HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET SEPT 21 1999 m7ww
� c
City of Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 1:30 P.M.
AGENDA
OPENING
* Invocation Pledge Roll Call
* Presentations and Recognition
* Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items
* Consent Agenda
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. Consider approval of Fire Station 11 reassignment or a staffing plan for the fire
station located at 6375 Walden Road
2. Consider various alternatives to enhance the current EMS system
3. Consider the addition of five employees and additional equipment to the FY 2000
proposed Budget for the Neighborhood Services Division of the Clean Community
Department
4. PUBLIC HEARING: FY 2000 proposed Budget
5. Consider adopting the FY 2000 Budget
6. Consider adopting the FY 2000 Capital Program
7. Consider adopting the 1999 property tax rate
8. Consider approving a contract for the construction of the Delaware Outfall for
the Concord Road Pavement Widening Project
9. Consider authorizing the Mayor to approve the proposed IH-10 Frontage Roads
Project schematic
10. Consider approving a five-year financing agreement for the purchase of a Pierce
Lance Fire Pumper
11. Consider approving an agreement between The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company and the City of Beaumont to widen and improve
the grade crossing on Walden Road
12. Consider approving a three-year contract for long term disability insurance `
13. Consider the handling of third party workers' compensation claims
14. Consider approving a change order for the Ector Street Ditch Crossing of US
69, 96, 287
15. Consider approving a revision to Section 26-24 of the Code of Ordinances relating
to school speed zones
COMMENTS
* Councilmembers comment on various matters
* City Manager's Report
* Public Comment (Persons are limited to 3 minutes)
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids
or services are requested to contact Kyle Hayes at 880-3716 a day prior to the meeting.
1
September 21, 1999
Consider approval of Fire Station 11 reassignment or a staffing plan for the fire
station located at 6375 Walden Road
1 f 1.7E..ifl!_
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michel G. Bertrand, Fire Chief
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 13, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of Fire Station 11 reassignment or a staffing plan for
the fire station located at 6375 Walden Road.
RECOMMENDATION
Since 1997,fire administration has recommended redeploying the crew from Fire Station No. 11 at
2185 Sabine Pass to the Walden Road location. The facility on Sabine Pass may then be utilized by
Beaumont E.M.S. as Medic 3 Station. Redeployment of Medic 3 from its Washington Boulevard
location would provide a cost savings of$5,600 per year lease payments. In response to Council
discussion and community concerns,the administrative recommendation has been revised to place
a ready reserve pumper at the Sabine Pass location, staffed by off--duty personnel in times of
anticipated need. Should staffing be necessary, overtime expense will be incurred.
Based on Council's direction to retain fire service from the Sabine Pass location at minimal or no
additional cost,alternative recommendations were studied.After a comprehensive review of various
options, the administration has provided the following alternative staffing plans for Council's
review.
Alternative staffing plan no. 1 involves departmental reorganization and redeployment of personnel
and equipment from both fire suppression and non-suppression divisions. Alternative staffing plan
no. 2 involves hiring of additional personnel, with funding for the plan provided through General
Fund revenues.
Regardless of what action Council takes on this issue,this fire service area will be closely monitored
by the administration. Monthly status reports and quarterly analysis of fire system performance will
be presented to Council for review.
Staffing Plan for Fire Station
September 13, 1999
Page 2
BACKGROUND `
In 1990, the fire department became aware of deficiencies in response distance and time in the
southwest sector of the community. At that time, no action was taken to correct the deficiencies.
Subsequently, in 1996,an updated study was conducted to examine the fire protection needs within
this sector. The updated study found that serious deficiencies still exist.
To correct this inadequacy, the Insurance Services Office (I.S.0), an independent rating
organization, recommended two options. The report received in September of 1996 recommended
io either relocate one of the two engine company crews located at Fire Station No. I to a proposed
site in the vicinity of Interstate 10-South and Walden Road, or to relocate the engine company crew
from Fire Station No. I 1 to the same site.
By the time the I. S. O.report was received in September, 1996,an initiative was already underway
to consolidate the services provided by Engine 1 and Snorkel 1 at Fire Station No. 1. The purpose
of consolidating these two pieces of equipment was twofold. First,to replace an aging Snorkel unit.
Second,to provide a unit that could be kept in service 100%of the time.Due to staffing constraints,
Engine 1 was frequently placed out of service. On June 13, 1996, a purchase order was issued to
acquire a 100' aerial apparatus that could serve both as a pumper and/or ladder platform. The
department accepted delivery of Truck 1 and the resulting consolidation was implemented April 22,
1997. Consequently, the only recommended option remaining was to relocate the crew of Fire
Station No. 11.
On February 11, 1997, a presentation was made to Council establishing the need for three fire
stations. The presentation focused on the construction of the facilities and the need to adequately
staff the stations with existing personnel. Council authorized to execute an agreement for
architectural services on May 26, 1998. Council awarded the contract for construction of the three
facilities to Daniels Building&Construction on September 29, 1998. Target date for completion of
construction was scheduled for September 30, 1999.
In the period following the award of the construction contract,fire department staff began to prepare
for the implementation of the remaining recommended option,which was to redeploy the crew from
Fire Station No. 11 to the Walden Road site.As the time to make the redeployment has approached,
public concern over the proposed changes emerged.
If Council were to consider and approve the original recommendation, staffing the Walden Road
location would not require hiring additional personnel. The strategy provides more balanced,
uniform coverage for the entire community, greater efficiency in operations, and is the most cost
effective option.
Staffing Plan for Fire Station
September 13, 1999
Page 3
Analysis of Alternative Staffing Plans
Alternative Staffing Plan No. 1
Rename the Walden Road facility Fire Station No. 5. As a short term means of staffing the station,
relocate Truck 1 from Fire Station No. 1 to the Walden Road location. This apparatus was selected
due to its staffing pattern,maneuverability and combined function capability. Relocate Truck 3 from
Fire Station No. 3 to Fire Station No. 1 to maintain ladder service to both the downtown area and
South Park.
This alternative strategy can be implemented for FY2000,but should not be considered a long range
solution. Continued operation of an additional fire station places an added burden on the already
stressed resources of the fire department. In planning for the long range fire protection needs of the
community and safety of firefighters, additional staffing in the fire suppression division and
apparatus realignment will be necessary.
In FY2001, consolidate the services of Engine 9 and Truck 4, located at Fire Station No. 9, 7010
Gladys, by purchasing a single pumper/ladder apparatus. This is similar to the consolidation of
Engine 1 and Snorkel 1. If Council were to approve this alternative, all other scheduled apparatus
replacements would be deferred for FY2001. After the consolidation, the pumper currently located
at Fire Station No. 9 would be relocated to proposed Fire Station No. 5. Truck 1 and Truck 3 would
be restored to their original locations.
If fire administration is directed to provide staffing at the Walden Road station through utilization
of personnel in non-suppression divisions,the following divisions would be affected:fire prevention,
fire training,and fire administration. Although the total number of personnel necessary to staff the
station will be provided from within the department, the adoption of this alternative will create a
negative impact on services provided.
To compensate for this negative impact,reassignment of the three Deputy Chief positions from fire
suppression (24 hour shifts)to day positions (40 hours per week) is required. One Deputy Chief
position would be assigned to fire suppression, one to fire training, and one to fire prevention.
Investigation of the feasibility of civilianization of the fire communications division will be explored
as a means of restoring the reassigned positions from non-suppression divisions.
Current staffing in the fire prevention division consists of seven personnel, which is below current
recommended levels. It is anticipated that three personnel from this division(Grade I, II, III) could
be reassigned with the adoption of this alternative. It is estimated that fire safety inspections will
be reduced by over 50%. Due to the reassignment of the only full-time fire/arson investigator,
fire/arson investigations and clearance rate may also experience a negative impact. Public fire
education and safety programs will be significantly reduced. A reduction of personnel from the fire
prevention division will increase the potential for personal risk to citizens and firefighters and may
result in a greater fire loss. The long term result may be an increase in community fire insurance
Staffing Plan for Fire Station
September 13, 1999
Page 4
rates due to increased fire losses. `
Current staffing in the fire training division consists of three personnel, which is also below current
recommended levels. It is.anticipated that one position from this division (Grade III) could be
reassigned with the adoption of this alternative. Reassignment of this position will eliminate the
program manager for fire and hazardous materials training. The department is regulated by the
Texas Commission on Fire Protection and Environmental Protection Agency in these two areas.
Reassignment of this position may result in suspension of certifications, which in turn, may result
in possible fines due to non-compliance.
Current staffing in fire administration consists of four personnel, including the Fire Chief and
Assistant Chief. It is anticipated that two positions from this division (Grade III - Administrative
Assistant, Grade II - Supply Officer) will be reassigned with the adoption of this alternative.
Reassignment of the Administrative Assistant will eliminate the position responsible for
management of civilian staff, will negatively impact budgeting and purchasing functions, and make
the possibility of transition to an advanced life support first responder program very difficult. The
Supply Officer maintains the protective clothing program to meet state mandated standards,
coordinates maintenance and supply needs of all fire department facilities, and serves as liaison to
vendors and suppliers.Reassignment of this position could result in inability to meet state mandated
protective clothing standards, and deterioration of existing facilities and equipment.
Alternative Staffing Plan No 2
Authorize twelve new firefighter positions, consisting of three Grade III (Captain), three Grade II
(Driver/Operator)and six Grade I(Firefighter)to staff the Walden Road station. Initially, a reserve
pumper could be utilized. It would be necessary to replace the pumper within four years. First year
start-up costs are estimated at$700,000. Recurring costs for personnel, operations and maintenance
for following years are estimated at$670,000 per year.
Summary of Alternatives
The resulting impact of alternative strategies would include continued overlapping service coverage
in the southeast part of the community.Also,it will require an extension of the service life of already
aging fire apparatus. Alternative staffing plan number 2 would necessitate promoting three Grade
II positions to Grade III (Captain), reducing the total number of Grade II positions by three, and
maintaining the current number of Grade I positions for FY2000.
For FY2000 and a portion of FY2001,Engine 3, located at Kenneth and Woodrow, will experience
an increased volume of first responder calls due to the temporary relocation of Truck 3. Response
times for ladder truck service to the south end will be increased during this period,as well. Although
Truck 1 can operate as a pumper, its limited water capacity will require locating a ready reserve
apparatus at the Walden Road station for incidents requiring larger volumes of water carried on the
apparatus.
Staffing Plan for Fire Station
September 13, 1999
Page 5
BUDGETARY IMPACT `
The administrative recommendation will impact the budget through overtime expense only in times
of anticipated need for the ready reserve pumper to be staffed. Due to the uncertainty of this
contingency, there is no accurate way to forecast this expense. It is estimated at approximately
$5,000 per year.
Alternative Staffing Plan No. 1
Total budgetary impact of this alternative staffing plan in FY2000 is estimated at $10,000. This
includes the cost of upgrades at an additional station from Grade II to Grade III, Grade I to Grade
II, and station maintenance costs. Some overtime expense is likely.
In FY2001, a combined pumper/ladder apparatus will be purchased to consolidate Engine 9 and
Truck 4. Estimated cost for this unit at time of purchase is$550,000. This will be an increase above
the cost of scheduled replacement of a pumper by$225,000. Although there will be a short term cost
increase, long term benefits will be-derived through replacing two units through a single purchase,
thereby addressing multiple needs with a single piece of equipment. This would allow the
reassignment of the pumper located at Fire Station No. 9 to Walden Road and eliminate the initial
need to purchase a new pumper.
Alternative Staffing Plan No. 2
Total budgetary impact in FY 2000 for this alternative strategy is $700,000. In following years, it
is estimated that budgetary impact will total approximately$670,000 per year.
PREVIOUS ACTION
On February 11, 1997,a presentation was given to Council in workshop outlining the need for the
construction of three fire stations. The presentation focused on the location of the facilities and
utilization of existing personnel to staff the stations. Council unanimously approved architectural
services on May 26, 1998 and awarded the construction contract for three fire stations September
29, 1998. A presentation was given to Council on issues surrounding fire station locations and
strategic issues on September 7, 1999.No formal action has been considered by Council in reference
to relocation and staffing requirements.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
If the administrative recommendation is approved by Council, the crew from Fire Station No. 11
would be relocated from Sabine Pass to Walden Road. No other Council action would be required.
If alternative staffing plan no. 1 is approved by Council, reassignment of the three Deputy Chief
positions will require an agreement with the Firefighter's Union and an examination of civil service
statutes. Civilianization of the communications division will require an examination of civil service
statutes and case law, and will also require an agreement with the Firefighter's Union.
Staffing Plan for Fire Station
September 13, 1999
Page 6
If alternative staffing plan no. 2 is approved by Council,in FY2000,authorization for three Captain
positions would be required, as well as reduction of three Driver/Operator positions. In FY2001,
Council will consider authorizing purchase of a pumper/ladder unit for the consolidation of Engine
9 and Truck 4.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Executive Assistant to the City Manager and Fire Chief
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny the administrative recommendation or an alternative to staff the fire station facility
located at 6375 Walden Road while retaining the fire service at Fire Station No. 11.
2
September 21, 1999
Consider various alternatives to enhance the current EMS system
City of Beaumont
•r• Council Agenda g a
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Ingrid Holmes, Public Health Director
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consideration of the following alternatives to enhance the
current EMS system.
1. Solicit request for proposals (RFP's) for a one year pilot project
to provide emergency medical services to the community by a private
ambulance staffed with two Paramedics.
2. Add one ambulance unit staffed with two Paramedics to the City's
EMS Division.
3. Continue the current EMS delivery system and implement
management initiatives to improve response times and cost
effectiveness.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends that Council approve alternative number three that allows for
restructuring of the current system while also soliciting RFP's from private companies to
determine if dual paramedics can be achieved from private ambulance companies without a
subsidy from the City.
BACKGROUND
On September 13, 1999, the Administration met with representatives of the local ambulance
companies to discuss the ramifications of issuing an RFP for securing ambulance services staffed
exclusively with certified Paramedics. Based on that meeting, it is not certain whether a subsidy
would be required. With a competitive RFP process it may be possible to achieve compatible
Council Agenda Item - EMS
Page 2
September 15, 1999
service levels with City EMS at no cost to the City.
In addition to implementing the alternative(s) selected by Council, the Administration has
determined that it is in the City's best interest to proceed with initiatives that would enhance the
current EMS system. Staff is implementing the following actions.
f. Prepare and issue an RFP to privatize EMS billings and collections to increase revenues. The
goal is to achieve a 50% increase in payment for services rendered. Based on current revenues
of $800,000, an additional $400,000 would be received and the City's EMS subsidy would be
reduced to approximately $900,000.
2. Develop and implement modified emergency medical dispatch protocols which allow for better
management of the EMS calls received in the Fire Communications Center. The City EMS
system will concentrate on service response to trauma and life threatening calls. The non-
emergency calls for service will be-transferred to private ambulance companies from dispatch or
the incident scene.
3. Revise first responder protocols and practices to facilitate effective utilization of City EMS
calls.
4.Analyze current staffing and scheduling to determine the most cost effective method.
5. Relocate Med Station No.3 from Washington Blvd. to Fire Station No. 11 on Sabine Pass to
address medical service needs of that neighborhood and achieve savings of $5,600 per year in
lease payments.
In October 1998, the City of Beaumont was faced with the announcement of the withdrawal of a
contract by American Medical Response that provided EMS coverage to two areas of the
community. At that time, management and staff explored various options to resolve the situation
and finally decided to replace, through city funds, one of the two ambulances that had been
removed as a result of the contract withdrawal. This replacement is located at 6490 Calder,
leaving the void in the north end of the community.
Overall, response times clearly indicate that the major concern is in this (north end) area. As a
result, increasing response times demonstrate the need to acquire additional ambulance coverage.
Since the inception of the city's 9-1-1 ambulance service, the department has utilized private
ambulance companies to respond to rollover calls. (Those calls that the city cannot respond to
because all units are committed to other calls). From August to December 1998, the city used
private ambulance companies 37 times. By 1999, that number increased to 127. To date, there
have been no formal complaints regarding their use and/or service. These systems are often
Council Agenda Item -EMS
Page 3
September 15, 1999
staffed with a paramedic and EMT. Currently responding to most of these rollover calls are
Goldstar Ambulance Company, and Rural Metro. Other local ambulance companies also provide
assistance when requested to do so.
BUDGETARY IMPACT-
1. If Council approves alternative number 1 to contract with a private provider, there will be a
loss of approximately $200,000 in revenues in addition to any subsidy which is required.
2. If Council approves alternative number 2 to acquire a 5th ambulance unit, it will cost an
additional $400,000 annually.
3. If Council approves alternative number 3 to maintain the current system with management
initiatives, additional revenues are expected from privatized billing services. Additionally, the
relocation of Med Station No.3 to Fire Station No. 11 will save $5,600 per year in lease
payments.
PREVIOUS ACTION
On September 7, 1999, the Administration was requested to take Council comments into
consideration and provide alternatives for an enhanced EMS service.
On August 10, 1999, council was presented with information concerning four alternatives that
address the need to provide additional emergency medical services to the north end of the city.
Each alternative provided information regarding advantages and disadvantages to the system as
well as cost impact. This issue was discussed at the August 31, 1999 council meeting with council
deferring action until September 7, 1999 to acquire additional information on private EMS
service.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
If the first alternative is approved, Council will review the final selection and approve a contract
with a private ambulance company from the submitted request for proposals. If the second
alternative is approved, Council will modify the proposed FY 2000 Annual Operating Budget. If
the third alternative is approved, Council will review the final selection and approve a contract
for the provision of privatized billing services.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Executive Assistant to the City Manager and Public Health Director.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/deny the alternative presented.
3
September 21, 1999
Consider the addition of five employees and additional equipment to the FY 2000
proposed Budget for the Neighborhood Services Division of the Clean Community
Department
A.. Cit y of Beaumont
~ Council Agenda Item
, = g
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: John Labrie, Clean Community Director gxk
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 16, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Authorization to add five (5) additional employees and additional
equipment to the F.Y. 2000 proposed budget for the Neighborhood
Services Division of the Clean Community Department.
RECOMMENDATION
Council consideration for the Clean Community Department to perform all grass mowing activities
for vacant properties and for properties that owners fail to mow.
BACKGROUND
A major administrative initiative is to improve the visual appearance of the city. An important
aspect of this is in maintaining public/private property to quality standards. Currently, mowing of
vacant property has been performed by private companies under contracts with the City. With the
department's management directing the work of city employees, more work will be performed
without the need for numerous inspections, re-inspections, contractor assignments and other task
associated with contract management. The entire program will be streamlined for efficiency and
effectiveness. A better program will be achieved with City employees resulting in a more attractive
city as related to overgrown grass and weeds on vacant properties
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The F.Y. 2000 requested annual budget for mowing contracts is $130,000. Projected F.Y. 99
contract expense is $140,000. Our proposed budget for city mowing that includes five (5)
employees, equipment, equipment maintenance, fuel and supplies total $142,200. A City operated
program would add $12,200 to the requested F.Y. 2000 budget and $2,200 to projected F.Y. 99
contract expense.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY:
City Manager and Clean Community Department Director
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Approve/Deny the addition of five (5) employees and related grass mowing equipment to the
proposed budget F.Y. 2000:
ti 75wir
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
' c CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS
TO: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
FROM: John Labrie, Clean Community Director
DATE: August 17, 1999
SUBJECT: Mowing Contracts
COMMENTS
Back Ground
The current mowing contracts for City Lot Maintenance, Abandoned Property
Maintenance and Privately Owned Properties is $127,000 and they expire on
December 21, 1999. Following is cost data associated with contracts for the past
three years:
FY 97 FY 98 Projected
FY 99
City Lot Maintenance
Total # of Cuttings 765 765 945
Amount Paid to Contractor $19,531.18 $19,541.40 $235239.21
Abandoned Property Maintenance
Total # of Cuttings 1,084 800 1,112
Amount Paid to Contractor $19,895.21 $15,822.72 $20,764.02
Privately Owned Properties
Total # of Cuttings 2,456 2,351 2,979
Amount Paid to Contractor $67,924.48 $683,253.67 $82,884.98
Totals for All Mowing
Total # of Cuttings 4,305 3,916 5,036
Amount Paid to Contractor $107,350.87 $103,617.79 $126,888.21
Page 2
Interoffice to Stephen J. Bonczek
August 17, 1999
We feel that the number of parcels will continue to increase as more condemned
structures are removed by City Crews and Community Block Grant Funds. Fiscal
Year '99 is projected to have an 8% increase in cutting over Fiscal Year '98.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that the City of Beaumont's Clean Community Department
perform all aspects of the Mowing contracts for the following reasons:
1. Quality control and customer service procedures would be better
managed.
2. Request for service and complaints are received by the City and must
be relayed to the contractors, sometimes resulting in misunderstandings
and/or delays in mowing parcels.
3. A contractor will include a profit and a return on capital investment in
a bid while the City is looking only for the lowest cost and more quality
for that cost.
4. The City, under a long term contract, will pay for a capitol investment
in equipment (tractors and mower decks) for a contractor. The City can
buy tractors and mowers for ourselves without additional mark-up for
return on investment and use those tractors and decks for many years.
5. Estimated life for tractors and decks is 8-10 years. Based upon past
equipment maintenance,a 10 year life is achievable making the purchase
a good investment.
6. Mowing cost by the City may be a little higher than contractor's cost at
first because of wages. However, turnover of contractor employees is
usually greater because of low wages and benefits. A stable work force
provides more efficiency and better service.
Page 3
Interoffice to Stephen J. Bonczek
August 17, 1999
7. With a City operated program, the City can control its own future in
mowing parcels by having the ability to make timely changes in its
programs when change will reduce cost.
8. With our own equipment and personnel we would have a greater
opportunity to expand our mowing programs in the future if expansion
becomes beneficial.
Page 4 contains a proposed budget for F.Y. 2000 that includes the total cost of
performing this function in house with Regular City Employees.
Summary
Considering the population shift from East to West meaning more parcels that will
need mowing in the community, mowing expertise of the City's Clean Community
Department, uniform service for all mowing activities, and historical good
management of the department, it would be beneficial and cost effective to have a
complete in-house operated mowing program. Our intent is to provide the best
service to citizens at the lowest possible cost.
I will be available to discuss the proposal with you at your convenience.
John Labrie
Clean Community Director
Page 4
Interoffice to Stephen J. Bonczek
August 17, 1999
Clean Community Department
Mowing Program
Proposed F.Y. 2000 Budget
Personnel Cost (Equipment Operator I) (5) employees $85,300
Benefits $ 85,300 * 35% $309000
Supplies and Equipment $ 3,000
Fleet Maintenance $ 75000
Fuel $ 300
Equipment (Amotorized over 5 years) $13.900(A
Total Estimated Cost 14� 2 200
(3) Tractors $525500
(3) 6 ft. rotary cutter with chains $10,200
(1) Zero turning radius mower 48" cut 6,500
Total 6�9 200
(A) Annual Cost for (7) pieces of equipment (Amotorized over 5 years)
is $13,900. Estimated total cost is $69,200.
4
September 21, 1999
PUBLIC HEARING: FY 2000 proposed Budget
City of Beaumont
•�• Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Andrea S. Deaton, Budget Officer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Hold public hearing on the FY 2000 proposed Budget as advertised
by public notice September 13, 1999.
RECONEWENDATION
It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing on September 21, 1999 to consider increases
in the FY 2000 proposed Budget appropriation.
BACKGROUND
Article VI, Section 6 of the City Charter requires that "before inserting any additional item or
increasing any item of appropriation, it must cause to be published a notice setting forth the nature
of the proposed increases and fixing a place and time, not less than five (5) days after publication,
at which the Council will hold a public hearing thereon."
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The advertised appropriation, net of contingency, for all funds totals $134,592,700. This
appropriation includes an increase of$700,000 in Fire and $450,000 in Public Health.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Article VI, Section 2 of the City Charter requires that the proposed budget be submitted to the
Council at least 45 days prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year. This occurred on August
13, 1999. In addition, Section 4 requires Council to schedule a public hearing on the FY 2000
proposed Budget and authorize the City Clerk to publish the notice of the public hearing. A public
hearing, on the Budget as submitted August 13, 1999, was held on August 31, 1999.
Council Agenda Item
Page 2
September 15, 1999
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
Following the public hearing the Budget may be adopted. The Budget must be adopted no later
than September 27, 1999.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
No motion necessary.
5
September 21, 1999
Consider adopting the FY 2000 Budget
City of Beaumont
~ Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Andrea S. Deaton, Budget Officer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt FY 2000 Budget
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends Council adopt the FY 2000 Budget as submitted to Council on
August 13, 1999.
BACKGROUND
Article VI, Section 8 of the City Charter requires that "the budget shall be adopted by the
favorable votes of a least a majority of all members of the Council." Section 9 states that "the
budget shall be finally adopted not later than the twenty-seventh (27th) day of the last month of
the fiscal year. Should the Council take no final action on or prior to such day, the budget as
submitted by the City Manager shall be deemed to have been finally adopted by the Council."
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Proposed appropriation, net of contingency, for all funds totals $133,472,700.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Public hearings were held August 31, 1999 and September 21, 1999.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer
Council Agenda Item
Page 2
September 15, 1999
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny adopting the FY 2000 Budget.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
ALL FUNDS SUMMARY
FY 1999 FY 1999 Balance FY 2000 FY 2000 Balance
Revenues Expenditures 10/01/99 Revenues Expenditures 9130100
General Fund 63,507,000 62,853,100 7,635,048 65,144,700 67,389,600 5,390,148 (1)
Debt Service Fund 10,425,000 11,181,000 4,205,116 10,909,000 12,407,600 2,706,516
Total Governmental Funds 73,932,000 74,034,100 11,840,164 76,053,700 79,797,200 8,096,664
Water Utilities Fund 19,360,800 19,550,300 2,617,533 19,400,000 19,350,000 2,667,533
Solid Waste Management Fund 6,010,300 5,948,200 3,746,051 5,856,000 6,248,300 3,353,751
Total Enterprise Funds 25,371,100 25,498,500 6,363,584 25,256,000 25,598,300 6,021,284
Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund 1,695,000 1,693,100 166,188 1,780,000 1,886,900 59,288 (2)
Street Maintenance Fund 1,482,000 350,000 1,364,463 1,485,000 2,800,000 49,463
Municipal Transit Fund 2,647,600 2,607,200 582,461 3,261,700 3,550,000 294,161
Other Special Revenue Funds 3,295,200 2,895,400 997,600 2,837,500 3,835,100 _
Total Special Revenue Funds 9,119,800 7,545,700 3,110,712 9,364,200 12,072,000 402,912
Capital Reserve Fund 2,841,500 2,724,500 1,508,333 2,178,900 . 2,713,100 974,133
Fleet Management Fund 3,686,400 3,642,600 401,821 3,696,500 3,699,200 399,121
Employee Benefits Fund 8,810,100 9,502,300 768,270 9,794,500 9,858,900 703,870
General Liability Fund 655,000 754,000 1,186,336 660,000 804,000 1,042,336
Total Internal Service Funds 15,993,000 16,623,400 3,864,760 16,329,900 17,075,200 3,119,460
Total All Funds 124,415,900 123,701,700 25,179,220 127,003,800 134,542,700 17,640,320
(1) FY 2000 General Fund adjusted to reflect the potential appropriation for expanded Fire($700,000) and EMS
.($400,000) services.
(2) Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund adjusted to reflect additional payment of$40,000 to the Art Museum of Southeast Texas.
Adjusted 09/13/99
12
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE REFERRED TO AS THE
"ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE" ADOPTING A
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER
1, 1999 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT; APPORTIONING THE FUNDS OF THE CITY
OF BEAUMONT; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS
OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Beaumont submitted to the City Council
a budget estimate for the revenues of said City and expenses of conducting the affairs
thereof for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1999 and ending September 30, 2000; and,
WHEREAS, after notices and public hearings held in accordance with the
requirements of the Charter of the City of Beaumont and the statutes of the State of Texas,
the City Council is of the opinion that the budget, as attached hereto as Exhibit "A", should
be adopted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
Section 1.
That the budget attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all
purposes is hereby adopted and approved. Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted and approved
as the budget of all the correct expenses as well as the fixed charges of the City for the
fiscal period beginning the 1st day of October, 1999, and ending the 30th day of
September, 2000, and the several amounts stated in Exhibit "A" as proposed expenditures
shall be and become appropriated to the several objects and purposes therein named.
Notices given, as required for the adoption of said budget, are hereby ratified.
Section
That the sums indicated are appropriated from the following schedule of funds:
a. General $67,789,600
b. Debt Service 12,407,600
C. Water Utilities 19,350,000
d. Solid Waste Management 6,248,300
e. Hotel Occupancy Tax 1,886,900
f. Street Maintenance 2,800,000
g. Municipal Transit 3,550,000
h. Other Special Revenue 3,835,100
I. Capital Reserve 2,713,100
j. Fleet Management 3,699,200
k. Employee Benefits 9,858,900
I. General Liability 1,804,000
Section 3
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer budgeted funds from one
line-item to another line item provided the transaction is not an interfund transfer.
Section 4.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or the
application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances should for any reason
be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall in no way affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance, and to such end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable.
Section 5.
That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the
extent of the conflict only.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the
day of , 1999.
- Mayor -
6
September 21, 1999
Consider adopting the FY 2000 Capital Program
City of Beaumont
. Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Andrea S. Deaton, Budget Officer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt FY 2000 Capital Program
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends Council adopt the FY 2000 Capital Program as reviewed at a
public hearing on August 31, 1999.
BACKGROUND
Article VI, Section 20 states that "the Council shall, by resolution, adopt the Capital Program
with or without amendment after the public hearing and on or before the twenty-seventh (27th)
day of the last month of the current fiscal year."
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Estimated funds required to complete current, scheduled and planned projects in the FY 2000
Capital program are $21,810,000.
PREVIOUS ACTION
A public hearing was held on August 31, 1999.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer
Council Agenda Item
Page 2
September 15, 1999
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny adopting the FY 2000 Capital Program.
7
September 21, 1999
Consider adopting the 1999 property tax rate
City of Beaumont
it• Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Andrea S. Deaton, Budget Officer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt the 1999 property tax rate.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends that Council adopt a rate of$0.635 for the 1999 tax year. The tax
rate would be apportioned $0.35 to the General Fund and $0.285 to the Debt Service Fund.
BACKGROUND
Chapter 26 of the Property Tax Code requires taxing units to comply with truth-in-taxation laws
in adopting their tax rates. Beginning with tax year 1998 (FY 1999) Senate Bill 841 required a
taxing unit's governing body to hold a public hearing and publish public notices for a tax increase.
Taxing units are required to hold a public hearing to impose an amount of property tax revenue
that exceeds the preceding year's property tax revenue even if the tax rate remains unchanged.
Based on the calculation by the Jefferson County Tax Office, the published increase in total tax
revenues will be 1.15%
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Property tax revenue in the proposed FY 2000 Budget is calculated at the current rate of$0.635
and totals $23,034,000 for the General and Debt Service Funds combined.
PREVIOUS ACTION
A public hearing was held on August 31, 1999.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
Council Agenda Item
Page 2
September 15, 1999
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny adopting the 1999 property tax rate of$0.635 and apportioning $0.35 to the General
Fund and $0.285 to the Debt Service Fund.
STATE OF TEXAS )
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )
CERTIFICATION OF 1999 APPRAISAL ROLL FOR City of Beaumont
I, Roland R. Bieber, Chief Appraiser for the Jefferson County Appraisal District, solemnly
swear that the attached is that portion of the approved Appraisal Roll of the Jefferson County
Appraisal District which lists property taxable by and constitutes the appraisal roll for City of
Beaumont.
July 26, 1999
Date Roland R. Bieber, RPA
Chief Appraiser
Jefferson County Appraisal District
1999 APPRAISAL ROLL INFORMATION
1999 Gross Value $4,097,257,524
1999 Market Value $3,901.573,185
1999 Gross Taxable Value $3,876.331.695
Total Number of Accounts 61.099
# of Accounts with Homestead Exemption 24.152
# of Accounts with Over-65 Exemption 8.547
# of Accounts with Disabled Exemption 946
# of Accounts with Veterans Exemption 620
# of Agriculture-Use Accounts 239
# of Exempt Accounts 3,419
1999 Taxable Value $3301.491,226
RECEIVED BY: DATE:
EXHIBIT "A"
TAX CALCULATIONS 221 JEFFERSON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT CITY OF BEAUMONT
7/22/99 17.32.14 ADP3TAXC CERTIFIED 7-26-99 1999 APPRAISAL ROLL 12310403 PAGE 1
RATES AND * TAX RATE * HOMESTEAD LOCAL OPTION 00% * OVER SIXTY-FIVE LOCAL OPTION 17,500 DISABILITY LOCAL OPTION 17,500
ALLOWANCES * 0 .635000 * STATE MANDATED 0 * STATE MANDATED - 0 *, STATE MANDATED 0
GROSS VALUE IN DISTRICT ACCOUNTS SUB-TOTALS 61,099 4,097,257,524
* MINUS EXEMPT ACCOUNTS 3,419 195,684,339 3,901,573,185
MINUS AGRICULTURE ACCOUNTS 239
MARKET VALUE 26,535,000
PRODUCTION VALUE 1,293,510
LOSS DUE TO AG EXEMPTIONS 25,241,490
SUBJECT TO LATE PENALTY p
NET APPRAISED VALUE 57,680 3,876,331,695
LOSS DUE TO LIMIT 2,420 6,545,518 3,869,786,177
ABATED ACCOUNTS 0 0 3,869,786,177
HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS 8 5,000,840 3,864,785,337 ,
EXEMPTIONS
STATE MANDATED HOMESTEAD 24,152 0 3,864,785,337
STATE MANDATED 065 8,547 0 3,864,785,337
STATE MANDATED DISABLED 946 0 3,864,785,337
LOCAL OPTION 065 8,547 142,706,417 3,722,078,920
LOCAL OPTION DISABLED 946 15,558,927 3,706,519,993
LOCAL OPTION HOMESTEAD 24,152 0 158,265,344 3,706,519,993
VETERAN EXEMPTIONS
EXEMPTION CODE 1 a 0 5 •0
EXEMPTION CODE 2 a 5000 210 1,015,270
EXEMPTION CODE 3 2 7500 43 297,167
EXEMPTION CODE 4 a 10000 30 266,750
EXEMPTION CODE 5 a 12000 41 459,640
EXEMPTION CODE 6 a 12000 261 2,768,910
EXEMPTION CODE 7 2 12000 18 173,460
EXEMPTION CODE 8 a 5000 12 47,570
TOTAL VETERAN 620 5,028,767
NET TAXABLE 3,701,491,226
GROSS TAX AMOUNT 23,504,491.32 **
FROZEN TAX ACCOUNTS p
MINUS FROZEN TAX .00.00
LOSS DUE TO FROZEN TAX ***
.00
NET TAX AMOUNT ---------------
** GROSS TAX AMOUNT IS CALCULATED ON AN INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT BASIS $23,504,491.32
** INCLUDES 15 PRORATED EXEMPT ACCOUNTS TOTAL PRORATED EXEMPT AMOUNT 111,739
** INCLUDES 262 OVR65 PRORATED ACCOUNTS TOTAL PRORATED OVR65 AMOUNT 2,067,337
** INCLUDES 3 PRORATED DISABLED ACCTS TOTAL PRORATED DISABLED AMOUNT 13,137
, r
TAX CALCULATIONS 221 JEFFERSON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT CITY OF BEAUMONT
7/22/99 17.32.14 •ADP3TAXC CERTIFIED 7-26-99 1999 APPRAISAL ROLL 12310403 PAGE 2
RATES AND * TAX RATE * HOMESTEAD LOCAL OPTION 00% * OVER SIXTY-FIVE LOCAL OPTION 17,500 * DISABILITY LOCAL OPTION 17,500
ALLOWANCES * S .635000 * STATE MANDATED 0 * STATE MANDATED 0 * STATE MANDATED 0
* EXEMPTIONS ACCOUNTS SUB-TOTALS
FC CITY PROPERTY 655 34,836,141
FD DRAIN DIST 160 481,856
FG FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 57 5,049,060
FH HOSPITALS 36 14,471,750
FJ JEFFERSON COUNTY 181 35,425,084
FL HISTORIC LANDMARK 1 616,980
FM MISC 78 1,779,000
FN NAV 3 PORT 123 4,529,000
FO ORGANIZATION-CHAR 149 15,241,873
FP PUBLIC PROPERTY 83 560,500
FR CHURCHES 680 62,060,165
FS SCHOOLS 8 COLLEGES 337 11,494,660
FT STATE OF TEXAS 437 5,603,360
FX CROSS REFERENCE 289 1,770
FY YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS 30 3,357,260
FZ OTHER 2 0
GQ MINERALS LE 500 61 9,930
LB PP POLLUTION CONTROL 1 138,080
LK PER PROPERTY LE 500 61 14,220
LM PERSONAL MISC 2 0
LO PERSONAL CHARITABLE 16 13,650
TOTAL EXEMPTIONS: 3,419 195,684,339
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE TAX ROLL
FOR THE CITY OF BEAUMONT; ESTABLISHING A TAX `
RATE; PROVIDING FOR LEVYING, ASSESSING AND
COLLECTING OF AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE TAX
YEAR 1999; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL.
