The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET JAN 07 2003 .Z L City of Beaumont SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 7,2003 1:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER * Roll Call EXECUTIVE SESSION * Consider matters related to employment, evaluation and duties of a public officer or employee in accordance with Section 551.074 of the Government Code: Consider the appointment of a City Magistrate Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 880-3725 a day prior to the meeting. � W � , ' ' L City of Beaumont REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 7,2003 1:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER * Invocation Pledge Roll Call * Presentations and Recognition * Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items 1,5 &6/Consent Agenda * Consent Agenda GENERAL BUSINESS 1. Consider appointing a Chief Magistrate to a two-year term 2. Consider a request for an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at 18''' Street 3. Consider a request to abandon the 20'alley in Block 3 of North Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and 111-10 and Catalpa Avenue 4. Consider the re-adoption of the Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its accompanying "Development Strategies Plan"and re-adoption of the Major Street&Highway Plan"Map"and accompanying"Appendix A"defining street and highway development standards of the plan, all of which are components of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont 5. Consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for the Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements 6. Consider approval of a contract with BUILD, Inc., Beaumont Main Street COMMENTS * Councilmembers/City Manager comment on various matters * Public Comment (Persons are limited to 3 minutes) RECESS OF REGULAR MEETING CONVENE MEETING OF THE BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION 1. Consider a resolution authorizing the donation of funds to the City of Beaumont in the amount of$15,497.51 to be used for educational purposes at Beaumont Public Libraries EXECUTIVE SESSION * Consider matters related to contemplated or pending litigation in accordance with Section 551.071 of the Government Code: Claim of Debra Matthews Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 880-3725 a day prior to the meeting. 1 January 7,2003 Consider appointing a Chief Magistrate to a two-year term ...N. C 0 it of Beaumont y •�• Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kyle Hayes, City Manager MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: January 3, 2003 REQUESTED ACTION: Consider appointing a City Magistrate to a two-year term. RECOMMENDATION The City Council will meet in Executive Session on January 7,2003 and recommend the appointment of a City Magistrate. BACKGROUND The City Charter states "there shall be one or more magistrates of said Municipal Court known as City Magistrates, one of whom shall be designed Chief Magistrate." James D. McNicholas was designated the Chief Magistrate on November 12, 2002. City Magistrate Theodore Johns and the newly appointed City Magistrate will receive compensation of$250 per session. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Council. RECOMMENDED MOTION Approve/Deny appointing a City Magistrate to a two-year term. 2 January 7,2003 Consider a request for an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at 18th Street City o f Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: December 18, 2002 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at 18th Street. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at W, Street, subject to an 8' tall screening fence along the south and east sides of the property,the planting of shrubs along the edge of the five parking spaces on the north side of the parking lot and installation of the drainage improvements recommended by Mark Whiteley&Associates, including the installation of a surface inlet at 18th and North,the installation of an underground pipe connecting the proposed inlet to the existing inlet, and the straightening and grading of the ditch. BACKGROUND City Council approved a specific use permit to allow a 10 space parking lot for a dental office in July, 2001. However, when the lot was built, another 5 spaces were constructed for a total of 15 spaces. The subject property is located at 3395 North Street. Staff contacted the applicant that an amended specific use permit would be required. The original specific use permit was approved subject to an 8'tall wood screening fence being constructed along the south and east sides of the property. At the November 18,2002 Joint Hearing,this item was tabled because of concern over whether the new parking lot was causing flooding on the neighboring property to the east. BUDGETARYIMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a joint Public Hearing with City Council held November 18, 2002, the Planning Commission voted 6:0 to table the request for an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at 18'1i Street until the December 16, 2002 joint Public Hearing. At a joint Public Hearing with City Council held December 16, 2002, the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at 18t1i Street,subject to an 8'tall screening fence along the south and east sides of the property,the planting of shrubs along the edge of the five parking spaces on the north side of the parking lot and installation of the drainage improvements recommended by Mark Whiteley&Associates, including the installation of a surface inlet at 18'h and North,the installation of an underground pipe connecting the proposed inlet to the existing inlet,and the straightening and grading of the ditch. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. RECOMMENDED MOTION Approve/Deny an amended specific use permit to allow the expansion of overflow parking for a dental office at 3395 North Street at 18'h Street, subject to an 8'tall screening fence along the south and east sides of the property,the planting of shrubs along the edge of the five parking spaces on the north side of the parking lot and installation of the drainage improvements recommended by Mark Whiteley&Associates, including the installation of a surface inlet at 18'h and North,the installation of an underground pipe connecting the proposed inlet to the existing inlet,and the straightening and grading of the ditch. ORDINANCE NO. ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01- 054, TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF OVERFLOW PARKING FORA DENTAL OFFICE IN AN AREAZONED RM- H (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING-HIGHEST DENSITY) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 3395 NORTH STREET AT 18TH STREET; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: THAT Ordinance 01-054 passed on July 24, 2001 by the City Council of the City of Beaumont is hereby amended as follows: Section 1. That a specific use permit to allow a 10-space parking lot for a dental office in an RM-H(Residential Multiple Family Dwelling-Highest Density)District located at 3395 North Street at 18" Street, being the W. 5' of Lot 8 and Lots 9-12, Block 7, Jarrett Addition, City of Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, containing 0.34 acres, more or less, as shown on Exhibit"A' attached hereto, is hereby granted to Richard M. McCardell, Andy B. Duke and David D. Reynard, their legal representatives, successors and assigns, subject to the following conditions: • Install an 8'tall screening fence along the south and east sides of the property; • Plant shrubs along the edge of the five parking spaces on the north side of the parking lot; • Install the drainage improvements recommended by Mark Whiteley &Associates, the owner's engineer, including: -J Install a surface inlet at 18th Street and North; and =J Install an underground pipe connecting the proposed inlet to the existing inlet; and =D Straighten and grade the ditch. Section 2. That the specific use permit herein granted is expressly issued for and in accordance with each particular and detail of the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof for all purposes. Section 3. Notwithstanding the site plan attached hereto, the use of the property hereinabove described shall be in all other respects subject to all of the applicable regulations contained in Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of Beaumont, Texas, as amended. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 7th day of January, 2003. - Mayor Evelyn M. Lord - nI I_ N I 1 w - l FILE 1646-P: Request for an ammended specific use permit to allow the expansion of NORTH overflow parking for a dental office. Location: 3395 North St. at 18th St. Applicant: Mark Whiteley & Associates, Inc. SCALE 1" 200' w • I ' It• ryy� lf.id ago 7[� ij � w w IO ti c 1 O::s y GC - + H ARRISOM A AM ,.Q •111 -. • � HARRISON AVE. 3,,l27 1 411 to I � -.�SCX7 pCt7 R - - - . .. . � .I I ... At ADMINISTRATIVE :;A +� C9 N • _ Yf OFFICES Qt � ° '� PLANETARIUM 3• � •"$ - PLANE p Z �— ----13 to LU -- r�=-- • sr- Z ' w n + 1 r al.• 35Q7 NORTH ST. •� .q 10 6 19 • . EXHIBIT "A" McFADDEN AVENUE o t"f'aon - 00 M �n H M_ for If to 19 for 140 to 13 _ T WN NOM S w so•�- i oNc —ptt ff0.0f'— ti2—C pC CYL IP! RO M!!!�Iti Ifal�l' UPC 1 rot.`4rW Of SOS C6^" Approval subject to an 8'tall screening fence along the south and east sides of the property,the planting p of shrubs along the edge of the five parking spaces on 8 g P g P in ; ,L. the north side of the parking lot and installation of the mom. drainage improvements recommended by Mark Whiteley &Associates, including the installation of a surface inlet •. » ,� 4 j !; r;, i ';" at 18"and North, the installation of an underground pipe connecting the proposed inlet to the existing inlet and the 5 !' straightening and grading of the ditch. g rf.fl ' r I 1T ta' aar otrc I I 0 g Is to to 2 g owmx 1.0 Ig E r of Wf of -'I 20' ( I� NARK M. MHITELEY "la's�'M c►«c I AND ASSOCIATES W` 1� I I W. 51 of LOT 14 & INCORPORATED q/1 of LOTS 9. 10 11 & 12 coNSUL e�+c�NSSRS. I I BLOC=X I SURMORS. AND Pu►MM "xa ra .,f � m I I I o�c I P a Box 34" 32nD[ASr"nqw. I I 8CVAaNr. rrxaS 777Ya-3412 forl rr>�s Yn .of-aft-our r'Ax) .af-aft-IS•i ?7" raw rw ss000bat 1,. no"Mmt 1MOV AMENDED M" °°• '°�°°" ^T. SPECIFIC USE r. Ptn Pur NORTH STREET PERMIT FOR �°° 3395 NORTH STREET 3 January 7, 2003 Consider a request to abandon the 20'alley in Block 3 ofNorth Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and IH-10 and Catalpa Avenue City of Beaumont UE Council Agenda Item g TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: December 18, 2002 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request to abandon the 20'alley in Block 3 of North Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and IH-10 and Catalpa Avenue. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of the request to abandon the 20'alley in Block 3 ofNorth Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and IH-10 and Catalpa Avenue. BACKGROUND Mt. Gilead Missionary Baptist Church is planning to expand its church facility at 710 IH-I OR As a result of the expansion, additional parking is needed. The subject block will be developed as a parking lot, therefore the need for the abandonment of the alley. The request was sent to all interested parties. No negative responses have been received. BUDGETARYIMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Regular Meeting held December 16,2002,the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve the abandonment of the 20'alley in Block 3 of North Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and IH-10 and Catalpa Avenue. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. RECOMMENDED MOTION Approve/Deny a request to abandon the 20'alley in Block 3 ofNorth Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and IH-10 and Catalpa Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING THE 20' ALLEY IN BLOCK 3 OF NORTH ADDITION LOCATED BETWEEN TEXAS AND GRAND AVENUE AND IH-10 AND CATALPA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF. BEAUMONT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: THAT the 20' alley in Block 3 of North Addition located between Texas and Grand Avenue and IH-10 and Catalpa Avenue as shown below and on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, be and the same is hereby vacated and abandoned: Being the 20' x 200' alley right-of-way in Block 3, North Addition, said alley lying between Catalpa Avenue and IH-10E, being east of Lots 4-6 and west of Lots 7-10, Block 3, North Addition, containing 0.091 acres, more or less. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 7th day of January, 2003. - Mayor Evelyn M. Lord - 'ST. L File 641-OB: Request to abandon the 20' alley in block 3 of the North Addition. NOR? Location: Between Texas and Grand Avenue and Interstate 10 and Catalpa Avenue. Applicant: Fittz and Shipman,Inc. SCAT 1"=2C r- yW . s - ' •A D L ` w � ,a t PfA H I AYE ui S PEACH AVE. Rio II �: so 0 o W 0 J V t t � .7 • e l ! t A p z Q �' vo .°.CATALPA AMr W 11 401) s CATALPA AVE. �' = J� 46 J1. 3L da I ', . g� 7d0 • �• t M SUBJE ' as o /IV ATE �^ • 0 ° g ' �I. lar LOUISIANA AVE. t •t 4 • �iSLAM AVE a eo GLADYS AVE. 10 '- EXHIBIT "A" ' � � /9 • ! f I nn - i t�s • V 4 January 7,2003 Consider the re-adoption of the Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its accompanying"Development Strategies Plan"and re-adoption of the Major Street&Highway Plan "Map"and accompanying"Appendix A"defining street and highway development standards of the plan, all of which are components of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: December 18, 2002 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider the re-adoption,with no significant modifications, of the currently adopted Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its accompanying "Development Strategies Plan"and re-adoption,with no significant modifications,of the currently adopted Major Street&Highway Plan"Map"and accompanying"Appendix A"defining street and highway development standards of the plan,all ofwhich are components ofthe Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of the re-adoption,with no significant modifications,of the currently adopted Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its accompanying "Development Strategies Plan"and re-adoption,with no significant modifications,of the currently adopted Major Street&Highway Plan"Map"and accompanying"Appendix A"defining street and highway development standards of the plan,all of which are components of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont. BACKGROUND The re-adoption of the Land Use Plan Element and its accompanying "Development Strategies Diagram" and the Major Street and Highway Plan including its accompanying "Appendix A" defining the development standards of the plan were last approved on January 9, 2001. Their re- adoption is being requested in order to maintain the two year re-adoption schedule required by the Comprehensive Plan and City Charter. Both the text and map of both documents have been modified in order to update them to reflect changes that have occurred over the past two years. Examples of such updating include correcting the Major Street and Highway Plan map and Appendix A to show Folsom Road between Dowlen and Major as a completed project rather than proposed and making the same change on the "Development Strategies Diagram" of the Land Use Plan Element. No significant, substantive changes have been made to either plan element. The planning staff is presently compiling 2000 Census data for use in creating complete updates of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan with the Parks,Recreation,&Open Space Plan anticipated for completion next Fall. The same data will be used in the next re-adoption of the Land Use and Transportation elements. BUDGETARY IMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a joint Public Hearing with City Council held December 16, 2002, the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve the re-adoption, with no significant modifications, of the currently adopted Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its accompanying"Development Strategies Plan" and re-adoption, with no significant modifications, of the currently adopted Major Street & Highway Plan"Map"and accompanying"Appendix A"defining street and highway development standards of the plan, all of which are components of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. RECOMMENDED MOTION Approve/Deny the re-adoption,with no significant modifications,of the currently adopted Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan and its accompanying"Development Strategies Plan"and re-adoption, with no significant modifications, of the currently adopted Major Street & Highway Plan"Map"and accompanying"Appendix A"defining street and highway development standards of the plan, all of which are components of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont. MAJOR STREET & HIGHWAY PLAN A Component of the Comprehensive Plan of The City of Beaumont with APPENDIX"A": "Major Street&Highway Plan Development Standards" Adopted January 2003 MAJOR STREET & HIGHWAY PLAN A Component of the Comprehensive Plan of The City of Beaumont with APPENDIX"A": "Major Street&Highway Plan Development Standards" KATY Prepared by The Planning Division of the Public Works Department Prepared for Beaumont, Texas City Planning and Zoning Commission Laurie Leister, Chairman Greg Dykeman, Vice Chairman Glenn Bodwin Marty Craig Dale A. Hallmark Carlos Hernandez Walter Kyles Dohn LaBiche William Lucas January, 2003 Table of Contents Title Page. Proof of Adoption. Table of Contents. Exhibit"A". Appendix"A". M AJO - \ ETAND HIGHWAY PLAN ,S T R RESOLUTION - WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission r,cogrdws its responsibiidies as provided for b Sec.2-32 of Me City Code for establishing Plans and standards for meta'$treats and highways serving the City and the ^vv C_Umt)eftOn ama within the City.Extra-territorial Jurisdiction:and, WHEREAS.such plans and standards are needed in order to Insure objectivity,consistency,and emraancy N meetlnp rite transponation needs d the comntlatitY;and, WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission Intends that Utere be coordinetlan in the development of such --------------- -.� tranaporletlan system elements with otlhor physbal development b aNer o mezknize the eaedive use d such fantiUes and Provide/or the tmely deveopment d prose elements d the IrenePorlaUon network that �� : wit wpporl pre growth and redevebpmanl needs d the conxrtunity;end. WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission has reviewed this Major Streets and Highways Plan as an L_� _ s; Neneed d the Comprehensive Plan al a Wblis hearing held prerson:and. WHEREAS.the Planning Commisslan of pie Cly d see"n"'has studied and has concluded Ural t should lo reconxrrend the edopd-of the Major Street and Highway Plan harem presented: NOW.THEREFORE,be It resolved by the City Planning Commission that It recommends to the City .