,100.00 $6,600.00
$7,635.00 $13,278.50
Total-Dewatered Biosolids $5,002.20
TOTAL BID AMOUNT 548 491.03 ��S4374,3 Op,Y $67 758.00 $106,001.50
D
City of Beaumont
Lu Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 25, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider renewal of a lease agreement for the Texas Military
Facilities Commission.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends the five-year renewal of a lease agreement for property the Texas
Military Facilities Commission (TMFC) presently occupies at 3040 College Street.
BACKGROUND
TMFC, formerly known as the Texas National Guard Armory Board, leases a 2.5 acre tract of
City property, bounded by College Street on the South, and Central Park on the North. The
TMFC uses this location as a training facility for a unit of the Texas National Guard.
A lease agreement has existed between the City and TMFC since 1965. The current agreement,
dated November 1984, gives TMFC an exclusive right to the property until 2015. Extensions of
the agreement must be made in five (5) year increments. The TMFC has exercised that extension
option three (3) times since the initial term. The current extension will expire November 15,
2005. TMFC has submitted a request to extend the lease agreement for another five-year term,
expiring on November 15, 2010.
TMFC informed the City recently that The Texas National Guard is being reorganized and will
be affected by the Base Realignment and Closure(BRAC)that is being implemented by the federal
government. It is likely that the Beaumont facility will no longer be needed in the 2008-2012 time
frame; however, it is too early to know for sure. Should BRAC affect the Beaumont facility, the
lease would be terminated prior to the proposed expiration date of November 15, 2010.
Texas Military Facilities Commission Lease Agreement Renewal
August 25, 2005
Page 2
Attached for your review is a copy of the current lease agreement.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The consideration paid by the lessee for the original lease was a nominal $10. All subsequent
renewals have been without a fee. A rental fee is not a prerequisite to the granting of an
extension.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Internal Services Director.
C:\DOamema aM Sebin9a\b11M1\My Documena\WPDGCS\Leaa\T%National Guard M—y\2005 U -T,No G...d\,W,Item-Lase Eat-T%Kvw"Guard-3005.wpd
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE
PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON §
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT made this the 15th day of
November , A.D. 1984, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT,
a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, acting herein by
and through its duly authorized City Manager and attesting by its
City Secretary (hereinafter referred to as "Lessor") and the
TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY BOARD, a body politic and
corporate of the State of Texas, acting herein by and through its
duly authorized Executive Director (hereinafter referred to as
"Lessee"):
W I T N E S S E T H
Whereas, the parties hereto previously entered into a written
indenture or lease agreement for a term which ends on the 15th
day of November, 1985; and
Whereas, the agreement grants to the Texas National Guard
Armory Board as Lessee the option to renew the lease for use of
the subject property as a training facility of a unit of the Texas
National Guard; and
Whereas, the agreement authorizes Lessee to sublease the
subject property to the Adjutant General of the State of Texas for
use by the Texas National Guard and related military purposes;
and
Whereas, the subject property has been and continues to be
leased to the Adjutant General of the State of Texas; and
Whereas, Lessee complied with all obligations, duties and
responsibilities imposed on it under the lease agreement;
Now, Therefore, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS ($ 10.00 } cash,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, and
the covenants and conditions hereinafter recited, Lessor has leased
and demised and by these presents does lease and demise unto
Lessee all that certain tract or pracel of land located in the City
of Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, and more particularly
described as follows, to-wit:
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of that certain
6.1601 acre tract leased by the City of Beaumont,
Texas to the United States of America under
supplemental agreement No. 1 to Lease No. DA-41-243-
Eng-613, same being dated December 11 , 1951;
THENCE north 000 02' east along the west line of said
above mentioned 6.1601 acre tract 315.75 feet to
corner;
THENCE south 891 59' west 344.89 feet to corner;
THENCE south 001 02' west 315.75 feet to corner; said
point being 50 feet north of the present north line of
College Street;
THENCE north 891 59' east along a line parallel with
and 50 feet distant from the present north line of
College Street 344.89 feet to the place of BEGINNING.
The above described tract contains 2.50 acres, more or
less.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises for the period of five
(5) years, commencing on the 15th day of November, A.D. 1985,
and ending on the 15th day of November, A.D. 1990, and for such
further periods as this lease may be extended as hereinafter
provided upon the following terms and conditions:
I.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties
hereto that the above described property may be sublet by the
Lessee to the Adjutant General of the State of Texas according to
the laws of this State, but in the event the Adjutant General
should for any reason fail to pay the rent prescribed in such
lease, or in the event the Legislature should fail to appropriate
money for the payment of said rent, then in either of such events,
Lessee may sublet the premises to any person whomsoever at the
highest. rental obtainable; provided, however, that the City of
Beaumont, Texas, shall have the first option to sublease such
premises upon the same terms and conditions that the property was
subleased prior to the occurrence of the events above mentioned.
2
II.
Lessee hereby agrees that at the termination of this lease,
either by forfeiture or for any cause whatsoever, any and all
improvements, structures and fixtures located on said demised
premises shall become the sole property of the Lessor.
III.
The State of Texas is not and shall not be responsible for
any damage or injury to said leased property regardless of how
the same may occur during the existence of this lease.
. This contract is entered into by and between the Lessor and
the Lessee upon the express condition and understanding that
neither the National Guard units to occupy said premises, nor
their officers, nor any member of the Texas National Guard
Armory Board shall in any wise be personally liable hereunder and
that Lessor is entitled to payment only out of the State
appropriations lawfully applicable to payment of the rental
stipulated in this lease.
IV.
It is expressly agreed and understood that at the expiration
of the primary term of this lease, Lessee shall have the exclusive
option to lease said premises for additional periods of five (5)
years in five (5) year increments extending over the twenty-five
(25) year period following the expiration of the primary term of
this lease. It is the intention of the parties hereto that, provided
Lessee exercises any such option by giving Lessor notice thereof
in writing within ninety (90) days of the expiration of the term of
.the then current lease, Lessor gives and grants unto Lessee such
options to renew this lease at rentals to be agreed upon, at said
intervals, and that the City of Beaumont as Lessor retains the
right to approve any and all renewal options which may be
exercised. /
EXECUTED this the IP day of
A.D. 1984, the CITY OF BEAUMONT signing by and through its
City,Manager, 21 N11/1p,f,4p,gI p , duly authorized to execute
the same by resolution passed by the City Council on
3
the same by resolution passed by the City Council on
�)eeemd e,e /a 19 a9l/, attesting by its City Secretary,
and countersigning by its City Auditor,
THorrt�4s f! iLoctJRANC� and the TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD
ARMORY BOARD, signing by and through its Executive Director.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
ATTEST:
By
city manager
—amity Secretary
COUNTERSIGNED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
<�•emaa.p�atlUrhLicC_Qt `
City Attorney
City Audi tor
-LESSOR-
TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD
ARMORY BOARD
B y
Donald err
Executive Director
-LESSEE-
4
L
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in
and for �sj�id County and State, on this day personally appeared
k'e/ jlgee 5Eee— , City Manager of the City of
Beaumont, known tojme to be the person whose name is subscribed
to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same as the act and deed of the City of Beaumont for
the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the
capacity therein stated.
Given under my hand and seal of office on this the
day of Dec,mlyb.-e 1984.
Notary Ptiblic in and for
Jefferson County,, /Texas
(Type or Print Nameo
My Commission Expires:
!9-
THE STATE OF TEXAS
§
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in
and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared
DONALD J. KERR, Executive Director of the TEXAS NATIONAL
GUARD ARMORY BOARD, known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
to me that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein
stated.
Given under my hand and seal of office on this the 15th
day.of November 1984.
otary Public in and for
Travis County, Texas
Kathleen B. Howell
(Type or Print NameT
My Commission Expires:
October 31, 1988
5
E
Vow City of Beaumont
' Council Agenda Item
�1:17711174101NIJMIL
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 25, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider renewal of an office space lease agreement for the
Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends the three-year renewal of a lease agreement for office and warehouse
space for the Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force (ATTF) at a monthly rental fee of$1,670.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the ATTF is to detect stolen vehicles and related items. Officers investigate
automobile theft rings and inspect salvage yards, used car lots, and automotive repair shops to
check for stolen vehicles, motors and other parts. The Task Force consists of seven employees
of the Beaumont Police Department, and one officer each from Pt. Arthur, Jefferson County, and
Hardin County. Of the seven Beaumont officers, three are detectives from the Criminal
Investigation Division. Those three are now considered part of the Task Force and also benefit
from the use of the building. Funding for the program is provided by a grant from the Texas Auto
Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA).
The lease area is approximately 3,900 square feet located at 2430 West Cardinal Drive, Suite C,
and owned by Bar C Ranch Company, Bill Wilson, President. The space has been leased by the
ATTF since 1993. The monthly rental has been $1,670 since 2002.
The ATTF is very satisfied with the location and wishes to extend the agreement to retain use of
the facility. The current lease agreement expires on September 30, 2005. All provisions of the
lease remain the same as the prior agreement. ATTF is responsible for the cost of all utilities for
i
Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force Lease Agreement Renewal
August 25, 2005
Page 2
the lease area. Hazard insurance, taxes and dumpster services are provided by the owner. The
City may terminate this lease without penalty by giving three (3) months written notice.
Attached for your review is a copy of the lease agreement in its substantial form.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The total estimated expenditure is $20,040 per year for the three (3) year contract period. Funds
are reimbursed to the City through the ATPA Grant.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Internal Services Director, and Police Chief.
C:\DOC---Scul"0W1m 11M,D ume111P0 11Leau--Theft Tcek F 111411 C RaMhUUb Thch-Bar C 1ll05 LuuUYCMc Ibm-LCCU EAI.ATTP-MI,111
L
LEASE AGREEMENT
This is a Lease Agreement made and entered into this day of , 2005 by and
between Bar C Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation, herein referred to as "LANDLORD" and
City of Beaumont/Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force,herein referred to as "TENANT."
ARTICLE I
Section 1.01 Lease Premises
(a) Landlord hereby leases and demises to the Tenant, and the Tenant hereby takes and leases
from the Landlord,subj ect to the terms and conditions hereof,warehouse and office space consisting
of approximately Three Thousand Nine Hundred(3,900)square feet located at 2430 West Cardinal
Drive, Suite C, as shown on the plat attached as Exhibit "A" (herein referred to as the "Leased
Premises" or the "Demised Premises").
(b) During the term of this Lease the Tenant shall have the non-exclusive right to use with others
the parking area and access driveways serving the building in which the Leased Premises are
situated,subject to the Landlord's right to impose reasonable limitations for the purpose of assuring
equitable use by all occupants and their invitees.
Section 1.02 Term
(a) The primary term of this Lease shall be 36 calendar months, plus the partial month, if any,
after the commencement of the Lease term.
(b) The Tenant may terminate this Lease at any time by giving at least three (3)months notice
in writing to the Landlord and no rental shall accrue after the effective date of termination.
(c) This Lease shall be automatically renewed from year to year without further notice unless
and until the Tenant shall give notice of termination in accordance with subparagraph (b) above;
provided that adequate appropriations are available from year to year for payment of rentals, and
provided further that this Lease shall in no event extend beyond September 30, 2008.
(d) The term of this Lease and the Tenant's obligation to pay rent hereunder shall commence on
October 1, 2005.
ARTICLE II
Section 2.01 Rent
During the term of this Lease, the Tenant agrees to pay to the Landlord annual rent in the
amount of Twenty Thousand Forty Dollars($20,040.00)payable in monthly installments of Sixteen
Hundred Seventy Dollars ($1,670.00) each. The first installment shall be payable on the
commencement date of this Lease and on the first day of each month thereafter. Rental shall be
payable at the Landlord's office,2615 Calder,Suite 1050,Beaumont,Texas 77702,or at such other
Page 1 of 9
place in Beaumont, Texas, as the Landlord may direct by written notice to the Tenant.
Section 2.02 Taxes, Insurance and Maintenance
(a) Landlord is responsible for all taxes and similar assessments against the land and the building
of which the Leased Premises are a part; and premiums applicable to hazard insurance covering the
building of which the Leased Premises are a part of; and charges for dumpster serving the Leased
Premises.
(b) The interior of the Leased Premises,including but not limited to air conditioning filters,shall
be maintained under normal conditions at the sole cost and expense of the Tenant and kept by the
Tenant in good working condition throughout the term of the Lease. Landlord shall have the right
to enter upon the Leased Premises at reasonable times during business hours for the purpose of
inspecting the premises in order to determine that maintenance is being properly performed.
(c) The foundation,exterior walls,air conditioning equipment and roof of the building in which
the Leased Premises are situated shall be maintained by the Landlord, except for damage thereto
resulting from acts or negligence of the Tenant or Tenant's agents or invitees.
Section 2.03 Utilities at Tenant's Cost
Tenant shall be solely responsible for and promptly pay all charges for heat,water, gas, electricity,
telephone service or sewerage service or any other utility used or consumed in the Leased Premises.
Section 2.04 Landlord Not Responsible for Utilities
In no event shall Landlord be liable for an interruption or failure in the supply of any such utility
services to the Leased Premises to the extent said interruption or failure is not directly attributable
to the negligence of the Landlord.
Section 2.05 Taxes on Personal Property
The Tenant shall be responsible for and shall pay before delinquency all taxes assessed during the
term of this Lease against any leasehold interest or personal property of any kind, owned by or
placed in, upon or about the Leased Premises by the Tenant.
