Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET AUG 30 2005 I . I City of Beaumont REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 30,2005 1:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER * Invocation Pledge Roll Call * Presentations and Recognition * Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items 1-6/Consent Agenda * Consent Agenda GENERAL BUSINESS i1. Consider adoption of an Interim Order Ordinance seeking to have CenterPoint Energy comply with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate notice of its proposed increase and to base its request upon the proper test year as defined by the Gas Utility Regulatory Act 2. Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Water Treatment Plant 14 Million Gallons Per Day(MGD) Expansion and Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount for"extra work" 3. Consider approving a one year agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas for employee medical and dental insurance 4. Consider approving a two-year contract with Aetna, Inc. for Basic Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D), Supplemental Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance 5. Consider granting the City Manager authority to implement the contribution rate changes for retirees in the medical plans 6. Schedule a second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget and schedule the date of the meeting at which the City Council will vote on the 2005 (FY 2006) • Proposed Tax Rate WORK SESSION * Review and discuss the proposed FY 2006 Budget and the proposed 2006 Capital Program GENERAL BUSINESS 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Receive comments on proposed FY 2006 Budget, proposed 2006 Capital Program and 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Dilapidated Structures Consider approval of an ordinance declaring certain structures to be dangerous structures and ordering their removal within so many days COMMENTS Councilmembers/City Manager comment on various matters Public Comment (Persons are limited to 3 minutes) EXECUTIVE SESSION * Consider matters related to contemplated or pending litigation in accordance with Section 551.071 of the Government Code: 40 Brandon Steward v. City of Beaumont Curtis Breaux et al v. City of Beaumont et al Shane Landry v. City of Beaumont Michael Charles, et al v. City of Beaumont Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 880-3725 a day prior to the meeting. r 0 L I City of Beaumont REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 30, 2005 1:30 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA * Approval of minutes * Confirmation of committee appointments A) Approve a bid for the purchase and installation of a fire alarm system for the Police Department B) Approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Master Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) C) Approve a one (1) year contract for wastewater laboratory services D) Approve a five (5) year renewal of a lease agreement with the Texas Military Facilities Commission E) Approve a three (3) renewal of an office space lease agreement for the Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force F) Approve a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a ten foot (10') wide water line easement providing access for fire prevention services A A.. City of Beaumont Council A enda Item 'M c g TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval to award a bid for the purchase and installation of a fire alarm system for the Police Department. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends award of a bid for the purchase and installation of a fire alarm system in the amount of$57,310 to Simplex Grinnell L.P. of Beaumont. BACKGROUND The Police Department building is currently protected by a series of smoke detectors primarily located in the elevator shafts and at air-handling ducts. The fire alarm system specified in this bid will allow for complete fire and smoke detection coverage throughout the entire building, and will meet National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for detection devices. The system will consist of a central processing unit, remote smoke and thermal heat detectors, and associate electrical panels and wiring. The unit will communicate with the alarm monitoring company currently under contract with the City via dedicated phone line. The system will utilize a battery backup in the event of a power disruption. The system carries a warranty of two (2) years on parts and one (1) year on labor. Bid notices were provided to thirteen (13) vendors, with two (2) responding with bids. The bids received are as follow: Vendor Model Bid Completion Time Total Amount Bid Simplex Grinnell L.P. Simplex Model 4100U 90 calendar days $57,310.00 Beaumont,TX ' Advanced Systems Notifier NFS-3030 90 calendar days $124,871.25 Beaumont,TX Purchase and Installation of Fire Alarm System-Police Department August 23, 2005 Page 2 Due to the variance in the bid amounts received, Building Services personnel has reviewed the proposed system for compliance with specifications and NFPA requirements, and has determined that it meets all aspects of the code. Conversations by Purchasing staff with the low bidder has shown them to be confident in the bid amount submitted, and it is consistent with the original budget estimate for the project. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds are available for this expenditure in the Capital Reserve Fund. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Internal Services Director and Police Chief. B LI ... Cat y of Beaumont Council A enda Item �Z OL g TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 22, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Master Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). RECONEUENDATION Administration recommends approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Master Advance Funding Agreement with TxDOT. BACKGROUND The Intermodal Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)and the Transportation Equity Act for the 215` Century (TEA-21) authorized transportation programs to meet the challenges of protecting and enhancing communities and the natural environment and advancing the nations economic growth and competitiveness. These transportation programs provide federal funds for the development and construction of local transportation improvements. The Master Advance Funding Agreement provides the general contract language for any project between the City and TxDOT that involves federal funding. Specific language dealing with each individual project will be included in Local Project Advanced Funding Agreements (LPAFA). The LPAFA will be prepared for the proposed Old Dowlen Road, Dowlen Road Extension, Washington Boulevard and Downtown Streetscape Improvements Projects. BUDGETARY IMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION An Advanced Funding Agreement for the Concord Road Project was approved by City Council on September 30, 2003. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECONEWENDED BY City Manager, Public Works Director and City Engineer MAFTxDOT.wpd August 22,2005 STATE OF TEXAS § SUNTY OF TRAVIS § MASTER AGREEMENT GOVERNING LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENTS THIS MASTER AGREEMENT (MAFA) is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "State", and the City of Beaumont, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized officials, hereinafter called the "Local Government." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the lntermodat Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and the Transportation Equity Act for the 21-t Century(TEA 21)codified under Title 23 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq., authorize transportation programs to meet the challenges of protecting and enhancing communities and the natural environment and advancing the nation's economic growth and Competitiveness; and WHEREAS, ISTEA and TEA-21 establish federally funded programs for transportation improvements to implement its public purposes; and WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134 requires that Metropolitan Planning Organizations and the 46 tes' Transportation Agencies to develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of State; and WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Code, Sections 201.103 and 222.052 establish that the State shall design, construct and operate a system of highways in cooperation with local governments; and WHEREAS, federal and state laws require local governments to meet certain contract standards relating to the management and administration of State and federal funds; and WHEREAS, the governing terms of this Master Agreement will provide for efficient and effective contract administration of the types of Local Project Advance Funding Agreements (LPAFA) listed in Attachment A;and, WHEREAS, the Texas Government Code, Section 441.189 allows any state record to be created or stored electronically in accordance with standards and procedures adopted as administrative rules of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Government has approved entering into this Master Agreement by resolution or ordinance, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Master Agreement as Attachment B. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT eriod of the Agreements his Master Agreement and the Local Project Advance Funding Agreements (LPAFAs) subject to this Master Agreement become effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the Page 1 of 12 respective agreements fully executed. This Master Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated as provided in Article 2. 2. Termination of this Master Agreement This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions:. a. by mutual written consent and agreement of a#parties. b. by any party with 90 days written notice. if this Master Agreement is terminated under this clause, all existing, fully executed LPAFAs made under this Master Agreement shall automatically incorporate all the provisions of the Master Agreement. c. by either party, upon: the failure of the other party to fulfill the obligations as set forth in this Master agreement. 3. Termination of the Local Project Advance Funding Agreement(LPAFA) An LPAFA shall remain in effect until the project is completed and accepted by all parties, unless: a. the agreement is terminated in writing with the mutual consent of the parties, or; b. because of a breach of this Master Agreement or a breach of the Local Project Advance Funding Agreement. Any cost incurred due to a breach of contract shall be paid by the breaching party. c. After the PS&E the local government may elect not to provide the funding and the project does not proceed because of insufficient funds; the local government agrees to reimburse the State for its reasonable actual costs incurred during the project. d. Conditions for termination as specified in the LPAFA are fulfilled. 4. Amendments a. Amendment of this Master Agreement by Notice with Mutual Consent: The State may notify the Local Government of changes in this Master Agreement resulting from changes in federal or state laws or rules or regulations and these changes in the Master Agreement shall be incorporated into this agreement unless the State is notified by the Local Government within 60 days. From time to time, the State may issue numbered restatements of this MAFA to wholly reflect its amendments. b. This Master Agreement may be amended due to changes in the agreement or the responsibilities of the parties. Such amendment must be made through a mutually agreed upon, written amendment that is executed by the parties. C. The notice of amendment and the amendment to this Master Agreement may be in an electronic form to the extent permitted by law and after a prior written consent of the parties to this agreement is made. d. Amendments to the LPAFAs due to changes in the character of the work or terms of the agreement, or responsibilities of the parties relating to a specific project governed under this Master Agreement may be enacted through a mutually agreed upon, written amendment to the LPAFA. 3. Remedies This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any agreement default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party to this agreement and shall be cumulative. 6. Utilities If the required right of way encroaches upon existing utilities and the proposed project requires their adjustment, removal or relocation, the Local Government will be responsible for determining Wthe scope of utility work and notify the appropriate utility company to schedule adjustments, lest specified otherwise in a specific LPAFA under other provisions of this MAFA. The Local Government shall be responsible for the adjustment, removal or relocation of utility facilities in accordance with applicable State laws, regulations, rules, policies and procedures. Page 2 of 12 ,This includes, but is not limited to: 43 TAC §15.55 relating to Construction Cost Participation; 43 TAC §21.21 relating to State Participation: in Relocation, Adjustment, and/or Removal of Utilities; and, 43 TAC§ 21.31 at seq. relating to Utility Accommodation. The Local Government will be responsible for all costs associated with additional adjustment, removal, or relocation during the construction of the project: unless this work is provided by the owners of the utility facilities: a. per agreement; b. per all applicable statutes or rules, or; c. as specified otherwise in a LPAFA. Prior to letting a construction contract for a local project, a utility certification must be made available to the State upon request stating that all utilities needing to be adjusted for completion of the construction activity have been adjusted. 7. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a local transportation project must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which require environmental clearance of federal-aid projects. a. The Local Government is responsible for the identification and assessment of any environmental problems associated with the development of a local project governed by this agreement, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement. b. The Local Government is responsible for the cost of any environmental problem's mitigation and remediation, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement. c. The Local Government is responsible for providing any public meetings or public hearings required for development of the environmental assessment, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement. The Local Government shall provide the State with written certification from appropriate regulatory agency(ies) that identified environmental problems have been remediated, unless provided for otherwise in the specific project agreement. 8. Compliance with Texas Accessibility Standards and ADA All parties to this agreement shall ensure that the plans for and the construction of all projects subject to this Master Agreement are in compliance with the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS) issued by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, under the Architectural Barriers Act, Article 9102, Texas Civil Statutes. The TAS establishes minimum accessibility requirements to be consistent with minimum accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (P.L. 101-336) (ADA). 9. Architectural and Engineering Services Any party to this contract may have responsibility for effecting the performance of architectural and engineering services. Or, the parties may agree to be individually responsible for portions of this work. The LPAFA shall define the party responsible for performance of this work. The engineering plans shall be developed in accordance with the applicable State's Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges, and the special specifications and special provisions related thereto, unless specifically stated otherwise in the LPAFA and approved by the State. In procuring professional services, the parties to this agreement must comply with federal requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 172 if the project is federally funded and with Texas Government Code 2254, Subchapter A, in all cases. Nrofessional services contracts for federally funded projects must conform to federal equirements, specifically including the provision for participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs), ADA, and environmental matters. Page 3 of 12 Construction Responsthilitles a. Unless specifically provided for otherwise in the LPAFA, the State shall advertise for construction bids, issue bid proposals, receives and tabulate the bids and award and administer the contract for construction of the Project. Administration of the contract includes the responsibility for construction engineering and for issuance of any change orders, supplemental agreements, amendments, or additional work orders, which may become necessary subsequent to the award of the construction contract. In order to ensure federal funding ellglbifity, projects must be authorized by the State prior to advertising for construction. b. All .contract fatting and award procedures must be approved by the State prior to letting and award of the construction contract, whether the construction contract is awarded by the State or by the Local Government. c. All contract change order review and approval procedures must be approved by the State prior to start of construction. d. Upon completion of the Project, the party constructing the project will issue and sign a Notification of Completion"acknowledging the Projects.construction completion. e. For federally funded contracts, the patties to this agreement will comply with federal construction requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 635 and with requirements cited in 23 CFR Part 633, and shall include the latest version of Form "FHWA-1273° in the contract bidding documents. If force account work will be performed, a finding of cost effectiveness shall be made in compliance with 23 CFR 635, Part B. 11. Project Maintenance The Local Government shall be responsible for maintenance of locally owned roads after completion of the work and the State shall be responsible for maintenance of state highway &ystam after completion of the work if the work was on the state highway system, unless therwise provided for in the LPAFA or other prior existing maintenance agreement with the Local Government. 12. Local Project Sources and Uses of Funds a. The total estimated cost of the Project will be clearly stated in the local project agreement. The expected cash contributions from the federal, state, Local Governments or other parties will be clearly stated. The State will pay for only those project costs that have been approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. b. A project cost estimate showing the estimated contributions in kind or in cash for each major area of the local project will be provided in the LPAFA. This project cost estimate will show how necessary resources for completing the project will be provided by major cost categories. These Categories include but are not limited to: (1) costs of real property; (2) costs of utility work; (3) costs of environmental assessment and remediation; (4) cost of preliminary engineering and design; (5) cost of construction and construction management; and (6) any other local project costs. c. The State will be responsible for securing the Federal and State share of the funding required for the development and construction of the local project. Federal share of the project will be reimbursed to the local government on a cost basis. d. The Local Government will be responsible for all non-federal or non-State participation costs associated with the Project, including any overruns in excess of the approved local project budget, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA. e. Following execution of the LPAFA, but prior to the performance of any review work by the State, the Local Government will remit a check or warrant made payable to the "Texas Department of Transportation " in the amount specified in the LPAFA. The Local Government will pay at a minimum its funding share for the estimated cost of preliminary engineering for the project, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA. Page 4 of 12 f. Sixty(60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids, the Local Government shall remit its remaining financial share for the State's estimated construction oversight and construction costs,unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA. g. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the Local Government at any time during the Project, the State will notify the Local Government in writing. The Local Government will make payment to the State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's written notification, unless otherwise provided for in the LPAFA. h. Upon completion of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the local project costs. Any funds due to the Local Government, the State, or the Federal government will be promptly paid by the owing party. i. The State will not pay interest on any funds provided by the Local Government. j. If a waiver has been granted, the State will not charge the Local Government for the indirect costs the State incurs on the focal project, unless this agreement is terminated at the request of the Local Government prior to completion of the project. k. If the local project has been approved for a "fixed price" or an "incremental payment' non- standard funding or payment arrangement under 43 TAC §15.52, the LPAFA will clearly state the amount of the fixed price or the incremental payment schedule. I. The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts has determined that certain counties qualify as Economically Disadvantaged Counties in comparison to other counties in the state as below average per capita property value, and below average per capita income, and above average unemployment, for certain years. The LPAFA will reflect adjustments to the standard financing arrangement based on this designation. m. The State will not execute the contract for the construction of a local project until the required funding has been made available by the Local Government in accordance with the LPAFA. Right of Way and Real Property The Local Government is responsible for the provision and acquisition of any needed right of way or real property, unless the State agrees to participate in the provision of right of way under the procedures described herein as parts A and B of this provision. Title to right of way and other related real property must be acceptable to the State before funds may be expended for the improvement of the right of way or real property. If the Local Government is the owner of any part of a project site under an LPAFA, the Local Government shall permit the State or its authorized representative access to occupy the site to perform all activities required to execute the work under the LPAFA. All parties to this agreement will comply with and assume the costs for compliance with all the requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title 42 U.S.C.A. Section 4601 et seq., including those provisions relating to incidental expenses incurred by the property owners in conveying the real property to the Local Government, and benefits applicable to the relocation of any displaced person as defined in 49 CFR Section 24.2(g). Documentation to support such compliance must be maintained and made available to the State and its representatives for review and inspection. If the local government purchases right of way for a local government street, title will be acquired in the name of the local government in accordance with applicable laws unless specifically stated otherwise in the LPAFA and approved by the State. If the State participates in the purchase of right of way for the state, it will be under the processes established in the following paragraphs A or B, and the selected option shall be specified in the LPAFA. Page 5 of 12 A. Purchase By the State for the State The State will assume :responsibility for acquisition of all necessary right of way for the highway project. The Local Government will voluntarily contribute to the State funds equal to ten (10): percent of the cost of the right of way for the proper development and construction of the state highway system and shall transmit to the State a warrant or check payable to the Texas Department of Transportation when notified by the State of the estimated cost of the right of way. If the amount Is found insufficient to pay the Local Governments obligation, then the Local Government, upon request of the State, will supplement this amount in such amount as requested by the State. Upon completion of the highway project and in the event the total amount paid by the Local Government is more than ten (10) percent of the actual cost of the right of way, any excess amount will be returned to the Local Government. Cost of the right of way by the State shall mean the total value of compensation paid to owners, including but not limited to utility owners, for their property interests either through negotiations or eminent domain proceedings. B. Purchase by the Local Government for the State Purchase: Right of way purchases shall be a joint effort of the State and the Local Government. Acquisition of right of way shall be in accordance with the terms of this agreement and in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws governing the acquisition policies for acquiring real property. The State agrees to reimburse the Local Government for its share of the cost of such right of way providing acquisition when it has been authorized to proceed by the State. Location Surveys and Preparation of Right of Way Data: The State, without cost to the Local Government, will do the necessary preliminary engineering and title investigation in order to supply to the Local Government the data and instruments necessary to obtain acceptable title to the desired right of way. Determination of Right of Way Values: The Local Government agrees to make a determination of property values for each right of way parcel by methods acceptable to the Local Government and to submit to the State's District Office a tabulation of the values so determined, signed by the appropriate Local Government representative. Such tabulations shall list the parcel numbers, ownership, acreage and recommended compensation. Compensation shall be shown in the component parts of land acquired, itemization of improvements acquired, damages (if any), and the amounts by which the total compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements. This tabulation shall be accompanied by an explanation to support the determined values, together with a copy of information or reports used in arriving at all determined values. Such work will be performed by the Local Government at its expense without cost participation by the State. The State will review the data submitted and may base its reimbursement on the values which are determined by this review. The State, however, reserves the right to perform at its own expense any additional investigation deemed necessary, including supplemental appraisal work by State employees or by employment of fee appraisers, all as may be necessary for determination of values to constitute the basis for State reimbursement. If at any stage of the project development it is determined by mutual-agreement between the State and Local Government that the requirement for the Local Government to submit to the State property value determinations for any part of the required right of way should be waived, the Local Government will make appropriate written notice to the State of such waiver, such notice to be acknowledged in writing by the State. In instances of such waiver, the State by its due processes and at its own expense will make a determination of values to constitute the basis for State reimbursement. Page 6 of 12 Negotiations: The State will notify the Local Government as soon as possible as to the State's determination of value. Negotiation and settlement with the property owner will be the responsibility of the Local Government without participation by the State; however, the Local Government will notify the State immediately prior to closing the transaction so that a current title investigation may be made to determine if there has been any change in the title. The Local Government will deliver properly executed instruments of conveyance which together with any curative instruments found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investigation will be properly vest title in the State for each right of way parcel involved. The costs incidental to negotiation and the costs of recording the right of way instruments will be the responsibility of the Local Government, The cost of title investigation will be the responsibility of the State. Condemnation: Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the Local Government and will be the Local Government's responsibility at its own expense except as hereinafter indicated. The Local Government will obtain from the State without cost current title information and engineering data at the time condemnation are to be indicated. Except as hereinafter set forth the Local Government will concurrently file condemnation proceedings and a notice of lis pendens for each case in the name of the State, and in each'case so filed the judgment of the court wily decree title to the property condemned to the State. The Local Government may, as set forth herein under "Excess Takings" and where it is determined to be necessary, enter condemnation proceedings in its own name. Property acquired in the Local Government's name for the State must comply with requirements set forth in the engineering data and title investigation previously furnished to the Local Government by the State at such time as the Local Government conveys said property to the State. Court Costs, Costs of Special Commissioners' Hearings and Appraisal ppraisal Expense: Court costs and costs of Special Commissioners' hearings assessed against the State or Local Government in condemnation proceedings conducted on behalf of the State and flees incident thereto will be paid by the Local Government. Such costs and fees, with the exception of recording fees, will be eligible for ninety (9o) percent State reimbursement under the established reimbursement procedure provided such costs and fees are eligible for payment by the State under existing law. Where the Local Government uses the State's appraisers employed on a fee basis in Special Commissioners' hearings or subsequent appeals, the cost of the appraiser for updating the report, for preparing new reports, preparing for court testimony and appearing in court to testify in support of the appraisal will be paid direct by the Local Government, but will be eligible for ninety (9o) percent State reimbursement under established procedure provided prior approval for such appraiser has been obtained from the State. The fee paid the appraiser by the Local Government shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in the appraiser's contract for appraisal services with the State. Excess Takings: in the event the Local Government desires to acquire.land in excess of that requested by the State for right of way purposes, the State's cost participation will be limited to the property needed for its purposes. If the Local Government elects to acquire the entire property, including the excess taking, by a single instrument of conveyance or in one eminent domain proceeding, the property involved will be acquired in the name of the Local Government and that portion requested by the State for right of way will be separately conveyed to the State by the Local Government. When acquired by negotiation, the State's participation will be based on the State's approved value of that part of the Property requested for right of way purposes, provided that such approved value does not exceed actual payment made by the Local Government. When acquired by condemnation, the State's participation will be in the proportionate part of the final judgment amount Page 7 of 12 I computed on the basis of the relationship of the State's approved value to the State's predetermined value for the whole property. Improvements: Property owners will be afforded an opportunity in the negotiations to retain any or all of their improvements in the right of way taking. In anticipation of the owner desiring to retain improvements, the State's approved value will include the amounts by which the upper limit of State participation will be reduced for the retention. It is further agreed that the upper limit for the State`s participation in the Local Government's cost for an improved parcel will be reduced as shown in the State's approved value where the owner retains an improvement which is to be moved by either the Local Government or the owner. In the event improvements, which are, in whole or part, a part of the right of way taking are not retained by the owner;title is to be secured in the name of the State. The State will participate in the acquisition of a structure severed by the right of way line if the part of the house, building or similar structure which lies outside the,right of way cannot be reconstructed adequately or there is nothing but salvage left, provided that the State's value is established on this basis and provided that title to the entire structure is taken in the name of the State. The State shall dispose of all improvements acquired. The net revenue derived by the State from the disposition of any improvements sold through the General Services Commission will be credited to the cost of the right of way procured and shared with the Local Government. Relocation of Utilities on Acquired State Right of Way: If the required right of way encroaches upon an existing utility located on its own right of way and the proposed highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of the utility facility, the State will establish the necessity for the utility work. State participation in the cost of making the necessary change, less any resulting increase in the value to the utility and less any salvage value obtainable, may be obtained by either the "actual cost" or "lump sum" procedures. Reimbursement under "actual cost" will be made subsequent to the Local Government's certification that the work has been completed and will be made in an amount equal to ninety (90) percent of the eligible items of cost as paid to the utility owner. The "lump sum" procedure requires that the State establishes the eligibility of the utility work and enters into a three-party agreement, with the owners of the utility facilities and the Local Government, which sets forth the exact lump sum amount of reimbursement, based on a prior appraisal. The utility will be reimbursed by the Local Government after proper certification by the utility that the work has been done, said reimbursement to be the basis of the prior lump sum agreement. The State will reimburse the Local Government in an amount equal to ninety (90) percent of the firm commitment as paid to the utility owner. The foregoing is subject to the provision that the individual lump sum approved value shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In those cases where a single operation is estimated to exceed $20,000 the transaction will be brought to the attention of the State for determination of proper handling based upon the circumstances involved. Such utility firm commitment will be an appropriate item of right of way. The adjustment, removal or relocation of any utility line on publicly owned right of way by sufferance or permit will not be eligible for State reimbursement, The term "utility" under this agreement shall include publicly, privately and cooperatively owned utilities. Fencing Requirements: The Local Government may either pay the property owner for existing right of way fences based on the value such fences contribute to the part taken and damages for an unfenced condition resulting from the right of way taking, in which case the estimated value of such right of way fences and such damages will be included in the recommended value and the approved value, or the Local Government may do the fencing on the property owner`s remaining property. Page 8 of 12 Where the Local Government performs right of way fencing as a part of the total right of way consideration, neither the value of existing right of way fences nor damages for an unfenced condition will be included in the recommended value or the approved value. State participation in the Local Government's cost of constructing right of way fencing on the property owner's remainder may be based on either the actual cost of the fencing or on a predetermined lump sum amount. The State will be given credit for any salvaged fencing material and will not participate in any overhead costs of the Local Government. If State participation is to be requested on the lump sum basis, the State and the Local Government will reach an agreement prior to the actual accomplishment of the work as to the necessity, eligibility and a firm commitment as to the cost of the entire fencing work to be performed. The foregoing is subject to the provision that the lump sum approved cost shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In the event the cost of the fencing is estimated to exceed $20,000, the transaction will be brought to the attention of the State for determination of proper handling based upon the circumstances involved. Reimbursement. The State will reimburse the Local Government for right of way acquired after the date of this agreement in amount not to exceed ninety(90) percent of the cost of the right of way acgtdred in accordance with the terms and provisions of this agreement. The State's reimbursement will be in the amount of ninety {90} percent of the State's predetermined value of each parcel, or the net cost thereof, whichever is the lesser amount. If condemnation is necessary and title is taken as set forth herein under the section entitled "Condemnation," the participation by the State shall be based on the final judgment, conditioned upon the State having been notified in writing prior to the filing of such suit and upon prompt notice being given as to all action taken therein. The State shall have the right to become a party to the suit at any time for all purposes, including the right of appeal at any stage of the proceedings. All other items of cost shall be borne by the State and the Local Government as provided in other sections of this agreement. if a lump sum fencing or utility adjustment agreement has been executed, the State will reimburse the Local Government in the amount of nine 90 ninety f ) percent of the predetermined lump sum cost of the right of way fencing or utility adjustment. If the Local Government prefers not to execute a lump sum agreement for either fencing or utility adjustments, the State will reimburse on the actual cost of such fencing or adjustments. The Local Government`s. request for reimbursement will be supported by a breakdown of the labor, materials and equipment used. General: it is understood that the terms of this agreement shall apply to new right of way authorized and requested by the State which is needed and not yet dedicated, in use or previously acquired in the name of the State or Local Government for highway, street or road purposes. This agreement shalt also apply,with regard to any existing right of way, to outstanding property interests not previously acquired and to eligible utility adjustments not previously made,as authorized and requested by the State. It is further understood that if unusual circumstances develop in the right of way acquisition which are not clearly covered by the terms of this agreement, such unusual circumstances or problems will be resolved by mutual agreement between the State and the Local Government. Page 9 of 12 Notices All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid or sent by electronic mail, (electronic notice being permitted to the extent permitted by law but only after a separate written consent of the parties), addressed to such party at the following addresses: Local Government: State: City of Beaumont Texas Department of Transportation Attn:City Manager Attn:District Engineer P.O.Box 3827 8354 Eastex Freeway Beaumont,Texas 77704-3827 Beaumont,Texas 77748 All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the mail, unless otherwise provided herein. Either party may change the above address by sending written notice of the change to the other party. Either party may request in writing that such notices shall be delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail and such request shall be honored and carried out by the other party. 15. Legal Construction In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions and this agreement shall be construed as if it did not contain the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision. 0 Responsibilities of the Parties The State and the Local Government agree that neither party is an agent, servant, or employee of the other party and each party agrees it is responsible for its individual acts and deeds as well as the acts and deeds of its contractors, employees, representatives, and agents. 17. Ownership of Documents Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the State shall remain the property of the State. All data prepared under this agreement shall be made available to the State without restriction or limitation on their further use. All documents produced or approved or otherwise created by the Local Government shall be transmitter( to the State in the form of photocopy reproduction on a monthly basis as required by the State. The originals shall remain the property of the Local Government. 18. Compliance with Laws The parties shall comply with all Federal, State, and Local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any,courts or administrative bodies or tribunals in any manner affecting the performance of this agreement. When required, the Local Government shall furnish the State with satisfactory,proof of this compliance. 19. Sole Agreement This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the agreement's subject matter. Page 10 of 12 Cost Principles In order to be reimbursed with federal funds, the parties shall comply with the Cost Principles established in OMB Circular A-87 that specify that all reimbursed costs are allowable, reasonable and allocable to the Project. 21. Procurement and Property Management Standards The parties shall adhere to the procurement standards established in Title 49 CFR §18.36 and with the property management standard established in Title 49 CFR§18.32. 22. Inspection of Books and Records The parties to the agreement shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other documentation relating to costs incurred under this agreement and shall make such materials available to the State, the Local Government, and, if federally funded, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the U.S. Office of the Inspector General, or their duly authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of completion of work defined under this contract or until any impending litigation, or claims are resolved. Additionally, the State, the Local Government, and the FHWA and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to all the governmental records that are directly applicable to this agreement for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. 23. Office of Management and Budget(OMB)Audit Requirements The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in OMB Circular No. A-128 through August 31, 2000 and stipulated in OMB Circular A-133 after August 31, 2000. Civil Rights Compliance The Local Government shall comply with the regulations of the Department of Transportation as they relate to nondiscrimination (49 CFR Chapter 21 and 23 CFR §710.405(B)), and Executive Order 11246 titled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 and supplemented in the Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60). 25. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Requirements The parties shall comply with the Disadvantaged/Minority Business Enterprise Program requirements established in 49 CFR Part 26. 26. Debarment Certifications The parties are prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party that is debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance Programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension." The parties to this contract shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order awarded under this contract to certify its eligibility to receive Federal funds and, when requested by the State, to furnish a of the certification in accordance with Title 49 CFR Part 29(Debarment and Suspension). copy 27. Lobbying Certification In executing this Master Agreement, the signatories certify to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: a. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the parties to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grants the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative Page 11 of 12 agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modificgtion of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. b. if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with federal contracts; grants, loans, or cooperative agreements, the signatory for the Local Government shall complete and submit the federal Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. c. The parties shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. By executing an LPAFA Linder this Master Agreement, the parties reaffirm this lobbying certification with respect to the individual projects and reaffirm this certification of the material representation of facts upon which reliance will be made. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Title 31 U.S.C. §1352. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 28. Signatory Warranty The signatories to this agreement warrant that each has the authority to enter into this agreement on behalf of the party represented. IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in Iicate counterparts. E LOCAL GOVERNMENT By: Name Title: Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission for the Purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission. By: Janice Mullenix Director of Contract Services Section Office of General Counsel Texas Department of Transportation Date: Page 12 of 12 ATTACHMENT A TYPES OF LPAFA FUNDING CATEGORIES UNDER THE MAFA Federal Categories Prefix Federal Categories Prefix Interstate Demnstraiton Projects interstate 1 Hi Prr-tority Corridor on NHS DPR Interstate Maintenance IM Rural Access Projects DPR Interstate 414 Discretionary IDR Innovative Projects DPI Interstate Constr-Discretionary ID Priority Intermodai Projects DPM Congestion Corridor IVH/ITS Bl id es High Priority Projects HP Bridge Repair/Rehab On- tear BR/BH Offter National Highway System NH Surface Transportation Program Forest Highways FH Urban Mobili /Rehab STP-I Areas<200,000 STATE CATEGORIES Enhancement STP-TE Metro Mobili /Rehab STP-MM Preventive Maintenance CPM Urban Mobir 1Rehab Farmta-Market/Farm-to-Market Rehab A/AR Urban&Rural Rehabilitation STP-R District Discretionary CD WMobili Rehab STP-RM State Funded Rehab C ,- Crossin Protective Devices STP-RXP Park Road C -H Crossing Hazard Elimination STP-RXH State Funded Mobility C Railroad gradeSeparations STP-RGS PASS/PASS Metro Match C Safety-Hazard Elimination STP-HES Traffic Signals,Signing&Pavement C Markin s Miscellaneous C Con estlon 6fli ation&Air Quality, CM Railroad Replanking CRX Donor State Banos* State,Funded Landscape C/CL CLM Any Area DB State Urban Street CUM Areas>200,000 DBM Areas<200,000 DBU fathers 1_PAFA exception Minimum Guarantee MG Off-System Bridges Program BROX 'ISTEA Funding Categories-Not Re- establishes!in TEA 21 Page 1 of 1 Attachment A ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE Page 1 of 1 Attachment B c it... Cit of Beaumont y� Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a one(1)year contract for wastewater laboratory services. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends award of a one (1) year contract to Anacon, Inc. of Houston for sampling, testing and analysis of wastewater at the unit costs indicated on the attached tabulation, with an estimated total annual expenditure of$43,743.00. BACKGROUND Bids were requested for an annual contract for wastewater laboratory services to identify pollutant levels at various stages of the wastewater treatment cycle within the Water Reclamation Plant. The number of samples and the variety of pollutants for which the city is required to test has been increased substantially in recent years. The analytical testing is mandated and monitored by both the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Bid notices were provided to eleven (11) vendors with four (4) responding with bids as reflected in the attached bid tabulation. Water personnel have reviewed the low bidder's qualifications, and recommend Anacon, Inc. for the award. Water samples are drawn by City personnel, packed appropriately, and will be delivered to the awarded vendor's lab via commercial shipper (at vendor's expense), or will be picked up by vendor personnel at the wastewater plant. The company is currently making twice weekly sample pickups in Port Arthur, and will incorporate the City wastewater plant into that schedule. City personnel will coordinate sampling and pickups with the awarded vendor to ensure compliance with state regulations regarding time-sensitive analytical testing. Annual Contract for Water Treatment Chemicals August 23, 2005 Page 2 BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds are available for this expenditure in the Water Utilities Department's operating budget. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Internal Services Director and Water Utilities Director. BID TABULATION FOR WASTEWATER LABORATORY SERVICES BID NUMBER: rf0605-37 BID OPENING DATE:JULY 14,2005 Chemtex Anacon, Inc. Severn Trent Ana-Lab Corporation Port Arthur,TX Houston,TX Houston,TX (i<ilgore;TX Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total MAJOR INDUSTRIAL USER MONITORING SURVEY 38 Biochemical Oxygen Demand-Sday $17.10 $649.80 w ;" F$�1500 �'=�' � "^OQ,y $20.00 $760.00 $15.00 $570.00 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.60 $478.80 ,' 'S` 0 " $17.00 $646.00 $21.00 $798.00 38 Total Suspended Solids $8.55 $324.90 y Q" 1' 0'`' $10.00 $380.00 $15.00 $570.00 •,� $42.00 $1,$25.20 $957.60 596.00 $35.00 $1,330.00 38 Oil&Grease 38 Total Cyanide $22.73 $863.74 "` '" $30.00 $1,140.00 $30.00 $1,140.00 38 Total Phenol $23.63 $897.94 fW I„ , ,1 00 ^ „a: O $35.00 $1,330.00 $30.00 $1,140.00 Ttal 38 Nickel,4SeleniumS Silver,Zinc,)nc,)'Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury, $75.60 $2,872.80 n`y SQ ,b' $80,00 $3,040.00 $130.00 $4,940.00 20 Hexavalent Chromium $17.10 $342.00 ,, , , 0 l!> )w $15.00 $300.00 $25.00 $500.00 s SGT-HEM $26.55 $132.75 + '„ t7 $45.00 $225.00 $35.00 $175.00 20 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment 1 $360.00 $7,200.00 $U 00 ,. '' " $575.00 $11,500.00 $1,100.00 $22,000.00 20 Additional Analysis,Attachment 1 $135.00 $2,700.00 4, ,, _ -.`a�004 0`r ' +; $145.00 $2,900.00 $220.00 $4,400.00 Total-Major Industrial User Survey $17,420.33 +..„u, ; . ' a` $23,817.00 $37,563.00 Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total ORGANICS GC or GC/MS scan for all 46 base/neutral,all 31 volatile organic,an 12 11 acid priority pollutant compounds $288.00 $3,456.00 1;t, ,! 270 Ok ., I pp;` $400.00 $4,800.00 $378.00 $4,536.00 GC/MS scan for the following pollutants listed in 40 CFR,PT.122, Appendix D,Table V: Dimethyl Amine,Epichlorohydrin, 7 Formaldehyde,Ethylene Diamine,Triethylamine and Xylene. $180.00 $1,260.00 "" $7000 ,, $160.00 $1,120.00 $278.00 $1,946.00 GC analysis for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TPH)and Total 5 BTEX(Benzene,Toluene,Ethylbenzene,and Xylene) $90.00 $450.00 r0, , $90.00 $450.00 $105.40 $527.00 5 GC/MS scan for X lene,Acetone,and Dioxane $67.501 $337.50 SOQQ ,' ,fi' 4pQQ''i^ $75.001 $375.001 $54.401 $272.00 Total-Organics $5,503.50 ai ;'ti �zs a. a' Q:0 $6,745.001 $7,281.00 Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total MINOR COMMERCLUJINDUSTRIAL USER 40 Biochemical Oxygen Demand-5 day $17.10 $684.00 ,' „ sa1�':UQ= :'$ QOh` 0: $20.00 $800.00 $15.00 $600.00 40 Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.60 $504.00 ' , 15 $17.00 $680.00 $21.00 $840.00 40 Total Suspended Solids $8.55 $342.00 a µ', ", �' 0� w„ ," 0 .D$ $10.00 $400.00 $15.00 $600.00 $22.50 $15 $42.00 $2,100.00 $35.00 50 $1,750.00 Metals 20 Nickel,8eleniumCSidlveir,and Zinc)Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury, $75.60 $1,512.00 %*s„* ,„�$O;OUz ` 11a p00'` $80.00 $1,600.00 $130.00 $2,600.00 2 140 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table rl $288.00 $576.00 1 ;, ',' ,¢,7Q QQ Xq x'00:: $400.001 $800.00 $745.00 $1,490.00 2 140 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $189.00 & " ( 0` Q, ;�: 20 ' + $175.00 $350.00 $225.00 $450.00 2 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $720.00 ` '`' $Q bQ <`i'M ; Q 0,; $575.00 j $1,150.00 $1,100.00 $2,200.00 2 Additional Analysis,per Attachment I $135.00 $270.00 70,. Op ' :" 4 0` $145.001 $290.001 $220.00 $440.00 Total-Minor Commercial/Industrial User $5,922.00 .,r.. 5 ,90 0` $8,170.00 $10,970.00 BID TABULATION FOR WASTEWATER LABORATORY SERVICES BID NUMBER: rf06O5-37 BID OPENING DATE:JULY 14,2005 IChemtex Anacon, Inc. I Severn Trent Ana-Lab Corporation Port Arthur,TX Houston,TX Houston,TX Kilgore,TX Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total MINOR COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL USER 4 Biochemical Oxygen Demand-5 day $17.10 $68.40 x ; .-; 15?00 ,`i,„ Q,; $20.00 $80.00 $15.00 $60.00 4 Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.60 $50.40 �,`,, ` >#15"QUOf'0', $17.00 $68.00 $21.00 $84.00 4 Total Suspended Solids $8.55 $34.20 .t; ti55'0,0 2Q= 0 $10.00 $40.00 $15.00 $60.00 4 Oil&Grease $22.50 $90.00 '.#k1 5 005, (!0% $42.00 $168.00 $35.00 $140.00 2 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $576.00 _s ".$, 7 0 0 00 $400.00 $800.00 $745.00 $1,490.00 4 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table]II $94.50 $378.00 00 0 +tr ,"., ' ' ,:' r $175.00 $700.00 $225.00 $900.00 2 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $720.00 $,¢t)D' ^'QO; $575.00 $1,150.00 $1,100.00 $2,200.00 2 Additional Analysis,per Attachment I $135.00 $270.00 S7s,Q9;' 0 r r'', ',' $145.00 $290.00 $220.00 $440.00 Total-Minor Commercial/Residential User $2,187.00 ,,,, „', ', 'F2 D 0. $3,296.00 $5 374.00 Description Unit I Total Unit Total Unit I Total Unit Total RAW WASTEWATER INFLUENT 6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.001 $1,728.00 i „ 527,0: 0 `< 1r2Q Qp,, $400.00 $2,400.00 $745.00 $4,470.00 6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.501 $567.00 aOQ00, ,t 6. °`0't $175.00 $1,050.00 $225.00 $1,350.00 6 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.001 $2,160.00 .4 00 , 8 :Q, $575.001 $3,450.001 $1,100,001 $6,600.00 6 Additional Analysis,AttachmentI $135.00 $810.00 w{,`"'. 5,7,,0:00 ,,_,„;.:. 4p,Q0'. $145.00 $870.00 $220.00 $1,320.00 Total-RawWastewaterInfluent $5,265.00 .tit;;, w., k' 54 20,;. Q;, $7,770.00 $13,740.00 Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total CONSTRUCTED WETLAND INFLUENT ,. 6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $1,728.00 ��'�� �5270;00 �.� ��6 Ox QF. $400.001 $2,400.00 $745.00 $4,470.00 6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $567.00 +� t1�Q0410 w p, ,; $175.00 $1,050.00 $225.00 $1,350.00 6 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $2,160.00 ` *N ," , , OOµO #,° 2r�8D0 , $575.00 $3,450.00 $1,100.00 $6,600.00 6 Additional Analysis,Attachment I $135.00 $810.00 ,,' ,,.' 7D;'DO r t„! 42U .d- $145.00 $870.00 $220.00 $1,320.00 Total-Constructed Wetland Influent $5,265.00tT A RJ2Q 0;0 $7,770.00 1 $13,740.00 Qty Description Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total CONSTRUCTED WETLAND EFFLUENT 1 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $288.00 s�I:a 270s00 _,,„ �7,0 OQs+ $400.00 $400.00 $745.00 $745.00 4 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $378.00 1"+ ;?^ 1A0 00 ,k "a4Q04 0' $175.00 $700.00 $225.00 $900.00 1 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $360.00 ,� ,, 00� >r $ OQ $575.001 $575.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 4 Additional Analysis,Attachment 1 $135.00 $540.00 ? _, Of �,,,, OQ�� $145,001 $580.00 $220.00 $880.00 2 Gl hosate $180.00 $360.00 „ „r< SSQ:0,0 , a;'S16 '001 $150.001 $300.00 $215.00 $430.00 Total-Constructed Wetland Effluent $1,926.00 ,1`;=""."„ „'r`x :514' OS` D $2,555.001 $4,055.00 BID TABULATION FOR WASTEWATER LABORATORY SERVICES BID NUMBER: rf0605-37 BID OPENING DATE:JULY 14,2005 Chemtex Anacon, Inc. Severn Trent. Ana-Lab Corporation Port Arthur;TX Houston,TX Houston,TX Kilgore,TX Descri tion Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Qty DEWATERED BIOSOLIDS 6 40 CFR Part 122,Appendix D,Table II $288.00 $1,728.00 a27„0,0 ., 11,41462 0 00,: $400.00 $2,400.00 $745.00 $4,470.00 6 40 CFR,Part 122,Appendix D,Table III $94.50 $567.00 „ 1,QU 00; � 600: w $175.00 $1,050.00 $225.00 $1,350.00 6 Molybdenum $16.20 $97.20 i' � '„'", 8 0� ',; 4$-O: $10.00 $60.00 $24.75 $148.50 i Complete TCLP(Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure) $450.00 $450.00 :`, .$' S.O Q4 J"0;0 $675.00 $675.00 $710.00 $710.00 6 Toxic Pollutants 30TAC 307 Attachment I $360.00 $2,160.00 =' h S3 4 0 :"" 2 0,09 $575.00 $3,450.00 $1,100.00 $6,600.00 $7,635.00 $13,278.50 Total-Dewatered Biosolids $5,002.20 TOTAL BID AMOUNT 548 491.03 ��S4374,3 Op,Y $67 758.00 $106,001.50 D City of Beaumont Lu Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 25, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider renewal of a lease agreement for the Texas Military Facilities Commission. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends the five-year renewal of a lease agreement for property the Texas Military Facilities Commission (TMFC) presently occupies at 3040 College Street. BACKGROUND TMFC, formerly known as the Texas National Guard Armory Board, leases a 2.5 acre tract of City property, bounded by College Street on the South, and Central Park on the North. The TMFC uses this location as a training facility for a unit of the Texas National Guard. A lease agreement has existed between the City and TMFC since 1965. The current agreement, dated November 1984, gives TMFC an exclusive right to the property until 2015. Extensions of the agreement must be made in five (5) year increments. The TMFC has exercised that extension option three (3) times since the initial term. The current extension will expire November 15, 2005. TMFC has submitted a request to extend the lease agreement for another five-year term, expiring on November 15, 2010. TMFC informed the City recently that The Texas National Guard is being reorganized and will be affected by the Base Realignment and Closure(BRAC)that is being implemented by the federal government. It is likely that the Beaumont facility will no longer be needed in the 2008-2012 time frame; however, it is too early to know for sure. Should BRAC affect the Beaumont facility, the lease would be terminated prior to the proposed expiration date of November 15, 2010. Texas Military Facilities Commission Lease Agreement Renewal August 25, 2005 Page 2 Attached for your review is a copy of the current lease agreement. BUDGETARY IMPACT The consideration paid by the lessee for the original lease was a nominal $10. All subsequent renewals have been without a fee. A rental fee is not a prerequisite to the granting of an extension. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Internal Services Director. C:\DOamema aM Sebin9a\b11M1\My Documena\WPDGCS\Leaa\T%National Guard M—y\2005 U -T,No G...d\,W,Item-Lase Eat-T%Kvw"Guard-3005.wpd THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF JEFFERSON § THIS LEASE AGREEMENT made this the 15th day of November , A.D. 1984, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT, a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, acting herein by and through its duly authorized City Manager and attesting by its City Secretary (hereinafter referred to as "Lessor") and the TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY BOARD, a body politic and corporate of the State of Texas, acting herein by and through its duly authorized Executive Director (hereinafter referred to as "Lessee"): W I T N E S S E T H Whereas, the parties hereto previously entered into a written indenture or lease agreement for a term which ends on the 15th day of November, 1985; and Whereas, the agreement grants to the Texas National Guard Armory Board as Lessee the option to renew the lease for use of the subject property as a training facility of a unit of the Texas National Guard; and Whereas, the agreement authorizes Lessee to sublease the subject property to the Adjutant General of the State of Texas for use by the Texas National Guard and related military purposes; and Whereas, the subject property has been and continues to be leased to the Adjutant General of the State of Texas; and Whereas, Lessee complied with all obligations, duties and responsibilities imposed on it under the lease agreement; Now, Therefore, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($ 10.00 } cash, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, and the covenants and conditions hereinafter recited, Lessor has leased and demised and by these presents does lease and demise unto Lessee all that certain tract or pracel of land located in the City of Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of that certain 6.1601 acre tract leased by the City of Beaumont, Texas to the United States of America under supplemental agreement No. 1 to Lease No. DA-41-243- Eng-613, same being dated December 11 , 1951; THENCE north 000 02' east along the west line of said above mentioned 6.1601 acre tract 315.75 feet to corner; THENCE south 891 59' west 344.89 feet to corner; THENCE south 001 02' west 315.75 feet to corner; said point being 50 feet north of the present north line of College Street; THENCE north 891 59' east along a line parallel with and 50 feet distant from the present north line of College Street 344.89 feet to the place of BEGINNING. The above described tract contains 2.50 acres, more or less. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises for the period of five (5) years, commencing on the 15th day of November, A.D. 1985, and ending on the 15th day of November, A.D. 1990, and for such further periods as this lease may be extended as hereinafter provided upon the following terms and conditions: I. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the above described property may be sublet by the Lessee to the Adjutant General of the State of Texas according to the laws of this State, but in the event the Adjutant General should for any reason fail to pay the rent prescribed in such lease, or in the event the Legislature should fail to appropriate money for the payment of said rent, then in either of such events, Lessee may sublet the premises to any person whomsoever at the highest. rental obtainable; provided, however, that the City of Beaumont, Texas, shall have the first option to sublease such premises upon the same terms and conditions that the property was subleased prior to the occurrence of the events above mentioned. 2 II. Lessee hereby agrees that at the termination of this lease, either by forfeiture or for any cause whatsoever, any and all improvements, structures and fixtures located on said demised premises shall become the sole property of the Lessor. III. The State of Texas is not and shall not be responsible for any damage or injury to said leased property regardless of how the same may occur during the existence of this lease. . This contract is entered into by and between the Lessor and the Lessee upon the express condition and understanding that neither the National Guard units to occupy said premises, nor their officers, nor any member of the Texas National Guard Armory Board shall in any wise be personally liable hereunder and that Lessor is entitled to payment only out of the State appropriations lawfully applicable to payment of the rental stipulated in this lease. IV. It is expressly agreed and understood that at the expiration of the primary term of this lease, Lessee shall have the exclusive option to lease said premises for additional periods of five (5) years in five (5) year increments extending over the twenty-five (25) year period following the expiration of the primary term of this lease. It is the intention of the parties hereto that, provided Lessee exercises any such option by giving Lessor notice thereof in writing within ninety (90) days of the expiration of the term of .the then current lease, Lessor gives and grants unto Lessee such options to renew this lease at rentals to be agreed upon, at said intervals, and that the City of Beaumont as Lessor retains the right to approve any and all renewal options which may be exercised. / EXECUTED this the IP day of A.D. 1984, the CITY OF BEAUMONT signing by and through its City,Manager, 21 N11/1p,f,4p,gI p , duly authorized to execute the same by resolution passed by the City Council on 3 the same by resolution passed by the City Council on �)eeemd e,e /a 19 a9l/, attesting by its City Secretary, and countersigning by its City Auditor, THorrt�4s f! iLoctJRANC� and the TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY BOARD, signing by and through its Executive Director. CITY OF BEAUMONT ATTEST: By city manager —amity Secretary COUNTERSIGNED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: <�•emaa.p�atlUrhLicC_Qt ` City Attorney City Audi tor -LESSOR- TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY BOARD B y Donald err Executive Director -LESSEE- 4 L THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF JEFFERSON § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for �sj�id County and State, on this day personally appeared k'e/ jlgee 5Eee— , City Manager of the City of Beaumont, known tojme to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of the City of Beaumont for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the day of Dec,mlyb.-e 1984. Notary Ptiblic in and for Jefferson County,, /Texas (Type or Print Nameo My Commission Expires: !9- THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared DONALD J. KERR, Executive Director of the TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY BOARD, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the 15th day.of November 1984. otary Public in and for Travis County, Texas Kathleen B. Howell (Type or Print NameT My Commission Expires: October 31, 1988 5 E Vow City of Beaumont ' Council Agenda Item �1:17711174101NIJMIL TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 25, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider renewal of an office space lease agreement for the Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends the three-year renewal of a lease agreement for office and warehouse space for the Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force (ATTF) at a monthly rental fee of$1,670. BACKGROUND The purpose of the ATTF is to detect stolen vehicles and related items. Officers investigate automobile theft rings and inspect salvage yards, used car lots, and automotive repair shops to check for stolen vehicles, motors and other parts. The Task Force consists of seven employees of the Beaumont Police Department, and one officer each from Pt. Arthur, Jefferson County, and Hardin County. Of the seven Beaumont officers, three are detectives from the Criminal Investigation Division. Those three are now considered part of the Task Force and also benefit from the use of the building. Funding for the program is provided by a grant from the Texas Auto Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA). The lease area is approximately 3,900 square feet located at 2430 West Cardinal Drive, Suite C, and owned by Bar C Ranch Company, Bill Wilson, President. The space has been leased by the ATTF since 1993. The monthly rental has been $1,670 since 2002. The ATTF is very satisfied with the location and wishes to extend the agreement to retain use of the facility. The current lease agreement expires on September 30, 2005. All provisions of the lease remain the same as the prior agreement. ATTF is responsible for the cost of all utilities for i Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force Lease Agreement Renewal August 25, 2005 Page 2 the lease area. Hazard insurance, taxes and dumpster services are provided by the owner. The City may terminate this lease without penalty by giving three (3) months written notice. Attached for your review is a copy of the lease agreement in its substantial form. BUDGETARY IMPACT The total estimated expenditure is $20,040 per year for the three (3) year contract period. Funds are reimbursed to the City through the ATPA Grant. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Internal Services Director, and Police Chief. C:\DOC---Scul"0W1m 11M,D ume111P0 11Leau--Theft Tcek F 111411 C RaMhUUb Thch-Bar C 1ll05 LuuUYCMc Ibm-LCCU EAI.ATTP-MI,111 L LEASE AGREEMENT This is a Lease Agreement made and entered into this day of , 2005 by and between Bar C Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation, herein referred to as "LANDLORD" and City of Beaumont/Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force,herein referred to as "TENANT." ARTICLE I Section 1.01 Lease Premises (a) Landlord hereby leases and demises to the Tenant, and the Tenant hereby takes and leases from the Landlord,subj ect to the terms and conditions hereof,warehouse and office space consisting of approximately Three Thousand Nine Hundred(3,900)square feet located at 2430 West Cardinal Drive, Suite C, as shown on the plat attached as Exhibit "A" (herein referred to as the "Leased Premises" or the "Demised Premises"). (b) During the term of this Lease the Tenant shall have the non-exclusive right to use with others the parking area and access driveways serving the building in which the Leased Premises are situated,subject to the Landlord's right to impose reasonable limitations for the purpose of assuring equitable use by all occupants and their invitees. Section 1.02 Term (a) The primary term of this Lease shall be 36 calendar months, plus the partial month, if any, after the commencement of the Lease term. (b) The Tenant may terminate this Lease at any time by giving at least three (3)months notice in writing to the Landlord and no rental shall accrue after the effective date of termination. (c) This Lease shall be automatically renewed from year to year without further notice unless and until the Tenant shall give notice of termination in accordance with subparagraph (b) above; provided that adequate appropriations are available from year to year for payment of rentals, and provided further that this Lease shall in no event extend beyond September 30, 2008. (d) The term of this Lease and the Tenant's obligation to pay rent hereunder shall commence on October 1, 2005. ARTICLE II Section 2.01 Rent During the term of this Lease, the Tenant agrees to pay to the Landlord annual rent in the amount of Twenty Thousand Forty Dollars($20,040.00)payable in monthly installments of Sixteen Hundred Seventy Dollars ($1,670.00) each. The first installment shall be payable on the commencement date of this Lease and on the first day of each month thereafter. Rental shall be payable at the Landlord's office,2615 Calder,Suite 1050,Beaumont,Texas 77702,or at such other Page 1 of 9 place in Beaumont, Texas, as the Landlord may direct by written notice to the Tenant. Section 2.02 Taxes, Insurance and Maintenance (a) Landlord is responsible for all taxes and similar assessments against the land and the building of which the Leased Premises are a part; and premiums applicable to hazard insurance covering the building of which the Leased Premises are a part of; and charges for dumpster serving the Leased Premises. (b) The interior of the Leased Premises,including but not limited to air conditioning filters,shall be maintained under normal conditions at the sole cost and expense of the Tenant and kept by the Tenant in good working condition throughout the term of the Lease. Landlord shall have the right to enter upon the Leased Premises at reasonable times during business hours for the purpose of inspecting the premises in order to determine that maintenance is being properly performed. (c) The foundation,exterior walls,air conditioning equipment and roof of the building in which the Leased Premises are situated shall be maintained by the Landlord, except for damage thereto resulting from acts or negligence of the Tenant or Tenant's agents or invitees. Section 2.03 Utilities at Tenant's Cost Tenant shall be solely responsible for and promptly pay all charges for heat,water, gas, electricity, telephone service or sewerage service or any other utility used or consumed in the Leased Premises. Section 2.04 Landlord Not Responsible for Utilities In no event shall Landlord be liable for an interruption or failure in the supply of any such utility services to the Leased Premises to the extent said interruption or failure is not directly attributable to the negligence of the Landlord. Section 2.05 Taxes on Personal Property The Tenant shall be responsible for and shall pay before delinquency all taxes assessed during the term of this Lease against any leasehold interest or personal property of any kind, owned by or placed in, upon or about the Leased Premises by the Tenant. ARTICLE III Section 3.01 Use of Premises The Tenant shall use the Leased Premises solely for the purpose of conducting the business of the detection and administration of stolen vehicles and related items and all related uses,but for no other purpose or purposes,without first obtaining the written consent of Landlord. Tenant shall promptly and continuously comply with all laws, orders and regulations of the State, County and City affecting the use, occupation, safety and cleanliness of the premises and the equipment of Tenant. Tenant further agrees that during the entire term of this Lease it will remain open for business in a normal and ordinary fashion, during usual and normal business hours,without interruption, except during such time as an interruption may be caused by virtue of damages to the premises. No capital improvement costs are considered to be a part of this Lease Agreement unless specifically agreed Page 2 of 9 to in writing. Section 3.02 Assigning and Subletting Tenant shall not assign this Lease or sublet the Leased Premises or any part thereof without first obtaining the written consent of Landlord;and,if Landlord's consent is obtained,such consent shall not relieve Tenant of its obligations hereunder. ARTICLE IV Section 4.01 Loss and Damage Landlord shall not be liable for any damage to property of Tenant or others located on the Leased Premises,nor for the loss of or damage to any property of Tenant or of others by theft of others. All property of Tenant kept or stored on the Leased Premises shall be so kept or stored at the risk of the Tenant only. Landlord shall not be liable for any injury to persons resulting from any occurrence in, on, or arising out of the Leased Premises,unless caused by the acts of negligence of Landlord, its agents, employees or subcontractors. Section 4.02 Legal Fees The prevailing party shall also pay all costs, expense and reasonable attorney's fees that may be incurred or paid by Landlord in successfully enforcing the covenants and agreements in this Lease. Section 4.03 Liability Insurance Tenant is self-insured as to all liability and maintains an adequate self-insurance fund to pay such claims. As to liability claims resulting from the negligence of Tenant,Tenant will pay such claims and protect Landlord from such claims. ARTICLE V Section 5.01 Notices of Damages In the event the Leased Premises shall be damaged by fire, explosion, or any other type casualty, Tenant shall immediately give notice thereof to the Landlord. Section 5.02 Damage From Insured Hazard If the damage is the result of a hazard covered by insurance, then the Landlord shall repair any damage restoring the Leased Premises,whereupon the Landlord shall be entitled to retain all hazard insurance. If the damage is caused by a non-insured hazard during the term of this Lease,then the Landlord shall have the election of terminating the Lease, or of repairing the damage, whereupon the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. During such time as the Leased Premises are untenantable by virtue of damage, rent shall be abated. Section 5.03 Total Condemnation If the whole of the Leased Premises shall be acquired or condemned by eminent domain, then the term of this Lease shall cease and terminate as of the date that title shall be divested of the Landlord, and all rentals (including taxes and insurance) shall be paid to that date, and Tenant shall have no Page 3 of 9 claim against the Landlord for the value of any unexpired term of this Lease. Section 5.04 Partial Condemnation If any part of the Leased Premises shall be acquired or condemned by eminent domain for any public or quasi-public use or purpose,and in the event that such partial taking or condemnation shall render the Leased Premises unsuitable for the business of the Tenant,then the term of this Lease shall cease and terminate as of the date of title vesting in such proceeding, and Tenant shall have no claim against Landlord for the value of any unexpired term of this Lease. In the event of a partial taking or condemnation which is not extensive enough to render the premises unsuitable for the business of the Tenant,then Landlord may, at its option,promptly make all necessary repairs and alterations necessary to put that portion of the Leased Premises in a condition comparable to its condition at the time of such condemnation less the portion lost in the taking, and in which event the terms and conditions of this Lease shall continue in full force and effect, except for adjustments to the rental reflecting actual changes in square footage of the premises. Section 5.05 Damages In the event of any condemnation or taking by eminent domain as herein before provided,whether whole or partial, the Tenant hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any part thereof. Although all damages in the event of any condemnation are to belong to the Landlord,whether such damages are awarded as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the Leased Premises, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover from the condemning authority, but not the Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Tenant in Tenant's own right, on account of any and all damage to Tenant's business by reason of the condemnation,and for or on account of,any cost or loss to which Tenant might be put in removing Tenant's merchandise, furniture, fixtures, leasehold improvements and equipment. ARTICLE VI Section 6.01 Quiet Enjoyment Upon payment by the Tenant of the rents herein provided,and upon the observance and performance of all covenants,terms and conditions on Tenant's part to be observed and performed,Tenant shall peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy the Leased Premises for the term hereby demised without hindrance or interruption by Landlord or any other person or persons lawfully or equitably claiming by,through or under the Landlord, subject,nevertheless, to the terms and conditions of this Lease. Section 6.02 Holding Over In the event Tenant remains in possession of the Leased Premises after the expiration of this Lease and without the execution of a new lease,it shall be deemed to be occupying said premises as tenant from month-to-month at a rental equal to the rental herein provided and otherwise subject to all the conditions,provisions and obligations of this Lease insofar as the same are applicable to a month-to- month tenancy, subject to Landlord's right to increase rental as provided under the provisions of Texas law applicable to a month-to-month tenancy. Page 4 of 9 Section 6.03 Alterations, etc., by Tenant Tenant shall not make any structural alterations,additions or improvements to the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord, except the installation of unattached movable trade fixtures which may be made or installed without drilling, cutting or otherwise defacing the Leased Premises. All permanent alterations,additions, improvements and fixtures(other than unattached, movable trade fixtures) which may be made or installed by either party hereto upon the Leased Premises, shall remain upon and be surrendered with the premises and become the property of Landlord at the termination of this Lease. Tenant shall have the right to install,at its own expense, a sign or signs at the Leased Premises,subject to Landlord's approval as to size,design and general decor. Any sign shall be the property of the Tenant and must be removed at the end of the tenancy. Section 6.04 Surrender of Premises At the expiration of the tenancy herein created, Tenant shall surrender the Leased Premises in the same condition as the Leased Premises were in upon delivery of possession and completion of Landlord's construction under this Lease, ordinary wear and tear and damage from the elements excepted. The foregoing sentence shall be inapplicable to a termination occurring by virtue of provisions of sections 6.01 or 5.02 hereof. If requested by Landlord, Tenant shall remove all its trade fixtures,and any non-permanent alterations or improvements before surrendering the Leased Premises, and shall repair any damage to the Leased Premises caused thereby. Tenant's obligation to observe or perform this covenant shall survive the expiration or other termination of the term of this Lease. ARTICLE VII Section 7.01 Offset Statement Within ten days after request therefor by Landlord, or upon any sale, assignment or hypothecation of the Leased Premises by Landlord, if an offset statement shall be required from Tenant, Tenant agrees to deliver in recordable form a certificate to any proposed mortgagee or purchaser, or to Landlord, certifying(if such be the case)that this Lease is in full force and effect and that there are no defenses or offsets thereto, or stating those claimed by Tenant. Section 7.02 Attornment Tenant shall, in the event any proceedings are brought for the foreclosure of, or in the event of exercise of the power of sale under any mortgage made by the Landlord covering the Leased Premises, attorn to the purchaser upon any such foreclosure or sale and recognize such purchaser as the Landlord under this Lease. Section 7.03 Subordination It is agreed that the right and interest of Tenant under this Lease shall be subject and subordinate to any mortgages or deeds of trust that may hereafter be placed upon the Leased Premises, and to any and all advances to be made thereunder,and to the interest thereon,and all renewals,modifications, replacements and extensions thereof, if the mortgage or trustee named in said mortgages or deeds of trust shall elect by written notice delivered to Tenant to subject and subordinate the right and interest of the Tenant under this Lease to the lien of its mortgage or deed of trust and shall agree to Page 5 of 9 recognize this Lease of Tenant in the event of foreclosure if Tenant is not in default; but any mortgage or trustee may elect to give the rights and interest of the Tenant under this Lease priority over the lien of its mortgage or deed of trust. In the event of either such election, and upon notification by such mortgagee or trustee to Tenant to that effect, the rights and interest of the Tenant under this Lease shall be deemed to be subordinate to, or to have priority over, as the case may be,the lien of said mortgage or deed of trust,whether this Lease is dated prior to or subsequent to the date of said mortgage or deed of trust. Tenant shall execute and deliver whatever instruments may be required for such purposes,and in the event Tenant fails to do so within ten(10) days after demand in writing, Tenant does hereby make, constitute and irrevocably appoint Landlord as its attorney in fact and in its name, place and stead to do so. Section 7.04 Short Form Lease Landlord and Tenant each agree that at the request of either they will,following the commencement of the term of this Lease, execute and deliver a recordable short-form lease containing the basic provisions of this Lease, acknowledging that Tenant has accepted possession and this Lease is operative, and reciting the exact commencement date and termination date of this Lease. ARTICLE VIII Section 8.01 Waste or Nuisance Tenant shall not commit or suffer to be committed any waste upon the Leased Premises or any nuisance or other act or thing which may disturb the quiet enjoyment of any other tenant of Landlord in the proximity of the Leased Premises. Section 8.02 Governmental Regulations Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense,comply with all requirements and regulations of all county, municipal, state, federal and other applicable governmental authorities, now in force or which may hereafter be in force to the extent that the conditions of this Lease are not changed, pertaining to the said premises, and shall faithfully observe in the use of the premises all municipal and county ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which may hereafter be in force. ARTICLE IX Section 9.01 Acts of Default Any of the following shall constitute an event of default by the Tenant: (a) Failure of Tenant to pay all rental and other charges due hereunder within 15 days after same shall become due; or (b) Failure by Tenant to perform any of the other terms,conditions,covenants or obligations of Tenant under this Lease, if such failure shall continue for more than 30 days after written notice thereof shall have been given by the Landlord to the Tenant;provided,however,that if each failure cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, Tenant shall not be in default if Tenant commences to cure such failure within the thirty(30)day period and in good faith continues to cure Page 6 of 9 each failure; or (c) The Tenant becoming bankrupt or insolvent,or filing any debtor proceedings,or seeking any type of debtor relief,or the filing against the Tenant in any court pursuant to any statute either of the United States or of any other state a petition in bankruptcy or insolvency or for an arrangement or for the appointment of a receiver or trustee for all or a portion of Tenant's property, or Tenant making an assignment for the benefit of creditors,or petitioning for or entering into an arrangement with respect to its creditors; or (d) Abandonment of the Leased Premises by the Tenant; or (e) Any act or omission by the Tenant which creates or purports to create a lien upon the Leased Premises. Nothing herein shall preclude Tenant's right to seek an equitable recovery for any default by Landlord of any provisions of this Lease. Section 9.02 Landlord's Remedies (a) Upon a default by Tenant,the Landlord shall have the right to re-enter and take possession of the Leased Premises. Should Landlord elect to re-enter, as herein provided, or should it take possession pursuant to legal proceedings or pursuant to any notice provided for by law,it may either terminate this Lease or it may from time to time without terminating this Lease, make such alterations and repairs as may be necessary in order to re-let the premises, and re-let said premises or any part thereof for such term or terms (which may be for a term extending beyond the term of this Lease) and at such rental or rentals and upon such other terms and conditions as Landlord in its sole discretion may deem advisable; upon each such re-letting the rentals shall be applied, first, to the payment of any indebtedness other than rent due hereunder from Tenant to Landlord; second, to the payment of any costs and expenses of such re-letting,including brokerage fees and attorney's fees and costs of such alterations and repairs;third,to the payment of rent due and unpaid hereunder, and the residue,if any, shall be held by Landlord and applied in payment of future rent as the same may become due and payable hereunder. If such rentals received from such re-letting during any month be less than that to be paid during the month by Tenant hereunder,Tenant shall pay any such deficiency to Landlord. Such deficiency shall be calculated and paid monthly. No such re-entry or taking possession of said premises by Landlord shall be construed as an election on its part to terminate this Lease unless the termination thereof be decreed by a court of competent jurisdiction. (b) Notwithstanding any such re-letting without termination,Landlord may at any time thereafter elect to terminate this Lease for such previous breach,in addition to any other remedies it may have, and it may recover from Tenant all damages it may incur by reason of such breach, including the cost of recovering the Leased Premises, reasonable attorney's fees, and including the worth at the time of such termination of the excess, if any, of the amount of rent and charges equivalent to rent reserved in this Lease for the remainder of the stated term over the then reasonable rental value of the Leased Premises for the remainder of the stated term,all of which amounts shall be immediately due and payable from Tenant to Landlord. Page 7 of 9 Section 9.03 Additional Remedies In case suit shall be brought for recovery of possession of the Leased Premises, for the recovery of rent or any other amount due under the provisions of this Lease, or because of the breach of any other covenant herein contained on the part of Tenant to be kept or performed, and a breach shall be established, Tenant shall pay to Landlord all expenses incurred therefor, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any and all actions as may be brought under this Lease shall be brought in Jefferson County, Texas. ARTICLE X Section 10.01 Waiver One or more waivers of any covenant, term or condition of this Lease by either party shall not be construed as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same covenant,term or condition. The consent or approval by either party to,or any act by the other party requiring such consent or approval,shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary consent to,or approval of,any subsequent similar act. Waiver by Landlord of any covenant, term or condition of leases with other tenants of the Leased Premises, or failure of Landlord to require of any other tenant of the Leased Premises to undertake or perform obligations hereunder or other similar obligations,shall not be deemed a waiver or failure as to any other person or party. Section 