HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET NOV 02, 2004 wiftr�
�.J
City of Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 2,2004 1:30 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA
* Approval of minutes
* Confirmation of committee appointments
A) Authorize the payment of fiscal year 2005 dues to the South East Texas Regional Planning
Commission(SETRPC)
B) Authorize the settlement of the claim of Leah Wingate
A
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Andrea S. Deaton, Budget Officer
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 28, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Authorize the payment of fiscal year 2005 dues to the South East
Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC) in the amount of$42,702.32.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval of the payment of fiscal year 2005 dues to the South East
Texas Regional Planning Commission in the amount of$42,702.32.
BACKGROUND
The SETRPC was established in June of 1970 under enabling legislation as a voluntary association
of local governments. Its purpose is to encourage and permit local governments to join and
cooperate with one another to improve the health and safety of their citizens; to plan for future
development and transportation efforts; and to recognize the needs of agriculture, business and
industry, among other things.
The City of Beaumont supports the SETRPC and the community projects they perform. Some of
the programs these dues will fund are the Criminal Justice Program; the Area Agency on Aging
(AAA) Program; the Homeless Coalition; the Foster Grandparents (FGP) Program; and the
Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP).
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Funding is available and budgeted for this expenditure in the General Fund.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None,
RECOMMENDED BY: City Manager
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
2210 Eastex Freeway
Beaumont, Texas 77703-4929
(409) 899-8444
October 19, 2004
INVOICE
City of Beaumont
P O Box 3827
Beaumont, Texas 77704
FY 2005 SETRPC MEMBERSHIP DUES
SETRPC Dues $13,663.92
Criminal Justice Programs $1,874.34
AAA Program $10,903.02
Homeless Coalition $9,298.56
FGP Program $2,661.28
RSVP Program $4,301.20
Total Invoice $42,702.32
THANK YOU
PLEASE RETURN YELLOW COPY WITH PAYMENT
�� City of Beaumont
qw_
� EL
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Matt Martin, Liability Administrator
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 28, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider a resolution authorizing the settlement of the
claim of Leah Wingate.
RECOMMENDATION
Council approval of a resolution authorizing the settlement of the claim of Leah Wingate.
BACKGROUND
Council authorized the settlement of this claim in Executive Session September 29, 2004.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
There are sufficient funds in the Liability Trust Fund to pay the settlement amount as
shown:
Leah Wingate & Provost & Umphrey Law Firm $11,500
Provost & Umphrey Law Firm
PO Box 4905
Beaumont, TX 77704
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and City Attorney.
G:\CG\AGENDAIRESOLUTIICLAIMLAW.DOC\AGEN MEMO-CLAIM\WINGATE-C-S O4-061--11-04.wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the claim of Leah Wingate has been discussed in an Executive Session
properly called and held Tuesday, September 29, 2004; and,
WHEREAS, the Council desires to authorize the settlement of the claim;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
THAT the City Attorney be and he is hereby authorized to settle the claim of Leah Wingate
in the amount of Eleven-Thousand Five-Hundred ($11,500) Dollars payable to Leah
Wingate and Provost & Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 2nd day of
November, 2004.
--------------------------------
- Mayor Evelyn M. Lord -
1~
City of Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 2,2004 1:30 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL, TO ORDER
* Invocation Pledge Roll Call
* Presentations and Recognition
* Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items 1-6/Consent
Agenda
* Consent Agenda
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. Consider approving an ordinance authorizing the issuance of City of Beaumont,
Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2004 and authorizing the
advance refunding of certain bonds and obligations
2. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a Multiple Use Agreement with
the Texas Department of Transportation(TxDOT) for the future M.L. King Park
statue site
3. Consider approving the allocation of$7,500 to be used as a revenue guarantee for
Delta Airlines to provide air service from the Southeast Texas Regional Airport to
Atlanta, Georgia
4. Consider amending Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinance to adopt new regulations
regarding solicitation in and alongside streets
5. Consider amending Ordinance No. 04-041 relating to the structure located at 3491
W. Euclid
6. Consider amending Ordinance No, 04-041 relating to the structure located at 2925
Harriot
COMMENTS
* Councilmembers/City Manager comment on various matters
* Public Comment(Persons are limited to 3 minutes)
EXECUTIVE SESSION
* Consider matters related to contemplated or pending litigation in
accordance with Section 551.071 of the Government Code:
City of Beaumont vs. House of Praise Deliverance Ministry, Inc.
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids
or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 884-3725 a day prior to the meeting.
1
November 2,2004
Consider approving an ordinance authorizing the issuance of City of Beaumont, Texas, General
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2004 and authorizing the advance refunding of certain bonds
and obligations
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kandy Daniel, Treasurer
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 29, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider an ordinance authorizing the issuance of City of
Beaumont, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2004, authorizing the advance
refunding of certain bonds and obligations and the execution and delivery of an escrow agreement
and the subscription for and purchase of certain escrowed securities; and containing other matters
related thereto.
RECOMMENDATION
The Administration requests approval of an ordinance authorizing the issuance of approximately
$12,365,000 City of Beaumont, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2004,
authorizing the advance refunding of certain bonds and obligations and the execution and delivery of
an escrow agreement and the subscription for and purchase of certain escrowed securities; and
containing other matters related thereto.
BACKGROUND
On October 26, 2004, First Southwest Company, Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Estrada
Hinojosa&Company,Inc.,and Southwest Securities,Inc.were selected by City Council to provide
underwriting services on the above mentioned bonds.
The bonds will mature March 1, 2006 through March 1, 2014 with interest payable semiannually.
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.,Houston, Texas will serve as paying agent/registrar and JP Morgan Chase
Bank, Dallas, Texas will serve as escrow agent on the refunded bonds. Delivery and receipt of
proceeds by the City is expected to be on December 2,2004. Proceeds will be used to refund certain
outstanding obligations ofthe City including portions ofthe 1995 Certificates ofObligation,the 1996
Refunding Bonds and the 1996 Certificates of Obligation. The refunding is expected to produce a
net cost savings to the City of approximately$550,000.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
All debt shall be incurred in the Debt Service Fund which is supported by property taxes.
PREVIOUS ACTION
A resolution was approved by City Council on October 26, 2004 to approve the selection of an
underwriter for approximately$12,365,000 City ofBeaumont General Obligation Refunding Bonds.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer.
DRAFT
ORDINANCE NO.
NO. 4
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
TEXAS, GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2004,
AUTHORIZING THE ADVANCE REFUNDING OF CERTAIN BONDS AND
OBLIGATIONS AND THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN ESCROW
AGREEMENT AND THE SUBSCRIPTION FOR AND PURCHASE OF CERTAIN
ESCROWED SECURITES; AND CONTAINING OTHER MATTERS RELATED
THERETO
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON §
THE CITY OF BEAUMONT §
WHEREAS, The City of Beaumont, Texas (the "City") has heretofore issued its City of
Beaumont, Texas, Refunding Bonds, Series 1996, its City of Beaumont, Texas, Combination Tax
& Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1996, and its City of Beaumont, Texas, Combination
Tax & Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1995 (collectively the 'Refunded Obligations"),
and now desires to refund a portion of certain maturities of the Refunded Obligations in advance of
their maturities in order to provide a savings in debt service; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 1207, Texas Government Code, as amended(formerly Article 717k of
Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, as amended), authorizes the City to issue refunding
bonds for the purpose of refunding the Refunded Obligations in advance of their maturities, and to
accomplish such refunding by depositing directly with any paying agent for the Refunded
Obligations the proceeds of such refunding bonds,together with other available funds,in an amount
sufficient to provide for the payment or redemption of the Refunded Obligations, and provides that
such deposit shall constitute the making of firm banking and financial arrangements for the
discharge and final payment or redemption of the Refunded Obligations; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to call certain of the Refunded Obligations for
redemption prior to their maturities; and
WHEREAS, the City also desires to authorize the execution of an escrow agreement in
order to provide for the deposit of proceeds of the refunding bonds to pay and redeem the Refunded
Obligations; and
WHEREAS, upon issuance of the refunding bonds herein authorized and the deposit of
funds referred to above,the Refunded Obligations shall no longer be regarded as being outstanding,
except for the purpose of being paid pursuant to such deposits, and the pledges, liens, trusts and all
other covenants, provisions, terms and conditions of the ordinances authorizing the issuance of the
Refunded Obligations shall be discharged,terminated and defeased;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
1. Consideration. The matters and facts contained in the preamble to this Ordinance
are hereby found to be true and correct, and it is hereby found and determined that issuance of the
refunding bonds described herein will benefit the City by providing a savings in debt service equal
to a net present value of $ and a gross debt service savings equal to
$ , and that such benefit is sufficient consideration for the refunding of the
Refunded Obligations.
2. Definitions. Throughout this Ordinance, the following terms and expressions as
used herein shall have the meanings set forth below:
The term 'Bonds" or "Series 2004 Bonds" shall mean The City of Beaumont, Texas,
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2004 authorized in this Ordinance, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise.
The term"City" shall mean The City of Beaumont, Texas.
The term"Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The term "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York, New York, or
any successor securities depository.
The term "DTC Participant" shall mean brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies,
clearing corporations, and certain other organizations on whose behalf DTC was created to hold
securities to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions among DTC
Participants.
The term "Insurer" shall mean , the issuer of the Municipal
Bond Guaranty Insurance Policy.
The term "Interest and Sinking Fund" shall mean the interest and sinking fund established
by the City pursuant to Section 17 of this Ordinance.
The term "Interest Payment Date", when used in connection with any Bond, shall mean
March 1,2005, and each September 1 and March 1 thereafter until maturity of such Bond.
The term "Municipal Bond Guaranty Insurance Policy" shall mean the municipal bond
guaranty insurance policy issued by the Insurer insuring the payment when due of the principal of
and interest on the Bonds as provided therein.
The term "Ordinance" as used herein and in the Bonds shall mean this ordinance
-2-
authorizing the Bonds.
The term "Owner" shall mean any person or entity who shall be the registered owner of any
outstanding Bonds.
The term "Paying Agent" shall mean the Registrar.
The term "Record Date" shall mean, for any Interest Payment Date, the fifteenth (15th)
calendar day of the month next preceding each Interest Payment Date.
The term "Refunded Obligations" shall mean a portion of the City's Refunding Bonds,
Series 1996, maturing on March 1 in the years 2008 through 2010 in the principal amounts of
$790,000, $780,000 and $785,000, respectively, and a portion of the City's Combination Tax &
Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1996, maturing on March 1 in the years 2008 through
2014 in the principal amounts of $590,000, $610,000, $680,000, $725,000, $775,000, $825,000
and $850,000, respectively, and the City's Combination Tax &Revenue Certificates of Obligation,
Series 1995, maturing on March 1 in the years 2006 through 2014 in the principal amounts of
$500,000, $500,000, $500,000, $500,000, $500,000, $500,000, $500,000, $500,000 and $500,000,
respectively.
The term "Register" shall mean the books of registration kept by the Registrar in which are
maintained the names and addresses of and the principal amounts registered to each Owner.
The term "Registrar" shall mean Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Houston, Texas,
and its successors in that capacity.
The term "Report" shall mean the report of Grant Thornton, L.L.P., Certified Public
Accountants, certifying as to the mathematical accuracy of the program designed by RBC Dain
Rauscher,Inc., for the City with respect to the defeasance of the Refunded Obligations.
The term "SEC" shall mean the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and its
successors.