ARTICLE III
Section 3.01 Use of Premises
The Tenant shall use the Leased Premises solely for the purpose of conducting the business of the
detection and administration of stolen vehicles and related items and all related uses,but for no other
purpose or purposes,without first obtaining the written consent of Landlord. Tenant shall promptly
and continuously comply with all laws, orders and regulations of the State, County and City
affecting the use, occupation, safety and cleanliness of the premises and the equipment of Tenant.
Tenant further agrees that during the entire term of this Lease it will remain open for business in a
normal and ordinary fashion, during usual and normal business hours,without interruption, except
during such time as an interruption may be caused by virtue of damages to the premises. No capital
improvement costs are considered to be a part of this Lease Agreement unless specifically agreed
Page 2 of 9
to in writing.
Section 3.02 Assigning and Subletting
Tenant shall not assign this Lease or sublet the Leased Premises or any part thereof without first
obtaining the written consent of Landlord;and,if Landlord's consent is obtained,such consent shall
not relieve Tenant of its obligations hereunder.
ARTICLE IV
Section 4.01 Loss and Damage
Landlord shall not be liable for any damage to property of Tenant or others located on the Leased
Premises,nor for the loss of or damage to any property of Tenant or of others by theft of others. All
property of Tenant kept or stored on the Leased Premises shall be so kept or stored at the risk of the
Tenant only. Landlord shall not be liable for any injury to persons resulting from any occurrence
in, on, or arising out of the Leased Premises,unless caused by the acts of negligence of Landlord,
its agents, employees or subcontractors.
Section 4.02 Legal Fees
The prevailing party shall also pay all costs, expense and reasonable attorney's fees that may be
incurred or paid by Landlord in successfully enforcing the covenants and agreements in this Lease.
Section 4.03 Liability Insurance
Tenant is self-insured as to all liability and maintains an adequate self-insurance fund to pay such
claims. As to liability claims resulting from the negligence of Tenant,Tenant will pay such claims
and protect Landlord from such claims.
ARTICLE V
Section 5.01 Notices of Damages
In the event the Leased Premises shall be damaged by fire, explosion, or any other type casualty,
Tenant shall immediately give notice thereof to the Landlord.
Section 5.02 Damage From Insured Hazard
If the damage is the result of a hazard covered by insurance, then the Landlord shall repair any
damage restoring the Leased Premises,whereupon the Landlord shall be entitled to retain all hazard
insurance. If the damage is caused by a non-insured hazard during the term of this Lease,then the
Landlord shall have the election of terminating the Lease, or of repairing the damage, whereupon
the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. During such time as the Leased Premises are
untenantable by virtue of damage, rent shall be abated.
Section 5.03 Total Condemnation
If the whole of the Leased Premises shall be acquired or condemned by eminent domain, then the
term of this Lease shall cease and terminate as of the date that title shall be divested of the Landlord,
and all rentals (including taxes and insurance) shall be paid to that date, and Tenant shall have no
Page 3 of 9
claim against the Landlord for the value of any unexpired term of this Lease.
Section 5.04 Partial Condemnation
If any part of the Leased Premises shall be acquired or condemned by eminent domain for any public
or quasi-public use or purpose,and in the event that such partial taking or condemnation shall render
the Leased Premises unsuitable for the business of the Tenant,then the term of this Lease shall cease
and terminate as of the date of title vesting in such proceeding, and Tenant shall have no claim
against Landlord for the value of any unexpired term of this Lease. In the event of a partial taking
or condemnation which is not extensive enough to render the premises unsuitable for the business
of the Tenant,then Landlord may, at its option,promptly make all necessary repairs and alterations
necessary to put that portion of the Leased Premises in a condition comparable to its condition at
the time of such condemnation less the portion lost in the taking, and in which event the terms and
conditions of this Lease shall continue in full force and effect, except for adjustments to the rental
reflecting actual changes in square footage of the premises.
Section 5.05 Damages
In the event of any condemnation or taking by eminent domain as herein before provided,whether
whole or partial, the Tenant hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any part thereof.
Although all damages in the event of any condemnation are to belong to the Landlord,whether such
damages are awarded as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the
Leased Premises, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover from the condemning authority,
but not the Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Tenant
in Tenant's own right, on account of any and all damage to Tenant's business by reason of the
condemnation,and for or on account of,any cost or loss to which Tenant might be put in removing
Tenant's merchandise, furniture, fixtures, leasehold improvements and equipment.
ARTICLE VI
Section 6.01 Quiet Enjoyment
Upon payment by the Tenant of the rents herein provided,and upon the observance and performance
of all covenants,terms and conditions on Tenant's part to be observed and performed,Tenant shall
peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy the Leased Premises for the term hereby demised without
hindrance or interruption by Landlord or any other person or persons lawfully or equitably claiming
by,through or under the Landlord, subject,nevertheless, to the terms and conditions of this Lease.
Section 6.02 Holding Over
In the event Tenant remains in possession of the Leased Premises after the expiration of this Lease
and without the execution of a new lease,it shall be deemed to be occupying said premises as tenant
from month-to-month at a rental equal to the rental herein provided and otherwise subject to all the
conditions,provisions and obligations of this Lease insofar as the same are applicable to a month-to-
month tenancy, subject to Landlord's right to increase rental as provided under the provisions of
Texas law applicable to a month-to-month tenancy.
Page 4 of 9
Section 6.03 Alterations, etc., by Tenant
Tenant shall not make any structural alterations,additions or improvements to the Leased Premises
without the prior written consent of Landlord, except the installation of unattached movable trade
fixtures which may be made or installed without drilling, cutting or otherwise defacing the Leased
Premises. All permanent alterations,additions, improvements and fixtures(other than unattached,
movable trade fixtures) which may be made or installed by either party hereto upon the Leased
Premises, shall remain upon and be surrendered with the premises and become the property of
Landlord at the termination of this Lease. Tenant shall have the right to install,at its own expense,
a sign or signs at the Leased Premises,subject to Landlord's approval as to size,design and general
decor. Any sign shall be the property of the Tenant and must be removed at the end of the tenancy.
Section 6.04 Surrender of Premises
At the expiration of the tenancy herein created, Tenant shall surrender the Leased Premises in the
same condition as the Leased Premises were in upon delivery of possession and completion of
Landlord's construction under this Lease, ordinary wear and tear and damage from the elements
excepted. The foregoing sentence shall be inapplicable to a termination occurring by virtue of
provisions of sections 6.01 or 5.02 hereof. If requested by Landlord, Tenant shall remove all its
trade fixtures,and any non-permanent alterations or improvements before surrendering the Leased
Premises, and shall repair any damage to the Leased Premises caused thereby. Tenant's obligation
to observe or perform this covenant shall survive the expiration or other termination of the term of
this Lease.
ARTICLE VII
Section 7.01 Offset Statement
Within ten days after request therefor by Landlord, or upon any sale, assignment or hypothecation
of the Leased Premises by Landlord, if an offset statement shall be required from Tenant, Tenant
agrees to deliver in recordable form a certificate to any proposed mortgagee or purchaser, or to
Landlord, certifying(if such be the case)that this Lease is in full force and effect and that there are
no defenses or offsets thereto, or stating those claimed by Tenant.
Section 7.02 Attornment
Tenant shall, in the event any proceedings are brought for the foreclosure of, or in the event of
exercise of the power of sale under any mortgage made by the Landlord covering the Leased
Premises, attorn to the purchaser upon any such foreclosure or sale and recognize such purchaser
as the Landlord under this Lease.
Section 7.03 Subordination
It is agreed that the right and interest of Tenant under this Lease shall be subject and subordinate to
any mortgages or deeds of trust that may hereafter be placed upon the Leased Premises, and to any
and all advances to be made thereunder,and to the interest thereon,and all renewals,modifications,
replacements and extensions thereof, if the mortgage or trustee named in said mortgages or deeds
of trust shall elect by written notice delivered to Tenant to subject and subordinate the right and
interest of the Tenant under this Lease to the lien of its mortgage or deed of trust and shall agree to
Page 5 of 9
recognize this Lease of Tenant in the event of foreclosure if Tenant is not in default; but any
mortgage or trustee may elect to give the rights and interest of the Tenant under this Lease priority
over the lien of its mortgage or deed of trust. In the event of either such election, and upon
notification by such mortgagee or trustee to Tenant to that effect, the rights and interest of the
Tenant under this Lease shall be deemed to be subordinate to, or to have priority over, as the case
may be,the lien of said mortgage or deed of trust,whether this Lease is dated prior to or subsequent
to the date of said mortgage or deed of trust. Tenant shall execute and deliver whatever instruments
may be required for such purposes,and in the event Tenant fails to do so within ten(10) days after
demand in writing, Tenant does hereby make, constitute and irrevocably appoint Landlord as its
attorney in fact and in its name, place and stead to do so.
Section 7.04 Short Form Lease
Landlord and Tenant each agree that at the request of either they will,following the commencement
of the term of this Lease, execute and deliver a recordable short-form lease containing the basic
provisions of this Lease, acknowledging that Tenant has accepted possession and this Lease is
operative, and reciting the exact commencement date and termination date of this Lease.
ARTICLE VIII
Section 8.01 Waste or Nuisance
Tenant shall not commit or suffer to be committed any waste upon the Leased Premises or any
nuisance or other act or thing which may disturb the quiet enjoyment of any other tenant of Landlord
in the proximity of the Leased Premises.
Section 8.02 Governmental Regulations
Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense,comply with all requirements and regulations of all
county, municipal, state, federal and other applicable governmental authorities, now in force or
which may hereafter be in force to the extent that the conditions of this Lease are not changed,
pertaining to the said premises, and shall faithfully observe in the use of the premises all municipal
and county ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which may hereafter be in force.
ARTICLE IX
Section 9.01 Acts of Default
Any of the following shall constitute an event of default by the Tenant:
(a) Failure of Tenant to pay all rental and other charges due hereunder within 15 days after same
shall become due; or
(b) Failure by Tenant to perform any of the other terms,conditions,covenants or obligations of
Tenant under this Lease, if such failure shall continue for more than 30 days after written notice
thereof shall have been given by the Landlord to the Tenant;provided,however,that if each failure
cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, Tenant shall not be in default if Tenant
commences to cure such failure within the thirty(30)day period and in good faith continues to cure
Page 6 of 9
each failure; or
(c) The Tenant becoming bankrupt or insolvent,or filing any debtor proceedings,or seeking any
type of debtor relief,or the filing against the Tenant in any court pursuant to any statute either of the
United States or of any other state a petition in bankruptcy or insolvency or for an arrangement or
for the appointment of a receiver or trustee for all or a portion of Tenant's property, or Tenant
making an assignment for the benefit of creditors,or petitioning for or entering into an arrangement
with respect to its creditors; or
(d) Abandonment of the Leased Premises by the Tenant; or
(e) Any act or omission by the Tenant which creates or purports to create a lien upon the Leased
Premises.
Nothing herein shall preclude Tenant's right to seek an equitable recovery for any default by
Landlord of any provisions of this Lease.
Section 9.02 Landlord's Remedies
(a) Upon a default by Tenant,the Landlord shall have the right to re-enter and take possession
of the Leased Premises. Should Landlord elect to re-enter, as herein provided, or should it take
possession pursuant to legal proceedings or pursuant to any notice provided for by law,it may either
terminate this Lease or it may from time to time without terminating this Lease, make such
alterations and repairs as may be necessary in order to re-let the premises, and re-let said premises
or any part thereof for such term or terms (which may be for a term extending beyond the term of
this Lease) and at such rental or rentals and upon such other terms and conditions as Landlord in its
sole discretion may deem advisable; upon each such re-letting the rentals shall be applied, first, to
the payment of any indebtedness other than rent due hereunder from Tenant to Landlord; second,
to the payment of any costs and expenses of such re-letting,including brokerage fees and attorney's
fees and costs of such alterations and repairs;third,to the payment of rent due and unpaid hereunder,
and the residue,if any, shall be held by Landlord and applied in payment of future rent as the same
may become due and payable hereunder. If such rentals received from such re-letting during any
month be less than that to be paid during the month by Tenant hereunder,Tenant shall pay any such
deficiency to Landlord. Such deficiency shall be calculated and paid monthly. No such re-entry or
taking possession of said premises by Landlord shall be construed as an election on its part to
terminate this Lease unless the termination thereof be decreed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(b) Notwithstanding any such re-letting without termination,Landlord may at any time thereafter
elect to terminate this Lease for such previous breach,in addition to any other remedies it may have,
and it may recover from Tenant all damages it may incur by reason of such breach, including the
cost of recovering the Leased Premises, reasonable attorney's fees, and including the worth at the
time of such termination of the excess, if any, of the amount of rent and charges equivalent to rent
reserved in this Lease for the remainder of the stated term over the then reasonable rental value of
the Leased Premises for the remainder of the stated term,all of which amounts shall be immediately
due and payable from Tenant to Landlord.
Page 7 of 9
Section 9.03 Additional Remedies
In case suit shall be brought for recovery of possession of the Leased Premises, for the recovery of
rent or any other amount due under the provisions of this Lease, or because of the breach of any
other covenant herein contained on the part of Tenant to be kept or performed, and a breach shall
be established, Tenant shall pay to Landlord all expenses incurred therefor, including a reasonable
attorney's fee. Any and all actions as may be brought under this Lease shall be brought in Jefferson
County, Texas.
ARTICLE X
Section 10.01 Waiver
One or more waivers of any covenant, term or condition of this Lease by either party shall not be
construed as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same covenant,term or condition. The consent
or approval by either party to,or any act by the other party requiring such consent or approval,shall
not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary consent to,or approval of,any subsequent similar act.
Waiver by Landlord of any covenant, term or condition of leases with other tenants of the Leased
Premises, or failure of Landlord to require of any other tenant of the Leased Premises to undertake
or perform obligations hereunder or other similar obligations,shall not be deemed a waiver or failure
as to any other person or party.