� Council of the City of Besummt that said Major Skeet and Highway Plan be adopted as a component of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Beaumont;and ' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that seta Major Skeet d Highway Plan shill ptdde the btpbmenlatan of the capital Improvement propnm Insofar as said program+tads acaWsitlan anNor kngavement of the tansporlatlon network. PASSED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Beaumont this day of ,2002. 8 i r N rx uv •;t.. 'tr \ Chairman, Beaumont Planning Commislon Date op N N ; !C� M� • °' I t City Council Resolution/Ordinance No Date: rr , u tt r r Mayor p Date Evelyn � , 1 k � r Pine Forest G h V— h 4 State Hwy.105 Ext.East i 1 I r Bevil Oaks 1 .. ' '/' .� , ——— L—T i 1 Ydor r .- — 1 105 r� ( ; ' p ��` i ✓. — aa 8 i ALIGNMENT OF MAJOR BREEETS ----Fubae Major Street Example ofAlknm$d Range Fut—My« rta,. C*K* Shat } Rose City An. Arterial T\ `Fr See Inset M.1or U. a B Belo t---^--- .n t F CoH.eM I • , CoU$c Road -- .t br Road i ,r � s r j v. r f sn.aw aro.e aasuea sow aw ap«xa<.asw«nti r«propowa it t achxl allpnnwal of the 6oia rand ghat«sewN.an ul«Ird al the ak..in b1rom tlw erkwnsM .nairw.rlaa WWwhmaeirow- .how^In er.cM. ^Fnowna�ask^.^Mors i - , I OTHER MAP FEATURES , r ' ---------------- BEAUMONT E TJ --------- BEAUMONT CORPORATE Ll, ••✓ % �, j \ u - _ —_____ OTHER CORPORATE LIMITS , } • 1 7 - I RAILROAD r 1 HYDROLOGY c a � rh , , Nfalls � • '�`♦'��+ �` -camp^=s_ _-_ i , \` \`.i g � `�`'I y,. Ir ----- Mme. + I I , ♦ \ / "'I s r 1 � , id-Counter Ex(xesswa Nederland � 1 0 1 2 Miles This map was prepared by the staff of the Planning Division using I Are View cis soffware and digital data received courtesy of the 8 ` fZ Y '/ \✓ v \ South East Texas Regional Piatvnkrg Commission.Because changes were made to both the scale of the various digital fibs used and the r . location of leahaes as shovan on the resulting map,t"prep Is to be considered nothing move than a graphical representation of the .4 Port Arthur features slhovah far tlne area.The map b therefcre not suitable f« 1 - �l tekkq measurorients«establishing lhohaMedes. No relxeseme- tio,ro«oamartles wXh regard to aceraar.Y«CWVelanena of the - 1 -. ••'ffi� 11 i f I ya - Infamatian aeplaee on this map Is kaended. _ 1 ♦ 1' h °-?' - 1` w Prepared by the City of Beaumont Planning Division of the Department of Economic Development November 2002 1 Recorded at the Jefferson County Courthouse Date: File#: Volume#:N/A Page#:N/A Map Records y/ IH-10 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ------------ CLASSIFICATION EXISTING ROAD FUTURE ROAD OR RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY _ FREEWAY CLASSIFICATION URBAN SUBURBAN' RURAL ' �s EXPRESSWAY PARKWAY •• N FREEWAY Varies Varies Varies EXPRESSWAY Varies Varies Varies R MAJOR ARTERIAL NN�t1 ,+:~\ MAJOR ARTERIAL SECONDARY ARTERIAL sir_ �� 60 to 100 80'to 120' 109 to 150' \� MAJOR COLLECTOR ——__—_ SECONDARY ARTERIAL 60'to 90' 60'to 90' 100'to 150' MOP NON-MAJOR STREETS Alignments of future MAJOR COLLECTOR 60'to 70' 60'to 70' 100'to 150' B roadways are approximate a ro NOTE:See Appendix W for specific R.O.W.requirements for each roadway Rights-of-way will be 100'and 150'where shoulders are used for Collector and CORE INSET MAP Arterial streets respectively. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Ord./Res. No.: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min, CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Avenue"A" SA-u College south to Franklin. 60' 2 CTL C&G SA-u Franklin south to Washington. 60' 2 CTL C&G — -_ SA-u Washington south to Woodrow. TO' 4 No C&G --- — SA-u Woodrow south to West Virginia. TO 4 No C&G Avenue"A"Ext.South SA-u West Virginia south to West Pt,Arthur TO' 4 No C&G --- Road. — For southward condnuadon of corridor see West Port Arthur Road. Avenue"C" MC-u Crockett south to Wall. 60' 2 No C&G MC-u Wall south to Franklin. 60' 2 CTL C&G MC-u Franklin south to Irma St. 60' 2 CTL C&G -- MC-u Irma St.south to Washington. —66— No C&G --- MC-u Washington south to Harriot. 60 2 No C&G Baker Rd. MC-s Wescalder west to Pt.Arthur FWC, 60 2 No C&G MC-s Westcalder east to Sandlin Street. 60' 2 No Baker Rd.-Ext.East MC-s Sandlin St.east to S.Major to PT.Arthur 60' 2 No C&G FWC — — MC-s PT.Arthur FWC east to Dowlen Rd.Ext. 60' 2 No S.at UNR-2 Baker Rd.-Ext.West MC-s Pt.Arthur FWC west to Keith Rd.Ext. 60 2 No C&G South to Main Lane Ext.S.to Smith R. — — Ext.North. Belvedere Dr. MC-s Calder north to Phelan. - MC-s Phelan north to Gladys to Regina. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Bridge needed at Hillebrandt Bayou. For corridor condnuadon see Regina. Bigner Rd. MC-u E.Lucas north to Maida to Roland. 60' 2 CTL Bigner Rd.-Ext.West MC-u From Roland north and then west to 60' 2 CTL C&G HHbig Rd.at or near Comstock. — — Blanchette MC-u Main St west to Neches. --TO- 4 No C&G --- __ Blewett Rd. MC-s Fannett Rd.south approx. t mile. 100' 2 No SH -- -- Portion near Fannett would be parallel to Mid-County Expressway. Blewett Rd.-Ext.South MC-r From approx.1 mile south of Fannett 100' 2 No SH — Rd.southeasterly to Winzor Rd.at _ Blewett Road. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Develo ment Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Ord./Res. No.: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru Or Gutter or ing walks For corridor continuation Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) southward see Winzor Road. Blewett Rd. MA-s Labelle Rd.west approx.1 &1/8 mile. 150' 2 No SH -� --_ For continuation of corridor east of Labelle Road,see Humble Rd.Ext. West. Blewett Rd.-Ext.West. MA-s From approximately Ito 1 &1/8 miles 150 —2 ---14-0 SH --- west of Labelle extend northwesterly and then west to again connect with Blewett Rd. east of Winzor Road. Blewett Rd. MA-s From Blewett Rd.Ext.West at Blewett 150' 2 No SH -- Rd.westward to Winzor Road. MA-r From Winzor Rd,west to end of existing 150' 2 No SH --- - Blewett Road approximately 500 feet west of Winzor Road. Blewett Rd.-Ext.West. MA-r From approximately 500 west of Winzor 150' 2 No SH - Rd.at Blewett Rd.west to Fannett Road at Boyt. MA-r From Fannett Rd.west along Boyt Road 150' 2 CTL SH — --- Suggest Boyt Rd.between Fannett Rd.and I1-1-10 be re-named as to 11-1-10. Blewett Road. Also see Meeker Road Ext.South for re-naming of For westward continuation of Boyt Road west of I1-1-10. corridor see Meeker Road Ext. South. Boyt Rd.,South MC-r Lawhon Rd.south to Kidd Rd.to 100' 2 No SH _ - UNR-9A at UNR-9B to Macks Rd. Boyt Rd.,South-Ext.South. —MC- C-r Mack's Rd,south to Meeker Rd.Ext. 100 2 No SH South. Bristol Dr. MC-s 23rd St.west to E.Caldwood. 60 2 No C&G Broad Oak MC-s Old Voth Rd.east to northbound service 65' 2 --No C&G road of Eastex Frwy. MC-s Eastex Frwy.East to SherwoTE -- Brooks Rd. SA-s Fannett Rd.west to IH-10. CTL C&G SAs IH-10 west to S.Major Drive CTL C&G SA-s S.Major Dr.west to Keith RdCTL to Smith Road.SA-s From Smith Road west to S. No Road. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: S =8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Brooks Rd.-Ext.West SA-r S.Pine Island Rd.west to Meeker Rd. 150' 2 No SH -- -- Ext.S. Brooks Rd.-Ext. East MC-s Fannett Rd.east to Tyrrell Park Rd. 60' 2 No Broussard Rd.(North) WC-s Tram Rd.west to Loop Road. 60 2 No C&G -- --- Broussard Rd.(South) VC--r Hiilebrandt Rd west to Latta Road. 100 2 No SH Buford—St.—MC--u From eastern City Limits west to Carroll 70' 2 No SH -- -- St. MC-u Carroll St.west to Leiper St.to Sabine 70' 4 No C&G --- --- Pass. See Royal St.for Buford-Royal corridor continuation. Calder Avenue. SA-u Main St west to MLK Pkwy. 70 4 CTL --- SA-u MLK Pkwy.west to 11th St.to IH-10. 70' 4 CTL C&G -- -- SA-u IH-10 west to 18th St. 90' 4 CTL C&G -- --- SA-u 18th St.west to W.Lucas. 70' 4 No C&G — --_ SA-u W.Lucas west to Phelan. _f0_ CTL MC-u Phelan west to Dowlen to Phelan. 70' 2 CTL C&G --- __ For corridor continuation see Phelan. Caldwood Ave.,East. MC-s Calder south to Cross at Bristol. 60' 2 No C&G --- __ WC-s Cross at Bristol south to SP RR. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- For Continuation of East Caldwood-Lindbergh Corridor see Lindbergh Avenue. Callahan Road(Hardin Co.) MC-s From Keith Rd.north to proposed 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Hardin-Jefferson Parkway. MC-s From proposed Hardin-Jeffersom Pkwy. 60' 2 No —d-&-G- north to F.M.421. Callaghan St.(See Rolfe Christopher Dr. Campus Avenue. MC-u Highland west to present end west of --- Ector Street. Campus Avenue Ext.West.. MC-u From present end west of Ector Street 60' 2 No C&G 2 -- extend west to connect with Avenue"A" Ext.South. Campus Avenue Ext.East. MC-u Extend east from Highland to East 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Virginia ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: S =8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To RMf #Thru or Gutter or Ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Cardinal Drive,E.&W.(See U.S.69,96,&287). Carroll St. MC-u Buford south to Grant to Doucette. 70' 4 No C&G — --- For southward continuation of corridor see Syamore Street. Caswell St. MC-s S.H.105 north to Eastex Frwy.(service 60' 2 No C&G — -- Pavement to widen at S.H.105 to provide turning lane. road). Chinn Ln. SA-s Old Voth Rd.east to Eastex Frwy.north 90' 4 CTL C&G -- —_ bound service road. MC-s Eastex Frwy.north bound service road W. 2 No C&G -- -- Pavement to widen at Eastex Frwy to provide turning lanes. east to UNR-8 to Meadowview at Lawrence. See Meadowview for corridor continuation. Chinn Ln.-Ext.West. SA-s Old Voth Rd.west to approximately 150' 90' 4 CTL C&G --- -- Currently does not exist west of Old Voth Rd.to San Diego and east of San Diego Street. between Walker and N.Major Drive. —§A--s From approximately 150'east of San 90' 4 CTL C&G -- -- Currently does not exist west of Old Voth Rd.to San Diego and Diego St.west to Walker. between Walker and N.Major Drive. SA-s From Walker west to N.Major Drive. 90' 4 CTL C&G -- -- Currently does not exist west of Old Voth Rd.to San Diego and between Walker and N.Major Drive. SA-s N.Major west to Griffin Ext.West to 90' 4 No C&G -- -- Would parallel LNVA canal on the south side. Perl Road. See Pert Rd.for westward Suggest this portion of Perl be re-named Chinn. continuation of corridor. Circuit Dr.,East MC-u Calder north to Edson at N.Circuit. 60' 2 No C&G — _- Circuit Dr.,North MC-u Edson west to Peyton. 60' 2 No C&G -- — See Peyton for westward continuation of corridor. Cleveland Ave. MC-u Delaware north to Filmore and to E. W. 2 No C&G -- -- Lucas. CollegeSt.(U.S.90). MA-u Main to Orleans Street. W. 4 CTL C&G — -- MA-u Orleans to Neches. 75' 4 CTL C&G -- _- (1-Way West Bound) MA-u Neches at College to Wall at Trinity. 60' 3 No C&G -- -- (1-Way West Bound) MA-u Using Wall from Trinity west to MLK 60' 3 No C&G -- --- Pkwy. (1-Way West Bound) MA-u Using Wall from MLK Pkwy.west to 60' 3 to 2 No C&G -- --- Orange Avenue. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru of Gutter or Ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) " (1-Way East bound). MA-u Orange Avenue east to MLK Pkwy. 80' 2 to 3 No C&G --- -- " (1-Way East bound). MA-u MLK Pkwy.east to Trinty. 60' 3 No C&G – --- " (1-Way East bound). MA-u Trinity east to Neches. 65' 3 No C&G --- --- "(2-way). MA-u Orange Avenue west to Ave.D. 75' 4 CTL C&G -- --- MA-u Ave.D west to Fourth St. 70' 4 CTL C&G -- — MA-u Fourth St.west to SP RR. 70' 4 CTL C&G --- -- MA-u SF RR west to Eighth St.to Eleventh St. 100' 4 CTL C&G --- --- MA-u Eleventh St.west to IH-10. 100' 6 CTL C&G -- -- MA-s IH-10 west to Dowlen Rd.to Major Dr. 120' 6 CTL C&G — Grade Separation at Major. MA-s Major Dr.west to Wescalder to 580' 120' 6 CTL C&G -- --- west of Wescalder. MA-s 580'west of Wescalder to Keith Rd.to 150' 4 M C&G -- -- Gentry Rd. Ext.South and Smith Road Ext.North connection at College. MA-r From Gentry Rd. Ext.South and Smith 150' 4 M SH -- -- Rd.Ext.North connnection at College west to Meeker to the ETJ Line. Collier Rd. MC-s Shakespeare west to Major Dr. 60' 2 No C&G — -- Comstock Rd. MC-u Glen Oaks Circle north to Helbig at 60' 4 No C&G --- -- Signer Rd.Ext.West. See Signer Rd.-Ext. West for eastward continuation of corridor. Comstock Rd.-Ext.South. MC-u Glen Oaks Circle south to S.H.105 Ext. 60' 4 No C&G — -- East at proposed Dowlen Rd.Ext.North. See Dowlen Rd.-Ext.North for southward continuation of corridor. Concord Rd. SA-s S.H.105 south to Judy Lane. 90' 4 CTL C&G --- – " Re-alignment SA-s Judy south to Garner Road. NY 4 CTL C&G --- -- Concord Rd. SA-s Garner Rd.south to N.Dowlen Road. 90' 4 CTL C&G --- --- SA-u Dowlen Rd.south to E.Lucas. 80' 4 CTL C&G — -- " SA-u E.Lucas south to Pinkston. 80' 4 CTL C&G --- --- " SA-u Pinkston south to east of Beard. 80' 4 CTL C&G -- ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord.!Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To RAN #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Concord Realigment SA-u From east of Beard east across RR to 80' 4 CTL -- connect with old Concord R/W south to point near Ironton. Concord—Rd. —SA--u Ironton south to Live Oak. 80' 4 CTL C&G --- -- 'east east bound) —§A---u Live Oak southeasterly to Gulf Street. 60' 2 No C&G --(1 Way westbound) SA-u Gulf west to Live Oak. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- See Gulf St. for southward continuation of corridor and Mariposa Streets for connection to MLK Parkway.. Corley Ave. MC-u MLK Pkwy.west to Ave.A to Fourth 60 2 No C&G --- -- Corley is not accessible by northbound MLK traffic. Corley traffic Street. can only go southbound on MLK. MC-u Fourth St.west to Eleventh Street. 60' 4 No C&G -- -- MC-u Eleventh St west to—1H 10 --90— No C&G --- --- Cottonwood Ave. MC-u Concord west to RR.to Roman Street. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- MC-u Roman St.west to 7th St. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- See Do/linger for westward continuator of corridor. Crockett Street MC-u Pine west to Main Street. 60' 4 CTL C&G -- --- MA-u Pearl St.west to Orleans. 80' 4 CTL C&G -- --- Plaza interrupts from Oreans to Neches. Connects to Liberty/ Laurel Corridor. Crockett St.(continued). MC-u Neches west to Trinity St.R/W to MLK 60' 2 No C&G --- -- Pkwy.(Spur 380). MC-u MLK Pkwy.west to 6th St. 70' 4 No C&G -- See Hollywood for westward continuation of corridor. Crow Rd. MC-u Dowlen south to Folsom. 60' 4 No C&G --- -- Delaware St. MC-u Pine west to Magnolia. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- SA-u Magnolia west to Gulf St. 60' 2 -- SA-u Gulf St.west to Renaud St. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- SA-u Renaud west to Concord. 70' 2 No C&G -- --- SA-u Concord west to 560'West of 1 0th St. 70' 1 4 1 No 7C&--G — --- ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru of Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) SA-u 560'west of 10th St.to Minglewood to 80' 4 No C&G — — Eastex Frwy. MA-u Eastex Frwy.west to Central Dr. 70' 4 No C&G — -- MA-s Central Dr.west to W.Lucas. 80' 4 CTL C&G -- --- MA-s W.Lucas west to Dowlen Rd. -- MA-s Dowlen Rd.west to N.Major at 100' 4 M _C&_G - Sometimes referred to as Delaware/Dfshman Connector. Dishman. For westward continuation of corridor see Dishman. Detroit Ave. MC-u Concord north to Filmore to E.Lucas 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Detroit Rd.Ext.South MC-u From Concord Rd.south to connect with 60' 2 No C&G —new alignment of Concord Road. Dishman Rd. MA-s From N.Major west to Keith Road. 120' 4 M C&G -- –_ MA-s From Keith Rd.to Gentry Rd.to west 150' 4 M SH — – East-west portion of Gentry Road that connects to Reins Road would side of canal. be re-named Dishman. Dishman Rd.-Ext.West MA-r From west side of canal south to Of 150' 2 No SH — --- Sour Lake Rd.at Meeker Rd.Ext.North. For southward continuation of corridor see Meeker Rd.Ext. North. Doilinger Rd. MC-u 7th St.west to N.9th St.at Hoover. 70' 2 No C&G -- --- An abandoned RR right-of-way running northwesterly from Dollinger at 9th St.to Hoover St.near Eleventh St.might be used to connect See Hoover St,for was Dollinger with Eleventh St. tward continuation of corridor. Dowlen Rd. MA-s Eastex Frwy.south and west to Old 100' 4 M C&G — -- Dowlen Rd. MA-s Old Dowlen Rd.south to Folsom Dr. 120' 4 M C&G — — MA-s Folsom Dr.south to Gladys Ave. 100' 4 M C&G — -- MA-s Gladys south to Westgate to Lexington. 100' 4 CTL C&G — - MA-s Lexington south to Calder to College. 100' 4 M C&G -- -- Grade Separation at SPRR. Dowlen Rd.-Ext.South MA-s College Dr.south to Washington Blvd.to 100' 4 M C&G -- — Baker Rd./UNR-2 intersection to Walden Rd. Dowlen Rd.,North MA-u Eastex Frwy.to Concord Rd. 100' 4 M C&G --- --- ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R!W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Dowlen Rd.,North-Ext.North —WA__u Concord Rd.to a point west of Garner 100' 4 M C&G — --- Rd.and east of Comstock Rd.and then north to S.H. 105 Ext.East. See Comstock Rd.Ext.South Dowlen Rd.would end at intersection of S.H.105 and Comstock Rd. for northward continuadon of Ext.South. corridor. Eastex Frwy. Frwy IH-10 to Delaware north to Jefferson Co. Varies 6 M C&G State&Federal Standards apply.(U.S.69,96,&287) Line, Edson Drive. MC-u N.Circuit north to Gladys to Delaware. 60 2 No Eleventh St. —MA--u Eastex Frwy,south to Delaware to IH-10 100' 4 CTL C&G --- --- to 360'north of Ashley. MA-u From 360'north of Ashley south to 100' 4 CTL Calder to Hollywood to College. MA-u College south to Washington to Fannett 100' 4 CTL C&G --- -- Road(S.H.124)at Sarah Street. Erie Street SA-s Cardinal Dr.south to LNVA Canal to 90' 4 CTL SH -- -- Walden Rd.Ext.East. Erie St.Ext.South SA-s From Walden Rd.Ext.East south to 150' 4 M SH --- Hillebrandt Road. SA-s Hillebrandt Rd.south to FM 3514 Ext. 150' 4 M SH --- -- West. SA-s FM 3514 Ext.West to Mid-Co.Expwy. 150' 4 M SH -- -- Would extend south to Humble Rd. and the ETJ Line. Fannett Rd.(State Hwy.124). MA-u Washington south to Fourth St. 60' 2 CTL C&G --- --- MA-u Fourth St.south to Eleventh St. 100' 4 M C&G -- -- MA-u Eleventh St.south to Cardinal Drive. 120' 6 M -- MA-s Cardinal Dr.south to Walden Road. 120' 6 M C&G --- --- MA-s Walden Rd.south to Brooks Rd.to 120' 4 M C&G -- -- Major Dr.at Frint Dr. MA-s Major Dr.at Frint Dr.south to Mid-Co. 120' 4 M C&G -- -- Expwy. MA-r Mid-Co.Expwy.south to Blewett Rd. 150' 4 M SH -- -- Extends to FM 365. Ext.West to ETJ Line. Fannin St. MC-u Fourth St.west to 11th Street. W. 4 M C&G -- -- FM 365 MA-r Between ETJ Line west of Hillebrandt 150' 4 M SH -- Rd.and ETJ Line west of Labelle Rd. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) FM 421 MA-r From U.S.69 west to ETJ Line. 150' 2 No SH -- --- FM 1131 SA-r Portion in Orange County within City of 150' 2 No SH — -- Beaumont ETJ. FM 3513 SA-r From U.S.69/96/287 north to ETJ line. 150' 2 No SH --- --- FM 3514 MA-s U.S.69 west to W.Pt,Arthur Road. 150' 2 No SH --- --- FM 3514-Ext.East MA-s U.S.69 east to ETJ line. 150' 2 No SH — --- Does not now exist. Ultimately,to extend to Twin City Hwy. FM 3514-Ext.East MA-a From U.S.69/96/287 north east approx. 150' 2 No SH -- --- 1200'to ETJ line. " MA-s For any portion developed north of Twin 150' 2 No SH -- -- Will require a bridge over the Neches River. Should connect with City Highway that may be within the ETJ. IH-10 in Orange County. FM 3514-Ext.West (A-s W.Pt.Arthur Rd.west to Erie St.Ext.S. 150' 2 No SH --- — then West and Southwest to Hillebrandt Rd.&Mid-Co.Expwy.near Latta Road. " (Also described under MA-s Latta Rd.west to Labelle Rd.to Fannett 150' 2 No SH — -- Portion from Latta Rd.west to IH-10 would become Mid-County Mid-County Expressway) Rd.at Smith Rd.to IH-10. Expressway. Would use a portion of existing Blewett Rd. R/W and Steinhagen Rd.RIK Sea Hardin-Jefferson Pkwy. for westward continuation of corridor. Fiilmore St. MC-u Magnolia west to Cleveland,Detroit,and 60' 2 No C&G -- -- SF RR R/W 140'west of Harding. Fillmore St.-Ext.West MC-u From 140'west of Harding to Woodlawn 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Crosses SF RR R/W. at Redwood. See Redwood for westward continuation of corridor. Florida Ave. SA-u MLK Pkwy.west to 160'east of Rolfe 60' 4 No C&G --- --- Christopher(Callaghan). —§A--u From 160'east of Rolfe Christopher 90' 4 M C&G — -- (Callaghan)west to Chambers. SA-u Chambers west to East Parkway to 90' 4 No C&G --- -- Highland. SA-u Highland Ave. west to Park. 90' 4 M C&G — --- SA-u Park west to W.Port Arthur Rd.to 90' 4 No C&G -- -- Cardinal. Folsom Dr. SA-u West Lucas to 360'west of Crow. 70' 4 No C&G -- - - —§-A---u From 360'west of Crow to 635'west of 80' 4 No C&G --- --- Kipling. SA-u From 635 west of Kipling to Dowien. 90' 4 No C&G -- -- ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications 8 MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Ord./Res. No.: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Folsom Dr.-Ext.West SA-s Dowlen west to N.Major to Keith Road. 90 4 M C&G -- S_A s Keith Road west to Hardin-Jefferson 100 4 M SH — -- Alignment shown on map changed. Parkway. See Gentry Rd.for westward continuation of corridor. Changed southward to westward. Four Oaks Ranch Road(old MC-r Fm 1131 south to proposed S.H. 105 100' 2 No Sh -- --- Beaumont-Orange Rd.) extension between Jefferson and Orange counties. Fourth St. MA-u Calder south to College to Cardinal Drive 70' 4 East bound service road. Fourth St.-Ext.South -WA-s—From Cardinal Dr.eas bbound service 100 4 CTL SH -- road south to Walden Rd.Ext.East. MA-s Walden Rd.Ext.East south to 150' 4 M SH Hillebrandt Rd. See Hillebrandt Rd.for southward continuation of corridor. Franklin St. MC-u Main west to MLK Pkwy. 70' 2 CTL C&G -- --. MC-u MLK Pkwy.west to 4th St. 60' 2 CTL C&G --- _. Frint Dr. MC-s Fannett Rd.to Approx.2000'east of 70' 4 No C&G -- -_ Labelle Rd. Frint Dr.-Ext.South. VC-s From Approx.2000'east of Labelle Rd. 70' 4 No C%G -- -- southeast to Tyrrell Park Rd.-Ext. South. MC-s From Tyrrell Park Rd.-Ext.South south 70' 2 No SH -- -_ to Mid-Co.Expwy.at Steinhagen Road. See Steinhagen for southward continuation of corridor. Gaulding Rd. MC-r Fannett Rd.(S.H.124)south to ETJ Line, 100' 2 No SH — -- Road extends to FM 365. Gentry Rd. MC-s Dishman north to Folsom Ext.West. 150' 4 M SH -- — Downgraded from SA-s to MC-s because Hardin-Jefferson Pkwy. Gentry Road MC-r Folsom Rd.Ext.West westward to 150' 2 No SH would provide the needed arterial road. --- -- Reins Road. Gladys Ave. SA-u IH-10 west to Lucus. 80' 4 No C&G -- SA-s Lucus west to Thomas Road to Dowlen 80' 4 No C&G Road. SA-s Dowlen Road west to N.Major. 80' 4 No -- GrifFing Rd. MC-s Old Voth Rd.west to Major Dr. 60' 2 No C&G - -_ ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru of Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Griffing Rd.-Ext.West. MC-s Major Dr.west and north to Chinn Ln. 60' 2 No C&G -- — Ext.West. Gulf St. MC-u Delaware south to Live Oak to Concord 60' 2 CTL C&G -- -- Road. SA-u Concord Road south to IH-10. 60' 2 No C&G - This is the south bound 1-way corridor to MLK Pkwy. See MLK Pkwy.for southward condnuadon of corfidor. Hardin-Jefferson Parkway. MA-s From IH-10 at Smith Road to Smith Rd. 200' 4 M SH --- — Alignment may follow Smith Rd.or parallel Smith Rd.some distance at Walden Road. on the east or west. MA-s From Walden Rd.at or near Smith Rd. 200' 4 M SH — — Grade separation interchange at College St.(U.S.90). Access to northwesterly to connect with College St. adjoining properties should not be permitted. (U.S.90). MA-s From College St.(U.S.90)northward 200' 4 M SH -- -- Grade separation interchange at College St.(U.S.90). Grade along or near the west side of Port separation at Old Sour Lake Road. Initial development could be as a Arthur Canal to Old Sour Lake Road. 2-lane roadway. Access to adjoining properties should not be ., permitted. MA-s From Old Sour Lake Rd.north to LNVA 200' 4 M SH -- -- Grade separation at Old Sour Lake Road. Grade separate Canal to Gentry Rd.,and to State Hwy. interchange at State Hwy.105. Initial development could be as a 105 at Tolivar Canal Road. 2-lane roadway. Access to adjoining properties should not be permitted. MA-s From Tolivar Canal Rd.at State Hwy. 200' 4 M SH -- — Grade separation interchange at State Hwy.105.Bridge at Pine Island 105 northward along or near Tolivar Bayou. Initial development could be as a 2-lane roadway. Access to Canal Rd.to Tram Rd.to Pine Island adjoining properties should not be permitted. Bayou. MA-s From Pine Island Bayou northward to 200' 4 M SH --- --- Bridge at Pine Island Bayou. Grade separation interchange at U.S.69 Keith Rd.then northeast to Callahan Rd. &96. Interchange should permit traffic to go north on U.S.96 and then east to connect with U.S.69 and northwest on U.S.69. An alternative to going north through U.S.96 south of Lumberton. Lumberton on U.S.96 would be using FM 3513. Access to adjoining properties should not be permitted. Harriot St. MC-u Southerland/Harriot Connector at RR 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Suggest name as Southerland and align to enter Stadium Shopping east to Ave.B. Center north of current entrance. See Southerland St.for westward condnuadon of corridor. Helbig Rd. SA-u From East Lucas north to S.H.105 Ext. 80' 4 No C&G — — East to Comstock. SA-s From Comstock north to Piney Point 80' 4 No C&G — — Lane at LNVA canal. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or Ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) See Piney Point Ln.(Tram Road Ext.East)for westward continuation of corridor. Highland Ave. SA-u Irving Chapin south to Alma. 90' 4 CTL C&G SA-u Alma south to Florida. 70 4 No C&G -- --- SA-u Florida south to Cardinal. 60' 4 No C&G --- — SA s Cardinal south to Sulphur Dr.Ext.West. 60 4 No SH --- --_ See Sulphur Dr Ext. West for westward continuation of corridor. Hillebrandt Rd. MC-s W.Port Arthur Rd.west to Erie St.Ext. 100' 2 No SH --- -- South to Fourth St.Ext.South at Hillebrandt Rd. MA-s From Fourth St.Ext.S.south along 150' 4 M SH --- --- Hillebrandt Rd.to FM 3514 to Mid-Co. Expwy. MA-s Mid-Co. Expwy.south to Humble Rd.to 150' 4 M SH -- -- Eventually goes to FM 365. ETJ Line. Hodge Rd. MC-s Broussard Rd(N)at Loop Rd.south to 60' 2 No _C&_G --- __ present end. Hodge Rd.-Ext.South MC-s Present end south across DD6 canal# 60' 2 No C&G -- --- 1002 to Tram Rd.at Major Drive. Hollywood Ave. MC-u 6th St.west to IH-10. 70' 2 CTL C&G -- -_- See Crockett St.for eastward continuation of corridor. Hoover MC-u 9th St.at Dollinger west to 11 th St. 70' 2 No C&G — -- Houston St. MC-u Southerland St.north to Washington 60" 2 No C&G -- --_ Boulavard. MC-u Washington Blvd.north to Franklin St.to 60 2 No C&G -- -- Milam St. HOUSton St.-Ext.North MC-u Milam St.north to College St. 60' 2 M _6&_G -- --- Humble Rd. MA-r Steinhagen Rd.east to Hillebrandt Rd. 150' 2 No SH -- --- Humble Rd.-Ext.East MA-r Hillebrandt Rd.east to ETJ Line. 150' —2 —__S No H --- --- Road would ultimately extend to W.Pt.Arthur Road. Humble Rd.-Ext.West. MA-r Steinhagen Rd.west to Labelle/Blewett 150' 2 No SH -- -- intersection. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned FacHities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) See Blewett Rd,for westward continuation of corridor. Imes Road MA-r College Street(U.S.90)north to Old 150' 2 No SH — -- Sour Lake Road Imes Rd.Extension No MA-r Old Sour Lake Rd.north to State Hwy. 150' 2 No SH -- -- 105. MA-r State Hwy.105 north to Keith Rd.to 150' 2 No SH -- --- F.M.421 near Bonweil. Imes Rd.Extension South. MA-r College Street(U.S.90)south to ETJ 150' 2 No SH -- --- Would ultimately extend to IH-10 at F.M.365. Line. Interstate Highway 10 --- --_ ___ ___ –_ ___ __- Inwood Street Extension MC-s See UNR-13. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- East. Irving Ave. MC-u Buford south to Doucette to Madison. 60' 2 No C&G --- -- MC-u Madison south to Washington Blvd. 60' 4 No C&G --- — Underpass at Spur 380(MLK Pkwy.). SA-u Washington Blvd.south to Highland 60' 4 No C&G --- --- Underpass at Spur 380(MILK Pkwy.). Avenue. Jacquise Rd. MC-s Spurlock east to N.Major Dr. 60' 2 No C&G — -- Keith Rd. SA-s Perl Rd.south to S.H. 105 to Dishman 90' 4 M C&G ---to College(U.S.90). Keith Rd.-Ext.South SA-s College southwest to Shady Ln. �' 4 M C&G --- (Washington Blvd. SA-s Shady Ln.(Washington Blvd.)south to �' 4 M C&G -- - Baker Rd.Ext.West to Weldon Rd.to Brooks Rd.to Smith Road at Lawhon Rd.Ext.East. Keith Rd.(Hardin Co.) SA-s U.S.69 west to Callahan Road. 9 2 No C&G --- –_ SA-s Callahan Rd.west to proposed W. 2 No C&G --- -- Hardin-Jefferson Parkway. SA-s From proposed Hardin-Jefferson Pkwy. 100' 2 No SH --- – west to proposed Imes Rd.Extension North. Kidd Rd. MC-r Smith Rd.west to S.Boyt Road. 100' 2 No SH -- -- Labelle Rd. MC-s Fannett Rd.south to Frint Rd.to S. 60' 2 No I &G — -- Major Dr.Ext.South. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted; Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) MA-s S.Major Dr.Ext.South at Mid-Co. 150' 4 M SH --- -- Expwy.south to Blewett Rd.at future Humble Rd.Ext.West. MA-r Blewett Rd.south to FM 365 to ET J 150' 4 M SH -- --- Line. Langham Rd. MC-s Calder south to Westwood. 60' 2 No C&G --- -- MC-s Westwood south to College. 70' 2 CTL C&G --- --- " MC-s College south to Washington. 70 2 CTL C&G --- -- Latta Rd. MC-r Humble Rd.north to Mid-Co.Expwy.to 100' 2 No SH Broussard Rd.(S). Laurel Ave.(2-way). MC-u Office Park Drive east to 23rd.St.to 60' 2 No C&G — -- IH-10. MC-u IH-10 east to 12th Street. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Laurel Ave.(one-way east MA-u 12th St.East to 11th Street. 60' 3 to 2 No C&G -- -- Grade Separation at IH-10(Maury Meyers Overpass). bound). " MA-u 11 th St.East to MLK Pkwy. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- MA-u MLK Pkwy.to Magnolia. 60' 2 No C&G --- -- MA-u Magnolia to Neches. 60' 3 No C&G -- — MA-u Neches to Park. 60' 4 M C&G --- --- MA-u Park to Orleans. 100' 4 CTL C&G -- --- Lavaca St. SA-u Sarah at SP RR east to Ave.A to Park to 70' 4 No C&G -- -- Grade Separation at SP RR. Highland at E.Lavaca. Lavaca St.,East SA-u Highland east to Hartel. 70' 4 No C&G -- –_ SA-u Hartel east to University Dr.to MLK 70' 4 M C&G -- -- Pkwy. Lawhon Rd. SA-r S.Boyt Rd.west to N.Boyt Rd.to 150' 2 No SH --- — Trahan Rd.to ETJ Line. Lawhon Rd.-Ext.East SA-r S.Boyt.Rd.east and northeast to Smith 150' 2 No SH --- -- Road at Keith Rd.Ext.South. See Keith Rd.for-northward continuation of corridor. Liberty Ave.(1-way west MA-u Magnolia west to Forrest St. 70' 3 No C&G — --- bound). MA-u Forrest St.west to MLK Pkwy. 60' 2 No C&G — -- Grade Separation at SP RR. MA-u MLK Pkwy.west to 11th Street. 70' 3 No C&G -- -- MA-u 11 th St.west to 13th St. 70 3 to 2 No C&G --- — ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Develo ment Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=V shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To RM #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Maids Rd, MC-u Helbig east to Bigner Rd. 60 2 No C&G -- — Main Ln. MC-s College south to present end. 60' 2 No C&G – -- Main Ian.-Ext.South MC-s Present end south to Baker Rd.Ext. 60' 2 No -- West. Main St. SA-u Calder south to 120'north of Fannin. 60 4 No C&G -- --- SA-u 120'north of Fannin south to Gilbert 80' 4 M C&G -- -- SA-u Gilbert south to Blanchette. 80' 4 No C&G --- — Main St.,North MC-u Calder north to Pine St. 60' 2 No C&G — --- Major Dr.,North(FM 364) MA-s Tram Rd.south to LNVA Canal to S.H. 120' 4 CTL C&G --- --- 105. MA-s H.105 south to Gladys to Dishman to 120' 4 CTL C&G — --- Phelan. MA-s Phelan south to SP RR north of College 120' 4 CTL C&G --- — (U.S.90). Major Dr.,South(FM 364) WA--s From SP RR south to College to 120' 6 CTL C&G -- -- Washington. MA-s Washington south to Walden Rd. 120' 6 CTL C&G — -- MA-s Walden Rd.south to Brooks to IH-10 to 120' 6 CTL C&G --- -- Fannett Rd. Major Dr.,South-Ext.South MA-s Fannett Rd.East& South to Labelle 120' 4 M C&G --- --- Road. MA-s Labelle Rd.South to Mid-Co. 120' 4 M C&G — -- Expressway. Manion Dr. MC-s N.Major west to Greenmeadow to 60 2 No C&G --- — Meadowridge. Mariposa St. SA-u IH-10 north to Cadwell to Concord at 60 3 No C&G -- — A 1-way north bound roadway that is the continuation of the MLK Gulf. pkwy.corridor. Mariposa St.South of IH-10 listed as MLK Pkwy. Meadowview Rd. MC-s Chinn Ln.east to Homer to Park North. 60 2 No C&G — --- Meeker Rd. MA-r U.S.90(College)north to a point south 150' 2 No SH --of DD6 Ditch 807. Meeker Rd.-Ext.North MA-r From DD6 Ditch 807 north to Old Sour 150' 2 No SH — – Lake Rd.at Dishman Rd.Ext.West. Meeker Rd. MA-r U.S.90(College)south to present end. 150' 2 No SH -- --- Meeker Rd.-Ext.South MA-r From present end south to Walden Rd. 150 2 No SH -- — Ext.West to Brooks Rd.Ext.West. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) MA-r Brooks Rd.Ext.West south to Lawhon 150' 2 No SH -- -- Rd.to Trahan Rd. Ext.South. MA-r Trahan Rd.Ext.South southward to 150' 2 No SH -- — Re-name portion of Boyt Rd.west of IH-10 as S.Meeker Road. UNR-96 then south and east to Boyt Rd. at IH-10(Future Blewett Rd.Ext.West intersection) See Blewett Rd.Ext: West for eastward continuation of corridor. Mid-County Expwy.(FM Expwy/IH-10 east to Fannett Rd.via Smith Rd. 200' 4 M SH -- -- Rename Smith Rd.segment from IH-10 to Fanned Road as 3514). Frwy Mid-County Expressway. Also identified as FM 3514 which originally would be built as a 2 lane road. Expwy/I Fannett Rd.at Smith Rd.eastward along 200' 4 M SH --- --- Uses a part of existing Blewett Road. No access between Labelle and Frwy or parrallel to and across Blewett Rd.to Blewett. Grade separation interchange at Labelle. connect with Stainhagen Rd.at Labelle Road. Expwy/ Labelle east along or parallel with 200' 4 M SH -- – Grade separation interchange at Labelle. Service roads on both sides. Frwy Steinhagen to Frint Dr.Ext.South. Steinhagen segment will become FM 3514 then Mid-County Expressway. Expwy/ From Frint Dr.-Ext.South east to Latta 200' 4 M SH -- --- Service roads on both sides. Bridge at Hillebrandt Bayou. Frwy Rd. Expwy/ Latta Rd.east to FM 3514 Ext.West to 200' 4 M SH --- --- Grade separation interchange at Hillebrandt Road. Service road on Frwy Hillebrandt Road, both sides. Expwy/ Hillebrandt Rd.east to Erie St. Ext. 200' 4 M SH --- -- No service roads or access between these points. Frwy South to ETJ Line at John's Gully. NOTE:Mid-County Expwy. County&adjacent communities have adopted routing of the would extend beyond ETJ line Mid-County Expressway. to Spudock Rd. MLK Pkwy.(Spur 380)Gulf MA-u IH-10 south to Gladys to 150'north of 60' 3 No C&G – — Uses and re-names a portion of Gulf Street to MLK,Jr.Parkway. St.portion. (1-way south) Ashley. MLK Pkwy.(Spur 380) MA-u From 150'north of Ashley north to IH-10. 70' 3 No C&G --- -- Re-names this portion of Mariposa to MLK,Jr.Parkway. Mariposa portion.(1-way north bound) MLK Pkwy.(two-way) MA-u 150'north of Ashley south to Calder to 100' 6 CTL C&G --- Fannin to Forsythe Street. MA-u Forsythe south to Wail to College to 100' 6 M C&G -- -- Interchange Gilbert to Milam to Franklin. MA-u Franklin south to Royal to Lee to 100' 6 M C&G --- - Changes to expressway access control and design standards Washington. 1 ROAD CLASS Classification LRoadway et and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane ent Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter sifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilties Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) MA-u Washington south to Elgie to Adams. 100' 6 CTL C&G --- --- Changes to expressway access control and design standards. MLK Pkwy.{Spur 380)Old Pt. MA-u Adams to E.Lavaca to Florida to 100' 6 M C&G --- --- Arthur Rd.part. Georgia. MA-u Georgia to Cardinal (U.S.68,96,& 100' 6 M C&G -- --- 287). MA-s Cardinal south to Spindletop to Twin City 120' 6 CTL C&G -- Hwy. Montrose Street MC-s College Street(U.S.90)south to 60' 2 No C&G --- -- Washington Boulevard. Moore Rd. MC-r Reins Rd.west,then south to Old Sour 100' 2 No SH -- --- Lake Rd. Neches street MA-u Liberty south to Laurel. 70' 3 No C&G --- --- Provides connection to Liberty/Laurel corridor. MC-u Laurel south to 140'north of Crockett. 65' 2 No C&G --- --- MC-u 140'north of Crockett south to 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Blanchette. MC-u Blanchette south to Royal. 65' 2 No C&G --- -- North Street. MC-u North Main St.west to Magnolia. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- MC-u Magnolia west to MLK Pkwy. 60 2 No C&G --- --- MC-u MLK Pkwy.west to 7th St.to 11th St. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- MC-u From 11th St.west to IH-10. 60 2 No C&G — -- MC-u iH-10 west to 23rd.St. 60' 2 No C&G - Office Park Or. MC-u Phelan at W.Lucas south to Laurel Ave. 65' 2 CTL C&G -- -- Part of W.Lucas corridor. Old.Dowlen Rd./Old Dowlen SA-s Dowlen Rd.north to UNR-5B to S.H. 90' 4 M C&G --- -- Provide min.14 median&turning lanes as needed. Rd.-Ext.North. 105 at Caswell. Old Hwy.90 MC-s IH-10 to Rose City city limits. 100' 2 No SH -- -- Old Sour Lake Rd. MA-r From Gentry Rd.Ext.S.go west to 150' 2 No SH — -- Dishman Rd.Ext.West at Meeker Rd. Ext.North to Moore Road. For eastward continuation of corridor see Phelan. old Voth Rd. MC-s Best Rd.east to Broad Oak and then 60' 2 No C&G --- --- south to Tram Rd. MC-s Tram Rd.south to Chinn Lane to 60' 2 CTL C&G -- -- Griffing Road. MC s Griffing Rd.south to RFD Road. 60' 2 No C&G – - ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only, MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side . Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) For southward continuation of corridor see RFD Road. Orleans St. (1-Way north SA-u Penn.Ave.at Blanchette north to Wall. 60' 3 No C&G --- --- bound). Orleans/Pearl Connector SA-u Wall north to Orleans south of Forsythe. 60' 3 No C&G -- -- See Pearl St.for continuadon of Orleans-Pearl Corridor. Park St. (1-Way South MA-u Laurel south to Blanchette. 60' 3 No C&G --- — Bound) (See Willow St.for northward continuation of Park-Willow Corridor.) Park St. (1-way south bound) MA-u Blanchette south Royal. 60' 3 No C&G – --- RR underpass. MA-u Royal south to Craig 60' 3 No C&G -- -- MA-u Craig south to MLK Pkwy. 60' 3 No C&G — --- MA-u MLK Pkwy.south to Washington. 60' 2 No C&G -- Add Park Street(as 1-way MA-u From Washington Blvd.south to Harriot 60' 2 No C&G -- 2S south bound). Street. " Extension of MA-u From Harriot Street south and then east 60' 2 No C&G --- 2S to connect to existing Park St.near Alma Street. Park St.(2-way) MA--u From near Alma Street south to Lavaca 60' 2 No C&G --- 2S Street. MA-u From Lavaca south to Florida Street. 60' 2 No C&G - 2S MA-u From Florida St.south,across the S.P. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- RR tracks to connect with Avenue"A". Park North Dr. MC-u Eastex Frwy,north to Meadowview. 60' 2 No C&G — — Pearl St.(1-Way North SA-u North from the Orleans/Pearl 60' 3 No C&G Bound) Connector to Broadway. SA-u Broadway north to Calder. 60' 3 No C&G – -- Pearl St.,North(1 Way North SA-u Calder north to North Street and IH-10 W. 3 No C&G – –_ Bound) ramp. Penn.Ave.(1-way north MA-u Washington Blvd.north to MLK Pkwy. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- bound) (Spur 380). Penn.Ave.(1-way north bound) MA-u MLK Pkwy.(Spur 380)north to Royal. 70' 2 No C&G — -- MA-u Royal north to Blanchette. 70' 3 No C&G — — Continues north as Orleans Street. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Penh.Ave.Extension south of MA-u Connect Penn.Ave.at Washington Blvd. 70' 3 No C&G --- -- Would be 1-way north bound. Washington. to Park St.at or near Harriot Street. Peri Rd. SA-s Keith Rd.east to Chinn Ln.Ext.West 90' 4 No C&G -- --- Suggest re-naming as Chinn. Ped Rd.-Ext.South MC-s Keith Rd.west,then south to S.H.105. 60' 2 No C&G -- --- Suggest re-naming as Chinn. Peyton St. MC-s Westgate east to N.Circuit. 60' 2 No C&G -- --- Phelan Blvd. MA-u Calder at 18th St.west to 23rd St,to 100' 4 M C&G Lucus to Calder to Dowlen Road. MA-s Dowlen Rd.west to N.Major Drive. 100' 4 M C&G --- -- " MA-s N.Major Dr.west to Keith Road. 100' 4 M C&G --- --- MA-s Keith Rd.west to Gentry Rd.Ext.South. 150' 4 M SH -- -- See Old Sour Lake Rd.for westward continuation of corridor. Pine St. MC-u East Lucas south to Delaware to Live 60' 2 No C&G -- - Oak to IH-10. " MC-u IH-10 south to Magazine Street to W. 3 No C&G -- --- Crockett. MC-u Crockett south to Main(1-way north). 60' 2 No C&G – -- Piney Point Ln. SA-u Sherwood east to Helbig. 90' 4 No C&G – --- Suggest re-naming of Piney point Lane between Sherwood and Helbig as Tram Road. Piney Point Ln.Ext.East. SA-u Helbig east and southeast to connect 90' 4 No C&G -- --- with eastward Ext.of S.H.105. See Tram Road Ext.East for westward continuation of corridor. Plant Rd. MC-s Eastex Frwy.(NSR)northeast to Helbig 60' 2 No C&G — -- Rd. Redwood Dr. MC-u Concord Rd.east to Woodlawn. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- " MC-u Woodlawn east to SF RR R/W at 60' 2 No C&G --- -- Also see Fillmore-Ext.West.(Possibly to be re-named as Fillmore). Fillmore. See FXmore for eastward condnuadon of corridor. Regina Ln. MC-s Edson west to Belvedere. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Reins Rd. MC-r S.H.105 south to Moore Rd. 100' 2 No SH --- --- RFD Rd. MC-s S.H. 105 northeast to Old Voth Rd. 60' 2 1 No I C&G — -- ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or Ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) River Oaks Blvd.Extension MC-s See UNR-14. East. Rolfe Christopher Dr. MC-u East Virginia south to Florida. 100' 4 M C&G -- --- Ord.#88-40 changed name Callaghan to Rolfe Christopher Drive. MC-u Florida at Callaghan south to Cardinal. 100' 4D M C&G — - Ord.#88-40 changed name Callaghan to Rolfe Christopher Drive. See Callaghan fornorthward continuation of corridor. Royal St. MC-u Neches east to Park St. 60' 2 No C&G --- -- MC-u Park St.east to Penn.Ave.to Buford at 60' 4 No C&G --- -- Sabine Pass via Royal/Buford Connector. Sarah St. SA-u S.P.RR tracks west to Bob to Usan. 80" 4 No C&G --- --- SA-u Usan west to 4th St. W. 4 No C&G — --- " SA-u 14th St.west to Fannett. 80' 4 No C&G --- --- See Lavaca and Lavaca East for eastward continuation of corridor. Seventh St. MC-u Dollinger south to IH-10. 70' 2 CTL C&G --- --- MC -u IH-10 south to Calder to Laurel. 60' 2 CTL C&G -- --- Shakespeare Dr. MC-s Gladys south to Collier Rd. W. 2 No C&G -- --- Shakespeare Dr.-Ext.North MC-s Gladys north to Delaware(Delaware/ 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Dishman Connector). Sherwood Dr. MC-s Broad Oak south to Piney Point Lane. 70' 2 No C&G --S.Pine Island Rd. MC-s From a point south of College(U.S.90) 100' 2 No SH -- --- south to Walden Rd.to Brooks Rd. S.Pine Island Rd.-Ext.North. MC-s From a point south of College north to 100' 2 No SH --- — College at Yorkshire. For southward continuation of corridor,see Trahan Rd.Ext. North. Southerland St. MC-u Fannett Rd.east to Fourth Street. 617 2 No C&G --- --- MC-u Fourth St.east to Usan St.to 60' 2 No C&G — -- undeveloped St.R/W west of Elem. School. Southerland-Harriot St. MC-u From undeveloped st.R/W west of elem. 60' 2 No C&G — -- Suggest naming new section as Southerland and add"old"to Connector. school east to Harriot St.at RR. remaining portion near school. New Addition to Plan. See Harriot St.for eastward continuation of corridor. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Spindletop Ave. MA-s U.S.69/96/287 west to Sulphur Dr. 80' 4 No SH --- — Spur 380(See MILK Pkwy: — -- Gulf,&Mariposa.) Spurlock Rd. MC-s Keith Rd.east to Jacquise Road. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Corridor continues east to N.Major Drive via Jacquise. State Hwy.106 MA-r ETJ Line in Hardin Co.east to Tram 150' 4 CTL SH — --- Road. MA-s Tram Rd.east to Keith Rd.(City Limits). 150' 4 M SH --- --- MA-s Keith Rd.east to Eastex Frwy. 120' 4 CTL C&G -- —_ —WA--s Eastex Frwy.east to Concord Rd. 120' 4 CTL C&G -- --- State Hwy. 105-Ext.East. —WA---s Concord Rd.east to Dowlen Rd.Ext. 120' 4 M C&G — -- North at Comstock Rd.Ext.South then east to Helbig Road. State Hwy.105-Ext. East. MA-s From Helbig Rd.east and then north to 120' 4 M C&G — -- connect with or run parallel but east of Barrett Road to Bigner Road Extension West. VA--s From Bigner Rd.Extension West north 150' 4 M SH -- --- and northeast toPiney Point Lane Extension East. MA-s From Piney Point Lane Exten.East 150' 4 M SH -- — F.M.1132 would provide access to IH-10 at an existing interchange. extend eastward to follow or parallel pipe /power line R/W to cross Neches River to connect with F.M.105 at or near F.M. 1132. State Hwy.124(See Fannett Rd.) State Hwy.347(See Twin City Hwy.) Steinhagen Rd. MC-s Labelle Rd.east to Frint Rd.Ext.South 100' 2 No SH — --- Will be FM 3514 then become a portion of Mid-County Expressway then south to Humble Road. when built. See UNR-10 for southward --" — continuation of corridor. Stonetown Rd. MC-s Best Rd.west to Loop Rd. 60' 2 No C&G --- -- Sulphur Dr. MA-s Spindletop Ave.west to T.&N.O.RR at 80' 4 No SH -- — LNVA Canal. Sulphur Dr.Ext.west MA-s T.&N.O.RR at LNVA Canal west to 80' 4 No SH — -- Highland Ave.on south side of RR. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru Or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) MA-s West along south side of T.&N.O.RR, 80 4 No SH — -- Use un-named existing street R/W. along Highland to W. Pt.Arthur Rd.at Walden Ext. East. See Walden Rd.Ext.East for westward continuation of corridor. Sycamore St. MC-u 150 north of Doucette south to Madison 70 4 No C&G -- — to the City Limits and the eastern extension of Washington Boulevard. Tolivar Rd. MGs Major Dr.west to Keith Rd. 60' 2 No C&G -- Trahan Rd.Ext.North. MC-r Lawhon Rd.north to Brooks Rd.at S. 100' 2 No SH --- __ Pine Island Road. Trahan—Road.—NC--r— Lawhon Road south to present end. 100 2 No SH — _-- Trahan Rd.-Ext.South. MC-r Present end south to Meeker Rd.Ext. 100' 2 No SH --- — South. Trahan—Road.—MC---r From Meeker Rd.Ext.South extend 100' 2 No SH --- — southwesterly and then south to connect with westward extension of UNR-9b. Tram Rd. SA-s S. H.105 north and east to Tolivar Canal 100' 4 M SH Rd.to N.Major Drive. SA-s From N.Major Dr.east to Old Voth 90' 4 M C&G — -- Road. SA-s Old Voth Rd.east to Eastex Frwy.North 90' 4 CTL C&G -- --- Bound Service Road. SA-s Eastex Frwy.east approximately 1200 90' 4 CTL C&G -- -- feet to turn southeasterly. Tram Rd.-Ext.East. SA-s From approx. 1200'east of Eastex Frwy. 90' 4 No C&G --and on Tram Rd.turn southeast along west side of SF RR and go to Piney Point Ln. See Piney Point Lane for eastward conBnuadon of corridor. Twenty-third St. MC-u Gladys south to Calder. 60 2 No C&G -- -- MC-u Calder south to Phelan to Laurel. 70' 2 CTL C&G MC-s Laurel south to Bristol to SP RR. 60' 1 2 No C&G --- -- Grade Separation at SP RR. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=V shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru of Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) " MC-s SP RR south to College. 70' 4 No C&G --- -- Grade separation at RR. MC-s College south to Washington Blvd. 70' 4 M C&G — – Twin City Hwy.(State Hwy. MA-s MLK Pkwy.(Spur 380)South to ETJ 150' 4 M SH - --- State Standards. 347) Line. Tyrrell Park Rd. MC-s Fannett Rd.south to Frint Road. 60' 2 No C&G — -- Tyrrell Park Rd.-Ext.South MC-s Frint Rd.(old)south to Willow Marsh 60' 2 No C&G --- -- Bridge at bayou. Bayou to Frint Rd.Ext. South. University Dr. MC-u North from E.Lavaca to near Pipkin then 80' 4 M C&G --- 2S Special R/W case. RM/set to match existing R/W to south. east to connect with MLK Parkway. MC-u E.Lavaca south to Alabama to Florida 80' 4 M C&G --- --- to Cardinal. Un-Named Rd.-1A MC-s From Keith Rd.Ext.S.go southeast to 65' 2 No C&G -- --- IH-10 south bound service road. Un-Named Rd.-1 B WC-s From Kidd Rd.@ Smith Rd.go east to 65' 2 No C&G -- -- UNRAA Un-named Rd.-2 MC-s From Baker Rd.Ext.East at Dowlen Rd. 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Re-alignment. Ext.South extend east to connect with IH-10 Service Road. Un-named Rd. 3 MC-s Manion south to Phelan. 60' 2 No C&G --- -- -On-named Rd.-4A MC-s Dishman north and east to N.Major 60' 2 No C&G --- --- at UNR-46. Ni- -On-named Rd.-4B MC-s Major Dr.at UNR�4A east to Delaware 60' 2 o C&G -- --- Ext.West. Un-named Rd.-5A MC-s From Folsom Rd.Ext.West,north 60' 4 No C&G --- --- and then east to UNR-613 just north of drainage area. On-named Rd.-5B MC-s From S.H.105 at or near Lampman 60' 4 No C&G --- --- south then southeast to intersect with UNR-5A and then southeast and east to Old Dowlen Road near utility sub-station and to Parkdale Mall. Un-named Rd.-6 MC-s From Keith Rd.east and then north to 100' 2 No SH --- --- S.H.105. Un-named Rd.-7 MC-s From Major Dr.just north of LNVA Canal 60' 2 No C&G -- --- southwest to Folsom Ext.West. Un-Named Rd.-8 MC-s Chinn at Meadowview north to Tram Rd. 60' 2 No - Ext.East. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway sub-Scrlpt CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned FacHities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14 Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or Ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Un-Named Rd.-9A MC-r S.Boyt Rd.at UNR-9B east and north to 100' 2 No SH — -- Kidd Road. Un-Named Rd.-9B MC-r S.Boyt Rd.west to Meeker Rd.Ext. 100' 2 No SH --- --- South. Un-Named Rd.-9B;westward MC-r From Meeker Rd.Ext.South extend 100' 2 No SH -- -- Would extend beyond ETJ Line to connect with Imes Rd.Exten. extension of. west to ETJ Line. South. Un-Named Rd.-10 MC-r Humble Rd.at Steinhagen south to 100' 2 No SH --- -- UNR-11A to FM 365. Replace this description for MC-r Labelle Rd.easterly to ETJ line west of 100' 2 No SH — --- Un-named Rd.-11 B extends eastward from ETJ line and then south Un-named Rd.-11 A with Hillebrandt Rd.at UNR-11 B. to connect with S.H.365. descriptions shown below Un-named Rd.-11A MC-r From Labelle Rd.easterly to UNR-10. 100' 2 No SH --- Un-named Rd.-11 B MC-r From UNR-10 easterly to ETJ line west 100' 2 No SH --- --- Un-named Rd.-11 B should extend eastward from ETJ line to of Hillebrandt Road. Hillebrandt Rd.and then easterly and south to connect with S.H.365. U Un-named Rd.-12A MC-s From Tram Rd.west of City Limits 60' 2 No C&G -- -- An portion of NR-1 1 B outside the ETJ is however outside the extend south then southwesterly and west to connect with proposed Hardin-Jefferson Parkway at UNR-12B. Un-named Rd.-12B MC-s From UNR-12B at proposed 60' 2 No C&G -- Suggest naming the road River Oaks. Hardin-Jefferson Pkwy.west to connect to Tram Rd.at proposed UNRA4. Un-named Rd.-13 MC-s From Inwood Street in Bevil Oaks east 60' 2 No C&G -- Suggest naming the road Inwood Street. UNR-13 is also listed under and south to connect with UNR-14. Inwood Street Extension East. Un-named Rd.-14 MC-s From River Oaks Blvd.in Bevil Oaks 70' 2 No C&G — Special R/W case. Pavement and R/W set to match existing Bevil extend east and south to connect with Oaks section. Suggest naming the road River Oaks. UNR-14 is Tram Rd.at UNR-12B. also listed under River Oaks Extension East. U.S.Hwy.89,86,&287 Frwy IH-10 east to Twin City Hwy.(S.H.347). Varies 4 M C&G — -- State Standard. Grade separation interchanges at Fannett,4th St., (Cardinal Drive) Erie,W.Pt.Arthur Rd.,MLK Pkwy.,and Twin City Highway. Overpass at Highland. U.S.Hwy.69,96,&287. Frwy Twin City Hwy.southeasterly to FM3514 Varies 4 M SH -- - State Standard. to ETJ line. U.S.Hwy.69,96,&287(See Eastex F U.S.90(See College) Usan St. MC-u Southerland south to Sarah to Virginia. 69 2 No C&G — -- Village Creek Parkway.(See FM 3513) Virginia St.,West MC-u Avenue"A" west to 4th St. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To RM #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Virginia St.,East. MC-u MLK Pkwy.west to Callaghan. 80' 4 M C&G -- --- East Virginia closed through Lamar Univ. Virginia St.East(Cont.) MC-u University west to Highland Avenue. 60' 2 No C&G — --- Walden Rd. MA-s West from Fannett Rd.at Walden Rd.- 12U 4 CTL C&G -- — Ext.East to IH-10 to Dowlen Rd.Ext. South. MA-s Dowlen Rd.Ext.South west to S.Major. 120' 4 M C&G -- --- MA-s S.Major west to Wescalder to Keith Rd. 120' 4 M C&G -- -- Ext.S.to Smith Rd.Ext.North. MA-r Smith Rd.west to S.Pine Island Rd. 150' 4 M SH -- --- Walden Rd.-Ext.West MA-s S.Pine Island Rd.west to Meeker Rd. 150' 4 M SH --- --- Ext.South. Walden Rd.-Ext.East MA-s Fannett Rd.east across Hillebrandt 150' 4 M SH -- -- Bayou to approximately 500 feet west of 4th St.Ext.South. ' MA-s From approximately 500 feet west of 4th 150' 4 M SH -- St.Ext.South go east to 4th St.Ext. South. MA-s From Fourth St.Ext.South,east to Erie 150' 4 M SH --- --- St.to W.Pt.Arthur Rd.at Sulphur Dr. Ext.West. See Sulphur Dr.Ext. West for corridor continuation eastward. Wall Street. MA-u Trinity west to MLK Pkwy. 60' 3 No C&G -- — This is the west bound section of College Street. Washington Blvd. SA-u MLK Pkwy.(Spur 380)west to 4th St.to 90' 4 CTL C&G --- — Grade Separation at SP RR. 11th St.to IH-10 west service road. SA-s IH-10 west service road west to 23 rd. 90' 4 CTL C&G -- St.to S.Major Drive. SA-s S.Major Dr.west to Westcalder to Keith 80' 4 M C&G — --- Rd.Ext.South. Washington Blvd.-Ext.East MC-u MLK Pkwy.(Spur 380)east to 70' 2 No C&G --- Sycamore. Wescalder Dr. MC-s College St.south to Walden Road. 60' 2 No C&G -- West Port Arthur Rd. SA-s Avenue A Ext.S.to Cardinal. 70' 4 No C&G — -- MA-s Cardinal Dr.south to LNVA Canal,to 150' 4 M SH --- --- City limits, FM3514,and to ETJ Line. ROAD CLASS Classification Major Street and Highway Plan Frwy=Freeway Sub-Script CTL=Center turn lane Development Standards Expwy=Expressway u=Urban C&G=Curb and gutter Roadway Classifications& MA=Major Arterial s=Suburban SR=Service Road Planned Facilities Descriptions SA=Secondary Arterial r=Rural 2S=Sidewalks on 2 sides; 1 S=1 sidewalk only. MC=Major Collector O=Optional; Ext.=Road Extention. Adopted: Pkwy=Parkway M=14'Median unless otherwise noted under remarks Ord./Res. No.: SH=8'shoulder on each side of the road Roadway Road- Limits Min. Min. CTL Curbs& Park- Side- Remarks: Name way From-To R/W #Thru or Gutter or ing walks Class. Width Lanes Median Shoulder Lane(s) Westgate Dr. WC--s Shakespeare east to Dowlen. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- MC-s Dowlen Rd.east to Peyton. 60' 2 No C&G — -- Willow St. (1-Way south SA-u CH-10 off ramp at North St.south to 60' 4 No C&G -- -- bound) Broadway. SA-u Broadway south to Laurel. 60' 3 No C&G — --- See Park St.for southward continuation of corridor. Willow Bend Dr. MC-s S.Major Dr.east to Quiet Bend. 70' 4 M C&G --- -- MC-s Quiet Bend south to 753'south of Willow 60' 2 No C&G -- - Place. Willow Bend Dr.-Ext.North MCs Walden Road north to Turnberry to 753' 60' 2 No C&G --- -- south of Willow Place. Willow Bend Dr. MC-s Walden Rd.south to Prestwick Circle. 60' 2 No C&G -- -- Willow Bend Dr.-Ext.South MC-s From Preswick Circle south to Brooks 60' 2 No C&G — -- Road. Willow Creek Drive. MC-s S.Major east approx.350'. 100' 4 M C&G — -- " MC-s 60' 2 No C&G --- --- Winzor Rd. MC-r From Blewett Rd.south to present end. 150' 2 No SH -- --- Winzor Rd.-Ext.South MC-r From present end south across Bayou 150' 2 No SH -- -- Would continue south to FM 365. Changed from SA to MC-r. Din to ETJ Line. Wooten Road —M—Cs College Street(U.S.90)south to 60' 2 No C&G — -- Washington Boulavard. Yorkshire Rd. MC-s College north to present end. 100' 2 No SH -- --- Yorkshire Rd.Ext.N. MC-s Present end west to Meeker Rd.Ext. 100' 2 No SH — -- North. DEVELOPMENT STPA TEGIES PLAN: A Development/Re-Development/Conservation Guide for Beaumont and its Environs. Adopted January , 2003 DEVELaPMENT STRATEGIES PLAN.- A Development/Re-Development/Conservation Guide for Beaumont and its Environs. :r. Prepared by The Planning Division of the Public Works Department Prepared for Beaumont,Texas City Planning and Zoning Commission Laurie Leister, Chapman Greg Dykeman,Vice Chairman Glenn Bodwin Marty Craig Dale A. Hallmark Carlos Hernandez Walter Kyles Dohn LaBiche William Lucas January, 2003 Table of Contents Title Page. Proof of Adoption. Table of Contents. The Development Strategies Plan..........................................................................................l Exhibit"A": The Development Strategies Diagram. DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES PLAN.• A Development/Re Development/Conservation Guide for Beaumont and its Environs. 