HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET JULY 01 2003 City of Beaurnont
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 19 2003 1.30 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
Invocation Pledge Roll Call
Presentations and Recognition
Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items/Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. Consider amending Section 26-13 of the Code of Ordinances to authorize the
Public Works Director or his designee to implement reduced speed zones in and
around areas of roadway construction within the City limits
WORKSESSION
Review proposed FY 2004 Transit Budget
Review Articles VII - XVII of the City Charter
COMMENTS
Councilmernbers/City Manager comment on various matters
Public Comment (Persons are limited to 3 minutes)
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Consider matters related to contemplated or pending litigation in accordance with
Section 551.071 of the Government Code:
Youth Rescue Mission
1930 Franklin Street
Beaumont, Texas
Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids
or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 880-3725 a day prior to the meeting.
1
July 1,2003
Consider amending Section 26-13 of the Code of Ordinances to authorize the Public Works Director
or his designee to implement reduced speed zones in and around areas ofroadway construction within
the City limits
I
ti.. Cit y of Beaumont
7ejj Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Mark Horelica, Transportation Manager
MEETING DATE: July 1, 2003
AGENDA MEMO DATE: June 19, 2003
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider amending Section 26-13 of the Code of Ordinances
authorizing the Public Works Director or his designee to implement
reduced speed zones in and around areas of roadway construction
within the City limits.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Section 26-13 be amended to include the following:
Replace the phrase "Director of Urban Transportation" with "Director of Pubic Works or his
designee," and to further authorize the Director of Public Works or his designee.....
(24) to establish "temporary" reduced speed zones, based on engineering and traffic
investigations, along portions of roadways within the City that are under construction or
repair. Such reduced speed zones will terminate upon completion of the roadway
improvements.
BACKGROUND
Organizational changes within the Public Works Department have necessitated the change from
Director of Urban Transportation to Public Works Director or his designee.
A recent request from the Texas Department of Transportation has revealed the need to expand
the authority of the Public Works Director to establish temporary speed zones.
The repair or reconstruction of roadways within the City often create conditions that require
motorists to reduce speeds to insure both their safety and the safety of construction workers. The
reduced speed zones will only be used where acceptable traffic engineering practices deem them
necessary. This reduced speed limit will terminate and the prior speed limit will be reimplemented
immediately upon the removal or elimination of the conditions(s) that prompted installation.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director, City Engineer and Transportation Manager.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny amending Section 26-13 of the Code of Ordinances authorizing the Public Works
Director or his designee to implement speed zones in and around areas of roadway construction
within the City.
SpdLmts06O3.wpd
ORDINANCE NO.
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26,
SECTION 26-13 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO IMPLEMENT SPEED
ZONES IN AND AROUND AREAS OF ROADWAY
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL AND
PROVIDING A PENALTY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT:
Section 1.
THAT Chapter 26 is hereby amended to remove the phrase "Director of Urban
Transportation" and substitute with the phrase"Director of Public Works or his designee"
in the first paragraph of Sec. 26-13. Additionally, Sec. 26-13 is amended to add a new
subsection (24) to read as follows:
Sec. 26-13
(24) to establish"temporary"reduced speed zones, based on engineering
and traffic investigations, along portions of roadways within the City that are
under construction or repair. Such reduced speed zones will terminate upon
completion of the roadway improvements.
Section 2.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or
the application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances should for any
reason be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of
this ordinance, and to such end the various portions and provisions of this ordinance
are declared to be severable.
Section 3.
That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed to the
extent of the conflict only.
Section 4.
That any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall, upon
conviction, be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Beaumont, Texas.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 1 st day of
July, 2003.
- Mayor Evelyn M. Lord -
WORK SESSION
* Review proposed FY 2004 Transit Budget
* Review Articles VII - XVII of the City Charter
CITY OF BEAUMONT
...... PUBLIC WORKS
' = ` INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
June 25, 2003
TO: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2004 TRANSIT BUDGET
COMMENT:
The Transportation Division has completed a preliminary FY 2004 Budget for Beaumont
Municipal Transit(BMT). Although the proposed operating budget of$3.4 million is the
same as the FY 2003 budget, a potential reduction in federal and state funding may occur.