Section 10.02 Accord and Satisfaction
No payment by Tenant or receipt by Landlord or a lesser amount than the rent herein stipulated shall
be deemed to be other than on account of the earliest stipulated rent, nor shall any endorsement or
statement on any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment as rent be deemed an
accord and satisfaction, and Landlord may accept such check or payment without prejudice to
Landlord's right to recover the balance of such rent or pursue any other remedy provided in this
Lease.
Section 10.03 Notice
Any written notice under this Lease shall be by certified or registered prepaid mail or delivered in
person and,
(a) if intended for the Landlord,addressed or delivered to Landlord at 2615 Calder, Suite 1050,
Beaumont, Texas 77702, or at some other address in the U.S.A. as Landlord may designate by
written notice; and
(b) if intended for the Tenant, addressed or delivered to Tenant at the City of Beaumont, P. O.
Box 3827,Beaumont,Texas 77704,or at some other address in the U.S.A. as Tenant may designate
by written notice.
Section 10.04 Landlord's Successors-in-Interest
This provision of this Lease shall inure to the benefit of the Landlord and its assigns and shall be
binding upon the Tenant and its assigns; and the provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon
the Landlord only with respect to breaches occurring during the period of ownership of the Leased
Page 8 of 9
Premises by the Landlord and upon the successors-in-interest of the Landlord only during the period
of ownership by such successors-in-interest of the Landlord.
ARTICLE XI
Section 11.01 Miscellaneous Provisions
This Lease shall be of no force and effect until duly executed by authorized representatives of both
parties and delivered in fully executed form to each party.
Tenant shall store and promptly and property dispose of any waste oil, antifreeze or gasolines in an
environmentally safe manner and shall not cause any pollution or nuisance about the premises.
ARTICLE XII
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Lease to the contrary, in the event no funds or
insufficient funds are appropriated and budgeted or are otherwise unavailable by any means
whatsoever in any fiscal period for lease payments due under this Lease, Tenant will immediately
notify Landlord in writing of such occurrence and this Lease shall terminate on the last day of the
fiscal period for which appropriations have been received or made without penalty or expense to
Tenant.
EXECUTED in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.
LANDLORD: TENANT:
Bar C Ranch Company City of Beaumont /
Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force
By: BY:
W. E. Wilson, Jr., President Kyle Hayes, City Manager
Page 9 of 9
VO%w Cit of Beaumont
� lei y
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 22, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a ten foot
(10) wide water line easement providing access for fire prevention
services.
RECOMMENDATION
Kohl's Texas, L. P., a Texas limited partnership, has agreed to convey a ten foot(10')water line
easement to the City of Beaumont. This easement will provide mandatory access for fire
prevention services for the new Kohl's Department Store located on Muela Creek Drive and
described as being 0.5395 acres out of W. B. Dyches Survey, Abstract 17.
Administration recommends acceptance of the easement.
BACKGROUND
The easement is to be used to provide access to the water lines and fire hydrants for the property
named above. It would also allow for the construction, alteration, operation and maintenance of
the said water lines and appurtenances.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Public Works Director.
engfire_kohls-ib.wpd
22 August 2005
EXHIBIT A
NOW OR FORMERLY
Ems,M,AR PHEL PHELAN i1, ACRES
TRUSTEE
CT N0. 2 CFg 9847769 OPRJCT I
PROPOSED MUEE CREEK DRIVE N 86'58 07 E 10,00'
OUT OF A CALLED 34 849 ACRE TRACT PROPOSED MUEl�4 CREEK DRIVE " SET CAPPED
SET CAPPED M A PHELAN, II, TRUSTEE (WIDTH VARIES) 1/2";OO
ET ROD DESCRIBED AS TRACT N0. 2 1
TRACT N0. 2 CF/ 9847769 OPRJCT N 86.58'07" E 671.55'
7.96'
60.00'Z
N
N 86'58'07" E 10.00' a
w
9 �$
m Og
W O c o
Ul
p NOW OR FORMERLY
Ic 8.370 ACRE TRACT
N'o rri SURVEYED OCTOBER 26, 2004 :F-
rn BY 13ARROW SURVEYING w
OUT OF A CALLED 34.849 ACRE TRACT
?P. M.A. PHELAN, 11, TRUSTEE
o DESCRIBED AS TRACT NO. 2 V `�
•O0 CFf 9847769
OPRJCT '
Z 0.5395 ACRES o
0 0 23501.09 S.F.
N
°w
b
O t o
O A Z7
• N 86'59'08" E 583.57' ' '
w `Oa S 86'59'08" W 164,69'
S 86'59'08" W 398.88'
mc�
Q a o L N
ii 2 W h
rn cn rn p cn N p. Q) V
V
G' S 86'5651" W 5.00'
g q•o
FND CAPPED oi
IRON ROD
co w
o �� FND 112"
V F4 IRON ROD
No
p
O
6.83'
FND CAPPED
FND CAPPED. S 86'58'07" W 435.90' IRON ROD
IRON ROD (S 86'58'.07" W 435.89')
S 8658'07" W
NOW OR FORMERLY (Basis of Bearings) 10.00'
5.611 ACRE TRACT NOW OR FORMERLY
SURVEYED JULY 27, 2004 TEXACO P.A.W. EMPLOYEES
BY WORTECH LAND SURVEYORS, INC. FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
OUT OF A CALLED 34.849 ACRE TRACT CALLED 2.2354 ACRES
M.A. PHELAN, 8, TRUSTEE TRACT TWO
DESCRIBED AS TRACT NO. 2 CF/fl 2002014968
REVISED 6/13/05 Cri 9847769 O
OPRJCT PRJCT
N Survey Prepared Dr.. NOTES: W
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF A PJ,AT SHOWING
5.611 ACRE TRACT SURVEYED BY WORTECH LAND SURVEYORS 1
BARROW SURVEYING TRACT JULY 27, 2004, TR4 OUT OF A CALLED IN C ACRE PROPOSED
yy TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT N0. 2 OF RECORD IN CLERK'S
P.O. DRAWER 88 JEFFERSON RS 9847769 COUNT, THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WATER LINE EASEMENT
NEWTON, TX 75988 JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS, HAVING BEEN CALLED
(409) 379-2265 S 86'58'07"W.
S OUT OF THE
OR aY: O CK BY: SHE r: &� WESLEY DYCHES LEAGUE
VER: ACRD 2004 SCALE: SHEET NO: REV,
i
DATE: 1-21-05 1"=100' 1 of 1 1 �saQLrie�io�a9zai °al e. �,,.< ARSTRAC',T Nn. 17
� 1
August 30, 2005
Consider adoption of an Interim Order Ordinance seeking to have CenterPoint Energy comply
with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate notice of its proposed increase
and to base its request upon the proper test year as defined by the Gas Utility Regulatory Act
City of Beaumont
tlE Council A enda Item
� c g
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Tyrone Cooper, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 26, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider adoption of an Interim Order Ordinance seeking
to have CenterPoint Energy comply with state law in its rate
increase request by providing adequate notice of its proposed
increase and to base its request upon the proper test year as defined
by the Gas Utility Regulatory Act.
RECOMMENDATION
The administration recommends approval of an ordinance issuing an Interim Order seeking to
have CenterPoint Energy comply with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate
notice of its proposed increase and to base its request upon the proper test year.
BACKGROUND
On June 30, 2005 CenterPoint filed a statement of intent requesting that new rates be adopted in
its Beaumont/East Texas and South Texas Divisions. The request was based upon a test year
ending March 31, 2004. The historic test year relied upon by CenterPoint is stale and out of date.
CenterPoint published notice that it had filed the rate request but the notice was defective in all
cities with the exception of Longview. This ordinance is an Interim Order seeking to have
CenterPoint comply with the requirements of state law.
Texas law requires that conspicuous notice be given. No notice of the increase in rates for typical
residential and commercial customers was given in our area. No notice was provided of the
proposed increase in service charges. This ordinance requires notice of these changes in rates be
published. Without such notice cities are without jurisdiction to make final decisions in
CenterPoint's rate request.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY -2- AGENDA ITEM FOR AUGUST 30, 2005.
CenterPoint must base its rate request upon a historic test year, adjusted for known and
measurable charges. The last day of the test year must occur on the last day of the quarter of the
year for which the most current 12 months of data is readily available. The test year relied upon
by CenterPoint in its request ended on March 31, 2004. This test year is stale. The proposed
ordinance requires CenterPoint to base its request on 12 months of data ending on March 31,
2005.
The ordinance requires CenterPoint to provide written notice to the City Manager by September
7, 2005 when it expects to comply with this ordinance. Adoption of this Interim Order is
recommended.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
Cities are entitled to rate assistance and cost reimbursement of their reasonable rate case expenses
for participating in/or conducting a rate-making proceeding. It is expected that the City of
Beaumont will be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in this rate matter.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Resolution No. 05-160 suspending the effective date for the proposed rate increase of CenterPoint
Energy for ninety (90) days.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
Future consideration of rate increase request.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE AN INTERIM ORDER OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS TO REQUIRE
CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF ITS
CHANGES IN RATES FOR A TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER AND
ATYPICAL COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER AND THE CHANGES IN SERVICE
CHARGES IN A CONSPICUOUS MANNER;TO REQUIRE CENTERPOINT
TO REFILE ITS STATEMENT OF INTENT UTILIZING A CURRENT
HISTORIC TEST YEAR, ENDING MARCH 31, 2005 AND TO REQUIRE
CENTERPOINT TO CONTACT THE CITY MANAGER ON THE DATE
WHEN IT INTENDS TO REFILE ITS STATEMENT OF INTENT USING A
CURRENT TEST YEAR AND WHEN CENTERPOINT INTENDS TO
PUBLISH NOTICE CONSISTENTWITH THIS ORDINANCE; FINDINGAND
DETERMINING THATTHE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS
PASSED WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
TEXAS OPEN MEETINGSACT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS RELATEDTO
CENTERPOINT'S STATEMENT OF INTENT; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2005, CenterPoint Energy Entex ("CenterPoint") filed a
Statement of Intent on behalf of its Beaumont/East Texas Division to increase rates within
the municipal boundaries of the City of Beaumont; and,
WHEREAS, CenterPoint has failed to publish notice to indicate what the percentage
increase is for a typical residential and a typical commercial customer that is being
requested by CenterPoint within the City of Beaumont; and,
WHEREAS, CenterPoint has failed to publish notice to indicate what the current
service charges are that it is seeking to increase and what the proposed service charges
are if its request is granted within the City of Beaumont; and,
i
WHEREAS, the requirement to provide adequate and timely notice is fundamental
to the City being able to take jurisdiction over the request to increase rates by CenterPoint;
and,
WHEREAS,the CenterPoint ratepayers are entitled to adequate public notice before
any increases in rates are put into effect; and,
WHEREAS, the historic test year utilized by CenterPoint in its rate filing ended on
March 31, 2004; and,
WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act requires that CenterPoint's filing be
based upon a test year which contains the most recent 12 months, beginning on the first
day of a calendar or fiscal year quarter, for which operating data for a gas utility are
available; and,
WHEREAS, it is typical in filings before municipalities that the end of the test year
not occur more than six to seven months prior to the filing of the Statement of Intent relied
upon by CenterPoint with the City Secretary, and,
WHEREAS,the test year utilized in its rate filing with the cities in the Beaumont/East
Texas Division is stale and not in compliance with state law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
SECTION 1. INTERIM ORDER
That this ordinance should be regarded as an interim order and shall remain in full
force and effect until a final decision is adopted by the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, Texas on CenterPoint's request to change rates.
SECTION 2. HISTORIC TEST YEAR DATA
CenterPoint shall refile its Statement of Intent using a March 31, 2005 ending test
year. CenterPoint is also ordered to notify City Manager in writing no later than September
7, 2005, by what date it will be able to refile its Statement of Intent with the new test year.
SECTION 3. PUBLIC NOTICE
CenterPoint shall publish notice for four consecutive weeks in conspicuous form in
the City of Beaumont. CenterPoint shall publish the body of the notice in at least 12 point
type. The heading for the Notice shall be in at least 16 point type, entitled "Notice of Gas
Rate Increase." The published notice shall contain information about the requested
change in rates within the City of Beaumont, as follows:
a) The dollar and cents amount and percentage change in base rates (without
the cost of gas) for a typical residential customer (6 mcf).
b) The dollar and cents about and percentage change in base rates(without the
cost of gas) for a typical commercial customer (30 mcf).
C) For each service charge that CenterPoint seeks to change provide the
current charge and the proposed charge.
CenterPoint is ordered to notify the City Manager in writing no later than September
7, 2005 if it intends to comply with the publication of notice requirements set forth in this
section.
SECTION 4. CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance is cumulative of all other requirements for notice under state law and
shall become effective upon passage and publication as required by law.
SECTION 5. PASSED AT OPEN MEETING
That the meeting at which this Ordinance was passed was conducted in strict
compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act (Texas Government Code Chapter 551).
SECTION 6. NOTICE TO CENTERPOINT
A copy of this Ordinance shall be faxed to Mr. Chuck Harder, Executive Director of
Rates and Regulatory, CenterPoint Energy Entex at (713) 207-0046 within twenty-four
hours of the adoption of this Ordinance along with a copy by regular mail to Mr. Harder at
1111 Louisiana, Houston, Texas 77005.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of
August, 2005.