The term "Underwriters" shall mean
3. Authorization. The Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form,without coupons,
in the total authorized aggregate amount of TWELVE MILLION THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-
FIVE THOUSAND and NO/100 Dollars ($12,365,000.00) for the purpose of(i) refunding certain
of the outstanding Refunded Obligations, and(ii)paying all costs of issuance of the Bonds.
4. Designation, Tate and Interest Pay .nt lea . The Bonds shall be designated as the
"THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS, GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS,
SERIES 2004", and shall be dated November 1, 2004. The Bonds shall bear interest from the later
of November 1, 2004, or the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or
-3-
duly provided for, calculated on the basis of a 360 day year of twelve 30 day months, interest
payable on March 1, 2005, and semiannually thereafter on September 1 and March 1 of each year
until maturity or earlier redemption.
5. Initial Bends, Numbers and Denominations. The Bonds shall be issued bearing the
numbers, in the principal amounts, and bearing interest at the rates set forth in the following
schedule, and may be transferred and exchanged as set out in this Ordinance. The Bonds shall
mature, in accordance with this Ordinance, on March 1 in each of the years and in the amounts set
out in such schedule. Bonds delivered in transfer of or in exchange for other Bonds shall be
numbered in order of their authentication by the Registrar, shall be in the denomination of$5,000
or integral multiples thereof, and shall mature on the same date and bear interest at the same rate as
the Bond or Bonds in lieu of which they are delivered.
Bond Year of Principal Interest
Number Maturity Amount mate
R-1 2006 $ 445,000 %
R-2 2007 $ 430,000 %
R-3 2008 $2,065,000 %
R-4 2009 $2,030,000 %
R-5 2010 $2,070,000 %
R-6 2010 $1,295,000 %
R-7 2011 $1,325,000 %
R-8 2012 $1,325,000 %
R-9 2013 $1,350,000 %
R-10 2014 $1,355,000 %
The Bonds shall not be subject to redemption prior to their scheduled maturities.
6. Execution of Bends; Seal. The Bonds shall be signed by the Mayor of the City and
countersigned by the City Clerk of the City, by their manual, lithographed, or facsimile signatures,
and the official seal of the City shall be impressed or placed in facsimile thereon. Such facsimile
signatures on the Bonds shall have the same effect as if each of the Bonds had been signed
manually and in person by each of said officers, and such facsimile seal on the Bonds shall have the
same effect as if the official seal of the City had been manually impressed upon each of the Bonds.
If any officer of the City whose manual or facsimile signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease
to be such officer before the authentication of such Bonds or before the delivery of such Bonds,
such manual or facsimile signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes as if
such officer had remained in such office.
7. Annr_ o Attorney General- Registration by Comptroller. The Bonds to be
initially issued shall be delivered to the Attorney General of Texas for approval and shall be
registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas. The manually executed
-4-
registration certificate of the Comptroller of Public Accounts substantially in the form provided in
Section 15 of this Ordinance shall be attached or affixed to the Bonds to be initially issued.
8. Authentication. Except for the Bonds to be initially issued, which need not be
authenticated by the Registrar, only such Bonds which bear thereon a certificate of authentication,
substantially in the form provided in Section 15 of this Ordinance, manually executed by an
authorized officer of the Registrar, shall be entitled to the benefits of this Ordinance or shall be
valid or obligatory for any purpose. Such duly executed certificates of authentication shall be
conclusive evidence that the Bonds so authenticated were delivered by the Registrar hereunder.
9. Payment of Principal and Interest. The Registrar is hereby appointed as the paying
agent for the Bonds. The principal of the Bonds shall be payable, without exchange or collection
charges, in any coin or currency of the United States of America which, on the date of payment, is
legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America, upon their presentation and
surrender as they become due and payable, at the principal corporate trust office of the Registrar.
The interest on each Bond shall be payable by check payable on the Interest Payment Date, mailed
by the Registrar on or before each Interest Payment Date to the Owner of record as of the Record
Date, to the address of such Owner as shown on the Register. At the request of the registered
holder of $1,000,000 or more in aggregate principal amount of Bonds, the Registrar shall pay
interest on such Bonds by wire transfer in immediately available funds to the account designated by
such holder to the Registrar in writing at least 5 days before the Record Date for such payment.
10. Qwners ; i Tnclaimed Prin inal and Interest. The City, the Registrar and any other
person may treat the person in whose name any Bond is registered as the absolute owner of such
Bond for the purpose of making and receiving payment of the principal thereof and for the further
purpose of making and receiving payment of the interest thereon, and for all other purposes,
whether or not such Bond is overdue, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be bound by any
notice or knowledge to the contrary. All payments made to the person deemed to be the Owner of
any Bond in accordance with this Section 10 shall be valid and effectual and shall discharge the
liability of the City and the Registrar upon such Bond to the extent of the sums paid.
Amounts held by the Registrar which represent principal of and interest on the Bonds
remaining unclaimed by the Owner after the expiration of 3 years from the date such amounts have
become due and payable shall be reported and disposed of by the Registrar in accordance with the
provisions of Texas law, including to the extent applicable, Title 6 of the Texas Property Code, as
amended.
11. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. So long as any Bonds remain outstanding,the
Registrar shall keep the Register at its principal corporate trust office in which, subject to such
reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the Registrar shall provide for the registration and
transfer of Bonds in accordance with the terms of this Ordinance.
Each Bond shall be transferable only upon the presentation and surrender thereof at the
-5-
principal corporate trust office of the Registrar, duly endorsed for transfer, or accompanied by an
assignment duly executed by the registered Owner or his authorized representative in form
satisfactory to the Registrar. Upon due presentation of any Bond for transfer, the Registrar shall
authenticate and deliver in exchange therefor, within three business days after such presentation, a
new Bond or Bonds, registered in the name of the transferee or transferees, in authorized
denominations and of the same maturity and aggregate principal amount and bearing interest at the
same rate as the Bond or Bonds so presented.
All Bonds shall be exchangeable upon presentation and surrender thereof at the principal
corporate trust office of the Registrar for a Bond or Bonds of the same maturity and interest rate and
in any authorized denomination, in an aggregate principal amount equal to the unpaid principal
amount of the Bond or Bonds presented for exchange. The Registrar shall be and is hereby
authorized to authenticate and deliver exchange Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 11. Each Bond delivered in accordance with this Section 11 shall be entitled to the benefits
and security of this Ordinance to the same extent as the Bond or Bonds in lieu of which such Bond
is delivered.
The City or the Registrar may require the Owner of any Bond to pay a sum sufficient to
cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with the transfer or
exchange of such Bond. Any fee or charge of the Registrar for such transfer or exchange shall be
paid by the City.
12. Cancellation of Bonds. All Bonds paid in accordance with this Ordinance, and all
Bonds in lieu of which exchange Bonds or replacement Bonds are authenticated and delivered in
accordance herewith, shall be cancelled and destroyed upon the making of proper records regarding
such payment. The Registrar shall furnish the City with appropriate certificates of destruction of
such Bonds.
13. Mutilated, Lost or Stolen Banda. Upon the presentation and surrender to the
Registrar of a mutilated Bond, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver in exchange therefor a
replacement Bond of like maturity, interest rate and principal amount, bearing a number not
contemporaneously outstanding. The City or the Registrar may require the Owner of such Bond to
pay a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in
connection therewith and any other expenses connected therewith, including the fees and expenses
of the Registrar.
If any Bond is lost, apparently destroyed, or wrongfully taken, the City, pursuant to the
applicable laws of the State of Texas and in the absence of notice or knowledge that such Bond has
been acquired by a bona fide purchaser, shall execute and the Registrar shall authenticate and
deliver a replacement Bond of like maturity, interest rate and principal amount, bearing a number
not contemporaneously outstanding,provided that the Owner thereof shall have:
(1) furnished to the City and the Registrar satisfactory evidence of the
-6-
ownership of and the circumstances of the loss, destruction or theft of such Bond;
(2) furnished such security or indemnity as may be required by the
Registrar and the City to save them harmless;
(3) paid all expenses and charges in connection therewith, including, but not
limited to, printing costs, legal fees, fees of the Registrar and any tax or other governmental
charge that may be imposed; and
(4) met any other reasonable requirements of the City and the Registrar.
If, after the delivery of such replacement Bond, a bona fide purchaser of the original Bond in lieu of
which such replacement Bond was issued presents for payment such original Bond,the City and the
Registrar shall be entitled to recover such replacement Bond from the person to whom it was
delivered or any person taking therefrom, except a bona fide purchaser, and shall be entitled to
recover upon the security or indemnity provided therefor to the extent of any loss, damage, cost or
expense incurred by the City or the Registrar in connection therewith.
If any such mutilated, lost, apparently destroyed or wrongfully taken Bond has become or is
about to become due and payable, the City in its discretion may, instead of issuing a replacement
Bond, authorize the Registrar to pay such Bond.
Each replacement Bond delivered in accordance with this Section 13 shall be entitled to the
benefits and security of this Ordinance to the same extent as the Bond or Bonds in lieu of which
such replacement Bond is delivered.
14. Special Election for Uncertificated Bonds. Notwithstanding any other provision
hereof, upon initial issuance of the Bonds but at the sole election of the Underwriters, the
ownership of the Bonds shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, and
except as otherwise provided in this Section, all of the outstanding Bonds shall be registered in the
name of Cede &Co., as nominee of DTC. The definitive Bonds shall be initially issued in the form
of a single separate certificate for each of the maturities thereof. If the purchaser shall elect to
invoke the provisions of this Section, then the following provisions shall take effect with respect to
the Bonds.
With respect to Bonds registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City
and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or to any person
on behalf of whom such a DTC Participant holds an interest in the Bonds. Without limiting the
immediately preceding sentence, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or
obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any DTC
Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC
Participant or any other person, other than an Owner of a Bond, as shown on the Register, of any
notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any
-7-
DTC Participant or any other person, other than an Owner of a Bond, as shown in the Register, of
any amount with respect to principal of,premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. Notwithstanding
any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, the City and the Registrar shall be entitled to
treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the Register as the absolute
Owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on
the Bonds, for the purpose of all matters with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering
transfers with respect to such Bond, and for all other purposes whatsoever. The Registrar shall pay
all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of the
respective Owners, as shown in the Register as provided in this Ordinance, or their respective
attorneys duly authorized in writing, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully
satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of,premium, if any,
and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than an Owner
as shown in the Register, shall receive a Bond certificate evidencing the obligation of the City to
make payments of amounts due pursuant to this Ordinance. Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar
of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of
Cede&Co.,the word"Cede&Co." in this Ordinance shall refer to such new nominee of DTC.
In the event that the City or the Registrar determines that DTC is incapable of discharging
its responsibilities described herein and in the Letter of Representations of the City to DTC, and
that it is in the best interest of the beneficial Owners of the Bonds that they be able to obtain
certificated Bonds, or if DTC Participants owning at least 50% of the Bonds outstanding based on
current records of the DTC determine that continuation of the system of book-entry transfers
through the DTC (or a successor securities depository) is not in the best interest of the beneficial
Owners of the Bonds, or in the event DTC discontinues the services described herein, the City or
the Registrar shall (i) appoint a successor securities depository, qualified to act as such under
Section 17(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and notify DTC of the
appointment of such successor securities depository and transfer one or more separate Bonds to
such successor securities depository or (ii) notify DTC of the availability through DTC of Bonds
and transfer one or more separate Bonds to DTC Participants having Bonds credited to their DTC
accounts. In such event, the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the Register
in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC,but may be registered in the name of the successor
securities depository, or its nominee, or in whatever name or names Bondholders transferring or
exchanging Bonds shall designate,in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance to the contrary, so long as any Bonds
are registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to
principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and all notices with respect to the Bonds,
shall be made and given,respectively, in the manner provided in the Letter of Representations from
the City to DTC.