This would have a significant impact on the FY 2004 budget. As of this date, the amount
of federal and state funding BMT will receive has not been determined.
A summary of the FY 2003 and proposed FY 2004 funding,by source,is provided below:
Projected Actual Projected
Funding Source FY 2003 * FY 2003 FY 2004
Fare Box $ 650,000 $ 540,000 $ 536,800
Federal 1,264,400 1,393,000 1,393,000
State 313,000 313,000 313,000
Local 1,237,300 1,127,700 1,145,000
Planning 15,000 15,000 15,000
Charter 6,200 6,200 6,200
Advertising 14,100 14,100
Total $3,500,000 $3,409,000 $3,409,000
* The Projected FY 2003 federal and state funding was based on
amounts from previous years. The exact funding was not known
until after the City's budget had been adopted.
To: Kyle Hayes
From: Tom Warner
RE: Proposed FY 2004
Transit Budget
June 23,2003
Page 2 of 4
The reduction in fare box revenue is contributed to the fare increase and the midday
service reductions that occurred in November 2001. Current advertising revenue is
generated by the bus "wraps." Existing contracts will expire at the end of the year and
there has been no interest expressed for continuation or new wraps.
In addition to the potential reduction in federal and state funding, a modification to the
funding formula is currently under consideration by Congress. This funding allocation,
identified as the High Intensity Transit Tier, would be established as a part of the Federal
Transit Administration(FTA) formula program in the authorization bill being developed
to replace TEA-21.
The current FTA formula for small urbanized areas (serving populations between 50,000
and 200,000)only takes into consideration population and population density. The formula
for larger jurisdictions (over 200,000)takes into consideration the level of transit service
provided such as passengers per mile and passengers per hour. As a result, there are a
number of communities that provide higher levels of service to more riders per capita
than their larger counterparts and receive far fewer dollars simply because of their
smaller overall populations. The High Intensity Transit Tier recognizes service levels as
an important consideration in determining the amount of funding that a city should receive.
Under the proposed funding formula, the City would receive an additional $320,000 of
federal funding in FY 2004 increasing to$498,000 in FY 2009, if approved by Congress.
It should be noted that the funding amounts were calculated based on 2001 ridership. The
2001 increase in fares and the service reductions resulted in a loss of approximately
296,000 riders. If the City was to obtain this additional funding in the amount projected,
ridership would have to increase to approximately 2001 levels.
A decision on the funding amounts that the City will receive for FY 2004 could occur as
early as August 2003 or as late as next year. Even if the amounts were known in August
2003 that could be too late to incorporate them into the FY 2004 City budget process. Due
to the uncertainty of the funding amounts, it is recommended that the following proposals
be implemented to offset any reduction in funding.
• Proposal One
In November 2001 the number of buses on the street during the midday
hours was reduced from twelve to nine. The impact of this service
reduction was a loss in ridership of approximately 296,000. This loss in
ridership was reflected in a reduction in fare box revenue.
Recommendation One
The estimated cost to resume midday service is $196,600 with an
To: Kyle Hayes
From: Tom Warner
RE: Proposed FY 2004
Transit Budget
June 23, 2003
Page 3 of 4
estimated increase in revenue of $222,300, based on the current fare
structure.
The implementation of this recommendation would result in a net revenue
increase of $24,700. It is not known at this time if ridership can be
increased to 2001 levels. However, if only 85 percent of the ridership
lost returned to use BMT, this would result in a breakeven proposal.
• Proposal Two
The cost to provide a reliable and efficient transit system has continued
to increase while federal and state funding has decreased. The only
alternative to replace this loss in revenue is to raise fares. Prior to the
November 2001 fare increase, the last fare increase occurred in 1997.
Recommendation Two
The following fare schedule is recommended to become effective
October 1, 2003.
Current Proposed
Fare Tyne Fare Fare
Adult $ 1.00 $ 1.25
Youth 0.50 0.75
Monthly Pass 30.00 40.00
STS 2.00 2.50
STS ( Fully NA 20.00
Allocated Cost)**
Transfers Free 0.25
** The City's interpretation of the Federal regulations allows a transit
system to charge social service agencies the difference between
the complementary STS fare and the full allocated cost of the
trip. A local agency disagrees with this interpretation and the
City has been unable to get a written opinion from the FTA. The
difference between the fares is $17.50. This issue was
previously considered during the FY 2002 Budget preparations.
