Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 85-382 R E S O L U T I O N BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT: THAT the revised Capital Improvements Program attached hereto be, and the same is hereby, approved and adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager be, and he is hereby, directed to examine options for reprogramming funds for street improvements in order to accelerate the completion of high-priority projects. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Beaumont this the day of �i �� 19 8 5. - Mayor - SU f-MARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The Capital Improvements Program is a strategic planning- tool used to promote maximum efficiency in the allocation of the limited funds available for public improvements. Because of the perpetual scarcity of capital project funds, it is essential that the projects included in the CAP must be evaluated in terms of their impact on the City's long-term and short-term finances, their consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, their overall benefit to the public, and their relationship to other public and private sector improvements. The City staff and Planning Commission have prepared a 5-year program of prioritized public improvements based upon priorities, available funding sources, and the Comprehensive Plan. The total estimated cost of the proposals over a five-year period is $63,353,080. Table 6 provides a cost summary of the preliminary CIP project proposals by year and functional classi- fication. As shown by Table 5, as additional $21,020,773 in previous budget year authorizations will also be used to imple- ment the CIP. Table 7 shows tentative funding sources for the $63 million + in proposed projects. Approximately $4 million in State and Federal grants, $22 million in Water Revenue funds and $24 million from previously approved bond issues make up the bulk of the preliminary funding package. Approximately 1.6 million in General Fund Revenues, over $600 thousand in Federal General Revenue Sharing, and $10.8 million in other funds would be required to finance the remainder of the proposals. The CIP projects, their priority ratings, functional classifications, implementation schedules, and proposed funding sources are shown in Tables 8 and 9. Table 8 lists projects by function. Table 9 lists projects sorted by funding sources. Each table provides the following information: ID #. Each proposal has been assigned a code number for identification and computerization purposes. FUNCTION. Projects have been grouped into 15 functional categories: Library, Health, Water and Sewer, Parks, Fire Protection, Airport, Drainage, Street Lighting and Traffic Signals, Streets, Transit System, Community Facilities, Municipal Court, and Landfill. PRIORITY. Projects were ranked by the initiating department using a four-level scale and by the Planning Commission using a system of 10 adopt°d criteria. The departmental priority ratings are shown under the column heading "DPRI.'. The Plan- ning Commissioner's ratings are shown under the column heading "PCPRI." COST (BY YEAR)_ Estimated project costs are shown by fiscal year. A five-year total is also indicated. SOURCE OF FUNDS. Proposed funding sources are indicated by the following symbols: GR/GRS The City's General Fund or Federal General Revenue Sharing GRANT Federal or State grants other than Revenue Sharing RB(W) Water Revenue Bonds CDP Drainage Bond Issue approveu by voters i in 1983 (Comprehensive Drainage Program) ` TIP Transportation Improvements Program Bond issue approved by voters in 1980 � RB(I) "Internal" Revenue Bonds secured by Homberg Golf Course revenues I GOB Other general obligation bonds not included in above bond issues DON Private donations (most of these would be through the Park and Recreation Committee's fundraising drive. ) OF User Fees LS Land Sale LEASE Mineral lease on City property. Figures I through 8 show the general geographic location of each proposal (with the exceptions of proposals not associated with a fixed location, such as motor vehicles, or projects which apply to numerous locations throughout the city) . TABLE 6 C.I.P. BY FUNCTION FUNCTION PRIOR YEAR 50DR TOTAL 85/86 86187 87/88 11/89 89190 - ---------------------------- ------------- LIBRARY $174500.00 #1 - 500.04 $6000.00 $106000.00 -- HEALTH $217000.00 $100000.00 4100000,00 WATER AND SEWER $22173080.00 $1150000.00 $3255130.00 3$797030.00 $4220920.00 $4753000.00 FIRE $260000.00 480000.00 $75000.00 $75000.00 $75000.00 $571400.00 PARKS $707720.00 35104500.00 $112500.00 32136000.00 $866000.00 41160000.00 3810000.00 AIRPORT $3 6000.00 $4000.00 $4000.00 TRANSIT (�[ $13000.00 $13000.00 DRAINAGE S'�3�0000,00 $14878900.00 $3377000.00 $2148000.00 $9152000.00 $105000.00 $55900.00 STREETS $12957770.00 $19333100.00 $1037100.00 0076700,00 $4840500.00 $405700.00 $4569100,00 LIGHTINg/SIGNALS $120000.00 $30000.00 130000.00 360000.00 COMUNITY FACILITIES 3199253.00 $325000.00 $250000.00 $75000.00 9UNICIPAL COURT $374000.00 $374000.00 LANDFILL $42 000.00 --------------------------------------------- -------------- -------------------------------------------- TOTALS $21020773,00 $63353080,00 36131100.00 415656830.00 $23561530,00 $6523620.00 $11020000.00 i TABLE C.I.P. BY FUNDING SOURCE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR YEAR 5-YEAR TOTAL 85/86 86187 87/88 88/0-9 89/90 ------------ -------------- GE;�ERAL REVENUE/ 3264283.00 34433800,00 3616100,00 - - ------ REVENUE SHARING 5305000,00--- 364JOD,OG 1670000.00 REVENUE BONDS (WATER $22173080.00 $1150000.00 $3255130.00 $8797030.00 $4220420.00 FUND) $4750040,00 COMPREHENSIVE $2390000.00 $14772000.00 $3377000.00 $2148000.00 $9142000.00 $105000.00 DRAINAGE PROGRAM GRANTS $323000.00 $3895000.00 $200000.00 $2070000.00 $260000.00 $555000.00 $810000.00 TRANSPORTATION $12532770.00 $9350200.00 $688000.00 $5186700.00 $3475500.00 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DONATIONS $1235000.00 $64000.00 $550000.00 $645000.00 GENERAL OBLIGATION 54708000.40 $9345000.00 $2890000.00 $1365000.00 $300000.00 $4196000,04 PONDS USER FEES $260000.00 $300000.00 $75000.00 $75040.00 $75000.00 $75000.00 INTERNAL REVENUE $637720.00 BONDS LEASE INCOME $49000.04 325400.00 $12000.00 $12000.