15. Form. (a) The Bonds shall be in substantially the following form,including
the form of Registrar's Certificate of Authentication,the form of Assignment,the form of Statement
of Insurance, and the form of Registration Statement of the Comptroller of Public Accounts, with
-8-
such additions, deletions and variations as may be necessary or desirable and permitted by this
Ordinance:
(Face of Bond)
United States of America
State of Texas
County of Jefferson
NUMBER DENOMINATION
R- $
REGISTERED REGISTERED
THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS
General Obligation Refunding Bond
Series 2004
INTF,REST RATE: MATT TRTTY DATE: DATED DATE: Cl JSTP:
November 1,2004
REGISTERED OWNER:
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS
The City of Beaumont, in the County of Jefferson, State of Texas (the "City"), promises to
pay to the Registered Owner identified above, or registered assigns, on the date specified above,
upon presentation and surrender of this bond at the principal corporate trust office of Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, Houston, Texas (the "Registrar"), the principal amount identified
above, payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on the date of
payment of such principal is legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America,
and to pay interest thereon at the rate shown above, calculated on the basis of a 360 day year of
twelve 30 day months, from the later of November 1,2004, or the most recent interest payment date
to which interest has been paid or duly provided for. Interest on this bond shall be paid by check
payable on September 1 and March 1, beginning on March 1, 2005, mailed to the registered owner
of record as of the previous August 15 and February 15 as shown on the books of registration kept
by the Registrar. At the request of the registered holder of $1,000,000 or more in aggregate
principal amount of Bonds, the Registrar shall pay interest on such Bonds by wire transfer in
immediately available funds to the account designated by such holder to the Registrar in writing at
least 5 days before the Record Date for such payment.
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE FURTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS BOND
SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, WHICH PROVISIONS SHALL HAVE THE SAME
-9-
FORCE AND EFFECT AS IF SET FORTH AT THIS PLACE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Bond has been signed with the manual or facsimile
signature of the Mayor of the City and countersigned with the manual or facsimile signature of the
City Clerk of the City, and the official seal of the City has been duly impressed, or placed in
facsimile, on this Bond.
(AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE) THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,TEXAS
Mayor
(SEAL)
City Clerk
(Back Panel of Bond)
THIS BOND is one of a duly authorized issue of Bonds, aggregating $12,365,000 (the
"Bonds"), issued pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council on November , 2004
(the "Ordinance") for the purpose of refunding prior to maturity(i)a portion of the City's Refunding
Bonds, Series 1996, maturing on March 1 in the years 2008 through 2010, (ii) a portion of the
City's Combination Tax & Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2004, maturing on March 1
in the years 2008 through 2014 and (ii) the City's Combination Tax & Revenue Certificates of
Obligation, Series 1995,maturing on March 1 in the years 2006 through 2014.
THE BONDS are not subject to redemption prior to maturity.
THIS BOND is transferable only upon presentation and surrender at the principal corporate
trust office of the Registrar, duly endorsed for transfer or accompanied by an assignment duly
executed by the registered owner or his authorized representative, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Ordinance.
THE BONDS are exchangeable at the principal corporate trust office of the Registrar for
bonds in the principal amount of$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Ordinance.
THIS BOND shall not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any benefit
under the Ordinance unless this Bond either(i) is registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts
of the State of Texas by registration certificate endorsed hereon or (ii) is authenticated by the
Registrar by due execution of the authentication certificate endorsed hereon.
-10-
IT IS HEREBY certified, recited and covenanted that this Bond has been duly and validly
issued and delivered; that all acts, conditions and things required or proper to be performed, to exist
and to be done precedent to or in the issuance and delivery of this Bond have been performed, exist
and have been done in accordance with law; and that annual ad valorem taxes within the limits
prescribed by law sufficient to provide for the payment of the interest on and principal of this Bond,
as such interest comes due and such principal matures, have been levied and ordered to be levied
against all taxable property in the City and have been pledged irrevocably for such payment.
(b) Bonds No. R-1 through R-10 shall be registered by the Comptroller of Public
Accounts of the State of Texas, as provided by law. The registration certificate of the Comptroller
of Public Accounts shall be printed on Bonds R-1 through R-10 and shall be in substantially the
following form:
COMPTROLLER'S REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE: REGISTER NO.
I hereby certify that this bond has been examined, certified as to validity, and approved by
the Attorney General of the State of Texas, and that this bond has been registered by the
Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas.
WITNESS MY SIGNATURE AND SEAL this ,2004.
XXXXXXXXXXX
Comptroller of Public Accounts
of the State of Texas
(SEAL)
(c) Except for Bond Numbers R-1 through R-10, the following form of authentication
certificate shall be printed on each of the Bonds:
AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE
This bond is one of the bonds
described in and delivered pursuant
to the within-mentioned Ordinance.
Wells Fargo Bank,National Association,Registrar
By
Authorized Signature
Date of Authentication:
-11-
(d) The following form of assignment shall be printed on each of the Bonds:
ASSIGNMENT
For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns, and transfers unto
the within bond and hereby irrevocably constitutes
and appoints attorney to transfer said bond on the
books kept for registration thereof,with full power of substitution in the premises.
DATED:
Signature Guaranteed:
Registered Owner
NOTICE: The signature
above must correspond to
the name of the registered
NOTICE: Signature must be owner as shown on the face
guaranteed by a member firm of this Bond in every
of the New York Stock Exchange particular,without any
or a commercial bank or trust alteration, enlargement or
company. change whatsoever.
(e) The following statement of insurance shall be printed on each of the Bonds:
STATEMENT OF INSURANCE
16. Legal (binions; CI TSTP. The approving opinion of Orgain, Bell & Tucker, L.L.P.,
Beaumont, Texas, Bond Counsel, and CUSIP Numbers may be printed on the Bonds, but errors or
omissions in the printing of such opinions or such numbers shall have no effect on the validity of
the Bonds.
17. Interest and Sinking Fund; T wy, Assessment and Collection of Taxes. There is
hereby established a separate fund of the City to be known as the "Series 2004 General Obligation
Refunding Bonds Interest and Sinking Fund" which shall be kept separate and apart from all other
funds of the City. The proceeds from all taxes levied, assessed and collected for and on account of
the Bonds authorized by this Ordinance shall be deposited, as collected, in the Interest and Sinking
Fund. While the Bonds or any part of the principal thereof or interest thereon remain outstanding
and unpaid, there is hereby levied and there shall be annually assessed and collected in due time,
form and manner, and at the same time other City taxes are assessed, levied and collected, in each
-12-
year, beginning with the current year, a continuing direct annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable
property in said City sufficient to pay the current interest on said Bonds as the same becomes due,
and to create and provide a sinking fund of not less than two percent (2%) of the original principal
amount of the Bonds or of not less than the amount required to pay each installment of the principal
of said Bonds as the same matures, whichever is greater, full allowance being made for
delinquencies and costs of collection, and said taxes when collected shall be applied to the payment
of the interest on and principal of said Bonds and to no other purpose. In addition, interest accrued
from the date of the Bonds until their delivery and premium, if any, is to be deposited in such fund.
To pay the interest coming due on the Bonds on March 1, 2005, and the interest coming due on
September 1, 2005, there is hereby appropriated from current funds on hand, which are certified to
be on hand and available for such purpose, an amount sufficient to pay such interest, and such
amount shall be used for no other purpose.
18. Further Proceedings. After the Bonds to be initially issued shall have been
executed, it shall be the duty of the Mayor of the City to deliver the Bonds to be initially issued and
all pertinent records and proceedings to the Attorney General of the State of Texas, for examination
and approval by the Attorney General. After the Bonds to be initially issued shall have been
approved by the Attorney General, they shall be delivered to the Comptroller of Public Accounts of
the State of Texas for registration. Upon registration of the Bonds to be initially issued, the
Comptroller of Public Accounts (or a deputy lawfully designated in writing to act for the
Comptroller) shall manually sign the Comptroller's Registration Certificate prescribed herein to be
printed and endorsed on the Bonds to be initially issued, and the seal of said Comptroller shall be
impressed, or placed in facsimile,thereon.
19. Sale of Bonds and Bond Insurance. The Bonds are hereby sold and shall be
delivered to the Underwriters at a price of $ , representing the principal
amount of Bonds of$ ,plus a premium of$ , and less an
underwriter's discount of$ ,plus accrued interest on the Bonds, calculated on
the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months from November 1, 2004, to the date of
Closing, in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Contract presented to and hereby approved
by the City Council, which price and terms are hereby found and determined to be the most
advantageous reasonably obtainable by the City. The Mayor and other appropriate officials of the
City are hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things necessary or desirable to satisfy the
conditions set out herein and to provide for the issuance and delivery of the Bonds. The purchase
of and payment of the premium for the Municipal Bond Guaranty Insurance Policy in accordance
with the terms of the commitment for such insurance presented to the City Council are hereby
approved and authorized. All officials and representatives of the City are authorized and directed to
execute such documents and to do any and all things necessary, desirable or appropriate to obtain
the Municipal Bond Guaranty Insurance Policy, and the printing on the Bonds covered by the
Municipal Bond Guaranty Insurance Policy of an appropriate legend regarding such insurance is
hereby approved and authorized.
-13-
20. Tax Exemption. The City intends that the interest on the Bonds shall be
excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes pursuant to
Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the
"Code") and all applicable temporary, proposed and final regulations (the "Regulations") and
procedures promulgated thereunder and applicable to the Bonds. For this purpose, the City
covenants that it will monitor and control the receipt, investment, expenditure and use of all
gross proceeds of the Bonds and take or omit to take such other and further actions as may be
required by Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code and the Regulations to cause the
interest on the Bonds to be and remain excludable from the gross income, as defined in Section
61 of the Code, of the owners of the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the City shall comply with each of the following covenants:
(a) The City will use all of the proceeds of the Bonds to (i) acquire non-
callable obligations of the United States of America(the "Escrowed Securities") sufficient to pay
the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Refunded Obligations and (ii)to pay the
costs of issuing the Bonds except for amounts, if any, described in the Report (as defined in the
Escrow Agreement) as the rounding amount and the ending cash balance in the Escrow Fund (as
defined in the Escrow Agreement).
(b) The City will not directly or indirectly take any action or omit to take any
action, which action or omission would cause the Bonds or the Refunded Obligations to
constitute "private activity bonds"within the meaning of Section 141(a) of the Code.
(c) Principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid solely from ad valorem
taxes collected by the City, investment earnings on such collections, and as available,proceeds of
the Bonds.
(d) Based upon all facts and estimates now known or reasonably expected to
be in existence on the date the Bonds are delivered, the City reasonably expects that the proceeds
of the Bonds and the Refunded Obligations (to the extent any of such proceeds remain
unexpended) will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds or the Refunded
Obligations or any portion thereof to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of
the Code.