Enclosed is a memo explaining the issue in greater detail.
The resumption of midday service and the implementation of the fare increase is
anticipated to generate an additional revenue of$24,700 and$349,300, respectively. Of
To: Kyle Hayes
From: Tom Warner
RE: Proposed FY 2004
Transit Budget
June 23,2003
Page 4 of 4
the revenue generated from fare increases, $175,000 is from charging the fully allocated
fare to social service agencies. It is anticipated that the revenue generated will be
sufficient to offset the loss in federal and/or state revenue. However, if funding is
reduced more than$370,000 service reductions such as elimination of late night service
may have to be considered.
_rc y Lr Z-r
Tom Warner
TW:sk
CITY OF BEAUMONT
...... PUBLIC WORKS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
June 25, 2003
TO: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2004 TRANSIT BUDGET
COMMENT:
The Transportation Division has completed a preliminary FY 2004 Budget for Beaumont
Municipal Transit(BMT). Although the proposed operating budget of$3.4 million is the
same as the FY 2003 budget, a potential reduction in federal and state funding may occur.
This would have a significant impact on the FY 2004 budget. As of this date, the amount
of federal and state funding BMT will receive has not been determined.
A summary of the FY 2003 and proposed FY 2004 funding,by source,is provided below:
Projected Actual Projected
Funding Source FY 2003 * FY 2003 FY 2004
Fare Box $ 650,000 $ 540,000 $ 536,800
Federal 1,264,400 1,393,000 1,393,000
State 313,000 313,000 313,000
Local 1,237,300 1,127,700 1,145,000
Planning 15,000 15,000 15,000
Charter 6,200 6,200 6,200
Advertising 14,100 14,100
Total $3,500,000 $3,409,000 $3,409,000
* The Projected FY 2003 federal and state funding was based on
amounts from previous years. The exact funding was not known
until after the City's budget had been adopted.
To: Kyle Hayes
From: Tom Warner
RE: Proposed FY 2004
Transit Budget
June 23, 2003
Page 2 of 4
The reduction in fare box revenue is contributed to the fare increase and the midday
service reductions that occurred in November 2001. Current advertising revenue is
generated by the bus "wraps." Existing contracts will expire at the end of the year and
there has been no interest expressed for continuation or new wraps.
In addition to the potential reduction in federal and state funding, a modification to the
funding formula is currently under consideration by Congress. This funding allocation,
identified as the High Intensity Transit Tier, would be established as a part of the Federal
Transit Administration(FTA)formula program in the authorization bill being developed
to replace TEA-21.
The current FTA formula for small urbanized areas(serving populations between 50,000
and 200,000)only takes into consideration population and population density. The formula
for larger jurisdictions(over 200,000)takes into consideration the level of transit service
provided such as passengers per mile and passengers per hour. As a result, there are a
number of communities that provide higher levels of service to more riders per capita
than their larger counterparts and receive far fewer dollars simply because of their
smaller overall populations. The High Intensity Transit Tier recognizes service levels as
an important consideration in determining the amount of funding that a city should receive.
Under the proposed funding formula, the City would receive an additional $320,000 of
federal funding in FY 2004 increasing to$498,000 in FY 2009,if approved by Congress.
It should be noted that the funding amounts were calculated based on 2001 ridership. The
2001 increase in fares and the service reductions resulted in a loss of approximately
296,000 riders. If the City was to obtain this additional funding in the amount projected,
ridership would have to increase to approximately 2001 levels.
A decision on the funding amounts that the City will receive for FY 2004 could occur as
early as August 2003 or as late as next year. Even if the amounts were known in August
2003 that could be too late to incorporate them into the FY 2004 City budget process. Due
to the uncertainty of the funding amounts, it is recommended that the following proposals
be implemented to offset any reduction in funding.
• Proposal One
In November 2001 the number of buses on the street during the midday
hours was reduced from twelve to nine. The impact of this service
reduction was a loss in ridership of approximately 296,000. This loss in
ridership was reflected in a reduction in fare box revenue.
Recommendation One
The estimated cost to resume midday service is $196,600 with an
To: Kyle Hayes
From: Tom Warner
RE: Proposed FY 2004
Transit Budget
June 23,2003
Page 3 of 4
estimated increase in revenue of $222,300, based on the current fare
structure.