- Mayor Guy N. Goodson -
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney
• 2
August 30, 2005
Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Water Treatment
Plant 14 Million Gallons Per Day(MGD) Expansion and Miscellaneous Improvements Project
amount for"extra work"
•
•
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Hani J. Tohme, Water Utilities Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 22, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase
the Water Treatment Plant 14 Million Gallons Per Day(MGD) Expansion
and Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount for "extra work."
RECOMMENDATION
(Administration recommends approval of increasing the Water Treatment Plant 14 MGD Expansion and
Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount by$90,450.34 to dig and locate the leak on the existing 48 inch
water transmission line, install a light pole, install two 48 inch butterfly valves at the high service pump
station discharge connection,install water hose stations, pressure and caustic taps at the new filters. The
proposed extra work will represent 0.82 percent of the original contract amount. The total of all of the
extra work to date, including this proposed recommendation, will represent 15.83 percent of the original
contract amount.
BACKGROUND
�Jbe proposed additions and modifications to the original contract documents and design are due to
unforseen conditions prior to commencing construction and a water leak on an existing 48 inch water
transmission line. The changes will improve the future operation and increase the efficiency of the Water
Treatment Plant, and will help the City meet required State and Federal regulations.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
LFunds for the project are available in the Capital Improvement Funds.f
PREVIOUS ACTION
Resolution 03-271 in the amount of$11,029,000 was passed by City Council on December 16, 2003.
Resolution 04-143 in the amount of$1,377,912.01 was passed by City Council on June 29, 2004.
Resolution 05-003 in the amount of$28,475.60 was passed by City Council on January 4, 2005.
Resolution 05-130 in the amount of$249,396.54 was passed by City Council on May 24,2005.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, and Water Utilities Director.
APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE
Change Order No.4
Date:August 22,2005
Project: Water Treatment Plant 14 MGD Expansion
Owner. City of Beaumont
P.O.Box 3827
Beaumont,Texas 77704
Contractor: Craig,Sheffield and Austin.
2314 McAllister Road
Houston,TX 77092
To the Owner: Approval of Change Order No.4 is requested.
Reason for Change: To increase the contract amount performed by the Contractor:
To dig and locate the leak on the existing 48 inch water transmission line,install alight pole,install two 48
inch butterfly valves at the high service pump station discharge connection,install water hose stations,
pressure and caustic taps at the new filters.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $11.029.000.
CHANGE ORDER NO.4
Description Net Change
1.Exploratory Dig for 48"Line +$ 2.797.30
2.Install Light Pole +$ 534.60
3.48"Butterfly Valves at HSPS Discharge Connection +$60.069.29
4.Hose Stations at Filters +$20.964.50
5.Filter Wall Pressure Tap +$ 4.485.00
6.Addition of Caustic Taps in the New Filters +$ 1.599.65
Total Change Order No.4 +$90.450.34
TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $12.865.684.83.
CONDITION OF CHANGE:
"Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the adjustments in contract price and contract time stipulated in
this Change Order No.4 represent full compensation for all increases and decreases in cost of and time
required to perform the entire work under Contract arising directly or indirectly from this change order and
all previous change orders. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between Owner and
Contractor that the change order represents an all-inclusive, mutually agreed upon adjustment to the
Contract,and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this change order after it is properly
executed."
Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted by:
Hani Tohme,P.E. City of Beaumont Craig,Sheffield,and Austin
Water Utilities Director Owner Contractor
Date: Date: Date:
• 3
August 30, 2005
Consider approving a one year agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas for employee
medical and dental insurance
City of Beaumont
..! ease,
Council Agenda Item
� ` g
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Marie Dodson, Human Resources Manager
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a one year agreement with Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) for employee medical and dental
insurance.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends that council award to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) a
one year agreement with an optional annual renewal not to exceed a total of five (5) years. The
rates quoted for a twelve month period effective January 1, 2006 is for third party administration
of the City's self funded Preferred Provider Organization(PPO)medical plan, self funded dental
plan and a fully insured Health Maintenance Organization (HMO Blue Texas). The extension of
this agreement will be on a year-to-year basis to a maximum of five (5) years if it is determined
to be in the best interest of the City.
BACKGROUND
Full time city employees are offered medical and dental benefits. The medical and dental benefits
consist of a fully insured HMO plan, a self funded PPO plan and a self funded dental plan. There
are 544 participants enrolled in the HMO plan, 466 active employees and 78 retirees. There are
819 participants enrolled in the PPO plan, 713 active employees and 106 retirees. In the dental
plan, there are 921 active employees.
In June 2005, City staff began analyzing the City's health care costs. Staff also began working
with the City's health benefit consultant, McGriff, Siebels and Williams of Texas, Inc., to
request bid proposals for the City's HMO, PPO, and dental plans for 2006.
The City received only one bid which was from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, the incumbent
medical carrier. BCBSTX's proposed PPO renewal showed claims projection for 2006 as
essentially flat compared to 2005 claims. This projection resulted in a zero increase in the PPO
administration and stop loss fees for the 2006 plan year. BCBS increased the HMO premiums by
13%. This increase was a function of increasing claims utilization, rising trend factors and
increasing provider reimbursements.''
McGriff recommends that the City remain with BCBS because BCBS offers cost effective plans
with an extensive network and deep provider discounts. The projected medical rate increase is
within industry trend. Renewal rates for the self funded dental plan did not increase.
Staff recommends implementation of the following HMO and PPO rates January 1, 2006:
2005 Monthly HMO Rates 2006 Monthly HMO Rates
Employee Only $233.00 $263.76
Employee + 1 Dependent $561.51 $635.63
Employee + Family T 99.14 $904.63
2005 Monthly PPO Stop Loss 2006 Monthly PPO Stop Loss
and Administration Rates and Administration Rates
Employee Only $57.17 $57.17
Employee + 1 Dependent $77.88 $77.88
Employee + Family $77.88 $77.88
2005 Monthly Dental 2006 Monthly Dental
Administration Rates Administration Rates
Employee Only $5.66 $5.66
Employee + 1 Dependent $5.66 $5.66
Employee + Family $5.66 $5.66
Budgetary Impact
Appropriation of funds is available in the Employee Benefits Fund.
Previous Action
None.
Subsequent Action
None.
Recommended By
City Manager and Human Resources Director.
i
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Blue
Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) for a one-year contract with an optional annual
renewal not to exceed a total of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2006 to provide
third-party administration of the City's self-funded Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)
medical plan, self-funded dental plan and a fully-insured Health Maintenance Organization
(HMO) with HMO Blue Texas.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day
of August, 2005.
- Mayor Guy N. Goodson -
4
August 30, 2005
Consider approving a two-year contract with Aetna, Inc. for Basic Life and Accidental Death and
Dismemberment (AD&D), Supplemental Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment
(AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance
` O%
City of Beaumont
...A..UU9Council A enda Item
M c g
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Marie A. Dodson, Human Resources Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a two-year contract with Aetna, Inc. for
Basic Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D),
Supplemental Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment
(AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends that Council award a two-year contract effective January 1, 2006 to
Aetna,Inc.for Basic Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment(AD&D), Supplemental Life
and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance.
BACKGROUND
In July 2005,City staff began analyzing the City's life insurance cost. Staff also began working with
the City's benefit consultant,McGriff Siebels and Williams of Texas,Inc.to solicit proposals on the
City's behalf. McGriff received seven proposals and the incumbent's quote for basic life and
accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D), supplemental life and AD&D, and dependent life
insurance. The results of the top five proposals are attached for your review.
Currently the City provides basic life and accidental death and dismemberment(AD&D)insurance
for approximately 1204 employees. The City sponsored basic life and accidental death and
dismemberment insurance is provided at no cost to the employee. The amount of basic life/AD&D
insurance is 100% of the employee's annual base salary rounded to the next highest $1,000 to a
maximum benefit of$50,000. Employees may elect to purchase supplemental life and accidental
death and dismemberment and dependent life at a group rate. The group rate is usually more cost
effective than an individual policy for the employee.
i
Supplemental life, which includes AD&D and dependent life, is offered to all employees with
approximately 945 currently participating. This coverage has been provided through Prudential since
January 1,2004,however,it is recommended that the coverage be provided by Aetna,Inc.beginning
January 1,2006 due to a 71.43%proposed increase by Prudential. Aetna,Inc.will provide the same
level of coverage that is currently in effect)
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Appropriation of funds is available in the Employee Benefits Fund.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Human Resources Director.
S:\AGENDA\AGENDA ITEM MEMOS\LIFE06.wpd
PROPOSAL ANALYSIS FOR
BASIC LIFE/ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT
INCLUDING OPTIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE
Vendors Submitting Basic Life (per Accidental Supplemental Supplemental Dependent Estimated
Proposals emp/$1,000 Death & Dis. Life(per emp/ AD&D (per Life Annual City
coverage/mo) (per emp/ $1,000 emp/$1,000 (per unit/mo) Premium
$1,000 coverage/mo) coverage/mo)
coverage/mo)
Aetna, Inc. .11 .03 .17 .03 1.00 $74,231
Standard .15 .015 .18 .015 1.00 $87,486
Jefferson Pilot .17 .025 .20 .03 1.00 $103,393
Ft. Dearborn .19 .03 .234 .03 .94 $116,648
Cigna .21 .03 .17 .03 1.00 $127,253
5
August 30, 2005
Consider granting the City Manager authority to implement the contribution rate changes for
retirees in the medical plans
. City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
� c
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Marie A. Dodson, Human Resources Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: City Council consider granting the City Manager authority to
implement the contribution rate changes for retirees in the medical
plans.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends that Council approve medical contribution rate changes for retirees
including their dependents effective January 1, 2006.
BACKGROUND
Retirees and their dependents are allowed to elect continuation of medical coverage as provided
by state statute. The retiree/dependent may continue coverage until the retiree/dependent is
covered by Medicare/Medicaid but not beyond age 65. Currently, there are 186 retirees on the
City's medical plans.
The retiree contribution rate for Police and Fire retirees is based on a provision in the Police and
Fire contract agreements which states, "Any employee who retired on or after February 1, 1992
may be subject to an annual increase in contribution. The increase will be effected in accordance
with the labor agreement. The single rate will be established at 69%; single rate +1 at 58%; and
the family rate at 54% of the COBRA rate on January 1st annually." This same formula is utilized
when calculating the contribution rate for civilian retirees. As such, retiree rates effective January
1, 2006 based on each medical plan will be as follows:
L
i
Plan Medical Prescription 2006 2006 2005
and Rate Drug Rate COBRA Retiree Retiree
Category 2006 2006 Rate* Rate Rate
PPO (EO) $273.85 57.10 $330.95 $228.36 $227.57
(El) 677.80 141.35 819.15 475.11 470.77
(E2) 890.23 185.65 1,075.88 580.98 579.05
HMO (EO) 263.76 62.94 326.70 225.42 199.38
(E1) 635.63 151.70 787.33 456.65 403.32
(E2) 904.63 215.91 1,120.54 605.09 529.85
*Rate does not include BCBS administration fee.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Appropriation of funds is available in the Employee Benefits Fund.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Human Resources Director.
S:WGENDA\AGENDA ITEM MEMOS\retraate06.wpd 9/19/02
i
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to implement the contribution rate
changes as shown below for retirees including their dependents who are on the City's
medical and/or dental plans effective January 1, 2006.
Plan Medical Prescription 2005 2004 2005
and Rate Drug Rate COBRA Retiree Retiree
Category 2005 2005 Rate* Rate Rate
PPO (EO) $273.85 $55.96 $329.81 $227.57 $227.57
(E1) $677.80 $133.88 $811.68 $470.77 $470.77
(E2) $890.23 $182.08 $1,072.31 $579.05 $579.05
HMO (EO) $233.00 $55.96 $288.96 $190.28 $199.38
(E1) $561.51 $133.88 $695.39 $384.89 $403.32
(E2) $799.14 $182.08 $981.22 $505.43 $529.85
*Rate does not include BCBS administration fee.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day
of August, 2005.
- Mayor Guy N. Goodson -
6
August 30, 2005
Schedule a second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget and schedule the date of the
meeting at which the City Council will vote on the 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate
vow f:UU9 City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Max S. Duplant, Finance Officer
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 25, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Schedule a second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget
and schedule the date of the meeting at which the City Council will vote on the 2005 (FY 2006)
Proposed Tax Rate.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council schedule a second public hearing on September 6, 2005 at 1:30
p.m. in the Council Chambers related to the proposed FY 2006 Budget.
It is recommended that Council schedule the meeting to adopt the tax rate on September 20, 2005
at 1:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers
BACKGROUND
A public hearing is scheduled for August 30, 2005 to review the proposed FY 2006 Budget. This
hearing meets the requirements of the City Charter but not state law which requires the public
hearing to be held after the 15``' day after the date the proposed budget is filed with the City
Council. This will be a joint public hearing as the second required public hearing for the 2005
(FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate was previously scheduled for September 6, 2005.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The detail budget information for all funds was distributed to Council at the August 16, 2005
meeting and will be reviewed at a work session on August 30, 2005.
PREVIOUS ACTION aDo
Council scheduled a public hearing for August 30, 2005 to review the proposed FY D6 Budget.
On August 16, 2005, Council took a record vote to place the proposal to adopt the tax rate on the
agenda of a future meeting.
Council Agenda Item
Page 2
August 25, 2005
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
A second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget will be held on the date Council
schedules. If the appropriations increase, another public hearing must be held. The target date for
adoption of the FY 2006 Budget is September 20, 2005.