(e) At all times while the Bonds are outstanding, the City will identify and
properly account for all amounts constituting gross proceeds of the Bonds in accordance with the
Regulations. The City will monitor the yield on the investments of the proceeds of the Bonds
and, to the extent required by the Code and the Regulations, will restrict the yield on such
investments to a yield which is not materially higher than the yield on the Bonds. To the extent
necessary to prevent the Bonds from constituting "arbitrage bonds," the City will make such
payments as are necessary to cause the yield on all yield-restricted nonpurpose investments
allocable to the Bonds to be less than the yield that is materially higher than the yield on the
Bonds.
-14-
(f) The City will not take any action or knowingly omit to take any action, if
taken or omitted, would cause the Bonds to be treated as "federally guaranteed" obligations for
purposes of Section 149(b) of the Code.
(g) The City represents that not more than fifty percent (50%) of the proceeds
of any new money portion of the Bonds or any new money issue refunded by, the Refunded
Obligations was invested in nonpurpose investments (as defined in Section 148(f)(b)(A) of the
Code) having a substantially guaranteed yield for four years or more within the meaning of
Section 149(g)(3)(A)(ii) of the Code, and the City reasonably expected at the time each issue of
the Refunded Obligations was issued that at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the spendable
proceeds of the Bonds or the Refunded Obligations would be used to carry out the governmental
purpose of such Bonds within the corresponding three-year period beginning on the respective
dates of the Bonds or the Refunded Obligations.
(h) The City will take all necessary steps to comply with the requirement that
certain amounts earned by the City on the investment of the gross proceeds of the Bonds, if any,
be rebated to the federal government. Specifically,the City will (i)maintain records regarding the
receipt, investment and expenditure of the gross proceeds of the Bonds as may be required to
calculate such excess arbitrage profits separately from records of amounts on deposit in the funds
and accounts of the City allocable to other obligations of the City or moneys which do not
represent gross proceeds of any obligations of the City and retain such records for at least six
years after the day on which the last outstanding Bond is discharged, (ii) account for all gross
proceeds under a reasonable, consistently applied method of accounting, not employed as an
artifice or device to avoid, in whole or in part, the requirements of Section 148 of the Code,
including any specified method of accounting required by applicable Regulations to be used for
all or a portion of the gross proceeds, (iii) calculate, at such times as are required by applicable
Regulations, the amount of excess arbitrage profits, if any, earned from the investment of the
gross proceeds of the Bonds and (iv) timely pay, as required by applicable Regulations, all
amounts required to be rebated to the federal government. In addition, the City will exercise
reasonable diligence to assure that no errors are made in the calculations required by the
preceding sentence and, if such an error is made, to discover and promptly correct such error
within a reasonable amount of time thereafter, including payment to the federal government of
any delinquent amounts owed to it, including interest thereon and penalty.
(i) The City will not indirectly pay any amount otherwise payable to the
federal government pursuant to the foregoing requirements to any person other than the federal
government by entering into any investment arrangement with respect to the gross proceeds of
the Bonds that might result in a reduction in the amount required to be paid to the federal
government because such arrangement results in smaller profit or a larger loss than would have
resulted if such arrangement had been at arm's length and had the yield on the issue not been
relevant to either party.
-15-
0) The City will timely file or cause to be filed with the Secretary of the
Treasury of the United States the information required by Section 149(e) of the Code with
respect to the Bonds on such form and in such place as the Secretary may prescribe.
(k) The City will not issue or use the Bonds as part of an "abusive arbitrage
device" (as defined in Section 1.148-10(a) of the Regulations). Without limiting the foregoing,
the Bonds are not and will not be a part of a transaction or series of transactions that attempts
to circumvent the provisions of Section 148 of the Code and the Regulations, by (i) enabling
the City to exploit the difference between tax-exempt and taxable interest rates to gain a
material financial advantage, or (ii) increasing the burden on the market for tax-exempt
obligations.
(1) Proper officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the
Bonds are hereby directed to make, execute and deliver certifications as to facts, estimates or
circumstances in existence as of the Issue Date and stating whether there are facts, estimates or
circumstances that would materially change the City's expectations. On or after the Issue Date,
the City will take such actions as are necessary and appropriate to assure the continuous
accuracy of the representations contained in such certificates.
(m) The covenants and representations made or required by this Section are
for the benefit of the Bond holders and any subsequent Bond holder, and may be relied upon
by the Bondholder and any subsequent Bondholder and bond counsel to the City.
(n) In complying with the foregoing covenants, the City may rely upon an
unqualified opinion issued to the City by nationally recognized bond counsel that any action by
the City or reliance upon any interpretation of the Code or Regulations contained in such opinion
will not cause interest on the Bonds to be includable in gross income for federal income tax
purposes under existing law.
(o) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance, the City's
representations and obligations under the covenants and provisions of this Section shall survive
the defeasance and discharge of the Bonds for as long as such matters are relevant to the
exclusion of interest on the Bonds from the gross income of the owners for federal income tax
purposes.
Section 21. Application of Proceeds. The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds in the
amount of$ shall,promptly upon receipt by the City,be applied as follows:
(a) Accrued interest shall be deposited into the Interest and Sinking Fund for the Bonds;
(b) To establish the escrow fund to refund the Refunded Obligations as provided in
Section 24 below, $ from the sale of the Bonds shall be deposited with the
Escrow Agent pursuant to Section 24 below.
-16-
(c) $ from the sale of the Bonds shall be used to pay the costs of
issuing the Bonds, including the premium of $ for the Municipal Bond
Guaranty Insurance Policy,not later than 90 days after such issuance; and
(d) The sum of $ from the sale of the Bonds shall be used as a
rounding amount and shall be deposited in the Interest and Sinking Fund for the Bonds; and
(e) Any proceeds from the Bonds remaining after making all such deposits and
payments shall be deposited into the Interest and Sinking Fund.
22. Transfer of Money in Interest and SinkinR Funds Maintained for the Refiinded
Obligations. On the date of delivery of the Bonds, any amounts contained in the Interest and
Sinking Funds for the Refunded Obligations shall be transferred to the Interest and Sinking Fund
for the Bonds and shall be applied as herein provided.
23. Rec3e mntion of R .fimded Obligation-,. The City hereby irrevocably calls the
following bonds of the City for redemption prior to maturity on the date set forth below, and
authorizes and directs notice of such redemption to be given as provided in substantially the form
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" (with such changes to this form as any official of the City may
approve):
SEE SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE.
24. Escrow Agreement. The discharge and defeasance of the Refunded Obligations
shall be effectuated pursuant to the terms and provisions of an Escrow Agreement to be entered into
by and between the City and JPMorgan Chase Bank, Dallas, Texas, as Escrow Agent, which shall
be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "C", the terms and provisions of which are
hereby approved, subject to such insertions, additions and modifications as shall be necessary(a)to
carry out the program which has been designed for the City by RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., and which
shall be certified as to mathematical accuracy by Grant Thornton, L.L.P., in the Report, (b) to
maximize the City's present value savings and minimize the City's costs of refunding, (c)to comply
with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the refunding of the Refunded Obligations and
(d)to carry out the other intents and purposes of this Ordinance, and the Mayor is hereby authorized
to execute and deliver the Escrow Agreement on behalf of the City in multiple counterparts and the
City Clerk or an Assistant City Clerk is hereby authorized to attest thereto and affix the City's seal.
25. Source of Funds i TS d in R fiinding. No money of the City other than proceeds of
the Bonds shall be used to refund the Refunded Obligations.
-17-
26. Purchase of Escrowed S . .uriti . To assure the purchase of the Escrowed Securities
as described in the Report and in the Escrow Agreement,the Mayor,the City's Finance Officer, and
the Escrow Agent are hereby authorized to subscribe for, agree to purchase, and purchase such
Escrowed Securities in such amounts and maturities and bearing interest at such rates as may be
provided for in the Report, and to execute any and all subscriptions, purchase agreements,
commitments, letters of authorization and other documents necessary to effectuate the foregoing,
and any actions heretofore taken for such purpose are hereby ratified and approved.
27. Open Meeting. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at
which this Ordinance was adopted was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and
purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code
Annotated,Vernon's 1994, as amended.
28. Official Statement. The Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement
prepared in the initial offering and sale of the Bonds have been and are hereby authorized, approved
and ratified as to form and content. The use of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official
Statement in the reoffering of the Bonds by the Underwriters is hereby approved, authorized and
ratified. The proper officials of the City are hereby authorized to execute and deliver a certificate
pertaining to the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement as prescribed therein,
dated as of the date of payment for and delivery of the Bonds.
29. Registrar. The Registrar, by undertaking the performance of the duties of the
Registrar and in consideration of the payment of fees or deposits of money pursuant to this
Ordinance and a Paying Agent/Registrar's Agreement, accepts and agrees to abide by the terms of
this Ordinance and such Agreement. The City hereby approves the form of the Paying
Agent/Registrar's Agreement presented to the City Council and hereby authorizes the Mayor or any
other official of the City to execute such agreement on behalf of the City, with such changes and
revisions thereto as may be approved by the official executing such agreement.
The City covenants that at all times while any Bonds are outstanding, it will provide a bank,
trust company, financial institution or other entity duly qualified and authorized to act as Registrar
for the Bonds. The City reserves the right to replace the Registrar or its successor at any time on
not less than sixty(60) days' written notice to the Registrar, so long as any such notice is effective
not less than sixty (60) days prior to the next succeeding principal or interest payment date on the
Bonds. If the Registrar is replaced by the City, the new Registrar shall accept the previous
Registrar's records and act in the same capacity as the previous Registrar, and the new Registrar
shall notify each Owner, by United States Mail, first class postage prepaid, of such change and of
the address of the new Registrar. Any successor Registrar shall be either a national or state banking
institution and a corporation or association organized and doing business under the laws of the
United States of America or any State authorized under such laws to exercise trust powers and
subject to supervision or examination by Federal or State authority. Each Registrar hereunder, by
acting in that capacity, shall be deemed to have agreed to the provisions of this Section.
-18-
30. Related Matters. To satisfy in a timely manner all of the City's obligations under
this Ordinance, the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tem, the City Manager,the City Clerk, or Assistant City
Clerk, and all other appropriate officers and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to
take all other actions that are reasonably necessary to provide for issuance of the Bonds, including,
without limitation, executing and delivering on behalf of the City all certificates, consents,receipts,
requests and other documents as may be reasonably necessary to satisfy the City's obligations under
this Ordinance and to direct the application of funds of the City consistent with the provisions
hereof.
31. No Personal Liability. No recourse shall be had for payment of the principal of or
premium, if any, or interest on any Bonds, or for any claim based thereon, or on this Ordinance,
against any official or employee of the City or any person executing any Bonds.
32. Sever. If any Section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Ordinance shall
for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such
Section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this
Ordinance.
33. RM eater. All orders, resolutions, and ordinances, and parts thereof inconsistent
herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency.
