Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 10 HHHR E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont has heretofore ordered the improvement of Blossom Drive, Parish Street, and Procter Street from Washington Boulevard South through Blocks 1-5 in the Fleetwood Addition; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has delcared their intention to assess a part of the cost to such improvements against the abutting property owners thereof; and, WHEREAS, on October 23, 1973, the City of Beaumont re- ceived bids for construction of Blossom Drive, Parish Street, and Procter Street as described herein and, WHEREAS, Gulf Coast Industrial. -Contractors, Inc., sub- mitted a bid in the sum of One Hundred Fifty -One Thousand One Hundred Eighty -Four and 55/100 ($151,184.55) Dollars, with 160 working days to complete the project based.on their alternate bid; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the bid submitted by Gulf Coast Industrial Contractors is the lowest and best bid and should be accepted and a contract entered into with Gulf Coast Industrial Contractors for the construction of Blossom Drive, Parish Street, and Procter Street as described herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: THAT the bid of Gulf Coast Industrial Contractors be accepted and the City Manager be, and he is hereby authorized, to execute on behalf of the City of Beaumont, a contract with Gulf Coast Industrial Contractors, Inc. for the construction of Blossom South through Blocks 1 -5 -in the Fleetwood Addition with 160 work- ing days to complete th,e work at a contract price of $151,184.55 based on their alternate bid; and the City Clerk is'hereby autho- rized to attest to said contract and to affix the seal of the City of Beaumont thereto. And it is further resolved by the City Coun- cil of the City of Beaumont that the City Council hereby -approves and adopts the Assessment -Paving Roll,of the Assessment -Paving Project on Blossom Drive, Parish Street and Procter Street as de- scribed herein, said Paving -Assessment Roll being as follows: BLOSSOM DR: -PARISH -PROCTER STS From WASHINGTON BOULEVARD - SOUTH To THROUGH BLOCKS 1-5 INCLUSIVE FLEETWOOD ADDITION Pavement 26 ft. wide reinforced concrete- Property oncrete-Property Owner's Cost $6.00 Per Front Foot Front' Property Owner's Cost Pro erty Owner Lot lBlk. Feet Total Amount $6.00/ft, $10.00/ft. BLOSSOM DRIVE FLEETWO D ADDITION I West Side i Geo. 0. Hudspeth 19 &.S i 1/2 of 18 2 84.6 $ 507.60• $ 846.00 Alvin L. Daniels 7 & N 1/2 of 8 2 85.0 510.00 850.00 Maurice J. Simpson 15-16 & S 1/2 of 14 2 125.0 750.00 1,250.00 H. A. Clifton 12-13 & N 1/2 of 14 2 125.0 750.00 1,250.00 i ,L. L. Lowry 11 2 60..0 360.00. 600.00 S. N. Wallace 9-10 & S •15' of 8 2 115.0 690..0,0 1,150.00 'Johnny M. Smith S 1/2 of 7 & N 35' of 8 2 60.0 360.00 600.00 James A. Darden 6 & N 1/2 of 7 2 75.0 450.00 750.0'0 Edward P. Pierre 3-4 & 5 2 150.0 900.00 1,500.00 Chas. A. "Bubba" Smith 1'& 2 2 100.0 600.00 1,000.00 J. SCH RBAUR ADDIT ON. Calvin Williams Tr. B ou of 3 113.88 683.28 71.13R_Rn PRELIMINARY PAVING ASSESSMENT BLOSSOM DR. -PARISH -PROCTER STS From WASHINGTON BOULEVARD - SOUTH To THROUGH BLOCKS 1-5 INCLUSIVE FLEETWOOD ADDITION Pavement 26 ft. wide reinforced concrete Property Owner's Cost1 $6.00 -Per Front Foot Form PW--RSPA-4 Front Property Owner's Cost Pro erty Owner Lot Blk. Feet Total Amount $6.00/ft. $10.00/ft. BLOSSOM DRIVE (Cont.) J. SCA ROUGH ADDITION Christ Sanctified Church Tract C oat of3 100.0 $ 600.00 $ 1,000.00 Harold E. Brown Tract Ao of 3 13.8E 83.28 138.80 FLEETW OD.ADDITION Harold E. Brown 1 & N 1/2 of 2 1. 75.0 4.50.00 750.00 Julia. M. Levy 3 & S 1/2 of.2 1 75.0 450.00 750.00 Aaron Green, et ux 4 & N 1/2 of 5 .1 75.0 450.00 750.00 Alvin G. Randolph 6 & S,1/2 of 5 1. 75.0 450.00 750.00 aWhitney J. Green 7 & N 1/2 of 8 11 75.0 450.00 750.00 A. G. Randolph 9-10 & S 1/2 of ,8 1 125.0 750.00 1,250.00 Joseph.Simon, Jr. 12 & 13 1 100.0 600.00 1,000.00 T. R. Johns 14 & N40' of 15• 1 90.0 540.00 900.00 iLeslie James Hunt 16 & S10' of 15 1 60.0' 360.00 600.00 ,Geo. E. Randle I 18 & 19 1 10,8.34 650.04 1;083.40 Form PW--RSPA-4 PRELIMINARY PAVING ASSESSMENT BLOSSOM DR. -PARISH -PROCTER STS.F rom WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ToTHROUGH BLOCKS 1-5 INCLUSIVE FLEETWOOD ADDITION Pavement 26 ft. wide reinforced concrete Property Owner's Cost' $6.00 Per Front Foot Front Property Owner's Cost Pro erty Owner Lot Blk. Feet Total Amount $6.00/ft, $10.00/ft. PROCTER STREET FLEETWOOD ADDITION South Side Geo. E. Randle 18 1 111.77 * $ 670.63 $ 1,117.70. C. Julius Mosest et ux 1 & W 45' of 2 5 105.16 630.96 1,051.60 0. J. Jenkins '3-4 & E 10' of 2 5 120.0 720.00 1,200.00 Alvin G.'Randolph 5 5 55.0 330.00 550.00 A. G. Randolph 6 5 75.9 455.40 759.00 North Side A. G. Randolph 7 4 52.9 317.40 529.00 William L. Beckett 5 & 6 4 103.3 619.80 1,033.00 L. C. Clark 4 & E 1/2 of 3 4 75.0 450.00 750.00 J. W. Samuel 2 & W 1/2 of 3 4 75.0 450.00 750.00 Alvin G. Randolph 1 4 50.15 300.90 501.50 Leslie James Hunt 16 1 111.78 * 670.68 1,117.80 PARISH STREET South Side Joseph Simon, Jr. 12 1 111.78* 670.68 1,117.80 Joe Simon 144 50.15 300.90 501.50 'harles R. Anderson 12 .13 4 