The implementation of this recommendation would result in a net revenue
increase of $24,700. It is not known at this time if ridership can be
increased to 2001 levels. However, if only 85 percent of the ridership
lost returned to use BMT, this would result in a breakeven proposal.
• Proposal Two
The cost to provide a reliable and efficient transit system has continued
to increase while federal and state funding has decreased. The only
alternative to replace this loss in revenue is to raise fares. Prior to the
November 2001 fare increase, the last fare increase occurred in 1997.
Recommendation Two
The following fare schedule is recommended to become effective
October 1, 2003.
Current Proposed
Fare Type Fare Fare
Adult $ 1.00 $ 1.25
Youth 0.50 0.75
Monthly Pass 30.00 40.00
STS 2.00 2.50
STS ( Fully NA 20.00
Allocated Cost)**
Transfers Free 0.25
** The City's interpretation of the Federal regulations allows a transit
system to charge social service agencies the difference between
the complementary STS fare and the full allocated cost of the
trip. A local agency disagrees with this interpretation and the
City has been unable to get a written opinion from the FTA. The
difference between the fares is $17.50. This issue was
previously considered during the FY 2002 Budget preparations.
Enclosed is a memo explaining the issue in greater detail.
The resumption of midday service and the implementation of the fare increase is
anticipated to generate an additional revenue of$24,700 and$349,300, respectively. Of
To: Kyle Hayes
From: Tom Warner
RE: Proposed FY 2004
Transit Budget
June 23, 2003
Page 4 of 4
the revenue generated from fare increases, $175,000 is from charging the fully allocated
fare to social service agencies. It is anticipated that the revenue generated will be
sufficient to offset the loss in federal and/or state revenue. However, if funding is
reduced more than$370,000 service reductions such as elimination of late night service
may have to be considered.
Tom Warner
TW:sk
1�
CITY OF BEAUMONT
PUBLIC WORKS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
� c
October 24, 2001
TO: Stephen J. Bonczek, City Manager
FROM: Tom Warner, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL TRANSIT
COMMENTS
The Fiscal Year 2002 Budget for Beaumont Municipal Transit (BMT) included fare
increases for the fixed route system and Special Transit Service (STS). The fare
increases also included a provision to charge social service agencies the difference
between the complementary STS fare and the fully allocated cost of a trip for
transporting clients to the social service agency. The cost difference between the
complementary STS fare and the fully allocated cost is $13 per trip.
During the October 23 City Council meeting, Mr. Gary Hidalgo with Spindletop
MHMR addressed City Council concerning the cost impact to the agency for
transporting their clients under the new fare structure. Currently, BMT transports
nineteen(19) Spindletop MHMR clients to the agency on a regular basis. They have
estimated the cost to the agency at $110,000.
Also, Mr. Hidalgo questions the ability of the City to charge these costs to social
service agencies based on his interpretation of the guidelines. Included in his
presentation was- a reference to a section from the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) ADA Paratransit Handbook. The section of the FTA ADA Paratransit
Handbook he referred to states:
Informal referrals by human service agency staff should not,however,
be treated the same as contract services. For example, a request for
service might be made by an agency on behalf of an eligible rider with
a cognitive or communication disability. In this case, the
complementary paratransit service fare must be used.
Based on this section of the handbook, Spindletop MHMR does not believe that they
should be charged the difference between the complementary STS fare and the fully
To: Stephen J. Bonczek
From: Tom Warner
RE: Beaumont Municipal Transit
October 24,2001
Page 2 of 2
allocated cost of transporting their clients to the agency. We assume that they consider
their relationship with BMT to be that of simply making "informal referrals."
In order to use the STS system, eligible passengers either are on the advanced
reservation list or must call in to have their trip scheduled. To be considered for the
advanced reservation list, the destination of the STS passenger and the scheduled
pickup time must be the same for a minimum of three (3) times a week. The federal
regulations allow up to fifty (50) percent of the system capacity to be set aside for
advanced reservations. The nineteen (19) MHMR clients currently using the STS
service are on the advanced reservation list.
Passengers who call in are scheduled based on a first come-first served basis.