1000- INTRODUCTION This Plan,which is a component of the Land Use Plan of the City ofBeaumont,consists of the goals, objectives, policies, and improvement proposals of the City Council and City Planning Commission for guiding both short-to-long range physical growth and short-to-intermediate range re-development /conservation actions within the City of Beaumont and the area within Beaumont's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction(ETJ). In addition to this written document, there is a Development/Re-Development / Conservation Strategies Diagram provided in a jacket attached to the back inside cover which graphically illustrates many of the provisions of this plan. That diagram,hereafter referred to as the "Development Strategies Diagram", graphically illustrates how and where the City wishes to see future development, re-development, and conservation actions occur. The map on which these strategies are illustrated shows the area's system of present and potential future major thoroughfares, however it is not to be confused with the adopted Major Street and Highway Plan. These"tools" plus the other adopted components of the Comprehensive Plan are needed in order to insure objectivity, consistency and cost-efficiency in meeting the area's long-range economic growth and social needs. They also make it possible to document and justify decision making in accordance with predetermined and agreed-upon goals, objectives and policies. Although this plan has the recommendation of the City Planning Commission, the adoption of this Plan clearly places the responsibility for establishing development strategies and land use policies with the City Council. This Plan is not an ordinance, a body of regulations, or a precise blueprint for the City's development. It is intended as a guide to aid the Planning Commission and City Council in making decisions concerning how land is to be developed or used and to guide growth. Parcel specific land use decisions are to be made on a case-by-case basis under the City's authorized regulatory powers, such as but not limited to, zoning and land subdivision approval procedures. No r zoning, changes are enacted by the adoption of this plan. The goals, objectives, and policies stated herein and in the development proposals identified on the "Development Strategies Diagram" accompanying this text addresses very broad areas of concern, such as, but not limited to, the long-range direction of the City's growth, the distribution of commercial facilities, higher density housing, the general location of open spaces, and proposed locations of future industrial areas. Adoption of this Plan does not mean that its goals, objectives, and policies are permanent or irreversible. As conditions in the community change and new issues emerge, the Planning Commission and City Council May have to revise,delete, or add to its goals,objectives,and policies or revise the Plan's physical development proposals because they may no longer be desirable or they may prove to be unworkable. To insure that the Plan is kept current and up-to-date, this Plan is to be fully reviewed and re-adopted every two years. 1 2000- GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND PROPOSALS Goals and objectives are considered the cornerstone of any effective planning process. Among other things, goals and objectives are needed to: (1) provide direction to the planning studies; (2) to identify specific areas of concern to be researched and evaluated in the planning process; (3)to provide a mechanism for reflecting public input; and (4)to provide benchmarks for monitoring and evaluating the success of implementation actions. A distinction must, however, be made between goals and objectives. For the purposes of this Plan, a goal is defined as a"general expression" of a desired outcome, while an objective is defined as a"specific end" to be achieved through some form of action taken to achieve a goal. Generally, the more goals which are accomplished by the implementation of any single objective, the higher the priority would be for that particular objective. The actual process of formulating the goals and objectives moves from the general to the specific; first, general goals are formulated; then, after base data is collected and analyzed, the goals and objectives are refined, made more specific and adjusted to be more applicable to the issues and needs that were identified during the preliminary research and analysis phase of the planning process. Finally, in the advanced stages of the planning process, policies are formulated which are intended to provide a means of implementing specific goals and objectives. During the early stages of the preparation of this Plan, preliminary goals and objectives were formulated by the planning staff using the goals and objectives from the original 1982 Land Use Plan, as amended. After the data gathering, preliminary mapping, and analysis phases of the planning process were completed, the assumptions underlying the preliminary goals and objectives were re-evaluated and the goals and objectives were refined and made more specific to present day issues and opportunities. The goals were used to provide a basis for preliminary land use objectives, policies, and proposals addressing the following five major areas of concern: ' General Land Uses; Residential Land Uses; Commercial Land Uses; Industrial Land Uses; and Special Land Use Planning Concerns and Issues. The resulting goals, objectives, policies, and proposals are provided below. Some are also expressed in both written and graphic form on the"Strategies Diagram" accompanying this text. 2100- GOALS * 2101 - PROMOTE AN ORDERLY AND EFFICIENT GROWTH PATTERN. 2 This Plan is based upon the premise that sustained growth of the city is not only desirable but essential to the achievement of the quality of social and economic life desired by residents of the City. The Plan promotes the position that the city should grow in an orderly and efficient manner in order to avoid wasteful over-expenditures for tax- supported capital improvements, avoid depreciation of property values resulting from incompatible land uses and development of environmentally unsuitable areas, and to reserve an ample amount of land for future industrial, commercial, and residential growth, the development of parks and recreational facilities, and the conservation of open space. * 2102 - ACCOMMODATE GROWTH WHILE MINIMIZING ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS. Flooding is a major local concern, particularly since in the past few years unprecedented storm-related floods have disrupted the lives of Beaumont's citizens. In a city with a virtually flat terrain, a very minimal natural drainage system, dense clay-based soils, and a very high annual rate of rainfall, it is unreasonable to assume that flooding can be eliminated. However, through sound land use planning, proper engineering, and an effective capital improvements strategy it is possible to develop new land without worsening existing drainage problems or creating new flood-prone areas. Similarly, it is unlikely that air and noise pollution will ever be totally eliminated but it is possible to prevent further problems caused by pollution by not locating new developments in areas where they would be impacted by such problems or by providing some means to mitigate them. * 2103 - ENCOURAGE EXPANSION AND DIVERSIFICATION OF BEAUMONT'S ECONOMIC BASE. In the past, Beaumont has received attention in national publications as having one of the nation's highest potentials for economic growth. Paradoxically, over the years overall economic growth in the area has been moderate at best, unemployment rates are still higher than most Texas cities, and the economy lacks diversification.' The uncertain future of the oil refining and petrochemical industries, coupled with this area's high level of dependence upon these industries, makes attraction of new industries and commercial establishments an urgent need. Effective land use planning can help stimulate economic growth by reserving adequate sites for new industry and commerce and identifying capital improvements needed to make industrial or commercial sites attractive to potential developers. 'According to the June 1999 issue of"Texas Labor Market Review"the unemployment rate for the Beaumont-Port Arthur Metropolitan Area was high enough to tie for twenty-first place out of 26 Texas Metropolitan Areas with one area not reporting. 3 * 2104 - IMPROVE THE IMAGE AND PHYSICAL APPEARANCE OF BEAUMONT. The physical appearance of a city is the result of a multitude of natural environmental and man-made influences. The city's physical appearance influences the attitudes held toward the city by local residents, potential business and industrial investors, and visitors. During the past two decades, Beaumont has made significant advances in improving the image and visual character of the city through revitalization of inner-city areas, improvement of the quality of new development, and improvements in air and water quality. A continuation of these trends is desired because they would contribute to an even greater positive image for the city and an improved quality of life for its citizens. * 2105 - CONSERVE AND REVITALIZE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. Although development of new land areas is a major concern of this Plan, the conservation and revitalization of the existing built environment is equally important. Many dollars have been invested in housing, businesses, and public facilities throughout the city and the City is responsible for protecting these investments through administration of land use regulations and guidelines(zoning, subdivision, and flood control ordinances), through construction and maintenance of basic public facilities, and through provision of fire, police and sanitation services. The utilization of these City functions, as well as the participation of private investors and individual property owners, can contribute to the continued stability of well-established neighborhoods and the revitalization of declining ones. * 2106 - PROMOTE EXPANSION AND CONSERVATION OF THE HOUSING STOCK. ' Many of the housing units in Beaumont are in poor enough structural condition to warrant replacement or extensive rehabilitation. Many other units which were generally produced prior to 1940 do not meet the needs and desires of families in the market for housing. Added to the housing demand generated by structural deterioration and obsolescence is the continuing need for housing to accommodate population growth. Finally, the changing family structure in our society has resulted in a decline in the number of persons per household and a resulting demand for more housing to accommodate the increased number of households. These trends will result in demand for a variety of housing types. It is likely to result in increased demand for apartments, townhouses, and smaller single- family homes. The Plan must ensure that ample acreage is provided to accommodate such demand. 4 * 2107 - PROMOTE REINVESTMENT IN THE CENTRAL CITY AREA AND THOSE SECTIONS OF THE CITY DESIGNATED AS CONSERVATION/REVITALIZATION AREAS. Continuation of the revitalization of the downtown area and other central city areas are considered very important efforts which this Plan endorses. The development and adoption of plans for specifically designated areas; i.e., neighborhood, corridor, or sector plans, is considered a major priority of the City. 2200- OBJECTIVES 2210- General Land Use Objectives. * To insure compatibility of land uses through the consistent application of the provisions of this Strategies Plan, any officially adopted neighborhood, corridor, or sector plans, the provisions of the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and the City's zoning and subdivision regulations. (Ref. as 2211) * To reduce the impacts of flooding caused by development in and urbanization of area drainage basins. (Ref. as 2212) * To capitalize upon Beaumont's unique natural and man-made urban design assets, such as the riverfront, wooded natural areas, major public properties and water ways, and unique neighborhoods. (Ref. as 2213) * To provide adequate locations for Beaumont's long-range residential, commercial, and industrial growth. (Ref. as 2214) * To provide environmentally sensitive and commercial areas.with adequate protection from ' air, water, noise, and visual pollution. (Ref. as 2215) * To minimize the fiscal costs to the taxpayers and negative social and environmental impacts which may result from new growth. (Ref as 2216) * To promote energy efficiency through the use of good urban design principles in the preparation and approval of subdivision and development plans. (Ref. as 2217) * To promote the development of a variety of housing types and designs as well as encourage variety in the physical design and layout of development projects through the use , where appropriate, of urban design concepts such as cluster development, mixed or multiple use developments, planned unit developments, greenbelt communities, and the like. (Ref. as 2218) 5 2240-Residential Land Use Objectives. * To conserve the existing housing stock and protect residential areas from physical deterioration and encroachment of incompatible land uses. (Ref. as 2241) * To revitalize blighted and declining residential dwellings and their neighborhoods. (Ref. as 2242) * To lower the costs of residential development and to encourage housing production and rehabilitation, particularly within those areas designated on the Strategies Diagram as "Conservation/Revitalization Areas". (Ref. as 2243) * To encourage the building of a wide range of housing types and styles and a diversity in the types of neighborhoods developed throughout the community. (Ref. as 2244) * To provide residential neighborhoods with convenient, easily accessible community facilities and support services that are a customary part of the neighborhood environment. (Ref. as 2245) * To protect residential and neighborhood environments from air, water, noise, and visual pollution. (Ref. as 2246) 2260- Commercial Land Use Objectives. * To provide adequate sites for retail and service-oriented commercial development to serve all parts of the city and, in appropriate situations, to and in neighborhoods. (Ref. as 226 1) * To provide adequate sites and transportation access for wholesale commercial and distribution operations. (Ref. as 2262) * To capitalize upon Beaumont's status as a regional center of commerce, medical services, entertainment, and education. (Ref. as 2263) * To encourage developers to retain as many existing trees on their development sites as possible. (Ref. as 2264) * To improve the aesthetic appearance of all commercial areas but with particular attention given to the commercial activity corridors. (Ref. as 2265) 2280-Industrial Land Use Objectives. 6 * To encourage new industrial development, especially labor-intensive, non-polluting light industries. (Ref. as 2281) * To promote expansion of existing industries including their relocation in order to expand. (Ref. as 2282) * To encourage additional development of the Port of Beaumont and port-related industries and services. (Ref. as 2283) * To,protect residential and commercial areas from industrial air, water, noise, and visual pollution. (Ref. as 2284) 2290 - Special Land Use Issues and Areas of Concern: Objectives * To take special actions and develop special plans to improve the physical, social, and economic environment of the area around Lamar University and the area in and around Downtown which basically should include the area south of Calder to Blanchette between U LK Parkway and the Neches River. (Ref. as 229 1) * To take special actions and develop special plans to protect the natural environment of Hillebrandt Bayou from Fannett Road south and to enhance the recreational use and aesthetic value of that area. (Ref. as 2292) * To take special actions and develop special plans to ensure the provision of green belts for the purposes of providing recreation facilities for walking and cycling, to improve the aesthetic appearance of the city, and to act as buffers between land uses. (Ref. as 2293) * To take special actions and develop special plans for those areas adjacent to the proposed Hardin-Jefferson Parkway which would promote the restriction of direct access to the parkway, minimize signage, and encourage development projects to not front on the parkway (Ref. as 2294). 2300 - POLICIES 2310 - General Planning and Land Use Policies. * Land use decisions are to be considered and approved based upon sound land use principles and urban design concepts and standards, by the comprehensive consideration of all the relevant components of the larger interrelated urban systems, i.e. , the drainage system, the transportation network, public utilities, community facilities, the natural environmental systems, and the provisions of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan. (Ref. as 2311) 7 * The provisions of any officially adopted neighborhood, corridor, or sector plan are to take precedence over the provisions of this Development Strategies Plan. (R.ef. as 2312) * Typically, low density single-family development should make up approximately 75 % of all of the residentially developed land within a neighborhood unit and should be designed in a manner that fosters convenient and safe access to the neighborhood activity center. The remaining residential development or approximately 25% of the total residentially developed land should be medium to high density multi-family development located at the periphery of each neighborhood unit directly adjacent to the major streets. (Ref, as 2313) See exception under item#2320. * The primary functions of the area's drainage ways are considered to be the collection, transportation, and storage of storm water runoff. As a general policy those functions should not be interfered with without the institution of mitigation efforts. Therefore, the flood ways 2 of major drainage ways should be protected by officially requiring that as development approvals are sought and as funds might become available, that land adjacent to such drainage ways are to be surveyed, mapped, and designated as permanent open space corridors with a prohibition on the erection of buildings. Urbanization of the officially designated 100-year flood plain3 should also be prevented in order to avoid worsening flood problems and to prevent the loss of lives and property damage. (Ref. as 2314) * Generally, development is to be encouraged in areas with the fewest environment constraints. However, areas that are in pristine condition and have few environmental constraints may be determined to be more desirable to save than another that is partially developed but having more environmental constraints. (Ref. as 2315) * Land with environmental constraints, such as lands bordering or containing wetlands or waterways, are proposed to be limited to development at very low densities. The use of such land is to be limited only to the extent that such use does not degrade the natural environment to an unreasonable degree and if it does degrade the natural environment, the use of the land would require actions to migrate the negative impacts created by the development. This policy is particularly applicable to areas bordering the Big Thicket National Preserve. (Ref. as 2316) * Growth and development should be encouraged in areas of the city which are already 2 The floodway of a stream is defined as the channel of the stream and the adjoining portions of floodplain which are reasonably required to carry and discharge flood waters. 