34. Additional Obligation-,- The City undertakes and agrees for the benefit of the
holders of the Bonds to provide directly, on or before six months after the end of the City's fiscal
year,which fiscal year presently ends on September 30:
a. to each nationally recognized municipal securities information repository and to the
appropriate state information depository, if any, annual financial information(which
may be unaudited) and operating data regarding the City for fiscal years ending on
or after January 1, 2004 which annual financial information and operating data shall
be of the type included in the following listed sections contained in the Final
Official Statement:
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CITY TAX DEBT(except for"Estimated Overlapping Debt")
TAX DATA
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
INVESTMENT AUTHORITY AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE
CITY—Current Investments
-19-
Appendix B
b. to each nationally recognized municipal securities information repository and to the
appropriate state information depository, if any, audited financial statements for the
City for fiscal years ending on or after January 1, 2004, when available, if the City
commissions an audit and it is completed by the required time; provided that if
audited statements are not commissioned or are not available by the required time,
the City will provide unaudited statements when and if they become available;
C. in a timely manner, to each nationally recognized municipal securities information
repository or to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and to the appropriate
state information depository, if any, notice of any of the following events with
respect to the Bonds, if material within the meaning of the federal securities laws to
a decision to purchase or sell Bonds:
i. Principal and interest payment delinquencies;
ii. Non-payment related defaults;
iii. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves
reflecting financial difficulties;
iv. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements
reflecting financial difficulties;
V. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers,
or their failure to perform;
vi. Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the
tax-exempt status of the Bonds;
vii. Modifications to rights of Bondholders;
viii. Bond calls;
ix. Defeasances;
X. Release, substitution or sale of property
securing repayment of the securities;
xi. Rating changes; and
d. in a timely manner, to each nationally recognized municipal securities information
repository or to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and to the appropriate
state information depository, if any, notice of a failure of the City to provide
required annual financial information and operating data, on or before six months
after the end of the City's fiscal year.
These undertakings and agreements are subject to appropriation of necessary funds and to
applicable legal restrictions,if any.
The accounting principles pursuant to which the City's financial statements are currently
prepared are generally accepted accounting principles set out by the Government Accounting
-20-
Standards Board, and, subject to changes in applicable law or regulation, such principles will be
applied in the future.
If the City changes its fiscal year, it will notify each nationally recognized municipal
securities information repository and the appropriate state information depository of the change
(and of the new fiscal year end) prior to the next date by which the City otherwise would be
required to provide annual financial information.
The City's obligation to update information and to provide notices of material events shall
be limited to the agreements herein. The City shall not be obligated to provide other information
that may be relevant or material to a complete presentation of its financial results of operations,
condition,prospects and shall not be obligated to update any information that is provided, except as
described herein. The City makes no representation or warranty concerning such information or
concerning its usefulness to a decision to invest in or sell Bonds at any future date. THE CITY
DISCLAIMS ANY CONTRACTUAL OR TORT LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES RESULTING IN
WHOLE OR IN PART FROM ANY BREACH, WHETHER NEGLIGENT OR WITHOUT
FAULT ON ITS PART, OF ITS CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT OR FROM ANY
STATEMENT MADE PURSUANT TO ITS AGREEMENT. HOLDERS OR BENEFICIAL
OWNERS OF BONDS MAY SEEK AS THEIR SOLE REMEDY A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO
COMPEL THE CITY TO COMPLY WITH ITS AGREEMENT. No default by the City with
respect to its continuing disclosure agreement shall constitute a breach of or default under this
Ordinance for purposes of any other provision of this Ordinance. Nothing in this paragraph is
intended or shall act to disclaim, waive, or otherwise limit the duties of the City under federal and
state securities laws.
The City may amend its continuing disclosure obligations and agreement in this Section 34
to adapt to changed circumstances that arise from a change in legal requirements, a change in law,
or a change in the identity, nature, status or type of operations of the City, if the agreement, as
amended, would have permitted the Underwriters to purchase or sell the Bonds in compliance with
SEC Rule 15c2-12, taking into account any amendments or interpretations of such rule to the date
of such amendment, as well as such changed circumstances, and either the holders of a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Bonds consent or any person unaffiliated with the
City (such as nationally recognized bond counsel) determines the amendment will not materially
impair the interests of the holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds. The City may also amend or
repeal the obligations and agreement in this Section 34 if the SEC amends or repeals the applicable
provisions of Rule 15c2-12 or a court of final jurisdiction determines that such provisions are
invalid, and the City may amend the agreement in its discretion in any other circumstance or
manner, but in either case only to the extent that its right to do so would not prevent the
Underwriters from lawfully purchasing or reselling the Bonds in the primary offering of the Bonds
in compliance with Rule 15c2-12. If the City amends its agreement, it must include with the next
financial information and operating data provided in accordance with its agreement an explanation,
in narrative form, of the reasons for the amendment and of the impact of any change in the type of
information and operating data so provided.
-21-
The City's continuing obligation to provide annual financial information and operating data
and notices of events will terminate if and when the City no longer remains an "obligated person"
(as such term is defined in SEC Rule 15c2-12)with respect to the Bonds.
-22-
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of November,2004.
Mayor
THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS
ATTEST:
City Clerk
THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,TEXAS
(CITY SEAL)
-23-
EXHIBIT"A"
SCHEDULE OF OBLIGATIONS TO BE REDEEMED
EXHIBIT "B"
FORM OF NOTICE OF REDEMPTION
EXHIBIT "C"
ESCROW AGREEMENT
2
November 2,2044
Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a Multiple Use Agreement with the Texas
Department of Transportation(TxDOT) for the future M.L. King Park statue site
:1~1 City of Beaumont
7eij-
1Council Agenda Item
�A ' L
T O: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 26, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Multiple Use
Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation(TxDOT)
for the future M.L. King Park statue site.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval of the execution of a Multiple Use Agreement with the
TxDOT for the future M.L. King Park statue site.
BACKGROUND
In 1996, the M.L. King Commission prepared a project nomination application for potential
funding of the M.L. King statue through TxDOT's Statewide Enhancement Program. Upon
review of the application by TxDOT, it was determined that the funding of the statue was not an
eligible project under the Statewide Enhancement Program. Although the project was not eligible,
the pedestals, marble wall and landscaping were installed by TxDOT.
The improvements constructed by TxDOT are located in the median north of the M.L. King
Parkway and Wall Street intersection. Since its construction, the marble wall has been hit by
vehicles and/or vandalized on several occasions. Additionally, if the statue was to be installed at
this location, it would not be easily accessible to the public. For these reasons, it was determined
it would be beneficial to relocate these improvements to another location along the parkway.
Several potential properties were reviewed and the location that was determined to be the most
aesthetically pleasing is located on the east side of M.L. King between College and Wall Streets.
This property is currently owned by TxDOT and is a portion of the M.L. King right-of-way.
The TxDOT will allow the use of this property by means of a multiple use agreement. The
Multiple Use Agreement, in substantial form, is enclosed.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Internal Service Director and Public Works Director.
TWMLKParkStatueSite.wpd
October 26,2004
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
(GSD-EPC)
Pagel of 10
MULTIPLE USE AGREEMENT
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
THIS AGREEMENT made by the State of Texas by and between the Texas Department of
Transportation, hereinafter referred to as"State", party of the first part, and
City of Beaumont , hereinafter called
City , party of the second part, is to become effective
when fully executed by both parties.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, on the day of , 20 , the governing
body for the City , entered
into Resolution/Ordinance No. hereinafter identified by
reference, authorizing the City 's participation in
this agreement with the State; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested the
State to permit the construction, maintenance and operation of a public
park on the highway
right of way, (General description of area) shown
graphically by the preliminary conceptual site plan in Exhibit"A"and being more specifically described by
metes and bounds of Exhibit"B", which are attached and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the State has indicated its willingness to approve the establishment of such facilities
and other uses conditioned that the
City will enter into
agreements with the State for the purpose of determining the respective responsibilities of the
City and the
State with reference thereto, and conditioned that such uses are in the public interest and will not damage
the highway facilities, impair safety, impede maintenance or in any way restrict the operation of the
highway facility, all as determined from engineering and traffic investigations conducted by the State.
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 2 of 10
AGREEMENT
NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and
agreements of the parties hereto to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it
is agreed as follows:
1. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
The City will prepare or provide for the
construction plans for the facility, and will provide for the construction work as required by said plans at
no cost to the State. Said plans shall include the design of the access control, necessary horizontal
and vertical clearances for highway structures, adequate landscape treatment, adequate detail to
ensure compliance with applicable structural design standards, sufficient traffic control provisions, and
general layout. They shall also delineate and define the construction responsibilities of both parties
hereto. Completed plans will be submitted to State for review and approval and when approved shall
be attached to the agreement and made a part thereof in all respects. Construction shall not
commence until plans have been approved by the State. Any future revisions or additions shall be
made after prior written approval of the State.
2. INSPECTION
Ingress and egress shall be allowed at all times to such facility for Federal Highway Administration
personnel and State Forces and equipment when highway maintenance operations are necessary,
and for inspection purposes; and upon request, all parking or other activities for periods required for
such operations will be prohibited.
3. PARKING REGULATIONS
Parking regulations shall be established limiting parking to single unit motor vehicles of size and
capacity no greater than prescribed for 11/2 ton trucks, such vehicles to conform in size and use to
governing laws. Parking shall be permitted only in marked spaces.
Parking shall be prohibited when a security threat, as determined by TxDOT, exists.
4. PROHIBITION/SIGNS
Regulations shall be established prohibiting the parking of vehicles transporting flammable or
explosive loads and prohibiting use of the area in any manner for peddling, advertising or other
purposes not in keeping with the objective of a public facility. The erection of signs other than those
required for proper use of the area will be prohibited. All signs shall be approved by the State prior to
the actual erection.
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 3 of 10
5. RESPONSIBILITIES
Maintenance and operation of the facility shall be entirely the responsibility of the
City . Such responsibility shall not be transferred,
assigned or conveyed to a third party without the advanced written approval of the State. Further,
such responsibility shall include picking up trash, mowing and otherwise keeping the facility in a clean
and sanitary condition, and surveillance by police patrol to eliminate the possible creation of a
nuisance or hazard to the public. Hazardous or unreasonably objectionable smoke,fumes,vapor or
odors shall not be permitted to rise above the grade line of the highway, nor shall the facility subject
the highway to hazardous or unreasonably objectionable dripping, droppings or discharge of any kind,
including rain or snow.
6. FEES
Any fees levied for use of the facilities in the area shall be nominal and no more than are sufficient to
defray the cost of construction, maintenance and operations thereof, and shall be subject to State
approval.
7. TERMINATION UPON NOTICE
This provision is expressly made subject to the rights herein granted to both parties to terminate this
agreement upon notice, and upon the exercise of any such right by either party, all obligations herein
to make improvements to said facility shall immediately cease and terminate.
8. MODIFICATION/TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
If in the sole judgment of the State it is found at any future time that traffic conditions have so
changed that the existence or use of the facility is impeding maintenance, damaging the highway
facility, impairing safety or that the facility is not being properly operated, that it constitutes a
nuisance, is abandoned, or if for any other reason it is the State's judgment that such facility is not in
the public interest, this agreement under which the facility was constructed may be : (1) modified if
corrective measures acceptable to both parties can be applied to eliminate the objectionable features
of the facility; or (2) terminated and the use of the area as proposed herein discontinued.
9. PROHIBITION OF STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE MATERIALS
All structures located or constructed within the area covered by the agreement shall be fire resistant.
The storage of flammable, explosive or hazardous materials is prohibited. Operations deemed to be
a potential fire hazard shall be subject to regulation by the State.
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 4 of 10
10. RESTORATION OF AREA
The City shall provide written notification to the State
that such facility will be discontinued for the purpose defined herein. The
City shall,within thirty(30) days from the date of said
notification, clear the area of all facilities that were its construction responsibility under this agreement
and restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the State.
11. PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS
It is understood that this agreement in no way modifies or supersedes the terms and provisions of any
existing agreements between the parties hereto.
12. INDEMNIFICATION
The City acknowledges that it is not an
agent, servant or employee of the State, and that it is responsible for its own acts and deeds and for
those of its agents or employees during the performance of contract work.