RECOMMENDED BY: City Manager and Finance Officer
! 7
August 30, 2005
PUBLIC HEARING: Receive comments on proposed FY 2006 Budget, proposed 2006 Capital
Program and 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate
C V~IE. ...JJ!--
City of Beaumont
ow-
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Max S. Duplant, Finance Officer
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 26, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Hold Joint Public Hearing on proposed FY 2006 Budget,
proposed 2006 Capital Program, and 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council hold a joint public hearing as scheduled on the proposed FY
2006 Budget, the proposed 2006 Capital Program, and the 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate
of$0.659. In accordance with the Property Tax Code, the Council must make the following
announcement: The meeting to vote on the tax rate will be held on September 20, 2005 at
1:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
BACKGROUND
The proposed FY 2006 Budget was submitted to Council on August 16, 2005 and the proposed
2006 Capital Program was submitted on May 10, 2005.
Chapter 26 of the Property Tax Code requires taxing units to comply with truth-in-taxation
laws in adopting their tax rate. A Notice of Public Hearing of Tax Increase was published
August 23, 2005 regarding the proposal to increase total tax revenue from properties on the
tax roll by 3.97%. This increase is related to the appraised value, as there is a proposed
decrease in the tax rate of$0.005. The percent change to the homeowner is dependent on their
taxable value.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The proposed FY 2006 Budget appropriation for all funds, net of contingency, totals
$172,310,399.
Council Agenda Item
August 25, 2005
Page 2
In the proposed 2006 Capital Program, projects in the construction phase total $76,908,000
and include $18,395,000 in Public Works projects, $7,200,000 in General Improvement
projects and $51,313,000 in Water and Sewer projects. Projects in the design phase total
$117,404,000 which includes $85,118,000 in Public Works projects, $7,220,000 in General
Improvement projects, and $25,066,000 in Water and Sewer projects. The total for planned
projects in all three areas is $123,635,000.
Applying the proposed tax rate of$0.659, and a 97% collection rate, budgeted revenues of
$19,439,000 and $11,969,000 respectively to the General and Debt Service Funds are
anticipated. The total rate of$0.659 is apportioned $0.407869 to the General Fund and
$0.251131 toward Debt Service.
PREVIOUS ACTION
As required by Article VI, Sections 2 and 4 of the City Charter, the proposed FY 2006 Budget
was submitted to Council on August 16, 2005, and as required by Sections 19 and 20, the
2006 Capital Program was submitted to Council on May 10, 2005. The notice of the public
hearing on the Budget and Capital Program was published August 23, 2005.
On August 16, 2005, City Council took a record vote to place the proposal to adopt a tax rate
of$0.659 on the agenda of a future meeting. The motion passed and two public hearings were
scheduled for August 30, 2005 and September 6, 2005. The Notice of Public Hearing on Tax
Increase was published August 23, 2005.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
The target date for adoption of the proposed FY 2006 Budget, the proposed 2006 Capital
Program, and the 2005 (FY2006) Proposed Tax Rate of$0.659 is September 20, 2005.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
r
THAT a public hearing to consider the FY 2006 proposed budget for the City of Beaumont
shall be held September 6, 2005, at 1:30 o'clock p.m. in the City Council Chambers, City
of Beaumont, Texas.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council will meet to adopt the tax rate on
September 20, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, City of Beaumont.
THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE
AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE; AND
THE TAX RATE WILL RAISE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND
OPERATIONS ON A $100,000 HOME BY APPROXIMATELY R XIMATELY $266.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of
August, 2005.
- Mayor Guy N. Goodson -
8
August 30, 2005
PUBLIC HEARING: Dilapidated Structures
Consider approval of an ordinance declaring certain structures to be dangerous structures and
ordering their removal within so many days
City of Beaumont
edema.
•�• Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005
AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider after public hearing to declare the following thirty-
four (34) structures to be dangerous structures and order the owners
to raze said structures within ten (10) days. If the property owner
fails to comply within ten(10)days, staff is requesting City Council
authorization to demolish these structures without further
notification to the property owner or City Council action.
1. 378 Alabama and Garage (1) 14. 985 Fulton Avenue
2. 1096 Alabama (Commercial) 15. 1650 Gill
3. 2485 Avenue H (Garage Apt.) (2) 16. 4225 Goliad (Commercial)
4. 4040 Blanch (1) 17. 1285 Isla (1)
5. 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) 18. 3275 Ledet Road (Garage)
6. 1560 College and Garage (1) 19. 1832 Liberty (Garage Apartment) (1)
7. 5645 Comstock Road (1) 20. 1430 Live Oak and Rear Metal Shed
8. 3090 Concord Road (Commercial) 21. 1750 Live Oak (Commercial)
9. 6715 Concord Road (Commercial) 22. 1045 Long (Garage)
10 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) 23. 1499 Madison (Garage)
11. 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) 24. 2797 Magnolia (Commercial)
12. 620 Edgemore Drive 25. 3360 Magnolia
13. 2370 Forrest (Garage) T26. 3406 Magnolia (Garage Apartment)
V) Indicates number of times structure has been enrolled in work program.
(Continued)
27. 3414 Magnolia 31. 2380 Pecan
28. 3492 Magnolia 32. 3125 Roberts (Garage)
29. 4565 N. Major Drive (1) 33. 4265 Sullivan
30. 2258 Pecan 34. 3099 Waverly
(#) Indicates number of times structure has been enrolled in work program.
RECOMMENDATION
That City Council condemn these thirty-four(34)structures and order owner to raze within ten(10)
days.
BACKGROUND
It has been determined that these structures meet the definition of a dangerous structure because
they have deteriorated such that they are no longer considered suitable for repair.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
City may incur the cost of demolition.
PREVIOUS ACTION
These structures have been inspected by the Building Codes Division and found to be dangerous
structures as defined by the City of Beaumont's Code of Ordinances, Article III, Dangerous
Structures, Section 14-50.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
Building Codes Division will demolish or cause to be demolished said structures.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and Building Official.
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE FINDING CERTAIN
STRUCTURES TO BE PUBLIC NUISANCES AND
ORDERING THEIR DEMOLITION AND/OR REPAIR;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
Section 1.
That the City Council of the City of Beaumont hereby finds and declares the
buildings located at:
1. 378 Alabama and Garage 18. 3275 Ledet Road (Garage)
2. 1096 Alabama (Commercial) 19. 1832 Liberty (Garage Apartment)
3. 2485 Avenue H (Garage Apt.) 20. 1430 Live Oak and Rear Metal Shed
4. 4040 Blanch 21. 1750 Live Oak (Commercial)
5. 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) 22. 1045 Long (Garage)
6. 1560 College and Garage 23. 1499 Madison (Garage)
7. 5645 Comstock Road 24. 2797 Magnolia (Commercial)
8. 3090 Concord Road (Commercial) 25. 3360 Magnolia
9. 6715 Concord Road (Commercial) 26. 3406 Magnolia (Garage Apartment)
10 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) 27. 3414 Magnolia
11. 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) 28. 3492 Magnolia
12. 620 Edgemore Drive 29. 4565 N. Major Drive
13. 2370 Forrest (Garage) 30. 2258 Pecan
14. 985 Fulton Avenue 31. 2380 Pecan
15. 1650 Gill 32. 3125 Roberts (Garage)
16. 4225 Goliad (Commercial) 33. 4265 Sullivan
17. 1285 Isla 34. 3099 Waverly
to be public nuisances in that said buildings violate Chapter 14, Section 14-50 of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Beaumont and are for want of repairs, or by reason of age or
dilapidated condition, likely to cause or promote fires that would endanger persons or
property.
Section 2.
In accordance with Article XVII, Section 2, of the Charter of the City of Beaumont,
Section 14-52 of the Code of Ordinances of Beaumont, Texas, it is hereby ordered that
the owner or owners of the following described buildings demolish and remove said
structures within ten (10) days of the effective date of this ordinance.
1. 378 Alabama and Garage 18. 3275 Ledet Road (Garage)
2. 1096 Alabama (Commercial) 19. 1832 Liberty (Garage Apartment)
3. 2485 Avenue H (Garage Apt.) 20. 1430 Live Oak and Rear Metal Shed
4. 4040 Blanch 21. 1750 Live Oak (Commercial)
5. 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) 22. 1045 Long (Garage)
6. 1560 College and Garage 23. 1499 Madison (Garage)
7. 5645 Comstock Road 24. 2797 Magnolia (Commercial)
8. 3090 Concord Road (Commercial) 25. 3360 Magnolia
9. 6715 Concord Road (Commercial) 26. 3406 Magnolia (Garage Apartment)
10 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) 27. 3414 Magnolia
11. 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) 28. 3492 Magnolia
12. 620 Edgemore Drive 29. 4565 N. Major Drive
13. 2370 Forrest (Garage) 30. 2258 Pecan
14. 985 Fulton Avenue 31. 2380 Pecan
15. 1650 Gill 32. 3125 Roberts (Garage)
16. 4225 Goliad (Commercial) 33. 4265 Sullivan
17. 1285 Isla 34. 3099 Waverly
Section 3.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the
application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances should for any reason
be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance, and to such end the various portions and provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be severable.
Section 4.
That any person who violated any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction,
be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of the Code of Ordinances of Beaumont, Texas.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of
August, 2005.
- Mayor Guy N. Goodson -
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAUMONT 1L.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE August 21, 2000 WARD 4
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 378 Alabama and Garage
OWNER Bryon L. & Dwana L. Lewis
ADDRESS 4390 Corley CITY/STATE (07)-4411
APPRAISAL VALUE
Land Value 3340
Improvement Value 14490
Total Value 17830
A. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
B. Thirty-three(33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO X
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES X NO 04/04/03 thru 08/04/03
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure is being occupied which is against city code for substandard
structures The tenant is Steve Andrus who told staff that he is buying the house from Bryon Lewis. The
,structure needs a new roof. There is water damage to the interior. The kitchen ceiling has missing sheetrock
and is covered with a tarp The exterior siding (O S B) is water damaged The right exterior side is
uncovered O S B Some of the exterior walls just have felt paper covering them The carport and rear garage
are collapsing The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. All
damaged electrical wirin! and electrical fixtures will need to meet code Also all damaged plumbing and
plumbic fixtures will need to meet code No electrical nor plumbing permits have been purchased Staff
spoke with the tenant,Mr. Andrus,the day of the inspection and told him that we would be sending him and
the owners a notice to appear before City Council Staff left a card with Mr.Andrus and asked him to have
Mr. Lewis call Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will
exceed over 50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
sAP-11
J ,
f
s
378 ALABAMA
V
� t g
7 � G
a
t ^
- r
-71-V *
w
x�
f�.
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEM NIONT 2.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE April 277, 20W; «ARD 4
:ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1096 Alabama avenue (Commercial)
ONN N E R Global New Millennium Partners LTD
,ADDRESS 6671 Southwest Fwv Ste 43�; CITY/STATE Houston, Texas 7707=1-2212
APPRAISAL VALt'E
Land Value 57611
Impro-ement Value 1696111
'total Value 173711
A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
B. Thirty-tlu-ec (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
( . Fire damaged.' YES X NO
D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program? YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal exterior of this building has been dammed by fire. The metal
roof has extensive damage There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All
damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There is broken Mass in the windows.
101he exterior doors need to be replaced The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need
to be repaired all dammed electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all
damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced No work has been done. The structure
is secure at present time Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these
repairs will exceed over 50`10 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
� kI
��Jdr
M
1096 ALABAMA
A
a
t
< i
iw
mr
A,
1
V
�a x
+►
*r
� A
� 1
r�.
'r
SYa r,-g
N
ol
•
a vA
w
.:s
FE
lot
x �
P
dpl t'
1 440
•
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ItiSPECTION REPORT
B( ILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEA1 N10NT 3'
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE September 9 2003 WARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2485 Avenue 11 (Garage Apartment)
O« N E R Melvin Minnard, Jr. ET UX
_ADDRESS 7000 Ebonv Ct CITY/STATE Plano, Texas 75024-2109
APPRAISAL VALUE
Land Value 2-500
InlproNanent Value 10510 (More than one structure)
Total Value 13010
1. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO
B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO_ x
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? VES x NO 10131103 thru 03/01/04
Est. 0410V05
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles appear a little worn Some fascia was changed but some is
,,till rotten The stairs have new handrails but the steps are deteriorated all damaged or rotten windows
and window sills will need to be replaced There are some new windows and there are a couple that still need
to be changed The screens are missing The garage doors are missing Some of the deteriorated exterior
siding has been changed The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired.
Ali damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing
and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced 9 building permit was bought 10131103. 'Vo electrical nor
t)lcuinhingpernrits there purchased Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact tliat
these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value stab' is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS
- � t
v k
e. '- yp•ra
1 IF+y
e _
icy►
F TAY"uV r 1. t-
R
w
°
° e "
4'
IM
I t
-
�
e ,_
r ' r
t
I�
41 .
r +
,fir¢ -
IOU
� a
r a
f
r
�t
'T 1
• , r n
r
7
u F
•
po�
I
- . OWN" \\~
i .
.
. y • �� >� �.�\.� }�� «
:\§� >
<< . . \
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAUMONT 4.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE January 28. 2003 NVARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4040 Blanch
ONN,NER Evelyn Bri as
ADDRESS 790 E. Gill CIT`1'/STATE (03)-3214
XPPRAISAL VALUE
Land Faille 1480
Improvement Value 2951)
Total t'alue 4430
A. Fifth (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO
B. Thil-0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damar,ed? YES NO X
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES X N0 02/11/03 thru 06/11/03
1'. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,628.22 PLUS COST OF JUDGEMENT.
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: There is water damage to the interior of the structure. The rear steps are
dammed All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior front
40door will need to be replaced There is extensive termite damage to the structure. There is extensive
deterioration to the foundation The sills are sitting on the ground in the front. The interior flooring,
ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired All damaged electrical wiring and electrical
fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced.