10.02 Accord and Satisfaction No payment by Tenant or receipt by Landlord or a lesser amount than the rent herein stipulated shall be deemed to be other than on account of the earliest stipulated rent, nor shall any endorsement or statement on any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment as rent be deemed an accord and satisfaction, and Landlord may accept such check or payment without prejudice to Landlord's right to recover the balance of such rent or pursue any other remedy provided in this Lease. Section 10.03 Notice Any written notice under this Lease shall be by certified or registered prepaid mail or delivered in person and, (a) if intended for the Landlord,addressed or delivered to Landlord at 2615 Calder, Suite 1050, Beaumont, Texas 77702, or at some other address in the U.S.A. as Landlord may designate by written notice; and (b) if intended for the Tenant, addressed or delivered to Tenant at the City of Beaumont, P. O. Box 3827,Beaumont,Texas 77704,or at some other address in the U.S.A. as Tenant may designate by written notice. Section 10.04 Landlord's Successors-in-Interest This provision of this Lease shall inure to the benefit of the Landlord and its assigns and shall be binding upon the Tenant and its assigns; and the provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon the Landlord only with respect to breaches occurring during the period of ownership of the Leased Page 8 of 9 Premises by the Landlord and upon the successors-in-interest of the Landlord only during the period of ownership by such successors-in-interest of the Landlord. ARTICLE XI Section 11.01 Miscellaneous Provisions This Lease shall be of no force and effect until duly executed by authorized representatives of both parties and delivered in fully executed form to each party. Tenant shall store and promptly and property dispose of any waste oil, antifreeze or gasolines in an environmentally safe manner and shall not cause any pollution or nuisance about the premises. ARTICLE XII Notwithstanding anything contained in this Lease to the contrary, in the event no funds or insufficient funds are appropriated and budgeted or are otherwise unavailable by any means whatsoever in any fiscal period for lease payments due under this Lease, Tenant will immediately notify Landlord in writing of such occurrence and this Lease shall terminate on the last day of the fiscal period for which appropriations have been received or made without penalty or expense to Tenant. EXECUTED in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. LANDLORD: TENANT: Bar C Ranch Company City of Beaumont / Southeast Texas Auto Theft Task Force By: BY: W. E. Wilson, Jr., President Kyle Hayes, City Manager Page 9 of 9 VO%w Cit of Beaumont � lei y Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 22, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a resolution authorizing the acceptance of a ten foot (10) wide water line easement providing access for fire prevention services. RECOMMENDATION Kohl's Texas, L. P., a Texas limited partnership, has agreed to convey a ten foot(10')water line easement to the City of Beaumont. This easement will provide mandatory access for fire prevention services for the new Kohl's Department Store located on Muela Creek Drive and described as being 0.5395 acres out of W. B. Dyches Survey, Abstract 17. Administration recommends acceptance of the easement. BACKGROUND The easement is to be used to provide access to the water lines and fire hydrants for the property named above. It would also allow for the construction, alteration, operation and maintenance of the said water lines and appurtenances. BUDGETARY IMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Public Works Director. engfire_kohls-ib.wpd 22 August 2005 EXHIBIT A NOW OR FORMERLY Ems,M,AR PHEL PHELAN i1, ACRES TRUSTEE CT N0. 2 CFg 9847769 OPRJCT I PROPOSED MUEE CREEK DRIVE N 86'58 07 E 10,00' OUT OF A CALLED 34 849 ACRE TRACT PROPOSED MUEl�4 CREEK DRIVE " SET CAPPED SET CAPPED M A PHELAN, II, TRUSTEE (WIDTH VARIES) 1/2";OO ET ROD DESCRIBED AS TRACT N0. 2 1 TRACT N0. 2 CF/ 9847769 OPRJCT N 86.58'07" E 671.55' 7.96' 60.00'Z N N 86'58'07" E 10.00' a w 9 �$ m Og W O c o Ul p NOW OR FORMERLY Ic 8.370 ACRE TRACT N'o rri SURVEYED OCTOBER 26, 2004 :F- rn BY 13ARROW SURVEYING w OUT OF A CALLED 34.849 ACRE TRACT ?P. M.A. PHELAN, 11, TRUSTEE o DESCRIBED AS TRACT NO. 2 V `� •O0 CFf 9847769 OPRJCT ' Z 0.5395 ACRES o 0 0 23501.09 S.F. N °w b O t o O A Z7 • N 86'59'08" E 583.57' ' ' w `Oa S 86'59'08" W 164,69' S 86'59'08" W 398.88' mc� Q a o L N ii 2 W h rn cn rn p cn N p. Q) V V G' S 86'5651" W 5.00' g q•o FND CAPPED oi IRON ROD co w o �� FND 112" V F4 IRON ROD No p O 6.83' FND CAPPED FND CAPPED. S 86'58'07" W 435.90' IRON ROD IRON ROD (S 86'58'.07" W 435.89') S 8658'07" W NOW OR FORMERLY (Basis of Bearings) 10.00' 5.611 ACRE TRACT NOW OR FORMERLY SURVEYED JULY 27, 2004 TEXACO P.A.W. EMPLOYEES BY WORTECH LAND SURVEYORS, INC. FEDERAL CREDIT UNION OUT OF A CALLED 34.849 ACRE TRACT CALLED 2.2354 ACRES M.A. PHELAN, 8, TRUSTEE TRACT TWO DESCRIBED AS TRACT NO. 2 CF/fl 2002014968 REVISED 6/13/05 Cri 9847769 O OPRJCT PRJCT N Survey Prepared Dr.. NOTES: W THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF A PJ,AT SHOWING 5.611 ACRE TRACT SURVEYED BY WORTECH LAND SURVEYORS 1 BARROW SURVEYING TRACT JULY 27, 2004, TR4 OUT OF A CALLED IN C ACRE PROPOSED yy TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT N0. 2 OF RECORD IN CLERK'S P.O. DRAWER 88 JEFFERSON RS 9847769 COUNT, THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WATER LINE EASEMENT NEWTON, TX 75988 JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS, HAVING BEEN CALLED (409) 379-2265 S 86'58'07"W. S OUT OF THE OR aY: O CK BY: SHE r: &� WESLEY DYCHES LEAGUE VER: ACRD 2004 SCALE: SHEET NO: REV, i DATE: 1-21-05 1"=100' 1 of 1 1 �saQLrie�io�a9zai °al e. �,,.< ARSTRAC',T Nn. 17 � 1 August 30, 2005 Consider adoption of an Interim Order Ordinance seeking to have CenterPoint Energy comply with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate notice of its proposed increase and to base its request upon the proper test year as defined by the Gas Utility Regulatory Act City of Beaumont tlE Council A enda Item � c g TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Tyrone Cooper, City Attorney MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 26, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider adoption of an Interim Order Ordinance seeking to have CenterPoint Energy comply with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate notice of its proposed increase and to base its request upon the proper test year as defined by the Gas Utility Regulatory Act. RECOMMENDATION The administration recommends approval of an ordinance issuing an Interim Order seeking to have CenterPoint Energy comply with state law in its rate increase request by providing adequate notice of its proposed increase and to base its request upon the proper test year. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2005 CenterPoint filed a statement of intent requesting that new rates be adopted in its Beaumont/East Texas and South Texas Divisions. The request was based upon a test year ending March 31, 2004. The historic test year relied upon by CenterPoint is stale and out of date. CenterPoint published notice that it had filed the rate request but the notice was defective in all cities with the exception of Longview. This ordinance is an Interim Order seeking to have CenterPoint comply with the requirements of state law. Texas law requires that conspicuous notice be given. No notice of the increase in rates for typical residential and commercial customers was given in our area. No notice was provided of the proposed increase in service charges. This ordinance requires notice of these changes in rates be published. Without such notice cities are without jurisdiction to make final decisions in CenterPoint's rate request. CENTERPOINT ENERGY -2- AGENDA ITEM FOR AUGUST 30, 2005. CenterPoint must base its rate request upon a historic test year, adjusted for known and measurable charges. The last day of the test year must occur on the last day of the quarter of the year for which the most current 12 months of data is readily available. The test year relied upon by CenterPoint in its request ended on March 31, 2004. This test year is stale. The proposed ordinance requires CenterPoint to base its request on 12 months of data ending on March 31, 2005. The ordinance requires CenterPoint to provide written notice to the City Manager by September 7, 2005 when it expects to comply with this ordinance. Adoption of this Interim Order is recommended. BUDGETARYIMPACT Cities are entitled to rate assistance and cost reimbursement of their reasonable rate case expenses for participating in/or conducting a rate-making proceeding. It is expected that the City of Beaumont will be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in this rate matter. PREVIOUS ACTION Resolution No. 05-160 suspending the effective date for the proposed rate increase of CenterPoint Energy for ninety (90) days. SUBSEQUENT ACTION Future consideration of rate increase request. RECOMMENDED BY City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE AN INTERIM ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS TO REQUIRE CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF ITS CHANGES IN RATES FOR A TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER AND ATYPICAL COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER AND THE CHANGES IN SERVICE CHARGES IN A CONSPICUOUS MANNER;TO REQUIRE CENTERPOINT TO REFILE ITS STATEMENT OF INTENT UTILIZING A CURRENT HISTORIC TEST YEAR, ENDING MARCH 31, 2005 AND TO REQUIRE CENTERPOINT TO CONTACT THE CITY MANAGER ON THE DATE WHEN IT INTENDS TO REFILE ITS STATEMENT OF INTENT USING A CURRENT TEST YEAR AND WHEN CENTERPOINT INTENDS TO PUBLISH NOTICE CONSISTENTWITH THIS ORDINANCE; FINDINGAND DETERMINING THATTHE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGSACT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS RELATEDTO CENTERPOINT'S STATEMENT OF INTENT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on June 30, 2005, CenterPoint Energy Entex ("CenterPoint") filed a Statement of Intent on behalf of its Beaumont/East Texas Division to increase rates within the municipal boundaries of the City of Beaumont; and, WHEREAS, CenterPoint has failed to publish notice to indicate what the percentage increase is for a typical residential and a typical commercial customer that is being requested by CenterPoint within the City of Beaumont; and, WHEREAS, CenterPoint has failed to publish notice to indicate what the current service charges are that it is seeking to increase and what the proposed service charges are if its request is granted within the City of Beaumont; and, i WHEREAS, the requirement to provide adequate and timely notice is fundamental to the City being able to take jurisdiction over the request to increase rates by CenterPoint; and, WHEREAS,the CenterPoint ratepayers are entitled to adequate public notice before any increases in rates are put into effect; and, WHEREAS, the historic test year utilized by CenterPoint in its rate filing ended on March 31, 2004; and, WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act requires that CenterPoint's filing be based upon a test year which contains the most recent 12 months, beginning on the first day of a calendar or fiscal year quarter, for which operating data for a gas utility are available; and, WHEREAS, it is typical in filings before municipalities that the end of the test year not occur more than six to seven months prior to the filing of the Statement of Intent relied upon by CenterPoint with the City Secretary, and, WHEREAS,the test year utilized in its rate filing with the cities in the Beaumont/East Texas Division is stale and not in compliance with state law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: SECTION 1. INTERIM ORDER That this ordinance should be regarded as an interim order and shall remain in full force and effect until a final decision is adopted by the City Council of the City of Beaumont, Texas on CenterPoint's request to change rates. SECTION 2. HISTORIC TEST YEAR DATA CenterPoint shall refile its Statement of Intent using a March 31, 2005 ending test year. CenterPoint is also ordered to notify City Manager in writing no later than September 7, 2005, by what date it will be able to refile its Statement of Intent with the new test year. SECTION 3. PUBLIC NOTICE CenterPoint shall publish notice for four consecutive weeks in conspicuous form in the City of Beaumont. CenterPoint shall publish the body of the notice in at least 12 point type. The heading for the Notice shall be in at least 16 point type, entitled "Notice of Gas Rate Increase." The published notice shall contain information about the requested change in rates within the City of Beaumont, as follows: a) The dollar and cents amount and percentage change in base rates (without the cost of gas) for a typical residential customer (6 mcf). b) The dollar and cents about and percentage change in base rates(without the cost of gas) for a typical commercial customer (30 mcf). C) For each service charge that CenterPoint seeks to change provide the current charge and the proposed charge. CenterPoint is ordered to notify the City Manager in writing no later than September 7, 2005 if it intends to comply with the publication of notice requirements set forth in this section. SECTION 4. CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance is cumulative of all other requirements for notice under state law and shall become effective upon passage and publication as required by law. SECTION 5. PASSED AT OPEN MEETING That the meeting at which this Ordinance was passed was conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act (Texas Government Code Chapter 551). SECTION 6. NOTICE TO CENTERPOINT A copy of this Ordinance shall be faxed to Mr. Chuck Harder, Executive Director of Rates and Regulatory, CenterPoint Energy Entex at (713) 207-0046 within twenty-four hours of the adoption of this Ordinance along with a copy by regular mail to Mr. Harder at 1111 Louisiana, Houston, Texas 77005. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of August, 2005. - Mayor Guy N. Goodson - ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney • 2 August 30, 2005 Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Water Treatment Plant 14 Million Gallons Per Day(MGD) Expansion and Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount for"extra work" • • City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Hani J. Tohme, Water Utilities Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 22, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Water Treatment Plant 14 Million Gallons Per Day(MGD) Expansion and Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount for "extra work." RECOMMENDATION (Administration recommends approval of increasing the Water Treatment Plant 14 MGD Expansion and Miscellaneous Improvements Project amount by$90,450.34 to dig and locate the leak on the existing 48 inch water transmission line, install a light pole, install two 48 inch butterfly valves at the high service pump station discharge connection,install water hose stations, pressure and caustic taps at the new filters. The proposed extra work will represent 0.82 percent of the original contract amount. The total of all of the extra work to date, including this proposed recommendation, will represent 15.83 percent of the original contract amount. BACKGROUND �Jbe proposed additions and modifications to the original contract documents and design are due to unforseen conditions prior to commencing construction and a water leak on an existing 48 inch water transmission line. The changes will improve the future operation and increase the efficiency of the Water Treatment Plant, and will help the City meet required State and Federal regulations. BUDGETARY IMPACT LFunds for the project are available in the Capital Improvement Funds.f PREVIOUS ACTION Resolution 03-271 in the amount of$11,029,000 was passed by City Council on December 16, 2003. Resolution 04-143 in the amount of$1,377,912.01 was passed by City Council on June 29, 2004. Resolution 05-003 in the amount of$28,475.60 was passed by City Council on January 4, 2005. Resolution 05-130 in the amount of$249,396.54 was passed by City Council on May 24,2005. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, and Water Utilities Director. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE Change Order No.4 Date:August 22,2005 Project: Water Treatment Plant 14 MGD Expansion Owner. City of Beaumont P.O.Box 3827 Beaumont,Texas 77704 Contractor: Craig,Sheffield and Austin. 2314 McAllister Road Houston,TX 77092 To the Owner: Approval of Change Order No.4 is requested. Reason for Change: To increase the contract amount performed by the Contractor: To dig and locate the leak on the existing 48 inch water transmission line,install alight pole,install two 48 inch butterfly valves at the high service pump station discharge connection,install water hose stations, pressure and caustic taps at the new filters. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $11.029.000. CHANGE ORDER NO.4 Description Net Change 1.Exploratory Dig for 48"Line +$ 2.797.30 2.Install Light Pole +$ 534.60 3.48"Butterfly Valves at HSPS Discharge Connection +$60.069.29 4.Hose Stations at Filters +$20.964.50 5.Filter Wall Pressure Tap +$ 4.485.00 6.Addition of Caustic Taps in the New Filters +$ 1.599.65 Total Change Order No.4 +$90.450.34 TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $12.865.684.83. CONDITION OF CHANGE: "Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the adjustments in contract price and contract time stipulated in this Change Order No.4 represent full compensation for all increases and decreases in cost of and time required to perform the entire work under Contract arising directly or indirectly from this change order and all previous change orders. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between Owner and Contractor that the change order represents an all-inclusive, mutually agreed upon adjustment to the Contract,and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this change order after it is properly executed." Recommended by: Approved by: Accepted by: Hani Tohme,P.E. City of Beaumont Craig,Sheffield,and Austin Water Utilities Director Owner Contractor Date: Date: Date: • 3 August 30, 2005 Consider approving a one year agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas for employee medical and dental insurance City of Beaumont ..! ease, Council Agenda Item � ` g TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Marie Dodson, Human Resources Manager MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a one year agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) for employee medical and dental insurance. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends that council award to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) a one year agreement with an optional annual renewal not to exceed a total of five (5) years. The rates quoted for a twelve month period effective January 1, 2006 is for third party administration of the City's self funded Preferred Provider Organization(PPO)medical plan, self funded dental plan and a fully insured Health Maintenance Organization (HMO Blue Texas). The extension of this agreement will be on a year-to-year basis to a maximum of five (5) years if it is determined to be in the best interest of the City. BACKGROUND Full time city employees are offered medical and dental benefits. The medical and dental benefits consist of a fully insured HMO plan, a self funded PPO plan and a self funded dental plan. There are 544 participants enrolled in the HMO plan, 466 active employees and 78 retirees. There are 819 participants enrolled in the PPO plan, 713 active employees and 106 retirees. In the dental plan, there are 921 active employees. In June 2005, City staff began analyzing the City's health care costs. Staff also began working with the City's health benefit consultant, McGriff, Siebels and Williams of Texas, Inc., to request bid proposals for the City's HMO, PPO, and dental plans for 2006. The City received only one bid which was from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, the incumbent medical carrier. BCBSTX's proposed PPO renewal showed claims projection for 2006 as essentially flat compared to 2005 claims. This projection resulted in a zero increase in the PPO administration and stop loss fees for the 2006 plan year. BCBS increased the HMO premiums by 13%. This increase was a function of increasing claims utilization, rising trend factors and increasing provider reimbursements.'' McGriff recommends that the City remain with BCBS because BCBS offers cost effective plans with an extensive network and deep provider discounts. The projected medical rate increase is within industry trend. Renewal rates for the self funded dental plan did not increase. Staff recommends implementation of the following HMO and PPO rates January 1, 2006: 2005 Monthly HMO Rates 2006 Monthly HMO Rates Employee Only $233.00 $263.76 Employee + 1 Dependent $561.51 $635.63 Employee + Family T 99.14 $904.63 2005 Monthly PPO Stop Loss 2006 Monthly PPO Stop Loss and Administration Rates and Administration Rates Employee Only $57.17 $57.17 Employee + 1 Dependent $77.88 $77.88 Employee + Family $77.88 $77.88 2005 Monthly Dental 2006 Monthly Dental Administration Rates Administration Rates Employee Only $5.66 $5.66 Employee + 1 Dependent $5.66 $5.66 Employee + Family $5.66 $5.66 Budgetary Impact Appropriation of funds is available in the Employee Benefits Fund. Previous Action None. Subsequent Action None. Recommended By City Manager and Human Resources Director. i RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: THAT the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) for a one-year contract with an optional annual renewal not to exceed a total of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2006 to provide third-party administration of the City's self-funded Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) medical plan, self-funded dental plan and a fully-insured Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) with HMO Blue Texas. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of August, 2005. - Mayor Guy N. Goodson - 4 August 30, 2005 Consider approving a two-year contract with Aetna, Inc. for Basic Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D), Supplemental Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance ` O% City of Beaumont ...A..UU9Council A enda Item M c g TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Marie A. Dodson, Human Resources Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approval of a two-year contract with Aetna, Inc. for Basic Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D), Supplemental Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends that Council award a two-year contract effective January 1, 2006 to Aetna,Inc.for Basic Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment(AD&D), Supplemental Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) and Dependent Life Insurance. BACKGROUND In July 2005,City staff began analyzing the City's life insurance cost. Staff also began working with the City's benefit consultant,McGriff Siebels and Williams of Texas,Inc.to solicit proposals on the City's behalf. McGriff received seven proposals and the incumbent's quote for basic life and accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D), supplemental life and AD&D, and dependent life insurance. The results of the top five proposals are attached for your review. Currently the City provides basic life and accidental death and dismemberment(AD&D)insurance for approximately 1204 employees. The City sponsored basic life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance is provided at no cost to the employee. The amount of basic life/AD&D insurance is 100% of the employee's annual base salary rounded to the next highest $1,000 to a maximum benefit of$50,000. Employees may elect to purchase supplemental life and accidental death and dismemberment and dependent life at a group rate. The group rate is usually more cost effective than an individual policy for the employee. i Supplemental life, which includes AD&D and dependent life, is offered to all employees with approximately 945 currently participating. This coverage has been provided through Prudential since January 1,2004,however,it is recommended that the coverage be provided by Aetna,Inc.beginning January 1,2006 due to a 71.43%proposed increase by Prudential. Aetna,Inc.will provide the same level of coverage that is currently in effect) BUDGETARY IMPACT Appropriation of funds is available in the Employee Benefits Fund. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Human Resources Director. S:\AGENDA\AGENDA ITEM MEMOS\LIFE06.wpd PROPOSAL ANALYSIS FOR BASIC LIFE/ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT INCLUDING OPTIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE Vendors Submitting Basic Life (per Accidental Supplemental Supplemental Dependent Estimated Proposals emp/$1,000 Death & Dis. Life(per emp/ AD&D (per Life Annual City coverage/mo) (per emp/ $1,000 emp/$1,000 (per unit/mo) Premium $1,000 coverage/mo) coverage/mo) coverage/mo) Aetna, Inc. .11 .03 .17 .03 1.00 $74,231 Standard .15 .015 .18 .015 1.00 $87,486 Jefferson Pilot .17 .025 .20 .03 1.00 $103,393 Ft. Dearborn .19 .03 .234 .03 .94 $116,648 Cigna .21 .03 .17 .03 1.00 $127,253 5 August 30, 2005 Consider granting the City Manager authority to implement the contribution rate changes for retirees in the medical plans . City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item � c TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Marie A. Dodson, Human Resources Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: City Council consider granting the City Manager authority to implement the contribution rate changes for retirees in the medical plans. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends that Council approve medical contribution rate changes for retirees including their dependents effective January 1, 2006. BACKGROUND Retirees and their dependents are allowed to elect continuation of medical coverage as provided by state statute. The retiree/dependent may continue coverage until the retiree/dependent is covered by Medicare/Medicaid but not beyond age 65. Currently, there are 186 retirees on the City's medical plans. The retiree contribution rate for Police and Fire retirees is based on a provision in the Police and Fire contract agreements which states, "Any employee who retired on or after February 1, 1992 may be subject to an annual increase in contribution. The increase will be effected in accordance with the labor agreement. The single rate will be established at 69%; single rate +1 at 58%; and the family rate at 54% of the COBRA rate on January 1st annually." This same formula is utilized when calculating the contribution rate for civilian retirees. As such, retiree rates effective January 1, 2006 based on each medical plan will be as follows: L i Plan Medical Prescription 2006 2006 2005 and Rate Drug Rate COBRA Retiree Retiree Category 2006 2006 Rate* Rate Rate PPO (EO) $273.85 57.10 $330.95 $228.36 $227.57 (El) 677.80 141.35 819.15 475.11 470.77 (E2) 890.23 185.65 1,075.88 580.98 579.05 HMO (EO) 263.76 62.94 326.70 225.42 199.38 (E1) 635.63 151.70 787.33 456.65 403.32 (E2) 904.63 215.91 1,120.54 605.09 529.85 *Rate does not include BCBS administration fee. BUDGETARY IMPACT Appropriation of funds is available in the Employee Benefits Fund. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Human Resources Director. S:WGENDA\AGENDA ITEM MEMOS\retraate06.wpd 9/19/02 i RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: THAT the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to implement the contribution rate changes as shown below for retirees including their dependents who are on the City's medical and/or dental plans effective January 1, 2006. Plan Medical Prescription 2005 2004 2005 and Rate Drug Rate COBRA Retiree Retiree Category 2005 2005 Rate* Rate Rate PPO (EO) $273.85 $55.96 $329.81 $227.57 $227.57 (E1) $677.80 $133.88 $811.68 $470.77 $470.77 (E2) $890.23 $182.08 $1,072.31 $579.05 $579.05 HMO (EO) $233.00 $55.96 $288.96 $190.28 $199.38 (E1) $561.51 $133.88 $695.39 $384.89 $403.32 (E2) $799.14 $182.08 $981.22 $505.43 $529.85 *Rate does not include BCBS administration fee. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of August, 2005. - Mayor Guy N. Goodson - 6 August 30, 2005 Schedule a second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget and schedule the date of the meeting at which the City Council will vote on the 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate vow f:UU9 City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Max S. Duplant, Finance Officer MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 25, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Schedule a second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget and schedule the date of the meeting at which the City Council will vote on the 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council schedule a second public hearing on September 6, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers related to the proposed FY 2006 Budget. It is recommended that Council schedule the meeting to adopt the tax rate on September 20, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers BACKGROUND A public hearing is scheduled for August 30, 2005 to review the proposed FY 2006 Budget. This hearing meets the requirements of the City Charter but not state law which requires the public hearing to be held after the 15``' day after the date the proposed budget is filed with the City Council. This will be a joint public hearing as the second required public hearing for the 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate was previously scheduled for September 6, 2005. BUDGETARY IMPACT The detail budget information for all funds was distributed to Council at the August 16, 2005 meeting and will be reviewed at a work session on August 30, 2005. PREVIOUS ACTION aDo Council scheduled a public hearing for August 30, 2005 to review the proposed FY D6 Budget. On August 16, 2005, Council took a record vote to place the proposal to adopt the tax rate on the agenda of a future meeting. Council Agenda Item Page 2 August 25, 2005 SUBSEQUENT ACTION A second public hearing on the proposed FY 2006 Budget will be held on the date Council schedules. If the appropriations increase, another public hearing must be held. The target date for adoption of the FY 2006 Budget is September 20, 2005. RECOMMENDED BY: City Manager and Finance Officer ! 7 August 30, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING: Receive comments on proposed FY 2006 Budget, proposed 2006 Capital Program and 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate C V~IE. ...JJ!-- City of Beaumont ow- Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Max S. Duplant, Finance Officer MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 26, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Hold Joint Public Hearing on proposed FY 2006 Budget, proposed 2006 Capital Program, and 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council hold a joint public hearing as scheduled on the proposed FY 2006 Budget, the proposed 2006 Capital Program, and the 2005 (FY 2006) Proposed Tax Rate of$0.659. In accordance with the Property Tax Code, the Council must make the following announcement: The meeting to vote on the tax rate will be held on September 20, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. BACKGROUND The proposed FY 2006 Budget was submitted to Council on August 16, 2005 and the proposed 2006 Capital Program was submitted on May 10, 2005. Chapter 26 of the Property Tax Code requires taxing units to comply with truth-in-taxation laws in adopting their tax rate. A Notice of Public Hearing of Tax Increase was published August 23, 2005 regarding the proposal to increase total tax revenue from properties on the tax roll by 3.97%. This increase is related to the appraised value, as there is a proposed decrease in the tax rate of$0.005. The percent change to the homeowner is dependent on their taxable value. BUDGETARY IMPACT The proposed FY 2006 Budget appropriation for all funds, net of contingency, totals $172,310,399. Council Agenda Item August 25, 2005 Page 2 In the proposed 2006 Capital Program, projects in the construction phase total $76,908,000 and include $18,395,000 in Public Works projects, $7,200,000 in General Improvement projects and $51,313,000 in Water and Sewer projects. Projects in the design phase total $117,404,000 which includes $85,118,000 in Public Works projects, $7,220,000 in General Improvement projects, and $25,066,000 in Water and Sewer projects. The total for planned projects in all three areas is $123,635,000. Applying the proposed tax rate of$0.659, and a 97% collection rate, budgeted revenues of $19,439,000 and $11,969,000 respectively to the General and Debt Service Funds are anticipated. The total rate of$0.659 is apportioned $0.407869 to the General Fund and $0.251131 toward Debt Service. PREVIOUS ACTION As required by Article VI, Sections 2 and 4 of the City Charter, the proposed FY 2006 Budget was submitted to Council on August 16, 2005, and as required by Sections 19 and 20, the 2006 Capital Program was submitted to Council on May 10, 2005. The notice of the public hearing on the Budget and Capital Program was published August 23, 2005. On August 16, 2005, City Council took a record vote to place the proposal to adopt a tax rate of$0.659 on the agenda of a future meeting. The motion passed and two public hearings were scheduled for August 30, 2005 and September 6, 2005. The Notice of Public Hearing on Tax Increase was published August 23, 2005. SUBSEQUENT ACTION The target date for adoption of the proposed FY 2006 Budget, the proposed 2006 Capital Program, and the 2005 (FY2006) Proposed Tax Rate of$0.659 is September 20, 2005. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Finance Officer RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: r THAT a public hearing to consider the FY 2006 proposed budget for the City of Beaumont shall be held September 6, 2005, at 1:30 o'clock p.m. in the City Council Chambers, City of Beaumont, Texas. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council will meet to adopt the tax rate on September 20, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, City of Beaumont. THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR'S TAX RATE; AND THE TAX RATE WILL RAISE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS ON A $100,000 HOME BY APPROXIMATELY R XIMATELY $266. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of August, 2005. - Mayor Guy N. Goodson - 8 August 30, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING: Dilapidated Structures Consider approval of an ordinance declaring certain structures to be dangerous structures and ordering their removal within so many days City of Beaumont edema. •�• Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Tom Warner, Public Works Director MEETING DATE: August 30, 2005 AGENDA MEMO DATE: August 23, 2005 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider after public hearing to declare the following thirty- four (34) structures to be dangerous structures and order the owners to raze said structures within ten (10) days. If the property owner fails to comply within ten(10)days, staff is requesting City Council authorization to demolish these structures without further notification to the property owner or City Council action. 1. 378 Alabama and Garage (1) 14. 985 Fulton Avenue 2. 1096 Alabama (Commercial) 15. 1650 Gill 3. 2485 Avenue H (Garage Apt.) (2) 16. 4225 Goliad (Commercial) 4. 4040 Blanch (1) 17. 1285 Isla (1) 5. 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) 18. 3275 Ledet Road (Garage) 6. 1560 College and Garage (1) 19. 1832 Liberty (Garage Apartment) (1) 7. 5645 Comstock Road (1) 20. 1430 Live Oak and Rear Metal Shed 8. 3090 Concord Road (Commercial) 21. 1750 Live Oak (Commercial) 9. 6715 Concord Road (Commercial) 22. 1045 Long (Garage) 10 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) 23. 1499 Madison (Garage) 11. 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) 24. 2797 Magnolia (Commercial) 12. 620 Edgemore Drive 25. 3360 Magnolia 13. 2370 Forrest (Garage) T26. 3406 Magnolia (Garage Apartment) V) Indicates number of times structure has been enrolled in work program. (Continued) 27. 3414 Magnolia 31. 2380 Pecan 28. 3492 Magnolia 32. 3125 Roberts (Garage) 29. 4565 N. Major Drive (1) 33. 4265 Sullivan 30. 2258 Pecan 34. 3099 Waverly (#) Indicates number of times structure has been enrolled in work program. RECOMMENDATION That City Council condemn these thirty-four(34)structures and order owner to raze within ten(10) days. BACKGROUND It has been determined that these structures meet the definition of a dangerous structure because they have deteriorated such that they are no longer considered suitable for repair. BUDGETARY IMPACT City may incur the cost of demolition. PREVIOUS ACTION These structures have been inspected by the Building Codes Division and found to be dangerous structures as defined by the City of Beaumont's Code of Ordinances, Article III, Dangerous Structures, Section 14-50. SUBSEQUENT ACTION Building Codes Division will demolish or cause to be demolished said structures. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Public Works Director and Building Official. ORDINANCE NO. ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE FINDING CERTAIN STRUCTURES TO BE PUBLIC NUISANCES AND ORDERING THEIR DEMOLITION AND/OR REPAIR; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Beaumont hereby finds and declares the buildings located at: 1. 378 Alabama and Garage 18. 3275 Ledet Road (Garage) 2. 1096 Alabama (Commercial) 19. 1832 Liberty (Garage Apartment) 3. 2485 Avenue H (Garage Apt.) 20. 1430 Live Oak and Rear Metal Shed 4. 4040 Blanch 21. 1750 Live Oak (Commercial) 5. 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) 22. 1045 Long (Garage) 6. 1560 College and Garage 23. 1499 Madison (Garage) 7. 5645 Comstock Road 24. 2797 Magnolia (Commercial) 8. 3090 Concord Road (Commercial) 25. 3360 Magnolia 9. 6715 Concord Road (Commercial) 26. 3406 Magnolia (Garage Apartment) 10 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) 27. 3414 Magnolia 11. 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) 28. 3492 Magnolia 12. 620 Edgemore Drive 29. 4565 N. Major Drive 13. 2370 Forrest (Garage) 30. 2258 Pecan 14. 985 Fulton Avenue 31. 2380 Pecan 15. 1650 Gill 32. 3125 Roberts (Garage) 16. 4225 Goliad (Commercial) 33. 4265 Sullivan 17. 1285 Isla 34. 3099 Waverly to be public nuisances in that said buildings violate Chapter 14, Section 14-50 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Beaumont and are for want of repairs, or by reason of age or dilapidated condition, likely to cause or promote fires that would endanger persons or property. Section 2. In accordance with Article XVII, Section 2, of the Charter of the City of Beaumont, Section 14-52 of the Code of Ordinances of Beaumont, Texas, it is hereby ordered that the owner or owners of the following described buildings demolish and remove said structures within ten (10) days of the effective date of this ordinance. 1. 378 Alabama and Garage 18. 3275 Ledet Road (Garage) 2. 1096 Alabama (Commercial) 19. 1832 Liberty (Garage Apartment) 3. 2485 Avenue H (Garage Apt.) 20. 1430 Live Oak and Rear Metal Shed 4. 4040 Blanch 21. 1750 Live Oak (Commercial) 5. 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) 22. 1045 Long (Garage) 6. 1560 College and Garage 23. 1499 Madison (Garage) 7. 5645 Comstock Road 24. 2797 Magnolia (Commercial) 8. 3090 Concord Road (Commercial) 25. 3360 Magnolia 9. 6715 Concord Road (Commercial) 26. 3406 Magnolia (Garage Apartment) 10 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) 27. 3414 Magnolia 11. 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) 28. 3492 Magnolia 12. 620 Edgemore Drive 29. 4565 N. Major Drive 13. 2370 Forrest (Garage) 30. 2258 Pecan 14. 985 Fulton Avenue 31. 2380 Pecan 15. 1650 Gill 32. 3125 Roberts (Garage) 16. 4225 Goliad (Commercial) 33. 4265 Sullivan 17. 1285 Isla 34. 3099 Waverly Section 3. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the application of same to a particular set of persons or circumstances should for any reason be held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and to such end the various portions and provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 4. That any person who violated any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be punished as provided in Section 1-8 of the Code of Ordinances of Beaumont, Texas. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the 30th day of August, 2005. - Mayor Guy N. Goodson - SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAUMONT 1L. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE August 21, 2000 WARD 4 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 378 Alabama and Garage OWNER Bryon L. & Dwana L. Lewis ADDRESS 4390 Corley CITY/STATE (07)-4411 APPRAISAL VALUE Land Value 3340 Improvement Value 14490 Total Value 17830 A. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO B. Thirty-three(33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO X D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES X NO 04/04/03 thru 08/04/03 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure is being occupied which is against city code for substandard structures The tenant is Steve Andrus who told staff that he is buying the house from Bryon Lewis. The ,structure needs a new roof. There is water damage to the interior. The kitchen ceiling has missing sheetrock and is covered with a tarp The exterior siding (O S B) is water damaged The right exterior side is uncovered O S B Some of the exterior walls just have felt paper covering them The carport and rear garage are collapsing The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. All damaged electrical wirin! and electrical fixtures will need to meet code Also all damaged plumbing and plumbic fixtures will need to meet code No electrical nor plumbing permits have been purchased Staff spoke with the tenant,Mr. Andrus,the day of the inspection and told him that we would be sending him and the owners a notice to appear before City Council Staff left a card with Mr.Andrus and asked him to have Mr. Lewis call Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS sAP-11 J , f s 378 ALABAMA V � t g 7 � G a t ^ - r -71-V * w x� f�. SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEM NIONT 2. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE April 277, 20W; «ARD 4 :ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1096 Alabama avenue (Commercial) ONN N E R Global New Millennium Partners LTD ,ADDRESS 6671 Southwest Fwv Ste 43�; CITY/STATE Houston, Texas 7707=1-2212 APPRAISAL VALt'E Land Value 57611 Impro-ement Value 1696111 'total Value 173711 A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO B. Thirty-tlu-ec (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO ( . Fire damaged.' YES X NO D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program? YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal exterior of this building has been dammed by fire. The metal roof has extensive damage There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There is broken Mass in the windows. 101he exterior doors need to be replaced The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired all dammed electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced No work has been done. The structure is secure at present time Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`10 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS � kI ��Jdr M 1096 ALABAMA A a t < i iw mr A, 1 V �a x +► *r � A � 1 r�. 'r SYa r,-g N ol • a vA w .:s FE lot x � P dpl t' 1 440 • SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ItiSPECTION REPORT B( ILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEA1 N10NT 3' INITIAL INSPECTION DATE September 9 2003 WARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2485 Avenue 11 (Garage Apartment) O« N E R Melvin Minnard, Jr. ET UX _ADDRESS 7000 Ebonv Ct CITY/STATE Plano, Texas 75024-2109 APPRAISAL VALUE Land Value 2-500 InlproNanent Value 10510 (More than one structure) Total Value 13010 1. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO_ x D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? VES x NO 10131103 thru 03/01/04 Est. 0410V05 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles appear a little worn Some fascia was changed but some is ,,till rotten The stairs have new handrails but the steps are deteriorated all damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There are some new windows and there are a couple that still need to be changed The screens are missing The garage doors are missing Some of the deteriorated exterior siding has been changed The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. Ali damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced 9 building permit was bought 10131103. 'Vo electrical nor t)lcuinhingpernrits there purchased Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact tliat these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value stab' is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS - � t v k e. '- yp•ra 1 IF+y e _ icy► F TAY"uV r 1. t- R w ° ° e " 4' IM I t - � e ,_ r ' r t I� 41 . r + ,fir¢ - IOU � a r a f r �t 'T 1 • , r n r 7 u F • po� I - . OWN" \\~ i . . . y • �� >� �.