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTALS $21020773.00 $63353080.00 $6131100.00 $15696830.00 $23981530.00 $6523620.00 $11020000400 TABLE 8 PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : Library CIP 86-90 ID# PROJECT NAME ------------PRIOR-YRS- 5 YR TOTAL FY 85186 FY 86187 FY 87189 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCPRI DPRI _-_____--____________________-__--- 1 TYRRELL LIBRARY RESTORATION 0 100000 0 0 100000 0 0 GR/RS 11 Al 1,1 LEASE FUND FOR TYRRELL LIBRARY ---0--- 24500 12500 6000 6000 0 0 LEASE 11 Al FIELD TOTALS-------------------------------- ____----__ 0 124500 12500 6000 106000 0 0 IN Table: 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : Health CIP 86-90 ----------------------- ID# PROJECT NAME -PRIOR-YRS--S YR-TOTAL FY 85/B6 FY 86187 FY 87188 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCPRI DPRI r 9 PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER PHASE 4 217000 100000 100000 0 0 0 15 B4 FIELD TOTALS----------------------------------------------------------- 0 ----- 217000 100004 100000 0 0 0 0 Table 8 (continued) , PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : Water & Sewer. CIP 86-90 ID# PROJECT NAME r--------------FRIOR---- 5 YR TOTAL -- 85-86 FY 86187 FY 87/88 FY 88/89 FY 89190 FUNDS PCPRI DFRI 11 WEST ELEVATED WATER TANK 0 - --------- igloo 0 18180 p 0 0 RB(W) 5 B1 12 23RD STR. 12 INCH WATER 0 164900 0 164900 0 13 SHAKESPEARE 12 INCH WATER LINE 0 24500 0 24500 0 0 0 RD(W) 9 B2 14 GLADYS 12 INCH WATER LINE 0 60100 0 60100 p 0 RD(W) 15 11TH ST. 60 INCH SANITRY SWR 0 1487750 0 1487750 p 0 0 RD(W) 16 MAJOR DRIVE ELEVATED TANK 0 0 RB(W) Al 18 EAST-WEST 24' TRAN5,LINE 5EC.1 4 `8`9000 0 282900 2546100 0 0 RB(W) 11 Al 19 5.0 MGD WELL AT LOEB FIELD 1373900 0 136390 1227510 0 0 RB( ) 14 B1 0 W 1517850 0 147850 1430000 0 0 RD(W) 10 81 20 EAST-WEST 24'TRAPI5,LINE 5EC2 0 2416800 .0 241680 2175124 0 11 B1 21 KEITH RD 12" WATER LOOP SEC.1 0 408800 p 0 RD(W) 11 g2 22 KEITH RD. 12' WATER LOOP SEC.2 0 578800 0 40880 3679_0 �0 0 RB(W) 13 B3 23 UTILITY LINE EXTEN.&RPLMT, X1880 5_09_0 0 RB(W) 300 EAST LUCAS 21' INTERCEPTOR 0 0 2667500 3300000 0 650000 750000 900000 1040000 RB(W) 17 g1 301 11TH ST,36 INCH INTERCEPTOR 0 4125000 0 4 24`500 2425000 0 RD(W) 12 A-1 302 WASHINGTON BLVD 0 450000 454000 0 0 375004 3750000 RD(W) 12 A-1 303 COLLEGE ST 0 700000 700000 0 0 RD(W) 9 A-1 FIELD TOTALS-------------------------------------------------- 0 4 RB(W) 9 A-1 ---- ------------------------------------------- 0 22173080 1150000 3255130 8197030 4220920 4750000 - Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : Fire M CIP 86-90 ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86187 FY 87188 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCFRI DFRI 40 #14 FIRE STATION 0 503000 0 0 0 503000 0 GR/RS 15 Al 40.1 # 14 FIRE STATION 0 37000 37000 0 47 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY 260000 263000 38000 75000 75000 75000 0 OF g5 �S FIELDTOTALS-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 260000 803000 75000 75000 75000 578000 0 N 2 i Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : Parks ---------- CIF 86-90 ID# PROJECT NAME -----PRIOR_YRS__5-YR-TOTAL ---FY_85/86- FY 86187 FY 87108 FY 88/89 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCPRI DPRI -------- ------------------------•-------------- 24 HOMBERG GOLF COURSE 63770 0 0 0 RD(I) 38 NEW PARK :HEBERT HIGH AREA 0 675000 0 200000 100000 0 375000 GRANT 18 C 38.1 MATCHING FOR #38 HEBERT AREA 0 675000 0 200000 100000 0 375000 GRANT 18 C r 157 CALDWOOD PARK REHAB 0 50000 158 PIPKIN PARK REHAB 0 50000 0 50000 5000 0 0 GRANT 15 B 162 RIVERFRONT PARK PHASE 2 0 1500000 0 1500000 0 0 0 GRANT 11 C 166 NEW PARK;FLORIDA/HIGHLAND AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 60000 0 GRANT 167 NEW PARK 4TH/11TH/WASH/COLL 0 60000 0 60000 0 17 B 167.1 MATCH FOR#167 4/11/WASH/CULL 0 60000 0 60000 0 0 0 GRANT 17 B 168 NEW PARK.AMELIA 0 60000 0 0 GRANT 168.1 MATCH FOR #168 AMELIA PARK 0 60000 0 0 6000 0 GRANT 17 B 169 NEW PARK;WILLOW CREEK AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 0 DON 17 B 6000 170 NEW PARK;DELAWARE PLACE AREA 0 60000 0 60000 0 0 0 DON 26 C 171 NEW PARK'WINDEMERE AREA 0 0 DON 15 C 171.1 MATCH FOR#171 WINDEMERE AREA 0 60000 0 0 60000 60044 0 GRANT 16 C 172 NEW PARK:105/MAJOR/KEITH/LNVA 0 60000 0 0 DON 16 C 172.1 MATCH FOR #172 105/MAJOR 0 60000 0 0 60000 60000 0 GRANT 16 C J 173 NEW PARKIPARK MEADOWS AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 0 0 DON 16 C 113.1 MATCH FOR #1731 PARK MEADOWS 0 60000 0 0 60000 0 60000 GRANT 16 C 174 COLLIERS FERRY PARK 0 00 375000 0 GRANT 17 D 174.1 MATCH FOR #174 COLLIERS FERRY 0 375000 0 375000 0 DON 17 177 TYRRELL PARK IMPRROVEMENTS 0 500000 0 0 DON 13 D 177.1 LEASE FUND FOR TYRRELL PARK 0 2 25 0 250000 254400 211 BEST YEARS CENTER 400 1. 00 6000 6000 0 0 LEASE 13 FIELD TOTALS------__.