Neither party hereto intends to waive, relinquish, limit or condition its right to avoid any such liability
by claiming its governmental immunity.
When notified by the State to do so,the other party hereto shall within thirty (30) days from receipt of
the State's written notification pay the State for the full cost of repairing any damages to the highway
facility which may result from its construction, maintenance or operation of the facility, and shall
promptly reimburse the State for costs of construction and/or repair work made necessary by reason
of such damages.
Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as creating any liability in favor of any third party against
the State and the City . Additionally, this agreement shall not ever be
construed as relieving any third party from any liability against the State and the
City , but the
City shall become fully subrogated to the State and
shall be entitled to maintain any action over and against the third party which may be liable for having
caused the City to pay or disburse any sum of money
hereunder.
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 5 of 10
13. INSURANCE
The City shall provide necessary safeguards to
protect the public on State maintained highways including adequate insurance for payment of any
damages which might result during the construction, maintenance and operation of the facility
occupying such airspace or thereafter, and to save the State harmless from damages,to the extent of
said insurance coverage and insofar as it can legally do so. Prior to beginning work on the State's
right of way, the City 's construction contractor
shall submit to the State a completed insurance form (TxDOT Form No. 1560) and shall maintain the
required coverage during the construction of the facility.
14. USE OF RIGHT OF WAY
It is understood that the State by execution of this agreement does not impair or relinquish the State's
right to use such land for highway purposes when it is required for the construction or re-construction
of the traffic facility for which it was acquired, nor shall use of the land under such agreement ever be
construed as abandonment by the State of such land acquired for highway purposes, and the State
does not purport to grant any interest in the land described herein but merely consents to such use to
the extent its authority and title permits.
15. ADDITIONAL CONSENT REQUIRED
The State asserts only that it has sufficient title for highway purposes. The
City shall be responsible for obtaining such additional consent,
permits or agreement as may be necessary due to this agreement. This includes, but is not limited
to, appropriate permits and clearances for environmental, ADA and public utilities.
16. FHWA ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
If the Facility is located on the Federal-Aid Highway System, "ATTACHMENT A", which states
additional requirements as set forth in the Federal Highway Administration's Title 23, Code of Federal
Regulations, §710, shall be attached to and become a part of this agreement.
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 6 of 10
17. CIVIL RIGHTS ASSURANCES
The City for itself, its personal
representatives, successors and interests and assigns, as part of the consideration hereof, does
hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that: (1) no persons, on the ground
of race, color, sex, age, national origin, religion or disabling condition, shall be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of
said facility; (2)that in the construction of any improvements on, over or under such land and the
furnishing of services thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, sex, age, national origin,
religion or disabling condition, shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or
otherwise be subjected to discrimination; (3) that the
The City shall use the premises in compliance
with all other requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non-discrimination in
Federally-Assisted programs of the Department of Transportation - Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended.
That if in the event of any breach of the above non-discrimination covenants,the State shall have the
right to terminate the agreement and reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and
hold the same as if said agreement had never been made or issued.
18. AMENDMENTS
Any changes in the time frame, character or responsibilities of the parties hereto shall be enacted by
a written amendment executed by both parties hereto.
19. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION
In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any
provision hereof and this agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
provision had never been contained in this agreement.
Form 2044 (Rev.0512002)
Page 7 of 10
20. NOTICES
All notices required under this agreement shall be mailed or hand delivered to the following respective
addresses:
STATE (Name of other party)
(Mailing Address) (Mailing Address)
Texas Department of Transportation
Maintenance Division
125 East 11th Street
Austin, Texas 78701-2483
21. WARRANTS
The signatories to this agreement warrant that each has the authority to enter into this agreement on
behalf of the party represented.
List of Attached Exhibits:
Exhibit A-General Layout
Exhibit B- Metes and Bounds Description
Exhibit C -Approved Construction Plans
Exhibit D - Certificate of Insurance (TxDOT Form 1560)
Exhibit E -Attachment A (FHWA Additional Requirements)
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 8 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their signature, the
on the day of
20 , and the State on the day of 20
STATE OF TEXAS
Executed and approved for the Texas
(Name of other party) Transportation Commission for the purpose and
effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders,
and established policies or work programs
By:
Title heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas
Transportation Commission.
Printed Name
By:
Director, Maintenance Division
Date
Printed Name
Date
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
District Engineer
Printed Name
Date
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 9 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have hereunto affixed their signature, the
on the day of
20 , and the State on the day of 20
RECOMMENDED BY:
(Name of other party) By:
Executive Director
Texas Department of Transportation
By:
Title
Printed Name
Printed Name
Date
Date Executed for the State of Texas by the State's Chief
Executive Officer in accordance with Texas
Constitution, Article IV, § 10.
By:
Governor of Texas
Printed Name
Date
Form 2044 (Rev.05/2002)
Page 10 of 10
ATTACHMENT A
Inasmuch as this project is on the Federal-Aid highway system,the following additional requirements as
applicable with the Federal Highway Administration's Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, §710.
1. Any significant revision in the design or construction of the facility shall receive prior approval by the
Texas Department of Transportation subject to concurrency by the FHWA.
2. Any change in the authorized use of airspace shall receive prior approval by the Texas Department of
Transportation subject to concurrence by the FHWA.
3. The airspace shall not be transferred, assigned or conveyed to another party without prior Texas
Department of Transportation approval subject to concurrence by the FHWA.
4. This agreement will be revocable in the event that the airspace facility ceases to be used or is
abandoned.
EXHIBIT E
3
November 2,2004
Consider approving the allocation of$7,500 to be used as a revenue guarantee for Delta Airlines
to provide air service from the Southeast Texas Regional Airport to Atlanta, Georgia
Woftr City of Beaumont
sea
W Council Agenda Item
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 29, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider approving the allocation of $7,500 to be used a revenue
guarantee for Delta Airlines to provide air service from the
Southeast Texas Regional Airport to Atlanta, Georgia.
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved a $15,000 revenue guarantee on February 3, 2004 for Delta Airlines
to provide air service to Dallas. The City has an economic development contract with the
Beaumont Chamber of Commerce that was amended to allow the City to pay the revenue guarantee
through the Chamber of Commerce.
Delta defaulted on the original agreement with the Southeast Texas Coalition for Air Service, and
is now requesting a new revenue guarantee of $300,000 to provide service to Atlanta effective
February 1, 2005. The City of Beaumont can apply all or a portion of the original$15,000 toward
the new guarantee or the City can request all or a portion of the funds be returned.
I recommend that the City Council approve the allocation of$7,500 of the original$15,000 toward
the new guarantee for service to Atlanta and that the remainder of funds ($7,500) be kept in the
escrow account at Texas State Bank. Service to Atlanta will offer significant connections to an
alternative airport hub. There are 62 cities served through Atlanta that are not served from the
Houston airports. Service to Atlanta will continue the many economic benefits we now enjoy as
a result of having a second airline.
Delta Airlines would provide two flights per day, seven days a week, to Atlanta. If Delta Airlines
does not meet their revenue targets, the revenue guarantee will make up the difference up to
$300,000. After one year of service to Atlanta, the Coalition will participate in an audit of
Delta's records to determine whether or not any of the revenue guarantee must be paid. After
the audit is complete, any funds remaining will be paid back to the contributors based on a pro rata
share.
The original escrow agreement expires July 1, 2005. The Southeast Texas Coalition for Air
Service will continue efforts to locate a carrier to provide service to Dallas. If the Coalition is
successful in this endeavor,the City Council can consider appropriating the remaining funds. The
City of Beaumont may also request a refund of the $7,500. Texas State Bank cannot release any
funds until the Letter of Credit issued to Delta has been fully released and the time line for the
release is not known at this time.
A letter from the Southeast Texas Coalition for Air Service, LLC is attached for your review.
October 4,2004
Dear Revenue Guarantee Investor,
First, we want to again offer "thanks" for your revenue guarantee investment and overall support of
the efforts of the Southeast Texas Coalition for Air Service. One of the greatest successes of the effort
earlier this y ear was the private/public partnerships and regional unity o f the v arious g roups w ithin
Southeast Texas.
As you are aware, Delta has defaulted on our original agreement and has presented Southeast Texas
with an offer to provide service to Atlanta effective February 1. They have requested a new revenue
guarantee be developed capped at$300,000. We realize air service to Atlanta does not meet the needs
of many with business and personal matters in Dallas, but it does offer significant connections to an
alternative airport hub. There are 62 cities served via A tlanta that are n of s erved from the H ouston
airports. Keeping a second airline at the Southeast Texas Regional Airport with the associated landing
fees, local jobs, and potential sales tax impact from car rentals and hotels seems worth a strong effort
to keep Delta flying. It provides choices for domestic and international travel and positions Southeast
Texas for expanded business activity.
In the meantime,we are continuing efforts to locate a carrier to provide service to Dallas.Given factors
affecting the airline industry, we feel it's important for you to understand that we currently have no
viable prospects for that service at this time.
We are presenting several options for you to consider,clearly noting that your investment is being
managed by Texas State Bank and is safe. One option is to keep the money in the escrow account
pending prospects for a new alternative for service to Dallas. The original escrow agreement expires
July 1,2005.
Many of you have expressed support toward the new revenue guarantee for service to Atlanta. Those
of you wishing to apply all or a portion of your funds to that guarantee can simply respond by
contacting Jim Rich at jimrichna,bmtcoc.org or Verna Rutherford at verna@portarthurtexas.com by 5
p.m., October 15. During the next several weeks, another escrow agreement will be prepared and
submitted for your signature.
Those of you who would like all or a portion of your funds returned to you as soon as possible can
respond to us in the same way. Please understand that Texas State Bank as our escrow agent cannot
release your funds until the Letter of Credit issued to Delta has been fully released. We do not know
exactly what date that will be accomplished.
We realize the decision for some public entities and others may have to be placed on your agendas for
action,so just let us know the dates,and we will attend to respond to questions.
In any case, we commend you for your commitment to economic development in Southeast Texas.
Jim Rich,President Verna Rutherford,President
Beaumont Chamber of Commerce Port Arthur Chamber of Commerce
4
November 2,2004
Consider amending Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinance to adopt new regulations regarding
solicitation in and alongside streets
City of Beaumont
� c
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 26, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Council amend Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances to adopt new
regulations regarding solicitation in and alongside streets.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends approval of an ordinance adopting new regulations regarding
solicitation in and alongside streets.
BACKGROUND
The City was contacted by a representative from a charitable organization that wished to solicit
contributions for their organization. The Texas Transportation Code presently makes it unlawful
for a person to stand in the roadway to engage in a charitable solicitation activity unless municipal
regulations allowing for such solicitation exist. The adoption of this ordinance will allow charitable
solicitation within the streets of the City under certain conditions and prohibit sales of goods or
services in or along side streets within the public rights-of-way. The Police Department will be
responsible for the application process and the subsequent monitoring for compliance with the
ordinance. A copy of the proposed ordinance and the list of approved intersections are enclosed.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
There is a $50 application fee to defray the City's costs of both processing the application and
compliance monitoring.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, City Attorney, Police Chief and Public Works Director
TWSolicitationStreets.wpd
October 26,2004
ORDINANCE NO,
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE VII REGULATING SOLICITATION
IN AND ALONGSIDE STREETS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL; AND
PROVIDING A PENALTY.
Section 1.