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Appraisal District has furnished to the City of
Beaumont the certified tax roll for the City of Beaumont for the tax year 1999; and,
WHEREAS, the net taxable assessed value of all property within the City has been
determined by the Jefferson County Appraisal District as of July 26, 1999 to be
$3,701,491,226; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the tax roll submitted by the Jefferson
County Appraisal District should be accepted and that a tax rate in the amount of $0.635
per each $100 of value for the tax year 1999 should be established based upon said roll;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
Section 1.
That the tax roll submitted to the City Council by the Jefferson County Appraisal
District, a summary of which is attached as Exhibit "A", and showing the total net taxable
assessed value of all property within the City to be $3,701,491,226 is hereby approved
and accepted by the City of Beaumont.
Section 2.
That there shall be and is hereby levied and shall be assessed and collected for the
tax year 1999, for municipal purposes only, an ad valorem tax of $0.635 on each $1b0
worth of property located within the city limits of the City of Beaumont made taxable by law,
which said taxes, when collected, shall be for the purposes hereinafter set forth as follows:
General Fund $0.35
Debt Service Fund $0.285
Section 3.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the
application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances, should for any reason
be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance, and to such end the various portions and provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be severable.
Section 4.
That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the
extent of the conflict only.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the _ day
of , 1999
- Mayor -
8
September 21, 1999
Consider approving a contract for the construction of the Delaware Outfall for the
Concord Road Pavement Widening Project
A. City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
- g
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the award of a contract
for construction of the Delaware Outfall for the Concord Road
Pavement Widening Project Contract HA.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval and execution of a contract with Excavators&Constructors,
Inc. in the amount of $5,024,678.32 for the Delaware Outfall of the Concord Road Pavement
Widening Project Contract IIA. The MBE requirements will be met through sub-contracts with
the certified MBE firms of Bernard Trucking, Texas Mechanical Specialty, Crabtree Barricades
and L. D. Construction for a total of$504,815. This amount represents 10% of the total bid.
Administration recommends authorization to award this contract.
BACKGROUND
On August 16, 1999, the City of Beaumont received six (6) bids for the Delaware Outfall of the
Concord Road Pavement Widening Project Contract HA. The lowest bid was submitted by
Excavators & Constructors, Inc. in the amount of$5,024,678.32. The list below identifies the
total bid received from each contractor:
CONTRACTOR BID
Excavators & Constructors, Inc. $5,024,678.32
Brystar Contracting, Inc. $5,277,718.18
Norman Highway Constructors, Inc. $5,422,537.41
Hart Construction, Inc. $5,642,019.76
ALLCO, Inc. $5,938,673.22
Pate & Pate Enterprises, Inc. $8,153,719.52
A bid tabulation sheet is attached for additional information.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The Engineer's estimated cost of the project prior to the receipt of the bids was $5,200,000 and
funds are available in the Capital Improvement Funds.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing the award of a contract for construction of the Delaware Outfall for the
Concord Road Pavement Widening Project Contract IIA.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BID TAB
J CONCORD ROAD PAVEMENT WIDENING
DELAWARE OUTFALL-CONTRACT 11 A
PAGE 1 OF 6
EXCAVATORS& BRYSTAR NORMAN HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTORS,INC. CONTRACTING,INC. CONSTRUCTORS,INC.
Item jUnit EstImavW -Unit Total --unit Total Unit 1 Total-
No. Code Alt Description Measure Quantity Price Price Price
100 061 PREP ROW 78.28 $448.00 $35,069.44 $2,200.-00 $172,216.00 $2,100.00 $164,3_88.00
-
104 001 REMOV EXISTING CONC(STREET) SY 7,230.00 $4.70 $33,98I.06 $6.00 $43,380.00 $4.50 $32.535.00
104 002 REMOV EXISTING CO_NC(DRIVEWAYS,SLABS,ETC.) SY 3,534.00 $4.95 $17.493.30 $5.00 $17.670.00 $4.50 $15,903.00
EXCAV(RDAn $5.90 $72,233.70 $73.
110 001 CY 12,243.00 $6.50 $79.579.50 $6.00 458.00
162 001 BLOCK SODDING SY 12,000.00 $2.50 $30,000.00 $2.00 $24,000.00 $2.50 $30,000.00
247 001 FL BS(TY A)(GR 1),(CL 2,DC) TNS 8,942.30 $2130 $208,355.59 $18.00 $160.961.40 $22.00 $196,730.60
260 001 LIME SLURRY(7%BY DRY WEIGHT)(TY B)(DC)(6') TNS 772.80 $95.00 $73,416.00 $87.00 $67,233.60 $80.00 $61.824.00
260 002 SUBGRADE LIME TREATMENT SY 33,713.00 $2.00 $67,426.00 $1.50 $50,569.50 $1.80 $60,683.40
310 001 PRIME COAT GAL - 625.00 $2.00 $1.250.00 $2.00 $1,250.00 $2.50 51,562.50
340 001 ASPH CONC&D)(2-) SY 2,491.00 $7.00 $17,437.00 $7.00 $17,437.00 $5.00 $12.455.00
360 001 CONCRETE PAVEMENT(CPJR)(8 IN.)(CLP) SY 21,395.35 $21.50 $460,000.03 $23.50 $502,790.73 $21.00 $449,302.35
360 002 CONCRETE PAVEMENT(CPJR)(6 IN.)(CLP) SY 4.802.00 $20.50 $98,441.00 $20.00 $96.040.00 $18.00 $86,436.00
360 003 6-CONCRETE CURB(TY A)(6-) LF 16,373.601 $1.85 $30,291.16 $2.00 $32,747.20 $2.00 $32.747.20
400 001 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION(TRENCH) CY 46,177.00 $3.40 $157,001.80 $6.50 $300,150.50 $2.00 $92,354.00
400 002 CEMENT STABILIZED SAND(1 1/2 SACK PER C.V.) CY 24,385.00 $20.85 $508,427.25 $20.50 $499,892.50 $20.00 $487,700.00
402 001 TRENCH EXCAV PROTECTION LF 9,280.00 $1.35 $12,528.00 $0.80 $7,424.00 $1.00 $9,280.00
432 001 RIPRAP CGO"C (PL 11) CY - 100.00 $333.00 533,300.00 $200.00 $20.000.00 $275.00 $27.500.00
462 001 CONC BOX SEWER(7 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) LF 1,160.00 $214.50 $248,820.00 $225.00 $261,000.00 $220.00 $255,200.00
462 002 CONC BOX SEWER(8 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) LF 3,259.00 $244.80 $797,803.20 $256.00 $834,304.00 $250.00 $814,750.00
462 003 CONC BOX SEWER
_(9 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) LF 1.004.00 $275.20 5276,300.80 $290.00 $291,160.00 $280.00 $281,120.00
462 004 CONC BOX SEWER(10 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) LF 2,096.00 $318.20 $666,947.20 $320.00 $670,720.00 $300.00 $628,800.00
464 001 1A RC PIPE(SB�111(91_11)(30 IN.) LF 30.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 46.60
464 002 1A RC PIPE(SEWER)(CL 11)(241N.) LF 896.00 $0.00 $0.00 $om $0.00 $0.00- $0.00
464 003 1A RC PIPE(SEWER)(CL 11)(18 IN.) LF 1,157.00 $0.00 $0.00 $O.DO $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
465 001 CURB INLET(TY AJ EA 48.00 $1,350.00 $64,800.00 $1,200.00 $57,600.00 51.900.00 $91,200.00
465 002 JUNCTION BOX WANLET(TY 0) EA 11.00 $1,469.00 $16,159.00 $1,750.00 $19,250.00 $1.300.00 $14,300.00
465 003 JUNCTION BOX(LARGE)(UNDER PAVEMENT) EA 6.00 $9,116.00 $54,696.00 $12.000.00 $72,000.00 $9,000.00 $54,000.00
465 004 JUNCTION BOX(SMALL)_(0UTSIDE PAVEMENT) EA 3.00 $2,849.00 $8,547.00 $1,800.00 $5,400.00 $1.600.00 $4.800.00
465 005 INLET EXTENSION EA 21.00 $561.00 $11,781.00 $ $13,650.00 $500.00 $10,506.00
465 006 PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE RISER EA 5.00 $484.00 $2.420.00 $=.' $4:500.00 $1.000.00 $5.000.00
467 001 SAFETY END TREATMENT EA 8.00 $560.00 $4.480.00 $4800.00 $500.00 $4,000-.00
479 001 ADJUSTING MANHOLES AND INLETS EA 1.00 $450.00 $450.00 $1$=0000 :000.00 $700.00 $70.00
496 001 REMOVING OLD STRUCTURES EA 252.00 $69.00 $17.388.00 $100.00 $25,200.00 $80.00 $20,161-60
500 001 MOBILIZATION LS 1.001 $236,500.00 $236,500.001 $250,000.1 $250,000.661 $520,000.00 $520,000.001
Ilk.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BID TAB
CONCORD ROAD PAVEMENT WIDENING
DELAWARE OUTFALL-CONTRACT II A
PAGE 2 OF 6
EXCAVATORS S BRYSTAR NORMAN HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTORS,INC. CONTRACTING,INC. CONSTRUCTORS,INC.
r - -- . -
Item I Item Unit Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total --
No. _ Code Description Measure Quantity Prica Price Price
502 001 BARRICADES,SIGNS,&TRAF HANDLE MO 18.00 54,010.00 $72,180.00 $1,650.00 $29,700.00 $4,400.00 $79,200.00
508 001 CONSTRUCTION DETOURS(CLASS 3) SY 4,200.00 $5.35' $22,470.00 $1.00 $4,200.00 $3.50 $14,700.00
530 001 DRIVEWAYS(CONCRETE)(6") SY 795.00 $23.35 $18,563.25 $30.00 $23,850.00 $21.00 $16,695.00
530 002 _ DRIVEWAYS(CONCRETE)(4-) SY 4,181.00 $19.75 $82,574.75 $20.00 $83,620.00 $19.00 $79,439.00
531 001 SIDEWALKS LF 6,473.00 59.50 $61,493.50 $9.00 $58,257.00 $17.00 $110,041.00
618 001 CONDUITS(3-) LF 535.00 $4.85 $2,594.75 $8.00 54,280.00 $3.00 $1,605.00
624 001 GROUND BOXES EA 8.00 $115.00 $920.00 $140.00 $1,120.00 $250.00 $2,000.00
666 001 THERMO PAV MRK
(W)(SLD)(4 IN) LF 2,012.00 $1.50 $3,018.00 _ $1.50 $3,018.00 $1.65 $3,319.80
666 002 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(SLD)(12 IN) LF 470.00 _ $4.00 $1,880.00 $4.00 $1,880.00 $4.40 $2,068.00
666 003 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(BRK)(4 IN) _ LF 470.00 $1.00 $470.00 $1.00 $470.00 $1.10 $517.00
666 004 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(SLD)(4 IN) LF 1,447.00 $1.00 $1,447.00 $1.00 $1,447.00 $1.10 $1,591.70
666 005 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(SLD)(4 IN)(DOUBLE) LF 3,581.00 $1.25 $4,476.25 $1.25 $4,476.25 $1.38 _ _ 54,941.78
666 006 THERMO PAV MRK(W)(SLD)(8 IN) LF 986.00 $1.25 $1,232.50 $1.25 $1,232.50 $1.38 $1,360.68
666 007_ __ _ THERMO PAV MRK(W)(SLD)(24 IN) _ LF 438.00 $6.00 $2,628.00 $6.00 $2,628.00 $6.60 $2,890.80
666 008 THERMO PAV MRK(W)(SLD)(12 IN) LF 120.00 _ $4.50 $540.00 54.50 5540.00 $4.95 _ __ $594.00
666 _ 009 THERMO PAV MRK ARROW(W) EA 16.00 $75.00 $1,200.00 575.00 $1,200.00 $82.50 $1,320.00
666 010 THERMO PAV MRK WORD _ _ EA 4.00 $150.00 $600.00 $150.00 $600.00 $165.00 $660.00
672 001 RATS PAV MRKR(TY I-C)_ ) EA 43.00 $4.00 $172.00 $4.00 $172.00 $4.40 $189.20
672 002_ _ RAIS PAV_MRKR(TY II-A-AL- ____ EA 538.00( 00
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS -- --- =- -- =2'152'00 _-- ,- _$4.00 $2,152.00 _ $4.40 52,367.20
5615 001 30 DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52 SANITARY_SEWER _ LF 40.00 5253.00 $16,U6.60 $300.00 $12,000.00 5132.00 55 280.00
5615 002 8 SDR-35 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 5,256.0t) $11.60 560,900 00 _ _ $11.00 $57,750.00 $14.80 $77,700.00
5615 003 6'SDR-35 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 1,174.00 $10.30 $12,092.20 $10.00 $11,740.00 $13.70 $16,083.80
5615 004 8'SDR-26 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 167.00 $15.40 $2,571.80 $12.00 $2,004.00 $16.20 $2,705.40
5615 005 4 SDR-26 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 4,500.00 $13.40 $60,300.00 $9.50 542,750.00 $9.80 $44,100.00
5615_ 006 SERV.LINE CONN.(SERV.T,CO,ADAPTERS) EA 140.00 $118.00 $16,520.00 $125.00 $17,500.00 _ $330.00 546,200.00
5617 001 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EA 24.00 $953.00 $22,87200 $1,200.00 $2.8,800.00 $2,200.00 $52,800.00
6617 002 SANITARY SEWER_CLEANOUT EA 2.00 $129.00 $258.00 __ . $150.00 $300.00 $350.00 $700.00
5617 003 36 STEEL CASING PIPE_________ _- LF 16.001 $51.65 $826.40 _ $75.00 $1,200.00 $75.001 $1,200.00
5617 004 12 STEEL CASING PIPE _ LF $27.55 $1,102.00 -- $40.00 $1,600:00 538.001 $1,520.00
WATER UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS-- - --.--40.00j_________-- _-
5613 001 I12 PVC WATER MAIN(C 900)(DR-18)(CL 150) _ LF 7 4,M-.00-1 521.60 $92,080.80 $22.00 $93,786.00 $24.00 $102,312.00
5613 002 _ _ 18 PVC WATER MAIN(C 900)(DR-18)(CL 150) LF I 2,770.00 $13.85 $38,364.50 $13.00 $36,010.00 $16.00 $44,320.00
5613 003 6-PVC WATER MAIN(C-900)(DR-18)(CL 150) LF 2,656.00 $10.85 $28,817.60 $11.00 $29,216.00 $13.00 $34,528.00
r
Ilk
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BID TAB
CONCORD ROAD PAVEMENT WIDENING
DELAWARE OUTFALL-CONTRACT 11 A
PAGE 3 OF 6
EXCAVATORS& BRYSTAR NORMAN HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTORS,INC. CONTRACTING,INC. CONSTRUCTORS,INC.
-- -- _. ta
Item Item Unit Estimated Unit Total Unit Tol Unit Total -
'
No. Cods Description Measure Quantity Pr_a Price Price
5613 004 _ 2"PVC WATER MAIN(SDR PR-26)(CL 160) LF 601.00 _ $8.50 $5,108.50 _ $5.50 $3,305.50 $5.00 $3,005.00
5613 005 2"STEEL CASING FOR WATER_ SERV.UNDER PVMT. LF_ 3,350.00 $3.80 $12,730.00 $3.00 _ $10,050.00 $4.00 $13,400.00
5618 001 _ 12'AWWA GATE VALVE EA 17.00 $993.00 $16,881.00 $1,250.00 $21,250.00 $1,100.00 $18,700.00
5618 _ 002 _ 8"AWWA GATE VALVE _ EA 7.00 $535.00 $3,745.00 $660.00 _ 54,620.00 $740.00 _$5,180.00
5618 003 6-AWWA GATE VALVE _ EA 12.00 $346.00 $4,152.001 $460.00$ $5,520.001 $430.00 $5,160.00
5618 004 2-CORPORATION STOP - EA 10.00 $128.00 $1,280.00 $15000 $1,500.001 $550.00 $5,500.00
...5619 _ 001 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EA.-_ __. 12.00 $1,716.00 _. _ _$20,592_.00__-___f1,80o00 $21,600,0052200.001 $_26,406.00
EROSION CONTROL_
5007 001 BALED HAY FOR EROSN.S SEDT.CNTRL.(INSTALD) EA 50.00 $6.50 $325.00 _ $1.00 55060 $10.00 ua oO
5007 002 __ BALED HAY FOR ERSN BSEDT CNTRL(REMVSREPLC) EA 50.00 $7.45 $372.50 $160 $50.00 $15.00 $750.00
5007 003 I BALED HAY FOR EROSN.8 SEDT.CNTRL(REMV) EA 50.00 $1.20 $60.00 $1.12 $56.00 $5.00 $250.00
5009 001 TEMP.SEDMNT CNTRL(FENCE)(INSTALLED) LF 10000.00 $0.50 $5,000.00 $0.01 $100.00 $0.01 $100.00
5009 002 TEMP.SEDMNT CNTRL(FENCE)(REM V&REPLACE) LF 10000.00 $0.60 $6,000.00 $6.01 $100.00 $0.01 $100.00
5009 003 .}__ TEMP SEDMNT CNTR�ENCE)(REMOVE) _ LF __ 10,000.00 $0.10 _ $1,000 00 $0 01 $100,00 $0,01 $100_00
ALTERN_A_T_E 1B _
460 001 18 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE(ALUMINIZED STL)(30) co 30.00 50.00 $6 00 $0 661-
00 $6.00 moo $0.00
460 002 183 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE(ALUMINIZED STL)(24') LF 896.00 $0.00 $0.00 50 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
460 1 003
__I 181CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ALUMINIZED STL)(18.1 l LF I 1 157001 $0.00
so oa so.00 So.00 so.00 s000
ALTERNATE 1C - ..._.. -
-.
4025 . 001 1C THERMOPLASTIC PIPE(CPP-TY S)(30') _-..._.. --_........--..LF _ - 30.00 - - $36.85 _ $1,105.50 $30.00 - $900.00 - $40.00
-- �51 200.00
4025_ 002 1C THERMOPLASTIC_PIPE(CPP-TY S)(24') LF 896.00 $29.20 $26,163.20 $24.50 $21,952.00 $25.00 $22,400.00
4025 003 1C THERMOPLASTIC PIPE(CPP-TY S)(18') LF 1,157.00 $25.05 $28,982.85 $20.00 $23,140.00 $22.00 $25,454.00
TOTAL COST - - I -
$4,891,563.82 $5,204,592.68 $5,288,352.41
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BID TAB
CONCORD ROAD PAVEMENT WIDENING
DELAWARE OUTFALL-CONTRACT II A
PAGE 4 OF 6
HART PATE 6 PATE
CONSTRUCTION,INC. ALLCO,INC. ENTERPRISES,INC.
Item Item Unit Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Code Alt Description l Measure Quantity_ Price Price Price
100 001 PREP ROW STA 78.28 $250.00 $19,570.00 $449.57 535,19234 $4,500.00 $352,260.00
104 001 _ REMOV EXISTING CONC(STREET) SY 7,230.00 _
_ _.-- _ 55.00 -336,150.00 $6.00 $43,360.00 -$7.80 _ $56394.00
104 002 REMOV EXISTING CONC(DRIVEWAYS,SLABS,ETC.) SY 3,534.00 $5.00 $17,670.00 $6.00 $21,204.00 $8.10 $28,625.40
110 001 EXCAV(RDWY)-_- _ - CY 12,243.00 _ $4.75 - - $58,154.25 $7.06 $86,435.58 $11.50 4140-,794.50_
162 001 BLOCK SODDING_ SY 12,000.00 $2.50 $30,000.00 $2.94 $35,280.00 $3.00 $36,000.00
247 001 FL BS(TY A)(GR 1),(CL 2,DC) TNS 8,942.30 $24.00 $214,615.20 $20.04 $179,203.69 $26.30 $235,182.49
260 _ 001 LIME SLURRY(7%BY DRY WEIGHT)(TY B)(DC)(6-) TNS 772.80 $102.00 $78,825.60 _ $94.75 __ $73,222.80 $110.00 _ $85,008.00
260 002 SUBGRADE LIME TREATMENT SY 33,713.00 $2.20 $74,168.60 $2.71 $91,362.23 $2.70 $91,025.10
310 001 PRIME COAT GAL 625.00 $2.00 $1,250.00 $2.25 $1,406.25 $2.50 $1,562.50
340 001 ASPHCONC D Y SY 2,491.00 - _ -- -
- _ _ � �L) _ _._ __ _. _ $4.60 571.458.60 _ _56 60 __-- $16,440.60 $9.00 _-522,419.00
360 001 CONCRETE PAVEMENT-(CPJR)(81N.)(CLP) SY 21,395.35 $23.30 _ $498,511.66 $22.00 $470,697.70 $27.50 $588,372.13
360 _ 002 CONCRETE PAVEMENT JCP_JR)(6 IN.)(CLP) SY 4,802.00 $20.70 $99,401.40 $20.00 __ $96,040.00 _$24.10 _ __5115,12820
360 003 6'CONCRETE CURB A 6" LF 16,37160 $2.20_ $36,021.92 $3.00 $49,120.80 52.50__ __ $40,934.00
400 001 EXCAVATION(TRENCH) CY 46,177.00 $4.75 $219,340.75 $0.01 - $461.77 - $2.50 $115,442.50
400 002 CEMENT STABILIZED SAND(1 1/2 SACK PER C.Y.) CY 24,385.00 $23.80 _ _ $580.363.00 $20.00 $487,700.00 $23.00 $560,855.00
402 001 TRENCH EXCAV PROTECTION LF 9,280.00 $1.00 $9,280.00 $0.01 $92.80 $4.00 $37,120.0_0
432 001 RIPRAP(CONC)(qL II)____ CY 100.00 $278.00 527,806.00 - 9321.36 - $32,136.00 $307.00- -- $30,700.00
462 001_ CONC BOX SEWER(7 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850)_ LF 1,160.00 $241.00 $279,560.00 _ $316.43 $367,058.80 $355.00 $411,11M.00
462 002 CONC BOX SEWER(8 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) LF_ 3,259.00 $260.00 _ $847,340.00 _ $340.12 S_1,108,451.08 $405.00 $_1,319,895.00
462 003 CONC BOX SEWER(9 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) LF 1,004.00 $311.00 $312,244.00 $369.04 $370,516.16 $440.00 $441,760.00
462 004- - - CONC BOX SEWER(10 FT x 5 FT)(TYPE C-850) _ LF 2,096.00 $348.00 _ $729,408.00 $399.34 - $837,016.64 $490.00 $1,_027,040.00
464 001 to RC PIPE(SEWER)CCL I10(30 IN.) LF 30.00 $0.00 $0.00 __ $0.00 $0.00 $61.50_ _ _ _ 51 845.00
464 002 1A RC PIPE(SEWER)(CL II)(24 IN.) LF 896.00 $0.00 30.00 $0.00 $0.00 $57.00 $51 072.00
464 003 1_A RC PIPE(SEWER)(CL II)(18 IN.) - LF _ 1,157.00 $0.00 $0.00 _ $0.00 - $0.00 _ - $51.00 _ $59,007.00
465 001_ CURB INLET(TY A) _ EA -_ 48.00 $1,400.00 $67,200.00 _ $2,000.00 $96,000.00 $3,200.00 $153,600.00
465 002 JUNCTION BOX W/INLET(TY B) EA 11.00 $1,400.00 $15,400.00 $1,715.00 $18,865.00 $6,700.00 $73,700.00
465 003 JUNCTION BOX(LARGE)(UNDER PAVEMENT) EA 6.00 $7,200.00 $43,200.00 _ _ $15,821.00 $94,926.00 $11,000.00 __ $66,000.00
465 004_ JUNCTION BOX(SMALL)(OUTSIDE PAVEMENT_) EA 3.00 51,300.00 $3,900.00 $1,465.00 - $4,395.00 $2,600.00 $7,800.00
465 005 INLET EXTENSION EA :3 Xi 5500.00 $10,500.00 $600.00 $12,600.00 $600.00 _ $1.2,600.00
465 006 PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE RISE_R EA 5.00 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 $1,050.00 _ $5,250.00 $120.00 $600.00
467 001 SAFETY END TREATMENT EA 8.00 $400.00 $3,200.00 $550.001_ $4,400.00 $520.00 $4,160.00
479 001 ADJUSTING MANHOLES AND INLETS EA 1.00 $350.00 $350.00 _ $300.00 $300.00 $180.00 5180.00
496 001 REMOVING OLD STRUCTURES EA 252.00 $250.00 $63,000.00 $1.00 $252.00 $250.00 $63,000.00
500 I _001 MOBILIZATION___ ___ _ LS i 1.00 $480,000.00 $480.000.001 $579,913.001._ _ $579,913.001 $660,000.00 $660.000.00
F
i
I
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BID TAB
CONCORD ROAD PAVEMENT WIDENING
DELAWARE OUTFALL-CONTRACT II A
PAGE 5 OF 6
HART PATE 8 PATE - -
CONSTRUCTION,INC. ALLCO,INC. ENTERPRISES,INC.
Item Item Unit Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. __ Coda Description Measure Quantity--',",--'-', Price Price Price
502 001 BARRICADES,SIGNS,8 TRAF HANDLE MO _ _ 18.00 $4,500.00 $81,000.00 $4,006.00 _ 572,108.00 $6,000.00 _ $108,000.00
508 001 CONSTRUCTION DETOURS(CLASS 3) SY 4,200.00 $9.00 $37,800.00 $12.03 $50,526.00 $10.00 $42,000.00
530 001 _ DRIVEWAYS(CONCRETE)(6-) SY 795.00 $21.00 $16,695.00 $20.00 $15,900.00 $35.00 _ $27,825.00
530 002 DRIVEWAYS(CONCRETE)(4-) SY_ 4,181.00 $19.00 $79,439.00 _ $17.00 $71,077.00 $32.00 __ $133,792.00
531 001 SIDEWALKS LF 6,473.00 $10.001 $64,730.00 $8.16 $52,819.68 $15.00 $97,095.00
618 001 CONDUITS(3-) LF 535.00 $6.00 $3,210.00 $3.77 $2,016.95 $11.50 $6,152.50
624 001 GROUND BOXES EA 8.00 $200.00 $1,600.00 $300.00 $2,400.00 $250.00 $2,000.00
666 001 _ THERMO PAV MRK(W)(SLD)(41N) LF 2,012.00 $1.50 $3,018.00 _ _ _ $1.50 $3,018.00 $1.70 $3,420.40
666 002 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(SLD)(12 IN) LF 470.00 $4.00i $1,880.00 $4.00 $1,880.00 $4.50 $2,115.00
666 003 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(BRK)(4 IN) LF 470.00 $1.00 $470.00 _ _ $1.00 $470.00 $1.20 $564.00
666 004 _ THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(SLD)(4 IN) LF 1,447.00 $1.00 $1,447.00 _ _ $1.00 _ __ $1,447.00 $1.20 $1,736.40
666 005 THERMO PAV MRK(Y)(SLD)(4 IN)(DOUBLE) LF 3,581.00 $1.25 $4,476.25 $1.25 $4,476.25 $1.50 $5,371.50
666 006 THERMO PAV MRK(W)(SLD)(8 IN) - LF 986.00 $1.25 $1,232.50 _ $1.25 $1,232.50_ $1.50 - $1,479.00
666 007 THERMO PAV MRK(W)(SLD)(24 IN) LF 438.00 $6.00 $2,628.00 $6.00 $2,628.00 $6.80 _ $2,978.40
..666 008__ THERMO PAV MRK_M(SLD)(12 IN) __ _ LF 120.00 $4.50 $540.00 ._ _ $4.50 $540.00 $5.50 $660.00
666 009 _ THERMO PAV MRK ARROW(W) - _ EA 16.00 $75.00 $1,200.00 $75.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 $1,600.00
666 . 010_ -__ THERMO PAV MRK WORD(W) EA 4.00 $150.00 $600.00 $150.00 $600.00 $180.00 $726.00
672 _ 001 RATS PAV MRKR jTY I-C)__- EA 43.00 _ $4.00 $172.00 - _ _-$4.00. $172.00 $5.00 _ $215.00
672_- _002__ RAIS PAV MRKR(TY II-A-A) _ EA _ 538.00 54.00-._.-__ -$2,152.00-, $4.00 $2,152.001_______ 0- $2,690.00
SANITA_RY_ SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
- --._._._ - - -._.._... ---- --
5615 _ 001 _ 30_'DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52 SANITARY SEWER LF _ 40.00 $72.00 $2,880.00 $80.00 53,200.00 5150.00 $6,000.00
- - - - - , -
5615 002 8-SDR-35 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 5,250.00 $10.20 $53,550.00 $10.22 $53,655.00 $21.50 $112,875.00
5615 003 W SDR-35 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 1,174.00 $9.40 $11,035.60 $9.36 $10,988.64 $20.00 $23,480.00
5615 604 W SDR-26 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 167.00 _ ___ _ $11.75 $1,962.25 $11.45 $1,912.15 _ $22.50 $3,757.50
5615 005 4-SDR-26 PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 4,500.00 $8.75 $39,375.00 $7.05 $31,725.00 $15.50 $69,750.00
5615 006 SERV.LINE CONNSSERV.-1-,CO,ADAPTERS) EA 140.00 $210.00 $29,400.00 $115.00 $16,100.00 $220.00 $30,800.00
5617 001 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EA 24.00 $1,500.00 $36,000.00 $1,350.00 _ $32,400.00 $1,200.00 $28,800.00
5617 602_ SANITARY SEWERCLEANOUT - --_ . _-- _ EA_ _ 2.00 $250.00 __ - $500.00 -- $150.00 - $300.00 $220.00 $440.00
5617 003_ _ 36'STEEL CASING PIPE - LF 16.00 $38.00 - $608.00 $50.00 $800.00 $84.00 $1.344.00
_--
5617 004 12'S TEEL CASING PIPE LF 40.00 $24.00 $960.00 $30.00 $1,200.00 573.00 $2,920.00
WATER UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS __ _
5613 001 - PVC WATER MAIN(C-900)(OR-18)(CL 150 _ LF 4 263.00 $19.20_ 581 849.60 - $16 70 _ 571,192.10 $34.00f-
34.00 $144 942.00
5613 002 8-PVC WATER MAIN(C-900)(DR-18)(CL 150) LF 2,770.00 $12.50 $34,625.00 $10.91 $30,220.70 $25.00 $69,250.00
5613 003-�-_ 112*
6-PVC WATER MAIN(C-900)(DR-18)(CL 150) LF 2,656.00 $10.481 $27,834.88 $8.67 $23,027.52 $20.001 $53,120.00
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BID TAB
CONCORD ROAD PAVEMENT WIDENING
DELAWARE OUTFALL-CONTRACT 11 A
PAGE 6 OF 6
HART - __
PATE&PATE
CONSTRUCTION,INC. ALLCO,INC. ENTERPRISES,INC.
_----- --
Item Item Unit Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Code Description Measure Quantity Price Price Price
5613 004 2-PVC WATER MAIN(SDR PR-26)(CL 160) LF 601.00 $5.20 53,125.20 $4.65 $2,914.85 $14.00 _ _ $8,414.00
5613 005 _ 2'STEEL CASING FOR WATER SERV.UNDER PVMT. LF 3,350.00 $4.00 $13,400.00 $2.20 _ $7,370.00 $15.00 $50,250.00
5618 001 12-AWWA GATE VALVE EA 17.00 $1,090.00 $18,530.00 $1,340.00 $22,780.00 $950.00 $16,150.00
5618 002 8'AWWA GATE VALVE EA 7.00 5680.00 $4,760.00 5800.00 $5,600.00 $520.00 $3,640.00
5618 t 003 6'AW WA GATE VALVE EA 12.00 $540.00 $6,480.00 $570.00 $6,840.00 $480.00 $5,760.00
5618 I 004 2'CORPORATION STOP EA 10.00 $250.00 $2 500.00 $300.00 $3,000.00 $100.00 $1000.00
5619 , 001 _ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EA_ __ __-12_00 $1,730.00 520,760._- 51,950.001_ 523,400.00 57,600.00 $19,200.00
EROSION CONTROL_ _
--w.95
5007 001 BALED HAY FOR EROSN.8 SEDT.CNTRL(INSTALD) EA 50.00 55.00 $250.00 _ $897.51 510.00 $500.00
5007 002 BALED HAY FOR ERSN.BSEDT CNTRL(REMVBREPLC) EA 50.00 55.00 $250.00 $19.71 5985.50 $100 __ ___ _ 5750.00
5007 003 _ _ BALED HAY FOR EROSN.8 SEDT.CNTRL(REMV) EA 50.00 _ $3.00 5150.00 $12.30 _ 5615.00 53.00 5150.00
5009 001 TEMP.SEDMNT CNTRL(FENCE)(INSTALLED) LF 10,000.00 $1.10 $11,000.00 $1.25 $12,500.00 $1.50 __$15 000.00
--
5009 002 TEMP.SEDMNT CNTRL(FENCE)(REMV&REPLACE) I LF 10,000.00 $1.50 $15,000.00 $1.75 $17,500.00 $0.60 $6,000.00
5009 1 003 TEMP:SEDMNT CNTRL$FENCE)(REMOVE) LF 10,000.00 $0.50 $5 000.00 $0.75 $7,500.00 $0.60 $6000.60
ALTERNATEIB - -
_._
460 001 1B CORRUGATED METAL PIPE(ALUMINIZED STL)(30') LF 30.00 $0.00 $0.00F 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $0 00
460 002 16 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ALUMINIZED STL 24-) LF 896.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000
460 003 1B CORRUGATED METAL PIPE(ALUMINIZED STL)(18-) - �- LF I 1 157_OOl _ SOHO( $0.00 _ 50.00, _ $O.00I $0.00( _ SO 00
ALTERNATEIC
--
4025 -001 1C THERMOPLASTIC PIPE(CPP-TY Si-(30") LF --30.00( 531.50 $945.00 537 27 $11118.10 $77.00 t2,31-0.00-
4025 002 1C THERMOPLASTIC PIPE(CPP-TY S)(24') LF 896.00 $22.00 $19,712.00 _ $24.87 $22,283.52 $71.00 $63,616.00
4025 003 1C THERMOPLASTIC PIPE(CPP-TY S)(18') LF l 1,157.00 $18.50 $21,404.50
$17.86 $20,664.02 $65.00 $75,205.00
_
I _
� (I
}TOTAL COST - - {
__ __-- --_ _ $5,483,404.58 _ $5,777,374.37 _. . $7,925.265.52
CITY OF BEAUMONT
SCHEDULE OF MBE PARTICIPATION
(SCHEDULE C)
Date of Rgmn
Department
Projecl No.
Location
1X►VAIIlRS & 036ML11m, DC. Percent Complete
Talal Contract Amowq S
Name of Prime Caahactcr114oposea
,trt
z
Be klw 3840 Wm, p9m
I. ,
0
V) M±zrdcal altv Bit 7523, Beautio'1t, rl% fterials — ------
18%4Ds00 - - -
Z?( &stdplm 97964.00
148 S. Davlen ib3. 46694
w L8 .00
792.00
0
a
mle u>tidcrsigoed wW toter into•formal agt+ament with MBE Coatmlwl fax walk listed in this adWule conditioned upon execution of a cantracl wish the City of Be ont.