____________ 10000- 100000 100000 0 0 GRANT 12 707720 5104500 112500 2136000 866000 1180000 810000 Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION .: Airport x h• i� CIF 86-90 ------------------------------------ -------------------------- ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87189 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS F'RI DFRI q1` ---------------------------------------------------PCP RI UPDATE MASTER FLAN 36000 50,1 MATCHING FOR AIRPORT HSTR,FLAN 0 4000 4000 0 0 0 0 GRANT ------------ 8 Al FIELD TOTALS----------------------------------------------- 0 0 GR/RS 9 Al -------------------------a-----------4----------------------------------------------------- 36000 4000 4000 0 0 0 0 ry Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION :Tr 2nsit --------------- CIP 86-90 ------------- ------------- -- ----------- ---------------- ---------- ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 FY 88/89 - --------------------- FY 89/90 --------------------- FUNDS ----------"-''-'-- FCFRI DPRI "r ----------------- 311-1 MATCHING FOR TRANSIT FCLTY IMP - "-"""-'�' FIELD TOTALS--------------- -------a_ 13000 13000 p --------------------- 0 13000 13000 Q Q a h}d {Y v A Table 8 (continued) -' PROJECTS BY FUNCTION rainage • GIF 86-40 ----------------------- ------------------------- ---- ----- D# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 8718 - --- ------------------ FY 88-89 FY 89/90 FUNDS ----- ---- 62 MINGLENOOD 440000 3450000 345000 0 63 WOODLANDS DRAINAGE 0 0 0 CDP 65 STREET CROSSING (DDb) 0 0 CDP 15 Al 66 BROADWAY BOX 200000 465000 0 160000 200000 105000 0 CDP 16 Al 67 COLLEGE-GOLIAD PROJECT 198000 0 0 Clip i` B1 68 COLLEGE / BMASH 90000 0 0 0 0 4 14 B.. 229500 0 CDP 70 23RD ST DITCH NORTH 220000 0 0 0 0 0 0 CDP ib B3 71 23RD ST DITCH SOUTH 0 '00000 0 2 0 0 0 0 CDP i4 B4 72 SPECIAL DRAINAGE PROJECTS 00000 15 B6 73 IRVING STREET FH 11 DRAINAGE 0 1063000 1063000 0 54000 0 56900 GR/RS 12 A6 74 5TH STREET DRAINAGE 0 98000 98000 0 0 0 0 CDP 15 B9 75 IH 10/11TH-GAYLN ST.ELIZABETH 225000 463000 463000 0 0 CDP 15 B10 0 76 SOUTH PARK DRAINAGE 0 1408000 1408000 0 0 0 CDP 16 B11 77 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IIIA DRAINAGE 0 1600000 0 240000 1360000 0 0 CDP 16 B12 78 FANNIN STREET BOX 0 1900000 0 275000 1625000 0 0 CDP 15 B12 79 CALDWOOD DRAINAGE 0 350000 0 20000 33 0 0 CDP 12 013 80 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IIIB DRAINAGE 0 1800000 0 0 1500 00 0 0 CDP 15 81 HIGH SCHOOL DITCH PHASE I 0 1..4000 1500000 0 0 CDP 15 B15 82 FAONETT ROAD PHASE II 0 760000. 0 113000 647000 0 0 CDP 15 B16 83 MOORE/UNIVERSITY DRAINAGE 0 600000 0 600000 0 0 0 CDP 15 B17 84 HIGH SCHOOL DITCH PHASE II 0 500000 0 0 500000 0 0 CDF` i5 B1B 85 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IV 0 CDP 15 B19 92 DRAINAGE RESERVE 0 1400000 0 100400 1300000 0 0 CDP 15 B20 317 GULF TERRACE OUTFALL DITCH 12 51500 0 0 0 0 CDP 12 318 PARK NORTH DITCH 0 220000 0 220000 0 CDP A4 420 PRINCE ST. PH, III 0 100000 0 100000 . 0 0 19 A-8 FIELD TOTALS------------—_ --600000- 0 0 0 0 CDP ib C2 ------------- -----------Q----------------------- ----------------------------------------------- -------------- 1 2390000 14878900 3377000 2148000 9192000 105000 56900 4 10 Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : Streets CIF 86-90 ----------------- ----- ID# PROJECT NAME -------- - '-'"'"-"'"-------- � PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87188 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS fCFRI DFRI 99 LIBERTY-LAUREL I 1300000 0 0 100 COLLEGE STREET 3334000 3000A 0 0 0 0 TIP 14 B1 0 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE 1230000 0 30000 0 0 0 TIP 16 0 0 0 TIP 16 B2 102 SPUR 380 RIGHT OF WAY (MLK) 300000 0 0 0 0 0 103 MAJOR DRIVE 760000 1608000 238000 1370000 0 0 0 TIP 14 B5 104 GLADYS STREET 950000 0 0 TIP 14 85 105 CONCORD ROAD PHASE I 847700 3536700 7 0 0 0 TIP 12 D6 0 .,536700 0 106 SIDEWALKS 425000 600000 0 300000 0 0 0 TIP 11 B7 110 SIREET/DRAINAGE PARTICIPATION 1365470 0 0 300000 0 COB 13 PS 111 LIBERTY - LAUREL FH.II 400000 0 0 0 0 TIP 13 B12 113 LUCAS 210000 2999500 0 0 114 COUCORD II 340000 726000 0 2500000 749500 0 0 TIP 10 B15 116 FOLSOMICROW TO DOWLEN 0 1365000 0, 726000 0 TIP 1 2 816 117 WASHINGTON BLVD 190000 450000 450000 0 13b5000 0 0 GOB 12 B18 118 T.I.P. RESERVE 304800 0 0 0 TIP 13 B-19 4 119 HELBIG ROAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIP 124 WALDEN ROAD 0 2590000/ 0 259000© 0 B70 0 0 GOB 8 B-184 ' 215 SIREET 1MPROVEMENTS (MISC. ) 0 4790000 0 0 4790000 GOB 11 C-6 FIELD TOTALS------------------- ------ 637900 349100 0 0 109740 ----''""-- 179100 GR/RS 14 B9 -------------------------------------- 12957770 19333100 1037100 8076700 4840500 409700 4969100 {1 Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCoTION : Lilahting/Siglials �a �p a CIF 86-90 ------------------------- ------------------------------------ ID# PROJECT NAME "--"' PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86187 FY 87188 FY 88/89 -- ----`---------------------- -- ----- FUNDS ----- DF-- 93 TRAFFIC SIGNALS/MISC,LOC, 0 0 20000 30000 50000 GR/RS 94 STREET LIGHTING/RESIDENTIAL 0 100000 0 10 Al a FIELD TOTALS--------------------------------------- 0 10000 10000 GRAS li A2 0 120000 0 0 30000 30000 60000 t r' r Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : - Communry Facilities l K ---------- CIF 8b-90 . ------------------- ID# PROJECT NAME -°------- PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 8,5/86 FY 86!87 FY 87!68 - ----�--`----'-------'- FY 88/89 FY 69!90 i -------------------- FiJftI S 139 REPLACE ROOF 0. ROGERS THEATRE 84283 70000 70000 140 FOUNDAFIONr,J. ROGERS THEATRE 0 75000 0 0 GR/RS i0 A 144 LIGHTING CONVERSIONrCIVIC CTR# 60000 0 0 75000 0 0 GR/RS 10 9 145 ROOF REPAIRrCIVIC CENTER 25000 0000 20000 0 0 0 0 GRlR5 8 g 200 RIVERFRONT PARK RETAINING WALL 30000 L 0 0 0 0 GR/R5 8 A 320 ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 0 0 0 0 FIELD TOTALS----------------- -__0_ 100000 100000 0 0 U 0 GOB A --------------- ------------�--------_----------------,.