Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET NOV 23 2004 MAW� J IL City of Beaumont REGULAR.MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 23,2004 1:30 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA * Approval of minutes * Confirmation of committee appointments A) Approve a resolution certifying that the Small Business Revolving Loan fund(RLF)plan is consistent with and supportive of the area's current economic adjustment strategy; and the RLF is being operated in accordance with the policies and procedures contained in the RLF Plan and the loan portfolio meets the standards contained therein B) Approve a resolution authorizing the settlement of the lawsuit styled Gerald Cerda v City of Beaumont Ci of Beaumont ty M OL•�• Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kandy Daniel, Treasurer MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED AC'T'ION: Council consider a resolution certifying that the Small Business Revolving Loan fund(RLF) plan is consistent with and supportive of the area's current economic adjustment strategy; and the RLF is being operated in accordance with the policies and procedures contained in the RLF Plan and the loan portfolio meets the standards contained therein. RECOMMENDATION The administration requests approval of a resolution certifying that the Small Business Revolving Loan fund (RLF)plan is consistent with and supportive of the area's current economic adjustment strategy; and the RLF is being operated in accordance with the policies and procedures contained in the RLF Plan and the loan portfolio meets the standards contained therein. BACKGROUND The Small Business Revolving Loan Program was created with an initial grant from EDA of$500,000 with matching funds from CDBG of$250,000. To be approved for the grant,the city was required to develop a plan to support the area's economic development strategy and to create policies and procedures to administer the program. The original City of Beaumont RLF Plan was adopted by the City Council on February 24, 1987 and was last re-certified on November 18, 2003. EDA requires that the plan be certified on an annual basis. There have been no changes to the RLF plan since it was last certified. BUDGETARY IMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION The RLF Plan was re-certified on November 18, 2003. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Finance Officer. I. PROGRAM ELEMENT TO THE PLAN A. Goals and Objectives 1. COMMITMENT TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: The Economic Development Policy Plan consists of goals, objectives, policies, and proposals for guiding Beaumont's future economic growth and development. Outside assistance is provided through a contact with the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce for various economic development activities such as marketing analysis, business retention efforts and working with business prospects. 2. GOAL: INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PERMANENT JOBS AVAILABLE TO CITIZENS OF BEAUMONT AND SOUTHEAST TEXAS Emphasis should be placed on value added jobs which are most likely to lead to further job creation. Jobs in "export" industries bring money into the region through production of goods or services that are exported outside of Beaumont. These jobs, which are generally highly paid, create spendable household income, thus generating new jobs in sales and services. Beaumont also needs jobs which can be filled by workers who were previously employed in shipyards, refineries, and chemical plants. These skilled workers are among Beaumont's most valuable economic resources and will leave the area if new job opportunities are not developed. Because of an especially high unemployment rate among Beaumont's sizable minority population, entry level jobs with on-the-job training are needed to bring unskilled workers from low-income backgrounds into the work force. WHERE WILL THESE JOBS COME FROM? New jobs come from three sources: 1) expansion of existing businesses 2) creation of new, entrepreneurial enterprises 3) attraction of plants or businesses from outside the community Research indicates that expansion of existing businesses and creation of entrepreneurial enterprises account for 80 to 90% of all new jobs. 1 e T 1 OBJECTIVE NO 1: MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE ROLE FOR THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Policy 1.1 Role of the City The City will continue to serve in a leadership role in the following areas of economic development: A. Strategic Planning - analyzing Beaumont's competitive strengths and weaknesses in the world economy and then taking aggressive action to capitalize on the strengths and overcome the weaknesses. B. Legislative Advocacy - working closely with Jefferson County, The Port of Beaumont, Drainage District #6, the Jefferson County Navigation District, B1SD, other municipalities in the region, and other State and Federal elected officials to secure major funding assistance and to enact or change laws to increase the strategic competitiveness of the local/regional economy. C. Leveraging and Public/Private Partnerships - using the limited resources available to the City government, such as grants, development incentives, infrastructure, land, and staff to attract private sector investments which will create or retain jobs and/or increase the tax base. D. Develop and Communicate a Vision of the Future - the City's elected officials and staff must motivate the community to set its sights on the goal of becoming a first- class medium-sized city with a quality of life capable of attracting new private investment and population. The City will serve in a leadership and cooperative role in the following areas, participating actively and lending whatever support is needed to other members of the economic development network: 2 A. Promotion; assisting the Chamber of Commerce, the Convention and Visitors Bureau, BUILD, Inc./Beaumont Main Street, Entergy, and other promotional groups in marketing Beaumont as a business location, tourist, destination, etc. B. Business Attraction: working cooperatively with the Chamber/Economic Development Council in attracting new industry. Policy 1.2 The City's Commitment The City will commit the assets it has available--staff, incentives, land, taxing authority, infrastructure, tax- exempt bonding authority, and access to State and Federal grants--to the local and regional economic development efforts. The City will also strive for excellence in conducting its basic responsibilities of providing public services and infrastructure, recognizing that an efficient, competent and responsive city government is one of the prerequisites for economic growth of a community. Allocation of resources for construction of new or the repair or extension of existing city infrastructure and new or revised city services will be implemented on the basis of need; however, the impact of such actions on the economic development of the City as a whole will be considered of overriding importance when deciding where to allocate the City's resources among areas which are of equal need. Policy 13 Public Return on Investment The City will examine the potential return on the public's investment when determining where and how its limited resources will be committed. Return on public investment will be measured in terms of jobs created, jobs retained, and broadening of the tax base. OBJECTIVE NO. 2 ENCOURAGE A CLIMATE WHICH FACILITATES BUSINESS GROWTH AND SUSTAIN ABILITY . r Policy 2.1 The City .of Beaumont recognizes that the degree of cooperation and support of local government plays a major role in business location and expansion decisions. The City resolves to improve both its efficiency and effectiveness in providing assistance and services to business. Policy 2.2 The City of Beaumont will be committed to improving the quality of life for current and future residents. In recognition of the connection between economic development, the qualify of life or livability of a city, and the development of a favorable sense of place among residents and non-residents alike, the City supports the inclusion of "quality of life" and "environmental quality" considerations in making planning and development decisions. Visual community appearance considerations in the city's planning and development efforts are to be considered important economic development actions which will improve Beaumont's ability to attract new businesses and employment opportunities. In realization of the fact that investing in the overall improvement in the quality of life or livability of the City is not a goal which can be achieved overnight, the City will concentrate its resources on the cleanup and rehabilitation of selected neighborhoods and on the development and implementation of urban design plans for selected open space, street corridor, and city entrance or gateway areas. OBJECTIVE NO 3: ATTRACT NEW BUSINESSES AND INDUSTRIES TO THE BEAUMONT AREA Policy 3.1 The City will work with the Chamber of Commerce and other economic development groups in a team effort to bring new businesses and industries to the Beaumont area. Policy 3.2 Efforts to attract new business and industry will be targeted on industries whose locational needs are consistent with the Beaumont area's locational attributes. 