3 As defined by the most current official Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map. 8 served (or can be economically served) by utilities, drainage, thoroughfares, and other community facilities. (Ref. as 2317) * New development is shown on the accompanying strategies diagram to generally occur in the area between the existing urbanized areas westward to Smith Road, north to Pine Island Bayou, and south to the proposed Mid-County Expressway. Major extensions of city utilities should be conducive to growth in these areas. The entire West Beaumont Oil Field is expected to be available for development by the end of the time frame of this Plan and is therefore so designated. (Ref. as 2318) * A reserve area for long-range urban growth should be maintained in the area generally west of Smith Road as extended south of College, west of Keith Road south of S.H. 105, and in the area west of Winzor and south of Bayou Din. These "growth reserve" areas are shown on the strategies diagram. All development eventually occurring in these areas should meet City engineering design and construction standards. (Ref. as 2319) * Renovation and rehabilitation strategies and the development of architecturally compatible structures typical of those developed in neo-traditional urban developments are encouraged to occur in those pre- 1960 areas of the City which are east and north of Eastex Freeway/U.S. 69. (Ref. as 2320) * The timing of public improvements such as thoroughfares, storm drainage, and utilities should be coordinated with private sector development. (Ref. as 2321) * Annexation decisions should be based upon the goals of maintaining a sound tax base, avoiding unnecessary investment of public funds, and protecting the citizens of Beaumont from the adverse economic and environmental effects of substandard development particularly in the watersheds of the Neches River and Pine Island, Hillebrandt, and Taylor's Bayous. (Ref. as 2322) * As a principle of urban landscape design, this Plan encourages the use of indigenous plant materials as a means of urban beautification and, where possible, as a means of accomplishing erosion control and noise pollution abatement. (Ref. as 2323) 2340 - Residential Land Use Policies. * Future urban residential development projects should be designed and built to fit within the system of spatially defined residential neighborhoods as depicted in the Strategies Diagram. (Ref. as 2341) * A diversity of housing types and designs, built in a manner consistent with the Neighborhood Unit Concept, are to be encouraged in each neighborhood. (Ref. as 2342) 9 * Low-density, single-family development should constitute approximately 75 percent of all developed residential land within typical neighborhood growth units. (Ref. as 2343) * Medium and higher density residential development should not exceed approximately 25 percent of the developed residential land area within a typical neighborhood. (Ref. as 2344) * For physical planning purposes.an overall net residential density of 8.5 dwelling units per acre will be anticipated within the neighborhood growth units. (Ref. as 2345) * Cluster housing and zero lot line development will be permitted in any residential area, with the density being determined by the zoning district in which such development is located. (Ref. as 2346) * Single-family housing should not exceed a maximum net density of 8.7 dwelling units per acre. (Ref. as 2347) * Medium-density residential development (not to exceed 18 dwelling units per net acre) should function as a buffer or transition between major streets, commercial districts, or higher density residential developments and lower density residential areas. (Ref. as 2348) * High density residential development should not exceed 29 dwelling units per net acre except in the CBD and shall be located in activity centers at the intersection of major streets or adjacent to a major street. Such development can function as a buffer or transition between commercial development or heavy automobile traffic and medium density residential development. (Ref. as 2349) * Typically, the density of residential development should decline as the distance increases from major streets or activity centers. (Ref. as 2350) t * Medium and high density residential development, particularly in locations above ground level commercial uses, is to be encouraged in the Central Business District. (Ref. as 2351) * Landscaped open space buffer strips or, where applicable, landscaped drainage corridors should be used as buffers between medium or higher density development of any type and lower density single-family residential areas. (Ref. as 2352) * Traffic in the interior of residential neighborhoods should be limited by routing major streets along the perimeter of neighborhood units and limiting the direct access of single family areas to either local or collector streets. (Ref. as 2353) 10 * Single-family residential development should not be permitted in areas zoned or proposed for commercial or industrial development and, where such uses currently exist, their continued use should not be encouraged unless they are being included in plans for a neo- traditional style development. (Ref. as 2354) * Medium and higher density residential development should be permitted in areas zoned or proposed for general commercial but not industrial development. (Ref. as 2355) * Residential development in the 100-year flood-plain should be discouraged and limited to non-urban densities(less than one unit per net acre). (Ref. as 2356) * Residential development in designated adverse noise zones around the airport 4 should be limited to non-urban densities of less than 1.0 units per net acre. (Ref. as 2357) * Churches and schools which are customarily apart of the total residential neighborhood environment should be permitted in low-density single-family residential areas only after a public hearing and City Council approval. (Ref. as 2358) * Elementary schools should be combined with neighborhood parks and located near the center of neighborhood units with surrounding land uses limited to low-density single-family residential development. ' (Ref. as 23 59) * Child care centers, halfway houses, and other social service facilities should not be permitted in low density single-family residential areas, but may be permitted in medium or higher density residential areas only after a public hearing and City Council approval. (Ref as 2360) * New residential development at densities higher than one unit per acre should be prohibited in the 100-year floodplain. (Ref. as 2361) f 2370- Commercial Land Use Policies. * Commercial development will be encouraged in the Central Business District by reducing regulations and offering economic incentives, on a project-by-project basis, in order to provide the area with competitive development advantages. (Ref. as 2371) * Limitations will not be established on the height of commercial structures except for neighborhood commercial and office park zones. (Ref. as 2372) 4 As identified in Airport Master Plan. 5 Not applicable to neo-traditional planning principles. 11 * Neighborhood convenience commercial development' should be located in the periphery of residential neighborhoods and on a major street at, or in proximity to, the intersection of two major streets.' (Ref. as 2373) * Office park developments are to be considered as good buffers or appropriate transitional uses between both commercial and light industrial development and residential development. (Ref. as 2374) * Planned shopping center development will be the preferred form of future commercial development and should be limited to "activity corridors" and to the intersections of major streets in "activity centers", subject to public review and City Council approval. (Ref. as 2375) * New strip or ribbon highway commercial development will be limited to "activity corridors". (Ref. as 2376) * Landscaped open space buffer strips should be required between commercial and residential development. (Ref. as 2377) 2380-Industrial Land Use Policies. * Development of industrial parks for light industry and distribution should be promoted. (Ref. as 2381) * Industrial parks meeting industrial performance criteria should be less restricted as to their locations than general or heavy industry. (Ref. as 2382) * The use of office and industrial parks as buffers or transitions between residential development and general industrial development is a policy of this plan. (Ref. as 2383) i * Areas proposed for industrial development will be protected from encroachment or invasion by residential development. (Ref. as 23 84) * New industrial development, will be encouraged in existing industrial zoning districts along Cardinal Drive, Eastex Freeway and Interstate 10 and in the Mobil Chemical Plant area west of the Municipal Airport. (Ref. as 2385) ' Small-scale convenience type retail and service uses as permitted in the NC "Neighborhood Commercial"classification of the Zoning Ordinance. 'Not applicable to neo-traditional planning principles. 12 * Warehousing and distribution centers and restricted light industry will be permitted in "activity corridors", subject to public review and City Council approval. (Ref. as 2386) * New industries which create air pollution should be located in areas that minimize their impact upon existing and future residential areas. (Ref. as 2387) 2390- Special Issues and Areas of Concern: Policies. * It is the policy of this Plan to encourage the expansion of port and port-related industrial development into suitable areas adjacent to, across the river from, and along the river generally south of the Port of Beaumont. (Ref. as 2391) * Any proposed"In-fill" development should be compatible with surrounding uses s and be "in harmony" 9 with the existing architectural character of the area. To achieve those goals, in-fill development may: 1). replicate an adjacent or nearby building or structure with regard to design, scale, materials, and color; 2). closely duplicate an adjacent or nearby building or structure with regard to design, scale, materials, and color; 3). be of the same style and period of architecture but use a different design, color, or choice of materials in its construction while still maintaining architectural sensitivity with regard to scale and harmony with its surrounding; or 4). be of a different style and architectural period, scale, color, and material composition from its surroundings but maintaining both use compatibility and architectural sensitivity with its surroundings. (Ref. as 2392) * It is the policy of this Plan that approvals of in-fill development projects10 be based on consistency with any officially adopted goals, objectives, policies, and proposals for the area in which the in-fill project is located. (Ref. as 2393) * It is the policy of this Plan that future development projects along the proposed Hardin- Jefferson Parkway not front on or have direct access to the parkway and that special efforts are to be made in establishing and maintaining this future north-south 8 Maintaining compatibility with existing uses does not necessary require the same use as nearby structures but does require that there not be a great contrast between the type and time of use of the in-fill development and that of the existing surrounding uses. 9 Maintaining harmony with existing structures does not require duplication of nearby structures but does require that there not be a great contrast between the in-fill development and the existing surroundings. 10 In-fill development refers to"new"development(uses,buildings,and structures)being placed on a vacant parcel of land within an area that is basically surrounded by existing buildings or structures and uses. "New" is intended to mean"new to the site"so the development may be of new construction or a moved in building or structure. 13 transportation corridor as a commercial free, natural appearing landscape composed of native vegetation and physical features such as canals and bayous to buffer all developed areas adjacent to the parkway. (Ref. as 2394) * It is also the policy of this Plan that the objective of providing a north bound, access controlled transportation corridor for hurricane evacuation needs is considered to be paramount to all other objectives in building the future proposed Hardin-Jefferson Parkway. (Ref. as 2395) 2400- PROPOSALS 2410- General Planning and Land Use: Proposals. In order to promote accessibility, orderliness, and efficiency of the form and spatial organization of the community, this Plan provides for the development of a hierarchical system of"activity centers or areas",11 and"activity corridors". The following descriptions of these facilities, listed in order of density of development from lowest to highest, are identified on the Development Strategies Diagram accompanying this text. Along the bottom portion of the Strategies Diagram are graphic illustrations of the range of uses which are potentially a part of each activity center or area. Neighborhood Activity Centers: A non-commercial activity center composed of an elementary school and a neighborhood park which is located in the approximate graphical center of a neighborhood. It can also contain some social service facilities for the residents of the neighborhood. Although located on a collector street, the area is intended to be primarily oriented to pedestrian and bicycle accessibility. District Urban Activity Centers: A combination commercial and non-commercial activity center located at major thoroughfare intersections at the approximate geographical center and convergence of three to five neighborhoods. Commercial uses include neighborhood shopping centers, professional offices, and businesses selling convenience goods or providing personal services such as barber shops and beauty parlors. The goods and services offered are primarily intended to serve those persons residing in the adjacent neighborhoods and persons visiting those neighborhoods. Non-commercial uses in a district include recreational facilities, churches,junior high or middle schools, branch libraries, public safety facilities, and higher density residential developments. Community Urban Activity Centers: A combination commercial and non-commercial activity u An Activity Center consists of clusters of mixed-use facilities and do not represent a single building or complex. The legend of the Development/Re-development/Conservation Diagram accompanying this text indicates the range of uses which are potentially a part of each type of activity center. 14 center located at major thoroughfare intersections at the approximate geographical center and convergence of three to five districts. The community center, as a development concept, is essentially the same as a district center but expanded and refined in function, size, and service capacity. Commercial uses include community shopping centers, office complexes, and businesses providing personal or professional services. Non-commercial uses would include satellite health clinics, high schools, churches, community recreational facilities, and higher density residential developments. Regional Urban Activity Centers: These centers are located at interchanges of major circumferential and radial freeways or expressways near the approximate geographical center of each region. These centers contain major retail commercial businesses and non-commercial facilities that may include regional shopping centers, major office complexes, governmental agencies, branch libraries, hospitals, and higher density residential developments. Urban Activity Corridors: These proposed activity corridors provide for mixed urban and suburban type uses adjacent to Interstate 10, Eastex Freeway, U.S. Highway 90, and on Cardinal Drive. This plan provides for 17 activity centers made up of 3 District Centers; 9 Community Centers; and 2 Regional Centers. In addition, three"special districts" are identified; one for the area in and around the old CBD; another identifying a university district surrounding Lamar University; and a third district encompassing the concentration of medical and professional offices extending from IH-10 down Eleventh Street to College and east to near Fourth Street. The plan further includes five tunes of urban areas: Neighborhood Growth Units which are intended to act as cellular "building blocks"for future neighborhood development; Stable Areas are those developed areas which are basically in good condition and free from blighting influences. These areas may have some remaining development sites available; Conservation/Revitalization Areas which are areas having need for some to a substantial amount of improvement in its buildings or structures and/or public infrastructure; Heavy Industrial Areas; and Industrial/ f Distribution/Office Park Areas. For non-urban areas the Strategies Diagram identifies the following four types of areas: Agricultural Areas; Low Density Rural Development Areas, Growth Reserves, and Open Space Areas. Descriptions of each of the above urban and non- urban areas are provided below. Other uses shown are transportation/utilities, green belts and major parks, open spaces, and major public facilities. "Neighborhood Growth Units" are intended to accommodate Beaumont's needs for new residential neighborhoods and related shopping areas and community facilities for the next two to three decades. Neighborhood growth units may be developed along the line of either of the below described development models or design concepts. Use of the more"Contemporary Neighborhood Design Concept" which has been 15 Beaumont's development model since 198212 provides for a diversity of housing types and convenient access to parks, schools, and shopping centers while still protecting single-family residential areas from intrusions of incompatible land uses and vehicular traffic. The contemporary model provides, among other things, for the separation of land uses by placing low-density housing around a central core feature, composed of an elementary school and park, with commercial and higher density residential uses placed near the outer boundaries of the neighborhood which is set within a curvilinear and cul-de- sac street pattern, generally with off-street parking and few or no sidewalks, and lots "without" rear access via an alley. The New Urbanist model or"Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Design Concept"13 which provides for a diversity of housing types with at least some mixing of land uses, generally on a main street commercial area fronting a community commons,but also within residential areas where special conditions and regulations exist. Further characteristics include a rectilinear or modified grid street pattern along with alleys and sidewalks, as well as the extensive use of various lot sizes, setbacks, and internal and peripheral green spaces. The design may also include public transit facilities as a major element of the design.14 "Stable Areas" are the built-up areas of the city which are generally characterized by good and excellent structural housing conditions and neighborhoods free from blighting influences such as an incompatible mix of land uses, abandoned buildings, and street layouts inappropriate for residential development. These areas may have vacant parcels which can be developed. Zoning and capital improvement policies and actions should protect these stable areas from blighting influences. "Conservation/ Revitalization Areas" are the areas of the city where immediate action is needed to prevent or reverse deterioration. These areas are characterized by fair to poor housing conditions, some to significant mixtures of incompatible land uses and declining numbers of housing units and small businesses. Recommended approaches to conserving and revitalizing these areas should be based on adopted renovation, rehabilitation, and re-development policies applicable to the following: 12 A neighborhood design concept by Clarence A.Perry and first described in the Regional Survey for New York and its Environs which was published in 1929 by the Russell Sage Foundation. 