Although every effort is made to meet the pickup time requested, system use dictates
when and if space is available. However, a passenger on the advanced reservation list
is guaranteed that service will be available at the time requested.
The rules and regulations concerning higher fares for social service agencies were
published in the Federal Register on September 6, 1991. The FTA regulations state:
(4) The entity may charge a fare higher than otherwise permitted
by this paragraph to a social service agency or other
organization for agency trips (i.e.. trips guaranteed to the
organization).
An opinion from the Legal Department was requested concerning the ability of the
BMT to charge the higher fare to social service agencies. Based on the current
operating procedures of placing the social service agency's clients on the advanced
reservation list, BMT is guaranteeing trips to an organization, in this case Spindletop
MHMR and may charge the higher fare. Representatives of the FTA were contacted
regarding this matter and they have indicated no problem with the fee proposal.
In short, some agency will subsidize thesc trips and we believe it is more properly the
social service agency since they have significant assets allocated to transportation of
their clients.
I
Tom Warner
TW:sk
City 0 Beaumont
REGULAR MEETING GE THE CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 1, 2003 Ia30 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of minutes
' Confirmation of committee appointments
Marie Broussard would be reappointed to the Historical Landmark Commission. The current
term would expire May 1, 2005. (Mayor Evelyn M. Lord)
Ed Edson, III would be appointed to the Darks and Recreation.Advisory Committee. His term
would commence July 1, 2003 and expire June 30, 2005. (Councilmember Lulu Smith)
A) Approve a resolution to allow Hibernia Bank to release a security as collateral for City
accounts and pledge an additional security to replace it
B) Approve the payment of an invoice for aircraft repairs
C) Authorize a release of weed liens against four properties
D) Authorize the acceptance of a water line easement providing access for fire prevention
services
City of Beaumont
u Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kandy Daniel, Treasurer
MEETING DATE: July 1, 2003
AGENDA MEMO DATE: June 25, 2003
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution to allow Hibernia National Bank to
release the following security as collateral for City accounts which is held at the Federal Reserve
Bank, effective June 24, 2003 and pledge an additional security to replace it.
Cugp No. Description Face Value Market Value
RELEASE:
31382LPL4 FNMA, 6.504%, Due 11/01/28 $1,000,000.00 $ 310,035.06
PLEDGE:
31371K4B4 FNMA, 5.00%, Due 04/01/13 $1,000,000.00 $ 980,990.57
RECOMMENDATION
The administration requests approval of a resolution to pledge and release the above listed securities
covering City deposits at Hibernia National Bank.
BACKGROUND
The City of Beaumont maintained uncollected ledger balances at Hibernia National Bank in the
amount of$2,201,579.27 on June 24, 2003. After pledging and releasing the above securities, the
market value of pledged collateral totals$5,247,087.04 and along with FDIC coverage is sufficient
to collateralize current deposits as well as any deposits anticipated in the near future.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
Council approved a release of collateral by Hibernia National Bank with a market value of
$1,000,000.00 on April 2, 2002.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
Subsequent Council action will be requested to pledge or release additional collateral when
appropriate.
RECOMMENDED BY
Finance Officer and Treasurer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny resolution to allow Hibernia National Bank to pledge and release the following
securities as collateral for City accounts which is held at the Federal Reserve Bank,effective June 24,
2003.
Cusp No. Description Face Value Market Value
RELEASE:
31382LPL4 FNMA, 6.504%, Due 11/01/28 $1,000,000.00 $ 310,035.06
PLEDGE:
31371K4B4 FNMA, 5.00°/x, Due 04/01/13 $1,000,000.00 $ 980,990.57
B
City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Central Services Director
MEETING DATE: July 1, 2003
AGENDA MEMO DATE: June 26, 2003
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider the payment of an invoice for aircraft repairs.
RECOMMENDATION
Administration recommends the payment of an invoice in the amount of$24,927.51 to Gafford Aero,
Inc. of San Marcos, Texas.
BACKGROUND
The Police Department's 1979 Cessna 210 airplane was flown to Gafford Aero, Inc., located at the
San Marcos Municipal Airport, in April for its required Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
annual inspection and maintenance overhaul.