-1 huilding permit was purchaser! 3/11 103 fir 5500 00 No electrical nor plunthing permits were purchased.
Some repairs were started but there is still extensive repairs to be done The structure is open and accessible.
Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%o
of its appraised value staff is recommendinat raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
' F Grp
e .� .JFw t ,po- •,f& � ,��
� I
qY�
:
i F F W
� h
p
T.
wow-
1 I"1 F E
ji
M. �.✓ a #.'' x.'3.3
p.
t
r:
"" i"
t
Ys
y
i
t �
x �
i
b'
a
�u
F ..
I
a
PAX
-HP.
•
•
F
#gyp
r ,
i
•
tea,= a� • , � ,��, ��� � ��
:.,
=y.
Ag
IY.T
� � •� �; k �spa �. ,:
4F
Py $
F
t s ,� 1. `-. icc,
k
SUBSTANDARD BUILDI\G INSPLCTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
5'
CITY OF BEAC'INIONT
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Februan, 17, 2005 NVARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1438-44-46 College (Commercial)
OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt
ADDRFSS 375-5 Delaware Apt 4 CITY/STATE (06)-7936
i
APPRAISAL FACIE
Land Value 10780
Imprmement Value 16530
Total Value 27310
A. FiftN (III) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
t3. Thirtc-three (33) percent deterioration of supporti►►g members:' YES X NO
C. Fire dam ul,ed? YES NO \_
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program'' YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is deteriorated. The rafters and fascia
boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is water damage to the interior due to the condition
of the roof all damaged or• rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are
boarded but the window frames are rotted The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced.
There is termite damage to the structure The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need
to be repaired Some of the interior was viewed through the burglar bars on the front door. The siding is
deteriorated and missing allowing outside elements into attic The bottom plates and corner studs are rotten.
X11 damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing
urd plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property is overgrown Based on the extensive repairs
needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value, staff is
recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE AIJACIIED PHOTOS
4
R
W
• a F 4 r
-A
t
w
1438 COLLEGE
�y
I
x .
AU
NP .09,
a,.
w
s
w
1
! r
. '
d s
P� .y
i
x
F
9,
G�.
•
N k "
„�
I+
�F
X
.d+
n
r
r .
•
P•`Y
•
l
Mi
Y �
111 f�
1
P µ�
;'f f - •
5
5
I, '#
u
t
#a
�z� a
• w.� .^fir. � H ��z� .,
'F
t �
r "
z
' Jei� F�'u+Wk•r�:reY�n.'t?^4w.,..��'-W �F't=' -ate
1
>. f errs
� 9
arm -.u.,�.:?r_ r a,+,.,�• - - ,� .r x c a � � !I s,��`
as
.e•'Mr_Aiin^"v" ^�£a'"h - ti W'48•�'� M k
M Y 4
I - ` a
or
T �
StTBSTA\DARD BUILDI\G tNSPL(IT'IO\ REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CIT1 OF BEAL IIONT 6.
INFI IAL INSPECTION DATE Januar-v 23, 2003 NNARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1560 College and Garage
OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt
ADDRESS _ 3755 Delaware AIt 4 CITE'/STATE (06)-7936
APPRAISAL VALUE
I-and Value 71)11
ImproNemcnt Value 4420
Total Valuc 11610
A. FiftN (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members." YES X ',O
B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' 1'ES X NO
( . Fire (I ama.,cd° YES X NO
D. Enrolled in Wort: Repair Program? YES X NO 113/11/03 thru (17/14/03
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure has had fire damage in the attic area. There is smoke
damage throughout the structure from the fire The roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed.
'The fascia boards are rotted There is water damage to the interior due to the fire. All dammed or rotten
windows and window sills will need to be replaced The windows are covered with bars but are open allowing
Nvater inside The side porch canopy is very deteriorated also the back porch is deteriorated. The porches
are being used for homeless to hang out The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced.
There is termite damage to the structure The foundation has rotten sills. Some sa22ing. The interior-
flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired The structure was viewed through the
vNindows The exterior paint is peeling all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures wvilf need to be
replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. There has been no
work from the enrolled work program and no permit was ever purchased. Based on the extensive repairs
needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%o of its appraised value, staff'is
recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE :ATTACHED PHOTOS
' S .
�.
k
4r�'wA1RM S
•
a
y-
_.
-„msµ -�•-.. .. _�_ _y_ . �._
w
lk
4 X
9�•
1560 COLLEGE
•
a .
„
* e
w,
K
'W k
2 �
iv
k .. kl.. ,.
ON
w
s
b
.+
.x •y+ � � - a �� � ��+
+
s
s
x
a
.., a
• +fib. :'., ,
•
4 -
•
k �
k
3
tt p y�H
r!;
m ,
1.
V*
0
MRt
AM
'q,
•
;� � �� � ,° a ,�<� ',, ��.� - -d�"fie�3 •
tea �i
f F'
4
•
YP
ISO
Wo
$ M
71,
fl
4
F a9
47
I�
• a.
a a
ww
It �. m
" e ,
Vw
M
. f e
0. A�
•
WIN
L4T f a.
f
w . F1 , x -
to
r
0 . jr y
r
i
+.za
limb
lit"
4 Oak
t`
� v
}
L � r
d t Cc
r -
.z
I ry
N ✓y f� Is.. �1
z iy.
y i
he
e
41 I a
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION
is (TI-Y OF BEAt MONT 7.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE November 3, 2003 NNARD I
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 5645 Comstock Road
01� Nl:R Robert D. Tanner ET UX
XDDRESS 5390 Linda Lit CITY/STATE (08)-2522
XITRAISAL VAIA1:
Land \ alue 84111
11111m cement Value ?791)
Total V',line 16200
V Fift. (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
13. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members." YES X NO
C. Fire damaged:' YES NO X
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program:' YES X NO 12/04/03 thru 114104/03
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS. This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed The
rear section of the roof has extensive deterioration attempts have been made to patch the roof. It appears
that the structure is being used for storage The rafters are rotted There is water damage to the interior
due to the condition of the roof. The back steps are missing The back door is damaged and will need to be
,-eplaced. The foundation has some sagging in the rear. The interior flooring ceilings and walls are
dammed and will need to be repaired The ceilings are damaged all dammed electrical wiring and
electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to
be replaced. NO hermits have heen purchased. The vard is fenced in for horses Based on the extensive
repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value
staff is recommending a raze order for this structure
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
9 a
Aa a
7
_ p
r
w. p
IA
To
T
5645 COMSTOCK RD
t
F7 f 4
ar
4
, r
I PV
y °-
m
�M
, F
1
�Iltr'
x
•
k
g
t
w
w
Alk
•
a
+�. ,"gym � Ki.pi�S,k�V c':2k: "� t ■' +.. a ^�
-
M.
SVBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION
0 CITY OF BEACNIONT 8-
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 25, 2005 NNARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3090 Concord (Commercial)
ONNNER Joseph L. Ramey
ADDRESS 3030 Gulf St. CITY/STATE (03)-4337
APPRAISAL VALC E
Land Value 411911
Improwment Yaluc 5910
Total Value 10000
A. Fift} (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting meml)ers? YES X NO
t3. I'll ir0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO X
1). Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is rusty and deteriorated Some of the
metal is pulling loose. The fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced all damaged or rotten
windows and window sills will need to be replaced The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be
replaced. There is termite damage to the structure Some of the exterior siding is rotten and is pulling away
from the structure. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all
damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property has a rental sign posted
on the exterior wall. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs
will exceed over 501%, of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
�I
II
4 =
f. at
Y Y �
4,S
9
i
x se• r wT-�, ..
'
I
E ,
I
Sam
S t
r I�
q
f 4 I
. 3090 CONCORD RD (COMMERCIAL)
x`
e
k �
.k!
� k
� 3s"
V alga
} s b
INN
f r
4-
f
a ,x -
# gy
I
' r
u,
vat
WNW
� • � � c��� <.X'4 has
1 Il
SUBSTANDARD DARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BI ILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAT .\ION"F 9-
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE July 7. 2004 NVARD 1
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 6715 Concord (Commercial)
0\NNI_R lna Farris
ADDRESS 5465 Cole Rd. CITY/STATE (08)-4301
APPRAISAL Y_1LLE
Land Yaluc 10830
Inprmanent \ aluc -12520
Total Yaluc 33350
�. Fifty (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X N0
13. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES X NO
( . Fire damaged" YES NO x
D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program:' Y'ES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this structure has extensive deterioration. There are holes
throughout the roof. The roof is collapsing. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be
replaced. "There is extensive water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All damaged or
rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior doors will need to be replaced all
damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and
t�lumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. The inspection was viewed through the windows The structure
is secure. The property has a "For Sale" sign posted on the front of the building Based on the extensive
repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value
staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS
4w{I{y;
a
w,
•r '�. �''a gip.�;�: $f� • �� y�� .x :p"•'�
s ry�
1•M :fi t 4 a�V.� .- ,
^pM �' e`•'3fr k f �=Sx v�`6} �� .Mw a
.� �x M4k 4 .*� � yr L3 •'T, i �` 1+
r
�•w3 1
. r
*rF
g
r
t
� 6
Vu
y
y� s
� r _
I
r
` d
if
N a
r
e
a
1n
rat
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION 10.
0 CFFY OF BEAUN10VF
INI'VIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 9, 2003 «ARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECFION 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds)
MN N ER Shirlex J. Shankle c/o J. B. Swearingen
ADDRESS _ 1020 Lilac Lane CITY/STATE (06)-5523
\PPRAIS:IL VAI_[ E
Land Value 24511
ImproNrment Value 0
I*otal Value 2451)
A. FiftN (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X 10
t3. 'FhiI.0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damaged" YES NO X
1). Enrolled in \Mork Repair Program? YES NO
E. DELINQUENT TEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,501.45 PLUS COST OF JUDGEMENT.
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: These two metal sheds are collapsing and are not repairable. The tin is
loose and unattached. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these relmirs
4p-,N ill exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
l I,
44WA"
FT' g 8
s iFy�,
Oi
ve-
im
�►
i�
.J
w
Xy.zo
• 2039 DEALWARE
h.
A
gal
1�V. .h.r'. ,. �J✓fY'
a
� xh y i dj
r
SVBSTA D--kRD BUILDING INSPECTIOti REPORT
BI ILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAFNIONT 11.
INITIAL IN'SPECTION' DATE Ju1v 24. 2003 NVARD 4
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage)
ONN N E R A. F. Davis
ADDRESS 4130 Ector CITN'%STATE (OS)-3539
APPRAISM- VALGE
Land \ clue 2450
lmproNen►ent Value 100311
Total Value 18180
A. Fift% (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting;members? It ES X NO
13. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of suppo►-ting; members? YES X NO
C. Fire danw-ed? YES NO X
D. Enrolled in work Repair Pro;;ram? YES NO X
E. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE A MOUNT OF S1,327.40. NO LEGAL ACTION.
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This garage has collapsed. There is one partial wall still standing The
remaining part of the structure is a danger to anvone in the area The property is very overgrown Based
loon the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'% of its
appraised value, staff is recommending a race order for this structure
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
i
r
w � f
N� iy�YO •� � �::
V
`
ol
Aix
` A ry ~
.' *
�
0,
Tl
k:
s �F.
btu
a
I � '
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAT 190NT 12.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE FebruarN 1-5, 2005 NNARD 4
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 620 Edgemore Drive
ONVNER David Christopher Cluck
ADDRESS _ 1424 N. 22"" St. CITY/STATE Nederland, Tx. 77627-5738
%PI%-ikiSAL VALLE
Land Value 2.51111
ImproNement Value 12870
Total Value 1.53711
A. HIIN (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting memhers? YES X NO
B. rtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO X
1). Enrolled in �Vork Repair Program? YES N0 X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is rustv and will need to be replaced
"there is water damage to the interior due to the leaking roof a neighbor stated that the structure has had
0:►bout two feet of water in the house. He stated that it had flooded numerous times over the vears. The
bottom plates and some of the studs in the exterior walls are damaged all damaged or rotten windows and
winclow sills will need to be replaced There is broken glass in the windows The interior flooring walls and
ceilings ,vvill need to be repaired The walls and ceilings are stripped to the studs The structure is open and
accessible and the vard is overgrowvn Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact
that these repairs will exceed over 50"% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
•
Air 01
Tl
IL
A
�s t
P 1 3
#y 91 Rb.r � L
gyp?
a
k—
. w
r
'1
Ei
g,
a =
M
4 li � 7J.Ijn 1
�1
a ^�
•
r
:
•
y 4{
s.
k ffi
x,
I
a
d
•
jo
Yl
•
St'BSTANDARD BUILDING I\SPECTION REPORT
[3t 11-DING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAt NIONT 13_
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE June 11. 2003 NN ARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2370 Forrest (Garage)
OWNER .Mildred Coleman
:ADDRESS 8075 Glen Eagles CITY/STATE (07)
APPRAISAL VALI E
t_and � xluc 74;()
In►promllent Value 106311
Total Valuc 17380
�. Fifty (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES x NO
B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO x
D. Enrolled in wort: Repair Program." YES NO x
F. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S1,332.01. NO LEGAL ACTION.
1IAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: "This garage has nearly collapsed. The structure is leaning extensively to
the right and is in a very unsafe condition. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the
fact that these repairs will exceed over 50010 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE ATTACHED 11110TOS
i
r
°
r
r
w r
r
•
IF s
Id
Ap
4r 4,r`
opt-
Ij
. a•
�$ - 1
4e �. 1yh
• 2370 FORREST
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAUNIONT 14.