�\.� }�� « :\§� > << . . \ SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAUMONT 4. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE January 28. 2003 NVARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4040 Blanch ONN,NER Evelyn Bri as ADDRESS 790 E. Gill CIT`1'/STATE (03)-3214 XPPRAISAL VALUE Land Faille 1480 Improvement Value 2951) Total t'alue 4430 A. Fifth (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO B. Thil-0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damar,ed? YES NO X D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES X N0 02/11/03 thru 06/11/03 1'. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,628.22 PLUS COST OF JUDGEMENT. MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: There is water damage to the interior of the structure. The rear steps are dammed All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior front 40door will need to be replaced There is extensive termite damage to the structure. There is extensive deterioration to the foundation The sills are sitting on the ground in the front. The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. -1 huilding permit was purchaser! 3/11 103 fir 5500 00 No electrical nor plunthing permits were purchased. Some repairs were started but there is still extensive repairs to be done The structure is open and accessible. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%o of its appraised value staff is recommendinat raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS ' F Grp e .� .JFw t ,po- •,f& � ,�� � I qY� : i F F W � h p T. wow- 1 I"1 F E ji M. �.✓ a #.'' x.'3.3 p. t r: "" i" t Ys y i t � x � i b' a �u F .. I a PAX -HP. • • F #gyp r , i • tea,= a� • , � ,��, ��� � �� :., =y. Ag IY.T � � •� �; k �spa �. ,: 4F Py $ F t s ,� 1. `-. icc, k SUBSTANDARD BUILDI\G INSPLCTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION 5' CITY OF BEAC'INIONT INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Februan, 17, 2005 NVARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt ADDRFSS 375-5 Delaware Apt 4 CITY/STATE (06)-7936 i APPRAISAL FACIE Land Value 10780 Imprmement Value 16530 Total Value 27310 A. FiftN (III) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO t3. Thirtc-three (33) percent deterioration of supporti►►g members:' YES X NO C. Fire dam ul,ed? YES NO \_ D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program'' YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is deteriorated. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof all damaged or• rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are boarded but the window frames are rotted The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. There is termite damage to the structure The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired Some of the interior was viewed through the burglar bars on the front door. The siding is deteriorated and missing allowing outside elements into attic The bottom plates and corner studs are rotten. X11 damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing urd plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property is overgrown Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE AIJACIIED PHOTOS 4 R W • a F 4 r -A t w 1438 COLLEGE �y I x . AU NP .09, a,. w s w 1 ! r . ' d s P� .y i x F 9, G�. • N k " „� I+ �F X .d+ n r r . • P•`Y • l Mi Y � 111 f� 1 P µ� ;'f f - • 5 5 I, '# u t #a �z� a • w.� .^fir. � H ��z� ., 'F t � r " z ' Jei� F�'u+Wk•r�:reY�n.'t?^4w.,..��'-W �F't=' -ate 1 >. f errs � 9 arm -.u.,�.:?r_ r a,+,.,�• - - ,� .r x c a � � !I s,��` as .e•'Mr_Aiin^"v" ^�£a'"h - ti W'48•�'� M k M Y 4 I - ` a or T � StTBSTA\DARD BUILDI\G tNSPL(IT'IO\ REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CIT1 OF BEAL IIONT 6. INFI IAL INSPECTION DATE Januar-v 23, 2003 NNARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1560 College and Garage OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt ADDRESS _ 3755 Delaware AIt 4 CITE'/STATE (06)-7936 APPRAISAL VALUE I-and Value 71)11 ImproNemcnt Value 4420 Total Valuc 11610 A. FiftN (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members." YES X ',O B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' 1'ES X NO ( . Fire (I ama.,cd° YES X NO D. Enrolled in Wort: Repair Program? YES X NO 113/11/03 thru (17/14/03 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure has had fire damage in the attic area. There is smoke damage throughout the structure from the fire The roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. 'The fascia boards are rotted There is water damage to the interior due to the fire. All dammed or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced The windows are covered with bars but are open allowing Nvater inside The side porch canopy is very deteriorated also the back porch is deteriorated. The porches are being used for homeless to hang out The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. There is termite damage to the structure The foundation has rotten sills. Some sa22ing. The interior- flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired The structure was viewed through the vNindows The exterior paint is peeling all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures wvilf need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. There has been no work from the enrolled work program and no permit was ever purchased. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%o of its appraised value, staff'is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE :ATTACHED PHOTOS ' S . �. k 4r�'wA1RM S • a y- _. -„msµ -�•-.. .. _�_ _y_ . �._ w lk 4 X 9�• 1560 COLLEGE • a . „ * e w, K 'W k 2 � iv k .. kl.. ,. ON w s b .+ .x •y+ � � - a �� � ��+ + s s x a .., a • +fib. :'., , • 4 - • k � k 3 tt p y�H r!; m , 1. V* 0 MRt AM 'q, • ;� � �� � ,° a ,�<� ',, ��.� - -d�"fie�3 • tea �i f F' 4 • YP ISO Wo $ M 71, fl 4 F a9 47 I� • a. a a ww It �. m " e , Vw M . f e 0. A� • WIN L4T f a. f w . F1 , x - to r 0 . jr y r i +.za limb lit" 4 Oak t` � v } L � r d t Cc r - .z I ry N ✓y f� Is.. �1 z iy. y i he e 41 I a SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION is (TI-Y OF BEAt MONT 7. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE November 3, 2003 NNARD I ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 5645 Comstock Road 01� Nl:R Robert D. Tanner ET UX XDDRESS 5390 Linda Lit CITY/STATE (08)-2522 XITRAISAL VAIA1: Land \ alue 84111 11111m cement Value ?791) Total V',line 16200 V Fift. (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO 13. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members." YES X NO C. Fire damaged:' YES NO X D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program:' YES X NO 12/04/03 thru 114104/03 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS. This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed The rear section of the roof has extensive deterioration attempts have been made to patch the roof. It appears that the structure is being used for storage The rafters are rotted There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. The back steps are missing The back door is damaged and will need to be ,-eplaced. The foundation has some sagging in the rear. The interior flooring ceilings and walls are dammed and will need to be repaired The ceilings are damaged all dammed electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. NO hermits have heen purchased. The vard is fenced in for horses Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS 9 a Aa a 7 _ p r w. p IA To T 5645 COMSTOCK RD t F7 f 4 ar 4 , r I PV y °- m �M , F 1 �Iltr' x • k g t w w Alk • a +�. ,"gym � Ki.pi�S,k�V c':2k: "� t ■' +.. a ^� - M. SVBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION 0 CITY OF BEACNIONT 8- INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 25, 2005 NNARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3090 Concord (Commercial) ONNNER Joseph L. Ramey ADDRESS 3030 Gulf St. CITY/STATE (03)-4337 APPRAISAL VALC E Land Value 411911 Improwment Yaluc 5910 Total Value 10000 A. Fift} (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting meml)ers? YES X NO t3. I'll ir0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO X 1). Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is rusty and deteriorated Some of the metal is pulling loose. The fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced all damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. There is termite damage to the structure Some of the exterior siding is rotten and is pulling away from the structure. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property has a rental sign posted on the exterior wall. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 501%, of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS �I II 4 = f. at Y Y � 4,S 9 i x se• r wT-�, .. ' I E , I Sam S t r I� q f 4 I . 3090 CONCORD RD (COMMERCIAL) x` e k � .k! � k � 3s" V alga } s b INN f r 4- f a ,x - # gy I ' r u, vat WNW � • � � c��� <.X'4 has 1 Il SUBSTANDARD DARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BI ILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAT .\ION"F 9- INITIAL INSPECTION DATE July 7. 2004 NVARD 1 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 6715 Concord (Commercial) 0\NNI_R lna Farris ADDRESS 5465 Cole Rd. CITY/STATE (08)-4301 APPRAISAL Y_1LLE Land Yaluc 10830 Inprmanent \ aluc -12520 Total Yaluc 33350 �. Fifty (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X N0 13. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES X NO ( . Fire damaged" YES NO x D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program:' Y'ES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this structure has extensive deterioration. There are holes throughout the roof. The roof is collapsing. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. "There is extensive water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior doors will need to be replaced all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and t�lumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. The inspection was viewed through the windows The structure is secure. The property has a "For Sale" sign posted on the front of the building Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS 4w{I{y; a w, •r '�. �''a gip.�;�: $f� • �� y�� .x :p"•'� s ry� 1•M :fi t 4 a�V.� .- , ^pM �' e`•'3fr k f �=Sx v�`6} �� .Mw a .� �x M4k 4 .*� � yr L3 •'T, i �` 1+ r �•w3 1 . r *rF g r t � 6 Vu y y� s � r _ I r ` d if N a r e a 1n rat SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION 10. 0 CFFY OF BEAUN10VF INI'VIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 9, 2003 «ARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECFION 2039 Delaware (Metal Sheds) MN N ER Shirlex J. Shankle c/o J. B. Swearingen ADDRESS _ 1020 Lilac Lane CITY/STATE (06)-5523 \PPRAIS:IL VAI_[ E Land Value 24511 ImproNrment Value 0 I*otal Value 2451) A. FiftN (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X 10 t3. 'FhiI.0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damaged" YES NO X 1). Enrolled in \Mork Repair Program? YES NO E. DELINQUENT TEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,501.45 PLUS COST OF JUDGEMENT. MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: These two metal sheds are collapsing and are not repairable. The tin is loose and unattached. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these relmirs 4p-,N ill exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS l I, 44WA" FT' g 8 s iFy�, Oi ve- im �► i� .J w Xy.zo • 2039 DEALWARE h. A gal 1�V. .h.r'. ,. �J✓fY' a � xh y i dj r SVBSTA D--kRD BUILDING INSPECTIOti REPORT BI ILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAFNIONT 11. INITIAL IN'SPECTION' DATE Ju1v 24. 2003 NVARD 4 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4130 Ector Avenue (Garage) ONN N E R A. F. Davis ADDRESS 4130 Ector CITN'%STATE (OS)-3539 APPRAISM- VALGE Land \ clue 2450 lmproNen►ent Value 100311 Total Value 18180 A. Fift% (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting;members? It ES X NO 13. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of suppo►-ting; members? YES X NO C. Fire danw-ed? YES NO X D. Enrolled in work Repair Pro;;ram? YES NO X E. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE A MOUNT OF S1,327.40. NO LEGAL ACTION. MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This garage has collapsed. There is one partial wall still standing The remaining part of the structure is a danger to anvone in the area The property is very overgrown Based loon the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a race order for this structure SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS i r w � f N� iy�YO •� � �:: V ` ol Aix ` A ry ~ .' * � 0, Tl k: s �F. btu a I � ' SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAT 190NT 12. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE FebruarN 1-5, 2005 NNARD 4 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 620 Edgemore Drive ONVNER David Christopher Cluck ADDRESS _ 1424 N. 22"" St. CITY/STATE Nederland, Tx. 77627-5738 %PI%-ikiSAL VALLE Land Value 2.51111 ImproNement Value 12870 Total Value 1.53711 A. HIIN (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting memhers? YES X NO B. rtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO X 1). Enrolled in �Vork Repair Program? YES N0 X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is rustv and will need to be replaced "there is water damage to the interior due to the leaking roof a neighbor stated that the structure has had 0:►bout two feet of water in the house. He stated that it had flooded numerous times over the vears. The bottom plates and some of the studs in the exterior walls are damaged all damaged or rotten windows and winclow sills will need to be replaced There is broken glass in the windows The interior flooring walls and ceilings ,vvill need to be repaired The walls and ceilings are stripped to the studs The structure is open and accessible and the vard is overgrowvn Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50"% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS • Air 01 Tl IL A �s t P 1 3 #y 91 Rb.r � L gyp? a k— . w r '1 Ei g, a = M 4 li � 7J.Ijn 1 �1 a ^� • r : • y 4{ s. k ffi x, I a d • jo Yl • St'BSTANDARD BUILDING I\SPECTION REPORT [3t 11-DING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAt NIONT 13_ INITIAL INSPECTION DATE June 11. 2003 NN ARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2370 Forrest (Garage) OWNER .Mildred Coleman :ADDRESS 8075 Glen Eagles CITY/STATE (07) APPRAISAL VALI E t_and � xluc 74;() In►promllent Value 106311 Total Valuc 17380 �. Fifty (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES x NO B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO x D. Enrolled in wort: Repair Program." YES NO x F. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S1,332.01. NO LEGAL ACTION. 1IAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: "This garage has nearly collapsed. The structure is leaning extensively to the right and is in a very unsafe condition. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50010 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED 11110TOS i r ° r r w r r • IF s Id Ap 4r 4,r` opt- Ij . a• �$ - 1 4e �. 1yh • 2370 FORREST SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAUNIONT 14. INITIAL. INSPECTION DATE March 23. 2005 NNARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 985 Fulton Avenue ONN NER Willie Andrews ADDRESS 985 Fulton St. CITY/STATE (01)-7314 %PPR.kISAL VA1,UE Land Value 1471) Improvement Value 22320 Total Value 23790 �. Fifty (5111 percent deterioration of non-supportin" members? YES V NO B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting; tnembers? YES x NO C. Fire dama!oed? YES NO I). Enrolled in \1ork Repair Program? YES NO x MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. The front porch canopy has totally collapsed and has fallen against the front of the structure. There is water damage to the interior due to the 0condition of the roof. The exterior doors will need to be replaced. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. There is extensive termite damage to the structure. The foundation has extensive deterioration. The interior flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be repaired. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%) of its limraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS m v ,s mar 2¢ � { w.. JJ ='s w i lz Nil Ad It F °JM' Row- �3 � rf. a ' 9 a ` h° f >? 985 FULTON la' s a eI - „ IRI`II - ~ lom i � ! • {, ik �{ gJ t4� d I 31 1,Id f � Oa ................................................................. IM D a. XOM II • q u. w ol As.2DW LL 3 � • r - FTM s 0 im i"M ll TT 4 a r � 1 �w- Mr""'y T • � 1,1 x I • • SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BI It-DIiNG CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAUNIONT 15. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE November 16, 2004 WARD 3 :ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1650 Gill ONN'NER Zohreli Shahrodi ADDRESS 1225 Wilchester Cir CITY/STA"TE (06)-4325 VIIRAISAL VALUE Land Value 21750 ImproNement Value 21610 (Nlultiple Structures) Total Valuc 46360 A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C'. Fire damaged." YES NO X 1). Enrolled in work Repair Program:' YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. 'The roof is sagging The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. The front and back porches are deteriorated and will need repair. There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of Othe roof. The exterior doors will need to be replaced. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced The windows have broken glass and the window frames are damaged. There is termite damage to the structure. The foundation has extensive deterioration. The interior flooring,walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be repaired The structure is open and accessible and being vandalized. There is human waste throughout the structure Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%0 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS i r i + V, a M�w•v �-� - ate: y 07:.2cy. kd R MW ak is �4 uyyWyy>�i.0 8. ',5�„ras` 4 s-^t,a p t: 1650 GILL • I no W Mrd Eyz,C^ y : P` 3 t 3 a ; Mm Y F . IN --I amiiiim r:. 3 63yn1. �XA"1MkSPr law III r a. .. n �r IV � n"P SL BSTANRAiRD BLILDI\G I\SPLCTION RLPORT [WILDING CODES DIVISION C[TY OF BEAT \10\T 16. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE October 15, 2004 WARD 4 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4225 Goliad (Commercial) MN NER J. S. Douglas MD ADDRESS 2550 Houston St. CITY/STATE (0t)-6721 \PPRAISAL VXLLE Land \ clue 53911 ImproNrmeot Value 23230 I Mal \ Atle 286211 A. Fifth (5I1) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES X NO C. Fire damaged'.' YES X NO D. Enrolled in Wort: Repair Program? YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This commercial structure has had extensive fire damage to the flat roof on this building. The roof is falling in. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and dammed by the fire. There is water damage to the interior due to the fire. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. The ceilings have extensive fire damage. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. This structure is less than a block from a school. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its apiwaised value, staff'is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS • . I i • a �iwb� r a� • 42 25 GOLIAD y E i ' t, s , ir 31 4 d r � � m '•� iii I'll"i "fan rid S It 4. � 9 kE I I • rte• �, ... _ e _ e IAI KIP • d Fa -» AL I a .e s �r �w >a �r 4 1461` i s SUBSTANDARD BUILDI\G INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION t [TY OF BEAL NIONT 17. INI" IA L, INSPECTION DATE March 12, 2003 V'BARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1285 Isla — ONVNE:R Janice Y. VVingate _ — ADDRESS P O Box 4111 CITY/STATE (04)-4111 APPRAISAL VALUE Land Valuc 2330 ImproNement Value 25420 Total Valuc 27750 A. FiflN (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting, members:' YES N NO 11. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supportim, members:' YES x NO C. Fire dammed:' YES N 10 1). Enrolled in wort.Repair Program? YES Y NO 11105103 thru 03/05/044 E. DELINQUENT TA\ES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF 51,105.71, NO LEGAL ACTION. MAJOR CODE VIOI-ATIONS: There is a small amount of fire damage in the rear of this structure. New shingles will be needed There is extensive water damage to the interior of the structure. All dammed or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There is broken glass in the windows. The doors are missing. There is extensive termite damage. The foundation has extensive deterioration. The floor joist are rotten The interior flooring,_ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. The structure is open and accessible and the entire interior has been vandalized and striRped. There are holes throughout the flooring and the walls have been busted out All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing and plumbiny,fixtures will need to be replaced. .4 huddink= permit was bought 11/06/0 3 but no work has been done. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS 6 g � a" r r., -u a �. r� g a� 3,77 T- 77 IT a; y j Sri AML a • 1285 ISLA • 3gj a ip etc �e 'a r �y'9'7il a��r 07.28. ILI " • L. §;tea lu ii w -4 �: „ u. � ' AWL L �; , � n a hq � 4 i IVA ulmi AU AW Sl .., Wr ' r O A - ' CSI r �a lip- w a3� a+: y } • SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAT VONT 18. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE 'March 10. 2003 \NARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3275 Ledet Road (Garage) O\YNER audrev M. & Mavis Charmouche _ADDRESS 3275 Ledet Road CITY/STATE (08)-1216 %PPRAISAL VALUE Land �slue 500 hnproNement Value 19361) (Residence and garage) Total Value 19860 A. Flft} (51)) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO B. ['hirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO ( . Fire damaged:' YES NO X ll. Enrolled in AVork Repair Program? YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This garage has extensive deterioration and is collapsing The metal roof is caving in. The rafters and fascia boards are rotten and will need to be replaced. There are holes lothroughout allowing water damage to the interior of the garage There are no doors on the structure. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%► of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS i e w i 9 w�' r � • ML 40 4 k Y • 3275 LEDET • r s a Alp ems, ,w • E y w * ". ° , z 3.