Gafford provided a preliminary estimate of the cost of labor and parts for items to be repaired or
replaced prior to the required FAA annual inspection. Based on a partial dismantling of the plane,
the repair estimate for parts and labor was$27,373.45. Prior to the commencement ofwork,Gafford
required a partial payment of$13,686.73 which was made April 29, 2003.
The engine and propeller were repaired to like new condition and routine maintenance was performed
to Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) standards. The plane was scheduled to be picked up by
City Staff on June 6 upon certification of the final test flight. The total cost of repairs was
$38,614.24.
On June 2,2003, a storm with winds in excess of 80 m.p.h. struck the San Marcos Municipal Airport
destroying the City's plane. According to the City Attorney, it does not appear that either San
Marcos Municipal Airport or Gafford Aero, Inc. has insurance coverage or legal responsibility for
events beyond their control. The City is self insured and also does not purchase insurance coverage
for aircraft losses.
Payment- Gafford Aero,Inc.
June 27, 2003
Page 2
The payment of the invoice is due as the work was completed prior to the plane's destruction. To
offset some of this cost,the plane's engine,propeller, cylinder, and avionics have a salvage value of
$35,000-$40,000.
Bids were not required as the cost of repairs were unknown at the time plane was delivered to
Gafford Aero. The extent ofrepairs could not be determined until the plane's engine was dismantled.
State law exempts entities from competitive bidding requirements for unforseen damages to
machinery. In addition,local aircraft mechanics,maintaining the plane since 1997,referred the Police
Department to Gafford Aero due to the extensive repairs that the plane needed.
The City obtained the aircraft in 1988 from the Federal Government. It has been used by the Police
Department in various crime investigations and for travel to various schools and seminars. The plane
will be disposed of according to the Federal guidelines for property disposal. The total value of the
plane was $170,000.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
Funds are available in the Confiscated Goods Fund for this expenditure.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Central Services Director and Chief of Police.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve/Deny the payment of an invoice in the amount of$38,614.24 less a partial payment in the
amount of$13,686.73 for a total of$24,927.51.
City of Beaumont
� c
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kandy Daniel, Treasurer
MEETING DATE: July 1, 2003
AGENDA MEMO DATE: June 25, 2003
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing a release of weed liens
against four(4) properties described as:
1. D 19 T 9A 687 AC A Willians A CR FR, 4325 Magnolia
2. D 19 T 9A A Williams, 4296 Magnolia
3. Tract 9 4 42 100 AC D 19 A Williams
4. Lot 1 Block 1 Sun Acres Dir. Behind 1815 Parry
RECOMMENDATION
The administration requests approval of a resolution authorizing a release of weed liens against four
(4)properties described above.
BACKGROUND
The properties described above currently have five(5)weed liens totaling$610.93 which represents
$212.50 in principal and $398.43 in interest and fees. Dr. Adam Smith of the Greater Little Zion
Church of God in Christ has requested that all charges be waived and that the liens which are dated
1979 through 1982 be released to provide an unencumbered title to the property. Debbie Rieley
inherited these properties from her father William P. Terrell and plans to donate the properties to the
church as she is unable to pay the liens or keep up the property. The church plans to clean up the
property which will aid in the revitalization of the neighborhood.
BUDGETARYIMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager and Finance Officer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny a resolution authorizing a release of weed liens against four(4)properties described
as:
1. D 19 T 9A 687 AC A Willians A CR FR, 4325 Magnolia
2. D 19 T 9A A Williams, 4296 Magnolia
3. Tract 9 4 42 140 AC D 19 A Williams
4. Lot 1 Block 1 Sun Acres Dir. Behind 1815 Parry
.cavED JUN 212003
m��L�L�rly Iftb m A'e iYelcorne You
To Holiness! 51WAdev&(T U5 d (66� k (TWO s6z
WJAy�. sntit�i•,
51wndelp
TUOV CqeriaUSe. SM&k, sv,
&UmIn"tzataw,Mss&&wt,
June 20, 2003
Candy Daniels
City of Beaumont Treasurer's Office
P. O. Box 3827
Beaumont, TX 77704
Attention Candy Daniels,
Greeting in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Praying that this communication will find all in God's
care.