J4 NOM 1. Any business Usted above must have Schedule A on flee with the Qty, ,
AD 2. Schedule C is to be induded with bid,snd resubmated at 50%and 10096 of project completion. , I
LA
i
Signature /
A Title
i
30 rw10 Fom ScberC.tt207.93
I . ,
9
September 21, 1999
Consider authorizing the Mayor to approve the proposed IH-10 Frontage Roads
Project schematic
City of Beaumont
II]•
- Council Agenda Item
TO: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Director of Public Works
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 9, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council authorize the Mayor to approve the proposed IH-10 Frontage
Roads Project schematic. The limits of the project are from Walden
Road to FM 364 (Major Drive).
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval of the IH-10 Frontage Roads Project schematic and
authorization for the Mayor to approve the schematic for the City.
BACKGROUND
The Texas Department of Transportation(TxDOT),Jefferson County and the City of Beaumont have
agreed in principle to participate in the construction of frontage roads on IH-10 between Walden
Road and Major Drive. The entities would participate on a one-third basis in the cost of constructing
the frontage roads. The County has also indicated they would be responsible for the preliminary
engineering,feasibility studies and any other studies required to prepare the plans,specifications and
estimates and construction letting support documents. As a part of the preliminary engineering, the
County has prepared a schematic for the IH-10 Frontage Roads. The schematic will be submitted
to the Federal Highway Administration for approval. Authorization for the Mayor to approve the
schematic is being requested since the formal agreement among the three entities has not been
executed. The engineers estimate to construct the frontage roads is $11,400,000. Based on this
estimate, the anticipated cost to the City is $3,800,000.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Although approval of the schematic will not have a budgetary impact, this action will signify a
commitment to the project. Also, a delegation from Beaumont will be attending the September
meeting of the TxDOT Commission requesting additional funding for this project. If additional
funding is received, the City's share will be reduced.
Page 1 of 2
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
The agreement is currently being reviewed by the entities involved and will be submitted to City
Council for approval in the next thirty to sixty days.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager,Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/deny the administrative recommendation to approve the the IH-10 Frontage Roads Project
schematic and authorize the Mayor approve the schematic for the City.
Page 2 of 2
10
September 21, 1999
Consider approving a five-year financing agreement for the purchase of a Pierce
Lance Fire Pumper
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda
� = • � Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Central Services Director
MEETING DATE: September 14, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 8, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a resolution to award a bid for a financing
agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends award of a bid for a five year financing agreement with a fixed
interest rate of 5.29% to Banc One Leasing Corporation for the purchase of a Pierce Lance Fire
Pumper.
BACKGROUND
Two bids were received for a fixed interest rate for financing the purchase of one Pierce Lance
1,500 gallon per minute fire pumper. The purchase of the fire pumper was authorized by Council
on December 15, 1998 at a cost of$316,928.99. The fire pumper was delivered and accepted by
the City on August 17,1999. Bids were requested for a fixed interest rate to finance the total cost
for five years with the first annual payment in arrears.
The two bids received are as follow:
Financial Institution Location Interest Rate
Banc One Leasing Corporation Corsicana, TX 5.29%
Associates Commercial Corporation Irving, TX 5.46%
Financing Agreement
September 8, 1999
Page 2
BUDGETARY IMPACT
An amortization schedule indicating the cost of the financing agreement is as follows:
Payment No. Payment Amount Interest Principal Purchase Option
1 $73,790.42 $16,765.54 $57,024.88 $264,264.75
2 $73,790.42 $13,748.93 $60,041.49 $202,562.90
3 $73,790.42 $10,572.73 $63,217.69 $138,038.56
4 $73,790.42 $ 7,228.52 $66,561.90 $70,562.59
5 $73,790.42 $ 3,707.39 $70,083.03 -0-
TOTAL $368,952.10 $52,023.11 $316,928.99
The City's Finance Officer compared the cost of financing the equipment purchased to the cost
of paying for the equipment in full. In the past, savings have been realized from this type of
arrangement. Based on the current investment rates, the City would earn $51,043 over the term
of the agreement resulting in a potential net borrowing cost of$979.
The first annual payment of$73,790.42 will be due one year after execution of the agreement.
PREVIOUS ACTION
The purchase of the fire pumper was authorized by Council on December 15, 1998 at a cost of
$316,928.99.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
The City Manager, Finance Officer and Central Services Director.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny a resolution accepting a bid from Banc One Leasing Corporation for a five year
financing agreement with a fixed interest rate of 5.29% for the purchase of one Pierce Lance fire
pumper.
1�X�i
To: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager low
From: Beverly P. Hodges, Finance Officer c
Date: Thursday,September 2, 1999
Subject: Lease Purchase Financing
The City has accepted delivery of a Fire Pumper Truck costing $316,928.99 for which
lease purchase financing is available. The lowest quoted interest rate is a fixed rate of
5.29% for five years in arrears which was received from Banc One Leasing Corp. Group
to finance (Municipal Lease Purchase) the purchase of the truck.
If the City invested the purchase price of the truck at our current yield we would earn
$81,678. The cost of interest to finance the purchase of the equipment is projected at
$52,022. Since we will be making annual payments on the lease purchase, we must
factor in the annual payment as a reduction in the cash available for investment. As a
result we would earn $51,043 over the term of the lease purchase which is a net
interest cost of $979 and would retain the use of our money for the length of the
financing.
Purchase out of current Net cost from investment
funds (loss of the use of of current funds and Lease
funds) Purchase financing
($81,111) $979
It is my recommendation that we use the Municipal Lease Purchase, which would allow
us the flexibility of keeping an adequate fund balance and realize the benefit of a net
borrowing cost of $979 on the purchase of a long-term fixed asset relative to the
payment schedule of the financing.
11
September 21, 1999
Consider approving an agreement between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Railway Company and the City of Beaumont to widen and improve the grade
crossing on Walden Road
City of Beaumont
• Council Agenda It
M �_ g em
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 9, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution to enter into an agreement between
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and City
of Beaumont to widen and improve the grade crossing on Walden
Road.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends the execution of an agreement between The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company and the City of Beaumont in the amount of$142,582 to widen and
improve the railway crossing at Walden Road.
BACKGROUND
As part of the Walden Road Pavement Widening Project the existing railway crossing needs to
be widened and signalized to match the new pavement.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The total amount of$142,582 would be paid from Capital Improvement Funds.
PREVIOUS ACTION
The City entered into an agreement with The Burlington and Santa Fe Railway Company to
maintain the storm sewer facility installed within the railway right-of-way parallel to the tract on
Walden Road.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing an agreement between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway
Company and City of Beaumont to widen and improvement the railway crossing on Walden Road.
12
September 21, 1999
Consider approving a three-year contract for long term disability insurance
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Karen Satterly, Employee Benefits Coordinator
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consideration of a three year contract for Long Term
Disability insurance.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends that the long term disability contract be awarded to the current carrier,
Prudential Insurance Company of America for three years effective January 1, 2000. Prudential will
provide the same level of long term disability benefits that are currently in effect and the long term
disability benefit cost will remain the same for the employees.
BACKGROUND
The City received proposals from three insurance companies for Long Term Disability insurance on
August 9, 1999. The companies that submitted proposals were Hartford Life, Prudential Insurance
Company of America, and Group Life & Health Insurance Company (Blue Cross Blue Shield).
Another proposal was submitted by Standard Insurance Company, however, the rates were
inadvertently omitted from the proposal. A copy of the proposal comparison is attached.
Long term disability is offered to Police and Civilian employees only with approximately 580 or 51%
of the eligible employees participating. This benefit will provide the employee with up to 60% of his
or her salary when disabled for a period in excess of 90 days.
The apparent low bidder was Hartford Life, however, the proposal did not meet the total benefits
specifications. The next lowest bidder which met the City's specifications was Prudential. Prudential
offers an enhanced program which includes worksite modification, a child care program, etc. in an
effort to get the employee back to work.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
Long term disability insurance is an optional benefit offered to Police and Civilian employees. There
is no monetary impact to the City because premiums are withheld from participating employees'
paychecks to pay for the long term disability insurance coverage. To date (8/99), the employees
have paid premiums of$71,174.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Human Resources Director
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny awarding a three year contract to Prudential Insurance Company of America for Long
Term Disability insurance.
KFS C:\OFFICE\WPWIMWIPDOCS\LTim-2.wPD
Long Term Disability Company Comparison
Prudential Hartford Group Life & Health
Insurance Company
Age Bands Rate per 100 Rate per 100 %of Payroll
Age 40 or less .43 .40 .39% of Payroll
Age 41 -49 1.06 1.00 .98%of Payroll
Age 50+ 1.33 1.32 1.22%of Payroll
Contract Terms 3 Years 2 Years 2 Years
Composite Rate 80 % None None
Best Rating A A+ None
Proposal Meets Specifications Yes Exceptions: Exceptions:
• If employee participation at • %of Payroll
lower level,then will • Survivor benefits limited to
adjust quote. 3 months vs. 6 months
• Diagnosis &prognosis • Requires 50% enrollment
cannot be provided with • Current contract's standard
reports minimum benefit is 15%,
• Does not agree with whereas bidder's standard
performance guarantees minimum benefit is 10%
• Pre-existing condition is • Not willing to waive
6/12 actively at work provision
• Mandatory Rehabilitation
Note: Standard Insurance Company submitted package with no rates.
* Blue Cross Blue Shield
IRS C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\CONTRACT.BID\BIDCOMPA\LTD2.WPD 9/14/99
13
August 31, 1999
Consider the handling of third party workers' compensation claims
Cit y of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Glenda E. Lundy, Human Resources Director
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consideration of the handling of third party workers'
compensation claims.
RECOMIlVIENDATION
Administration recommends that City Council provide the City Manager or his designee with the
authority to initiate lawsuits and settle third parry workers' compensation claim. All third party
workers' compensation claims presented for lawsuits and settlement must be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney's office.
BACKGROUND
Recovering funds from vehicular accidents or injuries involving third party workers' compensation
claims has been an issue for the City's administration over the last ten years. Seventeen workers'
compensation claims have remained open with the oldest claim dating back to 1993. Total amount
paid as a result of these claims is approximately $537,000. To date, $77,700 has been recovered
and staff is anticipating receipt of $25,000 in the next couple of weeks, thus reducing the open
claims to fifteen(see attachment). In many cases, the City will not recover the total amount spent
due to settlement negotiations and/or policy limits. However, the monies that are recovered will
be returned to the workers' compensation line item providing a more favorable experience. Staff
is aggressively attempting to recover at least two-thirds or the policy limits, whichever is
appropriate, of the monies spent on such claims.
BUDGETARY HA4PACT
The recovery of monies spent during prior years will reduce the City's liability and/or loss ratio.
All monies received will be considered as revenue unless monies are received in the same year as
the injury or accident.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Council provided approval for administration to settle two third party workers' compensation
claims in the amounts of $77,700 and $25,000 by Resolution Numbers 99-207 and 99-183
respectively. One of the claims involved medical malpractice while the other was a vehicular
accident.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Human Resources Director
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/deny authority to the City Manager or his designee to initiate lawsuits and settle claims
involving third party workers' compensation claims.
c:99agend
City of Beaumont
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09114[99
Page 1 of 9
DATE OF CG4IM LAST FIRST BQRY CAUSE DEPARTMENT A .OUNT RESERVE TYPE OF mom
INJURY NUMBER NAME NAME PART
PAID CEAIhf
INJURY as of as of
08/31/99 691-41109
05109f97 BM500530 Williams Sean Hands Caught Clean $185,419 $24,637 3rd Party Law Sean Williams and his wife Roberta
between Community Suit Williams filed a law suit with Scranton
garbage Manufacturing Co., Inc. (manufacture
packer defect) and is represented by James E.
Payne of Provost*Umphrey Law Firm.
Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo Er
Freeman, L.L.P. filed a petition in
intervention for the City on June 14,
1999. Don Lighty will handle this case
on a 25% contingency recovery basis
(plus expenses).
05101198 BM500732 Barton Patrick Multiple MVA Police $49,834 $6,261 3rd Party Law Patrick W. Barton and his wife Sheila
body Department Suit Barton filed a law suit with Williams
Medic-Aid EMS and is represented by
Glen W. Morgan of Reaud, Morgan &
Quinn, Inc. Don Lighty with Stevens,
Baldo Er Freeman, LLP.filed a petition
in intervention for the City on August
23, 1999. Don Lighty will handle this
case on a 25% contingency recovery
basis (plus expenses).
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09(14[99
,
Page 2 of 9
RATE OF CLAIM LAST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT RESERYE TYPE.OF NOTES:,
INJURY NUMBER NAME NAME PART PAID. ClAl1N
INJURY'. as of as of
681:3I J99 08/31 f99
02121/99 BM500907 Chadney Jeffery Knee MVA Police $11,959 $4,802 Recovery of Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo $
Department workers ' Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
compensation Mark Hebert for the City on August 21,
benefits and 1999. Demand was made for
medical paid $11,959.49 to recover medical expenses
out due to the and indemnity workers' compensation
r e c k l e s s benefits. This demand was due to the
driving of reckless driving that caused injury to
Mark Hebert. Jeffrey Chadney as he was attempting
to apprehend Mark Hebert. If there is
no response, then we will ask council
for permission to handle this matter
through the courts. Don Lighty will
handle this case on a 25%contingency
recovery basis (plus expenses).
06126196 BM500371 Clark Isaac Back MVA Police $35,096 $47,975 3rd Party Law This case settled for policy limits and
Department Suit did not consider the subrogated rights
of the City. We collected nothing. Don
Lighty is seeking recovery and has filed
suit with Ivan P.Jones and Debbie A.
Clay. Ivan P. Jones has filed a
counterclaim against Isaac Clark and a
third party petition against Jesse
Funchess,attorney for Isaac Clark. Don
Lighty will handle this case on a 25%
contingency recovery basis (plus
expenses).
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09/14/99
Page 3 of 9
DATE OF CLAIM LOST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AM
O(!NT RESERVE TYPE OF NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAME NAME PART PAID CLAIM
INJURY as of as of.
08/31/99 Q8/31�9'I
06102/98 BM500745 Jardine Lisa Lower MVA Police $2,546 $4,001 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo &r
Arm Department adjuster, Mr. Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
C.D.Williams / Shrishkymar K. Patel and his insurance
State Farm company,State Farm Insurance,for the
Insurance. City on August 21, 1999. Demand was
made for$2,546.86 to recover medical
expenses the City paid out. This
demand was due to a vehicle accident
involving Mr. Patel and our employee,
Lisa ,Jardine. If there is no response,
then we will ask council for permission
to handle this matter through the
courts. Don Lighty will handle this
case on a 25`36 contingency recovery
basis (plus expenses).
06/04198 BM500767 Mack James Back MVA Police $1,228 $1,271 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo Er
Department adjuster, Ms. Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
D e b o r a h Michael Hankins and his insurance
F a n n i n g, company,Dairyland County Mutual,for
Dairy 1 a n d the City on August 21, 1999. Demand
C o u n t y was made for $1,28.40 to recover
M u t u a l medical expenses the City paid out.
Insurance. This demand was due to a vehicle
accident involving Mr. Hankins and our
employee, James Mack. If there is no
response, then we will ask council for
permission to handle this matter
through the courts. Don Lighty will
handle this case on a 25%contingency
recovery basis(plus expenses).
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09/14/99
Page 4of9
DATE OF CLAIM LAST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT RESERVE TYPE OF, NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAME NAME ' PART PAID CLAIIN
INJURY as of As of
08131:109 48/31/0.
07107198 BM500767 Moree Green Knee MVA Police $12,805 $16,835 (Hit and Run) Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo iar
Department Vesta County Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
M u t u a I Mr.Thomas McDowell and his insurance
Insurance company,Vesta County Mutual,for the
City on August 21, 1999. Demand was
made for $12,805.29 to recover
medical expenses and indemnity
benefits the City paid out. This
demand was due to a vehicle accident
involving Leonard Wayne Carrier and
our employee, Green Moree. If there is
no response, then we will ask council
for permission to handle this matter
through the courts. Don Lighty will
handle this case on a 25%contingency
recovery basis (plus expenses).
12130/98 BM500879 Reynolds Bryan Leg MVA Police $116 $383 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo &r
.Department a d j u s t e r Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
,J e n n i f e r Mr.William D.White and his insurance
Altoni, with company, USAA,for the City on August
USAA. 21, 1999. Demand was made for
$116.96 to recover medical expenses
and indemnity benefits the City paid
out. This demand was due to a vehicle
accident involving William D. White
and our employee, Bryan Reynolds. If
there is no response, then we will ask
council for permission to handle this
matter through the courts. Don Lighty
will handle this case on a 25%
contingency recovery basis (plus
expenses).
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09114199
Page 5 of 9
DATE OF CLAIM LAST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOu T . RESERVE: TYPE OF NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAME (NAME PART.:::: PAID, CIAlIN
INJURY a$Of as of
6"ilos d8f31 09
12/23198 BM500863 Robichaux James Multiple MVA Police $4,849 $4,150 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo Fr
body Department adjuster, Mr. Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
parts Tom Walker Mr. Hi Seong Yoon and his insurance
with Farmers company,Farmers Insurance Group, for
Insurance the City on August 21, 1999. Demand
Group. was made for $3,708.16 to recover
medical expenses and indemnity
benefits the City paid out. This
demand was due to a vehicle accident
involving Hi Seong Yoon and our
employee,James Robichaux. There was
no response. We will ask council for
permission to handle this matter
through the courts. Don Lighty will
handle this case on a 25%contingency
recovery basis(plus expenses).
12123/98 BM500860 Lowe Carol Multiple MVA Police $4,896 $4,103 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo Er
body Department adjuster, Mr. Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
Pam Tom Walker Mr. Hi Seong Yoon and his insurance
with Farmers company,Farmers Insurance Group,for
Insurance the City on August 21, 1999. Demand
Group. was made for $4,896.49 to recover
medical expenses and indemnity
benefits the City paid out. This
demand was due to a vehicle accident
involving Hi Seong Yoon and our
employee, Carol Lowe. There was no
response. We will ask council for
permission to handle this matter
through the courts. Don Lighty will
handle this case on a 25%contingency
recovery basis (plus expenses).
12130198 BM500878 White Kevin Back MVA Police $877 $5,557 Working with WNA sent a letter putting the
Department adjuster. insurance company on notice. Sherry
Brown with WNA is staying in contact
with the adjuster.
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09/14/99
Page 6 of 9
RATE OF CLAIM LAST FIR5T BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT !RESERVE TYPE OF NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAM£! NAME PART PAID CLAIM
INJURY as of as of
08131199 081311#4
12/16/97 BM500659 Boutte Alcide Back MVA Public Works $5,460 $3,439 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo &
adjuster, Erica Freeman,L.L.P. sent a demand letter to
Sullivan, with Ms. Jewel Rodgers and her insurance
State Farm company,State Farm Insurance,for the
Insurance City on August 21, 1999. Demand was
made for$5,462.20 to recover medical
expenses and indemnity benefits the
City paid out. This demand was due to
a vehicle accident involving Ms.Jewell
Rodgers and our employee, Alcide
Boutte. There was no response. We
will ask council for permission to
handle this matter through the courts.
Don Lighty will handle this case on a
25% contingency recovery basis (plus
expenses).
10/06/96 BM500426 Girard Sandra Neck Slip/Fall Public Health $38,106 $13,984 3rd Party Law Sandra Girard Stinnet filed a law suit
(Stinnet) Suit with Mayberry Concessions and is
represented by Tim Ferguson of the
Ferguson Firm. Don Lighty with
Stevens, Baldo Er Freeman, L.L.P.filed a
petition in intervention for the City on
June 3, 1999. Don Lighty will handle
this case on a 25% contingency
recovery basis (plus expenses).
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09114199
Page 7 of 9
DATE OF CLAIM LAST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT RESERVE TYP€OF NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAME, PART PAID CLAIM
INJURY as of q$of
004/09 o8/. it
11128197 BM500689 Johnson Catherine Hand Struck By Public Health $8,081 $8,181 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo &
adjustor, Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
Karen Eaton Williams Medic Aid EMS for the City on
with Empire August 21, 1999. Demand was made
Fire &r Marine for $7,256.12 to recover medical
Insurance expenses and indemnity benefits the
City paid out. This demand was due to
an accident involving John Tilley, an
employee of Williams Medic Aid EMS
and our employee, Catherine Johnson.
There was no response, so now we are
asking council for permission to handle
this matter through the courts. Don
Lighty will handle this case on a 25%
contingency recovery basis (plus
expenses).
11/18/98 BM500859 Zeno Fredrick Back MVA Public Works $6,145 $4,605 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo Er
adjuster, Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
Stacey, with Flex C. Broussard and his insurance
Progressive company,Progressive Insurance, for the
Insurance City on August 21, 1999. Demand was
Company. made for $6,145.82 to recover medical
expenses and indemnity benefits the
City paid out. This demand was due to
a vehicle accident involving Flex C.
Broussard and our employee, Fred
Zeno. There was no response. We will
ask council for permission to handle
this matter through the courts. Don
Lighty will handle this case on a 25%
contingency recovery basis (plus
expenses).
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09114199
Page 8 of 9
DATE OF CLAIM LAST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT RESERVE TYPE OF NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAME! NAME '' PART PAID CLAIM::-.
INJURY as of as of
;.
08131199 08131199
05/15198 BM500737 Martin Alice Back MVA Water $4,616 $8,732 Attorney Alice Martin's attorney, Mr. Brent
Utilities representing Thomas with Bush ,Lewis Fr Roebuck
settled this claim for $15,000 without
our knowledge. Don Lighty with
Stevens, Baldo Lx Freeman, L.L.P. has
been retained to try and recover the
medical expenses and the indemnity
benefits that the City has paid out.
Don Lighty has had several meetings
with the parties involved. If a
resolution is not agreed upon then we
will be asking council for permission to
handle this matter through the courts.
11/12198 BM500867 Castille Michael Elbow MVA Water $177 $322 Working with Don Lighty with Stevens, Baldo Lx
Utilities adjuster, Freeman,LLP. sent a demand letter to
.Judith Bostic, Judith Bostic with State Farm Insurance
/ State Farm Company for the City on August 21,
Insurance 1999. Demand was made for $177.45
Company. to recover medical expenses the City
paid out. This demand was due to a
vehicle accident involving John D. Evans
and our employee, Michael Castille.
There was no response. We will ask
council for permission to handle this
matter through the courts. Don Lighty
will handle this case on a 25%
contingency recovery basis (plus
expenses).
r -
Subrogation Claims Summary
As of 09114199
Page 9 of 9
DATE OF CLAIM LAST FIRST BODY CAUSE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT RESERVE TYPE OF NOTES
INJURY NUMBER NAME NAME PART PAID ; CLAIM►
INJURY as Qf as of
08131199 08131/99
02125193 BM281680 Gatlin Freddie Back Lifting Clean $142,150 $0 3rd Party Law A release of lien was signed by the City
garbage Community Suit Manager on August 24, 1999, and we
bags. /Solid Waste Malpractice collected $77,720.20 and received a
credit for future benefits of
$4.0,000.
06112197 BM500554 Rogers Michael Multiple MVA Police $38,495 $4,459 Possible law This matter was successfully resolved,
body Department suit and a release and indemnity agreement
parts was signed by the City Manager on
September 9, 1999. We are now
waiting to receive a check for the
policy limits of$25.000.
subroga.09
/js
14
September 21, 1999
Consider approving a change order for the Ector Street Ditch Crossing of US 69,
96, 287
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Director of Public Works
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 9, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider Change Order No. 1 for the Ector Street Ditch Crossing of
US 69, 96, 287.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of$75,735 for the Ector
Street Ditch Crossing Project. This amount represents the City's one-third cost of the total change
order.
BACKGROUND
The City of Beaumont, in July 1997, executed an agreement with the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) and Drainage District No. 6 (DD 46) for drainage improvements to the
Ector Street Ditch. The entities would participate on a one-third basis for the installation of
additional drainage boxes under US 69, 96, 287. TxDOT awarded the contract in February 1999 to
the low bidder at a cost of$1,203,163.39. For some unknown reason, the estimated quantity for
temporary special shoring was reduced after the estimated quanties were submitted to TxDOT for
bidding purposes. This item was reduced from 420 square meters to 245 square meters. The
proposed change order is to increase the amount of temporary special shoring to the actual quantity
used on the project.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
The City's share will increase from $401,054.63 to $476,789.63 with Change Order No. 1. The
engineer's estimated cost of the project prior to receipt of the bids was $1,000,000.
PREVIOUS ACTION
The City entered into an agreement with TxDOT and DD 46 in July 1997 to construct this project.
Page 1 of 2
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/deny the administrative recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of
$75,735 for the Ector Street Ditch Crossing at US 69, 96, 287.
Page 2 of 2
15
September 21, 1999
Consider approving a revision to Section 26-24 of the Code of Ordinances relating to
school speed zones
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
K
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Mark Horelica, Transportation Administrator
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 7, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a revision to Section 26-24 of the Code of
Ordinances. This section establishes boh the time limits and zone
boundaries for the reduced school speed zones now in effect.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends amending the Code of Ordinances as follows:
DELETE FROM SCHEDULE B
STREET DIRECTION OF DESCRIPTION
TRAVEL
West Virginia E & W From a point 180 feet west of
the centerline of Goliad to a
point 350 feet east of the
centerline of St. Louis.
Page 1 of 2
ADD TO SCHEDULED
STREET DIRECTION OF DESCRIPTION
TRAVEL
West Virginia E & W From a point 180 feet west of
the centerline of Goliad to a
point 350 feet east of the
centerline of St. Louis.
BACKGROUND
Changes in the Beaumont Independent School District attendance schedule for Odom Academy
fequire modifications to the Code of Ordinances. The boundary for this zone will remain the
same, however the time limits now in effect will require adjustment.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and Transportation Administrator
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny an amendment to the Code of Ordinances to establish time limits and zone
boundaries for reduced school speed zones.
Page 2 of 2
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26,
SECTION 26-24 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE `
CITY OF BEAUMONT TO AMEND SCHEDULE B AND D IN
SCHOOL ZONES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL AND PROVIDING A PENALTY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
Section 1.
That Chapter 26, Section 26-24 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Beaumont
be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows:
DELETE FROM SCHEDULE B
STREET DIRECTION OF TRAVEL DESCRIPTION
West Virginia E & W From a point 180 feet west
of the centerline of Goliad
to a point 350 feet east of
the centerline of St. Louis
ADD TO SCHEDULE D
STREET DIRECTION OF TRAVEL DESCRIPTION
West Virginia E & W From a point 180 feet west
of the centerline of Goliad
to a point 350 feet east of
the centerline of St. Louis
Section 2.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the
application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances, should for any reason
be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of this
ordinance, and to such end the various portions and provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be severable.
Section 3•
That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the
extent of the conflict only.
Section
That any person who violated any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction,
be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of the Code of Ordinances of Beaumont, Texas.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
1999.
- Mayor-
City of Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 1:30 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA
* Approval of minutes
* Confirmation of committee appointments
Herman Rogers - Small Business Revolving Loan Fund Advisory Committee
Don Vallier - Convention and Tourism Advisory Committee
A) Approve a resolution supporting the reconstruction of Highway 87
B) Approve the acquisition of properties for the Concord Road Improvement Project
C) Approve the acquisition of property for the Walden Road Improvement Project
D) Approve a License to Encroach Agreement for the installation of a groundwater
monitoring well
E) Authorize the acceptance of a sewer line easement
F) Approve a street name change from Taft Street to Brownstone Drive
G) Authorize the settlement of a claim
Consent Agenda Summary September 21, 1999
• Approval of minutes
• Confirmation of committee appointments
Herman Rogers would be appointed to the Small Business Revolving Loan Fund Advisory
Committee. The term would commence September 21, 1999 and expire September 20, 2001.
(Councilmember Bobbie Patterson)
Don Vallier would be appointed to the Convention and Tourism Advisory Committee. The term
would commence September 21, 1999 and expire September 20, 2001. (Councilmember Bobbie
Patterson)
A) Approve a resolution supporting the reconstruction of Highway 87
Administration recommends approval of a resolution supporting the reconstruction of Highway 87
and urging the Federal Highway Administration to move forward with the project as soon as
possible. A transportation route has existed in the vicinity of Highway 87 between Sabine Pass and
High Island for more than 100 years. Until its closure in 1989, Highway 87 provided a direct link
for all of Southeast Texas traveling to and from Galveston County. A letter from the County Judge
is attached for your review.
B) Approve the acquisition of properties for the Concord Road Improvement Project
1) Property located at 3090 Gulf Street (0.034 acre out of Lot 1, Block 3 of the Morningside
Addition) would be purchased from Ut Thi Nguyen and Man Van Tran for the appraised value of
$3,089.
2) Property located at 3045 and 3047 Magnolia Street (0.099 acre out of the James Drake Survey,
Abstract 18) would be purchased from Charles D. Foutz for the appraised value of$14,000. The
properties were appraised by Bishop Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. Administration recommends
approval of the property acquisitions.
C)Approve the acquisition of property for the Walden Road Improvement Project
Property located at 5198 Fannett Road(0.0124 acre out of the Samuel Stivers League, Abstract 51)
would be purchased from Vita Mae LaSalle Bates for the appraised value of$950. Administration
recommends approval of the acquisition of the above property.
D)Approve a License to Encroach Agreement for the installation of a groundwater monitoring
well
Administration recommends approval of a License to Encroach Agreement with Corrigan
Consulting, Inc., as agent for Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd., on the City's Washington Boulevard
right-of-way for the installation of a groundwater monitoring well. A new groundwater monitoring
well is being installed to delineate groundwater contamination from a petroleum release at the
Speedy Stop facility located at 501 Washington Boulevard. The License protects the City from
liability and provides a 30 day cancellation clause. A copy of the staff memorandum is attached for
your review.
E) Authorize the acceptance of a sewer line easement
The Trustees of the New Testament Holiness Church have conveyed a ten foot wide Sanitary Sewer
Line Easement to the City of Beaumont on their property described as being out of Lot 1,Block 118
of the Pinecrest Addition. A new sewer line will be installed to serve the church. Administration
recommends acceptance of the easement. A copy of the staff memorandum is attached for your
review.
F) Approve a street name change from Taft Street to Brownstone Drive
Stephen Brown, developer of Brownstone Subdivision, and Bill Little,developer of Christina Court
Subdivision, have requested this name change. Mr. Brown owns eight of the eleven lots in
Brownstone. Mr. Little owns all of the lots in Christina Court. Mr. Brown has contacted the other
two property owners in Brownstone and they are in favor of the name change. The application is
in compliance with City of Beaumont Resolution, No. 88-231, Street Naming Policy.
Administration recommends approval of the request. A copy of the staff memorandum is attached
for your review.
G)Authorize the settlement of a claim
Administration recommends payment of Southwestern Bell's property damage claim in the amount
of$81,686.24. This matter was discussed in an Executive Session on September 7, 1999.
A
A.. City of Beaumont
•�• Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kyle Hayes, Executive Assistant to the City Manager
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 16, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider approving a resolution supporting the reconstruction of
Highway 87.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval of a resolution supporting the reconstruction of Highway
87.
BACKGROUND
A transportation route has existed in the vicinity of Highway 87 between Sabine Pass and High
Island for more than 100 years. Until its closure in 1989, Highway 87 provided a direct link for
all of Southeast Texas traveling to and from Galveston County. A letter from the County Judge
is attached for your review.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Executive Assistant to the City Manager.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny a resolution supporting the reconstruction of Highway 87.
tiA
T>rX h
�LtL�r�tdq,�
geA&,koa @aaa[o&% d uoam Bawwa st 409-8354466
eA O.mom 40225 Bpi.oWv*4ov.727. ..19 f.w.8s6 ti
0eauw�aa4 6Lvm 77704 ayiNtllc 4ML8".2-3ff
VIA FACSIMILE
September 15, 1999
The Hon. David Moore, Mayor
and the Beaumont City Council
P. Q. Box 3827
Beaumont, Texas 77704
Dear Mayor and City Council,
The Federal Highways Administration will hold a scoping meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday,
September 23rd at the Port Arthur Civic Center to receive public comments regarding ►he
reconstruction of State Highway 87.
Local leaders have long considered reconstruction of the highway to be a matter of regional
importance and I would appreciate your support for the project. I have attached sample language
for a resolution of support which I would ask the City Council to consider at its earliest
convenience.
I would also ask that a member of the City Council attend the meeting to present the resolution to
the FHWA, if possible. I believe this would amplify your statement of support and demonstrate
that the project truly is a regional issue. If no one is available,I would ask you to forward the
resolution to me and I will be glad to present it on behalf of the City Council.
Thank you for your support. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me. -
ce y,
11
Carl R. Griffith,Jr.
County Judge
B
...
City of Beaumont
�• Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 16, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the acquisition of Parcels
108 and 114 of the Concord Road Improvement Project.
RECOMMENDATION
The owners of the properties listed below have agreed to convey the properties for the right-of-
way of the Concord Road Improvement Project.
Parcel 108: 0.034 acre out of Lot 1, Block 3 of the Morningside Addition
(3090 Gulf Street)
Appraised Value: $3,100
Less Improvements Retained 1
Total Compensation $3,089
(Partial Taking)
Appraiser: Bishop Real Estate Appraisers, Inc.
Owners: Ut Thi Nguyen and Man Van Tran
Parcel 114: 0.099 acre out of the James Drake Survey, Abstract 18
(3045 and 3047.Magnolia Street)
Appraised Value: $14,000
(Whole Taking)
Appraiser: Bishop Real Estate Appraisers, Inc.
Owner: Charles D. Foutz
Administration recommends authorization to acquire these properties.
BACKGROUND
The property is in the Drainage portion of Phase II of the Concord Road Improvement Project.
There are 16 parcels in this section. Appraisals have been completed and offers made on all of
the parcels to be acquired.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
This project is funded under the Capital Improvement Program.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Three parcels have been acquired since July 1999. Authorization for eminent domain has been
approved for one parcel.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
Eleven offers are pending and the owners of one parcel have accepted the appraised value for their
property.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing the acquisition of Parcels 108 and 114 of the Concord Road
Improvement Project.
SUBJECT
CONCORD ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PALE
H '��. RT N
Of ' C J P S '�
PROP03ED �z W I = rk
RIGHT—OF—WAY
EA L
ACOU131TION H �Q DELA A E a a
PARCEL NO. 108 TINA J �+� MANNIN
a
LAW E�'' Ta
0.034 ACRE OUT OF LASS40USE ,
LOT 16 BLOCKS Z agno�ln�< 4
OF THE MORNING31DE u South Texas Ssrk a
ADDITION (3000 GULF STREET) Y FState
und <
(PARTIAL TAKING) Fair Park St M LE
�p SF RR es
OWNERS: E T7 -o � 9 ��
UT THI NGUYEN AND ark 13 d
MAN VAN TRAN
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
�'- SUBJECT PROPERTY
V /
� E \
N.T.S.
ck
\ N�
., �5 LOT 1
�+ o to .
I=
s x
0
V)
rn 30 LOT 2
MORNINGSIDE ADDITION
VOL 2. PACE 74
J.C.M.R.
LN1f BWINC 067ANCE _ /
t N 63,29.78'E 72.6]• I
2 S 2T,0•38•E
3 S 63,31}I'N B,AS• / \
. N 0742"00'w x,.29• ' ' LOT 3 \
•frPYCIE s
SUBJECT
CONCORD ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT A N
Pine
� Par m
y W
Li Li
PROPOSED = EA L
RIGHT—OF—WAY H P D p A E< % z
ACCUISITION ANNING
PARCEL NO. 114 LAC
a
R
0.000 ACRE iLASS63 usE " T
OUT OF THE .�
JAMES DRAKE '.SURVEY South Texas
ABSTRACT 18 Fairground ` COT ON EROD
5045 AND $047 Fair Park sl
MAGNOLIA ST. SF RR es
(WHOLE TAKING) p Mvg�oli
C TT y emeter
OWNER= z
CHARLES D. FOUTZ o > 4 TIME `"
a
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY ''
DELAWARE STREET
v:tiv:::: ::r:ti r:;:::' ::li4::: :•:':: XX
4 PROPOM R.O.W. ,"', . :vii%
•.•tira;•:v. atititi�::� •:1Y AfeSenw : v.•
"ffVV X
•„r• j
W N.T.S.
+mac OMW w 4
IO 100_2._1sw ciao-m-�t R
u.Al.11 aea.�
b
' Q
i
i
um BEAW C 2-�CE
1 14 8X23'30'E '
/ 2 S 2631'28• E
3 S 83'31'31'N SCAL.E:1�a30' N 26'35'37'w
AB►ABiN
c
City of Beaumont
� - _
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider a resolution authorizing the acquisition of Parcel 25 of the
Walden Road Improvement Project.