------------------------------ 0 GR/RS ------------------------------ 199283 325000 250000 0 75000 0 0 8 t r� 1 • Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION :: unicipu1 Court a CIF 8d40 — --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- — — = ----- ---- ------• �. ID4 PROJECT NAME —_-----FRIOR—YRS--5—YR—TOTAL— FY 85/86 FY 86187 FY 81180 FY 88/89 FY— ---- 89/90 FUNDS FCFRI—DFRI -_------.._------- -.--- - 153 COURT FACILITY EXPANSION FIELD TOTALS--------------- b_ 314000 0 0 0 314000 GR/RS 9 Al 0 374000 0 0 0 0 374000 a Table 8 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNCTION : (Landfill w CIF -6-SO ------------------------------- ID# PROJECT NAME ------------------- F---- YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY &5/86 -- -6/-7 FY -7/-- ' --`---`-"`°'-"""-°°'-- FY --/-S FY -9/SO FUNDS ---------------r----- FCFRI DFRI --- -----------C-- 210 LANDFILL CLOSE-OUT 1375000 p 402 SANITARY LANDFILL 287 8000 0 0 FIELD TOTALS------------ p 0 0 0 GOB 0 Al ------------------- 0 GOB 0 ' 4,153000 0 0 0 0 0 z 1 r TABLE 9 PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE : General Revenue/Revenue Sharing CIF 86-90 ------------------------------ ID# PROJECT TAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 85/87 FY 87108 FY 88/89 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCFRI DPRI 1 TYRRELL LIBRARY RESTORATION 0 100000 0 4 100004 4Q #14 FIRE STATION 5434Q0 0 GRfRS 11 Al 50,1 MATCHING FOR AIRPORT MSTR,PLAN 4 5G4000 4000 0 0 0 0 GR/hS 15 Al 72 SPECIAL DRAINAGE PROJECTS 0 106900 0 4 GR/RS B Al 93 TRAFFIC SIGNALS/MISC.LOC, 0 140000 0 0 50400 0 56900 GR/RS 12 A6 94 STREET LIGHTING/RESIDENTIAL o 20000 30000 50000 GR/RS 10 Al 139 REPLACE ROOFrJ, ROGERS THEATRE 84293 70000 74000 4 10004 0 10000 GR/RS 11 A2 140 FOUNDATIONr,J, ROGERS THEATRE 0 75000 0 0 75000 0 0 GR/RS 10 A 144 LIGHTING CONVERSIONPCIVIC CTR, 64000 60000 60000 0 GR/RS 14 D 145 ROOF REPAIRYCIVIC CENTER 25000 20000 20000 4 4 4 0 GR/RS 8 D 153 COURT FACILITY EXPANSION 4 50400 0 4 0 0 GR/RS 8 A 157 CALDWOOD PARK REHAB 50000 0 314000 GR/RS 9 Al 15 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (MISC, ) 0 637900 349100 p 0 GR/RS 13 B 311,1 MATCHING FOR TRANSIT FCLTY IMP 0 13000 13000 0 0 109704 179100 GR/RS 14 B9 320 ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 0 100000. 100000 Q 0 GR/RS 12 B-1 FIELD TOTALS---------------------------------- 0 - GR/RS ------------- 169283 2233800 616104 0 305000 642700 670000 R 4. F Table 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE evenue Fonds (Water Fund) ry -------------- _ ------------------------------------------------------------ CIF 86-90 ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85186 FY 86187 FY 87180 FY 08189 FY 89190 FUNDS FCFRI DFRI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 11 WEST ELEVATED WATER TANK 0 18180 0 18180 12 23RD STR. 12 INCH WATER 164900 0 164900 0 0 0 RB(W) 5 13 SHAKESPEARE 12 INCH WATER LINE 0 "400 0 "4500 0 0 0 RD(W} 9 B2 14 GLADYS 12 INCH WATER LINE 0 60100 0 60100 0 RR(W) 9 B4 0 0 0 15 11TH ST, 60 INCH SANITRY SWR 0 1487750 0 0 RB(W) 9 R5 16 MAJOR DRIVE ELEVATED TANK 0 2829000 0 1ry8?150 �� f 0 0 0 RB(W) 18 EAST-WEST 24" TRANS.LINE SEC.1 0 82900 .54"100 0 0 RB(W) 14 B1 19 5.0 MGD WELL AT LOEB FIELD 0 1571850 0 136390 1227510 0 0 RB(W) 10 BI 20 EAST-WEST 24"TRANS.LINE SEC2 0 141650 1430000 0 0 RB(W) 11 B1 21 KEITH RD 12" WATER LOOP SEC.1 0 0 408800:416800 0 41680 2115120 0 0 RB(W) 11 B2 22 KEITH RD. 12" WATER LOOP SEC.2 0 57880b 00 40884 367920 ?0 0 RB(W) 13 B3 'h 23 UTILITY LINE EXTEN,((fiFIMT. 0 33b0000 57880 5209_0 0 RB(W) 13 B1 300 EAST LUCAS 27" INTERCEPTOR 0 650000 752°500 900000 1000000 RB(W) 12 B1 301 11TH ST,36 INCH INTERCEPTOR 0 4125000 0 0 242500 2425000 0 RB(W) 12 A-1 302 WASHINGTON BLVD 0 450000 450004 0 0 375000 3750000 RF(W) 12 A-1 303 COLLEGE ST - -0- 700000 700000 0 0 0 RB(W) 9 A-1 FIELD TOTALS-------------------------------- - 0 0 -------------------- 0 RB(W) 9 A-1 ----------------------------------------- 0 22173080 1150000 3255130 8797030 4220920 4150000 ,x able 9 (Continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE : Compre en$iveDra inage Pro ra m - ---- -- ------------ ------------- CIF 86-90 ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86087 -• a, `"_----"----------°------------ FY 81188 FY 88/'89 FY 89/90 FUNDS P ----------------------------- CPfiI DFRI 62 MINGLEWOOD 134000 34000 345400 p 63 WOODLANDS DRAINAGE 440000 c 0 Q 0 65 STREET CROSSING tDD6} 0 0 4 CDP 15 Al ?00000 465000 0 CDP 16 BI 66 BROADWAY BOX 198000 0 � 160000 24('000 105000 G CDP 67 COLLEGE/GOLIAD PROJECT 0 0 0 0 CDP 12 B1 68 COLLEGE / BMASH 90000 0 0 0 0 14 B2 9,,00 ° 0 CDP 16 B3 70 23RD ST DITCH NORTH 220000 � p ° ° 0 0 CDP 14 B4 71 23RD ST DITCH SOUTH 0 200040 ° ° 0 0 CDP 15 B6 73 IRVING STREET PH II DRAINAGE 0 1063000 1063004 `00004 00 0 0 CDP 15 B7 74 5TH STREET DRAINAGE 0 98400 98000 0 0 CDP 15 89 75 IH 10/11TH-GAYLN ST.ELIZABETH 225000 463000 463000 0 4 0 0 CDP 15 010 76 SOUTH PARK DRAINAGE 0 1408000 1408000 0 CDP 77 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IIIA DRAINAGE ° 0 0 0 CDP 16 B12 78 FANNIN STREET BOX ° 1b°°Q°° 0 240000 1360400 Q 0 CDP 79 CALDWOOD DRAINAGE 0 1900000 0 275000 1625000 0 0 CDP 15 B13 80 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IIIB DRAINAGE 0 1500000 