We are submitting this communication, in an effort to resolve a matter linked between Property Owners
and the City of Beaumont. Please find a reference listed below:
Name Principle Interest Fees Total Legal Description
Terrell William P $55.00 110.22 3.00 $168.22 D 19 T 9A 687 AC A WMS 4325 Magnolia
Terrell W P $55.00 99.68 3.00 $157.68 D 19 T 9A A Williams 4296 Magnolia
Terrell WM.Burroughs J $23.75 40.26 3.00 $67.01 Tract 9 4 42 100 AC D 19 A Williams
Terrell Wm.P Burroughs $7835 133.27 6.00 $218.02 Lot 1 Block 1 SUN ACRES Dir.behind 1815 Parry
We are simply requesting a "Forgiveness/void" of the above listed "Weed Liens & Abatement. " The
current owners are prepared to submit and record a General Warranty Gift Deed for this property to be
gifted to the Greater Little Zion Church of God in Christ. The forgiveness will result in a smoother
transfer of this gift with no prior outstanding indebtedness.
Our plans are apart of the needed components for future expansion surrounding our property. Our top
priority will be the demolishing of the (Old Car Wash) structure at 4325 Magnolia Avenue (D19 T 9A)
and the cleaning up of that property for current/future overflow parking. It is just a small revitalization
effort in the best interest of our community.
The absence of this non-operable "ill-social magnet" structure will potentially diminish unsafe
environments for our parishioners, as it will potentially enhance the attitudes of surrounding residents.
This improvement alone can and will upgrade the general neighborhood physical appearance. And we
feel that this will contribute to a `positive image"throughout our neighborhood/community and city.
QD 4296 Magnolia Avenue Beaumont,TX 77703 W(409)835-6564
El 5095 Ada Avenue Beaumont,TX.77708-4410 W(409)898-4464
In closing, we express our sincerest concerns for safety, improvement and a positive image for this
general neighborhood. Thanks in advance for your sincerest consideration, help and support. Praying for
the continued Divine Providence of the Almighty God.
Respectfully submitted,
Greater Little Zion
Church of God in Christ
Trustee Board
Dr. Adam Smith,
Founder&Pastor
Enc: 4
cc: Beaumont City Council
D
Vow City of Beaumont
Council Agenda Item
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Joris P. Colbert, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: July 1, 2003
AGENDA MEMO DATE: June 23, 2003
REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a water
line easement providing access for fire prevention services.
RECOMMENDATION
Magnolia Enterprise Partners, LTD. has agreed to convey a ten foot (10') wide water line
easement to the City of Beaumont. The easement is described as being a 0.1545 acre tract out of
the Wesley B. Dyches Survey, Abstract 17, and is located across Magnolia Enterprise's property
at 10295 Eastex Freeway [previously Girl's Haven]. This easement will provide mandatory
access for fire prevention services.
Administration recommends acceptance of the easement.
BACKGROUND
The easement is to be used to provide exclusive access to the water lines and fire hydrants for the
property named above. It would also allow for the construction, alteration, operation and
maintenance of the said water lines and appurtenances.
BUDGETARY IMPACT
None.
PREVIOUS ACTION
None.
SUBSEQUENT ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED BY
City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Approve/Deny a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a water line easement providing access
for fire prevention services.
fire_10295eastex-ib.wpd
June 13,2003
SUBJECT
10' WATER LINE EASEMENT D v��z W BRGAD GAK
96
- - TRAM �
0.1545 ACRE OUT OF o Rsu„g� 69
> BYT
WESLEY B. DYCHES SURVEY
ABSTRACT 17 L•vIS
DNST
CLICK
w SCOTT'
o HURLEY
N
m
(10295 EASTEX FREEWAY) 9 d EY
O w G PINEY
64 a
O a iyc D
HIDDEN
NOODE
CRKVALLE w
LEAS NT ST
BEND
GUESS 9
OWNER: MAGNOLIA ENTERPRISE _ JODY CHINN SF 9F
PARTNERS, LTD. _ NCH NN INN F Q t
�J r RI H RD O f �<; R
)yJl 3 z z z z NG
LC,CATI[IN MAP
LEGEND N.T.S,
® SUBJECT PROPERTY
I-I-I-I-I °
� + a
10' WATER x
+�1 LINE EASEMENT
1
d J►
1 0,1545 ACRES
VA
it
+
+r+
'J
N,T,S
EXHIBIT `BAs'