RECOMMENDATION
The owner of the property listed below has agreed to convey the property for the right-of-way for
the Walden Road Improvement Project.
Parcel 25: 0.0124 acre of land out of the Samuel Stivers League, Abstract 51
(5198 Fannett Road)
Appraised Value $950
(Partial Taking)
Appraiser: Bishop Real Estate Appraisers, Inc.
Owner: Vita Mae LaSalle Bates
Administration recommends authorization to acquire the property.
BACKGROUND
Construction is under contract for the improvements to Walden Road from FM 364 (Major Drive)
to Interstate Highway 10. Council authorized the extension of the contract to include the section
from Interstate Highway 10 to State Highway 124 (Fannett Road) on July 13, 1999.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
This project is funded under the Capital Improvement Program.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Four parcels which have been acquired were approved by Council in January, March and July,
1999.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
Two offers are pending on the section from FM 364 (Major Drive) to Interstate Highway 10.
Two owners have accepted the appraised value on the section from Interstate 10 to State Highway
124 (Fannett Road).
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing the acquisition of Parcel 25 of the Walden Road Improvement Project.
SUBJECT
WALDEN ROAD c►
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
�lp cu
PROPOSED
RIGHT-OF-WAY ? � fPNN�tt
ACOU131TION
PARCEL NO. 25
�L
p
0.0124 ACRE OF LAND OUT OF a p�
SAMUEL STIVERS LEAGUE, o W
ABSTRACT 51 W =
' (5198 FANNETT
PARTIAL TAKING ROAD) a �'rF�, ~ RD
H
OWNER= VITA MAE LASALLE BATES
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
� • 4
v o
v ti
wrs
1 4,
Aw ao w.
swr V
mar i ""� Pw. Cf omm
MOON /MOON /
A11J6NAe/f
/ wAUXN Rao
ct
v
1
,GWL.a.,G
N.T.S.
D
. f
City of Beaumont
•�• Council Agenda Item
__ ..............
c
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 15, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the execution of a License
to Encroach Agreement with Corrigan Consulting, Inc., as agent for
Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd., on the City's Washington
Boulevard right-of-way for the installation of a groundwater
monitoring well.
RECOMMENDATION
Corrigan Consulting, Inc. proposes to install a groundwater monitoring well. The license will
cover the monitoring well at the following location:
(1) One hundred eighty feet(180') west of the intersection of the west right-of-way
line of M. L. King, Jr. Parkway and fifteen feet (15') north of the north right-of-
way line of Washington Boulevard.
Administration recommends authorization to execute a License to Encroach Agreement.
BACKGROUND
A new groundwater monitoring well is being installed to delineate groundwater contamination
from a petroleum release at the Speedy Stop facility located at 501 Washington Boulevard,
adjacent to Lot 2, Block 5 of the Arlington Addition. The License Agreement protects the City
from liability and provides a thirty (30) day cancellation clause.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
There is a one time fee of$500 for the License to Encroach.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing the execution of a License to Encroach Agreement with Corrigan
Consulting,Inc., as agent for Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd., on the City's Washington Boulevard
right-of-way for the installation of a groundwater monitoring well.
08/10/99 TUE 07:26 FAX 8 Public Works �OC2
APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO ENCROACH
CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS
NAME OFAPPLICAN'T_Corrigan Consulting, Inp.
ADDRESS 1909 Capri Lane, Seabrook, Tx PHONE 281-474-7455
77586
AUIH01= OF APPLICANT __-Con su 1 t a nt
NAME OF OWNER Speedy Stop Food Stoxes, Ptd. .
P.O. Box 1876 Victoria, Texas 77902
ADDRESS 501 Washington Blvd, Beaumont, -PHONE 4097832-8385
Texas 7705
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF OWNHR'S PROYEK17Y (1.01 , BLOCKS, SUBDIVISION) TO
BE SERVED BY EASEh(EM OR RIGHT-OF-WAY_In r i ah t-o f-way a d i a n
to,Washington Blvd . , Arlington Addition; Lot 2, Block 5
DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY INVOLVED _C i t y of Beaumont
Riaht-of-Way between Washington Ave. and sidewalk
PRESENT USE OF EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY (LIST VITLITIFS YF PRESENTS _
unknown - utilities to be determined
USE OF EASEMENT OR RIGHT-orWAY DESIRED BY OWNER
inci-allation of Monitoring well as directed by the Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission.
ATTACH A MAP OR PLAT DEL- NBAMNG TEE EASEMENT OR PUBLIC RiG$T-0E-
WAY (DIMIENMONED AND TO EKGZnDazjNG SCALE).
COST TO BE PAID FOR LICENSE TO ENCROACH S500 - PAYABLE ONE WEEK
PRIOR .TO CITY COTINCM ME I:T FnNG AT w m coTTNC:T[. T4 TQ CONsmER
APPROVAL.
. Ut
SIGNATURE
COMMENTS FROM DEPARTMENTS AND/OR UTILITY COMPANIES
FOR
LICENSE TO ENCROACH APPLICATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 501 Washington Boulevard - described as being adjacent to `
Lot 2 in Block 5, Arlington Addition, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas. Said encroachment being
the installation of groundwater monitoring well onto the City's one hundred foot (100') Washington
Boulevard right-of-way.
APPLICANT: Corrigan Consulting, Inc. as agent for Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd.
DATE OF DISTRIBUTION: August 27, 1999
1) Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer Date Received: 9-1-99
Acceptance and approval.
2) Don Burrell, Code Enforcement Date Received: 8-30-99
Acceptance and approval.
3) Micky Bertrand, Fire Department Date Received: 9-3-99
Acceptance and approval.
4) S. A. Webb, Water Utilities Date Received: 9-2-99
Acceptance and approval. Notify Water Utilities 48 hours prior to working site for live
locates.
5) Stephen Richardson, Planning Department Date Received: 8-30-99
Acceptance and approval.
6) Mark Horelica, Traffic Administrator Date Received: 8-30-99
Acceptance and approval.
7) Jeff Steely, ENTEX Corporation Date Received: 9-15-99
Acceptance and approval.
8) James Bryant, Entergy Date Received: 9-13-99
Acceptance and approval.
9) Steve Bush, Southwestern Bell Telephone Date Received: N/A
SWBT has informed the City that they will pursue a separate and independent
license agreement with the property owners for an additional fee.
10) Richard Le Blanc, DD #6 Date Received: 9-8-99
Acceptance and approval.
11) Tyrone Cooper, Legal Department Date Received: 9-14-99
Acceptance and approval.
encroach.com
SUBJECT
LICENSE TO ENCROACH
WASHINGTON BLVD. z c � AN rE a ao ORTE BUR
RIGHT-OF-WAY
FOR MADIS11N
W Y Z R 19EL r S O
INSTALLATION OF w as a < H VAN Y BUF EN W _
A GROUNDWATER R B rs a _
MONITORING WELL PR a LE LEE S Ry
ATE L
q HINT � r2C
HARRIL]T a
APPLICANT: CORRIGAN PI A E. ALM
CONSULTING, INC.O H EA NE DL E. Tn ADN EDL �s
SPEEDY STOP FOOD TORES, LTD. ELGIE z P o
z E. ELG
Y CH RC z Z = a ,CHURL
a PI IN = H A 9�PKM
J
07
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY...
I r
-PROPOSED - WELL
MONIT-ORINO �.
WASHINGTON BLVD. q�
ja
7 B 9
P ,3 4 3 t
Q
b0
5' 24 ' 150
2
50' 50 s-r.
oSEO 3 �� 30 60
-IP
YG 9
= I /8 /7 � !6 !S �'� c
2 �!
SO j3 A
4p V
r
N
Q
O
N
N.T.S.
E
Cit y of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a
sanitary sewer line easement.
RECOMMENDATION
The Trustees of the New Testament Holiness Church have conveyed a ten foot wide Sanitary
Sewer Line Easement to the City of Beaumont on their property described as being out of Lot 1,
Block 118 of the Pinecrest Addition.
Administration recommends acceptance of the easement.
BACKGROUND
There is an existing sanitary sewer line in the alley at the rear of their property. The adjoining
property owner is a cemetery. The alley has been fenced and graves are located over the sewer
line. A new sewer line will be installed to serve the church and the line running through the
cemetery will be abandoned.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing the acceptance of a sanitary sewer line easement. `
SUBJECT
- VAUGHN
LUCAS
= Z IVE CREST F RWAY
PROPOSED ACCEPTANCE W N 9 TRINIDAD
OF A SANITARY SEWER
LINE EASEMENT PARRY
u H h ZQ,
OUT OF LOT I, BLOCK 118 W y
OF THE PINECREST
PIE C o
ADDITION a BukHAl IA W $
a GILL�+
HAYES j ¢ �y �'! E thony
HYDR00 r UTI W > Z a cem
K TOLE 0 ~ h HALE
Z
LEIGH v~i vvi
A
TAFT IVES r -J L
OWNERS NEW TESTAMENT EARL W IN
HOLINESS CHURCH I PRIMR SE EA L 0 �
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
6 -
sl
BUGS �
N.T.S.
7
O � z
l
�s�
...... City of Beaumont Council Agenda� EL g Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a street name change from Taft Street
to Brownstone Drive.
RECOMMENDATION
The administration recommends approval of the request.
BACKGROUND
The name change is for Taft Street in the Brownstone and Christina Court subdivisions.
Stephen Brown, developer of Brownstone Subdivision, and Bill Little, developer of Christina
Court Subdivision, have requested this name change. Mr. Brown owns eight of the eleven lots
in Brownstone. Mr. Little owns all of the lots in Christina Court. Mr. Brown has contacted
the other two property owners in Brownstone and they are in favor of the name change.
This application is in compliance with City of Beaumont Resolution, No. 88-231, Street
Naming Policy. There is not another street with the same name or phonetic sound of another
local street. The new name is for a complete street and the name represents no commercial
endorsement.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None
PREVIOUS ACTION
At the September 8, 1999 Regular Meeting, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend
approval of this request.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
Planning Commission, City Manager and Planning Manager
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny a request for a street name change from Taft Street to Brownstone Drive in the
Brownstone and Christina Court subdivisions.
Stephen D. Brown
Brownstone Investment Corporation
,
Date: June 28, 1999.
To: City of Beaumont
I am hereby requesting that Taft Street running west from West Lucas Drive through
Brownstone Subdivision be changed to Brownstone Drive. This part of Taft Street will
cul-de-sac and end in Christina Court which W. T. (Bill)Little is developing. This part of
Taft Street is isolated from any other part of Taft Street and will never be connected. I
still own eight of the eleven lots on Taft Street in Brownstone Subdivision and Bill Little
still owns all the lots on Taft Street in Christina Court Subdivision. Bill Little concurs
with this request.
Since
Stephen D.Brown
Brownstone Investment Corporation . T. (Bill)Little
fill _.
rig YYK
Z40 �1Nil
mmZ� ��,A
Ilvai <L7Ovi:D I
311.4
3n1aa sd on'i'--
• • �..�. V• HO"W JI vm
o�Sl � ,9'btl
a;----------------------- L-------- ------
ol
m of
� � N
M
� y
N w �
------------N.__--_.� ' ' --__---------- W
N psi
N
N 1 �
i
h
r �
OI r ,^� N l d i
Q , N
J � •s.
s
D
6
o •
1
a
e C
•� a•r arr�..ew .1 E
-- ASl
.OSI •� i
:1
� �o S
aw .�•+r
m m 29 24 23 22 21 20 U ,s 17 is Is 14 ,! 12 II I
II I
II I
N N u
20 2, 22 t2 ! 24
• ti ^P it COOLC,z s,tiar III•
ao>trrnr�1DOOt! /� 25 !II It
\ _______ _ �/ `•111`.
—��— -------- --_it
�. 17 Is 12 II I
is � +• � +• �I I I III
•�,�,>�_ . .. W II I III
II II I
Scale 1. 50 r r �. I ' n II I
21 • . , 11 It 1s II I I ' •
e�ww•ewe L1M
MA �M I•
w r�..r1 w • I r ` I!
swlss�rl�lr�a+f� h �;r,
-
2• Yir � • � • • �
7 >
ww~ia�•✓6.t t I
A PRELAlIARY PLAT
n Rnw w�a.���•waa OF
IX.IM INS 4m r00wrwL10a.rrwrr
R...,,..r. •""' CHRISTINA COURT
.....�..=rw w rr.wc a.. r.° I + ———
•.• 49 I I A REPEAT OF
(�u�oeveuorllot� I
so voltim t Avw +I) I I W"a•n•«.BLOC a
swat 2 ] • s • ..r�.wasw !I I I LM 12 s••1 V.•LOOK 42
LIM.ri. rt r�rZ•w I I LOU R Ift 47.<OCK 42
"lot LOTS to Ml V.■ M t7
r...w 1Ki,wf wrurw wr.w wiwr.r�w r w. II I I L4=HIO•NOi pf1D1lOL
u.•�.w war I I I VOUM LI PACE 1.,YJ,.tG
�.—.•Z a err.r.n.a r+.w.rwt w
�.�.r..rw�.►r w r.. INTO s.:.—«._...iw•..w: "• I I Lon+7NM1 is
Ilr� �.T�rr rr�w.•. I ( ocaaac vn o:raar,nrt.•Le.
wr.wwrurwar rww.rrw.rr.nr • _ •Z!!w `..SLO•!!�.+t•� �.��j..rr.�=rr.waw.r� I I
.�s
Mw- .r wrrrrw.
1 I E9'['1'Z I §RwMj
.I.Mw�1 rMi�Mw wr r.wwt w.s �-.•1.
.. wi.w a7o.�rO rrw r� •� r
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF
TAFT STREET TO BROWNSTONE DRIVE IN BEAUMONT,
JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT Taft Street running west from West Lucas Drive through Brownstone Subdivision
and ending in Christina Court, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, as shown on Exhibits
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, be and the same is hereby renamed
to Brownstone Drive.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
' 1999.
- Mayor -
Z� � a •• ' mmZW Oir►.�► a
on
C
...................---..--..--.......---•---..-..-...-.--.. -
s 3niaa soon r,
1- " OS
e.Osl ,9 02l
i
--------------------... -•«----------------
to fr
i -
~ - l L---------------------
/ V
V ! I N
• n w t
--------------------- ' I ------- w
N pi
N
N 1 f
i
o' r
of
co
s 1 e =
0
1
b
-------------------- ------------------
o
-----� = --- -�-----------
Oak
al
a
f . C
1-�`t•�trtt�N _ i 0
tD I � . •
f 4ULasw&LV •�
pY » •�
r
— � f
'091 5 Os l i
� •o s
1 -- EXHIBIT "A"
� p •
I I •�..9.sa:sssa7 Its a!„•���� � A
gA Oslo
_ ! ~ 99993
I
---JI
\` ——1 f I
I � = II •
" II
• I I I I I ( � ,i� i i!
L
1
8
!i
���l�t I !!s
p � 1 � II II II
R I I '� -� I I I I • .
II II
� I
r
HIM
II II 11
t
A i I
` w ��hYYr•r
�t 1
EXHIBIT "B" l�3
G
...... City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Matt Martin, Liability Administrator
MEETING DATE: September 14, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 16, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a resolution authorizing payment of
Southwestern Bell's property damage claim in the
amount of$81,686.24
RECOMA'IENDATION
Administration recommends payment of Southwestern Bell's property damage claim in the amount
of$81,686.24
BACKGROUND
In December, 1997, the City of Beaumont Transportation Department damaged Southwestern
Bell's underground cable and conduit at Wall Street and Pearl. The damage occurred during
installation of the lights for the parking lot west of the Julie Rogers Theater. The administration
has determined that the City is legally responsible for damages resulting from the failure to request
proper locates prior to excavation in a non-emergency situation. Bell has also agreed to drop ten
smaller claims which were being processed.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
The liability trust fund will be reduced by $81,686.24.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
f
TO: City Council MEETING DATE: 14, 1999
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 16, 1999
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, City Attorney, and Liability Administrator
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorization of payment for Southwestern Bell's property damage claim in the
amount of$81,686.24
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the claim of Southwestern Bell has been discussed in an Executive
Session properly called and held Tuesday, September 7, 1999; and,
WHEREAS, the Council desires to authorize the settlement of the claim;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Attorney be and he is hereby authorized to settle the claim of Southwestern
Bell in the amount of Eighty-one Thousand Six-Hundred Eighty-six and 24/100
($81,686.24) Dollars.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
' 1999.
- Mayor -
I N T E R
MEMO
O F F I C E `
To: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
From: Beverly Hodges, Finance Officer
cc: Mayor and City Council
Subject: Council Request - Use of Hotel Occupancy Tax
Date: September 17, 1999 l l
- f
Attached please find the specific subchapter taken from the Texas Municipal Hotel Occupancy
Statute. Section 351.101 provides for the"use and allocation of revenue."The question arose
during discussion of the FY2000 Budget presentation as to whether HOT funds could be used for
economic development.
It is my interpretation of the statute that economic development activities may not be funded as
that would be considered a"general government operation"which is specifically prohibited in
Section 351.101(b) as attached. This section states that "Revenue derived....shall be expended in a
manner directly enhancing and promoting tourism and the convention and hotel industry as
permitted in Subsection(a)." Subsection(a)provides specific limits on how the funds may be
expended.
If you would like further information or a legal review of the matter the City Attorney's Office
may provide a more detailed opinion.
LOCAL TAXATION OCAL TAXATION § 351.101
Title 3, •tle'3
Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1997,75th Leg.,
collections over to the municipality and who has failed to file a tax report or pay the tax when
due to collect the tax not paid or to enjoin the person from operating a hotel in the ,
es unicipality until the tax is paid or the report filed, as applicable, as provided by the court's
order. In addition to.the amount of any tax owed under this chapter,the person is liable to
4th Leg.,ch.454,in subd.(8),substi- he municipality for the municipality's reasonable attorney's fees and a penalty equal to 15
that is located in a county with a ercent of the total amount of the tax owed.
one million or more and" for "850,- ro). Section 16,061, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, applies to the collection of a tax
under this chapter. A limitation period provided by Title 2 relating to the time allowed to
ition assess taxes and bring a suit to collect taxes does not apply to a tax imposed under this
75th Leg., ch. 165, to conform to chapter or to a suit brought under this section.
law made by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., .(c) A municipality by ordinance may authorize misdemeanor punishment for a violation of
,)d. (2), substituted "under Chapter an ordinance adopted under this chapter.
'ation Code," for "pursuant to the (d) The remedies provided by this section are in addition to other available remedies.
ortation Corporation Act (Article Amended by Acts 1993,73rd Leg.,ch.259,§ 1.
Texas Civil Statutes)", and substi-
;hapter 431, Transportation Code, Historical and Statutory Notes
zo the Texas Transportation Corpo-
rticle 15281, Vernon's Texas Civil 1993 Legislation "(b) The change in law made by this Act does
The 1993 amendment,in subsec.(a),inserted the not affect taxes imposed before the effective date
second sentence; redesignated subsec. (b) as sub- of this Act,and the law in effect before the effec-
sec. (d) and substituted "remedies" for "remedy" five date of this Act is continued in effect for
and "are" for "is" therein; and inserted subsecs. purposes of the liability for and collection of those
ordinance may impose the tax (b)and(c). taxes."
rritorial jurisdiction. Section 2 of Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 259 pro- Acts 1993,73rd Leg.,ch.259,was approved May
vides: 23,1993. Due to a non-record vote in the House of
;on if as a result of the adoption .."(a) This Act takes effect on the first day of the Representatives, pursuant to the Const. Art 3,
racy taxes in the extraterritorial first calendar quarter beginning on or after the § 39, the earliest the Act could take effect was
a hotel. date this Act becomes law. August 30,1993. 8
§ 351.006. Exemption
es (a) A governmental entity excepted from the tax imposed by Chapter 156 under Section
ns relating to the effective date of 156.103(a)(1)or(a)(3)shall pay the tax imposed by this chapter but is entitled to a refund of '
d Leg., ch. 680, see Historical and the tax paid.
.s following§ 351.101. (b) A person who is described by Section 156.103(d)is exempt from the payment of the tax
authorized by this chapter.
(c) A person who is described by Section 156.103(c) shall pay the tax imposed by this
chapter but the state governmental entity with whom the person is associated is entitled to a
b)I refund of the tax paid.
(d) To receive a refund of tax paid under this chapter, the governmental entity entitled to
xceed nine percent of the price the refund must file a refund claim on a form provided by the municipality and containing the
pality to which Section 351.1015 information required by the municipality. The comptroller by rule shall prescribe the form
that must be used and the information that must be provided.
(e) A governmental entity may file a refund claim with the municipality under this chapter
only for each calendar quarter for all reimbursements accrued during that quarter. The
municipality may adopt an ordinance to enforce this section.
es Amended by Acts 1995,74th Leg.,ch.454,§ 6,eff.Sept.1,1995.
ct executed before the effective date Historical and Statutory Notes
provides for the payment of the tax ,
effect when the contract was execut- 1995 Legislation
contract is subject to change or The 1995 amendment rewrote the section. '
v reason of the tax rate increase. -` ¢
iplicahle to the use or possession of C,
the contract is the rate in effect ' SUBCHAPTER B. USE AND ALLOCATION OF REVENUE
'act was executed, and the law gov-
ite is continued in effect for that § 351.101. Use of Tax Revenue
(a) Revenue from the municipal hotel occupancy tax may be used only to promote tourism
and the convention and hotel industry,and that use is limited to the following:
(1) the acquisition of sites for and the construction, improvement, enlarging, equipping,
he municipality may bring suit repairing, operation, and maintenance of convention center facilities or visitor information
d by this chapter and pay the,'' centers,or both;
95
. I
§ 351.101 LOCAL TAXATIOiLOCAL"TAXATION
TitlelTitle 8
fence; in the third sentence deleted"by th
(2) the furnishing of facilities,personnel, and materials for the registration of conventiq�ty'preceding"from the tax authonzec
delegates or registrants;
end of the sentence deleted"or maintain
(3) advertising and conducting solicitations and promotional programs to attract tourisb4tg►m account"; at the end of the subsect
and convention delegates or registrants to the municipality or its vicinity; stituted"tax authorized by this chapter"
(4) the encouragement, promotion, improvement, and application of the arts, includin ibsec.( t0 the person under the cont
8 subsec.(fl in the first sentence,substitute
instrumental and vocal music, dance, drama, folk art, creative writing, architecture, desigl ence to Section 351.101(a)(1) or (3) fo:
and allied fields, painting, sculpture, photography, graphic and craft arts, motion pictures;ga51.101; in the second sentence, substiti
radio, television, tape and sound recording, and other arts related to the presentatio'thorized"for"for which hotel occupancy
{; performance,execution,and exhibition of these major art forms; and nue may be used" preceding"under thi=
(5) historical restoration and preservation projects or activities or advertisin an.substituted "that are not authorized u
g section' for for which hotel occupancy to
conducting solicitations and promotional programs to encourage tourists and convention inay not be used"following"conducts otl
delegates to visit preserved historic sites or museums: l ties",and at the end,substituted"author;
(A) at or in the immediate vicinity of convention center facilities or visitor information;
centers; or _§ 351.1015. Expired
(B) located elsewhere in the municipality or its vicinity that would be frequented bye?` Histor
tourists and convention delegates. i
(b) Revenue derived from the tax authorized by this chapter shall be expended in a manner The"expired section, which related to
directly enhancing and promoting tourism and the convention and hotel industry as permitted'nue for'the manned space flight touris
by Subsection (a). That revenue may not be used for the general revenue purposes or7 and which expired by its own terms on.
y general governmental operations of a municipality.
(c) The governing body of a municipality by contract may delegate to a person, including:§ 351.102. Pledge For Bonds
another governmental entity or a private organization, the management or supervision of. (a) Subject to the limitations pre
�! programs and activities funded with revenue from the tax authorized by this chapter. Thei revenue derived from the tax impo:
1 governing body in writing shall approve in advance the annual budget of the person to which,is under Section 3, Chapter
it delegates those functions and shall require the person to make periodic reports to the:-(Article.1269]-4.1, Vernon's Texas
governing body at least quarterly listing the expenditures made by the person with revenues by Section 351.101 or, in the case c
from the tax authorized by this chapter.The person must maintain revenue provided from the 'principal of or interest on bonds
tax authorized by this chapter in a separate account established for that purpose and may notV government corporation created un
commingle that revenue with any other money. The municipality may not delegate to any;.:pay the cost of the acquisition an(
1 ! person the management or supervision of its convention and visitors programs and activities—:acquisition,remodeling,or rehabilit
funded with revenue from the tax authorized by this chapter other than by contract as :P led S a may only be that portion of
provided by this subsection. The approval by the governing body of the municipality of the
annual budget of the person to whom the governing body delegates those functions creates a
s fiduciary duty in the person with respect to the revenue provided by the tax authorized byP,Amended by Acts 1993,73rd Leg.,ch.5
� this chapter.
eff.Sept.1,1997.
r ! [See main volume for(d),and (e)J Hisl
(f) Hotel occupancy tax revenue spent for a purpose authorized by this section may be,-:,. 1993 Legislation
spent for day-to-day operations, supplies, salaries, office rental, travel expenses, and other,';' The 1993 amendment permitted r(
administrative costs only if those administrative costs are incurred directly in the promotion''. county_hotel occupancy taxes collects
and servicing expenditures authorized under Section 351.101(a). If a municipal or other,`' convention center hotels or historic
public or private entity that conducts an activity authorized under this section conducts other`: pledged to pay costs of acquisition,cor
�. rehabilitation of said hotels.
activities that are not authorized under this section, the portion of the total administrative:;:
costs of the entity for which hotel occupancy tax revenue may be used may not exceed the 1997 Legislation
portion of those administrative costs actually incurred in conducting the authorized activities. Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, to
changes in the law made by Acts 199
[See main volume for (g) to (j)J
Amended by Acts 1993,73rd Leg.,ch.680,§ 3,eff.Sept.1,1993; Acts 1995,74th Leg.,ch.1027,§ 1 eff. § 351.103. Allocation of lte�
Aug.28,1995.
i (a) At least 50 percent of the h
Historical and Statutory Notes population of 200,000 or greater
`. 351.101(a)(3). For municipalities
i 1993 Legislation chapter'; in subsec. (c),•in the second sentence p
_ oses provided by Section 351
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 680, § 3, in subds. substituted "quarterly"for"annually", substituted "'(1) if the tax rate in a muni
(a)(1) and (a)(5)(A) and (B) added references to "person with revenue for "person of "revenue" 1 room,not less than the amour
"visitor information centers"; in subsec.(b)substi- preceding"from the tax authorized", deleted"pro- I ";rate of one-half of one percent
1 tuted "shall be" for "is to be" following "by this vided by the municipality" at the end of the sen- 5
96
� i _
City Manager's Office
City of Beaumont
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Kyle Hayes.
Date: September 15, 1999
q I
Attached is information relating to the disparity study.
The first page is a breakdown of general improvement projects from 1991-1999. The second
page depicts the public works improvements for the same time period. The third page is a
breakdown of expenditures related to the Street Rehabilitation Program.
Also, attached is information related to the City's parks, fire station locations,police resource
allocations and EMS calls per ward. Please call if you have any questions related to the attached
information.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Completed Projects 1991 - 1998
City Funded Only (ward designation based on boundary in year of completion)
Year Project Ward I Ward II Ward III Ward IV Total
General Improvement Projects
1991 Texas Energy Museum 1,365,000 1,365,000
1992 Babe Zaharias Center 172,000 172,000
Park Improvements 324,000
Athletic Complex 203,000
Central Park 121,000
Fire Station#14 398,000 398,000
Riverfront Park Improvements 371,000 371,000
1994 Best Years Center 194,000 194,000
Health Department 240,000 240,000
1995 New Parks 138,000
Halbouty Park 83,000
Lefler Park 55,000
1996 Airport T-Hangers 314,000 314,000
Parks& Recreation Improvements 138,000
Chaisson Park 46,000
Rogers Park 44,000
Wuthering Heights Park 48,000
Fair Park Improvements 480,000 480,000
1997 Colliers Ferry Park 550,000 550,000
Julie Rogers Theatre- Foundation 410,000 410,000
Tyrrell Park 226,000 226,000
1998 Elmo Willard Library 591,000 591,000
Julie Rogers Theatrq-Site Development 255,000 255,000
1999 Alice Keith Swimming Pool 1,365,000 1,365,000
Total General Improvement Projects 584,000 561,000 4,434,000 1,952,000 7,531,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Completed Projects 1991 -1998
City Funded Only (ward designation based on boundary in year of completion)
Year Project Ward I _Ward 11 Ward 111 Ward IV Total
Public Works Projects
1991 Irving Street Box 500,000 500,000
Liberty-Laurel/Crockett Connector 3,300,000 3,300,000
Trinidad Outfall 100,000 100,000
1992 College Street 4,966,400 4,966,400
East Caldwood 1,470,000 1,470,000
Prince Street Outfall 500,000 500,000
Woodlands/Ditch 904 300,000 300,000
1993 High School Ditch 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
1994 Cartwright 10,100,000 10,100,000
1996 Major Drive (College to Hwy 105) 100,000 700,000 800,000
Liberty-Laurel 3,754,300 1,877,100 5,631,400
1997 Maury Meyers Overpass 8,050,000 8,050,000
West Lucas 9,850,000 250,000 10,100,000
South Park Relief 3,400,000 3,400,000
Twenty-Third 412,000 412,000 824,000
1998 Royal Street Outfall 825,000 825,000
Eleventh Street-Washington to Fannett 1,900,000 1,900,000
Folsom Road -Crow to Dowlen 1,500,000 1,500,000
1999 Chaison Street-Threadneedle to Harriot 156,000 156,000
Total Public Works Projects 25,466,300 2,832,000 11,568,500 16,056,000 55,922,800
TOTAL COMPLETED PROJECTS 26,050,300 3,393,000 16,002,500 18,008,000 63,453,800
STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM
SEVEN YEAR SUMMARY OF
EXPENDITURES BY WARD
WARD
YEAR 1 2 3 4 TOTAL
1991 $597,980 $510,480 $499,100 $411,600 2,019,160
1992 574,030 134,700 231,550 608,020 1,548,300
1993 &1994 628,980 311,030 37 5,430 535,880 1,851,320
1995 407,600 302,970 513,300 400,850 1,624,720
1996 269,000 246,000 345,000 693,000 1,553,000
1997&1998 453,000 121,000 324,000 259,000 1,157,000
1999 (Estimated) 255,000 497,000 3361000 303A350 1,391,000
TOTAL $3,185,690 $2,123,180 $2,621,380 $3,211 $11,144,500
PERCENT 28.58 19.05 23.55 28.82 100.00
LIST OF CITY PARKS BY WARDS
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
DR. LULU SMITH -WARD I
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Combest Park 2.80
Gilbert Park 2.07
Halbouty Park 6.04
Klein Park 28.75
Lefler Park 45.36
Wuthering Heights Park 19.95
TOTAL ACREAGE = 104.97
GUY N. GOODSON -WARD 11
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Athletic Complex 124.00
Caldwood Park 2.50
Forest Park 2.50
Perlstein Park 9.32
Rogers Park 15.49
TOTAL ACREAGE = 153.81
JOHN K. DAVIS -WARD III
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Babe Zaharias Park 26.97
Colliers Ferry Park 1232.00
Cottonwood Park 2.58
Fletcher Mini Park .20
JOHN K. DAVIS -WARD III (continued)
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Guseman Park 2.70
Ida Reed Park 2.25
Jacobs Park .50
New Carroll Street Park 2.60
Magnolia Park 16.85
Pine Street Park 8.64
Pipkin Park 4.91
Riverfront Park 4.15
Roberts Park 2.07
Wiess Park 2.76
TOTAL ACREAGE = 1,309.18
BOBBIE J. PATTERSON -WARD IV
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Alice Keith Park 14.14
Central Park 13.90
Chaison Park 2.10
Liberia Park 4.25
McLean Park 2.75
Sprott Park 10.00
Tyrrell Park/Cattail Marsh 516.00
TOTAL ACREAGE = 563.14
GRAND TOTAL OF ACREAGE = 2,131.10
PARK SITE STANDARDS
SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
MINI-PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COMMUNITY PARK REGIONAL PARK SPECIAL PARK
Acreage '/or less 5-10 20-40 100+ Varies
Service Area 1/4 neighborhood '/2 mile radius; one 1 to 2 mile radius; 3 to Entire city Varies, usually entire city
neighborhood 7 neighborhood
Population Served 500-1000 2,000-10,000 10,000 50,000 Entire city Varies, usually entire city
Location Corner lots on Near center of neighborhood Near convergence of Fringe of urbanized Varies, usually on major
minor streets in on collector or minor street, several neighborhoods area thoroughfare
densely developed ideally next to an elementary on major thoroughfare;
areas. school. access to public transit
desirable.
Facilities Playground Playground equipment, Playgrounds, picnic Picnic areas, Varies, usually special
e q u i p m e n t , picnic areas,shelter,wading areas, community playgrounds, golf athletic or cultural
benches, picnic pool, athletic field, softball center, jogging trails, course, nature trails, facilities.
area, hard-surface diamond, basketball courts; swimming pool, athletic ponds or small lakes,
play areas; varies varies with neighborhood fields, softball and athletic fields, scenic
with needs of needs. baseball diamonds. natural areas,softball
neighborhood. diamonds, unique
city-wide attractions,
such as botanical
gardens or zoos.
NOTE: In most cases,only some of the facilities listed for each park type will be provided in any one park. The intensity and extent of development of
each site will be determined on an individual basis,depending upon neighborhood needs,characteristics of the site and available funding.
Fire Station Locations
1. Number One Station 747 College Ward III
2. Number Two Station 4395 Ironton Ward III `
3. New Number Three Station 805 Woodrow Ward IV
4. Number Four Station 1301 Gladys Ward I
5. Number Six Station 1155 Glendale Ward II
6. Number Seven Station 1730 McFaddin Ward I
7. Number Eight Station 6297 Hwy. 105 Ward I
8. Number Nine Station 7010 Gladys Ward II
9. Number Ten Station 3855 Washington Ward IV
10. Number Eleven Station 2185 Sabine Pass Ward III
11. Number Fourteen Station 8250 Old Voth Rd. Ward I
12. Fire Training Center 600 Marina Dr Ward III
13, Fire Department Headquarters 400 Walnut Ward III
Stations Currently Unoccupied
14. Old Number Three Station 3895 Kenneth Ward IV
15. New Number Six Station 1880 S. Major Dr. Ward I1
16. Walden Road Station 6375 Walden Rd. Ward II
City of Beaumont
Police Department
'bOLIGF
Inter-Office Memo
Date: September 9, 1999
To: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
From: Tom Scofield, Chief of Police J,�p
Re: Ward Report ��
Attached you will find a report on the allocation of police resources according to ward. The data
collected is for the time period of October 1, 1998 through August 31, 1999.
Police Resource Allocation Per Ward
Using computer data,calls for service and calls assigned were determined for each respective ward.The
following table displays the breakdown of calls for service, calls assigned and the percentage of total calls
by ward.
Location Calls for Service Percentage Calls Assigned Percentage
Ward 1 37710 26.8% 2254 31.63%
Ward 2 15475 11% 698 9.69%
Ward 3 46768 33.24% 2203 30.91%
Ward 4 40743 28.96% 1972 27.67%
The department has several specialized units that provide service to citizens.The following table indicates
which ward each of the units are located in.
Specialized Units Location
Auto Theft Task Force Ward 4
Family Violence Task Force Ward 4
Police Athletic League Ward 4
Substations are an integral part of community policing and are located throughout the community.The
following table shows in which ward each is located in.
Substations Location
South Park Ward 4
Walmart Ward 1
St. Elizabeth Ward 1
Parkdale Mall Ward 1
Target Center Ward 1
Irving Ward 3
a
Officers assigned to the Housing Unit are responsible for specific housing complexes.These officers
provide services exclusively to the residents of the respective complexes.Officers also administer a variety
of programs for the residents.The following table displays the complexes,which ward they are located in
and the number of officers assigned to each complex.(Some officers are assigned to more than one
complex.)