4 Policy 3.3 Continue to promote the Beaumont area's resources and quality of life factors through the efforts of the Beaumont Convention and Visitors Bureau. OBJECTIVE NO 4: RETAIN AND EXPAND EXISTING BUSINESSES AND INDUSTRIES Policy 4.1 The City of Beaumont Recognizes that existing businesses and industries are the community's most important economic resources and will support the efforts of existing businesses to expand and improve operations. Policy 4.2 An "outreach" program to foster open lines of communication between the city government and existing businesses and industries will continue. OBJECTIVE NO 5: STIMULATE THE CREATION OF NEW BUSINESSES Policy 5.1 Continue the City's Small Business Revolving Loan Fund which provides financing assistance for new businesses having difficulty in obtaining conventional financing. Policy 5.2 Continue work with the Small Business Development Center at Lamar University, which assists start up businesses and processes applications for the City's Small Business Revolving Loan Fund. OBJECTIVE NO. 6 IMPROVE THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES OF THE BEAUMONT AREA ECONOMY Policy 6.1 The City of Beaumont will assume a role of partnership with local business and industry in competing with producers in other regions, states and countries. This means city actions involving taxes, infrastructure, regulations and development incentives will focus on making it easier, more efficient and more advantageous for doing business in Beaumont. Policy 6.2 Expand the scope of Beaumont's market area by capitalizing on its role as a regional center of trade, professional services, entertainment, distribution, and medical services. 5 B. Identification of the Area's Financing Problems A review of Beaumont's capital market and discussions with local small business persons indicate the local capital market has the following characteristics. 1. Beaumont banks typically follow conservative policies and practices regarding allocation of deposits for lending purposes. While this is not unique to Beaumont or the region, the adverse effect of the local and statewide economy has even further reduced the availability of the banks capital in Beaumont. Beaumont banks are looking for additional outside capital projects as a cushion for their loans. 2. There is reluctance to provide financing to younger or higher risk companies or to companies located in blighted or depressed areas of the community. 3. There is a shortage of long term reasonably priced commercial financing available to small businesses located in Beaumont. 4. Local banks appear to be reluctant to make loans smaller than $75,000.00 5. There is a lack of capital for minority businesses. The Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) will serve a critical function in the City's economic development program by providing assistance in financing small business that will provide jobs primarily for persons of low and moderate income, the unemployed, and the underemployed, and projects which will diversify and strengthen Beaumont's economic base. Specific Objectives of the Revolving Loan Fund: The Revolving Loan Fund will promote economic development by: 1. Creating New Employment Opportunities: The Revolving Loan Fund will be utilized to assist in expansion or creation of small business enterprises, owned or operated by minorities, women, or the economically disadvantaged. 2. Increasing Private Financing Availability: Revolving loan fund monies will be used to leverage private financing for small business, availability 6 of financing for small. business enterprises owned or operated by minorities, women or the economically disadvantaged and to provide incentives to the financial institutions to make loans to small businesses. C. Targeting Criteria The Revolving Loan Fund will target small businesses which can best assist the City in achieving economic development objectives. The order or priority will be: I 1. Small businesses which will create the greatest number of jobs available to the unemployed, underemployed, or low or moderate income persons at the least cost to the Revolving Loan Fund; 2. Small businesses which are owned and operated by minorities, women, or the economically disadvantaged; 3. Small businesses that are located within Beaumont's Community Development and Housing Neighborhood Strategy Areas. D. Standards for the Revolving Loan Fund Portfolios To ensure the effectiveness of the Revolving Loan Fund as an economic development tool, the following standards will serve as guidelines for Revolving Loan Fund participation: 1. It is the objective of the Revolving Loan Fund to leverage each dollar three to four times through participation with private sector lending institutions, the SBA and other government loan programs and private investors. For each$10,000 of total investment, one job will be generated. The Revolving Loan Fund will leverage two private sector dollars for every one RFL dollar at a minimum. 2. Revolving Loan Fund monies will be available to finance the expansion and start-up needs of small businesses. Financing will be available for fixed assets (plant and equipment) and for working capital. The Revolving Loan fund will give priority to the businesses that create the maximum number of new jobs. 7 All Revolving Loan Fund applicants will be screened for potential use of vacant facilities located in blighted areas of the community. 2. Other economic development objectives and standards include the following: The Revolving Loan Fund borrower will be required to have a 10% equity in the project. Minorities and females will be encouraged to participate in the Revolving Loan fund. To prevent displacement of existing capital, all applicants must have written evidence of the need for the RLF funds. E. Financing Policies: The Revolving Loan Fund will include the following goals: 1. The Revolving Loan Fund loans are expected to range between $10,000 and $100,000. 2. No more than 20% of the total SBRLF contributed capital shall be loaned to any one borrower during any one time period. 3. Terms and Conditions of the Loans The expected amortization period for Revolving Loan Fund loans will be as follows: Working capital loans: Negotiated within normal commercial financing range Machinery and Equipment: Based upon the useful life of equipment financed Land and Building: 15 -25 years 4. Interest Rates: Interest rates for all Revolving Loan Fund loans will be variable depending on the needs and financial condition of the applicant. Interest rate floors and ceiling will be established. The minimum interest rate will be four percent. 8 5. Special Financing Techniques: Revolving Loan Fund staff and administration will employ flexible financing techniques designed to meet the needs of the borrowers and to maximize the effectiveness of the Revolving Loan Fund program. The special financing techniques that may be utilized include: Lower than market rates. Extended amortization period for loans. Moratoriums on loan payments for a specified period of time. 6. Collateral and Equity requirements: Fixed asset financing will be secured by the fixed assets financed with other assets included if required. Collateral for working capital loans will include inventory, accounts receivable, fixed assets, cash and personal guarantees. The Revolving Loan Fund will mandate the contribution of equity by the. borrower, requiring not less than 10%. 7. Restructuring Loans: The Revolving Loan Fund will not be involved in restructuring loans or in refinancing projects. 8. Use of repaid recaptured Revolving Loan Fund interest and principal funds: Repayments of interest and principal will be used for additional loans. Revolving Loan Fund administrative staff will be paid by the City of Beaumont or Community Development Block Grant Funds. Origination fees and other fees earned by the Revolving Loan Fund will be used in the administration of the loan program. These administrative costs will be exclusive to the loan program. 9. Participation with other loan programs: To accomplish the stated goals of the Revolving Loan Fund, participation on loans with the following financial institutions is anticipated: • Banks throughout the City. • Small Business Administration. • Farmer's Home Administration. • SBA Certified Development Corporation (504's). • SBA Small Business Investment Corporation (MESBIC). 9 • Savings and Loan Associations. • Local equity capital funds. F. Related Activities: ` 1. Loan Packaging and Referral Service: The Revolving Loan Fund loans will be packaged by the staff in cooperation with the loan officer and staff of the participating financial organization. Those applicants who do not qualify for Revolving Loan Fund loans but are viable applicants for other financing assistance will be referred to the local office of the Small Business Administration, the Southeast Texas Economic Development Foundation (A SBA 504), and other commercial banks or savings and loans in the community. 2. Linking Jobs to the Long-Term Unemployed: Should the borrowers need assistance in recruiting the long-term unemployed and low-income persons, the company will be referred to agencies capable of providing assistance. Those agencies include: • Texas Workforce Center • Local Employment Agencies • Advertisement in Local Newspapers 10 II. Administrative Element of the Plan F. Loan Administration Board The Mayor and City Council establishes citizen advisory boards, committees and commissions and appoints citizens within the community to serve on these various committees by approval of City Council. A Loan Administration Board will be formed with the membership as follows: 1. Members will be drawn from local financial institutions. 2. Other members will be appointed from the Small Business Development Center at Lamar University. 3. One member will be appointed representing the City of Beaumont. 