WHEREAS, §552.057, Transportation Code of the state of Texas presently make
it unlawful for a person to stand in a roadway to engage in a charitable solicitation activity;
and,
WHEREAS, such statute allows for municipal regulation of such solicitation; and,
WHEREAS, the council desires to allow charitable solicitation within the streets of
the City under certain conditions and prohibit sales of goods or services in or alongside
streets within public rights of way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED
BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
THAT Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Beaumont be and the same is
hereby amended to add a new Article VII to read as follows:
ARTICLE VII. SOLICITING IN AND ALONGSIDE THE STREET
Sec.18-32. Definitions.
For purpose of this section, the following terms have the meaning stated here:
"charitable organization," or"organization" means an entity that the United States Internal
SAPUBLIC WORKS%SOUCITATIONRevised102604.wpd
Revenue Service recognizes to be a charitable organization or a church. "Contribution"
means currency, coin, or check. "Location" means the approaches to an intersection
equipped with a traffic control signal light and within one-hundred feet of such an
intersection that has been approved by the Public Works Director or his designee.
Sec.18-33.
No person shall stand in or alongside a street or highway within the public right of
way and sell or attempt to sell any goods or services or solicit, or attempt to solicit,
employment, business or contributions from the occupant of any vehicle.
The prohibition, however, does not apply to a person soliciting contributions for
charitable organizations which have been issued a permit under this Article and who are
in compliance with other provisions of this Article.
Sec. 18-34.
In order to solicit contributions while standing in or alongside a street or highway
within the public right-of-way, a charitable organization must comply with the following
requirements:
(a) Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date desired for soliciting, submit
a complete application to the City Police Chief or designee for a permit. The
Police Department shall create a form and review procedure for this
purpose. The form shall require the name of the charitable organization, a
point of contact for the organization (meaning the name and phone number
of the individual seeking the permit for the organization);the desired date(s)
SAPUBLIC WORMSOUMATIONReWsed102604.wpd
and specific locations(s) for soliciting; the name, address, phone number
and age of each individual who may solicit contributions on behalf of the
organization and,an agreement of the organization indemnifying the city and
holding it harmless from any and all claims, suits, demands, damages, and
attorney fees arising out of or related to the acts or omissions of persons
soliciting for the organization. The form may require further information that
is reasonably necessary to the direct enforcement of this section and the
purposes of this article.
(b) At the time of submitting a completed application,the organization shall also
submit the following items and failure to do so renders the application
incomplete:
(1) Fee payment in the sum of fifty($50)dollars(cash or money order only)
to defray the City's costs of both processing the application and
compliance monitoring on the Street. This fee is non-refundable, unless
the permit is denied.
(2) Provide written proof of liability insurance in the minimum amounts of
Two-hundred fifty-thousand ($250,000) Dollars for personal injury or
death to any one (1) person, and Five-hundred Thousand ($500,000)
Dollars per occurrence of death or personal injury, and One-hundred
Thousand ($100,000) Dollars per occurrence of property damage or
destruction. The City must be an additional named insured on the policy
S:\PUBLr-WCRKS\SOLCffATIONRevisedlo26D4.wpd
and specify that such insurance is primary. The insurance policy must
be issued by a company authorized to do business in Texas and have
an effective date that covers the date(s) of street soliciting.
(3) Provide written proof that the organization is a charitable organization,
along -with a copy of the organization's charter (or if a foreign
organization, then a copy of its certificate of authority to do business in
Texas).
(c) No more than three (3) permits per calendar year may be issued to an
organization. For purposes of this subsection, local chapters of a state,
national or international organization are deemed separate organizations,
but committees or other subdivisions of an organization are not so deemed.
(d) A permit shall authorize street soliciting only for three (3) consecutive
calendar days, between the period of 9:00 a.m. and one (1) hour prior to
sunset, at the approved locations(s) specified in the permit.
(e) The Police Chief or designee shall not issue an organization a permit for a
given date(s) or location(s) if a permit has already been issued to another
organization for such date(s) and location(s).
(f) The Police Chief or designee shall grant a permit if the organization provides
the information and documents, and meets the requirements stated in the
above subsections (a) through (e) inclusive. The Police Chief or designee
shall advise the organization's point of contact of the decision to grant or
SAPUBLIC WORKSISOLICITATIONRevised1 02604.wPd
deny the permit, not later than the tenth day after date of receiving the
application fee and all required information.
(g) Permits may only be issued for street segments and intersections approved
by the Public Works director. A list of approved locations may be obtained
from the Police Department.
Sec. 18-35.
If a permit is granted, it shall state the name of the organization, the names of
persons who will be soliciting contributions for the organization and,the approved date(s)
and location(s). The organization shall at its expense make sufficient copies of the permit
to have a copy with each solicitor at each approved location and, shall readily present
such copy for inspection upon demand by any person.
Sec. 18-36.
It is an offense for a person to solicit or attempt to solicit contributions, for a
charitable organization that is issued a permit and fail to:
(a) Be at least sisteen (16) years of age; or,
(b) Be named on the organization's permit; or,
(c) Wear a reflective orange or yellow visibility vest as the outer-most
garment; or,
(d) Be in the street or highway only when the controlling traffic signal light
prohibits vehicle movement in that lane; or,
SAPUBIIC WORKS ISOUCITATIONRWiSW102604.wpd
(e) Place an orange traffic control cone, not less than twenty-four (24) inches
in height, on the center stripe of each street and highway approaching the intersection,
at least one-hundred (100) to one-hundred and fifty (150)feet from the intersection, to
warn drives of a hazard ahead; or,
(f) Present for inspection a copy of the permit upon demand by any person.
(g) Place a sign or signs at the intersection which complies with the
requirements of Exhibit A. and the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.
Sec. 18-37.
It is an offense for any person to obstruct, tamper with, alter, cover, or post any
object on or to a traffic control device. Traffic control device includes but is not limited
to: median markers, reflectors, signal control boxes, regulatory signs, directional signs,
warning signs, and pedestrian walk lights.
Sec. 18-38.
Any peace officer observing any violation of any requirement or prohibition of
this section is authorized to issue a citation for the person to appear in municipal court
to answer the charge. Upon issuance of the citation, such person shall immediately
cease soliciting or attempting to solicit any charitable contribution under that
organization's permit. However, it is not the intent of this provision to bar such person
from participating in future charitable solicitations approved under th provisions of this
article.
S.WBLIC WORKSISM1CrrAT"R&ASW102W4.wpd
Section 2.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or
the application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances, should for any
reason be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of
this ordinance, and to such end the various portions and provisions of this ordinance
are declared to be severable.
SAPUBLIC WORKS\SOLJCITATIONRevisedlo2604.wpd
Section 3.
That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the
extent of the conflict only.
Section 4.
That any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall, upon
conviction, be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Beaumont, Texas.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of_
, 2004.
-Mayor Evelyn M. Lord -
S:TUBUC WORKS%SOUCITATtONRevised102604.wpd
APPROVED INTERSECTIONS FOR
SOLICITATION IN AND ALONGSIDE STREETS
October 2004
College Street&IH-10 Frontage Roads
Lucas Street&Eastex Freeway Frontage Roads
Dowlen Road&Eastex Freeway Frontage Roads
Dowlen Road&Phelan Boulevard
Fannett Road&Cardinal Freeway Frontage Roads
5
November 2,2004
Consider amending Ordinance No. 04-041 relating to the structure located at 3491 W. Euclid
Cit y of Beaumont
�• Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Pam Loiacano, Field Supervisor
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 26, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 04-041
relating to the structure located at 3491 W. Euclid.
RECOMMENDATION
The Administration recommends denial of the request for amendment of the condemnation order.
BACKGROUND
Councilmember Patterson requests that the condemnation order for the structure located at 3491
W. Euclid be reconsidered by Council to allow the property owner, Morris Jones, Jr., to
rehabilitate it.
This structure was brought before City Council on May 4, 2004 with staff's recommendation of
a raze order. No work had been attempted on structure since 2000. On May 19, 2004, Staff spoke
with Adona Jones, daughter of property owner. She asked for some time to remove furniture and
personal belongings from the structure. On May 24, 2004, Morris Jones and Adona Jones each
called and said that they now wanted to rehabilitate the structure. The structure was brought back
before City Council on June 8, 2004 for reconsideration and was given a raze or repair order of
120 days, October 8, 2004, to complete rehabilitation of the structure. On October 7, 2004,
substantial work had not been accomplished and the structure became condemned for the second
time.
BUDGETARY EVIPACT
City may incur the cost of demolition if the structure is not rehabilitated.
PREVIOUS ACTION
The Administration recommended and Council approved a raze order for this structure on May
4, 2004. A raze or repair order was issued by Council on June 8, 2004 for 120 days.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
If Council grants a time period for rehabilitation, staff will enroll the owner in a work program
and monitor the progress of work. If the structure is not brought up to code or substantial
progress is not made within the specified time period, the structure will be demolished without
any further notification to property owner or Council action.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and Building Official.
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
CLEAN COMMUNITY
CITY OF BEAUMONT
DATE REQUESTED November , 2004 WARD 4
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3491 W. Euclid
ACCOUNT NO. - 11550-10800-2 CENSUS TRACT 22
OWNER - Morris Jones, Jr. c/o Adona Jones
ADDRESS 320 Charlotte CITY/STATE (05)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPRAISAL VALUE
Lot or Plat Lot 12 Land Value 1370
Block or Tract Block 8 Improvement Value 3660
Addition/Survey Carver Terrace Total Value 5030
A. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO X
NO JR.W.,00. 31M....-WO&R-
k wr,:Pr 0j 0 �:-
.. .......... 0--3.0 ..
E. Initial Inspection Date January 11,2000
.........................
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure is an extreme danger because of a massive bee infestation,
Attempts have been made to get rid of the bees but as of the last inspeWon on October 252004, they were
still there, There is extensive deterioration to the foundation, The structure is listing to the left, The
interior flooring,ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired, Bees are in the wall on the
lefirside of the-structure, AR damaged electrical-wiring and electrical fW* ures will need to be replaced,
Outside service needed, Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures wiH need to be replaced,
This structure appeared before City Council on May., 2004 and was given raze order per staff's
recommendation, On May 24, 2004, Morris Jones and Adona on called saying that they wanted to
make repairs to the structure, The structure was brought back before Council on June 8, 2004 for
reconsideration and w -. an additional 120 days to complete repairs, Because adequate or substantial
work had not been done the structure was again condemned Staff recommends a raze order for this
structure,
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS
DATE: October 22, 2004
TO: Councilperson Bobbie Patterson
FROM: Pamela Loiacano, Demolition Field Supervisor
SUBJECT: 3491 W. Euclid
COMMENT:
♦ The structure at 3491 W. Euclid was tagged on 1/11/00 as a dangerous structure. The
property owner was listed on the Jefferson County tax roll as Morris Jones, Jr. with a
mailing address to the vacant structure.
♦ A certified notice was issued to the property owner on 1/13/00.
♦ The certified notice was returned unclaimed.
♦ On 01/20/00, Adona Jones, daughter to Morris Jones, Jr., called and said that her
father was very ill and gave me her mailing address of 4150 Brandon. I re-mailed the
letter to her notifying them that the structure was tagged as substandard.
♦ The property owner signed a Work Program Agreement on 6/13/00 that went through
10/13/00. A building permit was bought on 6/15/00.
♦ A certified notice was issued to the property owner 4/13/04 indicating that the structure
would be presented before City Council on 5/04/04.
♦ Certified notice was returned as being attempted - unknown.
♦ Published in Beaumont Enterprise on 4/21/04 and 4/28/04.