Public Housing Complex Location Number of Officers Assigned
Northridge Manor Ward 3 2
CDS Ward 3 1
Pear Orchard Plaza Ward 4 2
Washington Manor Ward 4 2
Sunlight Manor Ward 4 1
Virginia Estates Ward 4 1
Magnolia Gardens Ward 3 2
Plymouth Village Ward 3 1
Tracewood I and II Ward 1 1
Park Shadows Ward 2 1
The DARE. Program is an important tool used to reduce drug and alcohol abuse among the youth of our
community.Currently the program is administered in area elementary schools.The following table shows
the number of schools in each ward in which the program is taught.
DA.R.E.Program
Location Number of Schools
Ward 1 3
Ward 2 5
Ward 3 6
Ward 4 5
BEAUMONT PUBLIC HEALTH EMS
CALLS PER WARDS
1996 -1999
WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV TOTAL CALLS
1996 1,324 1,033 4,314 3,957 10 628
1997 1,474 730 4,545 4,190 10,939
1998 1,542 1,276 4 991 4,300 12,1
R
e
City Manager's Office
City of Beaumont
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Kyle Hayes '
Date: September 15, 1999 I y
Attached is information relating to the disparity study.
The first page is a breakdown of general improvement projects from 1991-1999. The second
page depicts the public works improvements for the same time period. The third page is a
breakdown of expenditures related to the Street Rehabilitation Program.
Also, attached is information related to the City's parks, fire station locations, police resource
allocations and EMS calls per ward. Please call if you have any questions related to the attached
information.
r:.?•.. qf�-. '� w!=rJ '�.. t`'cy;?�•.'�I,. �.2`••`tia. '.•�"q.ya:.'sr? .Arrr t.. +�. a
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Completed Projects 1991 -1998
City Funded Only (ward designation based on boundary in year of completion)
K
Year Project Ward I Ward II Ward III Ward IV .. Total
General Improvement Projects
1991 Texas Energy Museum 1,365,000 ' 1,365,000
1992 Babe Zaharias Center 172,000 172,000
Park Improvements 324,000
Athletic Complex 203,000
Central Park 121,00.0
Fire Station#14 398,000 - 398,000
Riverfront Park Improvements 371,000 371,000
1994 Best Years Center 194,00 194,000
Health Department 240,000 240,000
1995 New Parks 138,000
Halbouty Park 83,000
Lefler Park 55,000
1996 Airport T-Hangers 314,000 314,000
Parks & Recreation Improvements 138,000
Chaisson Park .46,000
Rogers Park 44,000 +�
Wuthering Heights Park 48,000
Fair Park Improvements 480,000 480,000
1997 Colliers Ferry Park 550,000 550,000
Julie Rogers Theatre- Foundation 410,000 :" 410,000
Tyrrell Park 226,000 226,000
1998 Elmo Willard Library 591,000 591,000
Julie Rogers Theatre-Site Development 255,000 255,000
1999 Alice Keith Swimming Pool - _ _ 1,365,0P0 1,365,000
Total General Improvement Projects 584,000 561,000 4,434,000 1,952, q 0 7,531,000
i„
,t
K
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Completed Projects 1991 -1998 :
City Funded Only (ward designation based on boundary in year of completion)
Year Project Ward I Ward II Ward III Ward IV'; Total
Public Works Projects µ
1991 Irving Street Box w0,0Q0 500,000
Liberty-Laurel/Crockett Connector 3,300,000 3,300,000
Trinidad Outfall 100,000 ;. 100,000
1992 College Street 4,966,400 4,966,400
East Caldwood 1,470,000 1,470,000
Prince Street Outfall 500,000 500,000
Woodlands/Ditch 904 300,000 300,000
1993 High School Ditch 1 1,500,000 1,500,000
1994 Cartwright 10,100,000 10,100,000
1996 Major Drive (College to Hwy 105) 100,000 700,000 ; 800,000
Liberty-Laurel 3,754,300 1,877,100 5,631,400
1997 Maury Meyers Overpass 8,050,000 8,050,000
West Lucas 9,850,000 250,000 f 10,100,000
South Park Relief 3,400,00.0 3,400,000
Twenty-Third 412,000 412,000 . 824,000
1998 Royal Street Outfall 825,000 825,000
Eleventh Street-Washington to Fannett 1,900,00 1,900,000
Folsom Road -Crow to Dowlen 1,500,000 1,500,000
1999 Chaison Street-Threadneedle to Harriot ___ 156,0,00 156,000
Total Public Works Projects _ 25,466,300 2,832,000 11,568,500 16,056,00.0 55,922,800
TOTAL COMPLETED PROJECTS 26 050,300 3,393,000 16,002 500 18,008,000 63,453,800
:i.
STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM
SEVEN YEAR SUMMARY OF
EXPENDITURES BY WARD
WARD
YEAR 1 2 3 4 TOTAL
1991 $597,980 $510,480 $499,100 $411,600 2,019,160
1992 574,030 134,700 231,550 608,020 1,548,300
1993 &1994 628,980 311,030 375,430 535,880 1,851,320
1995 407,600 302,9701 513,300 400,850 1,624,720
1996 269,000 246,000 345,000 , 693,000 1,553,000
1997&1998 453,000 121,000 324,000 259,000 1,157,000
1999 (Estimated) 255,000 497,000 336,000 303,000 1,391,000
i
TOTAL $31185,590 1 $2,123,180 -$2,62 380 i . $3 211,3501 $11 144 500
PERCENT 28.58 1 19.05 23.55 1 28.82 100.00
...ti.. ,t'., :...,,� ..F •. .;r. •a1•; j.a �:'.c•. �ir'..µi-•.. .,i':r�•-:.�'t. >at� i::• 'rf.,..+�FM.:x _ .ti• :}+tti% •t'l; .:..�• ,
LIST OF CITY PARKS BY WARDS
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
DR. LULU SMITH -WARD I
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Combest Park 2.80
Gilbert Park 2.07
Halbouty Park 6.04
Klein Park 28.75
Lefler Park 45.36
Wuthering Heights Park 19.95
TOTAL ACREAGE = 104.97
GUY N. GOODSON -WARD 11
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Athletic Complex 124.00 .
Caldwood Park 2.50
Forest Park 2.50
Perlstein Park 9.32
Rogers Park 15.49
TOTAL ACREAGE = 153.81
. JOHN K. DAVIS -WARD 111
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
��i.•a;:'��
:V w•., •7 r1.: .r1'..•J::{' '�:Yom. :'FY.✓.�i? .cY ,'''a'• b :4: •:.ii','.r,- :� ..:'i.,, �:s:.. .-d ,.
Babe Zaharias Park 26.97
Colliers Ferry Park 1232.00
Cottonwood Park 2.58
Fletcher Mini Park .20
JOHN K. DAVIS -WARD III (continued)
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Guseman Park 2.70
Ida Reed Park 2.25
Jacobs Park .50
New Carroll Street Park 2.60
Magnolia Park 16.85
Pine Street Park 8.64
Pipkin Park 4.91
Riverfront Park 4.15
Roberts Park 2.07
Wiess Park 2.76
TOTAL ACREAGE = 1,309.18
BOBBIE J. PATTERSON -WARD IV
NAME OF PARK TOTAL ACREAGE
Alice Keith Park 14.14
Central Park 13.90
Chaison Park 2.10
Liberia Park 4.25
McLean Park 2.75
Sprott Park 10.00
Tyrrell Park/Cattail Marsh 516.00
." s'.. t.: ;.r':•i.�.1i`. ':rr,;r.': •'r e: �. :t:T;'1 .:J%.�:.. •fi;; !. r t• 4. r.r
TOTAL ACREAGE= r.. . . : 56 .y �
r
GRAND TOTAL OF ACREAGE = 2,131.10
PARK SITE STANDARDS '
' SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
#MINI-PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COMMUNITY PARK REGIONAL PARK SPECIAL PARK
Acreage t.Yz or less 5-10 20-40 100+ Varies
�r
Service Area _t.,1/4 neighborhood /Smile radius;one 1 to 2 mile radius; 3 to Entire city Varies, usually entire city
neighborhood 7 neighborhood
Population Served •x 500-1000 2,000-10,000 10,000-50,000 Entire city Varies,usually entire city
r
Location ~,Corner lots on Near center of neighborhood Near convergence of Fringe of urbanized Varies, usually on major
minor streets in on collector or minor street, several neighborhoods area thoroughfare
densely developed ideally next to an elementary on major thoroughfare;
areas. school access to public transit
desirable.
F a c i l i t i e s P l a y g r o u n d Playground equipment, Playgrounds, picnic Picnic areas, Varies, usually special
e q u i p m e n t , picnic areas,shelter,wading areas, community playgrounds, golf athletic or cultural
r`benches, picnic pool, athletic field, softball center, jogging trails, course, nature trails, facilities.
:.area,. hard-surface diamond, basketball courts; swimming pool, athletic ponds or small lakes,
play areas; varies varies with neighborhood fields, softball and athletic fields, scenic
with needs of needs. baseball diamonds. natural areas,softball
neighborhood. diamonds, unique
city-wide attractions,
such as botanical
r gardens or zoos.
NOTE: In most case ,only some of the facilities listed for each park type will be provided in any one park. The intensity and extent of development of
each site will 6e determined on an individual basis,depending upon neighborhood needs, characteristics of the site and available funding.
b9/03/19yy by: 27 tib7bo��»� _
Fire Station Locations
1. Number one Station 747 College Ward III
2. Number Two Station 4395 Ironton Ward III `
3. New Number Three Station 805 Woodrow Ward IV
4. Number Four Station 1301 Gladys Ward I
- 5. Number Six Station 1155 Glendale Ward II
6. Number Seven Station 1730 McFaddin Ward I
7. Number Eight Station 6297 Hwy. 105 Ward 1
8. Number Nine Station 7010 Gladys Ward II
9. Number Ten Station 3855 Washirigton Ward IV
10. Number Eleven Station 2185 Sabine Pass Ward III
11. Number Fourteen Station 8250 Old Voth Rd. Ward I
12. Fire Training Center 600 Marina Dr Ward III
13. - Fire Department Headquarters 400 Walnut Ward III
Stations Currently Unoccupied
14. Old Number Three Station 3895 Kenneth Ward IV
15. New Number Six Station 1880 S. Major Dr. Ward Q
•f ,.. :: 4i ?Zoa�i Station 6375 Walden Rd. Ward II
h * Sr...i •.'r'^-q �: .. .. 'i. ..`A• ,i«ti W' +!' - ; yam''. .. n..;.;
City of Beaumont
Police Department
pocks
Inter-Office Memo
Date: September 9, 1999
To: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
From: Tom Scofield, Chief of Police 41
Re: Ward Report
Attached you will find a report on the allocation of police resources according to ward. The data
collected is for the time period of October 1, 1998 through August 31, 1999.
Police Resource Allocation Per Ward
Using computer data,calls for service and calls assigned were determined for each respective ward.The
following table displays the breakdown of calls for service, calls assigned and the percentage of total calls
by ward.
Location Calls for Service Percentage Calls Assigned Percentage
Ward 1 37710 26.8% 2254 31.63%
Ward 2 15475 11% 698 9.69%
Ward 3 46768 33.24% 2203 30.91%
Ward 4 40743 28.96% 1972 27.67%
The department has several specialized units that provide service to citizens.The following table indicates
which ward each of the units are located in.
Specialized Units Location
Auto Theft Task Force Ward 4
Family Volence Task Force Ward 4
Police Athletic League Ward 4
Substations are an integral part of community policing and are located throughout the community.The
following table shows in which ward each is located in.
Substations Location
South Park Ward 4
Walmart Ward 1
St. Elizabeth Ward 1
Parkdale Mall Ward 1
Target Center Ward 1
Irving Ward 3
r
Officers assigned to the Housing Unit are responsible for specific housing complexes.These officers
provide services exclusively to the residents of the respective complexes. Officers also administer a variety
of programs for the residents.The following table displays the complexes,which ward they are located in
and the number of officers assigned to each complex. (Some officers are assigned to more than one
complex.)
Public Housing Complex Location Number of Officers Assigned
Northridge Manor Ward 3 2
CDS Ward 3 1
Pear Orchard Plaza Ward 4 2
Washington Manor Ward 4 2
Sunlight Manor Ward 4 1
Virginia Estates Ward 4 1
Magnolia Gardens Ward 3 2
Plymouth Village Ward 3 1
Tracewood I and 11 Ward 1 1
Park Shadows Ward 2 1
The DA.R.E. Program is an important tool used to reduce drug and alcohol abuse among the youth of our
community.Currently the program is administered in area elementary schools.The following table shows
the number of schools in each ward in which the program is taught.
D.A.R.E. Program
Location Number of Schools
Ward 1 3
Ward 2 5
Ward 3 6
Ward 4 5
. . :aa ':f. ... :y .. ':�":-�.w •rl.. 's: ,. oaf..s;• S"• .:�••�::- ....;D,r• .+{a.�" '#��:'}.d.'.ii.�t�•.2.}<'.�d+F..:�:I'�:1. .. •• `'"_ .
t
BEAUMONT PUBLIC HEALTH EMS
CALLS PER WARDS 4
1996 -1999
w
WARD I WARD 11 WARD 111 WARD IV TOTAL CALLS
1996 1,324 1 033 4,314 3,957 `:4� 1016,0128
1997 1,474 730 4,545 4,190 10,939
1998 1,542 1,2-1 4 991 4,300 12,109
. w
' w
• •1
r
1
.3.
' ti
CITY OF BEAUMONT
a*i+,a PUBLIC WORKS
am-
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 15, 1999
TO: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Transit Monthly Report
COMMENTS
Attached is a copy of the Beaumont Transit System balance sheet for the month of
August, 1999. Please attach this copy to the Monthly Report submitted by Public
Works.
1 cvl"-
Tom Warner
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST. 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MOUTH I►ICREASE
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR DECREASE-CR
--------- --------- -----------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH AND CASH ITEMS 1,877 1,843 34
RECEIVABLES-TRADE 2,060 1,160 90
-PUBLIC FUNDING 245,684 166,416 77,2:56
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
FUEL AND OIL 2,502 21790 288CR
PARTS 36:197 355287 91.1
NORM. IN PROCESS 0 0 0
OTHER ASSETS 6,959 7,224 36 1R
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 295,179 216.720 78,457
GRANT ASSETS
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 0 0 0
BUSES 0 0 0
OTHER PROPERTY 0 0 0
TOTAL GRANT ASSETS 0 0 0
CONSUMED IN OPERATIONS 0 0 .0
NET VALUE GRANT ASSETS 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS 295.179 216.720 78,459
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS FAYABLE-TRADE 40,768 22,982 17,78.5
-CITY 0 0 0
ACCRUED PAYROLL LIABILITIES 145,393 136,536 5,857
ACCRUED TAX LIABILITIES 47 95 46CR
OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES 40,865 7,298 33,567
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 227073 166;911 60;162
RESERVE FOR INJURIES & DAMAGES 30,777 32,500 19.297
CAPITALIZATION
WORKING CAPITAL-CITY 0 0 0
GRANT CAPITAL-FEDERAL 0 0 0
-STATE 0 0 0
-LOCAL 0 0 0
-OTHER 17.309 17,309 0
TOTAL GRANT CAPITAL 17,309 17,309 0
LESS ERANT CAPITAL CONSUMED 0 0 0
NET GRANT CAPITAL 17009 17,309 0
UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION 17,309 17,309 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL 295,179 216.720 76.459
------------------------------BEAUMONT TRANSIT-SYSTEM--------_------------OF'ERA1IOWS-STATEMENT FOR-MOUTH-OF AUGUST 31, 1999
- - - - ----------------
0 N T H YEAR 10 DATE
OVER/UND-CR - - - - - - - OVER/UND-CR
AMOUNT BUDGET BUDGET z AMOUNT BUDGET BUDGET %
-------- ----------- ------------------
-------- ----------- ------------------
REVENUES
44,276 43,350 926 2.1 PASSENGER 457,194 458,450 1,256CR 0.3GR
160 1,667 1,507CR 90.4CR CHARTER 14,739 18,333 3,595CR 19.6CR
0 (1 0 0.0 ADVERTISING 2,000 0 21 000 100,0
0 0 0 0.0 OTHER 0 0 0 0.0
171,898 208,828 16,940CR 9.ICR PUBLIC FUNDING 1,968,584 2,247,168 278.564ER 12,4CP,
2361'124 253,B45 17,521CR 6.9CR TOTAL GROSS REVENUES 2,442,516 2;723,951 281,435CR 10,3CR
E PENSES
LABOR
75,324 81,729 5,405CR 7,8CR DRIVERS 720,998 864,35 03,327CR 9.60
8,663 91997 1;334CR 13,3CR REPAIRS 100,166 105,727 5,559CR 5.3CR
9,373 9,571 198CR 2.1CR SERVICIIG 101,881 101,217 664 0.7
7,886 8,021 135CR 1.7CR SUPERVISION 86 629 87 866 1,237CR 1.4CR
6,520 61630 IIOCR 1.7CR OTHER LADCR 71;817 72,622 0051R 1.ICR
107,766 1151948 8,1B2CR 7,1CR TOTAL LABOR 1,141,493 1,231,757 90.2641R 7.SCR'
FRINGE BENEFITS
0,753 9.752 999CR 10,2CR PAYROLL TAXES 9R,808 103,130 4,322CR 4.2CR
18,780 21;177 2,397CR 11.3CR GROUP INSURANCE 195,056 232.947 37,871CR 16.3Ck
9,114 9,518 404CR 4,2CP, WORKER'S COMPENSATION 82;699 l00 655 1 456GR 17,8CR
8,831 9,402 571CR 6,1CR FEIISION 75,223 99;430 1.?07CR 1,2CR
4,498 8,647 051 9.8 FRINGE PAY 109,652 115,444 51792CR 5,OCR
2,264 2:350 96CR 4.1CR OTHER 21,790 24 963 3,165CR 12.7CR
57,240 60.056 3.516CR 5,9CR TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 606;236 676.56? 70,333CR 10.4CR
MATERIPLS L SUPPLIES C614SUMED
14,232 12,459 1,773 1412 FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 115,347 131,761 16,414CR 12.518
3,055 4,053 996CR 24.6CR TIRES AND TUBES 35,641 42,860 7.219CR 15.8CR
14,396 16,256 1,960CR 12.0CR REPAIR PARTS 143, 70 172,977 23,4(,7CR 17,0CR
?:762 4,640 1;678CR 36,2CR MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING 41,06 49:076 2 000CR 16.3CR
4;449 3,540 2,049CR 57,BCR OTHER SUPPLIES 33,389 37:521 4,132CR 11.0CR
36,144 41.0,35 4,912CR 12.0CR TOTAL MATERIALS b SUP CONSUMED 369,023 434,195 65,172CR 15,0CF
17,974 17,403 571 3.3 PURCHASED SERVICES 193,459 ID4,045 596CR (1.3c,;.1,814 2.115 901CR 33,2CR UTILITIE5 22,00? 23,717 6.?C8CR
22.4CR
5,395 9:866 4,47ICR 45.3CR INSURANCE 59,113 104,334 4„216CR 43,3CR
4,219 3,=!5 253 6.4 TAXES AND LICENSES 40,',07 41,942 1,235CR 2.9CR
5:773 2,01` 3,733 183.7 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 20,471 22,392 l,?21Ck. 0,6CR
0 0 ) 0.0 LEASES AND RENTALS (� (� i) 0,0
0 0 0 0,0 DEPRECIATION AND AMDRTI2ATION 0 v t. (i,p
0 0 0 0.0 GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED 0 (; 0 0
216,325 2`3.0;5 17,520CR 6.9CR TOTAL-EXPENSES 2.442.515 2,723,?51 291,435CR 1(�.3CR
IDE 0 1CR 100.00R OTHER INCOME AND EXFENSE C. 0.0
0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0.0
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM 'SELECTIVE ANALYSIS FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
-- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE TWELVE .40NTHS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR n OVER UWD-CR X
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC
---------------------- ------- ---------------------- ------- ----------------------- -------
REVENUES
FASSEIIGER 44,276 8,624 24.2 457.194 39,866 9.6 498,277 43.128 9.5
CHARTER 160 720CR 811BCR 14;738 4,312CR 22,6CR 15,268 7,492CR 32.4CR
ADVERTISING 0 0,0 2110()0 2,000 00.0 2,000 3;000 A.0
OTHER 0 0 010 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.i,
PUBLIC FUNDING 191,888 47,760 33.1 1,968,584 191,682 10.8 2,136,429 127,964 6.4
TOTAL GROSS REVENUES 2361324 55,664 30.8 2,442,516 229.238 10,4 2,651;974 165.610 6.7
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIVERS 75,324 18,699 33.0 760,998 140,168 21.9 835,672 142.255 20.5
REPAIRS 8,663 303 4.6 1001 168 12;725 14.6 107.436 12;557 13.2
SERVICING 7 373 1,062 12.8 101 881 11,448 12.7 Ii0.380 12,321 12.6
SUPERVISION 7,886 X230 3.0 86,629 2;576 3.1 94,285 2,852 3.1
OTHER LABOR 6;120 198 3.1 71,817 2,4cn 3.5 73.136 2,959 3.0
TOTAL LABOR 107.766 20,572 23.6 1,141 493 169:337 17.4 1,225;911 112;844 15.4
FRINGE BENEFIT'
PAYROLL TAXES 2,753 1,752 25.0 931808 13,342 15.6 1!15,54? 13.83() 1`.1
GROUP INSURANCE 18,760 2,059 12.3 195;056 20 523 17.1 212,237 31.436 17.4
WORKER'S COMPENSATION 9,114 1;441 25.3 02,649 4,4.`,4CR 5.1CR 87;730 3,937CR 4.2CR
PENSION 8,831 1,746 24.6 98,223 12,100 14,0 105,136 12,614 13.6
FRINGE PAY ?,^98 1113()3 15.4 104,652 3,4481IR 3.1CR 106;084 10.715CR 9.2CR
OTHER 2,264 1,095 93.7 21;798 105 n.5 23,467 968 4,3
TOTAL FRINGE BE1_EFITS 57,24' 9,196 20,6 606;236 4.5.110 8.2 642,202 44.146 7.4
MATERIALS 6 SUPPLIES CONSUMED
FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 14,232 6,155 76.2 115,347 5,743 5.2 124,743 3,618 3.0
TIRES AND TUBES 3;055, 484 18.8 35,641 562CR 1.6CR 36;662 794CP 2,0CR
REPAIR PARTS 14,376 8.516 144.8 143,570 8 i27CF 5.4CR 153,723 17,264CR 10.1CR
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING 2,962 1;1BBCR 2B.6CR 41,076 21613CR 6.00R 43.310 4,930LR l0.2CR
OTHER SUPPLIES 1.499 11142 328.3 33,391 4.858 17.0 39;964 1,161 21.9
TOTAL MATERIALS & SUP CONSUMED 36;144 15,159 72.2 369.025 721CR n,2CR 400.402 12;17 9GR 3.0CR
FURCPASED SERVICES 17,974 4,()74 29.3 103,459 12,5+2 7.3 1?7.625 13.10
UTiLITTES 1.814 476 35.6 22 004 3;60mrCR 14,ICR 23.264 4 625CR 16.6CR
INSURANCE 5;3?5 1,675 45.0 59,11+3 247CR n.4CR 97,370 40,937CR 33.4CR
TAXES AND LICENSES 4,219 872 26.8 40;707 5,480 15.6 43,972 5,374 14.0
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 5;773 3,022 109.9 20.471 330 1.7 21;291 3.164CR 13.00R
LASES AW RENTALS y r? 0 0.0 i' 0 010 0 n p 0
DEFRECIATION AND AuORTI ATION 0 0 0.0 0 0 i).0 0 11", 0
GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED 0� 0 0.0 0 0 6.0 0 r, ,
TOTAL EXPENSES 226,325� -.5,666 .3003 2,442,518 229,238 10.4 2,651,945 165,6()6 1.7
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE 1DR 2CR 200.00 2DR 0 0.0 29 4 1610
TOTAL, 0 0 0.0 0 0 r,,0 0 0 0.0
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM SELECTIVE ANALYSIS FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
' CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE TWELVE MONTHS
OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC, THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC
--------------------- ------- ---------------------- ------- ----------------------- -------
STS OPERATION
REVENUES
PASSENGER 21253 349CR 13.4CR 25 567 5,244CR 17.00R 2B,771 5,028CR 14.9CR
TOTAL REVENUES 2,c53 349CR 13.4CR 25,567 5,244CR 17,OCR 28,771 5,028L'R 14.9CR
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIV;RS 16,034 1,909 13.5 161,852 5,124 3.3 175,853 5,953 3.5
REPAIRS 0 0 0.0 0 50ER 100.OCR 0 50CR 100.00R
SERVICING 1,585 473 42.5 16,744 3,358 EE"5.1 .18,181 3,540 24.2
SUPERVISION 0 0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0
OTHER LABOR 0 0 010 0 O 0,fu 0 0 0.0
TOTAL LABOR 17,619 2,382 15.6 1713.596 8032 5.0 194.034 9,451 5.1
FRINGE BENEFITS
PAYROLL TAXES 1,416 37 2.7 15.953 638CCR 4.2CR 17.210 574CR 3.2CR
GROUP INSURANCE 31039 255ER 7.7CR 31,224 9681R 3.00R 34.684 346ER 1.OLR
WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1,47; 42 2.9 13,567 3.282CR 19.5CR i4,9B3 3.161CR 17.4CR
PENSION 1,429 33 2.4 1-5,706 872ER 5.3CR 17,096 752CR 4.2CR
FRINGE PAY 1,536 79CR 4.9CR 17439 4.298CR 1".7CR 16,76? 5,743;F. 25.5CF,
OTHER t 367 136 58.9 3,479 ?26CR 17.3CR 3,814 55lCR 12.6CR
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 9,262 861--R 0.9CA 97,318 10,634CR 11l.,)CR 104,558 11,1E7CR 9.61R
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES CONSUMED
FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 1,290 287 29.6 11,243 2,401CR 17.6CR 12,321 3,08OCR 20.00R
TIRES AND TUBES 1,081 1,081 10010 4.669 c,112CR 31.1Ck 5,071 2.190CR 3O.2LR
REPAIR PARTS 4,602 3,890 546.3 29 696 10,700 5?.5 31;250 12,2:1 64.1
M41NTENANEE AND SERVICING 0 0 0.0 0 O 0.0 0 0 0.0
OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0.0 210 210 100.0 210 210 0.0
TOTAL MATERIALS b SUP CONSUMED 6,973 51258 306.6 44,818 6,397 16.6 48,852 7,151 17.1
PURCHASED SERVICES 0 0 0.0 5,408 3,930 265.9 5,663 4,145 273.1
UTILITIES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
INSURANCE 0
0.0 0 0 0.0 A O,
TAXES AND LICENSES 444 2,897CR 86.8CR 4,274 5 C,
,2bBCR 55.2CR 4,699 5.277CR 52.9CR
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 t1 0 0.0
LEASES AND RENTALS 0 0 0.0 ;► 0 0,p 0 0 0.0
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTI2ATIO 0 0 0.0 0 O 0,0 0 0 1).0
GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED 0 0.0
TOTAL EXPENSES 34,294 4.667 . 15.8 330,414 2,657 0.8 357.806 4,343 1.2
PUBLIC FUNDING REQUIRED 32,041DR 5,OlbCR 18.6CR 304,047DR 7,901CR 2.7CR 329,035DR 9,371CR 2.9CR
TOTAL 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 n 0 0 ,;
--BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM SELECTIVE AN LYSiS FOR AUG95T 51, 15;5
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE I W E L V E MONTHS
OVER UND-CR x - - - - - - OVER UND-CR - - % - - - - -- OVER UND-CR i.
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR I4C THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC
----- ------- ---------------------- ------- ----------------------- -------
LINEH9UL OPERATION
------------------
REVENUES
PASSENGER 42.023 8.973 21.1 431,627 45,112 11.7 469,506 1+8.156 11.4
CHARTER 160 720CR 81.BCR 14=738 41312CR 22,6CR 15,269 7,492CR 32.9CR
ADVERTISING 0 0 0.0 2,000 21000 100.0 2,i;00 2,000 0.0
OTHER 0 0 0,0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
TOTAL REVENUES 425183 8,253 24.3 448,365 42,800 10.6 ;24,774 42,6 74 9.6
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIVERS 59,290 16,790 39.5 619,146 135,044 27.9 659.819 136,302 26.0
REPAIRS 8,663 3B3 4.6 100,168 12,775 14.6 107:436 12 607 13.3
SERVICING 7,788 589 8.2 85,137 9 090 10.:5 92 199 3,i73 10.5
SUPERVISION 71866 230 3.0 86 629 2 576 3.1 94,285 2,852 3.1
OTHER LABOR 6,520 198 3.1 71;817 2.420 3.5 78,139 2,859 3.8
TOTAL LABOR 904147 18,190 25.3 962,897 160,905 20.1 1,0311877 163,393 18.8
FRINGE BENEFITS
PAYROLL TAXES 7,337 1,715 30.5 82,955 14,030 20.4 88.338 14,104 13.5
GROUP INSURANCE 15.741 c 314 17.2 163,832 29,491 22.0 177:553 31.782 21.8
WORVER1 COMPENSAT13N 7;b39 1.799 30.8 69,132 1,172CR 1.7CR 74,747 776;8 !.00R
FENSION 7,402 1;713 30.1 82;517 12,972 1B.7 98,03? 13,366 17.;
FRINGE PAY ?,962 1,382 21.0 92,163 Boo 0.9 89,315 4,97cCR 5.3CR
HER 1,8,7 959 102.2 18,:19 931 4.0 19 K2 1.51 '
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 47,978 9,692 25.9 508,918 56,952 lc.b 537,644 55;329 118;5
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES CONSUMED
FUEL & LUBRICANTS 12.942 5,368 83.0 104.104 8,144 O.5 112,422 6.698 6.3
TIRE AND TUBES 1,974 597ER 23.2CR 30,972 1,530 5.2 33.591 1.406 4.4
REPAIR FARTS 9,794 4 626 89.5 114,874 19,827CR 14.1CR 122,473 29 475CR 19.4CR
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING 2,962 1;188CR 26.6CR 41;076 2.613CR 6.00R 43:310 4;93UCR 10.2CR
OTHER SUPPLIES 1,499 1,192 3x8.3 33,191 4:648 16,3 39,154 6.9il 21.3
TOTAL MATERIALS b SUP CONSUMED 29;171 91901 51.4 324,207 7,118CR 2.1CR 351,5511 19:330Ck 5.2CR
PURCHASED SERVICES 17,974 4,074 27.3 178,051 8,612 5.1 191.962 7,962 4.3
UTILITIES 1,814 476 35.6 22,009 3,609CR 14,1Ck 23'264 ur i rR
4 62 R 6.6 r,
INSURANCE 5,395 1.675 45.0 59.119 247CR 0.4CR 97;373 48,927CR 33.4CR
TAXES AND LICENSES 3,779 3,779 100,0 36;433 10,740 41.9 39,173 10,651 37.2
MISCELLANEOUS E�FEN;ES 5,173 3,022 109.9 20,471 X339 l,7 c1.291 3�184CR 13.0 fi
LEASE„ AND RENTALS 0 0 0,0 0 0 010 0 , C'
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.1) Li rl 010 GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED ;? 0 0.0 r �
0.0
TOTAL EXPENSES 202,031 50,999 33.8 2,112,104 226,591 12.0 2,294,139 161,26 7.6
PUBLIC FUNDING REQUIRED 159,84BDR 42,746CR 36.5CR 1,663,739DR 183,781CR 12.4CR 11807,365DR llB.599CR 7,OCR
TOTAL 0 0 0.0 0 0
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM
REVENUE AND COST PER MILE REPORT FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - CURRENT M 0 N T H - - - - - - TWELVE M011THS - - -
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR.
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
COST COST COST COcT COST COST
AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER AMOUNT PER AMOUNT FER PER
MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
REVENUES
PASSENGER REVENUE 42,023 .5680 33,050 .5300 .0380- 469,506 .5560 421,350 .5597 .0037
SPECIAL TRANSIT FARES 2,253 .0305 2,602 .0417 ,0112 28,771 .0341 33,799 .0447 .0108
CHARTER REVENUE 160 .0022 800 .0141 .0119 15.269 .01'1 22,750 ,0302 .0121
ADVERTISIN6 REVENUE 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 2,000 ,0(124 0 .0000 .0024-
OTHER REVENUE 0 .0000 0 10000 .0000 0 ,0000 0 .0000 .0000
PUBLIC FUNDING 191,898 2.593? 144,128 2.3112 .2825- 2,136.429 2.529' 2,008.465 2.600 .1391
TOTAL 68055 REVENUES 236,324 3.1943 180,660 2.B?70 .297.3- 2,651;974 .3.1405 2.496.364 3.3029 562''+
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIVERS WAGES 75.324 1.0181 56.625 .9080 .1101 835,672 .9896 693.417 .9211 .0695
LABOR FOR REPAIRS 8,663 .1171 B;280 .1328 .0157- 1071366 .1271 94,8;9 .1260 .0011
ACCIDENT AND VANDALISM i) ,0000 4 .0000 .0000 0 .0901) 0 ,0000 ,005;0
SERVICING LABOR 9,373 .1267 8,311 .1333 .0i+66- 110,30 .1307 98,05"r .13:13 .0004
BUILDINGS GROUNDS 1 EQUIPMENT 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 70 .0101 A 10000 ,0001
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISION 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 0 .000'? .0000
TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISION 7,886 .1066 7,656 .122B .O W- 94,285 .1117 71,433 .1"15 .0078-
ADMINISTRATIVE 6,520 .0861 6;322 ,1014 .0133- 7p,138 .0925 75,279 .10(10 .0075-
TOTAL LABOR 107;766 1.4566 87;194 1.3982 .0584 1,225,911 1.4517 1,((53,067 1.3789 .0528
FRINGE BENEFITS
---------------
SOCIAL SECURITY 8,715 .1178 6,955 .1115 .0063 101,217 .1199 83,018 .1169 ,0030
PENSION 8,831 .1194 7,065 .1136 .0055 105;136 .1245 92,522 .1229 .0016
GROUP INSURANCE 18,730 .2535 16,721 .2691 .!143- 212.237 .2513 180,8+)1 .2402 .0111
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 39 .0005 46 .0007 .0002- 4,331 .001 3,700 .0049 .0602
WOFK:ER S CD'FENSATION 9,114 .1232 7,273 .116E .0(166 99,130 .106'3 53,667 .1244 i'181-
SiCK,. PAY 3 1000 .0405 3,000 .0481 .0076- 20.765 0246 28,250 0375 .Ol"9-
H13LIDAY PAY 264 .0036 171 .0027 .0009 1;'648 10230 24;076 .0320 %40-
VACATION PA'! 5,150 .0696 4,67: .0750 .0054- 47,080 .515.8 56.099 .074`, 0187
VACATION
PAID ABSENCE 11034 .0147 347 .0056 .0071 14.591 .0173 8.314 .1111 .0062
OTHER FRINGE BENEFITS 2,264 .0306 1,169 .0187 .0119 23.4=17 .0218 22,449 ,6299 ."021-
TOTAL FRINGE EENEFITE 57,240 ,7737 47,444 .7608 ,1129 64?,202 .7605 598,016 .7544 .0337-
.
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM
REVENUE ACID COST PER MILE REPORT FOR AUGUST 31, 199;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH - - - - - - TWELVE M0NT4S - - -
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR.