4 20004 330000 4 0 CDP 15 814 81 HIGH SCHOOL DITCH PHASE I 1500000 0 0 CDP 15 815 82 FANNETT ROAD PHASE II 0 1800000 0 120000 1680000 0 O'CDP 15 B16 83 MOORS/t1NIVERSITY DRAINAGE 0 600000 0 600000 041404 00 0 CDP 15 B17 84 HIGH SCHOOL DITCH PHASE II 0 500000 0 CDP 15 018 85 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IV 0 1400000 0 0 500000 0 0 CDP 15 019 92 DRAINAGE RESERVE 57500 0 100000 1300000 q 317 GULF TERRACE OJTFALL DITCH 12 0 Q 0 CDP 15 B20 318 PARK NORTH DITCH 0 220000 0 220000 0 0 0 CDP 12 A4 424 PRINCE ST. PH. III 0 100000 0 100000 0 19 A-8 600000 0 0 0 0 CDP 16 C2 FIELD TOTALS-------------------------------- 0 0 0 CDP ________________4--------__-_____---------�------------------------------------------------------------ 2390000 14772000 3377000 2148000 9142000 105000 0 V ' 1� Table 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE :Grant CIF 86-90 ---------------------------- ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86187 FY 81188 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCPRI DPRI 9 PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER PHASE 4 217000 100000 100000 0 0 0 0 GRANT 15 E4 y 38 NEW PARK :HEBERT HIGH AREA 0 675000 0 200000 100000 0 315000 GRANT 19 C 38.1 MATCHING FOR #38 HEBERT AREA 0 675000 0 200000 100000 0 375000 GRANT 18 C 50 UPDATE MASTER PLAN 36000 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRANT 8 Al 158 PIPKIN PARK REHAB 0 50000 0 50000 0 0 0 GRANT 15 B 162 RIVERFRONT PARK PHASE 2 0 1500000 0 1500000 0 0 0 GRANT 11 C 166 NEW PARKiFLORIDA/HIGHLAND AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 60000 0 GRANT 17 B 167 NEW PARK 4TH/11TH/WASH/COLL 0 60000 0 60000 0 0 167#1 GRANT 17 MATCH FOR#167 4/11/WASH/COLL 0 60000 0 60000 0 0 0 GRANT 17 B 168 NEW PARK:AMELIA 60000 0 0 GRANT 17 B 171 NEW PARK;WINDEMERE AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 60000 0 GRANT 16 C 172 NEW PARK:105/MAJOR/KEITH/LNVA 0 60000 0 0 0 60000 0 GRANT 16 C 173 NEW PARK:PARK MEADOWS AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 0 60000 GRANT 16 C 174 COLLIERS FERRY PARK 0 375000 0 GRANT 17 D 211 BEST YEARS CENTER 70000 100000 100000 0 0 0 0 GRANT 12 FIELD TOTALS---------------------------------------------------------- 323000 3895000 200000 2070000 260000 555000 810000 f 1 I` f Table 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE Transportation knDrovement Program CIF 86-90 -------------------------------- -------------------------------- ID# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87188 FY 88189 FY 89/90 FUNDS PCPRI DPRI ------------------------D--------------------------------------------------�----------- 99 LIBERTY-LAUREL I y 100 COLLEGE STREET 3374000 30000 0 30000 0 0 0 TIP 14 BI 0 0 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE 1230000 0 0 0 0 0 TIP 16 B2 102 SPUR 380 RIGHT OF WAY (MLK) 300000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIP 14 B4 103 MAJOR DRIVE 9600000 16080000 238000 1370000 0 0 0 TIP 12 R5 104 GLADYS STREET 105 CONCORD ROAD PHASE I 847700 3536700 0 3536740 ® 0 0 TIP 12 B6 110 STREET/DRAINAGE PARTICIPATION 1365470 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIP 13 B12 0 0 TIP 11 B7 111 LIBERTY - LAUREL PH.II 400404 0 113 LUCAS 210000 2999500 0 0 2749500 0 0 0 TIP 114 CONCORD II 340800 726000 0 250000 6000 0 0 TIP 10 B15 117 WASHINGTON BLVD 190000 450009. 450000 0 0 0 0 TIP 12 B16 118 T.I.P. RESERVE 304000 0 0 0 0 TIF 13 8-14 FIELD TOTALS---------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 TIP B20 ----------------------------------------- 12532770 9350200 688000 5186700 3475500 0 0 Y� VV • Table 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE : Donations ®mss CIF 86-90 ----------------------------- ID# PROJECT HAKE PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86/87 ---------------------.____-_-__ FY ----- FY ----- -- ----- Flt--- ----- D--- 168-1 MATCH FOR #16O AMELIA PARK 0 60000 0 f 169 NEW PARK;WILLOW CREEK AREA 0 60000 0 0 DOH 17 D 170 NEW PARKIDELAWARE PLACE AREA 60000 60000 0 0 DON 16 C 171,1 MATCN FOR#1T1 WINDEMERE AREA 0 60000 0 0 0 DON 15 C 172.1 MATCH FOR #172 105/MAJOR 0 60000 0 0 60000 0 0 DON 16 C 173-1 MATCH FOR #1731 PARK MEADOWS 0 60000 0 174.1 MATCH FOR #174 COLLIERS FERRY 0 375000 0 16 C 177 TYRRELL PARK IMPRROVEMENTS 0 0 375000 0 DON 16 C 0 500000 0 250000 250000 O DON 17 D FIELD TOTALS--------------------------------------------------------------- 0 1235000 0 60000 550000 625000 0 gable 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE GeneralObfilaateon Bonds --------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CIF 06-90 ID4 PROJECT NAME PRIOR - YR TOTAL FY FY FY 8889 FY ----------- - -------------------------------------- - - -` ----- ----------- - ----------------------------0 FUNDS FCFRI DFRI 106 - ----- - X• � SIDEWALKS 425000 600000 0 300000 0 116 FOLSOM;CROW TO DOWLEN 0 1365000 0 0 1365000 3400000 0 GOB 13 B- 119 HELBIG ROAD 0 7590000 0 2590040 0 GOB 12 B1- 124 WALDEN ROAD 0 0 GOB 8 B-18A 0 200 RI'JERFfiONT PARK RETAINING WALL 30000 4190000 0 0 0 0 4190000 GOB 11 C-6 210 LANDFILL CLOSE-OUT 1315000 0 0 0 0 GOB A 402 SANITARY LANDFILL 0 0 0 2-1---- 0 0 0 0 0 GOB Al FIELD TOTALS---------------------------------- 0 -------------------------------- 0 GOB 410 0000 9345000 0 2890000 1365000 300000 4190000 0 Table 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE User Fees CIF 86-90 --------------------------- ---------------------- x PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86!87 FY 87!88 -----------------`_---------------------__-_-_ FY BB/B9 FY B9l40 FUNL15 FCFRI DFRI --------------------------------6------------------------------------------------------------ :. 