♦ Structure appeared before City Council on 5/4/04. Staff recommended a raze order for
this structure because of the extensive deterioration. It was noted during the inspection
that a massive bee infestation was in the wall on the left side of the structure.
Certified notice was issued to Morris Jones, Jr. c/o Adona Jones stating that City
Council had condemned the structure.
Certified letter was returned as moved, left no address.
Staff issued certified final notice to property owner on 5/14/04 indicating that the
structure would be demolished by city forces.
Certified notice was returned as attempted - unknown.
On 05/19/04, Adona Jones called inquiring about red spray painted numbers being put
on house. Council order was explained to her and she asked that they be given time to
remove furniture and personal belongings from the house. She was told to keep in
touch with our office to get status of demo date and that there would be no charge.
On 5/24/04, Morris Jones and Adona Jones called saying that they wanted to now make
repairs to the structure. It was during this conversation with Mr. Jones that a new
mailing address was given at 320 Charlotte.
• Structure at 3491 W. Euclid appeared for the second time before City Council on
6/8/04 for reconsideration and ordinance amendment to allow the property owner to
rehabilitate the structure.
City Council allowed an additional 120 days with the abatement date of 10/8/04 to
complete repairs on the structure.
A building repair permit was purchased 6/10/04.
On 10/7/04, an inspection was made at 3491 W. Euclid because abatement time was
the following day. It was noted that work was being done by the employee of Mr.
Charlie Mays, the contractor. There was sheetrock being hung and staff had some
concerns because it appeared that the rotten material had not been replaced. The
foundation also had not been repaired. A couple of days later staff met with Mr. Mays
and Adona Jones at the structure. Staff tried to explain what was being done wrong but
could not make Mr. Mays understand that because of the poor craftsmanship, the little
work that had been done was not adequate or substantial. The structure became
condemned by order of City Council for the second time. A telephone conversation
with Mr. Morris Jones also explained the condemnation order procedure.
On 10/15/04, the Manager's office received a telephone call from Mr. Charlie Mays
saying that he was assisting Mr. Jones in repairing his house and that he was told by the
city to stop work because the work order had expired. Staff attempted to call Mr. Mays
twice on 10/15/04 but received no answer each time.
F.
A.
r x .Ya
s9^
1' x
�t
n'
t
,F f
�t
k t
3491 EUCLID W.
3
Y �
5
. 40 01,.
x 5 z
§
^
t
n._ a All .,... ��
�u 3
6
November 2,2004
Consider Consider amending Ordinance No. 04-041 relating to the structure located at 2925
Harriot
...... City of Beaumont
�• Council Agenda Item
� c
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Pam Loiacano, Field Supervisor
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2004
AGENDA MEMO DATE: October 26, 2004
REQUESTED ACTION: Consider an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 04-041
relating to the structure located at 2925 Harriot.
RECOMNIENDATION
The Administration recommends denial of the request for amendment of the condemnation order.
BACKGROUND
Councilmember Patterson requests that the condemnation order for the structure located at 2925
Harriot be reconsidered by Council to allow Winfred Mays, son of deceased property owner and
Genevieve Mays Comeaux, daughter of deceased property owner, to rehabilitate it.
This structure was brought before City Council on May 4, 2004 with staff's recommendation of
a raze order. Executor of Will, Winfred Mays, had previously enrolled in a work repair program
in September of 2003. No permit was ever bought. On inspection made March 26, 2004, it was
noted that there was extensive structural and foundation problems with this structure. Mr.
Winfred Mays still wanted to rehabilitate the structure. The structure was brought back before
City Council on June 8, 2004 for reconsideration and was given a raze or repair order of 120
days, October 8, 2004, to complete rehabilitation of the structure. An inspection made October
8, 2004, indicated substantial work had not been made and the structure became condemned for
the second time. Mr. Mays had enrolled in a work repair program but still never purchased a
repair permit.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
City may incur the cost of demolition if the structure is not rehabilitated.
PREVIOUS ACTION
The Administration recommended and Council approved a raze order for this structure on May
4, 2004. A raze or repair order was issued by Council on June 8, 2004 for 120 days.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
If Council grants a time period for rehabilitation, staff will enroll Mr. Mays in a work program
and monitor the progress of work. If the structure is not brought up to code or substantial
progress is not made within the specified time period, the structure will be demolished without
any further notification to property owner or Council action.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and Building Official.
SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
CLEAN COMMUNITY
CITY OF BEAUMONT
DATE REQUESTED November , 2004 WARD 4
ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2925 Harriot
ACCOUNT NO. 6450-273004 CENSUS TRACT 22
OWNER Gladys W Mays do Winfred Mays (Also Genevieve Mays Comeaux)
ADDRESS _4215 Simon CITY/STATE (05)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPRAISAL VALUE
Lot or Plat Lots 2-4 Land Value 3530
Block or Tract Block 15 Improvement Value 4990
Addition/Survey Booker Heights Total Value 8520
A. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO
B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO
C. Fire damaged? YES NO X
D Enrolled m dirk Rep2ur P Ogram YES NO ( W0.3 thru.01- 9-04
E. Initial Inspection Date uA ust 18. 2003 OG(}8-fl4:tluru Itl ?$-04
F. TAXES:'ARE L?UE IN.1' AIfJU11T73 82
MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed The
rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is water damage to the interior
fue to the condition of the roof, There is a leak in the kitchen All damaged or rotten windows and
window As will need to be repaired The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced There
is extensive termite damage to the structure Some exterior siding is rotten and missing= The back porch
flooring has been removed Attempts have been made to repair the foundation but work was done
incorrectly and no permits were bought The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and wil l
need to be repaired The back exterior wall shows extensive rot and deterioration All damaged electrical
rte' .g and electrical rudures will need to be replaced New outside electrical service will be needed Also
all damaged plumbing and plumbing ffixtures will need to be replaced The structure is open and
cessible This structure appeared before City Council_ on May 4, 2004 and a raze order was given Ms
Genevieve Mays Comeaux and Winfred Mays requested that they be given additional time to repair the
structure The structure was presented before City Council on June 8, 2004 for reconsideration Council
allowed another 120 days to rehabilitate the Structure Winfred Mays enrolled in a work repair program
on_June 14 2004 that ended on October 8, 2004 No repair permit was ever purchased Staff's
recommendation is for a raze order for this structure,
SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS
DATE: October 22, 2004
TO: Councilmember Bobbie Patterson
FROM: Pamela Loiacano, Demolition Field Supervisor
SUBJECT: 2925 Harriot
COMMENT:
♦ The structure at 2925 Harriot was tagged on 8/18/03 as a dangerous structure. The
property owner was listed on the Jefferson County tax roll as Gladys W. Mays who is
deceased. The notification was mailed in care of her daughter, Genevieve Mays
Comeaux in Baytown, Texas.
♦ The certified notice was received by Genevieve Mays Comeaux.
♦ On 09/9/03 Winfred Mays, son of Gladys Mays, brought in a Last Will and Testament
declaring him as Independent Executor. Substandard notification letter was then sent
to Mr. Mays at 4215 Simon in Beaumont.
♦ Winfred Mays received and signed certified letter on 10/3/03.
♦ Mr. Mays signed a work program agreement on 9/9/03 that went through
♦ 1/9/04. No permit was bought.
♦ On 2/10/04 Genevieve Mays brought in a notarized demo consent form along with a
Power of Attorney signed by her mother in May of 1998 giving her Power of Attorney
over property. The Power of Attorney was invalid since Gladys Mays was deceased.
♦ A certified notice was issued to Winfred Mays 4/13/04 indicating that the structure
would be presented before City Council on 5/04/04.
♦ Certified notice was received by Mr. Mays.
♦ Published in Beaumont Enterprise on 4/21/04 and 4/28/04.
Structure appeared before City Council on 5/4/04. Staff recommended a raze order for
this structure because of the extensive deterioration. It was noted during the inspection
that there was extensive foundation problems, termite damage and water damage to the
interior of the structure.
Certified notice was issued to Winfred Mays stating that City Council had condemned
the structure.
Certified letter was signed for by C. S. Pumphrey.
Staff issued certified final notice to property owner on 5/14/04 indicating that the
structure would be demolished by city forces.
Certified notice was received and signed for by Mr. Mays.
Mr. Mays came by office to inquire how he could save house and be allowed more time
for repair. He contacted Ms. Patterson to set another date for reconsideration.
Structure at 2925 Harriot appeared for the second time before City Council on 6/8/04
for reconsideration and ordinance amendment to allow the property owner to
rehabilitate the structure.
City Council allowed a new time frame of 10/8/04 to complete repairs on the structure.
Mr. Mays signed a new work repair program on 6/14/04. No permit was ever
purchased.
On 10/7/04, an inspection was made at 2925 Harriot because abatement time was the
following day. Some foundation work had been done but it was noted that it was not
done correctly and no permits were bought. Staff spoke with the gentleman that was
at the house on the day of the inspection and he said he was a brother of Mr. Winfred
Mays. I explained that the foundation work was done incorrectly and that no permit
was bought and that this could not be considered substantial work. I told him to have
Winfred Mays call me. I spoke with Mr. Mays and told him the work was not correct
and no permits had been bought. He told me that he would take care of that because
he had paid the contractor his money already. I did not hear from anyone again until
the letter of condemnation had been received by Mr. Mays on 10/18/04.
Final certified letter was sent to Winfred Mays and to Genevieve Mays Comeaux stating
that the structure was condemned again and would be demolished.
v�
x �
a
w '
.Hy.
'u iu Y
r
fi3
Mill.
won S
AKI-
.
LF-
n ,ax.
a
Nei x
x v R
M'
ll"M.
2925 HARRIOT
a
! t
ra e
x
j„
nA
fpl
4 C a. 3•,t�' �9[r' .'f v'j �kSkL"ith `A
'fir f`f�yry� � 4
r
i 'f
a.
v
d
c i w rew- rr x
i
as
»+ ar
� wr
iF
1
b p
F 3 Y `t1_>.fi
#,� lyg�3d
F t
�`
`#+a
��
y_r '
�.,
Y
_Y �'�
�, ��
�'� ��'.
�' ��, �S
f � r;
�:. �
—� �' .,
s� � �: � a
i � ���'�r 1 ���
�� ;,r,�� f i I r I 11
� �
�` r
k
� rz �
��� �� 4?', �t� � _
iE
y „�
��%: �� �
' -�� v` ��
��,
t ��
�:'.
E
� �t' �
��
7.f�'
f`P,
�r: �����
..,,b, �,_.1� ;M
s; � ��
�� .� .-�.
n a �,
�.��' ;fit _.._ y � x
F�
n .r '.
-,. �. ,.
_ Fie;a.
F
f .� -f� L 7 ufV byLd Im Y t
7 ?
< <
✓� k ��y� (tf�Sv
>..,,�
I
C�
,eat
<� s
w is
2925 HARRIOT
I
n
i
o- .}
r T`
� 4
o-. 5
>n
z -
..r
` t
Y p�
4t �S
pr
soon 0
Rl-
4h �
g �q
G
r
u d
+. _ 10'.20.
wi"N A
'i Tt���C� s�'u',"bz '�• e�•"�''�t'e, �''3�a rs � �, � sx»*„�E
`Y T
f�
4�Ni.su
�a•
t
E
f sr �r e 3•�'
INSIDE 2925 HARRIOT
I_
t
s
All
Win
X P a I �t
3
k.
J Y'
W
u
! .