13 As promoted by advocates such Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk and many others. 14 For discussion of design concepts see The New Suburb: Analysis and Trends published by the Center for Urban Transportation Studies and School of Architecture and Urban Planning,University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee,July, 1991. 16 * the maintenance and re-establishment of housing and businesses in the area; * the improvement of public facilities, utilities, and streets; * the development and implementation of neighborhood plans; * the procedures to be used in and purposes for conducting zoning and land use studies in these areas; and * the implementation of spot-demolition and redevelopment programs in severely deteriorated areas. "Growth Reserves" are areas recommended as potential long-term expansion areas for the city. .These areas are included within Beaumont's official extra-territorial jurisdiction and should be protected from substandard development which would threaten Beaumont's long-term growth prospects. "Open Space Areas": are areas where development at urban intensities is inappropriate, such as wetlands, swamps, marshes, and the banks of natural waterways and water bodies; areas with development limitations and hazardous environmental conditions, such as poor soil or sub-soil conditions, 100-year flood plains, and geological faults; areas having special characteristics that need protection from development, such as unique animal and plant habitats, ground water re- charge areas, or historical sites; and man-made features such as cemeteries, golf courses, and natural resource extraction areas which provide visual open space due to the particular use of the property. " Low Density Rural Areas" are areas that could not be economically served with City utilities and therefore are intended to not be developed to urban intensities. The type of uses permitted would range from residential to commercial to light industrial, however, the density of development should be limited. "Rural Settlements"which are found in non-urbanized areas; generally, at a T-intersection or at the crossroads of two rural type roads which have a small store or church and a small number of residential dwellings of varying building and lot sizes. These settlements are surrounded by agricultural or forest uses. Rural settlements may also be found in the urban fringe of a city in which case agricultural pursuits may have declined or be declining and the physical layout and uses of land may be undergoing change due to development pressures resulting from a greater economic and social connection with the nearby city or town. The sense of place associated with a rural settlement in such a location is often much less than that generally characterized by a more rural location where visual focal points might still be found. Buildings and dwellings in the smaller settlements and in more remote locations will generally have on-site well water and waste water systems whereas a larger settlement, particularly if it is near an incorporated city is likely to have some form of public water system and possibly a public sewerage system. Development within or near rural settlements should occur in a manner that maintains the existing character of the settlement or, where adopted, supports the provisions of an official plan for the area. These areas should be developed in a manner that fosters a sense of place rather than duplicating suburban sprawl. 17 "Agricultural Areas" are areas historically associated with and expected to remain, for the foreseeable future, in agricultural uses. Development incentives are to be developed as follows: * Incentives should be provided to encourage energy conservation and efficiency in the layout of subdivisions. * Incentives and technical assistance should be provided to encourage developers to retain some trees on development sites. "Office/Warehouse/Distribution Parks". Characteristically, an office/warehouse/ distribution park involves a relatively large site that has been planned and developed with a campus like setting and is intended to be operated as a functionally integrated and aesthetically well designed and controlled environment featuring extensive landscaping, a unified architecture, on-site parking, limited usage of signs, attractive lighting, and possibly continuing tenant services for grounds maintenance and security. Such parks are intended to have excellent access to one or more transportation facilities necessary to serve the traffic demands of an area of concentrated office buildings or warehouse/distribution facilities or a combination of such uses, i.e. major highways and rail, ship, and air transport facilities. Uses incidental but necessary to the predominant uses in these parks and the support facilities required to serve the population working in or visiting the area may also be found there. Such incidental or support uses are intended to serve the immediate neighborhood, not the community at large. 2440-Residential Land Use Proposals * This Plan proposes to accommodate most of the future residential growth and development in the community by providing for a series of geographically disbursed neighborhood growth units. Lower density single-family residential development is proposed to make up approximately 75 percent of all developed residential land within each neighborhood growth unit with remaining development being higher density multi-family development located at the periphery of each unit directly adjacent to major streets. (Ref. as 2441) * The Plan proposes that higher density residential development be in activity corridors, the University District, the CBD area, and in regional, community and district centers. (Ref. as 2442) * High-rise multi-family residential development is proposed for the Central Business District. (Ref. as 2443) 18 2460-Commercial Land Use Proposals * This Plan provides for "activity corridors" along Interstate 10, Eastex Freeway, Cardinal Drive, and U.S. Highway 90 which would permit general commercial development. New strip or ribbon commercial development on streets other than designated "activity corridors" is not proposed and is contrary to the city's official commercial development policies. (Ref. as 246 1) * The plan also provides for a hierarchical system of"activity centers" to provide development opportunities for a broad geographic range and variety of shopping centers and miscellaneous retail and service activities. Two regional "activity centers" which would include regional shopping centers are proposed in the plan. One regional center includes the already developed Parkdale Mall located on the Eastex Freeway while another regional center might be developed near the intersection of Brooks Road and Interstate 10. (Ref. as 2462) * The plan identifies three"special districts"; the old Central Business District or downtown Beaumont to be the banking, government, professional office, and convention and entertainment center of Beaumont, a university district around Lamar University, and a medical/office district along Eleventh Street from IH-10 south to College and east to Fourth Street. These are areas identified as having unique and specialized development opportunities. (Ref. as 2463) 2480- Industrial Land Use Proposals. * It is proposed that the area along the extension of Walden Road eastward of Fannett Road to West Port Arthur Road be developed as a warehousing/distribution center. (Ref. as 2481) * The area south of Washington Blvd. to the LNVA canal between IH-10 and the future southward extension of Dowlen Road is proposed as an area for light industrial uses. For the areas south of the LNVA Canal to Brooks Road between IH-10 and the southward extension of a line along the extension of Dowlen Road is proposed as an area for office park and warehouse distribution uses. (Ref. as 2482) Another area of office park and warehousing/distribution facilities is proposed north of the Municipal Airport between Keith Road and Gentry Road. (Ref. as 2483) * This plan proposes to continue to allow future industrial expansion in existing industrial districts along Cardinal Drive, Interstate 10, and the Eastex Freeway. (Ref. as 2483) * This Plan proposes to include a small area of current industrial zoning on the east side of 19 Eastex freeway between Oakcrest and the LNVA Canal to be included in an"activity corridor"which would permit light industrial development but only after public review and City Council approval. (Ref. as 2484) 2490- Special Issues and Areas of Concern: Proposals * The revision and re-adoption of this Development Strategies Plan and Diagram to provide for development incentives to encourage the achievement of specific goals and objectives within this plan is proposed to be completed by the end of the year 2001. (Ref. as 2491) * It is intended that the currently adopted future transportation corridor identified as the Mid-County Expressway be continued westward and northward from IH-10 to extend to U.S. 69 in Hardin County in order to serve an additional north bound hurricane evaluation route and that said corridor is to be developed as a commercial free, sign restricted, landscaped, limited access parkway. (Ref. as 2492) * Development and adoption of a Master Plan for Downtown Beaumont including that area west to MLK Parkway is desirable no later than the end of the year 2002. (Ref. as 2494) * To develop incentives to encourage developers to retain some existing trees on their development sites. (Ref. as 2495) 20 DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES DIAGRAM OPEN SPACE AREAS.Areas when R le efiher undesirable CONTEMPORARY ortaaPpraMt•ref°r°�.° °e< °m°wee.naa RESOLUTION swamps,marshes,and the banks M natural waterways and water bodice,■swell as a,.ae with dsvelopm rot Ilmltallo- NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEMPORARY NEIGHBORHOOD DESHIN and haurdous environmental andMe-,such a poor soil or WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission re cognizes its responsibilities a provided for in Sec.2-32 of CONCEPT-This model allows for•diversity M sob-all condNlos,100-year food plot-,and geological STABLE AREAS-BuM up araa which an the City Code for with regard to its duty lo make studies and Plolect plans for Ys Improvement of the City. hoofing types■rd conveMeM aeea•to Pork', fault.,and also areas having special characteristics mat need generally characterized by good to excellent with a view as to Its future development and extension;and. GROWTH UNIT hods,and shopping l-Mos white suit 1".of rap habitation from development such a, agw animal and wain ®etruct free m blight and-phboNaade Not sin gle�amly residential areas from inbuslons of haDltah,grouts water ntheryo once,,-b,.p,.•erves,or fro Me from baghllrg Initeenca such as WHEREAS,such plans standards ere needed M ceder for the CortvMaslon lo make recoxneMetlo- incompatlble land uses and-hlculertrafe.it historical•flea.M■wrhad.Nato,.,such as cemeteries,golf khcompotlble IoM uses,dilapidated an cloud b the City Council on all maters for the development and advancement M the City's facilities.layout.and provides,among other for the separation of courses,medims M highway.,a-ls,and mtunl nwurce buildings and a deta"oraled or poor public appeeana;arid, - land uses by placing low-0snsfy housing around a axtndlo areas which provide visual open space due to the Infrastructure.Vacant parcels which may exist antral core feature,composed M an elementary particular use Mite property also an considered a,.good to excellent development star. WHEREAS,the City Planning Canndssion intends that there be coordination In the development and school and park with commercial and higher as open space_roes. redevelopment efforts of the city and be private sector in Oder to provide for the growth and density residential usa placed new the outer redevelopment needs of the enure eo-rxxiV.and. boundadss of the neighborhood which k set within v ,{� ■cuMllmar and eul•deaae sVeet patiem, \ - oo$o CONSERVATION/RMTAlIIAT10N AREAS- WHEREAS,the City Purnkp Commission has reviewed Ws,Development Skalegies Diagram a an It with t parking and few-no o Bunt up areas where a sigolfcant Porto"of tire dement d the Comprehensive Plan at a public hearing held thereon;end, s. ® sidewalks,and lob"withouC mar faeces via an \ oo arse N experiencing Influences such as Oersilka alter. - Incompatible land ua,,dilapidated and degct WHEREAS,lee City Planning Con Mss!°,.has studied,debated,and has concluded that k shouts structure•,•detsri•rat ng W pe"public recommend the adopto M lee Plan herein presented; s'� ". --•.."�. Infrastructure,and a dea-In population and in the number M housing unit.and tensionless. NOW.THEREFORE.be t resolved by the City Planning Commission that It recommends ends to is City Immeaat.actions a,.needed to prevent Council M the City of Beaurrhonl Net add Pten be adopted n a component of the Corrprohenslvs Plan v. ; eonNnuatl datariorahenartsbnave—arts,.palr of lee City M BeehanonC and a o Noss conditions. On BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED Nat said Plan shall guide tiro MiWeme istim OF the capital Improvement program insofar as said program effects the physical development of the City. PASSED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Beaumont this day 0f 2001 Chairman, Beaumont Planning Commislon Date e N .: Date: City nc .t Council Resolution/Ordina o x / j Date Mayor Evelyn M.Lord r Big Thicket 0 1 2 Miles LOW DENSITY RURAL AREAS-Ana n 1 whin development at urban densities b 1 / NIhN uMalnbN,kuppropdat.,wthe y This map wee prepared by the staff M lee Planing Division using 7ifiiiiiiis E!::... i��.. 1 Pine Forest Awvt"astT software and tannin data mission. eco courtesy of the proY!s!om M urtmn sr.HCce chi facNM's ; / / were"East Texas Regional Ptemhkhp Commission.Bemuse donee, an determined b M economluity / 1 were made to bole is scab d On various digital files used and 6* uniuemabb. Such area shaded he - •andstepm of nvlype of M°••ai q psid on 1`� `.. I 4----�_ _I location M features a shown°n the rasutkp map.idea 1-p h to be • -. . � w-Wered nothing son tun a grapnmal representation d the h feshira shown for the area.The map Is truna/ore not aft for n•umng from Nat ace.O°-mty,Mete - :. ,,... �� taking measurements or estabtshi boundaries. No repmeda- usa■re kaandad(or very low ds-Ily t i dons orwarrandes with regard b accuracy or completeness d the uses.wch as into trod mldentlal uws, t ____ ______ ________ Intem rdw depicted en Idea map ls Intended. recreational camps,small t.rmabads ant I n 1 �''".' I r tlmitad■grkuitwal sues. Commarclal, tl fight Industrial uld a armed to my On iii;i t / i of Beaumont Plannin Division of the 1€i:E Prepared b the City g ratios should be pro t.very low P Y ape II h ;•:;•;.::.:•: j iiii5iiii:. -• .':ii..i:. ro-: devatopmem de-Idee provided roar , � ti t3ew ale ... •;. .�.:...,::. :�::: :.:..... ...::..:.:.:::�: ,,: .'.:::.:.I.:.::,,:..,, - - r Department of Economic Development November 2002 e-Ironmetallmpactsa,.edMmeioran Recorded at the Jefferson County ourthouse be made minimal. oo° tY It Date: File �iii€` i 00 tl I::::�:is .•:.•:. :;:::::��:::::;:::��_::: 88e � Volume#:N/A Page#:NIA Map Records — _ lip �i�� $$OO°00000000 0000 `1 n i°oo°oeee00000$eeeo 1 FEATURES OTHER MAP F RES U 1 00000 000it 00000 0 0 od0000 N _ V�oo oeeoeo 0000 o ee$00000 t '°o°o°oo$0000 0 0 00 000000000eeoo ° 1 � 00000000000 °o°o BIG THICKET MUMS 000 fee oo 00 00 I 00000000$00 00 1 Vidw � oo�000000 _ I °°Oeoe$°o°o°o°o°o } 1 - - GREENBELTS b MAJOR PARKS oeO° 'ore$ Rose C' rt eta o$°o$$$oo 0 i 00000 is 0000000 I OFFICE PARE/ o00 0 it I i DISTRIBU C TER- TMo Ed see 00 000 0° 1 PU euc Areas s I reed Meal it pa Y designed t and 6ulit to h i t _ provide hg ' E'iiiii�i;i� .::..�.:..:..:.:.... :......... .. 0000° Nu lief velopmanl in t 0 00o I •nedr.11kw.lendee „hid fe111— $o oeo ....�- ._—._. . ..:..........::... _��r= TRANSPORTATION rm.. ————— MAJOR STREETS(FUTURE) ::.:....::. 0 °oeo ' -------------- BEAUMONT ETJ a00000 // 1 Ae0000--••••-o y°y °e°e°e°o°ee°e ^�io°o$°0 0o i I 0000 0o E°o 000000 o°oeo 0o dw BEAUMONT CORPORATE LIMITS II I eoe 000 00000e a 00000 e L i 0°0 00 °o°oo 000 eL i coo °OO°0000 0 00 °o o°o°o°o°o°0 0 000 E CORPORATE LIMITS 00 000000 0 OTHER 00 0000000 0 oeo e I.z I � - I ::a I o8 osoo°000000 Ooee o o °o°o °o 000 °o NM/ieNM FUTURE PARKWAY I L _ 0 0000 000000° 0 0 0•• 1 U OUtB €' Approximate R e0000000 0 000 r . 1 �. � APP L 00 00 0 I L I 00 °O ��p^pp�� 0000 O 009' I I I 000 1 I RE EXPRESSWAY E IJ �:�:?:iii::iii °o°o°o FUTURE 00 r ::::1 1 ICh oo°o 1 i 000 000 L l iiii< [ii t RAI RO AD Ir 1 i 1 — I 1 1 / t / , 1 1 I € r GROWTH RESERVES- l / f i+. Ands mcommended es I `.,� / ��/ t r i .