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
COST COST COST COST COST COST
A IN,OLRIT PER AMOUNT FER PER AM0UIIT PER AMOUNT PER PER
MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
MATERIALS 6 SUPPLIES CONSUMED
-----------------------------
FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 14,232 .1924 8,077 .1295 .0629 124,743 .1477 121,125 .160- .0132-
TIRES AND TUBES 3.055 .0413 21571 .0412 .0001 38.662 .0458 39,446 .0524 .0066-
REPAIR PARTS 14,396 .1946 5,552 .0890 .1056 150,087 ,1777 168.320 .2236 .0459-
REFAIR PARTS ACCIDENT t VANDAL 0 .0000 32B .0053 .0053- 3,636 .0043 2.667 .0033 .0008
SERVICING SUPPLIES 1,439 .0195 2,045 .0328 .0133- 19.926 .0235 21,595 .0287 .0051-
]THER MAINTENANCE 1.523 .0206 2,105 .0338 .0132- 23,384 .02;7 26.645 .035+ .007-
OTHER TRANSPORTATION 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 ,OO;i0 0 10000 .0060
OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,512 .0204 311' .0050 .0!54 21,7J0 .1258 13.772 ?249 .001'9
MARKETING SCHEDULES ETC 13- 00[12- 3- .0000 .0002- 14.550 0172 13,051 .0173 0001-
OTHER SUPPLIES 0 .0000 0 ,0000 .10000 3.654 .01143 969 .Ob13 .0Q6 TOTAL MATERIALS d SUP CONSUMED 36,144 .4885 20,935 .3365 .1520
400,402 .4742 412,591 .5481 .073--
PURCHASED SERVICES
------------------
MANAGEMENT FEE 7.983 .1019 7,742 .1241 .0162- 95 555 .1132 92,W .1231 .�099-
ACMINISTRATIVE BILLING 0 .0000 0 ,0000 .0000 � 0 .0000 � 0 .0000 .0000
CLAIMS ADJUSTERS & ATTORNEYS 5,329 .0720 2,327 .0373 .0347 35,568 .0422 35,122 ,0467 ,ri114r-
OTHER 41662 .0630 3,631 .0614 .0016 66,402 .0786 57,734 .0767 .0'019
TOTAL PURCHASED SERVICES 17,974 .2429 13,900 .2229 .0200 1rii,625 .21.40 185,51- ,E464 .01^c4-
UTILITIES 1.814 .0245 1.330 .0215 .0030 23.264 .027, 27,889 .0370 .0095-
INSURANCE
PREMIUMS FOR PL t PD 3,361 .0454 3,t80 .0590 .0136- 40,177 .0476 44,156 .0587 .ii111-
PRDVISION FOR FL b PD 2:219 .0300 1;871 .03!10 ,0000 58,501 .0693 1113:034 .1379 .068E-
DTHEP,' INSURANCE 1B5- .0025- 1,831- .0294- .0269 1,300- .0415- 1,685- ,0022- .0007
TOTAL INSURANCE 5,395 .0729 3,720 .0597 .0132 97,378 .1153 1461305 ,1944 .0791-
TAXES
FUEL AND LUBRICANT TAXES 4,219 .0570 3,327 .0534 .0036 43.812 .0520 :8,4?6 .0511 .0009
OTHER TAXES AND LICENSES 0 10000 0 .0400 .0004 0 .0000 0 ,0600 ,0000
TOTAL TAXES 4,219 ,0570 3,327 ,115534 .0036 43.872 .0520 8.4?8 ,0311 .0009
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM
REVENUE AND COST PER MILE REPORT FOR AU6U3T 31, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH - - - - - - TWELVE MONTHS -
-
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR 1"ICR.
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
COST COST COST COST COST COST
AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PE°
MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
r.ISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
----------------------
DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 .0000 677 .0109 .0109- 2,351 .0029 2,923 .0040 .0012-
TRAVEL AND MEETINGS 374 .0051 0 .0000 .0051 1,261 .0015 4:610 .0061 .0046-
BRIDGE TOLLS 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 C. .0000 .0000
ADVERTISING 5.286 .0714 2,02B .0325 .0389 15,002 .0179 14,92` ,0198 .0019-
OTHER EXFENSE 113 .0015 46 .0007 .0008 2,597 .031 1,957 .0026 .0005
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 5,773 .0700 2,751 .0441 .0339 21.271 .0252 24,475 .0325 .0073-
LEASES AND RENTALS 0 .00GO 0 .000'? .0000 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0009
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 U .0000 .0000
GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED 0 .0000 0 10000 .0000 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000
TOTAL EXPENSES 236,325 3.1943 IBO,659 2.8970 .2973 2,651.945 3.1404 2,486,339 3.3029 .1625-
.
----------BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM -OPERATING STATISTICS-FOR- AUGUST, 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - ---------------
CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE TWELVE MONTHS
-------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 CITY
01 ADULT CASH 32,740 2B,488 347,637 310.039 31/6.388 339,278
02 ADULT TICKETS 0 0 557 284 557 284
03 SENIOR CITIZEN CASH 7,177 6,289 79,153 72,225 85,220 79,188
04 ELDERLY S HANDICAPPED 0 0 0 325 0 325
07 STUDENT CASH 22,924 17,836 221,728 1B91531 239,983 206,911
08 YOUTH N/TRANSFER 52 64 3,298 1,701 3,343 1,786
11 PASS RIDERS 10,594 9,455 107,237 95,55u 116,706 103,240
12 SPECIAL FARE 0 7 6,412 16,761 6;412 161761
t5 REDUCED FARE PASS 5,728 4.781 61.661 53:534 67,11? 58,bB0
16 ADULT W/TRANSFER 853 650 6;589 6 955 7,282 7,500
20 CASH TRANSFERS 0 0 0 ` 0 ' 0 0
21 FREE TRANSFERS 33,399 26,086 336,273 282,822 362,096 303,984
22 FREE FASSENGERS 0 0 20 0 20 0
90 SCHEDULE MILES 57,627 45,091 604,274 457,425 653.266 540,732
91 CHARTER MILES 21 169 4,046 4,372 4;111 4,995
92 NON REVENUE NILES 906 1,006 71 618 12,330 B,422 13,30?
TOTAL REVENUE PA_SEIICERS 90,063 66,570 834,462 746.4(15 9021910 8131961
REVENUE PASSENGERS PER MILE 1.384 1.476 1.370 1.502 1.282 1.505
AVERAGE FARE PER PASSENGER .5249 .4965 .517;3 .5175 .5142 .5177
2 ST:
05 STS-CASH 752 691 7,273 7,474 81009 8,113
06 STS-TICKETS 155 103 11698 1,093 1;795 1,211
12 STS PASS 1,103 1,273 10;790 13,734 12;116 15;132
13 STS - SPECIAL FARE 0 0 0 b3 0 63
90 SCHEDULE MILES 15,529 16,095 162,426 177,025 178,657 193,750
TOTAL REVENUE PASSENGERS 2,010 2,067 19,751 22059 21,920 24,519
REVENUE PASSENGERS PER MILE .129 128 .122 .126 123 .127
AVERAGE FARE PER PASSENGER 1.1209 1.2588 1.2030 1.2620 1.2302 1.2721
COMPANY TOTALS
TOTAL TRANSFER PASSENGERS 33,389 26,086 336,293 232,822 362,116 308,884
TOTAL REVENUE PASS 82,078 68,637 854,213 769.264 924.830 638;420
TOTAL PASSENGERS 115,467 94.723 1,190,506 1,!752,066 1,286,946 1.141.3.54
TOTAL BUS MILES OPERATED 73,483 62,361 783,364 691,152 844;456 '7;:2;784
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM FARE STRUCTURE AUGUST ,19-79
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FRIOR EFFECTIVE CURRENT EFFECTIVE
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
1 CITY
01 ADULT CASH 4.50 1/01/94 S.75 1101/95
02 ADULT TICKETS 532.50 11/15/09 5113.75 1/01195
03 SENIOR CITIZEN CASH 4.15 10/16/75 1.35 1/O1/95
04 ELDERLY S HANDICAPPED 10/11.50 12/17/90 10/13.50 1/01/95
07 STUDENT CASH 1.20 8/18192 $.35 1/01195
08 YOUTH N/TRANSFER 10 1$3.00 12117/90 10133.50 1101/95
11 PASS RIDERS $18.00 1/01/84 $24.00 1101/95
12 SPECIAL FARE $.05 12/20/96 $.25 12/08/97
15 REDUCED FARE PASS $7.00 10101182 $15.00 1/011?5
16 ADULT W/TRANSFER 4112.40 12/17/90 4/$3.00 1/01/95
20 CASH TRANSFERS $.05 10/01/74 $.t0 5/04181
21 FREE TRANSFERS FREE 10/16/75 FREE 1/01195
22 FREE PASSENGERS 2127179
2 STS
05 STS-CASH $1.00 7/11183 11.50 1/01/95
06 STS-TICKETS 10310.00 7/11/B3 10315.00 1/01195
12 STS PASS $30.00 7111/83 $40.00 I/Di/75
13 STS - SPECIAL FARE $.05 11/23/84 $.25. 5/18195
r
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
City of Beaumont, Texas
City Attomey's Office
Date: September 13, 1999 Die-
To:' Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
lc
From: Lane Nichols, City Attorney
Subject: Acceptance of Gifts from a Public Utility 11
COMMENTS
You recently asked whether you were prohibited from accepting the offer from Entergy of the use
of tickets to a Houston Astros game. Article XVI I, Section 8, of the Charter(copy attached)makes
it unlawful for an officer or employee of the City of Beaumont to accept, directly or indirectly, any
gift, favor, privilege or employment from any public utility that has a franchise from the City.
Obviously, the use of tickets which have a value would qualify as gifts and Entergy is a public
utility enjoying a franchise from the City. Therefore, your use of the tickets would violate the
Charter. Additionally,the Charter provides that any officer or employee who violates this provision
of the Charter is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine that may be prescribed
by ordinance. Also, the Charter requires that that person be "forthwith" removed from office.
This rather harsh paragraph applies not only to employees,but "officers" (the City Council). The
only limitation of this Charter provision is that it applies only to "public utilities." Currently the
Public Utility Regulatory Act defines public utilities in such a way that it would include Entergy,
Entex and Southwestern Bell; however, it would not include Time Warner Communications,
commercial sanitation carriers, and other such entities which might have been franchised by the
City to use public rights of way.
If you have any questions about this opinion, please feel free to call.
^.
Lane Nichols
LN:rw
attachment
r
Art. XVU General Provisions 4t
funds it may have on hand due any person, nor shall the City or any of its
officers of agents be required to answer to any writ of garnishment on any
account whatsoever, nor shall said City be liable to the assignee of any
wages or any officer, agent or employee of said City, whether earned or
unearned, upon any claim or account whatsoever, and as to the city such
assignment shall be absolutely void.
Section 7—CITIZENS GIVEN PREFERENCE IN EMPLOYMENT: Except
as herein otherwise provided, qualifications being equal, citizens of
Beaumont shall be given preference in employment by the City as well as by
any contractor doing work for the City under contract, and such con-
tractors shall pay the prevailing rate of wages paid for the class of work
done; and qualifications, prices and quality of material being equal.
citizens of Beaumont shall be given preference in the awarding of all j
contracts over which the City has jurisdiction, provided that this section
shall not interfere with the system of purchasing supplies for the various j
departments by competitive bidding.
i
Section 8—NO OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE TO ACCEPT GIFTS: No officer
or employee of the City of Beaumont shall ever accept, directly or in- r
directly, any gift, favor, privilege or employment from any public utility
corporation enjoying the grant of any franchise,privilege or easement from
said City during the term of office of such officer, or during such em-
ployment of such employee except as may be authorized by law or or-
dinance: provided, however, that policemen or firemen in uniform or
wearing their official badges may accept such free service where the same
is permitted by ordinance. Any officer or employee of the City who shall
violate the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and
may be punished by any fine that may be prescribed by ordinance for this
offense, and shall forthwith be removed from office.
Section 9—OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES NOT TO HAVE FINANCIAL
INTEREST IN ANY CONTRACT OF THE CITY:No officer or employee of the
City shall have a financial interest direct or indirect or by reason of
ownership of stock in any corporation, in any contract with the City, or be
financially interested directly or indirectly in the sale to the City of any
land. materials, supplies, or services except on behalf of the City as an
officer or employee; provided, however, that the provisions of this Section
shall only be applicable when the stock owned by the officer or employee
exceeds one percent (1%) of the total capital stock of the corporation. Any
willful violation of this section shall constitute malfeasance in office and
any officer or employee guilty thereof shall thereby forfeit the office or
position. Any violation of this section with the knowledge expressed or
implied of the person or corporation contracting with the governing body of
the City shall render the contract voidable by the City Council.
Section 10—RELATIVES OF OFFICERS SHALL NOT BE APPOINTED
OR EMPLOYED: No person related within the second degree of affinity, or
r
f
Art. XVII General Provisions 41
funds it may have on hand due any person, nor shall the City or any of its
officers of agents be required to answer to any writ of garnishment on any
account whatsoever, nor shall said City be liable to the assignee of any
a goal wages or any officer, agent or employee of said City, whether earned or
A the unearned,upon any claim or account whatsoever, and as to the city such
ouncil assignment shall be absolutely void.
,s and
siness Section 7—CITIZENS GIVEN PREFERENCE IN EMPLOYMENT: Except
es herein otherwise provided, qualifications being equal, citizens of
Beaumont shall be given preference in employment by the City as well as by
URES: any contractor doing work for the City under contract, and such con-
ed, or tractors shall pay the prevailing rate of wages paid for the class of work
ure or done; and qualifications, prices and quality of material being equal.
ner or citizens of Beaumont shall be given preference in the awarding of all
�mises contracts over which the City has jurisdiction, provided that this section
or to shall not interfere with the system of purchasing supplies for the various
hereof departments by competitive bidding.
failing
ve the Section 8—NO OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE TO ACCEPT GIFTS: No officer
of the or employee of the City of Beaumont shall ever accept, directly or in-
A con- directly, any gift, favor, privilege or employment from any public utility
d the corporation enjoying the grant of any franchise,privilege or easement from
rter or said City during the term of office of such officer, or during such em-
:iction. ployment of such employee except as may be authorized by law or or-
dinance; provided, however, that policemen or firemen in uniform or
FROM wearing their official badges may accept such free service where the same
ool, or is permitted by ordinance. Any officer or employee of the City who shall
special violate the provisions of this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and
2ments may be punished by any fine that may be prescribed by ordinance for this
offense, and shall forthwith be removed from office.
d shall Section 9—OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES NOT TO HAVE FINANCIAL
except INTEREST IN ANY CONTRACT OF THE CITY:No officer or employee of the
City shall have a financial interest direct or indirect or by reason of
not be ownership of stock in any corporation,in any contract with the City, or be
mont is financially interested directly or indirectly in the sale to the City of any
half of land, materials, supplies, or services except on behalf of the City as an
,all be officer or employee;provided,however, that the provisions of this Section
ity had shall only be applicable when the stock owned by the officer or employee
it duly exceeds one percent (101o) of the total capital stock of the corporation. Any
willful violation of this section shall constitute malfeasance in office and
any officer or employee guilty thereof shall thereby forfeit the office or
T: The position. Any violation of this section with the knowledge expressed or
e to be implied of the person or corporation contracting with the governing body of
call the the City shall render the contract voidable by the City Council.
or car- Section 10—RELATIVES OF OFFICERS SHALL NOT BE APPOINTED
owe or OR EMPLOYED: No person related within the second degree of affinity, or
O CITY OF BEAUMONT
•••••• PUBLIC WORKS
MT INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 15, 1999
TO: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Transit Monthly Report
COMMENTS
Attached is a copy of the Beaumont Transit System balance sheet for the month of
August, 1999. Please attach this copy to the Monthly Report submitted by Public
Works.
Tom Warner
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST. 14°Q
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MOUTH INCREASE
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR DECREASE-CR
--------- --------- -----------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS -
CASH AND CASH ITEMS 1,877 1,843 34
RECEIVABLES-TRADE 2,060 1,160 90�
-PUFLIC FUNDING 245,6B4 168;416 77,258
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
FUEL AND OIL 2,502 2,790 28BCR
PARTS 36097 355287 310
WORK. IN PROCESS 0 0 (;
OTHER ASSETS 6,959 7,224 36CR
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 295,179 216.720 78,459
GRANT ASSETS
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 0 0 0
BUSES
OTHER PROPERTY 0 0 0
TOTAL GRANT ASSETS 0 0 0
CONSUMED IN OPERATIONS 0 0 . 0
NET VALUE GRANT ASSETS 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS 295.179 216.720 78,451
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS FAYABLE-TRADE 40,768 22,982 17,786
-CITY 0 0 A
ACCRUED PAYROLL LIABILITIES 145,393 136,536 8,457
ACCRUED TAX LIABILITIES 47 9. 46CR
OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES 40.865 7,298 33,567
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 227,073 1669911 60062
RESERVE FOR INJURIES & DAMAGES 50,717 32,50(! 18.297
CAPITALIZATION
WORKING CAPITAL-CITY 0 0 t!
GRANT CAPITAL-FEDERAL 0 0 0
-STATE 0 0 0
-LOCAL 0 0 0
-OTHER 17.309 17,309 0
TOTAL GRANT CAPITAL 17009 17,309 0
LESS GRANT CAPITAL CONSUMED 0 0 0
NET GRANT CAPITAL 175309 17,309 0
UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION 17,309 17,309 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL 295079 216.720 78.459
------------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TkANSIT-SYSTEM
---------------------OPERATIONS-STATEMEt_1T FOR MONTH OF AUGUST 31, 1999
CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE
OVER/UND-CR OVERlUND-CR
AMOUNT BUDGET BUDGET % AMOUNT BUDGET BUDGET %
-------- ----------- ------------------
-------- ----------- ------------------
REVENUES
44,276 43,350 926 2.1 PASSENGER 457,194 458,450 1,256CR 0.3CR
160 1,667 1,507CR 90.4CR CHARTER 14,739 18,333 3,595CR 19.6CR
0 0 0 0.0 ADVERTISING 2,000 0 2,1)00 100.0
0 0 0 0.0 OTHER 0 0 0 0.0
191,888 208,828 16,940CR 9.1CR PUBLIC FUNDING 1,966,594 2.247.168 278.564CR 12.4CR
2361124 253,845 17,521CR 6.9CR TOTAL GROSS REVENUES 2,442.516 2;723,951 281,435E"R 10.3CR
EXPENSES
LABOR
75,324 61.729 6.405CR 7.BCR DRIVERS 780,798 864,325 83,327;:8 9.6CR
8,663 91997 1;334CR 13.3CR REPAIRS 100.166 105,727 5,559CR 5.3CR
91373 9,571 19BCR 2.1CR SERVICING 101,861 101.217 664 0.7
7,886 81021 135CR 1.7CR SUPERVISION 86,627- 87 866 237CR 1.4CR
6,520 6,630 110CR 1.7CR OTHER LABOR 71,617 72 622 }805CR I.1CR
107,765 115,948 8,182CR 7.1CR TOTAL LABOR 1,141.493 1.,231,757 90.264CR 7."CR
FRINGE BENEFITS
8,753 9.752 9991R 10,25 PAYROLL TAXES 9R,606 103,130 4,322CR 4.2CR
18,780 21,177 2.397CR 11.3CR GROUP INSURANCE 195.056 232,941 37,67ICR 16.3CR
9,114 9,516 404CR 4.2CP, WORKER'S COMPENSATION 82;649 100 655 17 456Ck 17.BCR
8,831 9,402 571CR 6.1CR FENSION 9;x,223 99;430 1.207CR 1.2CR
9,498 8,647 651 9.8 FRINGE PAY 109,652 115,444 5,792CR 5.00R
52.264 2.350 L96CR 4.1CR OTHER 21,796 21+,963 3,165CR 12.7CR
7,240 6O.E56 3.._16CR 5.9CR TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 606;236 676,567 70,333CR 10,4CR
MATERIALS E SUPPLIES CONSUMED
14.232 12,459 1,773 14.2 FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 115,347 131,761 16,414CR 12.5CR
3,055 4.953 996CR • 24.6CR TIRES AND TUBES 35.641 42,860 7.219CR 16,6CR
14,396 16,356 1.960CR 12,OCR REPAIR PARTS 143 4* 172,977 27,4i,7CR 17.00R
'
.962 4,640 1,678CR 36.2CR MAINTENANCE AND SER'ICING 41,06 49.076 8 0OOCR 16.3CR
!,499 3,549 2,049CR 57,6CR OTHER SUPPLIES 3369 31;521 4,132CR 11.0CR
361144 41:1.,6 4,712CR 12.00R TOTAL MATERIALS & SUP CONSUMED 369,023 434,195 65,172CR 15,OCF,
17,974 17.403 571 3.3 PURCHASED SERVICES 193.459 104,045 596ER 0 1 3Ca:
1,814 2.115 901CR 33.2CR UTILITIES 22,009 28.717 6 r
5,395 9:866 4 471CR 45.3CR INSURANCE c:;216CR 43.4CR
.9,119 104,334 4,,216CR 43.3CR
4.219 3,9!6 253 6.4 TAXES AND LICENSES 40.7;!7 41;942 1.235CF' 2.9CR
5,773 2,0:5 3,733 183.7 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 2fx,47i 22 392 1 921CR B.bCR
O ? 0.0 LEASES AND RENTALS ii ' ii ' tl 0,Q
0.0 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATIOP!
s 0.0 GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED ii t; q,0
236,32,, 2.3.8;5 17.526CR 6,9CR .TOTAL-EXPENSES 3.442,516 2.1 1"3.751 281 ,435CR 10.3CR
IDE O 1CR 100.00R OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE 0 ,? O O,0
0 0 0 U.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0.0
Ba-AUHONT TRANSIT SYSTEM SELECTIVE ANALYSIS FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH F15CAL YEAR-TO-DATE 71 b1ELVE M9 PITHS
OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR 9. OVER UND-CR %
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC
--------------- ------- ---------------------- ------- ----------------------- -------
REVENUES
FASSENGER 44,276 8,624 24,2 457.194 39,868 9.6 498,277 43.129 9.5
CHARTER 160 720CR B1.BCR 14;738 4,312CR 22.6CR 15,268 7,492CR 32,9CR
ADVERTISING (! U 0.0 2,0Q 2.000 i00,0 2,000 2't100 Q,ii
OTHER 0 0 0.0 0 0 01 ii 0 1) (J,0
PUBLIC 236,334 55,664 30.8 2,442,516 229:238 10.48 2,631,974 16`.610 6.7
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIVERS 75,324 18,699 33.0 780,993 140.168 21 .9 835,672 142.255 20.5
REPAIRS 8,663 383 4.6 100 168 12;725 14.6 107:436 12,557 13.2
SERVICING 91373 1,062 12.8 101,881 11,448 12.7 110,390 12;321 12.6
SUPERVISION 7,896 230 3.0 86,629 2;576 3.1 94.295 2'B52 3.1
OTHER LABOR 5;320 198 3.1 71,817 2,420 3.5 ;x138 2;85? 3.8
TOTAL LABOR 107;766 20,572 23.6 1,141,493 169;337 17.4 1,2251911 172,844 15.4
FRINGE BENPFITS
TAX
P4YROLL ES 2,753 1,752 25.0 99,81,18 13,342 15,6 105,548 13.931) 15.1
GROUP INSURANCE 19,760 2,059 12.3 195;056 28,523 17.1 212,23", 31,436 17.4
WORKER'S COMPENSATION 9;114 1,841 25.3 B2,699 4,454CR 5,1CR 89,730 3,937CR 4,2CR
PENSION 8,831 1,746 24.6 98,223 12,100 14,0 105 136 12,614 13.6
FRINGE PAY 9,498 1,303 i5.9 109.652 3,498CR 3.1CR 106;084 10:715ER 9.2CR
OTHER 2,264 1,095 93.7 21:798 105 0.5 23,467 968 4.a
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 57,24;1 9,196 20.6 606;236 4,4.119 8.2 642,202 44.196 7.4
MATERIALS 6 SUPPLIES CONSUMED
FUEL AND LUBRiCANTS 14,232 6,155 76.2 115,347 5,743 5.2 124,743 3,618 3.0
TIRES AND TUBES 3;055. 484 18.8 35,641 562ER 1.6CR 38;662 �704CP 2.00ti
REPAIR PARTS 14,396 8.516 144,8 143,570 8,127[P. 5.4CR 153,723 17,264CR 10.ICR
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING 21962 1;188CR 2B.6CR 41,076 2,613CR 6.00R 43.310 4,930CR 10.2CR
OTHER SUPPLIES 1,499 1.192 328.3 33,391 4,858 17,0 39,964 7.181 21.9
TOTAL MATERIALS 9 SUP CONSUMED 36;144 15,159 72.2 369,025 721CR 0.2CR 400.402 12;179CR 3.00R
PURCHASCO SERVICES i7,974 4,074 2913 183,459 12,542 '1,,3 197.625 12,107 6.5
UTILITIES 1,814 476 35.6 2c 1109 3.609CR 14.1CR 23.264 4 625CR 16.6CR
INSURANCE 5,3?5 .1,675 45.0 59,113 247CR 0.4CR 97,379 4B,927CR 33.4CR
TAXES AND LICENSES 44219 892 26.8 40,707 5,480 15.6 43,972 5;371 14.0
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 5,773 3,022 109.9 20.471 338 1.7 21,291 3,164CR 13,0CR
LEASES WID RENTALS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0,0 0 (> 0.(1
DEFRECIATION AND ANORT17ATIDN 0 U 0.0 (i p i• p i� 0 0 0
GRAIJT ASSETS CONSUMED 0 0 (1 i; (, :1 1; 1;
TOTAL EXPENSES 236,325 .5,666 -30.6 2,442,c518 229,238 10.4 2,651,945 165,606 E,7
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE 1DR 2CR 200.00 2DR 0 010 29 4 16.0
TOTAL 0 0 0.0 0 9 0.0
--------- - - BEAUMONT-TRANSIT SYSTEM SELECTIVE ANALYSIS FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE TWELVE MONTHS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR %
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC 14I5 YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC
------- ---------------------- ------- ----------------------- -------
STS OPERATION
REVENUES
PASSENGER 2,253 349CR 13.4CR 25 567 5,244CR 17.00R 2B 771 5,028CR 14.9CR
TOTAL REVENUES 2,253 349CR 13.4CR 25;567 5,244CR 17.0CR 28;771
5,028CR 14.9X°
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIV:RS 16,034 1,909 13.5 161,852 5,724 3.3 17 .853 5,953 3.5
REPAIRS 0 0 0.0 0 50CR 100.00R 0 50CR 100.OCR
SERVICING 1,585 473 42.5 16,744 3,358 E5.1 .18,181 3,548 24,2
SUFERVISION 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0
O 0 ,0
OT LABOR 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
TOTAL LABOR 17,619 2,382 15.6 178.596 8,432 5.0 194034 9,451 5.1
FRINGE BENEFITS
PAYROLL TAXES 1,416 37 2.7 15,8E+3 698CR 4.2CR. 17.210 574CR 3.2CR
GROUP INSURANCE 31,039 255CR 7.7CR 31;224 96BCR 3.00R 34.604 346CR I,OCR
WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1,47=1 42 2.9 131567 3.282CR 19.5CR 14.983 3.161CR 17.4CR
PENSION 1,429 '3 2.4 15,706 872CR 5.3CR 17,096 752CR 4.21-R FRINGE FAY 1,5?6 79CR 4.9CR 17,489 4.298CR 1?.7CR
16,767 5,7438. 25.5CRi
OTHER 367 136 58.9 3,479 726CR 17.3X8 3,814 551X8 12,6X5
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFIT: 9,262 86CR 0.9CR 97,318 10,834CR If,.OER 104.559 11,1c7CR 9.6CR
MATERIALS I SUPPLIES CONSUMED
FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 11290 287 28.6 11,243 2,401CR 17.6CR 12,321 3.060CR 20,0CR
TIRES AND TUBES 1;081 1,081 100.0 4.669 2 112CR 31.ICR 5;071 2,190CR 30.2CR
REPAIR PARTS 41602 3,890 546.3 28 696 10:700 59.5 31;250 12,2:3 64.1
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING 0 0 0.0 s 0 0 0,0 0 0 11,0
OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0.0 210 210 100.0 210 210 0.0
TOTAL MATERIALS 5 SUP CONSUMED 6,973 51258 306.6 44.818 6,397 16.b 48,852 7,151 17.1
PURCHASED
UTILITIES SERVICES 0 0 010 51408 3,930 265.9 5,583 4,145 273.1
INSURANCE 0 U U.0 U 0 O.0 0 0 0.0
TAXES AND LICENSES 444 2,B87CR Bb.BCR 4 274 0 53.(s 0 4] 0,0
M[SCELLANEQU3 EXPENSES i) ► �,2bBCR ,�.2CR 4,699 5.277CR 52.9CR
LEASES AND RENTALS 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 0 Q 0.0 0 0.0 p,(,
GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED 0 0'0 � �] 0.0
TOTAL EXPENSES n, U 0,0 0 0 (!,0 0 0 0.0
oa,294 4.667 15.8 330,414 2,657 0.8 357,806 4,34:3 1.2
PUBLIC FUNDING REQUIRED 32,041DR 5,016CR I6.6CR 304,847DR 7,901CR 2.7CR 329,035DR 9,371CR 2.9CR
TOTAL 0 0 0.0 0 0
--- - BEAUMONT TRANSIT 5'15TEM SELECTIVE AN LYSiS FOR PUG!IST 51, J55i;
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CU P, RENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE TWELVE M0NTH5
- - - - - - - - - - - - % - - - - - -
OVER UND-CR % OVER UND-CR
OVER UND-CR
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC THIS YEAR LAST YEAR 114C THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INC
------- ---------------------- ------- ----------------------- -------
LINEHAUL OPERATION
------------------
REVENUES
PASSENGER 42.023 8.973 2-?.1 431,627 45,112 11.7 469,506 4B.156 11.4
CHARTER 160 720ER 81.BCR 14;738 4,312ER 22,6CR 15;269 7,482CR 32.90±
ADVERTISING 0 0 0.0 2,000 2,000 100.0 2,0;00 2;00(1 010
OTHER 0 U 0.0 U 0 010 0 0 0.0
TOTAL REVENUES 42,183 8,253 24.3 448,3b5 42,800 10,6 ;2h,774 42,674 9.6
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIVERS 59,290 15,790 39.5 619,146 135,044 27.9 659.819 136,302 26.0
REPAIRS 8,663 383 4.6 100,168 12,775 14.6 107:436 12,607 13.3
SERVICING 7,785 589 8.2 85.137 81090 l0.=
SUPERVISION 7,866 230 0 92:177 8,173 10.5
OTHER LABOR 3.0 86:62. 2,576 3.1 94,285 2,852 3.1
TOTAL LABOR
90,147 18,19( 25.3 962,097 160;905 20.t 1,031;877 163,393 1818
FRINGE BENEFITS
PAYROLL TAXES 7,337 1,715 30.5 B2 955 14 0� 2 ,
FROUF INSURANCE 15}741 2,314 17.2 163 832 29,491 22.0 177:553 al;78? 21.H
WURKE 'S COMPENSATION 7,f3? 1;799 30.8 69,132 1.172CR 1,7CR 74;147 776CR I.00R
FENSION 7,402 1;713 30.1 82;517 12;972 18.7 88.03? 13,366 17,9
CRINGE FAY 7,962 1;382 21.7 92,163 800 0.9 89;315 4,972CR 5,3CR
HER 1,8'77 959 102.2 1B,3i9 031 4.8 19 653 1,519 8.4
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 47,978 9,682 25.9 508,910 56,952 12.6 537,644 :5;323 11.5
MATERIALS l: SUPPLIES CONSUMED
FUEL b LUBRICANTS 12.942 5,868 83,0 104,104 8,144 8.5 112,422 6.698 6.3
TIRE AND TUBES 11974 597CR 23.2CR 30;972 1,530 5.2 33,591 1.4+?6 4,4
REPAIR PARTS ?,794 4 626 89.5 114.874 18,82iCR 14,1;P, 122;473 29;475CR 19.4CR
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING 2;962 I,'IS8CR 2B.61R 41;076 2.613CR 6.00R 43,310 4,920ER 10.2CR
OTHER SI!FFIIES 1,499 1,192 338.3 33,181 4;648 16,3 39,754 6.971 21.3
TOTAL MATERIALS b SUP CONSUMED 29;171 9,901 51.4 324,207 7;IIBCR 2.1CR 351,550 19:330Ck 512CR
PURCHASED SERVICES 17,974 4,074 27.3 178,051 B,b12 5.1 191,962 7,962
UTILITIES 1,814 4.3
476 35,6 22,00? 3;50?CR 14.1CR 23 264
INSURANCE `,395 1,675 4`.0 59,118 247ER 0.4CR 91,373 48 4,625GR 1 .6CR
927CR 33.4CR
TAXES AND LICENSES 3.779 3,779 10,0,0 36;433 10,748 41.9 27,173 10 651 37.2
n
MISCELLANEOUS E�PEN;ES 5,7^3 3;022 IU9.9 20',471 339 1,7 21.291 3,184CR 13.0CR
LEASES AND RENTALS ii 0 010 0 0 011) 0 tf 0.0
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 0 0 0.0 U 0 0 0 0
GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED ;) ri 0.1) U U ii,(i ;? 0 0.0
TOTAL EXPENSES 202,031 501999 33.8 2,112,104 226,551 12.i) 2,2?4,139 161,263 7,6
PUBLIC FUNDING REQUIRED 159,04BDR 42,746CR 36,5CR 1,663,739DR 183,781CR 12.4CR 1,807,365DR 1181599CR 7,OCR
TOTAL 0 0 0.0 4 0 0,0 0 0 010
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM
REVENUE AND COST PER MILE REPORT FOR AUGUST 31, 1959
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - CURRENT MOUTH - - - - - - TWELVE M011THS - - -
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR.
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
COST COST COST COcT COST COST
AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER AflOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER
MILE NILE MILE MILE MILE MILE
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
REVENUES
PASSENGER REVENUE 42,023 .5680 33,050 .5300 .0380- 469,506 .5560 421,350 .5597 .0037
SPECIAL TRANSIT FARES 2,253 .0305 2,602 .0417 .0112 20,771 .0341 33 799 .0449 .0108
CHARTER REVENUE 160 .0022 SBO .0141 .0119 15.268 .0181 22,750 .0302 .0121
ADVERTISING REVENUE U .0000 0 .0000 .0000 2,000 .0(124 0 ,0000 ,0024-
OTHER REVENUE 0 ,0000 0 .0000 .0001 (1 ,0000 0 .0000 .0000
PUBLIC FUNDING 191,898 2.5937 144,128 2.3112 .2925- 2,136.429 2.529" 2,000.465 2.6680 .1381
TOTAL GROSS REVENUES 236,324 3.1943 180,660 2.B?70 .2973- 2,651;974 3.1405 2.406.364 3.3029 ,1624
EXPENSES
LABOR
DRIVERS WAGES 753024 1.0181 56.625 .9080 .1101 835,672 .9696 693.417 .9211 .0685
LABOR FOR REPAIRS 8,663 .1171 8;280 .1328 .0157- 107;366 .1271 94,519 1260 .0011
ACCIDENT AND VANDALI511 0 10000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .09611 0 .0000 10000
SERVICING LABOR 9073 .1267 8,311 .1333 .0066- 110,380 ,!307 98,059 .1303 .0004
BUILDINGS GROUNDS s EQUIPMENT 0 .0000 U .0000 ,000.) 70 .0001 0 16000 10001
MAINTEMANCE SUPERVISION 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 0 .0001? .0000
TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISION 7,886 .1066 7,656 .122B ,0162- 94,235 .1117 ?1,433 .1215 .0098-
ADMINISTRATIVE 6,520 .0861 6;322 .1014 .0133- 78;132 .0925 75,279 .I!EUO ,n07L-
TOTAL LABOR 107;766 1.4566 B7,194 1.3982 .0564 1,225,911 1.451; 1,053,067 1.398? .0528
FRINGE BENEFITS
---------------
SOCIAL SECURITY 8.715 .1178 6,955 .1115 .0063 141,217 .1199 68,013 .1169 .0030
FENSION 8;831 .1194 7,OB5 .1136 .0058 105;136 .1245 92522 .1229 .0016
GROUP INSURANCE 18,780 226 16,121 .2691 .11143- 212,237 .2513 181)"801 .2402 .0111
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 38 .0005 46 .0007 .0002- 4,331 .00`1 376A ,0049 .00102
WORKERS COMFENSATION 9,114 .1232 7,273 .1166 .6vS6 °9,730 .1063 5.3;667 .1244 .0181-
SIC1: PAY 3;000 .0405 3,000 .04E1 ,0076- 20.765 ,0246 28.250 .0375
H13LIDArSPAY 264 .0036 171 .01127 .0009 23;646 10230 24,076 .0321' '?040-
VACATION PAY �,1�11 .0696 4,675 0750 .0054- 47,080 .0"0 56.099 .0745 .0187-
OTHER PAID ABSENCE 11034 .0147 349 .0056 .009! 14.591 .0173 ,3.314 .Ctil .0 052
OTHER FRINGE BENEFITS 2}264 .0306 11169 .0187 .0119 23,417 .0278 22,4°9 .0295 .0021-
TOTAL FRINGE FENEFITS 51,240 .7737 47,444 .7610 .(-129 64=,202 7605 598,0016 .7544 .033?-
1
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM
REVENUE AID LOST PER MILE REPORT FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - CURRENT MONTH - - - - 7 W E L V E 00 NTu5 - - -
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR.