40.1 # 14 FIRE STATION � 41 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY 0 37000 37000 0 FIELD TOTALS TRAINING --`60000- 263000 38000 75000 75000 75000 0 OF 15 Al --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 OF 5 CB 260000 300000 75000 75000 75000 75000 0 - I: Table 9 (continued) PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE : Internal flevenue 13onds CIF 86-90 ----------------------------- IA# PROJECT NAME PRIOR YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85/86 FY 86187 FY 87188 FY 88/89 FY 89190 FUNDS °------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PCPRI ---- 24 HOMPERG GOLF COURSE 637720 FIELD TOTALS--------------- 0 0 0 RR(I1 637720 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a: it i as. Y ',7 Table 9 (continued) PROJECT'S BY FUNDING SOURCE : Lease Income CIF 86-90 ----------------------------------------- ', ID# PROJECT NAME _-PRIOR-YRS 5 YR TOTAL FY 85186 FY 86187 FY 87188 FY 88/89 FY 89/90 FUNDS FCFRI DFRI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- w: 1-1 LEASE FUND FOR TYRRELL LIBRARY � 15 177.1 LEASE FUND FOR TYRRELL PARK 0 24500 M00 6000 6000 0 0 LEASE 13 Al FIELD TOTALS-------------- __-----_ ---- 1500 6000 6000 0 49000 25000 12000 12000 0 0 14. '.N f .H Figure 1 s� /lfn' s fsls�� LlRRY LTH A&&! PAL COURT cr- -A106 . � ------------------------ ---- ---- IU# PROJECT NAME FUNDS ----------------- 1 L 1+1 LEASE FUND FORYTYRRELLA I.H. IFR�LIBRARY LEASE ! 10 9 PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER PHASE 4 GRANT 153 COURT FACILITY EXPANSION MY LVAtTS • X153 GR/RS cr a �A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GROGRAM ____j Beaumont, Texas 1 986- 1990 t ' �' 19 Figure 2 \_=\ J WATER AND SEWER T• CIF' S6-SO ----------------------------------------------- IDS-_--PROJECT-NAME -- FUNDS HWY. 106 8 11 WEST ELEVATED WATER TANK RE( W) 12 :3RD STR. 12 INCH WATER RE( W ) 300 14 GL IrY5F 12RINCH WATER LINE LINE Rp W ) �1 ) I5 11TH ST. 60 INC14 SANITRY SWR RD( W ) 16 MAJOR DRIVE ELEVATED TANK RD(W ) 1S EAST-WEST 24" TRANS.LIME SEC.1 RB( W ) 1$� 14 20 r" 20 �.0 MGD WELL«AT LOEB FIELD � RE,( W ) I.H. �0 0 EAST-►.LEST _'f TRANS.LINE SEC2 RD( W ) an ,--1 KEITH RD 12" WATER LOOP SEC. 1 RB( W 2 } KEITH RD. 1, WATER LOOP SEC.2 Rf( W ) V23 UrIL.ITY LINE EXTEN.RRPLMT. RU W } _ 2 3 "�2j 30 300 LAST LUCAS 27" INTERCEPTOR RE{t W) crry�nNr `- , 301 11TH ST.3b INCH INTERCEPTOR RE( W ) �- 302 WASHINGTON BLVD RB( W } L - 03 303 COLLEGE ST RE( W ) W a 302, `-1 §016 .15 Flu- \ v-Various L.ocations � IMPROVEMENTS RROGRAM ______j `oft Beaumont, Texas 1986-- 1990 ,,� Figure 3 \j | — -- CIP 86-9O --------------------------------------------- | ID# PROJECT NAME FUNDS ---_----------------------------------------- 24 HOMBERC GOLF COURSE RB( I ) 38 NEW PARK �H[BERT HIGH AREA GRANT 38.1 MATCHING FOR #38 GRANT | 157 CALDWOOD PARK RE ^^~�"' ""�n — 158 PIPKIN PARK REHAB �R/RS U � u� 16 RIVE o CRANT ---- ---� 16 "' ""'` GRANT | 16 .`^° . """ r A GRANT wwox �� 16� ,1 _�_C. ,.`, 4.,, 11/n/woSn/CuLL GRANT 16� .... " . ""#167 4/1uwo�n/[ULL GRANT U NEW PAR _ _ . GRANT 168.1 F 1�9 '^''~^ "� DON � ��� WN--� 170 '-~ ' ~' DON-vi 62_ ..E. . ."'`^"=Lnwnxc PLACE AREA DUN 1 | 1�- 1 NEW ' "' "^°Inucncnc AREA GRANT 171^ MATCH OR�171 WINDEMERE AREA DON Z NEW PARK:105/MAJOR/ GRANT . 17�^1 MATCH FOR #172 1O5/"�^ '"'�mvn | 1�3 NEW n*oux DUN ' """°nn^ nc*»uw� ox�H GRANT 173^1 MATCH FOR 4173, PARK MEADOWS DON �� 174 COLLIERS �� 174 1 MATCH^""R'�n^/ rn«� CRANT ` 177^ TyRRELrupA*z/4M[ULLIERS FERRY DON ����� 177^1 LEASE LUND««OI ykKOVE DON ` 211 BEST YEARS r ^ / /««ELL raKK LEASE E CENTER GRANT ft ol 66\ . 24 �� -_ \~~_�.�/ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS] | ��� ' ^ « « Fl, iPROGRAM roolth �eau ont, Texas 1986- 1990 . x �� Figure 4 AIRPORT,LANDFILL , FIRE JId CIF' ub-50 ------------------------------------------- "Y 10 � � II►# PROJECT NAME FUNDS �1 ------------------------------------------- L- h SO UPDATE MASTER PLAN GRANT. 50.1 MATCHING FOR AIRPORT MSTR.PLAN GR/RS 470 402 SA tITARY LANDFILLT GOB �o GOB 40 114 FIRE STATION GR/RS 40.1 # 14 FIRE STATION OF 47 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY OF �crrY nNrrs ' '050 W 40, \ 02 ----�. CAPITAL IIi/IPROVE[VfENT�' PROGRAM ^� Beaumont, Texas — "t � 1986 1999 Figure 5 DRA114AGE IJ CIP 86-90 a� IDf-`__PROJECT-NAME __---______ FUNDS 318 � _______________ 63 62 MINGLEWOOD CDP 63 WOODLANDS DRAINAGE CDP 61 1/65 STREET CROSSING ( DD6 ) CDP HWY. 105 66 BROADWAY BOX CDP 6; COLLEGE/GOLIAD PROJECT CDP 68 COLLEGE / I:MASH CDP �I 170 23RD ST DITCH NORTH CDP 7.1 23RD ST DITCH SOUTH CDP 7�� 62 420 ) 1/.79.- SPECIAL DRAINAGE_ PROJECTS GR/RS 73 IRVING STREET PH IT DRAINAGE CDP .2 74 5TH STREET DRAINAGE CDP 75 IH 10/11TH-GAYLN ST-ELIZABETH CDP 76 SOUTH PARK DRAINAGE CDP I.H. 77 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IIIA DRAINAGE CDP 70 75 78 FANNIN STREET BOX CDP 79 CALDWOOD DRAINAGE CDP J 7 8 1 X84 6�6 80 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IIIB DRAINAGE CDP CITY�p,n 81 HIGH SCHOOL DITCH PHASE I CDP ,�� 82 FANNETT ROAD PHASE IT CDP 67 83 MOORE/UNIVERSITY DRAINAGE cr�r �� 73 84 HIGH SCHOOL DITCH PHASE II CDP L W 741 80 85 CARTWRIGHT PHASE IV CDF' 3 7 ' � i�j 9= , DRAINAGE RESERVE CDP 85 C._ 31 GULF TERRACE OUTFALL DITCH 12 CDP �p 31s PARK NORTH DITCH CDP ,P'82 q76 \ 420 PRINCE ST. PH, III CDP (83 v-Various Locations -� CAPITAL IMP � ROVEMEI�TS I�ROGRAM "°"'' Beaumont, Texas 1986- 1 990 Figure 6 TRANSfT , STREET LIGHTS & TRAFFIC SIGNALS I CIF 84-90 ------------------------------------------------ ID# PROJECT NAME FUNDS l V 93 TRAFFIC SIGNALS/MISC.LOC. GR/FS l" V 94 STREET LIGHTING/RESIDENTIAL GR/RS 10 311 TRANSIT FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS GRANT 311.1 MATCHING FOR TRANSIT FCLTY IMF GR/RS r� 311 MY u+Rg J 7 G v—Various Locations F 'ITAL IMPROVEMENTS , PROGRAM — 1990 � Beaumont, Texas 1986 h `�o " ^g= e «�� ���-�� . �� uoxEExS CIP 86-9O ' -------------------------------------------- | ID# PROJECT NAME FUNDS -------------------------------------------- HM 106 ' 99 LIBERTY-LAUREL I TIP 10O COLLEGE STREET TIP i 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE TIP / �� 102 SPUR 380 RIGHT OF WAY ( MLK ) TIP ^ ^ ^~ 103 MAJOR DRIVE TIP | 104 GLADYS STREET TIP / 105 CONCORD ROAD PHASE I TIP ' 106 SIDEWALKS GOB ��11O STREET/DRAINAGE PARTICIPATION TIP r 104 11,3 NUK 1 �' ��1 LIBERTY - LAUREL PH,II TIP . 