INITIAL. INSPECTION DATE March 23. 2005 NNARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 985 Fulton Avenue
ONN NER Willie Andrews
ADDRESS 985 Fulton St. CITY/STATE (01)-7314
%PPR.kISAL VA1,UE
Land Value 1471)
Improvement Value 22320
Total Value 23790
�. Fifty (5111 percent deterioration of non-supportin" members? YES V NO
B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting; tnembers? YES x NO
C. Fire dama!oed? YES NO
I). Enrolled in \1ork Repair Program? YES NO x
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. The
rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. The front porch canopy has totally
collapsed and has fallen against the front of the structure. There is water damage to the interior due to the
0condition of the roof. The exterior doors will need to be replaced. All damaged or rotten windows and
window sills will need to be replaced. There is extensive termite damage to the structure. The foundation
has extensive deterioration. The interior flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be
repaired. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed
over 50`%) of its limraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
m v
,s
mar 2¢ �
{
w..
JJ
='s w
i
lz
Nil
Ad
It
F °JM'
Row-
�3
� rf.
a '
9
a `
h°
f >?
985 FULTON
la'
s
a
eI - „ IRI`II
-
~
lom
i � !
•
{, ik
�{ gJ
t4�
d I
31
1,Id
f �
Oa
.................................................................
IM
D a. XOM II
•
q
u.
w
ol
As.2DW
LL
3 �
•
r -
FTM
s
0 im i"M
ll
TT
4
a r
� 1
�w-
Mr""'y
T
•
� 1,1
x
I
•
•
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BI It-DIiNG CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAUNIONT 15.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE November 16, 2004 WARD 3
:ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1650 Gill
ONN'NER Zohreli Shahrodi
ADDRESS 1225 Wilchester Cir CITY/STA"TE (06)-4325
VIIRAISAL VALUE
Land Value 21750
ImproNement Value 21610 (Nlultiple Structures)
Total Valuc 46360
A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO
B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C'. Fire damaged." YES NO X
1). Enrolled in work Repair Program:' YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. 'The
roof is sagging The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. The front and back
porches are deteriorated and will need repair. There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of
Othe roof. The exterior doors will need to be replaced. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will
need to be replaced The windows have broken glass and the window frames are damaged. There is termite
damage to the structure. The foundation has extensive deterioration. The interior flooring,walls and ceilings
are damaged and will need to be repaired The structure is open and accessible and being vandalized. There
is human waste throughout the structure Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the
fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%0 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
i
r
i
+ V, a
M�w•v �-� - ate:
y
07:.2cy.
kd
R MW
ak
is �4 uyyWyy>�i.0 8. ',5�„ras` 4 s-^t,a
p t:
1650 GILL
•
I
no
W
Mrd
Eyz,C^
y :
P`
3
t
3
a ;
Mm
Y
F .
IN --I amiiiim
r:. 3 63yn1.
�XA"1MkSPr
law
III
r
a.
.. n
�r
IV
� n"P
SL BSTANRAiRD BLILDI\G I\SPLCTION RLPORT
[WILDING CODES DIVISION
C[TY OF BEAT \10\T 16.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE October 15, 2004 WARD 4
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4225 Goliad (Commercial)
MN NER J. S. Douglas MD
ADDRESS 2550 Houston St. CITY/STATE (0t)-6721
\PPRAISAL VXLLE
Land \ clue 53911
ImproNrmeot Value 23230
I Mal \ Atle 286211
A. Fifth (5I1) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO
B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES X NO
C. Fire damaged'.' YES X NO
D. Enrolled in Wort: Repair Program? YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This commercial structure has had extensive fire damage to the flat roof
on this building. The roof is falling in. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and dammed by the fire.
There is water damage to the interior due to the fire. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will
need to be replaced. The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. The interior flooring,
ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. The ceilings have extensive fire damage. All
damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all damaged plumbing and
plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. This structure is less than a block from a school. Based on the
extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its apiwaised
value, staff'is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
•
. I
i
•
a
�iwb�
r
a�
•
42 25 GOLIAD
y
E i '
t,
s ,
ir
31
4 d r
� � m
'•� iii I'll"i
"fan
rid
S It
4.
� 9
kE I
I
•
rte• �, ... _
e
_ e
IAI
KIP
•
d
Fa
-» AL
I a
.e s �r
�w
>a �r
4 1461`
i s
SUBSTANDARD BUILDI\G INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
t [TY OF BEAL NIONT 17.
INI" IA L, INSPECTION DATE March 12, 2003 V'BARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1285 Isla —
ONVNE:R Janice Y. VVingate _ —
ADDRESS P O Box 4111 CITY/STATE (04)-4111
APPRAISAL VALUE
Land Valuc 2330
ImproNement Value 25420
Total Valuc 27750
A. FiflN (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting, members:' YES N NO
11. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supportim, members:' YES x NO
C. Fire dammed:' YES N 10
1). Enrolled in wort.Repair Program? YES Y NO 11105103 thru 03/05/044
E. DELINQUENT TA\ES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF 51,105.71, NO LEGAL ACTION.
MAJOR CODE VIOI-ATIONS: There is a small amount of fire damage in the rear of this structure. New
shingles will be needed There is extensive water damage to the interior of the structure. All dammed or
rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There is broken glass in the windows. The doors
are missing. There is extensive termite damage. The foundation has extensive deterioration. The floor joist
are rotten The interior flooring,_ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. The structure
is open and accessible and the entire interior has been vandalized and striRped. There are holes throughout
the flooring and the walls have been busted out All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will
need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing and plumbiny,fixtures will need to be replaced. .4 huddink=
permit was bought 11/06/0 3 but no work has been done. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this
structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending
a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
6
g �
a"
r r., -u
a
�.
r�
g a�
3,77 T- 77
IT
a; y j Sri
AML
a
• 1285 ISLA
•
3gj
a ip etc �e
'a
r
�y'9'7il a��r
07.28.
ILI
"
•
L.
§;tea
lu ii w
-4 �: „
u. �
' AWL
L
�;
,
� n
a
hq
� 4 i
IVA
ulmi
AU
AW
Sl
..,
Wr '
r
O A -
' CSI
r
�a
lip-
w
a3�
a+: y
}
•
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAT VONT 18.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE 'March 10. 2003 \NARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3275 Ledet Road (Garage)
O\YNER audrev M. & Mavis Charmouche
_ADDRESS 3275 Ledet Road CITY/STATE (08)-1216
%PPRAISAL VALUE
Land �slue 500
hnproNement Value 19361) (Residence and garage)
Total Value 19860
A. Flft} (51)) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
B. ['hirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
( . Fire damaged:' YES NO X
ll. Enrolled in AVork Repair Program? YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This garage has extensive deterioration and is collapsing The metal roof
is caving in. The rafters and fascia boards are rotten and will need to be replaced. There are holes
lothroughout allowing water damage to the interior of the garage There are no doors on the structure. Based
on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%► of its
appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
i
e
w i
9 w�'
r �
•
ML
40
4
k
Y
• 3275 LEDET
•
r
s
a
Alp
ems,
,w
• E
y
w
* ". °
, z
3.°
low
•
•
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BI_ ILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAtAI0NT 19.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE August 30, 2002 NNARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1832 Liberty (Rear Garage Apartment)
OWN E R John Fisher
ADDRESS 13695 Rolling Hills Drive CITY/STATE (13)-8411
APPRAISAL �'ALCE
Land Valuc 50150
Impro%rment Value 1-5340 (More than one structure)
I otal Value 20990
A. Fifts (51I) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO
13. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting; members? YES x N0
( . Fire damaged? YES \O x
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES x ti0 (16/16/03 thru 10/10/03
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles on this structure appear slightly worn. Some rafters and
fascia boards are rotted on the rear side. The exterior stairs to 2"' floor living area are listing and very
unstable. Then are made of concrete. The structure appears to being used for storage. The bottom garages
are full of building materials. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced.
There is broken glass in some of the windows and sorne damage to window frames, sills and trim. The doors
are deteriorated. The exterior siding is rotted. The supporting,sills are not stable and the structure appears
to be sagging or listing a small amount. all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be
replaced. :also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. A building permit was
purclused 116127103 but no work ha.c been clone. The rear yard is very overgrown. This structure was
presented before the Historic Landmark Commission on August 8 2005 and was approved for demolition.
Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 5,V4,
of its appraised value. staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
s
•
1832 LIBERTY
•
T
1:
'�.��' I .� 9►'"'.n �.:�A � �" �'�h!" ',�!S '':gip'��� .
'
r
r r
s
W da
:Y i�bC
f� r
:j
� a
mt
` Iki 1
Y
r s
•
ft c '
,r
p
s I`
Nor
AQ
ek
CON 00 TI
td
mp-
e r
d
•
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITN OF BEA[ NIONT 20.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE May 25, 2005 NVARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1430 Live Oak and Rear .Nietal Shed
ONN NER L. G. ,Matthews
NDI)RESS 1430 Live Oak St. CITY/STATE (03)-5232
APPRAISAL VALIJ:
I'and Value 2450
ImproNemcnt Value 13450
Total Valuc 159110
A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting;members? YES R NO
B. Ihirti-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES R NO
C. Fire darrui:red? YES NO R
1). Enrolled in work Repair Program? YES NO R
E. DELINQUENT TARES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,953.48, NO LEGAL ACTION.
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles on this structure's roof are worn. There is water damage to
the interior of the structure. The exterior doors are missing and will need to be replaced. All damaged or
rotten windows and Nvindow sills will need to be replaced. The windows are broken out. The foundation
has extensive deterioration. The interior flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be
repaired. The flooring in the kitchen is rotten. The structure is open and accessible and being vandalized.
The yard is trashed and overgrown There is a shed in the rear of the property- that is collapsing. Based on
the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%0 of its
appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
,F
f
� � I
.. P
r
•
7
y � I
1
t
• 1430 LIVE OAK
•
s I
h
a � -
Al
A's
* 11.e
•
955
E
k
U "mss -z
i. NFi.. yp
t
Am �..
Yt�
�
tr
t
7°e
-' illie
Lb
All
Y K f
IP,.°,°• y`yetis`m'':` ,, -- F�. ��i:"".. Y °a.�'t ,� ....�5 .5.�.. .1.. .
i
i
b
•
olv .
'4.
El
1 � h
v
SHED IN REAR •
•
St'BSTANDARD WILDING, INSPECTION REPORT
[WILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAT MONT 21.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 25, 2005 «ARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1750 Live Oak (Commercial) _
0\N'NER Juston Joseph & George Bruno
_ADDRESS 4050 Cleveland St. CITY/STATE (03)-2952
APPRAISAL VALIT
Land V'aloe 16610
Impro�rnlent Value 1000
Join► Value 17610
V Fifth (5II) percent deterioration of non-sup Ito rtin-members? YES A NO
B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? 1'E S Y NO
( . Fire dama�,ed? YES 'SO 1
1). Enrolled in Work Repair Proar on? YES NO
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this commercial structure is deteriorated. The rafters and
fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is extensive water damage to the interior of the
structure due to the condition of the roof The exterior doors are missing and will need to be replaced. All
40damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are broken out and
missing. The interior- flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be repaired. The structure
is open and accessible and is full of debris Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the
fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
Mk +
f �
Y E '
$ 6I
Air
ll l
t
fit
1 a �
r �
ar,
r
, r
"u
rp
..r
p
t
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING ('ODES DIVISION
CIT1 OF BEAUNIO NT 22-
IN EIAL INSPECTION DATE February 4, 2003 NN ARD 3
1DDRESS OF INSPECTION 1045 Long (Garage)
0 N N,F R Charles B. Crabbe
ADDRESS _ 928 East Drive CITY/STATE (06)-473;
APPRAISAL VALCE
Land Valuc 14811
ImproNcuient Value 22550 (Residence and garage)
Total Value 24030
A. FiRN (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES x NO
B. I'll irtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO
(`. Fire damaged? YES N0 x
I). Enrolled in \N'ork Repair Program:' 1'ES NO x
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this garage has extensive deterioration and new decking will
be needed. The rafters and fascia boards are rotten and will need to be replaced. There is water damage
to the interior due to the leaking roof. The exterior doors are missing and one side has a tarp covering the
90penim-)r. There is a car inside. The siding has extensive rot and deterioration. Based on the extensive repairs
needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50%o of its appraised value, staff is
recommending a raze order for this Structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
r°
in
' d
' 9f a
I � l
I
d:
iW
r
- T
,e.., >3
I
a+•m � � x
' yly
atati.Y^
_ ,• k Amin'
1045 LONG
r
m x �'
.k. r a fi
r
s h.
-"• �a�drywr,a�j
-
_, www
H
NNM Aar
$C
cul N-1;
St'BSr '.a1D.aRD BUILDING IISPECTION REPORT
Bt I1-DING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEALIMOW 23.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE July 17. 2003 \WARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1499 Madison (Garage)
OWN N E R Jim E. Roberts
_ADDRESS 1499 Madison St. CITY/STATE (0t)-7517
APPRAISAL VAIJ E
Land \ 111uc 1971)
Imprmement Value 18820 (Residence and garage)
Total Value 2117911
A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO
E3. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO x
I). Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES NO x
:MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This garage has nearly collapsed. The structure is leaning extensively to
the left and is in a very unsafe condition. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact
that these rej)airs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
ME-
.........
fill "
SUBSTANDARD BUILDItiG I\SPE("TION REPORT
Bt IL.DING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAUNIONT 24.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Nlay 25. 2005 NYARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2797 Magnolia (('ommercial)
ONYNER Robert E & Doris A. Campbell TRSTEE
ADDRESS 4420 Beale St. CITY/STATE (0S)-4705
APPRAISAL VALC E
I-and Value 79211
ImproNement Value 18070
Fotal Value 25990
X. Fifty (,m percent deterioration of non-supporting members`.' YES x NO
I3. I-hirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES x NO
C. Fire damaged. YES NO x
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program:' YES NO x
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this commercial structure is deteriorated. All damn e; d or
rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are broken out and missing allowing
rain to ruin interior walls and flooring. Some of the windows have plywood covering them and the structure
40 was secure at the time of inspection. The interior flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to
be repaired. The doors are damaged and will need replacing. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical
fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced.
Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50%
of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
40
•
s
414 �r t
•
x
¢ ro
07.27.
• 2797 MAGNOLIA
I
V
� t g
7 � G
a
t ^
- r
-71-V *
w
x�
f�.
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEM NIONT 2.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE April 277, 20W; «ARD 4
:ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1096 Alabama avenue (Commercial)
ONN N E R Global New Millennium Partners LTD
,ADDRESS 6671 Southwest Fwv Ste 43�; CITY/STATE Houston, Texas 7707=1-2212
APPRAISAL VALt'E
Land Value 57611
Impro-ement Value 1696111
'total Value 173711
A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
B. Thirty-tlu-ec (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
( . Fire damaged.' YES X NO
D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program? YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal exterior of this building has been dammed by fire. The metal
roof has extensive damage There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All
damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There is broken Mass in the windows.
101he exterior doors need to be replaced The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need
to be repaired all dammed electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all
damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced No work has been done. The structure
is secure at present time Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these
repairs will exceed over 50`10 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
� kI
��Jdr
M
1096 ALABAMA
A
a
t
< i
iw
mr
A,
1
V
�a x
+►
*r
� A
� 1
r�.
'r
SYa r,-g
N
ol
•
a vA
w
.:s
FE
lot
x �
P
dpl t'
1 440
•
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ItiSPECTION REPORT
B( ILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEA1 N10NT 3'
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE September 9 2003 WARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2485 Avenue 11 (Garage Apartment)
O« N E R Melvin Minnard, Jr. ET UX
_ADDRESS 7000 Ebonv Ct CITY/STATE Plano, Texas 75024-2109
APPRAISAL VALUE
Land Value 2-500
InlproNanent Value 10510 (More than one structure)
Total Value 13010
1. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO
B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO_ x
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? VES x NO 10131103 thru 03/01/04
Est. 0410V05
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles appear a little worn Some fascia was changed but some is
,,till rotten The stairs have new handrails but the steps are deteriorated all damaged or rotten windows
and window sills will need to be replaced There are some new windows and there are a couple that still need
to be changed The screens are missing The garage doors are missing Some of the deteriorated exterior
siding has been changed The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired.
Ali damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing
and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced 9 building permit was bought 10131103. 'Vo electrical nor
t)lcuinhingpernrits there purchased Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact tliat
these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value stab' is recommending a raze order for this
structure.
SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS
- � t
v k
e. '- yp•ra
1 IF+y
e _
icy►
F TAY"uV r 1. t-
R
w
°
° e "
4'
IM
I t
-
�
e ,_
r ' r
t
I�
41 .
r +
,fir¢ -
IOU
� a
r a
f
r
�t
'T 1
• , r n
r
7
u F
•
po�
I
- . OWN" \\~
i .
.
. y • �� >� �.�\.� }�� «
:\§� >
<< . . \
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAUMONT 4.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE January 28. 2003 NVARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4040 Blanch
ONN,NER Evelyn Bri as
ADDRESS 790 E. Gill CIT`1'/STATE (03)-3214
XPPRAISAL VALUE
Land Faille 1480
Improvement Value 2951)
Total t'alue 4430
A. Fifth (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO
B. Thil-0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damar,ed? YES NO X
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES X N0 02/11/03 thru 06/11/03
1'. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,628.22 PLUS COST OF JUDGEMENT.
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: There is water damage to the interior of the structure. The rear steps are
dammed All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior front
40door will need to be replaced There is extensive termite damage to the structure. There is extensive
deterioration to the foundation The sills are sitting on the ground in the front. The interior flooring,
ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired All damaged electrical wiring and electrical
fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced.
-1 huilding permit was purchaser! 3/11 103 fir 5500 00 No electrical nor plunthing permits were purchased.
Some repairs were started but there is still extensive repairs to be done The structure is open and accessible.
Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%o
of its appraised value staff is recommendinat raze order for this structure.
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
' F Grp
e .� .JFw t ,po- •,f& � ,��
� I
qY�
:
i F F W
� h
p
T.
wow-
1 I"1 F E
ji
M. �.✓ a #.'' x.'3.3
p.
t
r:
"" i"
t
Ys
y
i
t �
x �
i
b'
a
�u
F ..
I
a
PAX
-HP.
•
•
F
#gyp
r ,
i
•
tea,= a� • , � ,��, ��� � ��
:.,
=y.
Ag
IY.T
� � •� �; k �spa �. ,:
4F
Py $
F
t s ,� 1. `-. icc,
k
SUBSTANDARD BUILDI\G INSPLCTION REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
5'
CITY OF BEAC'INIONT
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Februan, 17, 2005 NVARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1438-44-46 College (Commercial)
OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt
ADDRFSS 375-5 Delaware Apt 4 CITY/STATE (06)-7936
i
APPRAISAL FACIE
Land Value 10780
Imprmement Value 16530
Total Value 27310
A. FiftN (III) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
t3. Thirtc-three (33) percent deterioration of supporti►►g members:' YES X NO
C. Fire dam ul,ed? YES NO \_
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program'' YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is deteriorated. The rafters and fascia
boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is water damage to the interior due to the condition
of the roof all damaged or• rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are
boarded but the window frames are rotted The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced.
There is termite damage to the structure The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need
to be repaired Some of the interior was viewed through the burglar bars on the front door. The siding is
deteriorated and missing allowing outside elements into attic The bottom plates and corner studs are rotten.
X11 damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing
urd plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property is overgrown Based on the extensive repairs
needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value, staff is
recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE AIJACIIED PHOTOS
4
R
W
• a F 4 r
-A
t
w
1438 COLLEGE
�y
I
x .
AU
NP .09,
a,.
w
s
w
1
! r
. '
d s
P� .y
i
x
F
9,
G�.
•
N k "
„�
I+
�F
X
.d+
n
r
r .
•
P•`Y
•
l
Mi
Y �
111 f�
1
P µ�
;'f f - •
5
5
I, '#
u
t
#a
�z� a
• w.� .^fir. � H ��z� .,
'F
t �
r "
z
' Jei� F�'u+Wk•r�:reY�n.'t?^4w.,..��'-W �F't=' -ate
1
>. f errs
� 9
arm -.u.,�.:?r_ r a,+,.,�• - - ,� .r x c a � � !I s,��`
as
.e•'Mr_Aiin^"v" ^�£a'"h - ti W'48•�'� M k
M Y 4
I - ` a
or
T �
StTBSTA\DARD BUILDI\G tNSPL(IT'IO\ REPORT
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
CIT1 OF BEAL IIONT 6.
INFI IAL INSPECTION DATE Januar-v 23, 2003 NNARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1560 College and Garage
OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt
ADDRESS _ 3755 Delaware AIt 4 CITE'/STATE (06)-7936
APPRAISAL VALUE
I-and Value 71)11
ImproNemcnt Value 4420
Total Valuc 11610
A. FiftN (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members." YES X ',O
B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' 1'ES X NO
( . Fire (I ama.,cd° YES X NO
D. Enrolled in Wort: Repair Program? YES X NO 113/11/03 thru (17/14/03
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure has had fire damage in the attic area. There is smoke
damage throughout the structure from the fire The roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed.
'The fascia boards are rotted There is water damage to the interior due to the fire. All dammed or rotten
windows and window sills will need to be replaced The windows are covered with bars but are open allowing
Nvater inside The side porch canopy is very deteriorated also the back porch is deteriorated. The porches
are being used for homeless to hang out The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced.
There is termite damage to the structure The foundation has rotten sills. Some sa22ing. The interior-
flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired The structure was viewed through the
vNindows The exterior paint is peeling all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures wvilf need to be
replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. There has been no
work from the enrolled work program and no permit was ever purchased. Based on the extensive repairs
needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%o of its appraised value, staff'is
recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE :ATTACHED PHOTOS
' S .
�.
k
4r�'wA1RM S
•
a
y-
_.
-„msµ -�•-.. .. _�_ _y_ . �._
w
lk
4 X
9�•
1560 COLLEGE
•
a .
„
* e
w,
K
'W k
2 �
iv
k .. kl.. ,.
ON
w
s
b
.+
.x •y+ � � - a �� � ��+
+
s
s
x
a
.., a
• +fib. :'., ,
•
4 -
•
k �
k
3
tt p y�H
r!;
m ,
1.
V*
0
MRt
AM
'q,
•
;� � �� � ,° a ,�<� ',, ��.� - -d�"fie�3 •
tea �i
f F'
4
•
YP
ISO
Wo
$ M
71,
fl
4
F a9
47
I�
• a.
a a
ww
It �. m
" e ,
Vw
M
. f e
0. A�
•
WIN
L4T f a.
f
w . F1 , x -
to
r
0 . jr y
r
i
+.za
limb
lit"
4 Oak
t`
� v
}
L � r
d t Cc
r -
.z
I ry
N ✓y f� Is.. �1
z iy.
y i
he
e
41 I a
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION
is (TI-Y OF BEAt MONT 7.
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE November 3, 2003 NNARD I
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 5645 Comstock Road
01� Nl:R Robert D. Tanner ET UX
XDDRESS 5390 Linda Lit CITY/STATE (08)-2522
XITRAISAL VAIA1:
Land \ alue 84111
11111m cement Value ?791)
Total V',line 16200
V Fift. (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
13. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members." YES X NO
C. Fire damaged:' YES NO X
D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program:' YES X NO 12/04/03 thru 114104/03
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS. This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed The
rear section of the roof has extensive deterioration attempts have been made to patch the roof. It appears
that the structure is being used for storage The rafters are rotted There is water damage to the interior
due to the condition of the roof. The back steps are missing The back door is damaged and will need to be
,-eplaced. The foundation has some sagging in the rear. The interior flooring ceilings and walls are
dammed and will need to be repaired The ceilings are damaged all dammed electrical wiring and
electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to
be replaced. NO hermits have heen purchased. The vard is fenced in for horses Based on the extensive
repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value
staff is recommending a raze order for this structure
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
9 a
Aa a
7
_ p
r
w. p
IA
To
T
5645 COMSTOCK RD
t
F7 f 4
ar
4
, r
I PV
y °-
m
�M
, F
1
�Iltr'
x
•
k
g
t
w
w
Alk
•
a
+�. ,"gym � Ki.pi�S,k�V c':2k: "� t ■' +.. a ^�
-
M.
SVBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION
0 CITY OF BEACNIONT 8-
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 25, 2005 NNARD 3
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3090 Concord (Commercial)
ONNNER Joseph L. Ramey
ADDRESS 3030 Gulf St. CITY/STATE (03)-4337
APPRAISAL VALC E
Land Value 411911
Improwment Yaluc 5910
Total Value 10000
A. Fift} (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting meml)ers? YES X NO
t3. I'll ir0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO X
1). Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is rusty and deteriorated Some of the
metal is pulling loose. The fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced all damaged or rotten
windows and window sills will need to be replaced The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be
replaced. There is termite damage to the structure Some of the exterior siding is rotten and is pulling away
from the structure. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all
damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property has a rental sign posted
on the exterior wall. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs
will exceed over 501%, of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
�I
II
4 =
f. at
Y Y �
4,S
9
i
x se• r wT-�, ..
'
I
E ,
I
Sam
S t
r I�
q
f 4 I
. 3090 CONCORD RD (COMMERCIAL)
x`
e
k �
.k!
� k
� 3s"
V alga
} s b
INN
f r
4-
f
a ,x -
# gy
I
' r
u,
vat
WNW
� • � � c��� <.X'4 has
1 Il
SUBSTANDARD DARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
BI ILDING CODES DIVISION
CITY OF BEAT .\ION"F 9-
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE July 7. 2004 NVARD 1
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 6715 Concord (Commercial)
0\NNI_R lna Farris
ADDRESS 5465 Cole Rd. CITY/STATE (08)-4301
APPRAISAL Y_1LLE
Land Yaluc 10830
Inprmanent \ aluc -12520
Total Yaluc 33350
�. Fifty (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X N0
13. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES X NO
( . Fire damaged" YES NO x
D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program:' Y'ES NO X
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this structure has extensive deterioration. There are holes
throughout the roof. The roof is collapsing. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be
replaced. "There is extensive water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All damaged or
rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior doors will need to be replaced all
damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and
t�lumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. The inspection was viewed through the windows The structure
is secure. The property has a "For Sale" sign posted on the front of the building Based on the extensive
repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value
staff is recommending a raze order for this structure.
SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS
4w{I{y;
a
w,
•r '�. �''a gip.�;�: $f� • �� y�� .x :p"•'�
s ry�
1•M :fi t 4 a�V.� .- ,
^pM �' e`•'3fr k f �=Sx v�`6} �� .Mw a
.� �x M4k 4 .*� � yr L3 •'T, i �` 1+
r
�•w3 1
. r
*rF
g
r
t
� 6
Vu
y
y� s
� r _
I
r
` d
if
N a
r
e
a
1n
rat