4. The remaining members will be appointed from small and minority businesses or community organizations. Provisions will be made to assure strong representation among women and minorities. At least one member with financing experience must be present for each loan decision. Board members will be appointed to two year terms, which will be staggered to assure continuity on the board. The board will include members from both the public and private sectors. B. Staff The City's Finance Department, Cash Management Division, will provide support staff to the Revolving Loan Fund. The Cash Management staff has experience in analysis of business operations and financial statements and substantial billing and collection experience. The RLF staff will work closely with the particular commercial lending officers of the private financial institution(s) involved in the leveraging of each loan. The loan packages will be prepared to provide adequate loan security and allow maximum operating flexibility to the borrowers. C. Conflict of Interest 2. RLF funds shall not be available to a business entity if the owner of such entity or any owner of an interest in such entity is related by blood, marriage, law or business arrangement to an employee of the City of Beaumont or any member of the City Council, or a member of the SBRLF Loan Advisory Board unless the person(s) affected first discloses in writing to the Loan Advisory Board the potential benefit and the Loan 11 Advisory Board determines that the benefit involved is not so substantial as to affect the integrity of the Board's decision process. 3. An officer, employee or board member of the SBRLF shall not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment or any other thing of monetary value for himself or for another person, from any person or organization seeking to obtain a loan. 4. Former Loan Advisory Board members and/or officers =are ineligible to apply for or receive loan funds for a period of one year from the date of termination of his/her service. D. Loan Selection and Approval Process 2. Marketing The Finance Department will have a coordinative managerial role in the areas of capital formation and supporting the existing network of economic development groups active in the area. The staff will also continue its ongoing contacts with the SBA and financial institutions. Presentations will be made to the Chamber of Commerce, Minority Business Development Organizations and other potential sources of applicants. 3. Screening Potential applicants for the RLF will be screened by the staff at the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) at Lamar University and participating financial institutions. Preliminary screening by the (SBDC) will include, but will not be limited to the following: • Eligibility criteria • Ownership and organizational structure • Potential for job creation • Funding requirements If the preliminary screening process indicates that the potential applicant is appropriate for the RLF, the applicant will be invited to make full application. The RLF staff and the Small Business Development Center will provide technical assistance to help applicants with the preparation of necessary documents. Applicants that are ineligible will be referred to 12 other sources which maybe appropriate including the SBA, the local 504 Corporation or other programs which may fit the needs of the applicant. 3. Applications At this phase of the process, the following information may be requested from the applicant and his/her financial institution: • Application Form • Summary description of business and the project being financed • Financial Statement(3 years) • Projection (3 years) Assumption (2 years existing) New Company (3 years) Profit and Loss Statements; Balance Sheets; Cash Flow Analysis • Personal Financial Statements • Cost Summary • Listing of Collateral • Commitment Letter • Appraisal (Financing Real Estate) • Jobs Form • Resume on Principals • Business Plans New (detailed description of the business to include the market, competition, location, management, personnel, and purpose of loan) Existing (one page document describing plans to grow or expand) • Certification of Cost — Architectural estimates; equipment vendor quotes; construction cost estimates 4. Evaluations Once all materials requested from the applicant have been submitted, an analysis of the loan request will occur. • Staff assembles the information into a complete package and submits to the Loan Advisory Board for review. A decision is based upon factors including, but not limited to: • the ability of the applicant to repay the loan, 13 i v • the applicant's managerial capabilities, • the long term retention of jobs that will be provided. 5. Considerations All loans shall be presented to the Loan Advisory Board for consideration. Applicants will be afforded an opportunity to address tfie Board and to answer questions. 6. Loan Closing Once final approval has been authorized by the board, staff will assist in preparation of loan closing documents in conjunction with the financial institution, including necessary deeds of trust, liens, mortgage instruments and loan agreements. 7. Disbursement Prior to closing, a schedule of loan disbursements will have been negotiated. 8. Monitoring Monitoring of the implementation of the project will begin after the initial disbursement. Continuing technical assistance will be provided as needed by RLF staff. The Grant's Administration Division will provide assistance with environmental impact and Davis-Bacon wage requirement issues. E. Loan Servicing The loan will be serviced in house by RLF staff who will institute a portfolio management system which monitors each loan on an ongoing basis for timely payment. A servicing agreement may be established with an outside agency to service the loans for the city, if cost effective, where funds will be returned to the Revolving Loan Fund by the private financial institutions on at least a quarterly basis. If a default appears eminent, the staff of the RLF will work with the financial institution to avert such an occurrence. When default cannot be averted, the staff will commence foreclosure proceedings as mandated by State Law. 14 F. Administrative Costs Administrative costs will be provided by city funds or Community Development Block Grant funds. The City will allocate funds from the interest paid to the RLF and program fees if such funding sources become necessary. G. Recapitalization Strategy Capitalization of the RLF will be accomplished through program income funds from the CDBG program. H. Other Requirements 1. Compliance with Civil Rights Laws: Applicants for RLF assistance will be required to pledge not to discriminate against employment applicants. They will be required to sign an affidavit to that effect at the loan closing. Any proven instance of discrimination proven against the loan applicant shall be grounds for calling the loan. Compliance will be monitored on an annual basis. Active loans will be reviewed at least annually. Borrowers will be required to submit personnel data concerning the status of jobs which were created under the RLF, including pay scales, sex, and ethnicity. 2. Environmental Impact: Staff will consider the environmental impact of all proposed projects. (See Environmental Review Record Appendix III.) 3. Access for the Handicapped: All buildings involved in the proposed project must be made accessible for persons with impaired mobility. 4. Insurance: Key man insurance, flood hazard insurance, liability insurance, or other types may be required of the applicant. 5. Davis-Bacon: Construction financed in whole or in part by the RLF will meet the requirement of the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a-5). 15 6. Relocation: The location of loan projects will be located within the city limits of Beaumont. The City of Beaumont assures that loans will be recalled if the project and/or business activity move from the area. Businesses relocating jobs from another labor area are not eligible borrowers. 16 PART V Aaprovel Expires January 31, 1481 ASSURANCES The applicant hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and re- quirements, including Executive Order 12372, OMB Circu- 10. It will complyy with the requirements of Title II find Title lars No. A-21, A-87, A-102, and A-110 as they relate to III of the lJniform llelocation Assistance and Reel the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-6•t6) ..hick this federally assisted project. Also, the Applicant gives Provides for fnir rind equitable treatment of persons assurance and certifies with respect to the grant that: displaced as o result of Federal and federally assisted programs. 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant, and to finance and construct the proposed facilities; that a 11. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, resolution, motion or similar action has been duly lease or supervison which shall be utilized in the adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's accomplishment of the project fire not listed on the 'overiing body, authorizing the filing of the application, Frivironmental Protection Agency's (F.PA) List of including all understandings and assurances contained Violating Facilities and that`;t will notify the Federal therein, and directing and authorizing the person 1�rantor agency of the receipt of any communication from identified as the official representative of the applicant the Director of the EPA Office of Environmental Review to act in connection with the application and to provide indicating that a facility to be utilized in the project such additional information as may be required. is tinder consideration for listing by the EPA. 2. It will give the sponsoring agency and the Comptroller 12. It will comply with the flood insurance purchase revuire- General through any authorized representative access to ments of Section 102(x) of the Flood Disaster Protection and the right to examine all records, books,papers, or Act of 1973, Puhlic Law 93-234, fl:' Stet. 975, approved documents related to the grant. Uecemher 31, 1976. Section 102(1) requires, on and 3. It will comply with all requirements imposed by FDA after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance to concerning special requirements of law, program require- communities where such insurance is available as a ments, and other administrative re�I ttirements approved condition for :the receipt of any Federal financial in accordance with OMB Circular A-102. assistance for construction or ncq+lisition pure poses for project use in any area that has been identified by th Secretary 4. The rite at will be properly end efficiently administered, of the Department of (lousing and Urban Develorment operetend maintained. as an area having special flood hazards. The p)trase 5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from "Federal financial assistance" includes anv form of using their positions for a Purpose that is or gives the loan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, sub- appearance of being motivated by a desire for private silly, `'isester assistance loan or grant, or any other gain for themselves or others, particularly those with form of direct or indirect Federal assistance. whom they have family, business, or other ties. 13. It will assist F,DA in its compliance with Section i05 of 6. It will comply with the provisions of the (latch Act the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as which limit the political activity of employees, amended (16 U.S.C. •170), Executive Order 11593, and 7. It will comp)q with the minimum wage and maximum hours the Archeolo leaf and Historic ['reservation Act of 1966 provisions o[ the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as O6 U.S.C. •f69a-1 et seq.) by (a) consulting with the they apply to hospital and educational institution State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of employees of State and local governments. illy es tigntions, is necessary, to identify properties 8. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of listed in or ell ible for inclusion in the National Reeister 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and in accordance with Title V1 of of llistoric P�aces that are subject to adverse effects that Act, no person n the United States shall, on the (sce 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying gground t, race, color, or national origin, be axon the EDA of the existence of any such properties, ana by Irom participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be (1') comply in with all requirements established by otherwise subjected to discrimination under any ppro ram E,DA to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon suctt or activity for which the applicant receives Fe�eral properties. financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the Applicant, this assurance shall obligate the Appli- If the Project involves the acquisition or development of land cant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, or the acquisition, construction, rehnhiliiation, alteration, any transferee, for the period during which the real expansion or improvement of a facility, the Applicant further property or structure is used for n purpose or for assures and certifies that: another purpose involving the provision of similar 14, It will cause work on the pru!ret to he commenced services or benefits. within a rensonnhle time niter receipt of notification 9. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act from FDA indicating that funds have been approved and of 1964 (42 11SC 2000d) prohibiting employment dis- 'hat the Project will be prosecuted to com pietion with criminntion where (1) the pprimnry purpose of n grant is reasonable diligence. to provide employment or (2) discriminatory rmploymrni 15, It will comply with the rpvi inns o(: F'xr practices will rrsll in usequul treatment of prrsnns who f 191;8, rehiring o floral Inin nrnnn rmrniCCitive t1r`irr are or should for benefiting from the grant-aided activity. „ R I' g Fxecuti.e Orde.r 112>6, relating In rvnluauon nl !!,+od 'ta:ardt; I[ will comply with the civil right laws listed Ilained Executive Order I1^_011, rrintin• to the The nppliration nl the.sr laws is dr,scribed and explained control and albntr'nirnt .,I wnu-r� nllutio Prr+rnt'on, in F'UA's Civil Itights Guidelines. t)rder I IL"O p n: .xrcntive rrintin( in )+rnirril,+n of w dnnds, anti 13 a. Section 112 of Public I,aw 92-65 (42 U.S.C. 3123). CF11 309.15(a), relating to rxppsnre of the f+to)eet to Prohibits sex discrimination in nssistanre providr,l undue risk of flood. under the I'uhlic Wnrks and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, 16. It will not 'lisln r• of nr t-ncumher its title fir other nter- rsts in the srtr ,nil I.iriluirl hiring b. Section 911) of ihr hits Rehabilitation rim Art ;i Ir)73 fill F rdrral iuirrr<! or .bile the C,,.ernmrnt 'rulds cons, U.S.C. ;9t1• Prc,hihits discrimination against tlir hnn.licnf+rr,r,l in any program or activity rrcriving whichever is thr lurlgpr- Federal financial nssistance. 17• f•onstrti iiun financed in +.hnl• ­r in : art c. Air nvidrd under I file I.Y ,+1 ihr 1'ul• is (�'ntiv r fir,• Uisrrilnination Art of 1975 (12 U.S.C. C.10^_). n,i K.ccnor„c Prohibits litirrimmali rn on the hnsis n( ;rpr in anv �)rvrlopmrnt Art .,I I'>r,5, as .rmrnuJ d, -iiI --t All Program or activity rrceiving Frderal ussit;tancr, e` iirrt^rents of ihr Uavi.-liacnn 1ct, .t. amenueo ( 10 U1C. _76a-276a-",). f f?f ED-S40 (S-65) Ib Approval Expires January 31, 19E7 ASSURANCES - Continued I8. It will have sufficient funds nvnilable to meet the non- 20. It will provide and maintain rnmpercnt and a,l­luote Faders) share of the coat for construction projects, architectural engineering supervinton and inspection at Sufficient funds will be available when construction is cite construction mite to Inure that tite com�ietrd -ork completed to assure effective operation and maintenance ronforms with the approved plans and specifications; Of the facility for the purposes constructed. that it will furnish progress rrports and such other 19. It will obtain approval by EDA of the final working information as EDA may require. drawings and specifications before the project is 21. It will operate and maintain the facility in accordance advertised or placed on the market for bidding; that it with the minimum stnndards as may be rrnuired or pre- will construct the project, or cause it to be constructed, scribed by the applicable Federal, State and local to final completion in accordance with the application agencies for the maintenance and operation of such and approved plans and specifications; that it, will facilities. submit to EDA for prior approval changes that alter the costs of the project, use of space, or functional layout ^_2. It Fill require the facility to be drsiened to cc-toly with that it will not enter into a construction cantract(s) for the ' American Standard Specifications nr !.lakin the pro)'ect or undertake other activities until the condi- Buildings and Facilities Accessible ta, .,n,i I'sahle Cvq tions of the construction grant program(s) have been met. the Physically Ilan dicapped,'• Numher A-i1'-1-1961. ns modified (All (:FR 101-1;X03). 'fhe applicant will be responsible for conducting inspections to insure compliance with these specifications by the contractor. 17 Approval Expire• Janu ary J1, 1487 Port VI Section B Environmental Information For All Projects j Item 1. Are any facilities under your ownership, lease or supervision to be utilized in the accomplishment of this project, 1 either listed or under consideration for luting on the Environmental Agency's List of Violating.Facilities? i []Yes ®No For Adjustment Implementation Projects iV/A Item 2. (a) Provide a flood plain map as EXHIBIT V1-B2 in accord with Item 3(b)(iii), regardless of whether an Environmental ! Impact Statement has been or must be prepared. (b) Is the project safe from flooding? [] Yes ❑ No (c) Is the flood insurance available? ❑Yes ❑No (d) Has flood insurance ever been purchased? ❑Yes ❑No FOR ADJUSTMENT IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS ONLY (Omit if previously submitted) Item 3. (a) Has a Federal, State or Local Environmental Impact Statement or Analysis been prepared involving this property or its site? ❑Yes Q No ! ❑Copy attached as EXHIBIT VI-83 i (b) If "NO," provide the information requested in Instructions as EXHIBIT VI-133 Item 4. (a) The State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO).has been provided a detailed project description and has been requested to submit comments to the appropriate EDA Regional Office on 42/25/87 t dare) (b) Attach a copy of material submitted to SIiPO and any comments received from SHPO as EXHIBIT VI-84. (c) If a building is involved in the project, is it over SO years old? Yes [_Xl No ! Item 5. Is the project site(s) located within or adjacent to any of the following areas? Check appropriate box for every item of the following checklist: YES NO UNKNOWN YES NO UNKNOWN j (1) ❑ ❑ Q Industrial (14) [�] ❑ ❑ Estuary (2) Q ❑ ❑ Commercial (15) ❑ ❑ ❑ Wetlands i (3) Q ❑ ❑ Residential (16) ❑ ❑ ❑ Flood plain (4) ❑ ❑ ❑ Agricultural (17) ❑ ❑ ❑ Wilderness(designated or proposed under the Wildeiness I (5) ❑ ❑ ❑ Mining, Quarring Act) (6) F-1 ❑ ❑ Forests (18) Q (� ❑ Wild or Scenic river(proeosed or I designated under t)e Wild and I (7) ❑ ❑ ❑ Recreational Scenic Rivers Act) (8) [] ❑ ❑ Parks (19) ❑ ❑ (� disloncal, Archeelcg cal S;!es _ (Listed an the "lntrcnat pelister (9) ❑ L] [] Hospitals M ll�s! nc Places or +yhict -y he eligible for Irs!:ng) (10) Q Schools (20) �_� ❑, Critical flibitals endan�pre^� threatened species V (I1) ❑ ❑ Ell Aquifer Recharge Area (12) S leep Slopes E]721) �� �— 'inn tinurr enI ;ca ,,r s (13) Wildlife Refuge ( �) — _� n,=*t (S-8S) 13 �. City o f Beaumont , ..~. Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Tyrone E. Cooper, City Attorney MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 18, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Consider a resolution authorizing the settlement of the lawsuit styled Gerald Cerda v City of Beaumont. RECOMMENDATION Council approval of a resolution authorizing the settlement of a lawsuit styled Gerald Cerda v City of Beaumont. BACKGROUND Council discussed the settlement of this lawsuit in Executive Session November 16, 2004. BUDGETARY IMPACT There are sufficient funds in the Liability Trust Fund to pay the settlement amount of$110,000. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and City Attorney. G:\CGW GENDA\RESOLUTI\CLAIMLAW.DOC\AGEN MEMO-LAWCERDA-TC-04.wpd City of Beaumont REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 23, 2004 1:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER * Invocation Pledge Roll Call * Presentations and Recognition * Public Comment: Persons may speak on scheduled agenda items 6-10/Consent Agenda * Consent Agenda GENERAL BUSINESS 1. Consider approving a request for a zone change from RM-H(Residential Multiple Family Dwelling-Highest Density)to GC-MD(General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 3250 Glenwood Street 2. Consider approving a request for a zone change from RCR(Residential Conservation and Revitalization)to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 995-997 Avenue B 3. Consider approving a request for a zone change from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 270 E. Chapin 4. Consider approving a request for a specific use permit to allow a mother-in- law/guest quarters in an RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling)District for property located at 2098 Briarcliff 5. Consider approving a request for a specific use permit to allow a cellular telephone transmission tower in a GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 4151-65 Gladys 6. Consider approving a request to abandon the west 10'of a 20'wide utility easement being the east 20'of Lots 26 and 27, Block 15, Calder Place Addition at 580 and 590 24' Street 7. Consider approving a contract between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont Community Housing Development Organization(BCHDO) 8. Consider approving the purchase of a tractor for use in the Parks Division 9. Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Bunn's Bluff Canal-- Levee Improvement Project amount for"extra work" 10. Consider amending Ordinance No. 04-079 relating to the structure located at 1955 Delaware COMMENTS * Councilmembers/City Manager comment on various matters * Public Comment(Persons are limited to 3 minutes) EXECUTIVE SESSION * Consider matters related to contemplated or pending litigation in accordance with Section 551.071 of the Government Code: Southeast Texas Community Development Corporation Claim of Kimberly Smith, Tori Smith, and Taylor Smith Penni Simonson, et al v. City of Beaumont City of Beaumont vs. House of Praise Deliverance Ministry, Inc. * Consider matters related to employment, evaluation and duties of a public officer or employee in accordance with Section 551.074 of the Government Code: Municipal Magistrate Theodore Johns Chief Magistrate James McNicholas Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact Pat Buehrle at 880-3725 a day prior to the meeting. I November 23, 2004 Consider approving a request for a zone change from RM-H(Residential Multiple Family Dwelling-Highest Density)to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 3250 Glenwood Street . Cit y of Beaumont �• Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a zone change from RM-H (Residential Multiple Family Dwelling-Highest Density) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling)District for property located at 3250 Glenwood Street. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of a zone change from RM-H (Residential Multiple Family Dwelling-Highest Density) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 3250 Glenwood Street. BACKGROUND James B. Davis, the property owner, is requesting a zone change for the property located at 3250 Glenwood. Mr.Davis has operated a car repair shop at this location for six years. Prior to Mr.Davis purchasing the property, it was used by Beaumont Vault Company as a burial vault company. In October, Neighborhood Services cited Mr. Davis for several junk motor vehicle violations. At that time, the Planning Division was notified to see if the business was a legal use. The Planning Division found that Mr.Davis has been operating without the proper zoning and notified him of the need to request a zone change. BUDGETARYIMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Joint Public Hearing held November 15, 2004,the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve a zone change from RM-H (Residential Multiple Family Dwelling-Highest Density) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 3250 Glenwood Street. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. ' FI N I• A• I! M AV 1 _ A M N I is I• Air Y� K imx N '• 'r r - � I FILE 1750-Z: Request for a zone change from RM g � • � to GC-MD ( (Residential Multiple Family NORTH ,, ,t Dwelling-Highest Density) General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District or a more restrictive district. Location: 3250 Glenwood Street Applicant: James B. Davis SCALE 191=2001 a u Ar a /•� rt a I• � ,• . � � "1 ST. JAMES BLVD. AW J t ,� a• S /? w o � o O w a w• Is ,r I• ` -� •r 0 u a Ti a GLENWOOD AVE. /-9 . ! O J N N /• q• �� N /r jr ft / t • R� P/ M a. • a 0 1 ' Et ANNA or $ ELMIRA ST. y RM � Z �r 2 November 23,2004 Consider approving a request for a zone change from RCR(Residential Conservation and Revitalization)to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling)District for property located at 995-997 Avenue B City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a zone change from RCR(Residential Conservation and Revitalization) to GC-MD (General Commercial- Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 995-997 Avenue B. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends denial of a zone change from RCR(Residential Conservation and Revitalization) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 995-997 Avenue B. BACKGROUND Jesus Gonzales,the property owner, is requesting a zone change from RCR to GC-MD for property located at 995-997 Avenue B. The property is currently vacant. Mr. Gonzales states that the purpose of the rezoning is to operate a tire and auto repair shop on the subject property. This request could be considered spot zoning. When determining whether a spot zoning condition exists, the following issues must be addressed. 1) The law demands that the approved zoning plan should be respected and not altered for the special benefit of the landowner when the change will cause substantial detriment to the surrounding land or serve no substantial public purpose. Would the zone change be in compliance with the adopted comprehensive plan? The surrounding properties are zoned RCR and are either vacant or residential in nature. The Avenues/College Street Area Neighborhood Plan designates this area for mixed residential and limited commercial uses. This area was rezoned to RCR to allow for some compatible commercial uses. An auto repair shop is permitted in an RCR District with a specific use permit. However, a tire and auto repair shop at this location would be detrimental to the surrounding properties. 2) Will this change adversely impact the surrounding properties? The nature and degree of an adverse impact upon neighboring lands is important. Lots that are rezoned in a way that is substantially inconsistent with the zoning of the surrounding area, whether more or less restrictive, are likely to be invalid. The Planning Manager thinks that the nature of the proposed business will adversely impact the surrounding properties. The surrounding area is basically residential in nature. If this property is rezoned to GC-MD, it would be surrounded by RCR zoning. GC-MD zoning would allow for a myriad of uses not particularly compatible with residential uses. 3) Is the tract of land suitable or unsuitable for use as presently zoned? This is a factor. The size, shape and location of a tract of land or lot may render it unusable or even confiscatory as zoned. The land, as presently zoned,is suitable for residential uses. There is nothing out of the ordinary that would preclude it from being developed as zoned. 4) Does the proposed zone change bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,morals or general welfare orprotect andpreserve historical and cultural places and areas. The amendatory ordinance must bear a substantial relationship to the aforementioned considerations. The rezoning of this property, as proposed, would allow for uses that could be detrimental to the surrounding area. BUDGETARY IMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Joint Public Hearing held November 15, 2004, the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to deny a zone change from RCR (Residential Conservation and Revitalization) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District or a more restrictive district for property located at 995-997 Avenue B,but waive the 12 month waiting period should the applicant choose to apply for a specific use permit. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. Kcs e2 ._yam FII.E 1751-Z: Request for a zone change from RCR(Residential Conservation and NORTH �- Revitalization) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District or more restrictive district. �& Location: 995-997 Avenue B SCALE Applicant: Jesus Gonzalez 1"=200' •� 00 Gh • \ • \ t° . \� • 10 t• S h 0 t • t O� • o '� � � o• 1Z\ a ,•t ° �• �° tt ZG t is t••5 t• o / . d �,t•• �� '9L • o tiG ' ,y° ,o• d• 96 b r• t°` t► t•� 1•t /' t�._q '3a / •• • / t� ,fit 1°, r 10 4A t� t•• r •t CIO 161" •t c °6 t•• , t• w• / t•• i �L /- >� 6g6 ", •o V 0pL >> G t°e j • ,• V0 '61 06 '661 , too 1 t t►t"o st % • ES '� b /t 0% `f, s �• • ' 81V tP tot % ,• • 4 All /�• _ ' tip / /°' / , ' .!/ 3 November 23,2004 Consider approving a request for a zone change from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling)to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 270 E. Chapin I U7V2_0_-' City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item g m TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a zone change from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling)to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 270 E. Chapin. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of a zone change from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling)to GC-MD(General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling)District forproperty located at 270 E. Chapin. BACKGROUND W. V. Travis, the property owner, is requesting this zone change from RS to GC-MD for property located at 270 E. Chapin. The property consists of one lot occupied by a vacant house and a vacant lot. Mr. Travis states that the proposed use of the property will be the retail sale of new and used outboard motors and boats. The subject property is adjacent to GC-MD zoning to the north and east. The property to the north consists of the remains of a one-time commercial building. The property to the east is vacant. Mr. Travis owns the property to the east that fronts on Martin Luther King Parkway. BUDGETARYIMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Joint Public Hearing held November 15, 2004,the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve a zone change from RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) to GC-MD (General Commercial- Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 270 E. Chapin. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. FILE 1752-Z: Request for a zone change from RS (Residential Single Family NORTH Dwelling) to GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District or - more restrictive district. Location: 270 E. Chapin SCALE +� Applicant: William V. Travis V=200' w ` . j A 1 I C-5 I• . t L � . ^ H.Lena J. W. &W/OCx_ h • . • /_ , L ro VCH N /t ° • •CIGPIN ECT Mw� CHAPIN ST. W " - a Z h Q Nto, I ,. ` EA T- LNsI i sr - so EAST ALMA ST. -40 so Ate - _ _ h t. 3° i 10 st J !- to n I• I ' JH �/\j 1 4 November 23,2004 Consider approving a request for a specific use permit to allow a mother-in-law/guest quarters in an RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling)District for property located at 2498 Briarcliff City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a specific use permit to allow a mother-in-law/guest quarters in an RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District for property located at 2098 Briarcliff. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of a specific use permit to allow a mother-in-law/guest quarters in an RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District for property located at 2098 Briarcliff subject to the quarters not being used for rental purposes. BACKGROUND Barbara J.Ward,the owner,is requesting a specific use permit to allow the existing garage at the rear of 2098 Briarcliff to be converted into mother-in-law/guest quarters. Ms. Ward would like to convert the 624 sq. ft. detached garage into additional living space with a living room,kitchen area,bedroom and bath. Due to illness,Ms. Ward is unable to live alone. Her daughter and son-in-law live with her. In order to provide her with some privacy, the garage will be converted into living space for Ms. Ward. While a kitchen is shown, Ms. Ward states that there will be no cooking facilities. BUDGETARY IMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Joint Public Hearing held November 15,2004,the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve a specific use permit to allow a mother-in-law/guest quarters in an RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District for property located at 2098 Briarcliff subject to the quarters not being used for rental purposes. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. w h N ) '� N �, N C Iwo � .. L 'y m — FILE 1754-P: Request for a specific use permit to allow a mother-in-taw/guest NORTH r quarters in an RS (Residential Single Family Dwelling) District. • Location: 2098 Briarcliff - Applicant: Barbara J. Ward SCALE 1"=200' N /[[.72 N n K f Is nr 7! p /7161 r ♦ • )♦ • H 172 M ~ t • M • : Pa. a 1 ' J J R. 28 M • is�, �. ♦ M •, J /o �0 !so AU T/N )�E /ro s f►ti 'bh 0 / R AUSTIN AVE. R8 AV r N f • t ft N �� Q d9 ' AV N K v ,o it U • ' J N , U , L� • r ' �A Is Z ♦ N : � • f • 75 3 V nr ei Q • • p.19 ♦ M u o • ♦ t F ♦ . /�./ N * t V �^ • • R �" J « uce • • / ' �. t[s ee 3 � .. .� • R M `s t b ♦ •N �� j Ida /Lts AP ,Q ti S 00012 ' 26" W 75. 00" FDl3TiD t f B g��� 1 IRON ROD RW ty ROCK 459e i LOT > 1 �� I DRIT'E CARAGE a a _ON SLAB ^, I ^ �+J CONC. I J WALK � p�xaoD Fli'N ' r� I CHAIN LINK 'I A10D _n 1 'h ONS STORY `-' ^, J 71 9.7d ON BLOCKS �1 1 O AC Co C7 o c � tn.7a so.ae G� co FRONT •: 'PORCH I Or LOTS 12 wC. l 1 i . 99. 90' I 4 O r-+ U 112 FOUND f/2" POUND f/2" FOUND t 2" IRON ROD IRON ROD LAON ROD IRON RO NORTH 75. 33 ct (REFaX26NCb BSdRINCf O , Q 2098 B R CLIFF DR * MGAL.DESCRIPTION: ••°.�& • SURVEY kADE FOR SURVEY:OF THS NORTH f12 OF LOT, If AND ALL OF ��•�4 Bq BONNIE d 90YRIIJ LOT 12, ;IN LI BLOCK B OF BRRCLIFF ADDITION e P R 2098 BkIARCLIFF DRIVE, BEAUMONT TEXAS 77706 � ^•••••..•••••••••.«RU DATE: 7-16-01 �JI�J�V l51!OWc> V��W L1 U�IhL=.1 11 LSo �`�.•O � 1 S. f' - SO' I. PJC#AAD BRUCE, TEXAS R,P.L.S. NUMBER 908, �2Q'.tiEg��d•`� DO IIE EBY-CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS G•I• 2O0f58e7-C3! MADE bN THE GROUND UNDER MY SUPERVISION, FEXA FLOOD ZONE: c OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DnSCR£BED HEREON, S. gRUCS AND MAT THIS SURVEY 75 TRUE AND CORRECT 7MS bEGISTRA270N gB 908 PANEL NUMBER: TO TH7$' BEST OF MY KNO-WLEDCE AND BELIEF. 485457—a0ss B AND THAT THERE ARE NO DIECREPAXCIES; I CONFLrCTS, SHORTAGES IN BOUNFDARLKS, PANEL DATE: f2-4-84 ENCROACHMENTS, PROTRUSION LA S. OVERLAPPING I 5 November 23, 2004 Consider approving a request for a specific use permit to allow a cellular telephone transmission tower in a GC-MD(General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 4151-65 Gladys City of Beaumont CI Council A enda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request for a specific use permit to allow a cellular telephone transmission tower in a GC-MD (General Commercial- Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 4151-65 Gladys. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends denial of a specific use permit to allow a cellular telephone transmission tower in a GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 4151-65 Gladys. BACKGROUND LA Unwired,the applicant, is requesting a specific use permit to allow the construction of a cellular telephone transmission tower at 4151-65 Gladys. The facility would include a 150'tall monopole tower and related equipment all within a fenced enclosure. An 8' tall wood screening fence would be constructed around the facility. As required by ordinance, a 10' wide landscape strip would be planted along the south property line. Due to the recent proliferation of requests for cell towers, the City Council took steps to try to minimize the effects these towers might have on nearby property owners. Of most concern are the negative effects these towers might have on nearby residential areas. While this property and the neighboring properties to the east,west and north are zoned GC-MD, the general area is residential in nature. BUDGETARYIMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Joint Public Hearing held November 15, 2004,the Planning Commission voted 5:2 to approve a specific use permit to allow a cellular telephone transmission tower in a GC-MD District for property located at 4151-65 Gladys, subject to the following conditions: 1. The tower will be of stealth-type construction resembling a flag pole but without the flag. 2. An 8' tall wood screening fence and a 10'wide landscape strip with shrubs and trees 8' tall when planted will be required on all four sides. 3. The tower shall not be in excess of 130' tall 4. The facility will be constructed to allow for the co-location of other carriers. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, and the Public Works Director. The "20% Rule" Section 30-40. D. of the Zoning Ordinance states the following: Protest: The City Council shall not amend, supplement, change, modify or repeal any regulation, restriction or boundary or approve a Specific Use Permit where a protest against such change, signed by the owners of twenty (20) percent or more either of the area of the lots included in such proposed change or of the lots or land immediately adjoining the same and extending two hundred (200) feet therefrom, except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4) of all the members of the City Council. This means that in order to approve a zone change or specific use permit when the 20% rule has been invoked at least six Council members must vote in favor of the Ordinance. On File 1748-P, a protest of over 44%was received, therefore invoking the Rule on this case. IF J� FILE 1748-P: Request for a specific use permit to allow a cellular telephone NORTH transmission tower in a GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) µ-j District. Location: 4151-65 Gladys SCALE ,l;J Applicant: LA Unwired 1"=200' K. it It • 11 M - It !{ N 10 to t• � !1 N Im. J w.. i AM rri 6 T T M T 18 IT I • 'Y • 1 • t10 • s { s at s { N c 11{ $ e I! t ts It « • W • 0-23 = a Is II --- 1!{ + V tl N W W N t> O ID 5 9 T a• t IT t• 20 M f • J e j4 • ti • a • • i a< I GLAOYS t f l t• t AO J ( •/� <I •V f c r GLADYS AVE. ITT 4 N o A H tt t1 t If • Y N I N _ It • 11 \ ea 4 to ° 10 ° 16 • 21 JA r { • t • { Collins & Associates CELL TOWER DATA SITE p LAN GRO Cen lnr of lower Land Surve vor-s, In e, NAD 63 Coordinate, Lat. 30'05'35.3- North LOUISIANA UNWIRED, LLC T o.f P-,,. T.-- - SI REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Lang 94'08'47.0• Weal A LAND SURVEYORS Ground Elevation e 24 AMSI_ COMMUNICATION TOWER SITE Situated in PROPERTY Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, TEMPORARY BENCH MARK LOT L6 OF BLOCK 10 OF GILDER NLCBL4NDS A SOBD/v!SlON IN THE K Mississippi & Alabarna Top of Not In Power Pole Weal of D7UMS SURVEr,, ABSTRACT N0. 56, JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS Lease Area, ELEVATION - 25.26' AMSL Office: 537-439-5808 815 Mulberry St...t Fox: 337-4 39-3339 Westlake, LA 70669 3 Lo 15 F' o IJ LI D C�IK A,pndl , POINT OF BEGINNING FOR 35' b A,phdl o ACCESS R UTILITY EASEMENT a. I _ z 0.648 Aare.