° low • • SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BI_ ILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAtAI0NT 19. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE August 30, 2002 NNARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1832 Liberty (Rear Garage Apartment) OWN E R John Fisher ADDRESS 13695 Rolling Hills Drive CITY/STATE (13)-8411 APPRAISAL �'ALCE Land Valuc 50150 Impro%rment Value 1-5340 (More than one structure) I otal Value 20990 A. Fifts (51I) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO 13. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting; members? YES x N0 ( . Fire damaged? YES \O x D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES x ti0 (16/16/03 thru 10/10/03 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles on this structure appear slightly worn. Some rafters and fascia boards are rotted on the rear side. The exterior stairs to 2"' floor living area are listing and very unstable. Then are made of concrete. The structure appears to being used for storage. The bottom garages are full of building materials. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. There is broken glass in some of the windows and sorne damage to window frames, sills and trim. The doors are deteriorated. The exterior siding is rotted. The supporting,sills are not stable and the structure appears to be sagging or listing a small amount. all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. :also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. A building permit was purclused 116127103 but no work ha.c been clone. The rear yard is very overgrown. This structure was presented before the Historic Landmark Commission on August 8 2005 and was approved for demolition. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 5,V4, of its appraised value. staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS s • 1832 LIBERTY • T 1: '�.��' I .� 9►'"'.n �.:�A � �" �'�h!" ',�!S '':gip'��� . ' r r r s W da :Y i�bC f� r :j � a mt ` Iki 1 Y r s • ft c ' ,r p s I` Nor AQ ek CON 00 TI td mp- e r d • SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITN OF BEA[ NIONT 20. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE May 25, 2005 NVARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1430 Live Oak and Rear .Nietal Shed ONN NER L. G. ,Matthews NDI)RESS 1430 Live Oak St. CITY/STATE (03)-5232 APPRAISAL VALIJ: I'and Value 2450 ImproNemcnt Value 13450 Total Valuc 159110 A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting;members? YES R NO B. Ihirti-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES R NO C. Fire darrui:red? YES NO R 1). Enrolled in work Repair Program? YES NO R E. DELINQUENT TARES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,953.48, NO LEGAL ACTION. MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles on this structure's roof are worn. There is water damage to the interior of the structure. The exterior doors are missing and will need to be replaced. All damaged or rotten windows and Nvindow sills will need to be replaced. The windows are broken out. The foundation has extensive deterioration. The interior flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be repaired. The flooring in the kitchen is rotten. The structure is open and accessible and being vandalized. The yard is trashed and overgrown There is a shed in the rear of the property- that is collapsing. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%0 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS ,F f � � I .. P r • 7 y � I 1 t • 1430 LIVE OAK • s I h a � - Al A's * 11.e • 955 E k U "mss -z i. NFi.. yp t Am �.. Yt� � tr t 7°e -' illie Lb All Y K f IP,.°,°• y`yetis`m'':` ,, -- F�. ��i:"".. Y °a.�'t ,� ....�5 .5.�.. .1.. . i i b • olv . '4. El 1 � h v SHED IN REAR • • St'BSTANDARD WILDING, INSPECTION REPORT [WILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAT MONT 21. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 25, 2005 «ARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1750 Live Oak (Commercial) _ 0\N'NER Juston Joseph & George Bruno _ADDRESS 4050 Cleveland St. CITY/STATE (03)-2952 APPRAISAL VALIT Land V'aloe 16610 Impro�rnlent Value 1000 Join► Value 17610 V Fifth (5II) percent deterioration of non-sup Ito rtin-members? YES A NO B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? 1'E S Y NO ( . Fire dama�,ed? YES 'SO 1 1). Enrolled in Work Repair Proar on? YES NO MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this commercial structure is deteriorated. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is extensive water damage to the interior of the structure due to the condition of the roof The exterior doors are missing and will need to be replaced. All 40damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are broken out and missing. The interior- flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be repaired. The structure is open and accessible and is full of debris Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS Mk + f � Y E ' $ 6I Air ll l t fit 1 a � r � ar, r , r "u rp ..r p t SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING ('ODES DIVISION CIT1 OF BEAUNIO NT 22- IN EIAL INSPECTION DATE February 4, 2003 NN ARD 3 1DDRESS OF INSPECTION 1045 Long (Garage) 0 N N,F R Charles B. Crabbe ADDRESS _ 928 East Drive CITY/STATE (06)-473; APPRAISAL VALCE Land Valuc 14811 ImproNcuient Value 22550 (Residence and garage) Total Value 24030 A. FiRN (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES x NO B. I'll irtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO (`. Fire damaged? YES N0 x I). Enrolled in \N'ork Repair Program:' 1'ES NO x MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this garage has extensive deterioration and new decking will be needed. The rafters and fascia boards are rotten and will need to be replaced. There is water damage to the interior due to the leaking roof. The exterior doors are missing and one side has a tarp covering the 90penim-)r. There is a car inside. The siding has extensive rot and deterioration. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50%o of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this Structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS r° in ' d ' 9f a I � l I d: iW r - T ,e.., >3 I a+•m � � x ' yly atati.Y^ _ ,• k Amin' 1045 LONG r m x �' .k. r a fi r s h. -"• �a�drywr,a�j - _, www H NNM Aar $C cul N-1; St'BSr '.a1D.aRD BUILDING IISPECTION REPORT Bt I1-DING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEALIMOW 23. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE July 17. 2003 \WARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1499 Madison (Garage) OWN N E R Jim E. Roberts _ADDRESS 1499 Madison St. CITY/STATE (0t)-7517 APPRAISAL VAIJ E Land \ 111uc 1971) Imprmement Value 18820 (Residence and garage) Total Value 2117911 A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO E3. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO x I). Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES NO x :MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This garage has nearly collapsed. The structure is leaning extensively to the left and is in a very unsafe condition. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these rej)airs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS ME- ......... fill " SUBSTANDARD BUILDItiG I\SPE("TION REPORT Bt IL.DING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAUNIONT 24. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Nlay 25. 2005 NYARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2797 Magnolia (('ommercial) ONYNER Robert E & Doris A. Campbell TRSTEE ADDRESS 4420 Beale St. CITY/STATE (0S)-4705 APPRAISAL VALC E I-and Value 79211 ImproNement Value 18070 Fotal Value 25990 X. Fifty (,m percent deterioration of non-supporting members`.' YES x NO I3. I-hirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES x NO C. Fire damaged. YES NO x D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program:' YES NO x MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this commercial structure is deteriorated. All damn e; d or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are broken out and missing allowing rain to ruin interior walls and flooring. Some of the windows have plywood covering them and the structure 40 was secure at the time of inspection. The interior flooring, walls and ceilings are damaged and will need to be repaired. The doors are damaged and will need replacing. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS 40 • s 414 �r t • x ¢ ro 07.27. • 2797 MAGNOLIA I V � t g 7 � G a t ^ - r -71-V * w x� f�. SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEM NIONT 2. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE April 277, 20W; «ARD 4 :ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1096 Alabama avenue (Commercial) ONN N E R Global New Millennium Partners LTD ,ADDRESS 6671 Southwest Fwv Ste 43�; CITY/STATE Houston, Texas 7707=1-2212 APPRAISAL VALt'E Land Value 57611 Impro-ement Value 1696111 'total Value 173711 A. Fifth (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO B. Thirty-tlu-ec (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO ( . Fire damaged.' YES X NO D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program? YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal exterior of this building has been dammed by fire. The metal roof has extensive damage There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There is broken Mass in the windows. 101he exterior doors need to be replaced The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired all dammed electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced No work has been done. The structure is secure at present time Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`10 of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS � kI ��Jdr M 1096 ALABAMA A a t < i iw mr A, 1 V �a x +► *r � A � 1 r�. 'r SYa r,-g N ol • a vA w .:s FE lot x � P dpl t' 1 440 • SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ItiSPECTION REPORT B( ILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEA1 N10NT 3' INITIAL INSPECTION DATE September 9 2003 WARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 2485 Avenue 11 (Garage Apartment) O« N E R Melvin Minnard, Jr. ET UX _ADDRESS 7000 Ebonv Ct CITY/STATE Plano, Texas 75024-2109 APPRAISAL VALUE Land Value 2-500 InlproNanent Value 10510 (More than one structure) Total Value 13010 1. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES x NO B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES x NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO_ x D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? VES x NO 10131103 thru 03/01/04 Est. 0410V05 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The shingles appear a little worn Some fascia was changed but some is ,,till rotten The stairs have new handrails but the steps are deteriorated all damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced There are some new windows and there are a couple that still need to be changed The screens are missing The garage doors are missing Some of the deteriorated exterior siding has been changed The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired. Ali damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced 9 building permit was bought 10131103. 'Vo electrical nor t)lcuinhingpernrits there purchased Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact tliat these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value stab' is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS - � t v k e. '- yp•ra 1 IF+y e _ icy► F TAY"uV r 1. t- R w ° ° e " 4' IM I t - � e ,_ r ' r t I� 41 . r + ,fir¢ - IOU � a r a f r �t 'T 1 • , r n r 7 u F • po� I - . OWN" \\~ i . . . y • �� >� �.�\.� }�� « :\§� > << . . \ SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAUMONT 4. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE January 28. 2003 NVARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 4040 Blanch ONN,NER Evelyn Bri as ADDRESS 790 E. Gill CIT`1'/STATE (03)-3214 XPPRAISAL VALUE Land Faille 1480 Improvement Value 2951) Total t'alue 4430 A. Fifth (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X NO B. Thil-0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damar,ed? YES NO X D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES X N0 02/11/03 thru 06/11/03 1'. DELINQUENT TAXES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF S3,628.22 PLUS COST OF JUDGEMENT. MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: There is water damage to the interior of the structure. The rear steps are dammed All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior front 40door will need to be replaced There is extensive termite damage to the structure. There is extensive deterioration to the foundation The sills are sitting on the ground in the front. The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. -1 huilding permit was purchaser! 3/11 103 fir 5500 00 No electrical nor plunthing permits were purchased. Some repairs were started but there is still extensive repairs to be done The structure is open and accessible. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%o of its appraised value staff is recommendinat raze order for this structure. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS ' F Grp e .� .JFw t ,po- •,f& � ,�� � I qY� : i F F W � h p T. wow- 1 I"1 F E ji M. �.✓ a #.'' x.'3.3 p. t r: "" i" t Ys y i t � x � i b' a �u F .. I a PAX -HP. • • F #gyp r , i • tea,= a� • , � ,��, ��� � �� :., =y. Ag IY.T � � •� �; k �spa �. ,: 4F Py $ F t s ,� 1. `-. icc, k SUBSTANDARD BUILDI\G INSPLCTION REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION 5' CITY OF BEAC'INIONT INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Februan, 17, 2005 NVARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1438-44-46 College (Commercial) OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt ADDRFSS 375-5 Delaware Apt 4 CITY/STATE (06)-7936 i APPRAISAL FACIE Land Value 10780 Imprmement Value 16530 Total Value 27310 A. FiftN (III) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO t3. Thirtc-three (33) percent deterioration of supporti►►g members:' YES X NO C. Fire dam ul,ed? YES NO \_ D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program'' YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is deteriorated. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof all damaged or• rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The windows are boarded but the window frames are rotted The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. There is termite damage to the structure The interior flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired Some of the interior was viewed through the burglar bars on the front door. The siding is deteriorated and missing allowing outside elements into attic The bottom plates and corner studs are rotten. X11 damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced Also all damaged plumbing urd plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property is overgrown Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over -50% of its appraised value, staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE AIJACIIED PHOTOS 4 R W • a F 4 r -A t w 1438 COLLEGE �y I x . AU NP .09, a,. w s w 1 ! r . ' d s P� .y i x F 9, G�. • N k " „� I+ �F X .d+ n r r . • P•`Y • l Mi Y � 111 f� 1 P µ� ;'f f - • 5 5 I, '# u t #a �z� a • w.� .^fir. � H ��z� ., 'F t � r " z ' Jei� F�'u+Wk•r�:reY�n.'t?^4w.,..��'-W �F't=' -ate 1 >. f errs � 9 arm -.u.,�.:?r_ r a,+,.,�• - - ,� .r x c a � � !I s,��` as .e•'Mr_Aiin^"v" ^�£a'"h - ti W'48•�'� M k M Y 4 I - ` a or T � StTBSTA\DARD BUILDI\G tNSPL(IT'IO\ REPORT BUILDING CODES DIVISION CIT1 OF BEAL IIONT 6. INFI IAL INSPECTION DATE Januar-v 23, 2003 NNARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1560 College and Garage OWNER Rubv Newsome ESTATE c/o Debbie Hunt ADDRESS _ 3755 Delaware AIt 4 CITE'/STATE (06)-7936 APPRAISAL VALUE I-and Value 71)11 ImproNemcnt Value 4420 Total Valuc 11610 A. FiftN (511) percent deterioration of non-supporting members." YES X ',O B. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' 1'ES X NO ( . Fire (I ama.,cd° YES X NO D. Enrolled in Wort: Repair Program? YES X NO 113/11/03 thru (17/14/03 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: This structure has had fire damage in the attic area. There is smoke damage throughout the structure from the fire The roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. 'The fascia boards are rotted There is water damage to the interior due to the fire. All dammed or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced The windows are covered with bars but are open allowing Nvater inside The side porch canopy is very deteriorated also the back porch is deteriorated. The porches are being used for homeless to hang out The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. There is termite damage to the structure The foundation has rotten sills. Some sa22ing. The interior- flooring, ceilings and walls are damaged and will need to be repaired The structure was viewed through the vNindows The exterior paint is peeling all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures wvilf need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. There has been no work from the enrolled work program and no permit was ever purchased. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50'%o of its appraised value, staff'is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE :ATTACHED PHOTOS ' S . �. k 4r�'wA1RM S • a y- _. -„msµ -�•-.. .. _�_ _y_ . �._ w lk 4 X 9�• 1560 COLLEGE • a . „ * e w, K 'W k 2 � iv k .. kl.. ,. ON w s b .+ .x •y+ � � - a �� � ��+ + s s x a .., a • +fib. :'., , • 4 - • k � k 3 tt p y�H r!; m , 1. V* 0 MRt AM 'q, • ;� � �� � ,° a ,�<� ',, ��.� - -d�"fie�3 • tea �i f F' 4 • YP ISO Wo $ M 71, fl 4 F a9 47 I� • a. a a ww It �. m " e , Vw M . f e 0. A� • WIN L4T f a. f w . F1 , x - to r 0 . jr y r i +.za limb lit" 4 Oak t` � v } L � r d t Cc r - .z I ry N ✓y f� Is.. �1 z iy. y i he e 41 I a SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION is (TI-Y OF BEAt MONT 7. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE November 3, 2003 NNARD I ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 5645 Comstock Road 01� Nl:R Robert D. Tanner ET UX XDDRESS 5390 Linda Lit CITY/STATE (08)-2522 XITRAISAL VAIA1: Land \ alue 84111 11111m cement Value ?791) Total V',line 16200 V Fift. (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO 13. ThirtN-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members." YES X NO C. Fire damaged:' YES NO X D. Enrolled in Work Repair Program:' YES X NO 12/04/03 thru 114104/03 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS. This structure's roof is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed The rear section of the roof has extensive deterioration attempts have been made to patch the roof. It appears that the structure is being used for storage The rafters are rotted There is water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. The back steps are missing The back door is damaged and will need to be ,-eplaced. The foundation has some sagging in the rear. The interior flooring ceilings and walls are dammed and will need to be repaired The ceilings are damaged all dammed electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. NO hermits have heen purchased. The vard is fenced in for horses Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50% of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS 9 a Aa a 7 _ p r w. p IA To T 5645 COMSTOCK RD t F7 f 4 ar 4 , r I PV y °- m �M , F 1 �Iltr' x • k g t w w Alk • a +�. ,"gym � Ki.pi�S,k�V c':2k: "� t ■' +.. a ^� - M. SVBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT Bt ILDING CODES DIVISION 0 CITY OF BEACNIONT 8- INITIAL INSPECTION DATE Mav 25, 2005 NNARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 3090 Concord (Commercial) ONNNER Joseph L. Ramey ADDRESS 3030 Gulf St. CITY/STATE (03)-4337 APPRAISAL VALC E Land Value 411911 Improwment Yaluc 5910 Total Value 10000 A. Fift} (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting meml)ers? YES X NO t3. I'll ir0-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO X 1). Enrolled in Work Repair Program? YES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The metal roof on this structure is rusty and deteriorated Some of the metal is pulling loose. The fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced all damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced The exterior doors are damaged and will need to be replaced. There is termite damage to the structure Some of the exterior siding is rotten and is pulling away from the structure. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced The property has a rental sign posted on the exterior wall. Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 501%, of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS �I II 4 = f. at Y Y � 4,S 9 i x se• r wT-�, .. ' I E , I Sam S t r I� q f 4 I . 3090 CONCORD RD (COMMERCIAL) x` e k � .k! � k � 3s" V alga } s b INN f r 4- f a ,x - # gy I ' r u, vat WNW � • � � c��� <.X'4 has 1 Il SUBSTANDARD DARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT BI ILDING CODES DIVISION CITY OF BEAT .\ION"F 9- INITIAL INSPECTION DATE July 7. 2004 NVARD 1 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 6715 Concord (Commercial) 0\NNI_R lna Farris ADDRESS 5465 Cole Rd. CITY/STATE (08)-4301 APPRAISAL Y_1LLE Land Yaluc 10830 Inprmanent \ aluc -12520 Total Yaluc 33350 �. Fifty (SII) percent deterioration of non-supporting members:' YES X N0 13. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members:' YES X NO ( . Fire damaged" YES NO x D. Enrolled in \York Repair Program:' Y'ES NO X MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this structure has extensive deterioration. There are holes throughout the roof. The roof is collapsing. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. "There is extensive water damage to the interior due to the condition of the roof. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be replaced. The exterior doors will need to be replaced all damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced also all damaged plumbing and t�lumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. The inspection was viewed through the windows The structure is secure. The property has a "For Sale" sign posted on the front of the building Based on the extensive repairs needed in this structure and the fact that these repairs will exceed over 50`%, of its appraised value staff is recommending a raze order for this structure. SEE .ATTACHED PHOTOS 4w{I{y; a w, •r '�. �''a gip.�;�: $f� • �� y�� .x :p"•'� s ry� 1•M :fi t 4 a�V.� .- , ^pM �' e`•'3fr k f �=Sx v�`6} �� .Mw a .� �x M4k 4 .*� � yr L3 •'T, i �` 1+ r �•w3 1 . r *rF g r t � 6 Vu y y� s � r _ I r ` d if N a r e a 1n rat