100.0 600.00 1,000.00;. Bobbie Armstrong i 0 & 11 4 100.0 .600.00 1,000.00 Acy Graham, Jr. 8 & 9 4 107.0 642.00 1,070.00 Form.PW-RSPA-4 PRELIMINARY PAVING ASSESSMENT BLOSSOM DR. -PARISH -PROCTER STSF ro m WASHINGTON BOULEVARD -SOUTH To THROUGH BLOCKS 1-5 INCLUSIVE Pavement 26 ft. wide reinforced concrete Property Owner's Cost $6.00 Per Front Foot Form PW-RSPA-4 The City Council of the City of Beaumont further orders Property Owner Lot Blk. Front Feet-. Property Owner's Cost Total Amount $6.00/ft. $10.00/ft. PARISH STREET North Side A. G. Randolph 7 3 53.8 $ 322.80 $ 538.00 Ernest L. Hamilton 5 & E 1/2 of 5 3 78.3 469.80 783.00' Ledor Coleman & W 1/2, 3 75.0 450.00 750.00 , Golden J. Hardy, Jr. X23 3 100.0 600.00 1,000.00 l Barbara Joseph 3 50.14 300.84 501.40 A. G. Randolph 10 1 111.79* 670.73 1,117.90 4,139.62• $24,837.72 $ 41,396.2.0 Total Property Owners' Costa $6.00 Ra e $ 24,837.72 Total Property Owners' Costa $10.00 to 41,396.20 Total Estimated City's Cost if Property Owner.,' Rate $6.00 100,162.28 Total Estimated City's Cost if Property Owner,' Rate i $10.00 .83,603.80 i Total Estimated Cost of Improv ments • $ 125;000.b0• .i i Form PW-RSPA-4 The City Council of the City of Beaumont further orders P that a hearing be had and the hearing shall be had. and held by and before the City Council of the City of Beaumont at 10:00 A. M. on Tuesday, December 4,.1973, in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall of and in said City, at which time and place all owing any property.abutting upon said portion of said street, or any interest therein, shall have the right at such hearing to be heard on any matter as to which hearing is a constitutional pre- requisite to the validity.of any assessment authorized by Article 1105-b, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, and to contest the amounts of the proposed assessments, the lien and liability there- fore, special benefits to the abutting property and the owners thereof by means of the improvements for which assessments are to be levied, the accuracy, sufficiency, regularity, and validity of the proceedings and contract in connection with such improve- ment and proposed assessments. Following such hearing as above provided for, assessments will be levied against such abutting property and the real and true owners thereof for that portion of the costs of said improvements hereinabove determined to be payable by said abutting property and the real and true owners thereof, in the respective amounts as shall be determined at said hearing, and such assessments, when levied, shall be a first and prior lien against such abutting property from the date said im- provements were ordered, and shall be a personal liability and charge against the true owner of such property at said date, whe- ther named or not. In levying said assessments, if the name of any owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to state the fact, and if any said abutting property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of any owner, and no error or mistake in attempting to name any such owner or in describing any of said property shall invalidate any assessments or certificate issued in evidence thereof, but never- theless, the real and true owner of said abutting property shall be liable and the assessments against said property shall be valid whether or not such owner be correctly named. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of such hearing, which notice shall be directed to all owning any property abutting upon said portion of said street and.to all claiming any such property or any interest therein, and to all interested in any such property, and shall be given by advertisement hereof inserted at least three (3) times in some newspaper published in the City of Beaumont, the first publication to be made at least twenty- one (21) days before the date of the hearing. The City Clerk will also mail by certified mail a copy or a substantial copy of the notice so published or to be so published, addressed to the respective owners of the various parcels or lots of abutting property, together with lienholders, at their respective usual or best mailing addresses; provided, in complying with this direction for the giving of notice by mail to the abutting pro- perty owners and lienholders, the City Clerk may rely upon -and may address the envelopes containing such notices, in accordance with such list of names and addresses as may be furnished the City Clerk as being sufficient and correct. The City Clerk shall mail such notices as soon as practicable after the receipt by her of such list of names and addresses and shall in such manner and form as she deems appropriate and sufficient make and preserve a record sufficient to evidence the following: A. The fact and date of the mailing thereof with a sufficient description of the paving project -to which the notices so mailed related; and, B. The names and mailing addresses to which the notices so mailed were addressed. The City Clerk shall, in any event, mail said notices at least fourteen (14) days prior to the benefit hearing set herein. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the f�T day of 1973. Offil c or