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
COST COST 1051 COS? COST COST
AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER
MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
MATERIALS L SUPPLIES CONSUMED
-----------------------------
FUEL AND LUBRICANTS 14,232 .1924 8,077 .129 .0629 124,743 .1477 121,125 .1609 .0132-
TIRES AND TUBES 3,055 .0413 2.571 .0412 ,0001 38,662 .0458 39,446 .0524 .0066-
REPAIR PARTS 14;396 .1946 5;552 .0890 .1056 iy0,087 .1777 168:320 .2236 .0459-
REFAIR PARTS ACCIDENT L VANDAL 0 0000 328 .0053 .0053- 3.535 .0043 2,667 ,0035 0009
SERVICING SUPPLIES 1,439 .0195 2,045 .0328 .0133- 19,926 .02:6 21,595 .0287 .0051-
]TrtER MAINTENANCE 1.523 .0206 2 105 .0338 .0132- 23;334 .;!277 26.645 .0354 .007-
OTHER TRANSPORTATION 0 .0000 0 10000 .0000 0 00full O 10000 .00,10
OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,512 .0204 310 .0050 .0154 21,750 .0258 18.77:
MARKETING SCHEDULES ETC 13- .W12- 3- .0000 .0002- 14.5510 .W IF 13,0`.i .0173 Y041-
OTHER SUPPLIES 0 .0000 0 ,0000 ,0000 3,654 0 43 9 6 � ?-
TOTAL MATERIALS t SUP CONSUMED 36.144 .4885 2(1,995 F 5^' 59 .5481 ,Q7 p
.33b. .1�w 400,402 .4742 412,581 .5481 .0?39-
PURCHASED SERVICES
------------------
MANAGEMENT FEE ?.783 .1x179 7,742 .1241 .0162- 95,555 .1122 72,W 1231 .007?-
ADMINISTRATIVE BILLING . 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 0 .00!00 ,0000
CLAIMS ADJUSTERS I ATTORNEYS 5,329 .0.720 2,327 .0373 .0347 35,!58 .0422 35,122 .0467 .0045-
OTHER 4.662 ,0630 M31 .0614 .00'16 66,402 07Bb 57,734 .0767 .0019
TOTAL PURCHASED SERVICES 17;974 .2429 13,900 .2229 .0200 197,625 .2:40 1851516 ,2464 .0124-
UTILITIES 1.814 .0245 1.330 .0215 .0030 23,264 .027; 27,889 .0370 .0095-
INSURANCE
PREMIUMS FOR PL t PD 3,361 .0454 3,680 .0590 .0136- 40,177 .0476 44,156 .0587 .0111-
PROVISION FOR FL t PD 2:219 .0300 1,871 .0300 .00�i0 58,501 ,0693 102,834 .1379 .0686-
1;185- .0025- 1,831- .0294- .0269 1,300- .0015- t b85- .0022- ,n,}(,7
TOTAL INSURANCE 5,395 .0729 3,720 ,0597 ,0132 97,378 .1153 146;305 .1944 .0791-
TAXES
FUEL AND LUBRICANT TAXES 4,219 .0570 3,327 .0534 ,0036 43472 .0520 :8,478 .0511 .0009
OTHER TAXES AND LICENSES 0 .0000 0 ,0000 .0000 0 .0(!00 0 0000 ,0000
TOTAL TAXES 4,219 ,0570 3,327 .0534 .0036 43.872 .0320 38.478 .0511 .0009
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM
REVENUE AND COST PER MILE REPORT FOR AUGUST 31, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT MONTH - - - - - TWELVE I10NTHS - - -
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCR. THIS YEAR LAST YEAR INCP,,
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
COST COST COST COST COST COST
AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PER AMOUNT PER AMOUNT PER PEI
MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE MILE
--------------------------------------- ------ -------------------------------------- ------
r.ISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
----------------------
DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 .0000 677 .0109 .0109- 2,351 .0029 21903 .0040 .0012-
TRAVEL AND MEETINGS 374 .0051 0 .0000 .0051 1,261 .0015 4:610 .0061 .0046-
BRIDGE TOILS 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 4 .O0r-0 0 .0604 .0000
ADVERTISING 5.286 .0714 2,029 .0325 .0389 15,092 .0179 14,925 ,0198 .0019-
OTHER EXFENSE 113 .0015 46 .0007 .0008 2,547 .0031 1,957 .00?6 .0005
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 5,773 .0780 2,751 .0441 .0339 21.291 .0252 24.475 .0325 .0073-
LEASES AND RENTALS 0 .0010to 0 10000 .0000 0 ,0400 0 .0000 .0000
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 0 .0001) 10000
GRANT ASSETS CONSUMED 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000 0 .0000 0 .0000 .0000
TOTAL EXPENSES 236,325 3.1943 180,659 2.8970 .2973 2,651.945 3.1404 2,486,339 3.3029 .1625-
.
• r
BEAUMONT TRA"1SIT SYSTEM GPERATINB STATISTICS FOR AUGUST. 1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=-----
CURRENT MONTH FI5CAL YEAR TO DATE TWELVE MONTHS
-------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 CITY
01 ADULT CASH 32,740 29,488 347,637 310.039 376.388 239,278
02 ADULT TICKETS 0 0 557 2B4 557 284
03 SENIOR CITIZEN CASH 7,177 6,209 79,153 72,225 85,220 79,188
04 ELDERLY & HANDICAPPED 0 0 0 325 0 325
07 STUDENT CASH 22,924 17,836 221,728 IB9,531 239,883 206,911
08 YOUTH W/TRANSFER 52 64 3,288 1;701 3,343 1,786
11 PASS RIDERS 10,594 8,455 107,237 95,550 116,706 103,248
12 SPECIAL FARE 0 7 6,412 16,761 6;412 16,761
15 REDUCED FARE PASS 5,72E 4.781 61.661 53.534 67,119 58,68+1
16 ADULT W/TRANSFER 953 650 6,589 6;9555
7,282 7,500
20 CASH TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0
21 FREE TRANSFERS 33,309 26,086 336,273 282,822 362,036 30B4O84
22 FREE PASSENGERS 0 0 20 i 20 ' 0
90 SCHEDULE MILES 57,627 45,091 609,214 477,425 653.266 540,712
91 CHARTER MILES 21 169 41046 4,372 4;111 4,995
92 NON REVENUE MILES 006 11006 7,610 12,330 8,422 13,307
TOTAL REVEIIUE PA=SENGERS 90,063 66,570 834,462 746,705 9021910 813.961
REVENUE PASSENGERS PER MILE 1:389 1.476 1:370 1.502 1.282 1,50J
AVERAGE FARE PER PASSENGER .5248 .4965 .5173 .5175 .5192 .5177
2 STE
05 STS-CASH 752 691 7,273 7,474 8.009 8,113
06 STS-TICKETS 155 103 1,608 1,083 11795 1,211
12 STS PASS 1.103 1,273 11),'790 13,739 121116 15;132
13 STS - SPECIAL FARE 0 0 0 63 0 63
90 SCHEDULE MILES 15,529 16,095 162,426 177,025 170,657 193,750
TOTAL REVENUE PASSENGERS 2,010 2,067 19,751 22059 21,920 24,519
REVENUE PASSENGERS PER MILE 129 120 122 126 .123 127
AVERAGE FARE PER PASSENGER 1.1209 1.2508 1.2030 1.2620 1.2302 1.2727
COMPANY TOTALS
TOTAL TRANSFER PASSENGERS 33,389 26,086 336,293 202,822 362,116 308,884
TOTAL REVENUE PASSENGERS 82,078 68,637 054,213 ?69.264 424.930 030 4PO
TOTAL PASSENGERS 115,467 94,723 1,190,506 1,052,OB6 1,286,946 1.147.364
TOTAL BU5 MILES OPERATED 73,983 62,361 783,364 691,1552 944;456 752,784
BEAUMONT TRANSIT SYSTEM FARE STRUCTURE AUGUST ,1919
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIOR EFFECTIVE CURRENT EFFECTIVE
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
1 CITY
O1 ADULT CASH 4.50 1/01/84 3.75 1/01/95
02 ADULT TICKETS 532.50 11/15/89 543.75 1/01/95
03 SENIOR CITIZEN CASH 3.15 10/16/75 1.35 1101195
04 ELDERLY S HANDICAPPED 10111.50 12/17,90 10133.50 1/01/95
07 STUDENT CASH 1.20 8/18192 1.35 1101195
08 YOUTH WITRANSFER 10113.00 12/17/90 10133.50 1/01/95
11 PASS RIDERS $18.00 1/01/84 $24.00 1/01195
12 SPECIAL FARE 1.05 12/20/96 1.25 12/08/97
15 REDUCED FARE PASS 17.00 10101182 $15.00 1101/?5
16 ADULT W/TRANSFER 4/$2.40 12/17/90 433.00 1/01/95
20 CASH TRANSFERS $.05 10/01/74 $Jo 5/04181
21 FREE TRANSFERS FREE 10116/75 FREE 1/01195
22 FREE PASSENGERS 2127/79
2 STS
05 STS-CASH $1.00 7/11183 11.50 1/01/95
06 STS-TICKETS 10/$10.00 7/11/83 10315.00 1/01195
12 STS PASS 130.00 7111/83 $40.00 1/0i/95
13 STS - SPECIAL FARE 1.05 11/23/84 3.25. 5/19195
BEAUMONT PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 399
1307 WALL
BEAUMONf,TEXAS 77702
Phone 409-838.6500
September 12, 1999
City Council
Beaumont, Texas
In regard to the expansion of the Beaumont EMS system, City Council and management should
b8 informed of all possibilities.
1.) The expense of training Beaumont firefighters to the paramedic level is but a
percentage of the cost of one ambulance. Bill Lambert,Administrative Asst. to Chief Bertrand,
has informed me that approximately thirty Beaumont firefighter/paramedics could be trained
and available within one year. This would give Beaumont Fire Rescue ALS capabilities on fire
apparatus, thereby allowing a paramedic on scene in less than five minutes.
2.)Hiring new personnel as firefighter/paramedics would leave no expense to the city.
If further details are needed please call Capt. Bill Lambert, Beaumont Fire Rescue Headquarters.
Sincerely,
Treasurer Local 399
Beaumont Fire Rescue
riday,September 17 1999 5M PM To:Stephen Bonczek From ,Chas Gicro
C I T Y 0 F
=-=- Was hington Ke 1. 4
B E A U M 0 N T
v r1 City cifl3calil-nont -- W 1,411110o!]
r
Senate Moving on FY 2000 Spending &401F
INSIDE Transportation
Colnmej,tc
Noticing and CD . .......... 2 Senate easily passes DOT sj)eudij),g bill. The
Grtrhotunertr Senate passed the FY -20601 Transpoiiatioii
.. .. .. 2 :Appropriations Bill this week, h• A x%)tc of9s.-o •L I]_, ji'd
beaoiolh"istei 3 The col-Iti-ovelsv surTounding the hill was roso�c. rim k'
eliminated once the-transit equity provision-that i
would have limited each state s transit alit ,il,i- c
apl-.vitionilient to 12,5 percent Nvis(Ii oppccj. I Ile
SellIlte':1 aCtl0l)now I)aWS tile WaV fur CollfeleiiCt
%%1U)the HOUSC,WhICII IMSSed its J)Jil ill ji-juc,
E I e c t re,n C C om i-nc,-.,,c e
Tile, Senate bill provides a SI (i i),111oll increase
over FY IW) funding levels, mostiv dilk to the
ali k'� - 1.) A
increases required by last year's TEA-21 kvvv.
Overall fuidiug levels Cor the highway Plopi,1111
atc$-'s.9billion,up from This yea's S21.3 billior, see:; .I 11�., in :c 'T
I tausit.received a total of$;;.7 9 t)lj iloll. Uf,110111,
$ -3 bdh011. 'this breaks out to $3.1 billiou for s,,.k
:�
llausit loilnula grants_ up lion S^Si 5 billion. �11!d 1,e earl -lij il
S2.4s.billion for transit capital nives"T110,14 c�lt�t 1 1 i- tomef x, i
an increase,of$144 million The, transit capital in
investrncnts would be split m the folIc)m,-;l9 I
tual-nier: $490 million for buses and bus filCilltleS c.f
and$%*million each foi-the Ne-,v Stir T,,,ii asic leph011 m I 1:.L
call Model-nizatioll prowl-allli
Otter Senate 11-dill
g levels uucludc:$375 im1hou
for highway safety programs. LT) fmrn P[
million, $i?l Milh011 for AMM-111 a (lee!-ea:;e of
(:;,T�: 1+
$38 million from FY 201A, but the slinit, as the
President',request. and the Aiq)cil improvement r!,c )f
Washington Relvort Piopsni iATP)was funded at S2 billion- up from on,1'11
,,1.9s billion in FY 1999,
Cal-olvit Chr,mr Til,: Scliale d9leed to file-tutu' TE:',-'-) by and ;A 16 S
9'a,shm",foil-,Ysnv:ant providing $1.6 billion ill liq4iwov hands. lallitl
c hum"y"d,all than the$1.5 billion set Out In 7 FA-`1 N lof e of C0,11) -:1.,oic
tile hig!)Nv,�,v fill)(1,; would also be Chl-lisloym.?i b.6qho
J
llf;l lale,4�,e coil/ the states r3thei than allow them!(-)fiov-t1ir-ough
DOT. Transportation Appi oPrlQ[;ol is
Subcormnittee Chaii-man Richard Shelbv I It 1: d :s
In ep all ?cap;hrtedge offeled the amendment. NNhicIl cas approved
despite the objections of Senate PlihIlu Works ,-aHc
i"01 1,sh ept.Atf -Suite "00 i-ollulliLtee Chau-niall Julia Cljdlre (R-Fl�, 'Fill-;
11"'ISIMigtoll Dc 20005-�101 PIOVIS1011 is expected to UdU1,e Cpi,e �i"bit of
i20-2; S424930 controversy in conference, since the Hou;c 1A] •t,d
Pay !ALI, 512-J0i1 closely adheres to TEA-21 fomc:la allocation:
• Friday,September 17,1999 5:03 PM To:Stephen Bonczek Front.Chris 'a Ji1J
Y
2 September 17, 1999 V'ta:.1 t)gtar r`:r• .l is
Johnson and Richmond, VA City increase of$25 million over F'r' 1 999 kr;cis
ouncihnembei Joseph Brooks- 'i estifvillU There were several set irides pith]!CDIiG nvICt1 ment
,nl bdlatf of the `ouncit of State including$41,-i million for Youthbuild nrnJ
Guvennnc!!ts, the luterlr_tliutial million m individuul
Vtafinecrs Association. talc National demonstration projects in FY 1 999- set- L. '_1•i .. ,.,,��_ _i r,.iii. �ie
Coulercl— of State Legislatuics. the asides totaled $533 mliiholl Sec[io;l 1;)
National Association of Counties the loan guarantees would remain at 51 til 1 1 ,ci ' arl d rr;, a
N'wolial GOvrillors' A,scicintiun, the billion and ale HCL1F Irveslule it If l,ric i
Nationol i,carue. of Citics. and the I_nited Par,nerships program wonkl be fiinric�l at bill hwi uus cleared !0n [t a
Stour Coufeleuce ofA1d4ors. Johnson and the FY 1999 level of$1 6 billion. 11� ).: ic"r !)10,i:le;
Ploors algued that the 9,10I.vth ofsales over' �!i:itics, rt0'.rli .ion:! 'k �;,i
the Llternet could seriously impact state.old The committee recommended$1.02 billion I
local• rccenuc, crealc a `class of elite for-homeless assistance programs, it[, from
merchants" not subject to sales taxes. and $925 million it FY 1999. Howevei. the ?w r,ili irci r tiL , iii:r
create a "digital divide` hct'.vccn taxpavcts committee would also require that 3(j o.n e r.'. iyi1. 1 u: Cult,
With a10CVSS to the It;tentct and those without percent of those finds be allocate toward !e r)I n
Intetlict access Commissicncrs heard the permanent housing as well as a 25 perceut :,.') ii�il�.,i ;;u RltLui_
opposite, fionl a ntmiber of olganizations, match for federal fimicL used for honre:'as vsit� n i•.in.� ^l '„ „rn r;.
most of them reprcSCnting the electronic services. The Section 2i)2 clderiv housing ;11S' - r,:: t ,,, I,::
convme!ce ildustrv, ill addition. prior to the program would ieceiv v 570.1 nullion. a❑ '! c-r i.:�,;.� r.'•,.
meeting, a gRoup ofTfilll '-live members of increase ofS5(i millimi, ^;bile housing ill, .,1 i°',1 flit
ConE ress led by House Majorir, Leader the disabled would reniaii at the Fl" 149%
Richard Arrley sent it letter level of$194 million
-
tvarr!arg the Commission not to consider
i '
allov,'ilg state dud local govenlrnents to The committee also provided no funds for i mill;.r! 1.,r
c:otlect sales ta>'es lion Llternet sales. ille second round of the Emnow'eiln_n'
m;ilj;ri +;;r 1:1 i -.i;,,,,
Zones program and fronded the Brownf!c-lds r r r,
I-`ncicr Leaviti's prol,o aL the ('onirnission redevelopment proea'am at 3 25 milLon, the r,: ti;i i ar :i !I,
r.
tl ill accept plar!s thal sleet set enteric(to be same level as FY 199Q. The public honsi:
t)nsre,l on the C.onlinissious web site] from capital find would he decreased b.)— 5
gioups supported by dice Coinn!ission million. but the$155 Ulhon level was tl.e
members. The Commission n'ili discuss tile same as the President s request 1.In k" a'.)!-', C. i. ;r .-
plans at tllcu neat mcctiti).. to be held in elimination grants for public liousiilg t'rouh I i'i,i< u::-t
S::n)Frincisco on December 1.1-1 5, 1999 A remain at"310 million
transcript of the New York meet-ma will be Federalism
I
also be posed om the Corra*u„ion s web The Senate bill wVould also provide 5'60
rt ltH911L'l'OAllilL'1'CL'L'Ofillll29S1011.01 million for the Commuttity Development
Financial Institutions (CI7Fj) program- the '.11' t__ -
Housing and CD same level as ^1' 1999. The Americo.lz, __
program would teceiv, a slight reduction,
clown$2 million to$423 5 million, e,il
Senate )t,iel :ends ITt_-D st enalla,2 bill to �mate-
floi The Senate Appropriations Senate leaden,hope to bring tine bill to 11:':
C onunittee approved its version of the F;' door heat week One amendment that iJ.
and Independent Agencies expected to stir controversy would allot';
appiepriation3 bill yesterday. 03]e d-IY atter law-abtdmg pill owners w1 wt- tot i l .
it w,is passed on the Subcommittee teyel show up it anew,H11)-sponsoie.d buyback i: ti
The overall bill is i_traer than its 1-Iouse program(pail of the drug efimirlaticngtant;j eaatt'�nt:-
�:ounterpart, as a resul' cf It ntaneuver b,, to get those gums back, Sei!ator Luny "'ra
approntiatiol!s Committee Chailinan Ted 1 (R-ID) xtempted to offer the amendment it: -,' wc'k
Stevens (R-A-K) 'o add ST_^ billion to the. during We ccaiminee n!aikup but
measure. persuader] to wait until the hill rcache' tk-, 71t" ,
(lour. n a:
13L1) propivil- did not suffer larg;
reductions in the bill,with the e::ccption of t_ _ ;,;1" „ 1, ,, n.. "k. :!
a!norak)1ltun o!1 ue"%.Sectiuil o ilciernetiidl
von,:ens The Comm.mity' Development � ii{r: ;,e T _t_
Blocl, Grunt (CDBG) piogiain '.ruuld be
Fonded at Sd-8 billion ill _FY 1-000, an
•
Friday,September 17,1999 5:03 Pfl1 To:Stephen Bonczek From Chris G,.;iiu p�I.D;. :,
r+s�r�cr.�naars�*zs
■ 3 September 17, 1999 y�:3 fr;rzterr �;: i
detenuining performtince standards for state- Department of Housing and Urban 1)c p:.ruacii: of F:ciu.artp; a;uE i,-n
administered federal grant programs Development, Septentbel- 14: The C-face O[•A clopi-tem. Si.f•trul
of the Assistant Secrct'lly for Public and 1" u' <n: i .,;to i t tt
There are repoils that Macliltosil_v.-ho is a hndlan Housing has ploposcd a nnle that :;, f��.1 l it
candidate fbr Gowenlor in ndlana, was would implement a ne,.v formula system to i, 1 < I �ioc_ ,:,_ _ .,d i•.
perAL.Ided to drop)luS eflons at tlnc urging of public housing agercies for thou (-pitch „-i..;.rc' ci_t �li.
the 11.S Chamber of Commerce. which needs. Comments at clue by October 1.1.
stion,l. eliposes the legislation. The 1999, Pages 49923- 49929. Pit.
Chamber feared that the legislation would
lead to an nnoigalltzed and difficult-to- Department of Holising and t'rbau
follo v series of state laws and lawsuits. Development, September 14: The C.ficc i url,or;ui:nth tol �,liieat:,� a ,`
Uacintosln Lad been able to pass the of the Assistant Secretal}- for fubit foal •)t±1;niQ tiro Sclt+^e. :I, �nl.@rte ',
le±.-uslation through his subcomniit.tec but the Indian Housing has ploposed a lul': that
;ranibei s opposition doomed its chances describes the requi-enlelnts and procedinres �•,_,n,u1c tin, a a''fi11
Ol belrng approved 111 tl'ie full comnultce- regulating a neat statuton,flomeovwller'3hili
prop-am to be administered by publi: t. _-
Chn the other hand, local government housing agencies. This;rule would permit a
r�
one:ruizstions have been vei-y suppoilive of PILAto make publichousung dwelling unit s , 1 cr_ ;r:
the bill and hope to work with Senate public housing project:;, and other housing
Ge:enlmznt lffaus ommittce chaunnan projects available for purchase h�, low;-
Fred T•hompsou (R--1 on similar income families as their pi-r)cipai C t, ;i .,_ .l ;,� 1� i:�o:i ,1� r ,:
to nslation residences. Comments are clue N ovemb%r
15, 1999 Pages 49931 -49938
Federal Register s,
Department of the Interior, Septenilwt•
14: the Bureau of hndi�un .Alf u: h, ;rips 1<. ),(r.j, , [; nr.1 f1if a r
f
be folio Cilg item, have 1ppeatcd in tile, a11110ullCcd that it is reopening the eonimeut 0f i c• j)1•lilt[[..i' rl:G.c'S 11 ,1
Fec(cral ftister suiee September 13. 1991) period for the proposed rule on t,e resse:uch and courd;!wti,,n off,
rn
Additional ulforation mad• be obtained ! acquisition of title to land in trust_ ,rant%. II tau arr
from th,s office Comments are now Bile by Octobe'i I-
1999, Page 4()7 56. hsiru )ie+[tic [alit t rrs,
Department of Labor,September 13: The
t,in loymeu[:md J i�utun av - 1
1 f imliustratxnll is Department of Housing and Urball iT mail a inegalt
s; i u.f� grail a lr�hc rnloi�; fur
regional
I � Development, September 14 The
cout-oillunt budding rants These grants of the ,Assistant Secretary for Publi: ;tad — --��----�--
will Support Ilse cremation and devalopmenl Indian flousilg has isued a final iule
of legiorial sl=ills consoltia to assess ameitdih,g HUD regulations to rcTllace
employer skill heeds to assess the heed for Hl.'ll's Public and Iii:ia.n Housin>; Unt;,
cicsiig the calks between skills desied by Elimination Program fronds eolttr;eticce
indnstrl and tine shrill: held };: regionai grant prooxam with a tbrnuh;a alio,atiou
Wotl:cr_:. Ilieho ass are due Novennbei 1 funding system. This rule is effeai••e
999 Pages 49513- !9531. October 14, 1[199. Applications for eligil-,i,
PIL4s are also due Gcu,ber 1-1, 1 999 Po e
Department of Housing and Urban 49899_4y922
Uei elopment, September 14: 'lhe Office
i tl�e :A visuiit Sccretar; for Public and Department of Justice. September 14:
tnd"In Housing has proposed a rule that 1 The Bureau of Justice Assistance is
•,would unplenmit a new statutor✓provision ainendini:, the hederal Law Liiforcemorit
to authorizt, public housing .iueneies u; Dependents Assistarl.e 1'rogr-ann to e•ct,anil
adrniinster thei housing programs through tine scol;e of eligibilih• for fl,1r- nil
a coux,rtlari cf 1'H As. As o, 1'St1s would assistance f6i higher education; to i1,,c
ha*e the option of using subsidiaries.joint dependents of public safety officers. This
:elntures. par'neislnps or ether business rule is eflective Septetnor 14.
uraneamants to manage then' piogralns.
xa�nerns
11,,due by 1,.wvnlber 1 999.
Pa e.;4993()-.'193-1.
EL
Economic Development
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
GOALS
AND
OBJECTIVES
FISCAL Y a 2000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
The Economic Development Department was established within the City Manager's Office as part
of the FY 2000 budget. The Executive Assistant to the City Manager/Economic Development
Director will administer the responsibilities of the new department which will encompass the
Housing Division and the Grants Administration Division(formerly Finance), Convention and
Visitors Bureau and Planning and Zoning(formerly Public Works). The purpose of the new
department is to enhance the quality of life of all citizens through expanding economic
opportunities. The focus will be on the diversification of the tax base, retention/attraction of
businesses and creation of value added jobs.
The Internal Auditor-will also report to the Executive Assistant to the City Manager/Economic
Development Director. Internal Audit is an independent appraisal function established to examine
and evaluate the activities as a service to management.
STRATEGIC ISSUES- FY 2000
• Work with the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce, the Partnership of Southeast Texas, and
the Golden Triangle Minority Business Council to diversify the tax base, grow existing
businesses and create new jobs. Evaluate the return on the City's monetary investment
made to each of the above organizations. FY 2000.
• Develop a proposed strategic economic development plan that identifies actions, projects
and issues to be addressed. A presentation will be made to the City Council for review
and direction. January, 2000.
• Review and recommend changes, if necessary, to the City's Tax Abatement Policy and
economic incentives. Determine the advantages and disadvantages of developing an
Economic Development Corporation or similar entity to expand economic development
activities through acquisition of property, incentives, financing, and site development.
January, 2000.
• Develop viable urban communities through affordable housing and suitable living
environments. For example, develop the former Edwards School site which has been
replatted as the Glenwood Addition. The development will provide twenty lots for future
construction and also includes a 2.5 acre site for a city park. FY 2000.
• Provide the citizens of Beaumont with current and long range planning services through
the development of comprehensive and neighborhood plans and through the enforcement
of zoning and subdivision regulations, with equal consideration given to individual and
public interests when making planning decisions. FY 2000.
• Continue to promote the cultural and recreational amenities in Beaumont and Southeast
Texas to increase the number of people visiting and staying overnight. FY 2000.
• Continue to promote the redevelopment of downtown Beaumont. Commence public
works improvements to complement the Crockett Street Project, Municipal Court,
Jefferson Theatre, Hotel Beaumont, and other businesses located on Crockett, Orleans
1 of 9
and Fannin Street. FY 2000.
PLANNING DIVISION
Planning is responsible for the comprehensive planning activities of the City and for administering
the subdivision regulations. The division provides technical assistance to the Planning
Commission, Historic Landmark Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment through the
processing of zoning change and specific use permit requests, subdivision plat requests, requests
for variances and special exceptions to the regulations of the zoning ordinance and requests for
certificates of appropriateness, historic tax exemptions and historic preservation loans. The
Planning Division is responsible for amendments to the zoning ordinance and subdivision
regulations. In addition, the Planning Division provides technical assistance to the Martin Luther
King, Jr. Parkway Commission and various neighborhood associations.
STRATEGIC ISSUES- FY 2000
CENSUS 2000
The Planning Division, through the Complete Count Committee, is committed to assisting the
U.S. Bureau of the Census in its efforts to count each person living in Beaumont. Having an
accurate count ensures the City of Beaumont its fair share of federal funds, accurate
socioeconomic data on its citizens and appropriate political representation.
ANNEXATION PLAN
The Texas State Legislature has passed legislation that requires each city to develop an
annexation plan by December 31, 1999. This plan must be completed whether a city has any
intention to annex or not.
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS
The Planning Division, through its neighborhood planning process, is committed to neighborhood
revitalization. The neighborhood plan plays an important role in identifying the needs and wants
of the neighborhood and is used as a guide in improving the neighborhood. The Planning Division
has identified the South Park Neighborhood for its next plan.
GOAL
• Ensure that each and every individual in the City of Beaumont is counted in the 2000
Census.
OBJECTIVES
• Provide leadership and technical assistance to the City of Beaumont Complete Count
Committee. September, 2000.
2 of 9
• Coordinate with businesses, churches and other facilities to display and distribute census
materials in places of businesses. April, 2000.
• Coordinate with the media to do stories on the importance of Census 2000. April, 2000.
• Provide census informational materials at community events. April, 2000.
• Coordinate with neighborhood associations to ensure that residents are aware of the
census. April, 2000:
GOAL
! Develop an annexation plan for the City of Beaumont.
OBJECTIVES
• Review state law to ensure compliance of annexation plan. October, 1999.
• Coordinate development of an annexation plan and its adoption by City Council.
December, 1999.
GOAL
• Develop the South Park Neighborhood Plan.
OBJECTIVES
• Create an inventory of existing conditions. November, 1999.
• Conduct a survey of neighborhood residents' wants and concerns. February, 2000.
• Develop neighborhood plan with neighborhood residents' input. May, 2000.
• Have Planning Commission and City Council adopt plan. July, 2000.
• Begin implementation of the plan. September, 2000.
GRANTS ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
The Grants Administration Division is responsible for submitting, administering, monitoring and
reporting the entitlement and competitive grant funds from the Federal Government. The Grants
Division works closely with the Housing Division, Planning Division, Cash Management Division,
Clean Community Department, Police Department and local non-profit organizations to
implement the various programs that are allocated grant monies.
STRATEGIC ISSUES- FY 2000
3 of 9
As Congress debates the merits of decreasing or increasing the President's Discretionary Budget,
the Grants Division will work closely with the Planning and Housing Divisions to develop a new
Five Year Consolidated Plan, mandated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD).
Because citizen participation is an important aspect of the Consolidated Plan submission process,
the Grants Division will develop a new and aggressive strategy that will encourage citizen input.
GOAL
• Improve the Annual CDBG Expenditure Rate.
OBJECTIVES
• Develop a new monitoring strategy for public service agencies and City Divisions that
receive CDBG funds. February, 2000.
• Increase the efficiency of drawing funds from the U.S. Treasury. January, 2000.
• In the Grant Agreement, revisit the time subrecipients are allowed to expend the grant
funds. January, 2000.
GOAL
• Maintain knowledge of all applicable federal regulations pertaining to various grant
programs.
OBJECTIVES
• Attend mandatory and professional training seminars and conferences related to HUD and
municipal governments. January, 2000.
• Continue to utilize the Internet to secure valuable information that relates to HUD.
October, 1999.
GOAL
• Increase citizen participation in the Consolidated Plan Budget process.
OBJECTIVES
• Develop a strategy to hold public hearings in low/moderate income neighborhoods,ghborhoods, in
order to receive input on the Consolidated Plan. November, 1999.
• Develop an aggressive plan to inform citizens of public hearings. December, 1999.
4 of 9
GOAL
• Evaluate the criteria to select public service agencies eligible to receive CDBG funding.
OBJECTIVES
• Revise the Public Service Application. January, 2000.
• Develop list of criteria and rating methodology. January, 2000.
• Improve advertising to inform public service agencies of the availability of applications.
February, 2000.
HOUSING DIVISION
The construction of new affordable houses, the provision of first-time home buyers' assistance
and the rehabilitation of older homes, are activities which help expand the City's residential tax
base. The objective is to develop viable urban communities and improve economic opportunities,
principally for persons of low and moderate income.
STRATEGIC ISSUES-FY 2000
Targeted Neighborhood Revitalization
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation (Elderly and Disabled Residents)
GOALS
• Construction and sale of fifteen(15) homes in targeted neighborhoods. FY 2000.
• Acquisition and site development of thirty(30)lots in neighborhoods outside of the
Charlton-Pollard Neighborhood. FY 2000.
• Rehabilitation of twenty-five(25) homes for elderly and disabled families. FY 2000.
BEA
UMONT CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
The primary mission of the Beaumont Convention& Visitors Bureau (CVB) is to promote the
city and surrounding area. The Bureau has the task of developing an image that will position
Beaumont in the marketplace as a viable destination for meetings and visitors, i.e. leisure travel.
It operates to solicit and serve visitors whether they be business travelers, convention delegates or
tourists, while placing a special emphasis on creating opportunities for those individuals to remain
overnight. Visitors are the critical element of the purpose of the CVB because of their significant
economic impact.
5 of 9
STRATEGIC ISSUES- FY 2000
Development and Promotion of Attractions in Beaumont's Downtown District
Current projects include the Jefferson Theatre restoration and The Crockett Street Entertainment-
area, the Neches River access and development should be paramount in plans addressing
downtown economic vitality.
Jefferson County Entertainment District
Assist in planning the proposed regional travel information center; supply pertinent data to help
develop marketing programs for the district's eclectic venue mix.
Regional Air Transportation
Encourage carriers currently serving the Southeast Texas Regional Airport to increase routes and
add jet service.
GOAL
• Produce and print Beaumont Nature Tourism Brochure.
OBJECTIVES
• Solicit corporate sponsorships to underwrite a minimum of two-thirds of the total cost
estimate of$15,000. December, 1999.
• Work with area outfitters, guides, and outdoor media writers to assure a completely
comprehensive and user friendly piece. January, 2000.
• Place advertisements in selected media promoting Beaumont as the center for nature
tourism activities on the upper Texas Gulf Coast. Ad inquiries will be fulfilled with the
new brochure. March, 2000.
• Print brochure. March, 2000.
• Sponsor familiarization trips for outdoor editors/writers throughout Texas and Louisiana
to publicize the area's emergence as a nature tourism destination. May 1, 2000.
GOAL
• Establish the Beaumont Sports Commission.
OBJECTIVES
• Identify those persons throughout the East Texas Gulf Coast region who are actively
involved in sporting activities. November, 1999.
6 of 9
• Promote Beaumont's sporting venues, especially the city's twelve diamond softball
complex and soccer fields. FY 2000.
• Develop new and improved venues for competitions/tournaments. September, 2000.
GOAL
• Establish two new festivals to coincide with the Spindletop 2001 celebration.
OBJECTIVES
46 Identify local organizations that will benefit from sponsoring and producing festivals.
These groups can generate funding for their operations and for their designated
beneficiaries. FY 2000.
• Encourage the new festivals to become annual events not just as a part of the Spindletop
2001 festivities. FY 2000.
• Produce first new festival/event. September, 2000
INTERNAL AUDIT
Internal Audit is an independent appraisal function established to examine and evaluate the
activities as a service to management. Audit work may include financial and compliance audits,
program results audits and economy and efficiency audits (operational-performance).
STRATEGIC ISSUES-FY 2000
Providing a comprehensive and flexible Internal Audit Program that will meet the needs of the
City Council, City Manager and Department Directors and document that the City's Internal
Controls are adequately safeguarding the assets of the City.
GOAL
• Develop an Annual Internal Audit Program outlining the audits that internal audit will
perform during the year that will provide time for special projects and administrative
activities.
OBJECTIVES
• Obtain recommendations from the City Manager and Department Directors on areas that
need to be audited or reviewed. August, 1999.
• Coordinate Internal Audit activities with the work of the Independent Auditor so the cost
of the total audit effort will be accomplished at the lowest possible cost. October, 1999 to
January, 2000.
7 of 9
s
GOAL
• Provide up to 500 hours of assistance to the City's Independent Auditors in conducting
the annual audit. By State Law the audited annual financial report must be delivered by
January 31, 2000(120 days after the fiscal year end of September 1999).
OBJECTIVES
• Work with the City's finance staff and independent auditors to ensure that the annual audit
is performed in a timely manner. October, 1999 to January, 2000.
Assist the finance staff in the preparation and editing of the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR)as needed. October, 1999 to January, 2000.