• J M:en urban expansion 1 r 'T 17 i go; pp MTR i •1 r _ I . I s I 1 ' / 1 qPI If t • ! Nederland RURAL ETfLEMENT -These an found In non-«banked ands• .geMnlly,at a T-mtenscdon `, •.._.... ` �':�i�::�<:i:5i:i::: .�:.:�<.:.r:.i<.>:.:t3 .:::::• �. ... 1 1 «H the crossroads of two rural type roads which I \ 1 � •::...:..:.:... •....::.�::..::.:`ii� ..:::. � a '�, / :.y:.:. ...:::.:•... :.o-:.rt:.r:.:.•::. ::r::r::: bare umah atop or church and•small number of - I \ � ! ! • rssldenllal dwellings of w balNh and lot — ! rags varying rag ! Was. The settlements an surrounded by ulturtl«forest used. Dew mwhhln« agrk IoPO'e \'•i:is mar hould ammr l tool aaSNmenta a oeau br a m I mat rrralntalns Ste extstlnq ehancter of do I I Ir, settlement«where adopted.supports the i' . s provisions Of an ofhdd plan for Me area.The" I `` --;, :r:•:•o-r�»»>:::;5:;:::p;:; , ) '�"">:.�::;:.::: :x•::<::�:i 1 / areas should be dewieped In•manor mat fosters t •� /` I —— a dens$«p ts n rather than duel W W suburbm _. — J sprawl.. - -- - r — t 1 Port Arthur .:......... .. N EO-TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN CONCEPT _ Dewlopmem of neighborhood grown units In general accordance with the neotradmonal r - motlelwoWdprorlMf wadhenityof MUemg types whha thastaome mixing or land uses, ACTIVITY CENTER CONCEPT senerslly on a main street rxunmercl I ma Ironing a community commons,but also under _ got :I-g with whale red sidewalks,areas.well a.tnee pens«mse oFv gdd ebeei paSem r ha used.long with.gays arse sitlawalks,H w.h as me extensive use avallOM lot sized, URBAN 1 May lrraude neighborhood shopping centers,professional offices, setbacks,m0 Ndamal and padpnanl groan spaces.TM design may also dour la public `--------------------'- �um DISTRICT CENTER recrendonal fadntlea,junior high schools,churches.branch libraries, Innate facilities I to n major element of the ensign. fire stations,arrd higher density resider"development. NON-URBAN Mewcamec0pfS1' NEIGHBORHOOD GROWTH UNIT abdmola churdms,oNkecomplexeCss,convmu yarecr emtionaalifaadue s. OPEN SPACE c COMMUNITY CENTER endhigher density residential development. ' va,',cr01w' STABLE AREA GROWTH RESERVE -cermmr�sL r May Include hospitals.branch shopping a gore and high agencies,ensit major aw®nu �owl office conrpbxes,replmW ahapping omen.and higher density residential 100i 11' 8o0000 CONSERVATION AND REVITALIZATION REGIONAL CENTER development. O Lsrsoo'�"w �^ ° � LOW DENSITY RURAL DEVELOPMENT ® OFFICE PARK 1 DISTRIBUTION ® The Central Business Mulct may sidude downtown men bade,loud traei 11rstl im.m jor cone ntIm end nuralc ei centers.recreational erea•hotels.loudst fadWNa.major facilities.oonwntlon end jog gov rnment ies. T end AGRICULTURE entenaFmmdand my«gowrmrentolficea. Theuniwniry SPECIAL DISTRICT District may h'riude shopping faclNka•recreational and entertainment LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ® major facilities sin higher;and medical serA a The Medicc r,Mke office Includes 1 major hospitals;ens ngfaales. ,tloa«olikee,mepr once AhdN Tharwghfem RURAL SETTLEMENT conrolezea and arroegog faotSks. Red Team Llae. ar HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY CORRIDOR ditributingandwarehor operationa�restridedyhtIdiw�y,Mbunkress offices.hotels and motels and higher density residential development. 5 January 7, 2003 Consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for the Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements `UO%W' City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Joseph G. Majdalani, Water Utilities Manager MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: December 26, 2002 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for the Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends approval of a contract with Gulf Coast Electric, Beaumont, Texas, in the amount of$95,000 to provide primary feed to the medium voltage switchgear and feed to the 480 Volt system on the water treatment plant's high service pump station. Gulf Coast Electric is a minority business enterprise; therefore,the City's MBE goal will be met. BACKGROUND The ground storage tank under construction is 75%complete, and is scheduled to be in service by April 2003. This new ground storage tank will house several pumps that should supply adequate water volume and pressure to the City. The modifications to the electrical sub-station are necessary to provide the new pumps with the required electrical demand. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds for the project are available in Water Utilities Division Capital Improvements. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Public Works Director, and Water Utilities Manager. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Approve/Deny a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for the Water Treatment Plant High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements project. Freese ctncl N i c h o Ls, Inc. Engineers Environmental Scientists Architects 4055 International Plaza,Suite 200 . Fort Worth,Texas 76109 817 735-7300 817 735-7493 fax www.Ifreese.com December 20, 2002 City of Beaumont ( ry A 1350 Langham Road Beaumont, Texas 77707 , ATTN: Mr. Joseph G. Majdalani, P.E. Water Utilities ie anager RE: City of Beaumont WTP High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements Recommendation of Award of Contract Mr. Majdalani: On Thursday, December 19, 2002, bids were opened for the referenced project. Three bids were received for this project, with Gulf Coast Electric being the apparent low bidder. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached for your use. Based on our reference check of the City of Nederland's WWTP Electrical System Improvements project and Gulf Coast Electric's performance on that project to date, as well as the favorable history the City of Beaumont has had with this firm on previous projects, it appears that the firm is experienced and capable of performing the work included in this project.After consideration of all of the above information, we recommend that the City of Beaumont award the WTP High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements contract to Gulf Coast Electric in the amount of$95,000.00. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Sincerely, FREESE AND NICHOLS, 1 C. rence P Eckersley, P Construction Services Ma ge Associate Attachments xc: Office File BMT00151 R-4.21 T:\Cs\ROA-Beaumont-BMT00151.doc FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. Gulf Coast Electric Brystar Contracting,Inc. Boyer,Inc. High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements 2005 Pecos Street 8385 Chemical Road 9318 Reid Lake City of Beaumont Beaumont,Tx.77701 Beaumont,Tx.77705 Houston,Tx.77064 19-Dec-02 409-833-2828 409-842-6768 713466-5395 Description Quantity Unit Price Total Quantity Unit Price Total Quantity Unit Price Total 1 Furnishing,construction and installation of all electrical modifications and all Improvements as shown or specified in the contract docs.And all support work for a complete and operating system 1 LS $ 95,000.00 $ 95,000.00 1 LS $ 102,800.00 $102,800 1 LS $ 155,806.00 $ 155,806.00 2 Trench Safety System NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 1.00 NO BID 1 LF $ 1.00 $ 1.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID $ 95,000.00 $ 102,800.00 $ 155,807.00 ayO'6�%L 001 r dfOjPy 6 January 7,2003 Consider approval of a contract with BUILD, Inc., Beaumont Main Street City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Andrea S. Deaton, Budget Officer MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: December 19, 2002 REQUESTED ACTION: Approve a contract for $25,000 with BUILD, Inc., Beaumont Main Street, for the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003 to be funded through the General Fund, Economic Development Department. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends entering into a contract with BUILD, Inc., Beaumont Main Street to further economic growth in downtown Beaumont. BACKGROUND The Beaumont Main Street program has established a partnership between the public and private sectors that is dedicated to the revitalization of Beaumont's historic Central Business District. The annual contribution from the City will be matched with other local funds and used to promote downtown business development and retention. BUDGETARYIMPACT Funds are available for economic development purposes in the FY 2003 General Fund budget. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION Upon execution of a contract, payments will be made on a reimbursement basis. Contract with BUILD, Inc. Meeting: January 7, 2003 Page 2 RECOMMENDED BY City Manager RECOMMENDED MOTION Approve/Deny entering into a contract for $25,000 with BUILD, Inc., Beaumont Main Street for the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003. *CONVENE MEETING OF THE BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION 1. Council consider a resolution authorizing the donation of funds to the City of Beaumont in the amount of$15,497.51 to be used for educational purposes at the Beaumont Public Libraries City of Beaumont Board Agenda Item TO: Beaumont Housing Finance Corporation Board of Directors FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kandy Daniel, Treasurer MEETING DATE: January 7, 2003 AGENDA MEMO DATE: January 3, 2003 REQUESTED ACTION: Board consider a resolution authorizing the donation of funds to the City of Beaumont in the amount of $15,497.51 to be used for educational purposes at the Beaumont Public Libraries. RECOMMENDATION The Administration requests approval of a resolution authorizing the donation of funds to the City of Beaumont in the amount of$15,497.51 to be used for educational purposes at the Beaumont Public Libraries. BACKGROUND The Beaumont Housing Finance Corporation defeased its Single Family Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds,Series 1991 and received net proceeds in the amount of$218,393.66 in October 2001. Section 394.033 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes the Corporation to make donations for the public welfare or for charitable, scientific or educational purposes. The board elected to donate those proceeds to the Art Museum of Southeast Texas, Southeast Texas Arts Council,Beaumont Library Literacy Program and Tyrrell Historical Library. Additional proceeds of$15,497.51 have been received in connection with recent defeasance of bonds. BUDGETARYIMPACT Donation will be deposited to the City of Beaumont General Fund to be used for the Beaumont Public Libraries. PREVIOUS ACTION Board approved a resolution in October 2001 authorizing the donation of proceeds in the amount of$218,393.66. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Finance Officer. RECOMMENDED MOTION Approve/Deny a resolution authorizing the donation of funds to the City of Beaumont in the amount of$15,497.51 to be used for educational purposes at the Beaumont Public Libraries. `mPJ PMorga n JPMorgan Chase Mauri J.Cowen 600 Travis,Suite 1150 Vice-President and Trust Officer Houston,Texas 77002 Tel 713-216-6686 Fax 713-577-5200 mauri.cowena.chase.com December 19,2002 Dear Ms.Kandy Daniel, Enclosed is check#512667 in the amount of$15,497.51,which represents a loan payoff from 11/06/01. Since the bond issue has been called in full,we no longer need to deposit this check. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you, "sAV,inw Amy SWrmer (713)216-0377 ORGAIN , BELL & TUCKER, L. L. P. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 470 ORLEANS STREET LANCE FOX P. O. BOX 1751 OTHER OFFICES PARTNER HOUSTON EXTENSION 1376 BEAU MONT, TEXAS 77704- 1751 AUSTIN EMAIL LCF @OBT.COM TELEPHONE (409) 838-64 1 2 SILSBEE FAX (409) 838-6959 www.obt.com January 2, 2003 VIA HAND DELIVERY Kandy Daniel Beaumont City Hall 801 Main Street Beaumont, Texas 77701 Max Duplant Beaumont City Hall 801 Main Street Beaumont, Texas 77701 RE: Donation of Proceeds from the Defeasance of the Beaumont Housing Finance Corporation Bonds Dear Kandy and Max, Enclosed is the Resolution to authorize the donation of the above referenced proceeds. Also enclosed is a NOTICE OF MEETING of the Board of Directors of the Beaumont Housing Finance Corporation, which Notice must be posted for the passage of the enclosed Resolution. I have stated in the enclosed NOTICE that the meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, January 7, following the City Council meeting. Please let me know if this is not a good date and time for the meeting. Please note that you should make arrangements to have the Notice posted by this Friday. Please call me if you have any questions about this matter. Yours truly, Or n ell &Tuc , L.L.P. Or Lance Fox RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DONATION OF FUNDS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON CITY OF BEAUMONT § WHEREAS, the Beaumont Housing Finance Corporation (the "Issuer") has heretofore issued certain bonds pursuant to the Texas Housing Finance Corporation Act, Chapter 394, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the "Act" ) ; WHEREAS, in connection with the recent defeasance of said bonds, the Issuer received from the Trustee of the Bonds the remaining funds held under the Bond Trust Indenture in the amount of $ 15,497.51 (herein referred to as the "Proceeds) ; and WHEREAS, Section 394 . 033 (d) of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes the Corporation to make donations for the public welfare or for charitable, scientific or educational purposes; and WHEREAS, the Issuer desires to use and donate the Proceeds realized for the purposes set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION: 1 . Consideration. It is hereby found and determined that the transactions contemplated by this Resolution will benefit the Issuer and will be in the best interest of the public welfare and in accordance with the purposes and intent of Section 394 . 033 of the Act . 2 . Donation of Proceeds . Pursuant to Section 394 . 033 of the Act, the Board of Directors of the Issuer hereby authorizes and directs the Issuer to donate the Proceeds for charitable, scientific or educational purposes, and specifically, the Issuer is authorized to donate the Proceeds to the charitable organizations listed in EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference . 3 . Further Action. The President and any other officer of the Issuer is hereby authorized and directed to take all action as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate this Resolution and the donation of the Proceeds to the charitable organizations in accordance with the terms of this Resolution. 4 . Investment of Proceeds . Until such time as the Proceeds have been donated to the charitable organizations as authorized above, the Board of Directors hereby authorizes and ratifies the investment of the Proceeds into the City of Beaumont general operating account, which Proceeds shall be held and shown on the books and records of the City on behalf of the Issuer. 5 . Open Meeting. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code Annotated, Vernon' s 1994, as amended. 6 . Severability. If any Section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Resolution shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such Section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Resolution. 7 . Repealer. All orders, resolutions, and ordinances, and parts thereof inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED AND APPROVED this of January, 2003 . Evelyn Lord, President BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION ATTEST: Lulu Smith, Secretary BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION -2- EXHIBIT "A" The Proceeds will be donated to the following charitable organizations and/or used for the following scientific, educational or charitable purposes : Beaumont Library NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION Notice is hereby given to all interested members of the public that the Board of Directors of the BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, will hold a meeting as follows: DATE: January 7, 2003 TIME: 1:30 p.m. Place: Beaumont City Hall City Council Chambers, I st Floor 801 Main Street Beaumont, Texas Subject: The agenda for such meeting shall include the consideration of and,if deemed advisable by the Board of Directors, the taking of action upon a written RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DONATION OF FUNDS Open to Public: The meeting will be open to the public at all times during which such subject is discussed, considered and formally acted upon as required by the Open Meetings Law(compiled as Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code Annotated, Vernon's 1994, as amended). This Notice of Meeting is intended to be a supplemental notice for the purpose of adding an additional subject to the agenda for such meeting which has been called,and for which notice thereof has been separately posted in accordance with the Open Meetings Law. If,however,notice has not been previously posted in accordance with the Open Meetings Law,this notice shall constitute,in and of itself, a complete notice of such meeting for the purpose of discussing, considering, and acting upon the subject matter stated above. BEAUMONT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION By: Name: Title: OQ1WJ I City of Beaumont REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 7,2003 1:30 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA * Approval of minutes * Confirmation of committee appointment Dohn LaBiche would be appointed to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. The term would commence January 7,2003 and expire January 6, 2005. (Mayor Evelyn M. Lord) Justin Howard would be appointed to the Board of Adjustment(Zoning)as an alternate. The term would commence January 7,2003 and expire January 6,2005. (Mayor Evelyn M. Lord) Pat Avery would be appointed to the Board of Adjustment(Zoning). The term would commence January 7,2003 and expire January 6,2005. (Mayor Evelyn M. Lord) FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. Gulf Coast Electric High Service Pump Station Electrical Improvements 2005 Pecos Street Brystar Contracting,Inc. Boyer,Inc. City of Beaumont 8385 Chemical Road 9318 Reid Lake Beaumont,Tx.77701 Beaumont,Tx.77705 19-Dec-02 Houston,Tx.77064 Description 409-842-6768 Description Quanti Unit Price Total 713-466-5395 1 Furnishing,construction and installation of all Quantity Unit Price Total Quantity Unit Price Total electrical modifications and all improvements as shown or specified in the contract does.And all support work for a complete and operating system 1 LS $ . 95,000.00 $ 95,000.00 1 LS $ 102,800.00 $102,800 1 LS $ 155,806.00 $ 155 806.00 2 Trench Safety System NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $ 1.00 NO BID 1 LF $ 1.00 $ 1,00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID $ 95,000.00 $ 102,800.00 $ 155,807.00 oe 1 p��sf��,/p o a 4