113 LUCAS TIP /--_' 114 CONCORD IT TIP 116 FOLSOM4CROW TO DOWLEN GOB | 117 WASHINGTON BLVD TIP 103 118 T.I.P. RESERVE TIP . 119 HELBIG ROAD GOB COLLEGE| 124 WALDEN ROAD COB V215 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (MISC. ) CR/RS [- v—Various Locations CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Beaumont Texas 1986- 1990 . � `-- ----- -----� - U . `^ Figure 8 COMMUNITY FACUT`IES 4'/.��r9fa�dy�U i { CIF' S6°90 VYY. 10 /{sa -------------------------------------------- " ID# PROJECT NAME FUNDS -------------------------------------------- 139 REPLACE ROOFY1. ROGERS THEATRE GR/RS LK 10 / 140 FOUNDATIONP .,1. ROGERS THEATRE GR/RS 144 LIGHTING CONVERSION,CIVIC CTR. GR/RS r---� 139,145 145 ROOF REPAIR►CIVIC CENTER GR/RS 140200 200 RIVERFRONT PARK RETAINING WALL GOES 320 ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GR/RS � �g c144,320 a �0 ,� ----�--�,, CAPITAL lMPROVEME�TS PROGRAM �� ! Beaumont, Texas 1986- 1990 THE CIP PROCESS The preparation of the current CIP began in January, 1985,__ and will be completed when the CIP is adopted by City Council. The following steps were involved in the CIP process: STEP 1: Each participating City department prepared a detailed, 2—page form summarizing each of the department's proposed projects. These forms (compiled as Appendix "A" — Preliminary Project Proposals). Included in the forms were cost estimates, time schedules, recommended funding sources, justification for projects, location maps, priority ranking, estimated impacts of projects on the City's operating budget, and relationship of projects to other planned or completed projects. STEP 2: The Planning Department transferred the project information to a computer file, produced tables showing the total cost of the approximately 2UU proposals by year, function and funding source. Projects were also mapped to show the geographic distribution of the proposals. STEP 3: The Planning Commission adopted a priority rating system (discussed later in this chapter) to be used in rating projects as to their effectiveness in implementing the Comprehensive Plan. STEP 4: The Planning Commission's CIP subcommittee reviewed the proposed projects with City department heads. The City Manager also went through this same process. STEP 5: The Planning Department applied the Planning Commission's point ranking system to the proposed projects. The commission passed these recommendations on to the City Manager. Each project had also received a "departmental priority" rating during Step 1 of the process. This rating system is also discussed later in this chapter. STEP 6: The City Manager and his staff analyzed the City's capacity to fund capital improvements projects over the next five years based on expected operating expenditures, debt service requirements, and revenues. STEP 7: Based upon funding limitations and capabilities identified in Step 6, a preliminary list of projects was compiled. The following projects were included: a) Any project which had received an "A" (critical to public health, safety and welfare) departmental priority rating. b) Any project which scored 16 or higher on the Planning Commission's priority rating system. c) Any project funded by an approved bond issue, an approved grant, or water revenue bonds. d) Any project that could be reasonably expected to be entirely or substantially funded by a grant. STEP 8: The list was revised in order to bring proposed expenditures for each of the five years within the limits of available funding. STEP 9: Several projects identified as critical needs by the City Manager were added back to the preliminary list. Several projects already authorized in the 1983-84 budget were deleted from the list. A few projects with enough revenue- producing or cost-saving capacity to "pay for themselves" were added to the list. Other minor adjustments were made to keep the total proposed CIP expenditures within the limits of available funding. STEP 10: Review by Management Team (City Manager and department heads). STEP 11: Review and recommendation by Planning Commission. STEP 12: "Workshop" review with City Council. STEP 13: Adoption. STEP 14: Staff will re-evaluate this year's CIP process to determine what changes should be made in next year's process. STEP 15: The City's Budget and Research Department will monitor the financial status of capital projects in progress on a continuous. .basis and will issue reports quarterly. PRIORITY RATING SYSTEMS As previously noted, two unrelated priority rating systems were used in prioritizing projects. Departmental priorities were based upon severity of need in terms of the protection and welfare of the public, anticipated future needs for replacement of facilities, and the City staff's concerns with delivery of high quality, efficient cervices. The Planning Commission's rating system was primarily based