° ---- - _ t s Pdn1 of r.l.. 1 Wopa+.e liepo..d -t Requked Mood Ca Wmarcol D.I,.Gat. WI Col. I Fens.(e'High) �o as 17.50' o 'flkk o I )♦ 474 Center of Propo..d a 5• ,prop^•.°Pe'1'Ing Spue. IN 98.29.00" E 40.00' 150 Tell Monopole Tow.F c �? Propo,eo To-e. TOWER PROFILE t a' S.t 5/6 Iron rod w/c I aP Not to Scale TM..Ca[ondult a to ll_.I i S }--11.J�40 00'3 w.0o (~ � Propo..0 A,pholt ILI b'p I Ic.Bridg. Z:� y vrati cvo -LOT o 6 yiN y1� CALL BEFORE YOU ? r Moll Propo..d 10'06 0 u �'` DIG - DRILL - BLAST LA unwk.d o In fy} 1-800-245-4545 O d'8 Asondl OYM� P Equb.Foundolbn� hillig A.P i w 13 (TOLL FREE) .to.New Pow«P.I. ,-`.— a t + TEXAS ONE CALL SYSTEM. INC. a - lit,in,Wood F.M.(t1•Higr•) Re9.k.Mood - 1 Qo F.M.(8'High) ! THE UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS IS NOT IMPLIED NOR 40.00' `I1.4 INTENDED TO DE THE COMPLETE INVENTORY OF UTILITIES IN_TQ N 1 29'00 E 97.94'S M) �, `-South line of THIS AREA. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBIU7Y TO VERIFY 100.00(R) _s Parent tract THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES(WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT) Prwo,ed POINT OF BEGINNING FOR Requk.d 10'lond.c AND PROTECT SAID UTILITIES FROM ANY DAMAGE. 1Oe 0"d" LA UNWIRED LEASE AREA ape Bu Her O.D37 Acmi / 1,600 Sq. Ff. Ed,ting wood Fence P.opoaed a'Hiyn., praoo.ea Ln un.,ee Sel 5/E-Iran o�with cap Wood Fence / Equipment on 10'.I fi Convele Slat, E Ialing CTaln link F.ncs L E G E N D COMPOUND DETAIL • Iron,fapad�place ------ -__ _. SCALE: 1' = 20' O 5/8 rod,./cap xt n dace P, o,ed Foun nal n•, Emrn+w,t or right of w.y r e,. L-)�.,,pn,ee F«,ndal�an In Deed sr r—d Inn • rn-• �- Wer;or and vd*x t lot Ines G.ountl Elewllon 2a'AMSI SURVEYOR'S NOTES: -0-P P.-pan 1 —E O»rheod elecvic Inn ) Elewliona shown hereon ore based on top Range of �••• fire{"^' hydrant of NW Ouadront of Clad B Lutes, —X— Fmrn 1+n1�1�..(, I dealgnatad oa "BM 1024- by the City of Beaumont, Cenledne . .1.. DITCH AS REOUIREO- �� having an elevation of 26.59' AMSL Unknown Datum R01V Right of Wry ( ) IBM e pa a y BmU ua y 2) Site runoff will drain to the roodside ditch of Gladys AMSL Abo»Peon Sea Leal Avenue. .• AGL Aba»G—d Le»I _III__- I_�\ JJ) All vehicular maneuver will lake place within the (M) uea,ored III III ` - eaae Are., (R) R—d I—III l 111 Wr9 -Collins. P.L.S. TX 5032 1I_I III [==I I frL. PEO. rdrpnane peeeald -.__.-.___..:-- THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS FAA CLASS 2C ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS. RENSEO: 10-21-2004-ADDED ZONING INFORMATION © Goth R rvt Fitt, DATE: SCALE: PAGE: NOTES: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: JOB NO.: PLAT NO.: rHls suRVEY SueSTANnAUr coMPUCS MIH 1HE cuRRERr COMPOUND f,Ol'�'� 07-27-2004 VARIES 3 OF 3 File TExAS SOOE Y OF PROFEg90NA A R�EYORS SIANDAROS RKF VTC 204317 204317-15 ANO sPEaElcnnaNS FOR A cAlECORr IB crXVDInoN R SURVEY 5('ALF * Approval subject to the following conditions: I. Flic toAcr will be of stealth-type construction resembling a flag pole but without the flag, 2. An 8' tall wood screening fence and a 10' wide landscape strip with shrubs and trees 8' tall when planted will be required on all four sides. �. The tower shall not be in excess of 130'tall 4 Flic facility will be constructed to allow for the co-location of other carriers. 6 November 23,2004 Consider approving a request to abandon the west 10'of a 20'wide utility easement being the east 20'of Lots 26 and 27, Block 15, Calder Place Addition at 580 and 590 24P Street 11 ..7LJ17J City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Stephen C. Richardson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider a request to abandon the west 10' of a 20' wide utility easement being the east 20'of Lots 26 and 27,Block 15,Calder Place Addition at 580 and 590 24' Street. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approval of the request to abandon the west 10'of a 20'wide utility easement being the east 20' of Lots 26 and 27,Block 15, Calder Place Addition at 580 and 590 24`h Street. BACKGROUND The City of Beaumont has a 20' wide utility easement which is the east 20' of Lots 26 and 27, Block 15, Calder Place Addition. The easement was created to accommodate a sewer line and an underground septic tank. The septic tank was abandoned and the City now maintains a 6" sanitary sewer line which is located in the east 10'of the 20'wide easement. This request concerns the west 10' of the easement. This item was sent to all interested parties and no objections were received. BUDGETARYIMPACT None. PREVIOUS ACTION At a Regular Meeting held November 15,2004,the Planning Commission voted 7:0 to approve the request to abandon the west 10' of a 20' wide utility easement being the east 20' of Lots 26 and 27, Block 15, Calder Place Addition at 580 and 590 24`h Street. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY Planning Commission, City Manager, Public Works Director and the Planning Manager. Q n a w / a AP go NARRISOV p s — _ FILE 673-OB: Request to abandon the west 10' of a 20' wide utility easement being NORTH the east 20' of Lots 26 and 27,Block 15, Calder Place Addition. -4- Location: 580 and 590 24`b Street Applicant: Ronnie Pullin, Real Property Coordinator, City of Beaumont for Mr. and f Mrs. J. F. Delage, Jr. SCALE = 1"=200' t Ar Y i N ! / M!!1 ! N Ii2 A! • f t JO • . 14 At 0 AV "L- - so 10M so - t Yr.v _ J 11 u Y Y r o _ern - . ,y � . N •' • s / • all Q Sr Ar G9G'ra�" • $ n �e. .v h t In WTI- As ♦ VVV Z61 W a 14 Sd so s ;n 1225 . _ • wt . . lJ Q ipie �. • r v , . a n ,r r• e If 6lzj AW i o n $ otrs y' e a �� c 00 73 50 AV is J0 ti d b b t • Y b s0 N.s13 a/ n 60 MPS th x k1 r � - K '� n d / a ra s • r �. • sos ng A65 S3 •r °r so so 5 9 PHELAN BLVD. a 0 7 November 23, 2004 Consider approving a contract between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont Community Housing Development Organization(BCHDO) ....., City of Beaumont Im Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager r PREPARED BY: Janett Lewis, Housing Manager .l. MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 17, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider approving a contract between the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont Community Housing Development Organization (BCHDO). RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the Beaumont Community Housing Development Organization (BCHDO) in the amount of $101,982 for down payment/closing cost assistance, developer's fee and costs for new housing construction at 2895 Wilson Street. BACKGROUND City Council Resolution #01-253 authorized a contract with the Southeast Texas Community Development Corporation,Inc. ("SETCDC")for costs associated with new housing construction at 2895 Wilson Street. SETCDC wishes to have BCHDO complete construction of the home and close the property with an eligible home buyer. BUDGETARYIMPACT Funding is available from the 1999 HOME Program($28,500)and 2003 ($73,482)HOME Program. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Public Works Director, Planning Manager and Housing Manager. Attachment Beaumont Community Housing Development Organization New Housing Construction at 2895 Wilson Street Outstanding Dev. Costs Invoices - to Complete Developer's Down Payment/ Dev. Costs Construction Fee Closing Cost Asst Total $23,917 $47,565 $5,000 $25,500 $101,982 Note: Down payment/closing cost assistance($23,500) and the developer's fee($5,000) were previously funded from the 1999 HOME Program. Since the house was not completed, these funds were not expended and will be reprogrammed to BCHDO to provide this assistance to the homebuyer. Southeast Texas Community Development Corporation, Inc. ("SETCDC") Outstanding Invoices 2895 Wilson Vendor Total Ritter Lumber $16,761.93 P O Box 1265 Nederland 77627 727-0231 Quality Concrete & Materials 2,940.00 P O Box 20257 77720 842-2100 Acme Brick 2,603.35 Beaty Overhead Door 769.50 P O Box 56, Port Neches 77651 722-5468 C. Johnnie on the Spot 216.80 Fitz &Shipman Star Concrete 625.00 Total $23,916.58 11/17/2004 11:25 4098603731 HARDY PAGE 01 EEAUMONT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION, INC. 5220 Highland Avenue Beaumont, Texas 77705 (409) 813-2158 MEMORANDUM lapr To: Jranett Lewis From. Antoinette Hardy Tate:November 17,2004 Re: 2895 Wilson This memo is written to inform you that the cost to complete the home at 2895 Wilson is$47,565.00. Tim estimated $26,000 Was items confirmed by contractors,the hand written were additional not yet entered. I apologize for the mistake. The complete package cost needed is as follow: Construction Cost $47,555.00 Down Payment Assist 20,000.00 Closing cost Assist 3,000.00 BCHDO Closing Cost 2,500.00 Developer's Fee 5.000.00 TOTAL. $7811065.00 If you have any questions,please give me a call at(409) 813-2158 or 201-0272. 8 November 23, 2004 Consider approving the purchase of a tractor for use in the Parks Division City of Beaumont e Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Kirby Richard, Internal Services Director MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council consider award of a bid for the purchase of one tractor with articulated boom mower. RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends the award of a bid to Oil City Tractors,Inc. of Beaumont in the amount of$57,990 for the purchase of one (1) two wheel drive tractor with an articulated boom mower attachment for the Parks and Property Services Division. BACKGROUND Four(4)companies submitted bids for furnishing one(1)diesel driven two wheel drive tractor with an articulated boom mower attachment. The 80 HP tractor will be used by the Parks and Property Services Division to mow ditches and canal banks throughout the City. The articulated boom mower with a 23 ft. reach is capable of mowing along steep canal banks and ditches. Currently, the Parks and Property Services Division maintains approximately 336 acres of outfall ditches. The ditches are maintained monthly by a crew of three(3)Parks Division employees. The companies submitting bids meeting specifications are as follow: Vendor Price Delivery Oil City Tractors, Inc. $57,990 90-120 days Brookside Equipment Sales $58,980 90-120 days Trinity Valley Tractors $68,849 60-180 days Purchase of Tractor November 16, 2004 Page 2 Hlavinka Equipment Company of Nome, Texas and Brookside Equipment Sales of Houston, also provided bids for alternate tractors and mowers that did not meet specifications. This tractor will replace unit 4243, a 1988 Ford tractor equipped with an extended mower. Warranty service will be provided by Oil City Tractors,Inc. The tractor is warranted for twenty-four (24)months and a twelve(12)month warranty is provided for the mower. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds are available in the Capital Reserve Fund for this expenditure. PREVIOUS ACTION None. SUBSEQUENT ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager and Internal Services Director. 9 November 23, 2004 Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Bunn's Bluff Canal -- Levee Improvement Project amount for"extra work" City of Beaumont Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Hani J. Tohme, Water Utilities Interim Manager MEETING DATE: November 23, 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 9, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to increase the Bunn's Bluff Canal -- Levee Improvement Project amount for "extra work." RECOMMENDATION Administration recommends approval of a contract change with Brystar Contracting, Inc. by increasing the contract amount by $506,742 to perform "extra work" needed to dredge the main water intake from the Neches River at Bunn's Bluff and to dredge the water hyacinth from cells 6, 7 and 8 at the Wetlands. The contractor will furnish all supervision, labor, equipment,material and necessary insurance to complete the Scope of Work. BACKGROUND The existing intake at Bunn's Bluff that supplies the City with its surface water was built in 1915 and requires dredging approximately every 30 years. The silt and sand built up at the intake effects the quantity and quality of water taken from the Neches River and must be dredged. The water hyacinth at the Wetlands has bloomed in large quantities this summer covering 70 percent of cells 6, 7 and 8. Their removal is essential for meeting the ammonia discharge requirements during the winter months mandated by the State. BUDGETARY IMPACT Funds for the project are available in the Capital Improvements Fund. PREVIOUS ACTION None SUBSEQUENT ACTION None RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Public Works Director, and Water Utilities Manager. WUBunnB1uffC0ELucas.wpd November 10,2004 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE Change Order No. 1 Date:November 10,2004 I Project: City of Beaumont Bunn's Bluff Canal Levee Improvement Project Owner: City of Beaumont P.O.Box 3827 Beaumont,Texas 77704 Contractor: Brystar Contracting,Inc. 8385 Chemical Road Beaumont,Texas 77705 To the Owner: Approval of the following contract change is requested. Reason for Change: To increase the contract amount for"extra work"performed by the Contractor for installing and removing 3500 L.F.of discharge piping to eight(8)acre impound area owned by Brystar to be used to dredge 40 feet on each side of the 5'x 5'Box Culvert Intake at the Neches River,at a 2:1 slope from a depth of-6.70'down to-20.00'out into main river channel. The width at the main river channel will be 200'. Pump dredged material to impound area; remove existing silt and sand by bucket dredging from inside existing City of Beaumont canal to elevation-6.90'. This work is to be accomplished in 45 days. To dredge Water Hyacinth at the Wetlands from cells 6,7 and 8 and deposit it in cell 5 and pump water back into the cells. This work is to be completed in 60 days. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $2.039.667.00 THIS CHANGE ORDER: The work includes but is not limited to: Description • Mobilization&Demobilization • Install and remove 3500 L.F.of discharge piping to eight(8)acre impound owned by Brystar. • Dredge 40ft on each side of the 5'x 5'Box Culvert Intakes at a 2:1 slope from a depth of-6.70'down to-20.00'out into main river channel. The width at the main river channel will be a 200'dredge using 10'hydraulic dredge with basket cutter. • Pump dredged material to impound area. • Remove existing silt and sand by bucket dredging Bunn's Bluff Canal from STA. 146+00 to 143+00 to elevation-6.90'. + $ 120.302.00 • Dredge water hyacinth at Wetlands from cells 6,7,8 then pump water back into the cells. + $ 386.440.00 TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 506.742.00 TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER: $2.546.409.00 CONDITION OF CHANGE: "Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the adjustments in contract price and contract time stipulated in this Change Order represents full compensation for all increases and decreases in the cost of,and the time required to perform the entire work under Contract arising directly or indirectly from this Change Order and all previous Change,Orders. Acceptance of this waver constitutes an agreement between Owner and Contractor that the Change Order represents an all inclusive,mutually agreed upon adjustment to the Contract,and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed." Recommended By: Approved By: Accepted By: 4L�n,Sg e ' � Hani J.Tohme,P.E. City of Beaumont Brystar Contracting,Inc. Water Utilities Interim Manager Owner Contractor Date: Date: Date: o o¢ 10 November 23,2004 Consider amending Ordinance No. 04-079 relating to the structure located at 1955 Delaware City of Beaumont ~ Council Agenda Item TO: City Council FROM: Kyle Hayes, City Manager PREPARED BY: Pam Loiacano, Field Supervisor MEETING DATE: November 23 2004 AGENDA MEMO DATE: November 16, 2004 REQUESTED ACTION: Consider an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 04-079 relating to the structure located at 1955 Delaware. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends denial of the request to amend the condemnation order for the structure located at 1955 Delaware. BACKGROUND Councilmember Samuel requests that the condemnation order for the structure located at 1955 Delaware be reconsidered by Council to allow the property owner, Keith Dixon, to rehabilitate it. This structure was brought before City Council on September 28,2004 with staffs recommendation of a raze order. The owner was enrolled in a work program in September 2003 and received two extensions. All certified letters were mailed to Mr. Dixon's correct mailing address and all letters were returned unclaimed. BUDGETARY IMPACT City may incur the cost of demolition if the structure is not rehabilitated. PREVIOUS ACTION The Administration recommended and Council approved a raze order for this structure on September 28, 2004. SUBSEQUENT ACTION If Council grants a time period for rehabilitation, staff will enroll Mr. Dixon in a work program and monitor the progress of work. If the structure is not brought up to code or substantial progress is not made within the specified time period, the structure will be demolished without any further notification to property owner or Council action. RECOMMENDED BY City Manager, Public Works Director and Building Official. SUBSTANDARD BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT CLEAN COMMUNITY CITY OF BEAUMONT DATE REQUESTED November , 2004 WARD 3 ADDRESS OF INSPECTION 1955 Delaware ACCOUNT NO. 23250-6100-6 CENSUS TRACT 9 OWNER Keith Dixon ET UX ADDRESS 9620 Gross CITY/STATE (07)-1049 LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPRAISAL VALUE Lot or Plat Lot 5 Land Value 2450 Block or Tract Block 3 Improvement Value 19520 Addition/Survey Gold Hill Total Value 21970 A. Fifty (50) percent deterioration of non-supporting members? YES X NO B. Thirty-three (33) percent deterioration of supporting members? YES X NO C. Fire damaged? YES NO X D. Enrolled in W©rk Repaid Program? YES NO (09-30-03 thrt�X130-{LEI E. Initial Inspection Date August 27, 2003 Extended until()3 23-04 Extended unfit t16-3004 MAJOR CODE VIOLATIONS: The roof on this structure is deteriorated and new shingles will be needed. There is a deep layer of pine straw covering the roof which is causing more deterioration. The rafters and fascia boards are rotted and will need to be replaced. There is water damage to the rear interior due to the leaking roof. The rear section has extensive deterioration. All damaged or rotten windows and window sills will need to be repaired. There is extensive termite damage in the rear. The exterior siding is rotten and missing. There has been an attempt made on the foundation repair but none is complete. There is still some deterioration to a sill. All permits are expired. All damaged flooring, ceilings and walls will need to be replaced. No interior work has been done. All damaged electrical wiring and electrical fixtures will need to be replaced. New outside service will be needed. Also all damaged plumbing and plumbing fixtures will need to be replaced. The structure is secure at the present and the interior inspection was viewed through the windows This structure appeared before City Council on September 28,2004 and was issued a raze order. Mr. Dixon still wants to rehabilitate this structure; therefore, it is being brought back before Council for reconsideration. SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS �t c 'T e4al Af gg gi i het °�: # } x �}�• �� JF #. ? ok # s .. t ' m x _ a F� �x v fi. a i t t x� w r ,.y 4 4 y w v 4,. a x 3 u; x- A 1955 DELAWARE r , .r"."..�. .. # 'y*gara v4 � z } r ! •y pya sik w. _ I : dd y r r ,�-.. �q�s,a � ;�.a���MM ?gyp '�� ����� I �",,w, , •���k.'� �r� n 4 T9 C s lig4 �u F .r _ M A MV y — 7 2 y } lzo . �" 'mW1wCa^.wi•«, t d«YG.`i��. �,'.F�v"�.,°.�.2;.. ,tk � IE k ' f°} Kr " adylpw.. ".per f F ��h a r t� 4 y � s 1955 DELAWARE