GOAL
• Conduct Internal Audits in compliance with the Profession Standards of the Institute of
Internal Auditors(HA) as defined in the Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal
Auditing. The Standards are summarized as follows: (1) The Internal Auditor shall be
independent of the activities audited. (2)Be performed by a staff having adequate
technical training and proficiency as auditors. (3) Adequately planned and properly
supervised. (4)Include a properly documented study of internal controls. (5) Obtain and
document sufficient relevant data to afford a reasonable basis for conclusions or
recommendations in the audit work papers.
OBJECTIVES
• Obtain a minimum of 120 hours of continuing professional education each 3 year period to
meet the requirements of the State of Texas Board of Public Accountancy to be licensed
to practice public accountancy in the State of Texas. FY 2000.
• Meet qualifications to perform Single Audits and other governmental audits by attending
24 hours of governmental accounting and auditing every 2 years. The 24 hour of
governmental accounting and auditing is part of the 120 hours listed above. FY 2000.
GOAL
• Prepare an annual Internal Audit Report for the City Council and City management to
include a list of audits conducted during the year, the amount of additional revenues, cost
savings, cost avoidance and other benefits that were generated by each audit, and the
status of the prior year audit recommendations.
OBJECTIVES
• Keep City Council and City management informed about audit activity, significant audit
findings and recommendations. October, 1999.
8 of 9
• Provide information on special projects explaining the purpose and scope, and an
assessment of how well internal audit goals and objectives are being met. October, 1999.
9 of 9
BUILDING CODES DIVISION
PERMITS FOR THE WEEK OF 9-10-99 THROUGH 9-16-99
COMMERCIAL PROJECTS
CONTRACTOR/OWNER ADDRESS COST
Premier Bldr - Build Convenience Store 310 M L King Pkwy $ 755,000
Owner - Build Warehouse for Lawn 655 Langham Rd. 40,000
Specialties
Bland Bldrs - Interior Remodel for Trike 1495 S. Major Dr. 40,000
Town USA
Teal Const - New Car Dealership for 1855 1 H 10 South 800,000
Autoplex 2000 Dodge
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
CONTRACTOR/OWNER ADDRESS COST
K E Wilcox - New Residence 8130 Medinah $ 128,000
Wingate Bldrs - New Residence 4935 Avie 80,000
C & B Service - Repair Fire Damage to 6644 Marshall Place 33,681
Residence
C & B Service - Repair Fire Damage to 6642 Marshall Place 20,871
Residence
Carroll Sherman- Repair Fire Damage to 2970 S. Major 20,000
Residence
Purpose Bldr- New Residence 1675 Amelia 104,000
Guseman Homes - New Residence 1605 Covington Court 250,000
Guseman Homes - New Residence 3570 Whittaker 159,000
Guseman Homes - New Residence 1670 Brighton Court 146,000
R & R Const - New Residence 7623 Washington 85,000
Friday,September 17,1999 5:03 PM To:Stephen Bonczek, From:Chris Giglio _ Page:2 of 4 -
C I T Y O F
RK-eport
B E A U M O N T Washington.
v.a. No.74 City of Beaumont--'vV:i hinMon Report
Senate Moving on FY 2000 Spending Bills
INSME Transportation 1' tl : tl trir,l nis>
7YUrr.duq'tnti;>rr ? .�i.�• ��.,,: -. i.i ill U� P ll: _tiret - ....
IilecAuui[ C emweic(. ....... 1
Senate easily passes DOT spending bill. 1'he
Hausin�mul c_D '
lrnir0ru!reut . ... . ... .. Senate passed the FY 2000 Transportation
Federalism .. ..... ........ 3 :'appropriations Bill this week, by.i\:etc of 95-0 0;°rL::;:•l:rn_, ;ii:d l;c a:: '.:.!! as. :.no`.`.:r;
Feder al Register.......... ... 3 The controversy surrounding the bill was bualpiu:: of psser. o
eliminated once the'transit equity provision"that i;i,.a ell ;i ui� ti:i.et h::lls1'_:s b l.veerr soli 1rs.
11'OUId have limited each state's t7 a11S1t 71te ?ll-!ll:c ill?tit'iS>arOn"!y C}�il0fr i"t t0 TI,C-.e
appq;tionment to 12.5 percent was chopped. 771e r s•,l.it in.::;
Senate's action now paves the way fur conference
Wide de House,which passed its o•.eli bill ni June.
Cfertronk. Commerce
The Senate bill provides a SI A billion increase j
over FY 1999 funding levels,mostly due.to tllc Ad i:;pr_J)_IXi ai=;i'Ca tJ=i 1_:luCi' c':Ctroric,
increases required by last year's TEA-21 law. c:omnlercee-; prot?o>sl s T e
Overall funding levels for the highway program icolllnlissb)% oil Electronic con--n erce lle:-I
are$28.9 billior-,up from this year's$27.3 billion. srcond mee ring. is New York-, and agareec to
Transit received a total of$5.79 billion,up f-orn ! piopot�i,!l,;t.tah jovcr.-,or_Berra:l Leavitt(F.):o
$5.3 billion. This breaks out to$3.1 billion for seek ov— -the unt rue;c.:1
I]ansit formula grails,up from$2.85 billion,and be t:rxd tau;,'and cash_•.. The. :'o?nuisslcr:r\;;>
$2.45 billion for transit capital investment grants, created in il,_irtemet Act v-1
an increase of$144 million. The transit capita] and is c!ia ertl with *udhi1: til; to:;a:ion ct
investments would be split in the following I ei.etnuic c::•ranerce il, _crieru e:acl li; to:•..rcn
rrmiliner: $490 million for buses and bus facilities ! c,f sales r,)er III,-, L1t:r;ter r,nd t; other rrra(-re
and$980 million each for the New Start rail and niecin„udi as teleplioivt and inai!order sal,_. T:1�
rail nlodemization programs. I (Conn n>Siun':sirs:submit a repolt to'..'onp J';
April nJ
OUrei Senate funding levels include:$375 nulhon ;
for highway safety programs; up from $361 Prior w lire meeting, mornanium had i)e,;,,
million; $571 million for Amtrak, a decrease of ( bl:ildinp tr,;•ai;i csemptin� n l sales over tin•)
$38 million from FY 2000 but the same as the hltermt ,•1011: slate ant! local Iso;vea..
President's request,and the Airport Improvement a:lveed+.es of tax-f llltemet !ed by 1'irz Lire
lf'aslurtgtorn Report Program(AM)was funded at$2 billion.up from Governor i.!.al Commc>slon C`hairmaa ?am-s
S1.95 billion vi FY 1999. Gilraoic i k�. Cornnn sioners I`ean Arch' (a
member of tie c.'aliforn,a Board of Equalizatiorin
Ca['011-11 C.Chlmev The Senate agreed to fuse-tune TEA 21 by and Coimiis�ioriea Grover Aorauist.(President v`
li"aS1w1g1o[t.-lssns:ant providing $1.6 billion inn highway funds, rather A_nie:ic:rus f;-.r T;IA Rrfcaat). w=_c lhwar:e:i bN
Ch[IIICV(QC[11111[!IC'tILC'.CO7!! i than the$1.4i billion set out in TF.A-21. More of co:!li?inn c,fri!il?c and`•rlvale se;:cor l:onirnissrr,
the highway Rands would also he distributers to member:. v i; ; surponed
Christopher F Grvlio
igl o n ca rlaledge.com tile.states rather than allow them to flow through Charles ::ch ca , CEO Davie F'onnuck se;.med t
P DOT. Transportation Appropriations i exliresr: the busilless perspective when Ale: said
Megan Lahfise[Tr Subcommittee Chairman Richard Shelby(R-AL) i that it was unportaia to address this problem
inegan;picapitaledge offered the amendment, which was approved I while it was'Marge eno,g i to be seem,but small
despite the objections of Senate Public Works enough to be solvable.'
1401 KStreet Nlf'-.Suite 700 I
Committee Chairman Jolni Chafee (R-RI). This I
ltnshingtoaDC30005-3401 i provision is expected to cause quite a bit of i The Comas,-ion was apparendy swayed t:)
,1203)842-4930 i controversy in conference, since the House bill support i,eavit;'s props,>al aftcr hearing from
,Fax:%2031 842-50 1 closely adheres to 7T.A-21 formula allocations. Hennepin (eOMAV, ?�.f't' Fioard Chairman Ron-1
Friday,September 11',1999 5'03 _To:Stephen Sonczek From:Chris Giglio Page-3 of 4.
2 September 17, 1999 V1 an,Kngtov 1 t:p:et
Johnson and Richmond, VA City i mcreme of$25 million over FY 1999`tevels. Environment
Couucilnlenuber Joseph Brooks. Testifying There were scv'eral set-asides hti ilhil CD13G,
on behalf of the Cotuhcil of State including$42.5 million for Y outhbuild and
Govennnents, the International City/County 1 $110 million in individual Senators' EPA 1,endill_ anL'lov-(! rev
%tanagers' association, file National ! demonstration projects. in FY 1999, set- �I ovrialivus'.1,t:r_;_it_r Tile _', '_•. ,I
Cvnfereuce of State Legislatures, the asides totaled 5533 iin!lion. Section ling La'ircnm ntal Prcte::icr: _•.a; ;, i ':n
vatiorsal Association of Counties, the loan guarantees would remain at $1.'_61 budget tens❑pp:c 'd al I;: a> , „1
National Gvlcrlors' Association, the billion end tile' NC\lE Inestruellt IL.
_N Monal League of Cil1CS, and the Lnited Partnership; program mold be fnlndal at Ill]! Una; wus clr:vc,! (,)I [r- .. .IC'!_
Slate's Coulerence of\=layers. Johnson and the FY 1999 level of$i 6 billiuu. rrznsure provides S7 = ion i,-, _
Yr„ol:s al;cued that the o%vih of sales over 5
>'t acu���lics, dv�,��n v-:1 _ . _r *_ _, i
tl,e hitternet could seriously impact state and The committer iecoinmenled Sl.02 bilhcn I CO0
Ic,cal r::vonue. Creak a class of elite Pot homeless a>sist:nncc laagrams, ill:• from
merchants, not subject to sales taxes, and $9 25 million it FY 11,)09 However. the I lie I>il1 incluci s 1.? :i:r.
crape a "diaital divide•` between taxpayers commit.tce would also r..quire that iii revolving 1 Il
+; n seers$to the Initelilet and those without percent of those fwnds be allocated toward !e:c 1 d, F
hlli•171e1 accvss Commissioners hear:'] the permanent housing as well as a 25 percent ' l!naln 1LC CIVI(ol
opposite fionn a number of organizations, match for federal funds used for homeless 11,esat rri,nl:ingre,'r.1;TIR�•rrn
most of them representing the electronic services. The Section 202 elderly housing also stay at its 1 1 ly?:
s�mmerc:e industn-%•. Ill addition, prior to the program would receive S-0.1 million- am ni!li:>; 1'i c Cr roar;cc r•_cc•:rr: .
mCCiring, 're' _�T'enp Of thirty-five members of ,, increase of Sow milGmn. •,while housing f,r :uii],cvn
Congiess led by House Majority Leader the disabled would remain at the FY 194(99 Siot,
Richard Amie)' (R-TX) sent a letter j level•of$194 million- of S1 million, Tine
warning file Commission not to consider would also be redncccy l:-y l!
rn 0'. ?.Ellen. to
allowing state aril local governments to ( The committee also provided no finds for j 51.4 million. That tuta', ilciuc
collect sales taxes front Internet sales. the second round of' tine Empowerment million for bic-s ifrelc'_
Zones program and funded the Brownfield$ initiatives, $914 nulholn liar c.pc:iiuxl
Linder Leavitt's proposal, the Commission i redevelopment program at$25 million,the ; rc ponso activities, and S.'14,; milli.-11 for
wIl l accept plans that meet set criteria(to be I sane level as FY 1999. The public housing i Superfund enforcement.
posted oil the Corrunission;web site)fiom capital fund would be decreased by $445 ;
�uokips supported by three Commission million.. but [lie$3.55 billion level was the Sponsors o_`the V.,
members. The Cotmnission will discuss tlhe 1 same as tie Presidents request. Drug Agellciec< bill hop to Ili.!_ it u:
plans at their next meeting, to be held in elimination grafts for public housing would consid-naiion uem vrecl_
S:a I Francisco on December 14-15, 1999. A remain at$310 million:.
transcript of the New York meeting will be
also be posted on the Commission's web The Senate bill would also provide $80 ! Federalism
site at t+irmecouuuerceco»uuission.org. million for the Community Development
Fi.•hancial Institutions (C•DFI) program, the j House sponsor drop; off its tn�h; .r„
Housing and CD same level as FY 1999, The Americorps federalism lestslatlnn
program would receive a slight reduction, Davin Macirltosi: f R 1' j t'_r
dovnal$2 million to$4'_3.5 million. Economic Growli. Nowr_:1 Rezo,Jrc•e, ,_d
Senate panel sends II D spending bill to ; Regulatory _`f aII s S:bco nmittce f
fl o'--) The Senate Appropriatioms Senate leaders hope to bring the bill to the I House Goveriment Rcf,,t1M Corin?iile-1 '.-e;
Conunittee approved its version of the FY 1 floor next week. One amendment that is diapped his plans to pursue
2000 VA.HUD,and Independent Agencies j expected to stir controversy would allow 22145)that would ]have est;; ,li hed s,, ;ci-r
appropriations bill yesterday, one day after 1 law-abiding grin owner,whose stolen guns guidelines for Executive Bmr.ch at;.r
it was passed on the subcommittee level_ show up ii a new,HIUD-sponsored buyback decision, that affect s,:,te a i i=c;31
The overall bill is lsrger than its I-louse I prograrn(pail of the drug elimination grants) governments.
counterpart, as a result of a maneuver by ! to get these guns back. Senator Larry Craig
Appropriations Committee Chairman Ted (R-ID) attempted to offer the amencimont IM 2445 would requie feceml 1:vr,,4.r.xr,
Stevens (R-AK) to add $7.2 billion to the during the committee markup but vvas to i;le'ntify airy s.cti,r.? �f Ie�_slatic:: tics
measure. j persuaded to wait until the bill reached the j would preempt local auth.-rirr 111 d r s ss
j floor. expected costs of new legislation to i,,cai.
HUD progams did not suffer lame and state governments. It•,vuuld also r°qt�ira
reductions in tine bill,with the exception of I the federal agencies to consult with :.oven
a nnolatornun oil new Section 8 incremental major state and local inierest ar,,r,ps
vouchers. The. Community Development inchidinr2, tie U.S. Cotnterenee o":i&yc s,
Block Grant (CDBG) program would be j the .rational Lea the of Cinc>, a._,' onto
funded at 54.8 billion in FY 2000, an j v,burr;?1 Association of Ca
1s!aa:-'`5`Friday;September 17,1999 5 03 PM To:Stephen Bonczek From:Chris Giglio Page:4 of 4
■3 September 17, 1999 Washington tce,:at t
determining performance standards for state- Department of Housing and urban Department of Houcinu and tTrb.:n
administered federal grant piogtanns. Development, September 14: The Office ties c•iaplgent, Septeunaer. 1-5: 11, L.r;
of the Assistant Secretary for Public and i iss,,cd a rule ensuring that federally-a_sisted
There are reports that hiacintoslu. who is a Indian Housing has proposed a rule that holeiug aid federalhL-owned heusina ttJe'.is
candidate foi Goyemor in tidiarra. was would implement a new formula syst°m to to t•: ;o!d do nit pus: l ad b.t":e,t pt ;
persuaded to drop Ills eflbns at the urging of ! public housing agencies for their capital r .runs t•� cini:c er.. ;r:troy: is
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. which needs. Comments are due by October 14, ef9 eti: 1:cverni-er 15. 1(99 :'l
stiorloly 01-,,poses the legisl;tiou. 17Je 1999. Pages 49933- 49939.
Chamber feared that the le-Ishilion would
lead to an tmoreamzed and difficult-to- Department of Housing and Urbarr
foPo-kV series of state laws and lawsuits. ! Development, September 14: The Offrcc i-orpormion for \Aiollai a:at
Macintosh Lad been able to pass the of the Assistant Secretary for Pubh. a;,(] C•:rmmuui1v Serrice, 5epreu.be?' 'L: !
]cwslation through hr,subcormni;tcc but tyre Indian Housing has ploposeci a ruli, that ;or ' a I n i ;:I:d
--harilbel s opposition doomed its chances describes the requirements and proccdiire3
of bei%approved in lhr full cornnrlitcd- regulating a new statutory llomeowneiNdhip ���.i?t1.'JiJr�U.ilI% L 1]rec''�c 1
program to be admiustered by public :vv:;!e tecl,cical an ;c:r:a ist*`.;a
On the oilier hand, local government ' housing agencies. This rule would permit a :::li;,po:r ti;r ih. Prr_.ida:,;':• S:i:c'
oreanizations have been very supportive of PI-LAto make public housing dwelling utut;. ptt;ralr,
tine bill and hope to work with Senate j public housing projects, and other housing '-wh(anr:�!Jips tO L;igll cLool ar:.ic>a a:.ci
Goverrnment Affair Committee c'!;airmtan projects available for purchase by low-
Fred scJ;:r rr ::its�ncli:_c arheir.i cr: n
Fred Thompson (R-I" ) on c;tmilal income families as their princi a]
leerslation• residences. Comments are clue NOVelnbl9 25 10"Y.
j 15, 1999. Pages 49931 -49935.
' Federal Register
Department of the Interior, Septembr 1'leasea no*e thin AJegaa I ulr:is,r:i
14: The Bureau of Indian Affairs has has ieceirtlp joined our staff acrd one
The following items have appeared in the announced that it is reopening the comment of her primarrp dirties will he.
Federal Register since September 13, 1999 I period for the proposed rule on the i r'search and coordination of rederai
Additional information may be obtained acquisition of title to land in trust. grants If pmr are iuterc+led ire
from this office. Comments are now due by October 1 ,,rpl;in,jot rap of tlia cg�port.>niiies
1999- Page 49756, listed, picese conga: !ter by
Department of Labor,September 13:The teleplxnre at i307)84-4930 or ria c-
inplo}mnent and Trail Administration is ! Department of Housing and Urban � /rail ru taegatr iccalfitaledgeconr
seeking grant applicalionz, for regional Development, September 14: The Oftice
consortium building grants. These grants of the Assistant Secretary for Public and
will support the creation and development Indian Housing has issued a final rule
of regional sl_ills consortia to assess ! amending HUD regulations to replace
employer skill creeds to assess the need for HUD's Public and Indian Housing 1)nr
closing the gaps between shills desired by i Elimination Program fwnds competitive
industry alai the skills held by regional grant program with a formula allocation
workers. Proposals are due Novennber 15, funding system. This rule is effective
1999.Pages 49513-49531. October 14,1999. Applications for eligibl.!
PHAs are also due October 14, 1999. Pages
Department of Housing and Urban 49599_49933.
Development, September 14: 'the Office
of the assistant Secretary for Public and Department of Justice, September 13:
(Indian Housing has proposed a rule that i The Bureau of Justice Assistance is
would implement a new statutory provision I amencling the Federal law Enforcement
to authorize public housing agenncies to Dependents Assistance Program to expand
administer their housing programs thiough ! tine scope of eligibility for funancial
a consortium of PHAs. Also, PSI-is would ! assistance for higher education to the
i
have the option of using subsidiaries,joint i dependents of public safety officers. This
ventures, partnerships or other business j rule is effective September 14, 1999. Pages
arrangements to manage their programs. 49953-49954.
Comments are due by November 15, 1999.
Pages 49939-493-1.
i
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the FY 2000 Capital Program is hereby adopted. The Capital Program is
substantially in the form-attached hereto as Exhibit "A". A public hearing was held at 1:30
PM on August 31, 1999 in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Beaumont, Texas.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
1999.
-
MAYOR -
Capital Program 2000
General Improvements
Amount
Current PrQjects
Athletic Complex- Softball fields $ 1,530,000
Beaumont Yacht Club Additions 850,000
Fire Station Construction 2,750,000
Fire Training Center Improvements 1,430,000
Municipal Court Building 1,870,000
Parks Maintenance Facility 700,000
Perlstein Park 150,000
Total $ 9,280,000
Scheduled PrQjects
Airport Runway Extension $ 1,430,000
Police Building Renovation 300,000
Southend Branch Library Construction 1,500,000
Total $ 3,230,000
Planned Projects
Streets & Drainage Maintenance Facility $ 750,000
EXHIBIT "A"
Capital Program 2000
Public Works Improvements
Amount
Current Projects
Major Drive $ 4,000,000
Concord Road - Phase 1 2,700,000
Neches River Hike and Bike Trail 3,000,000
Walden Road - Major to IH-10 8,070,000
Walden Road - Ditch 109 590,000
Ector Street Ditch 500,000
Total $_ 18,860,000
Scheduled Projects
Concord Road - Phase II (Includes Prince Street outfall) $ 9,400,000
Concord Road - Phase III (Includes Concord Road North outfall) 4,550,000
Walden Road - IH-10 to Fannett 800,000
Phelan Boulevard - Major Drive to West of Westbrook 1,500,000
Folsom Road - Dowlen to Major 3,300,000
Total s-191550,000
Planned Projects
Franklin Street- ML King to Neches $ 200,000
Caldwood Outfall 3,300,000
Moore Street Relief 4,000,000
Old Dowlen - SH 105 Connector 2,600,000
Total $=10.100,000
EXHIBIT "B"
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF
TAFT STREET TO BROWNSTONE DRIVE IN BEAUMONT,
JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT Taft Street running west from West Lucas Drive through Brownstone Subdivision
and ending in Christina Court, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, as shown on Exhibits
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, be and the same is hereby renamed
to Brownstone Drive.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
1999.
- Mayor-
mmZm
� � f cc e1 cc -
m
s 3niaa
Os� \
• r.1.t. �r �� it vm�Q) ♦1 —.t IY.•
a St ,9bZl
I
�- _------ ;------- -------
•" m ^ a+
t I
..-_ ---------------
* I r
J ,
• N w �
i
•
--------------------- ' I ---»• r
N Q,
So
h I
„ � f
r
y
1 I
n � M
h • � I
• y I
h Y i .• Q u
- IiQ. � Q m • i `J
.y. m
I
n y I e
b •
-- -------------�--j-- .-----------------
o
I
-- ----- -_---- ---.. - ---..._----�IaC' E
a
f
-•- ---•-------- -----Lj
at loot
• f
• ° � ussra u.•
y a4 anY•rr• d
-- e
OSl :s A51 j
b
Abv ' „v
I o
I y
�• J
EXHIBIT "A"
nsa ■
a�►
�.......,/�n— --
n 27 >r 25 i. x> >a 21 30 to of n a is 14 u u It _•�..:�•n we—s.r
II I
III
71 ' it m ' rI . as w I --
_' ~TI I
fit zzz
COOLY!!oov" I ooana sv m III•
� �— ------- --- •III
71
28 12
X II I 1 � II I
TS Ie ' a 11 11 II I
I
Stole 1• a 50'
Q7
r
�.a.rw��otwt►.tnr I I I ,. ���p�•
•
Ro wtr>..a...tts ovum I A PRF1.JwM�lARY PLAT OF
oos����«����«�• ��'"�� � •��-~ "" I - I I---- CHHIBTINA COURT
-- -• ; i
49 Urunm u¢vao *WT) 1 I I A FtEPLAT OF
Yr. : s • , 1 Meta oswas teOfi!!af>t Mta�o I if I ( LOU a•.0•a aouc«
12811MAN men ••••�••1°�•••
w-�•' ���
I 1 I an a M u n.toa u
f►NS . 9-IT wW W. LOTS a foe a.am a
Lori If am V.KOM h
.•...a ...-....M Y.�.•Y w.. I I I I Cale moa..os onDram
���p� %CL+K Lt PAW IN,LUNG
LOU I Iwo
.ww r....w..•....rw-. r•�'w Ji.wtr�n wrt r-w.iii I I
w.•-i..a d Get w�°..�Z.•1..rr`w M.i"wi �.w...r rr I I �TTrr. SMM
„•.w.��.��...r...�.t w« � -mss r�
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the claim of Southwestern Bell has been discussed in an Executive
Session properly called and held Tuesday, September 7, 1999; and,
WHEREAS, the Council desires to authorize the settlement of the claim;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Attorney be and he is hereby authorized to settle the claim of Southwestern
Bell in the amount of Eighty-one Thousand Six-Hundred Eighty-six and 24/100
($81,686.24) Dollars.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
1999.
- Mayor -
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, bids were received on August 16, 1999, for construction of the
Delaware Outfall for the Concord Road Pavement Widening Project Contract IIA; and;
WHEREAS, Excavators & Constructors, Inc., submitted a bid for construction of the
Delaware Outfall for the Concord Road Pavement Widening Project Contract IIA in the
amount of$5,024,678.32; and,
WHEREAS, City Council is of the opinion that the bid submitted by Excavators &
Constructors, Inc. should be accepted,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the bid submitted by Excavators & Constructors, Inc. for construction of the
Delaware Outfall for the Concord Road Pavement Widening Project Contract IIA in the
amount of$5,024,678.32 be accepted by the City of Beaumont.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day
of , 1999.
- Mayor -
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the Mayor be, and he is hereby authorized to approve the proposed IH-10 Frontage
Roads Project schematic. The limits of the project are from Walden Road to FM 364
(Major Drive).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
1999.
- Mayor -
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS bids were received for a five- (5) year financing agreement with a fixed
interest rate of 5.29% for the purchase of a Pierce Lance Fire Pumper; and, I
WHEREAS, Banc One Leasing Corporation, Corsicana, Texas, submitted a bid at
the rate of 5.29%; and,
WHEREAS, City Council is of the opinion that the bid submitted by Banc One
Leasing Corporation, Corsicana, Texas should be accepted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the bid submitted by Banc One Leasing Corporation, Corsicana, Texas, for a five-
(5) year financing agreement with a fixed interest rate of 5.29% for the purchase of a
Pierce Lance Fire Pumper be accepted by the City of Beaumont.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
1999.
- Mayor -
i
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to execute an agreement between
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and the City of Beaumont in the
amount of$142,582 to widen and improve the grade crossing on Walden Road.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
11999.
- Mayor -
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to enter into a three-(3) year
contract with Prudential Insurance Company of America for Long Term Disability insurance
for the City of Beaumont effective January 1, 2000.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
11999.
- Mayor-
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Council hereby approves authority for the City Manager or his designee to
initiate lawsuits and settle claims involving third-party workers' compensation claims.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all third-party workers' compensation claims presented
for lawsuits and settlement must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's office.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day
of , 1999.
- Mayor -
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, in July, 1997, the City Council of the City of Beaumont, Texas,
executed an agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDot) and
Drainage District No. 6 ((DD#6) for drainage improvements to the Ector Street Ditch
Crossing of US 69, 96, and 287 in the total low bid amount of $1,203,163.39, the City's
one-third cost being $401,054.63 ; and,
WHEREAS, during the course of the project, Change Order No. 1 is required in the
amount of $75,735 to increase the amount of temporary special shoring to the actual
quantity used on the project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Manager be, and he is hereby authorized, to execute Change Order No.
1 in the amount of$75,735 increasing the City's one-third contract amount to $476,789.63.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont on this the
day of , 1999.
- Mayor -
COMMENTS FROM DEPARTMENTS AND/OR UTILITY COMPANIES
FOR
LICENSE TO ENCROACH APPLICATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 501 Washington Boulevard - described as being adjacent to `
Lot 2 in Block 5, Arlington Addition, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas. Said encroachment being
the installation of groundwater monitoring well onto the City's one hundred foot (100') Washington
Boulevard right-of-way.
APPLICANT: Corrigan Consulting, Inc. as agent for Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd.
DATE OF DISTRIBUTION: August 27, 1999
1) Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer Date Received: 9-1-99
Acceptance and approval.
2) Don Burrell, Code Enforcement Date Received: 8-30-99
Acceptance and approval.
3) Micky Bertrand, Fire Department Date Received: 9-3-99
Acceptance and approval.
4) S. A. Webb, Water Utilities Date Received: 9-2-99
Acceptance and approval. Notify Water Utilities 48 hours prior to working site for live
locates.
5) Stephen Richardson, Planning Department Date Received: 8-30-99
Acceptance and approval.
6) Mark Horelica, Traffic Administrator Date Received: 8-30-99
Acceptance and approval.
7) Jeff Steely, ENTEX Corporation Date Received: 9-15-99
Acceptance and approval.
8) James Bryant, Entergy Date Received: 9-13-99
Acceptance and approval.
9) Steve Bush, Southwestern Bell Telephone Date Received: N/A
SWBT has informed the City that they will pursue a separate and independent
license agreement with the property owners for an additional fee.
10) Richard Le Blanc, DD #6 Date Received: 9-8-99
Acceptance and approval.
11) Tyrone Cooper, Legal Department Date Received: 9-14-99
Acceptance and approval.
encroach.com
SUBJECT
LICENSE TO ENCROACH
WASHINGTON BLVD. z c � AN rE a ao ORTE BUR
RIGHT-OF-WAY
FOR MADIS11N
W Y Z R 19EL r S O
INSTALLATION OF w as a < H VAN Y BUF EN W _
A GROUNDWATER R B rs a _
MONITORING WELL PR a LE LEE S Ry
ATE L
q HINT � r2C
HARRIL]T a
APPLICANT: CORRIGAN PI A E. ALM
CONSULTING, INC.O H EA NE DL E. Tn ADN EDL �s
SPEEDY STOP FOOD TORES, LTD. ELGIE z P o
z E. ELG
Y CH RC z Z = a ,CHURL
a PI IN = H A 9�PKM
J
07
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY...
I r
-PROPOSED - WELL
MONIT-ORINO �.
WASHINGTON BLVD. q�
ja
7 B 9
P ,3 4 3 t
Q
b0
5' 24 ' 150
2
50' 50 s-r.
oSEO 3 �� 30 60
-IP
YG 9
= I /8 /7 � !6 !S �'� c
2 �!
SO j3 A
4p V
r
N
Q
O
N
N.T.S.
E
Cit y of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a
sanitary sewer line easement.
RECOMMENDATION
The Trustees of the New Testament Holiness Church have conveyed a ten foot wide Sanitary
Sewer Line Easement to the City of Beaumont on their property described as being out of Lot 1,
Block 118 of the Pinecrest Addition.
Administration recommends acceptance of the easement.
BACKGROUND
There is an existing sanitary sewer line in the alley at the rear of their property. The adjoining
property owner is a cemetery. The alley has been fenced and graves are located over the sewer
line. A new sewer line will be installed to serve the church and the line running through the
cemetery will be abandoned.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny authorizing the acceptance of a sanitary sewer line easement. `
SUBJECT
- VAUGHN
LUCAS
= Z IVE CREST F RWAY
PROPOSED ACCEPTANCE W N 9 TRINIDAD
OF A SANITARY SEWER
LINE EASEMENT PARRY
u H h ZQ,
OUT OF LOT I, BLOCK 118 W y
OF THE PINECREST
PIE C o
ADDITION a BukHAl IA W $
a GILL�+
HAYES j ¢ �y �'! E thony
HYDR00 r UTI W > Z a cem
K TOLE 0 ~ h HALE
Z
LEIGH v~i vvi
A
TAFT IVES r -J L
OWNERS NEW TESTAMENT EARL W IN
HOLINESS CHURCH I PRIMR SE EA L 0 �
LEGEND LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
6 -
sl
BUGS �
N.T.S.
7
O � z
l
�s�
...... City of Beaumont Council Agenda� EL g Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager
MEETING DATE: September 21, 1999
AGENDA MEMO DATE: September 14, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a street name change from Taft Street
to Brownstone Drive.
RECOMMENDATION
The administration recommends approval of the request.
BACKGROUND
The name change is for Taft Street in the Brownstone and Christina Court subdivisions.
Stephen Brown, developer of Brownstone Subdivision, and Bill Little, developer of Christina
Court Subdivision, have requested this name change. Mr. Brown owns eight of the eleven lots
in Brownstone. Mr. Little owns all of the lots in Christina Court. Mr. Brown has contacted
the other two property owners in Brownstone and they are in favor of the name change.
This application is in compliance with City of Beaumont Resolution, No. 88-231, Street
Naming Policy. There is not another street with the same name or phonetic sound of another
local street. The new name is for a complete street and the name represents no commercial
endorsement.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None
PREVIOUS ACTION
At the September 8, 1999 Regular Meeting, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend
approval of this request.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED BY
Planning Commission, City Manager and Planning Manager
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny a request for a street name change from Taft Street to Brownstone Drive in the
Brownstone and Christina Court subdivisions.
Stephen D. Brown
Brownstone Investment Corporation
,
Date: June 28, 1999.
To: City of Beaumont
I am hereby requesting that Taft Street running west from West Lucas Drive through
Brownstone Subdivision be changed to Brownstone Drive. This part of Taft Street will
cul-de-sac and end in Christina Court which W. T. (Bill)Little is developing. This part of
Taft Street is isolated from any other part of Taft Street and will never be connected. I
still own eight of the eleven lots on Taft Street in Brownstone Subdivision and Bill Little
still owns all the lots on Taft Street in Christina Court Subdivision. Bill Little concurs
with this request.
Since
Stephen D.Brown
Brownstone Investment Corporation . T. (Bill)Little
fill _.
rig YYK
Z40 �1Nil
mmZ� ��,A
Ilvai <L7Ovi:D I
311.4
3n1aa sd on'i'--
• • �..�. V• HO"W JI vm
o�Sl � ,9'btl
a;----------------------- L-------- ------
ol
m of
� � N
M
� y
N w �
------------N.__--_.� ' ' --__---------- W
N psi
N
N 1 �
i
h
r �
OI r ,^� N l d i
Q , N
J � •s.
s
D
6
o •
1
a
e C
•� a•r arr�..ew .1 E
-- ASl
.OSI •� i
:1
� �o S
aw .�•+r
m m 29 24 23 22 21 20 U ,s 17 is Is 14 ,! 12 II I
II I
II I
N N u
20 2, 22 t2 ! 24
• ti ^P it COOLC,z s,tiar III•
ao>trrnr�1DOOt! /� 25 !II It
\ _______ _ �/ `•111`.
—��— -------- --_it
�. 17 Is 12 II I
is � +• � +• �I I I III
•�,�,>�_ . .. W II I III
II II I
Scale 1. 50 r r �. I ' n II I
21 • . , 11 It 1s II I I ' •
e�ww•ewe L1M
MA �M I•
w r�..r1 w • I r ` I!
swlss�rl�lr�a+f� h �;r,
-
2• Yir � • � • • �
7 >
ww~ia�•✓6.t t I
A PRELAlIARY PLAT
n Rnw w�a.���•waa OF
IX.IM INS 4m r00wrwL10a.rrwrr
R...,,..r. •""' CHRISTINA COURT
.....�..=rw w rr.wc a.. r.° I + ———
•.• 49 I I A REPEAT OF
(�u�oeveuorllot� I
so voltim t Avw +I) I I W"a•n•«.BLOC a
swat 2 ] • s • ..r�.wasw !I I I LM 12 s••1 V.•LOOK 42
LIM.ri. rt r�rZ•w I I LOU R Ift 47.<OCK 42
"lot LOTS to Ml V.■ M t7
r...w 1Ki,wf wrurw wr.w wiwr.r�w r w. II I I L4=HIO•NOi pf1D1lOL
u.•�.w war I I I VOUM LI PACE 1.,YJ,.tG
�.—.•Z a err.r.n.a r+.w.rwt w
�.�.r..rw�.►r w r.. INTO s.:.—«._...iw•..w: "• I I Lon+7NM1 is
Ilr� �.T�rr rr�w.•. I ( ocaaac vn o:raar,nrt.•Le.
wr.wwrurwar rww.rrw.rr.nr • _ •Z!!w `..SLO•!!�.+t•� �.��j..rr.�=rr.waw.r� I I
.�s
Mw- .r wrrrrw.
1 I E9'['1'Z I §RwMj
.I.Mw�1 rMi�Mw wr r.wwt w.s �-.•1.
.. wi.w a7o.�rO rrw r� •� r
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF
TAFT STREET TO BROWNSTONE DRIVE IN BEAUMONT,
JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT Taft Street running west from West Lucas Drive through Brownstone Subdivision
and ending in Christina Court, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, as shown on Exhibits
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, be and the same is hereby renamed
to Brownstone Drive.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of
' 1999.
- Mayor -