upon the goals, objectives, policies and proposals of the Comprehensive Plda. DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITY RATINGS Projects were ranked by the initiating department using a four-level scale: Priority "A", Critical. Indicates a project of critical need which cannot reasonably be postponed because it will provide a remedy for conditions dangerous to public health, welfare, or safety, or it brings the City into compliance with legal require- ments. Priority "B", Essential. Indicates projects which should be carried out within a few years to met current or anticipated needs or for replacement of unsatisfactory facilities. Priority "C", Desirable. Indicates projects neeaed for a proper and desirable expansion of a department program. The exact timing of these projects can wait until funds are available. Priority "D", As Required. Indicates projects which would be needed for ideal operation but which cannot yet be recommended for action. These projects can be postponed without detriment to present services. Projects were also prioritized within each of the four categories above by adding a number (A-1, A-2, A-3, etc. ) with "1" being the highest priority. PLANNING COMMISSION PRIORITY RATINGS The following rating system was officially adopted by the Planning Commission in order to create an effective link between the Comprehensive Plan and the CIP. The criteria are based upon adopted goals, objectives, policies, and proposals from the Comprehensive Plan; goals statements contained in the officially-adopted Goals for Beaumont document; and general City responsibilities such as protecting the public health, safety and welfare and provision of services on an equitable basis. PO INT VALUE CRITERIA PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFAYLE, 3 Project is needed as soon as possible to correct serious service deficiencies which threaten the public health, safety, or welfare. Project will directly improve public health, safety or welfare. I Project is needed to retain existing services to protect the public, health, safety or welfare. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3 Project will directly result in permanent private sector jobs; new businesses or industries; or will directly "leverage" private sector development. 2 Project will make introduction of new private sector jobs, businesses, or inaustry more feasible. I Project will provide temporary p ry construction jobs. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION/REVITALIZATION 3 Project is an essential element of ^_ . a neigh- borhood conservation or revi*_a-Lization effort. 2 Project will contribute to neighborhood conservation or revitalization. 1- Project will prevent further neighborhood deterioration. �. S DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION 3 Project will directly support new private construction or revitalization in the central business district. 2 Project will directly contribute to down- town's status as a regional center of com- merce, professional services, government, entertainment, and tourism. I Project will provide indirect support to the downtown's status as a regional center of commerce, professional services, government, entertainment, and tourism. NEW GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT 3 Project will support programmed new private sector development in accordance with the Land Use Plan. 2 Project will make new, private development in accordance with the Land Use Plan more feasible in the immediate future. 1 Project will improve long-term prospects for new private development in accordance with the Land Use Plan. QUALITY OF LIFE 3 Project will directly increase cultural, recreational or educational opportunities available to citizens. 2 Project does not meet above criteria but will improve the image and physical appearance of Beaumont. I Project Is needed to retain existing of life features. quality EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF SERVICES 3 Project corrects an inequitable service deficiency in an existing developed area. ;�. 6 2 Project improves the city—wide distribution of services. — 1 Project is needed to retain existing level of equitability in City services. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 3 Project is required to brim City into compliance with Federal or State environmental standards. 2 Project will improve or help preserve some part of the natural environment. 1 Project will not disturb the existing natural environment. LEVEL AND QUALITY OF SERVICES 3 Project will expand services provided to the public to include new services. 2 Project will make existing services more efficient or convenient to the public. 1 Project will help sustain existing level of services. VOTER ACTION (BOND ELECTIONS) 3 Project has been approved by voters in a bond election. ,_.._1 _ Project will not be built without voter approval in a future bond election. The priority rankings developed through this process were major factors used in selecting projects for the final CIP. Other factors were the submitting department's own priority ratings an the availability of funds. 2 . 7 Since the City's various capital project funding sources are generally not interchangeable, some projects which were included in the Council's final CIP had lower priority ratings. than projects which are not included. As an example, a project with secure funding from a Federal grant or bond issue might be ' included in the first year of the CIP, while a project with a higher priority rating but without a feasible funding source might be deferred until a later fiscal year. 2. d